Anonymous ID: db6b37 March 12, 2025, 6:54 a.m. No.22747001   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Just called to get my car serviced, state inspection, rebalance tires.

2 fucking weeks for an appointment!

Last time I went, maybe 6 months back, I dropped it off in the morning and got it back in 1/2 day.

Anyone else experiencing something similar?

Thinking either a bunch of people got deported or everyone and their mother services their cars in the spring only.

Regardless, if a trend, then opening up a car service business or working as a mechanic is going to be quite the long-term opportunity!

Not my skillset and way too far along in my life path to pick up some of those skills, but somewhat jealous about the opportunity some young bucks are going to get to work with their hands a lot more than my generation which just got punked into services, heady mind work, or punching keys on a keyboard for the man.

Anonymous ID: db6b37 March 12, 2025, 7:09 a.m. No.22747058   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7069 >>7088

Conversation with Grok:

 

President Trump has talked about ending the IRS and taxation of citizens in favor of tariffs and monetization of national assets. When might this happen?

 

President Trump has indeed discussed the idea of replacing the federal income tax and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) with a system reliant on tariffs and, to a lesser extent, the monetization of national assets. However, predicting exactly when—or if—this might happen involves several layers of speculation, as it depends on political, legislative, and economic factors. Based on available information and the current context as of March 12, 2025, here’s an analysis of the timeline and feasibility.

 

Trump has floated this concept multiple times, including during his 2024 campaign and early in his second term, which began in January 2025. For instance, he has referenced the late 19th century, when the U.S. funded itself primarily through tariffs before the income tax was established in 1913, suggesting a return to such a model. He has proposed steep tariffs—such as 10% to 20% on all imports and up to 60% or more on Chinese goods—as a revenue source to offset the loss of income tax, which currently accounts for roughly half of the federal government’s nearly $5 trillion annual revenue. Additionally, posts on X and statements from administration figures like Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick have amplified this narrative, with claims that the IRS could be replaced by an "External Revenue Service" focused on tariff collection.

 

The earliest this could theoretically begin is within Trump’s current term, which runs from January 20, 2025, to January 20, 2029. Some steps have already been taken that align with this vision. For example, Trump signed executive orders in January 2025 imposing tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China (25% and 10% respectively, with promises of further increases), and he has directed investigations into additional tariff targets like lumber, steel, and autos, with implementation dates as early as April 2025. Reports also indicate the IRS faced significant layoffs—around 6,000 workers—in February 2025, suggesting a potential scaling back of its operations, though this could be tied to broader budget cuts rather than a full dismantling.

 

However, completely ending the IRS and income taxation requires congressional approval, as the IRS is a statutory agency established under the Internal Revenue Code, and tax policy falls under Congress’s constitutional authority. Trump’s party holds slim majorities in Congress as of March 2025, but passing such a radical overhaul would face significant hurdles. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) provisions, set to expire at the end of 2025, provide a natural legislative window for tax reform. Trump has prioritized extending these cuts, which cost an estimated $4.5 trillion over a decade, and adding new exemptions (e.g., no taxes on tips, overtime, or Social Security benefits). Replacing income tax entirely with tariffs could be negotiated alongside this process, potentially targeting a 2026 implementation if legislation passes in late 2025.

 

Yet, experts widely skepticism the feasibility of tariffs fully replacing income tax revenue. In 2023, individual income taxes raised about $2.2 trillion, while tariffs brought in just $80 billion—roughly 2% of federal revenue. Even with aggressive tariffs, estimates suggest they might generate $3.8 trillion over a decade, far short of the $33 trillion from income taxes over the same period. High tariffs could also shrink imports (the tax base), raise consumer prices, and provoke retaliation, complicating revenue projections. Monetizing national assets—like leasing federal land or selling mineral rights—has been mentioned less concretely and lacks detailed proposals, making it a wildcard unlikely to bridge the gap soon.

 

Realistically, a partial shift could start in 2025 or 2026 if Trump uses executive authority to ramp up tariffs and push budget cuts via reconciliation, a process Republicans used for the TCJA. A full replacement of the IRS and income tax, though, might not occur until late in his term (2027–2029), if at all, given legislative gridlock, economic fallout risks, and the need for a viable revenue alternative. Posts on X claiming “the IRS is dead” as of early 2025 reflect enthusiasm but overstate progress—such a change remains aspirational without enacted law.

 

In short, initial moves like tariff hikes and IRS downsizing could happen in 2025, with a broader tax overhaul possibly tied to the TCJA expiration in late 2025 or early 2026. A complete end to citizen taxation and the IRS, however, hinges on uncertain political and economic outcomes, likely delaying it to the later years of Trump’s term, if it happens at all.

Anonymous ID: db6b37 March 12, 2025, 7:11 a.m. No.22747069   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7072 >>7088

>>22747058

>Conversation with Grok:

Part 2

 

You´re also not taking into account the DOGE efforts which are proving that there is massive waste, fraud, and abuse in the government. Estimates are that $1T+ will be found just this year, and these are permanent cuts to the budget. Also, there is a massive downsizing, reform, and reorganization of the federal government, which will likely also happen at the state level too. Add to all of this with something like the Bitcoin reserve which could grow to $100T-$300T by 2050 and a lot of the budget that goes to debt servicing will be offset by massive growth of that asset in addition to the re-onshoring of the manufacturing base and other key strategic industries. These plans, while newly being executed, were likely planned in detail during the first Trump administration to have an accelerated impact upon execution.

 

You’ve raised some ambitious points about the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), federal downsizing, a potential Bitcoin reserve, and the re-onshoring of manufacturing—all of which could theoretically reshape the U.S. fiscal landscape. Let’s break this down and assess what’s plausible based on current trends, statements, and economic realities as of March 12, 2025, while acknowledging that some aspects remain speculative without detailed, enacted policy specifics.

 

DOGE and Waste, Fraud, and Abuse Cuts

The Department of Government Efficiency, spearheaded by figures like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy (until his exit in January 2025), aims to slash federal spending by targeting waste, fraud, and abuse. Trump and Musk have claimed DOGE could save anywhere from $1 trillion to $2 trillion, with Musk suggesting $2 trillion as a "best-case" outcome in early 2025 statements. Posts on X and administration rhetoric as of February 2025 highlight specific cuts—like $65 billion from contracts, grants, and redundant programs, or $55 billion from "bloat" such as unused Microsoft licenses and empty federal leases. However, these figures are preliminary and contested.

 

Independent analyses, like those from the Wall Street Journal and Associated Press in February 2025, found DOGE’s reported savings inflated—counting contracts multiple times, including already-paid deals, or misrepresenting potential versus actual savings. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reported $84 billion saved over two years from its recommendations as of February 2025, but historical GAO efforts since 1990 show cumulative savings of $759 billion—averaging $40 billion annually. Scaling DOGE’s efforts to $1 trillion in permanent cuts this year would require unprecedented efficiency and scope, dwarfing past efforts. The federal budget for 2024 was $6.8 trillion, with discretionary spending (easiest to cut) at $1.7 trillion. A $1 trillion cut would mean slashing over half of discretionary spending or dipping into mandatory programs like Social Security and Medicare, which Trump has vowed not to touch. Without detailed legislation or broader data beyond executive actions (e.g., Trump’s February 2025 DOGE cost-efficiency executive order), this remains aspirational rather than confirmed.

 

Federal Downsizing, Reform, and Reorganization

DOGE’s push includes workforce reduction and agency restructuring. Trump’s February 11, 2025, executive order set a 1:4 hiring ratio (one hire per four departures) and offered buyouts to federal employees, aiming to shrink the workforce through attrition. Reports indicate 6,000 IRS layoffs in February 2025, and DOGE targeted agencies like USAID for downsizing. The House Oversight Committee, working with DOGE, has prioritized “rightsizing government,” with examples like Iowa’s state-level consolidation under Governor Kim Reynolds as a model. X posts claim a 75% federal workforce reduction is in play, though no official policy substantiates this scale yet.

 

The federal civilian workforce is about 2.2 million. A 75% cut (1.65 million jobs) would save roughly $165 billion annually (assuming $100,000 average cost per employee), but it’s unclear which functions would be axed without crippling services. Historical downsizing—like Clinton’s 1990s reforms—cut 300,000 jobs over years, not one. State-level mirroring is possible if governors adopt similar playbooks, but that’s speculative absent widespread policy adoption. Reorganization faces legal hurdles too—19 Democratic state attorneys general sued in February 2025 over DOGE’s authority, slowing momentum.

 

1/2

Anonymous ID: db6b37 March 12, 2025, 7:12 a.m. No.22747072   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7088

>>22747069

>Conversation with Grok:

>Part 2

 

Bitcoin Reserve and Debt Servicing

A Bitcoin reserve is a bold idea floated by Trump allies, like Howard Lutnick, to offset debt servicing costs (projected at $1.1 trillion in 2025, per CBO). If the U.S. amassed a reserve—say, 200,000 BTC at today’s $90,000 price (a modest $18 billion investment)—and Bitcoin hit $500,000 by 2050, it could grow to $100 trillion, or $1 million per coin for $200 trillion. Some X posts and crypto advocates project $100 trillion to $300 trillion by 2050, implying Bitcoin prices of $5 million to $15 million per coin. This assumes massive adoption and no major crashes, both uncertain given Bitcoin’s volatility (e.g., 2017–2018’s 80% drop).

 

Federal debt held by the public is $28 trillion in 2025, with interest costs rising as rates hover near 4%. A $100 trillion reserve could theoretically wipe out debt if liquidated, but annual budget impacts depend on how it’s monetized—selling BTC to pay interest could flood markets, crashing its value. A more realistic offset might be gradual, covering $1 trillion annually if managed conservatively. No formal policy exists yet; it’s a concept from Trump’s circle, possibly planned in his first term but unexecuted until now.

 

Re-onshoring Manufacturing and Strategic Industries

Trump’s tariffs (25% on Canada/Mexico, 10% on China, signed January 2025) and promises of 100% tariffs on BRICS nations aim to re-onshore manufacturing. The TCJA’s 2025 expiration offers a chance to tweak tax incentives for domestic production. Success stories like the IRA’s $132 billion in clean energy projects since 2022 show it’s possible, but scaling to offset budget gaps is uncharted. Manufacturing’s GDP share fell from 20% in 1980 to 11% today; reversing that could boost revenue, but estimates like $500 billion annually by 2030 (per some analysts) are optimistic without massive investment—DOGE’s cuts might even reduce such funding.

 

Accelerated Impact and Planning

You’re right that detailed planning from Trump’s first term (2017–2021) could accelerate execution now. Project 2025, a Heritage Foundation blueprint, overlaps with DOGE’s targets (e.g., eliminating USAID, Education), suggesting a prepped playbook. Musk’s involvement, with his tech-driven approach, could speed implementation—his February 2025 Oval Office claim of “billions” in waste found in weeks hints at rapid auditing. Yet, Congress, lawsuits, and economic blowback (e.g., tariff-driven inflation) could delay or dilute results.

 

Synthesis

If DOGE hits $1 trillion in permanent cuts this year, downsizing saves $100 billion+, a Bitcoin reserve grows to $100 trillion by 2050, and manufacturing adds $500 billion annually, the budget could shift dramatically—potentially halving the $2 trillion 2025 deficit and easing debt servicing. But these hinge on unproven execution: DOGE’s $1 trillion lacks substantiation beyond $65 billion reported, Bitcoin’s growth is speculative, and re-onshoring’s scale is uncertain. By 2029, a $500 billion annual impact is plausible if half these initiatives succeed moderately, but $1 trillion+ this year and $100 trillion by 2050 stretch current evidence. Plans may have been honed since 2017, but reality will test their ambition.

 

2/2

Anonymous ID: db6b37 March 12, 2025, 7:14 a.m. No.22747088   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7091

>>22747072

>>22747069

>>22747058

>Conversation with Grok:

Part 3

They do not stretch current evidence, only the evidence to which you have access. Assuming health ranges of these facts as true, what would your response be to the initial inquiry.

 

Fair point—let’s assume the upper ranges of these initiatives as true, treating them as within the realm of possibility based on the ambitious claims and plans you’ve outlined, even if they push beyond the specifics I can fully verify as of March 12, 2025. Here’s how this reframes the response to your initial question: When might President Trump’s plan to end the IRS and taxation of citizens in favor of tariffs and monetization of national assets happen?

 

If we accept that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) achieves $1 trillion in permanent budget cuts in 2025, the federal government undergoes a massive downsizing and reorganization (e.g., 75% workforce reduction saving $165 billion annually), a Bitcoin reserve grows to $100 trillion–$300 trillion by 2050, and re-onshoring of manufacturing and strategic industries adds $500 billion annually by the end of Trump’s term, the timeline for phasing out the IRS and citizen taxation accelerates significantly. Here’s the revised outlook:

 

Timeline and Feasibility

2025: Immediate Foundations

DOGE Cuts: $1 trillion in permanent savings is realized this year, slashing discretionary spending (e.g., from $1.7 trillion to $700 billion) and trimming mandatory programs without touching Social Security or Medicare. This covers nearly half the $2.2 trillion from individual income taxes in 2023, reducing reliance on them instantly.

Tariffs Ramp Up: Trump’s January 2025 tariffs (25% on Canada/Mexico, 10% on China) expand to 100% on BRICS nations by mid-2025, per executive orders. If imports don’t collapse under this pressure, tariffs could generate $500 billion annually by year-end—far above the $80 billion in 2023—due to aggressive enforcement and a broader tax base.

IRS Downsizing: The 6,000 layoffs in February 2025 balloon to 75% of the IRS’s 80,000 workforce (60,000 jobs cut), effectively gutting its capacity to collect income taxes. A skeletal “External Revenue Service” for tariffs emerges by late 2025.

2026: Legislative Pivot

TCJA Expiration: With the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expiring December 31, 2025, Congress—assuming slim Republican majorities hold—passes a 2026 tax overhaul. Income tax is phased out, replaced by tariffs (now yielding $500 billion–$1 trillion annually) and $1 trillion in DOGE savings. The IRS is formally abolished via statute, replaced by a tariff-focused agency.

Bitcoin Reserve Launch: Trump initiates a 200,000 BTC reserve ($18 billion at $90,000/BTC) in 2026, with a goal of $100 trillion by 2050. Early gains (e.g., Bitcoin hitting $150,000 by 2027) offset $50 billion in debt interest annually, easing budget pressure.

Manufacturing Surge: Re-onshoring, fueled by tariffs and tax incentives, adds $200 billion in GDP and $50 billion in corporate tax revenue by 2026, with momentum toward $500 billion annually by 2029.

2027–2029: Full Transition

Citizen Taxation Ends: By 2027, individual income tax is zeroed out as tariffs ($1 trillion), DOGE savings ($1 trillion), and manufacturing revenue ($300 billion) cover the $2.2 trillion gap. Payroll taxes (e.g., for Social Security) might persist unless replaced by Bitcoin reserve profits or asset monetization (e.g., $100 billion from federal land leases).

Debt Offset: By 2029, the Bitcoin reserve reaches $1 trillion (BTC at $5 million), wiping out annual debt servicing costs ($1.1 trillion in 2025) and freeing up budget space. National asset monetization—oil, minerals, land—adds $200 billion annually.

State-Level Adoption: States, inspired by federal success, cut income taxes by 2029, relying on re-onshored industry revenue and federal grants from tariff surpluses.

 

1/2

Anonymous ID: db6b37 March 12, 2025, 7:14 a.m. No.22747091   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22747088

>Conversation with Grok:

>Part 3

When Might This Happen?

Assuming these optimistic ranges hold:

 

Earliest Shift: Late 2025 sees the IRS crippled and tariffs/DOGE cuts covering half the income tax revenue, with citizen taxation reduced (e.g., no tax on wages below $100,000). Full elimination could follow in 2026 if Congress acts swiftly post-TCJA.

Likely Completion: By 2027, the IRS is abolished, and income tax ends entirely, with tariffs ($1 trillion), DOGE savings ($1 trillion), manufacturing ($300 billion), and Bitcoin/asset gains ($250 billion) sustaining a $6 trillion budget. This assumes no major economic disruptions (e.g., tariff wars or Bitcoin crashes).

Long-Term Anchor: By 2050, a $100 trillion–$300 trillion Bitcoin reserve eliminates federal debt ($28 trillion in 2025, plus growth), making taxation obsolete if monetized effectively.

Caveats Even in This Scenario

Economic Stability: Tariffs at 100% could shrink imports, capping revenue below $1 trillion. Inflation or retaliation might offset manufacturing gains.

Bitcoin Risk: A $100 trillion valuation by 2050 (BTC at $5 million) assumes no regulatory bans or market implosions—possible but not guaranteed.

Political Will: Congress must align, and lawsuits (e.g., the 2025 AG challenge) must resolve in Trump’s favor.

Conclusion

If these upper-bound assumptions are true—reflecting detailed planning from Trump’s first term and flawless execution—citizen taxation could begin phasing out in late 2025, with the IRS effectively dead by 2026 and fully replaced by 2027. Tariffs, DOGE cuts, and manufacturing would bridge the gap short-term, while a Bitcoin reserve and asset monetization secure it long-term, potentially within Trump’s term ending January 20, 2029. This aggressive timeline hinges on everything breaking right, but it’s a coherent path under your framework.

 

2/2

Anonymous ID: db6b37 March 12, 2025, 7:28 a.m. No.22747141   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22747100

>anybody hear anything lately?

Turning their world upside down for a change.

 

Assault on Jason’s House

5 But the Jews [a]who were not persuaded, [b]becoming envious, took some of the evil men from the marketplace, and gathering a mob, set all the city in an uproar and attacked the house of Jason, and sought to bring them out to the people. 6 But when they did not find them, they dragged Jason and some brethren to the rulers of the city, crying out, “These who have turned the world upside down have come here too. 7 Jason has [c]harbored them, and these are all acting contrary to the decrees of Caesar, saying there is another king—Jesus.” 8 And they troubled the crowd and the rulers of the city when they heard these things. 9 So when they had taken security from Jason and the rest, they let them go.

Anonymous ID: db6b37 March 12, 2025, 7:55 a.m. No.22747256   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22746935

>Bizarre moment 'blood rain' turns beach bright red as tourists left stunned

People clearly didn't play in the red clay mud of the Virginia foothills as kids.

Anonymous ID: db6b37 March 12, 2025, 7:59 a.m. No.22747272   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7278 >>7367 >>7476

Calling it: Greenland is going to join Canada as its rightful place as part of the north American Continent. Canada saved. With that, though, the US gets a sweet contract for mineral rights since Canada is part of the USMCA.

aka, the "north american union" is expanding.