There's an interesting theory being kicked around over on the halfchan right now. It posits that:

1) Backpage. com gave them Vanguard(Keith Raniere);

2) Vanguard gave them Allison Mack;

3) Mack gave them NY AG office (Eric Schneiderman);

4) AG office gave them NYPD; and

5) NYPD gave them contents of Weiner's Laptop.

https:// boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/179985111

>>2274033 (pb)

Call me crazy, but it's 1:20 a.m. and my eyes are fading into "double-vision" mode. To me this chick leaning on Tom "BIG" Hanks's shoulder looks like Kate Spade. Well, it looks like Kate Spade before she choked to death and hanged from a doorknob, that is.

Have we made any links to Spade and Hanks? Consider this: doesn't it make sense that Hanks would not actually let an anonymous (unknown) fan get so close to him? Doesn't it seem more likely that this was someone in Hanks's inner circle?

Hmmmm. Eyes have double-vision, but I'm gonna go try to link Tom Hanks to Kate Spade, 'cause something tells me that the BIG news could be related to Tom Hanks.

That movie, by the way, came out in 1988 (according to Wikipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_(film)). This would jibe with the year during which Sara Ruth Ashcraft was young enough to have been victimized by Tom Hanks. In other words, was Hanks filiming BIG when he abused this girl? And don't y'all find it mighty strange that Tom Hanks hasn't sued Sara Ruth Ashcraft for making such shocking (if not true) claims?

Kind of reminds me of all the lawsuits that Podesta filed against Andrew Breitbart and all of the Anons who linked Podesta to Pizzagate in late 2016.

In other words, there were NO lawsuits filed, because "truth" is an affirmative defense to any and all claims of defamation.

>>2274916

Thank you, Anon. I think it's good for us to cross-check other sources, from time to time, and post the hot things we find on other sites.

>>2274933

Thanks, Anon. Good stuff from the half. WWG1WGA

>>2274875

Dumb question here. I ventured into Baking University today 'cause I'm considering that it's time to learn. Once we learn and practice, though, then we have to get verified? Is there anything we need to do?

>>2275041

Yup, I noticed that pizza, too.

It's always the goddamned pizza. . . .

>>2275054

Very good. Thanks for the info. I'll practice and get good and then when I'm ready I'll speak up. I definitely won't intentionally mess it up. I am Team Q all the way. I just want to make sure that I don't mess it up 'cause I suck, in general, sometimes.

>>2274888

Here's a reminder of a Q post found in that half-loaf. . . .

>>2275092

LOL at "fornicate"! Hahaha. I'm so used to that being a BAD thing (in part 'cause I was raised Catholic, and in part 'cause we're inundated with horrible stories about kids). So you just cracked me up. Thank you for the chuckle.

>>2275151

YEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!

But Q, for God's sake, please protect our beloved President. I seem to recall that President Kennedy wanted to do this and, well, we know how tragically that ended.

So please watch our President's back.

God bless you all.

xoxoxoxo

>>2275151

Since we're talking about our beloved President Trump, I am inferring that the words, ". . . is poised to take control of the Federal Reserve" ACTUALLY means that President Trump ALREADY HAS taken control of the Federal Reserve.

Because President Trump would never broadcast his intentions ahead of time.

So this is awesome news, and God bless you all.

>>2275151

Do it, Q!

Do it, President Delicious!