If his introducing of the JQ leads to exposing the synagogue of Satan, then I don't have a problem. If it's just a blanket "the jews" then he's a wolf.
>Steak n Shake
I have a potential part of the solution, I think. Ban dual citizenship with countries that have a state religion/don't allow for freedom of religion. If Israel wants to be a jewish state, if China wants to be atheist, if ISIS wants to be muslim, so beit, but there citizens cannot be dual citizens with countries that have enlightenment values.
Many might say that dual citizenship should be disallowed altogether. I'm open to the idea, but there's actually decent cases for allowing it on the margins. Certainly for high office, I would be inclined to ban it, but not just outright. The key seems to have more to do with fundamental ideological difference in how to govern and on what to base authority of governance. That doesn't mean religion is excluded from the state. It just means the state cannot have a religion/ideology. In a sense, the state does have a religion already: freedom of religion, westphalian order, elightenment values, christian-informed but not exclusive. if you don't hold that philosophy as the basis for government, you really might be happier living outside of the west. But you definitely shouldn't have dual citizenship in a western country.
The long-term issue with dual citizenship has less to do with the ties to two different states. It might be argued that the state should compete for their citizens! The real issue is that the fundamental values between certain states should be the same. The west is mostly on the same page, though some are falling into the atheist/communist mode. I think this was attractive to the jews in germany precisely because their religion was their government. Hitler's solution was nationalism. That's not the solution. The real solution is that each jew needed to either separate religion from state or move to state where their religion was the state. Judiasm and Islam, for most, are still stuck in a pre-enlightenment mentality. When in the west, they both tend towards communism because it's the force against the government which is neutral to what they believe a government's role is. Sure, perhaps government could promote stronger religious ties, morals, and ethics, but ultimately leave it to the public to sort out. It would be better than a purely disinterested government which falls into agnosticism, communism, and evil(lack of god).