>>22752571
>>22752568
>>22752567
>>22752564
>>22752560
>>22752557
>>22752554
SMELL THE FEAR
EVERYTHING EVERYTHING? KEK
Donald J. Trump@realDonaldTrump
https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114147788974149994
SoMassiecan vote for Debt Ceiling AND Budget to be put into the Trump Administration, making them both the Republicans problem and responsibility, but can’t give us a simple Continuing Resolution vote allowing us the time necessary to come up with a “GREAT, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL??? Republicans only “NO Vote. GRANDSTANDER!
Mar 12, 2025, 1:23 AM
123
Nov 06, 2017 5:07:57 PM EST
Anonymous ID: KKIreCTB No. 148289594
Nothing is random.
Everything has meaning.
+++
Q
Massie has been outspoken against the American Israel Public Affairs Committee and its influence on American politics, and in December 2023 tweeted out a meme appearing to contrast Zionism with American patriotism.[102]
In May 2024, AIPAC and allied groups announced a $300,000 ad campaign targeting Massie for perceived “anti-Israel views” while not officially endorsing any primary challenger.[103]
Massie responded by posting a poll on X asking his followers whether AIPAC should be forced to register as a foreign agent.[104]
In a June 2024 interview, he claimed that each Republican member of Congress besides himself has an "AIPAC person" that directs them to vote in line with the positions of the organization.[105]
In 2019, Massie was the only member of Congress to oppose an act that refused to recognize Russia's annexation of Crimea.[106]
He was also one of three members to oppose a March 2022 resolution supporting Ukraine's sovereignty after it was invaded by Russia.[107][106]
He later amplified Russian claims that Ukraine was developing biological weapons. Referring to Victoria Nuland's statement that Ukraine had biological research facilities that the U.S. feared might be seized by Russia, Massie tweeted, "I didn’t take the concern over Ukrainian biological labs seriously … until now."[108]
Massie opposed a resolution in 2022 to support Sweden and Finland joining NATO, saying he did not want to "subsidize socialist Europe's defense".[109]
In March 2024 he voted against House Resolution 149 condemning the illegal abduction and forcible transfer of children from Ukraine to the Russian Federation, one of nine Republicans to do so.[110]
Massie voted "present" on the 2015 Iran nuclear agreement, the only member of the House to do so and the only Republican not to vote against it.[111]
Massie was the only member of the House to vote against extending sanctions on Iran in 2016.[112]
He was also one of only three House members to vote against a 2017 bill to impose new sanctions on Iran, Russia, and North Korea.[113]
Massie is a part of a small group of Republicans who voted against a House resolution reaffirming commitment to the orderly and peaceful transfer of power in the United States under democratic principles.[181][182]
He was also one of seven Republicans who did not support their colleagues' efforts to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election on January 6, 2021; these seven signed a letter that, while giving credence to election fraud allegations made by President Donald Trump, said Congress did not have the authority to influence the election's outcome.[183]
Massie endorsed Florida Governor Ron DeSantis for president in the 2024 election, saying that "America needs a leader who is decisive, respects the Constitution, understands policy, puts family first, and leads by inspiring".[189]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Massie
ARE YOU [COMFY]?
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: b189f8 No. 130638 Jan 22, 2018 9:47:32 PM EST 586
What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family?
What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved?
Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22].
This is only the beginning.
Be careful what you wish for.
AS THE WORLD TURNS.
Could messages such as those be publicly disclosed?
What happens to the FBI?
What happens to the DOJ?
What happens to special counsel?
What happens in general?
Every FBI/DOJ prev case could be challenged.
Lawless.
Think logically.
We haven’t started the drops re: human trafficking / sacrifices [yet][worst].
Those [good] who know cannot sleep.
Those [good] who know cannot find peace.
Those [good] who know will not rest until those responsible are held accountable.
Nobody can possibly imagine the pure evil and corruption out there.
Those you trust are the most guilty of sin.
Who are we taught to trust?
If you arereligious, PRAY.
60% must remain private [at least] - for humanity.
These people should be hanging.
Q
Aug 28, 2018 7:14:35 PM EDT Q Drop #1966
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI ID: f71ada No. 2773258
Aug 28, 2018 7:12:21 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: d8fac5 No. 2773199
>>2773040
Will be glorious?
In my humble opinion sir, it ALREADY is.
>>2773199
In our opinion, until those responsible are dead and/or suffering, it shall remain 'will be'.
Q
1103
Apr 09, 2018 12:58:45 PM EDT
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 7ec299 No. 967161
Apr 09, 2018 12:56:35 PM EDT
Anonymous ID: 97b366 No. 967123
>>967105
Not mine, No FB.
;)
>>967123
YOU are being TRACKED.
NO FB account required.
This is BIGGER than you think.
Agencies attached.
Q
>>22752810
>>22752817
>>22752820
>>22752826
>>22752832
>>22752834
‘Absolute liars': Ex-D.C. Guard official says generals lied to Congress about Jan. 6Part II
At the time, Piatt was the director of Army staff, one of the top generals in the Pentagon, and Flynn was the Army’s director of operations. The two men were the highest-ranking Army officials who spoke on the 2:30 call, according to Matthews.
“LTG Piatt stated that it would not be his best military advice to recommend to the Secretary of the Army that the D.C. National Guard be allowed to deploy to the Capitol at that time,” Matthews wrote, adding: “LTGs Piatt and Flynn stated that the optics of having uniformed military personnel deployed to the U.S. Capitol would not be good.”
Piatt and Flynn suggested instead that Guardsmen take over D.C. police officers’ traffic duties so those officers could head to the Capitol, Matthews continues.
In addition to Matthews’ memo, POLITICO also obtained a document produced by a D.C. Guard official and dated Jan. 7 that lays out a timeline of Jan. 6. The D.C. Guard timeline, a separate document whose author took notes during the call, also said that Piatt and Flynn at 2:37 p.m. “recommended for DC Guard to standby,” rather than immediately deploying to the Capitol during the riot.
Four minutes later, according to that Guard timeline, Flynn again “advised D.C. National Guard to standby until the request has been routed” to then-Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy and then-acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller.
Everyone on the call was “astounded” except Piatt and Flynn, Matthews wrote.
Both men, however, later denied to Congress that they had said the Guard shouldn’t deploy to the Capitol.
In response to a written question from House Oversight Committee Chair Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) in June about whether Piatt advised anyone in the Guard’s chain of command not to deploy directly to the Capitol, Piatt wrote, “At no point on January 6 did I tell anyone that the D.C. National Guard should not deploy directly to the Capitol.”
That statement, Matthews says in his memo, is “false and misleading.”
Walker also testified to Congress in March that Piatt and Flynn expressed concerns about “optics.”
Further, Flynn told Maloney that he “never expressed a concern about the visuals, image, or public perception of” sending Guardsmen to the Capitol.
That answer, Matthews says in his memo, is “outright perjury.”
Matthews wrote that he and Walker “heard Flynn identify himself and unmistakably heard him say that optics of a National Guard presence on Capitol Hill was an issue for him. That it would not look good. Either Piatt or Flynn mentioned ‘peaceful protestors.’”
Flynn’s brother, retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, promulgated a host of conspiracy theories in the lead-up to Jan. 6 and called for former President Donald Trump to impose martial law. Matthews’ memo does not insinuate that Gen. Charles Flynn’s actions on Jan. 6 were shaped by his brother, who has been subpoenaed by the select committee, and does not mention Michael Flynn.
The two generals told the House oversight committee that the Guard wasn’t ready to respond to the chaos that day, and Flynn testified to the House Oversight Committee in June that a “team of over 40 officers and non-commissioned officers immediately worked to recall the 154 D.C. National Guard personnel from their current missions, reorganize them, re-equip them, and begin to redeploy them to the Capitol.” Matthews says that assertion “constituted the willful deception of Congress.”
“If it does not constitute the willful and deliberate misleading of Congress, then nothing does,” Matthews wrote of Flynn’s statement. “Flynn was referring to 154 D.C. Guardsmen who were already on duty, were trained in civil disturbance response, already had area familiarization with Washington, DC, were properly kitted and were delayed only because of inaction and inertia at the Pentagon.”
In other words, Matthews indicates, the idea that it took 40 officers to get 154 National Guard personnel ready to go to the Capitol beggars belief.
Every D.C. Guard leader was desperate to get to the Capitol to help, Matthews writes — then stunned by the delay in deployment. Responding to civil unrest in Washington is “a foundational mission, a statutory mission of the D.C. National Guard,” his memo notes.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777
‘Absolute liars': Ex-D.C. Guard official says generals lied to Congress about Jan. 6Part III
That report states that McCarthy had to call Walker twice on Jan. 6 to order him to deploy the D.C. Guard. Matthews’ memo calls this “an outrageous assertion … as insulting as it is false,” and says McCarthy himself was “incommunicado or unreachable for most of the afternoon.”
The inspector general’s report says McCarthy arrived at the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department at 4:05 p.m., and that “witnesses told us that not having heard from MG Walker regarding any specific plan.” McCarthy and others present, including D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser and D.C. Police Chief Robert Contee, themselves drafted a comprehensive plan for the Guard’s deployment, according to the Pentagon watchdog.
The report further says that soon afterward, Miller and Gen. Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, reviewed that plan over the phone. Miller authorized the deployment of the D.C. Guard and McCarthy informed Walker of it during a call at 4:35 p.m; McCarthy then held apress conference with the D.C. mayor and called Walker again to reissue the order that he deploy the Guard, according to the Pentagon inspector general.
Matthews challenges that Jan. 6 timetable in his memo. He writes that D.C. Guard leaders “still have not seen this so-called plan developed by McCarthy and allegedly approved by Acting Secretary Miller at 4:32PM.” He adds that the idea that the Army secretary would give Guard personnel support for tactical planning and coordination is “patently absurd.”
Walker, meanwhile, has said no call happened between him and McCarthy at 4:35 p.m. The D.C. Guard’s Jan. 6 timeline — produced while Walker helmed the D.C. National Guard — does not document any phone call between McCarthy and Walker at 4:35.
Both McCarthy and Miller declined to comment.
Megan Reed, a spokesperson for the Pentagon inspector general, said their office stands by its report.
Matthews’ memo also homes in on a document that Army officials have referenced but never fully revealed, titled “Report of the Army’s Operations on January 6 2021.” In Matthews’ view, it lays out a fabricated timeline in a bid to burnish the Army’s reputation.
According to Matthews, Piatt helped produce the document after a series of bruising congressional hearings and news reports that damaged the reputations of Army senior leadership — among them, a Washington Post report that the Army falsely denied Flynn’s participation in the 2:30 p.m. phone call.
“In March 2021, MG Walker was told by a friend that LTG Piatt was so upset with MG Walker that he directed the development of an Army ‘White Paper’ to retell events of 6 January in a light more favorable to LTGs Flynn, Piatt, Secretary McCarthy and the Army Staff,” Matthews writes.
The Army Staff ultimately sought “to create an alternate history which would be the Army’s official recollection of events,” Matthews continues, adding: “The end product, a revisionist tract worthy of the best Stalinist or North Korea propagandist, was close hold,” kept secret from the public.
But members of Congress have seen the document. Piatt referenced it during a House Oversight Committee hearing in June when asked about conflicting recollections of the afternoon of Jan. 6.
“I would refer to the U.S. Army Report of Operations on January 6 that we submitted to this committee,” Piatt told lawmakers. “What the D.C. National Guard did in those short hours was extraordinary. Now when people’s lives are on the line, two minutes is too long. But we were not positioned to respond to that urgent request. We had to re-prepare so we would send them in prepared for … this new mission.”
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/12/06/jan-6-generals-lied-ex-dc-guard-official-523777
>>22752909
1156
11 = double time
1156 x 2 = 2312
NIGHT SHIFT PRESENTS "ALL YOUR [ELON] IS OUR ]ELON[ NOW"
ENJOY
Jan 19, 2018 3:11:44 AM EST#560
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 000000 No. 41
Why are American taxpayers subsidizingTesla?
Welfare for the rich.
Why?
Private emails: GOOG:NK: Tesla
The MEMO is ONLY THE BEGINNING>
THE SHOT HEARD AROUND THE WORLD.
Q
Nov 23, 2017 12:05:13 AM EST#209
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 66o6MRSe No. 150562694
Why did BO scuttle the shuttle program?
What is SpaceX?
Expand your thinking.
Q
Nov 23, 2017 12:10:13 AM EST#210
Q !ITPb.qbhqo ID: 66o6MRSe No. 150563217
NK _ SpaceX.
Q
Dec 22, 2017 1:13:36 AM EST#428
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 5902e7 No. 146268
Dec 22, 2017 1:04:31 AM EST
Anonymous ID: f6add3 No. 146142
Missile tech/guidance cap is SpaceX tech, methinks. Via Obama possibly?
Amirite q?
>>146142
Why isEMprovided BIG WW subsidies?
No subsidies = ?
Clowncontribution in exchange for access code?
Why relevant?
Amazon Echo?
Google Home?
Clown contributions?
Apple Face ID Tech?
FB Face ID Tech?
Catching on?
Bombs Away.
Q
Dec 23, 2017 1:12:33 AM EST438
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 78f9ff No. 154238
2011 Shuttle Program terminated by Hussein.
US loses space dominance.
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2017/08/09/obama-administration-knew-about-north-koreas-miniaturized-nukes.html
IRAN Nuke deal.
NK Nuke/Missile Tech.
SpaceX.
NASA Tech to ?
HRC SAPs (private server).
Connected.
$$$,$$$,$$$.00 (pockets).
EYE OF RA.
Left eye [marker].
Symbolism.
EVIL.
STUPID.
JUSTICE.
Q
Dec 23, 2017 1:44:16 AM EST439
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 78f9ff No. 154468
Dec 23, 2017 1:32:47 AM EST
Anonymous ID: 7cda9d No. 154372
>>154238
Q posts missing letter"i"are markers?
>>154372
What rocket fired today?
[i]
Message sent.
Q
Dec 23, 2017 1:49:14 AM EST441
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 78f9ff No. 154535
Dec 23, 2017 1:45:17 AM EST
Anonymous ID: b04d48 No. 154477
>>154468
Iridium?
>>154477
Future news will unlock more of the message.
Missing [i] confirmed.
Q
Dec 23, 2017 1:53:22 AM EST442
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 78f9ff No. 154583
Dec 23, 2017 1:46:21 AM EST
Anonymous ID: 50e089 No. 154493
2017-12-23 00_46_02-Elon Musk on Twitter_ _Nuclear alien UFO from North Koreahttps___t.co_GUIHpKkkp.png
Media Keywords:space x launch picture nk north korea ufo detraction
Media Keywords Contributor(s): justkeke8
>>154468
>>154493
Message back.
UFO put out to detract from drops.
Q
Dec 23, 2017 2:02:58 AM EST443
Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 78f9ff No. 154682
Dec 23, 2017 1:59:14 AM EST
Anonymous ID: 6763ae No. 154644
>>154583
I'm from SoCal, everybody worked their ass off to win in space, so many people that made a lot of money in the 70s till 80s, it was a dream to make your country the greatest on earth, so many dreams destroyed, a fountain of talent squashed and sold out, it really hurts, we really cried when we watched each shuttle launch and knew we did that
>>154644
It's coming back in a big way.
Space is critical to our NAT SEC.
Was terminated for a specific reason.
Godspeed, Patriot.
Q
Elon Musk @elonmusk
Let’s set an age limit after which you can’t run for political office, perhaps a number just below 70 …
3:47 AM · Dec 2, 2021
Elon Musk @elonmusk
Trump would be 82 at end of term, which is too old to be chief executive of anything, let alone the United States of America.
If DeSantis runs against Biden in 2024, then DeSantis will easily win – he doesn’t even need to campaign.
10:16 PM · Jul 11, 2022
GUARDIANS OF THE PEDOPHILES!
PAYSEUR PART 3: [P]=Payseur Confirmed. Q Lounge Live 8/28
"PART 3 Q CONFIRMS [P]=Payseur from of my very FIRST EVER presentation on the [P]=Payseur on 8/26/18 from our July dig with host @ShadyGrooove."
Q confirms [P] = Payseur!
"In the Vatican - Holy See Q Drop #1950 "Recipe for ……." Q meant P,A,Y,S,E,U,R".
https://rumble.com/v17fgrt-q-lounge-live-payseur-part-3.html
https://youtu.be/4Nol07Dmo7M
https://rumble.com/embed/v14tatr/?pub=4
Q DROP #1950
Holy See Corrupt Universal Government of the Catholic Church
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 28 Aug 2018 - 4:12:23 PM
U.S.-HOLY SEE RELATIONS
"The Holy See is the universal government of the Catholic Church and operates from Vatican City State, a sovereign, independent territory. The Pope is the ruler of both Vatican City State and the Holy See. The Holy See, as the supreme body of government of the Catholic Church, is a sovereign juridical entity under international law."
https://www.state.gov/r/pa/ei/bgn/3819.htm
Wealth?
Power?
Sanctuary against criminal prosecution?
Recipe for …….
Q
Q Drop #416
Anonymous 12/21/2017 20:31:58 ID: deb9fa
8chan/cbts: 143329
Soros takes orders fromP.
You have no idea how sick and evil these people are.
Fight, fight, fight.
Day of days.
Game over.
Q
Q DROP #1413
Guardian of the Pope Owl Photo
Q !4pRcUA0lBE 17 May 2018 - 8:15:27 PM
Guardian_P.png
Guardian of thePope.
[Personal]
Q
PAYSEUR PART 4: TRUST the Plan 12/14 Q Lounge Live #Qarmy
"Starting at 20:00 after we go over the Q linkING to to my Twitter once again. Q2582.
Part 4 PAYSEUR, TRUST the Plan with myself and host @ShadyGrooove. Bringing ALL the PAYSEUR information to today!"
"A 1000 year old illusion!"
"Conspiracy analysts"
"Q uses the word Trust all the time"
"The mirror of Trust is anti Trust!"
"Trust trust trust!"
"When Q says "TRUST the plan" Q is referring to the Payseur trust!"
"it's not Pope, it's not Pindar, it is Payseur!"
https://rumble.com/v188h6f-q-lounge-live-trust-the-plan-payseur-part-4.html
https://youtu.be/SYC-owQuIeE
https://rumble.com/embed/v15mb8n/?pub=4
WHAT DO YOU THINK [THEY] ARE GATEKEEPING?