Anonymous ID: 6e9fa6 July 24, 2018, 10:23 p.m. No.2275001   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5035

>>2274965

Didn't Nostradamus reject the word "prophet" and prefer "seer?"

1999 is awfully close to 2001. "From the sky a great king of terror" that allows "mars [war] to reign" sounds a lot like 9/11.

 

1 wrong prediction means they are not a prophet of the true and living God. But I do believe some people have extrasensory abilities within themselves, and dispensation of those fruits is still filtered through their own error and bias and whatever.

Anonymous ID: 6e9fa6 July 24, 2018, 10:36 p.m. No.2275098   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2275073

Ask yourself how compliant you have to be to never have a single bad story in an entire career. How many celebrities do you know who have that honor?

Ask yourself if it's possible that some cabalists are given public roles just so they can be as acclaimed and respected to the masses as they are to the occult circles.

Anonymous ID: 6e9fa6 July 24, 2018, 10:43 p.m. No.2275149   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5201

Weird the amount of PUSHBACK there is into digging on Hanks. Especially with a vocal person claiming to be one of his victims.

 

Regardless of what's true, have you seen so much pushback into digging on someone before? Organic? What genuine anons discourage other anons from seeking opensource info that may lead to new discoveries?

Anonymous ID: 6e9fa6 July 24, 2018, 10:49 p.m. No.2275238   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5254

>>2275201

You aren't paying attention, then. Anons are looking through social media, old entertainment connections, symbolism.

 

Something odd with the knee-jerk Hanks defenders on here. No opinion, personally, at the moment. But genuine anons need to kill their heroes. If you don't support something, don't give it a (you). But let anons dig.

Anonymous ID: 6e9fa6 July 24, 2018, 10:53 p.m. No.2275289   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>2275262

Brother, if you don't see an issue with posting multiple pictures of your children on a board like this one, then I don't know what to tell you. But you are putting them in danger.

If you don't see the moral qualms in putting pictures of your children on a board largely about CHILD SEX TRAFFICKING VICTIMS AND PERPETRATORS, then I don't know what to tell you.

Your children are not memes for you to whore out for (yous). They are human beings who have no way to consent to their image being shown to millions of people, include some of the most evil scum on this planet and pedophiles.

Give them privacy.

Your conscience is either failing you, or you are a bad actor.

Anonymous ID: 6e9fa6 July 24, 2018, 11:01 p.m. No.2275382   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

Honestly thought the Fed would have to wait until term 2. This is excellent news.

What's left for term 2? Cancer cures? Cold fusion? Perpetual clean energy? Just spit balling here, but feel free to deliver, Q.

Anonymous ID: 6e9fa6 July 24, 2018, 11:03 p.m. No.2275410   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5439

>>2275367

Don't get all socialist on us, anon. Perhaps some amount of debt forgiveness. Perhaps US gov seizing ill-gotten gains. Perhaps an elimination of income tax.

But I don't think they're going to take the red shield's trillions and cut a check to all the anons.

But, you know, feel free to prove me wrong on that point, Q.

Anonymous ID: 6e9fa6 July 24, 2018, 11:11 p.m. No.2275507   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5534

>>2275477

Anon, this is why the lengthy timeline where it feels like nothing is happening. All strings are being cut.

Once the strings are cut, POTUS can do whatever tf he wants to the Federal Reserve without so much as idle curiosity if he's annoying anybody.