This is clam baker and his little butt buddy team
Notables are not endorsements
We have that saying for a reason.
It's not up to bakers to decide what is good sauce or not when 8+ anons nom a notable.
It's up to bakers to compile information that ANONS find notable, not to tell anons what to think.
If the notable ends up not helping anyone or ends up being disinfo, fine.
Notables are not endorsements.
But to nip it in the bud, especially when there is sauce, is suspect.
u mad ebot
Welcome to the woke club.
Remove first line of notables to preserve baker objectivity
Your James P. Warburg post sounds gay as shit that's why no one nominated it
Yep. But they'll call you a (((shill))) for saying so. Meanwhile "clambaker" puts his own shitty post that no one nominated in notables
It's shit, no one likes it, and you're a dumbass for writing it and thinking it's good.
That James P Warburg post wasn't nominated really think you should take it out of notables to preserve the integrity of the bakers
Don't forget that's clambaker doing that