Guillini explained on L. Inghram that he and Trump were told it was leaked, so they decided to listen to it (5 times) and nothing was on it,
so they agreed to let it be released.
And, it is no big deal and nothing illegal. He did not end up buying the rights to the story from the Enquirer.
But, he could have if he wanted. Perfectly legal.
Guillini said there are no more tapes.
I am a researcher and spend many hours digging.
Calling anons shills because they care about having great Notables for other anons to catch up on is ridiculous.
I was only reading last bread and usually suggest Notables when I see them to help out bakers.
With your and clams attitude it makes me not want to research, or help with Notables as long as clam is baking now.
Fuck you assholes for degrading this place by turning it in to a baker power trip.
You do realize that states have special named Days everyday?
Check and see what Utah day it was the day before or after.
Not notable.
Please. Get clam out of here.
Do you strut around your little studio with a tiny dick hard-on because you feel so POWERFUL here?
I was FOR the Munchin and against the shitty ass opinion notables that were put in instead.
One being the bakers.
My only problem is when anons are ignored when suggesting notables they agree with.
Over it and over researching for the night, why bother.
Thank you for clarifying. Carry on.
Glad you looked. That seemed odd to me too. I never saw that Cohen was his attorney.
And no, it was not busy the last 2 breads.
There has been NO sauce yet that Cohen was Epstein's lawyer.
You are a breath of fresh air! Notables are a team effort between anons and baker.
Some bakers use notables as a power trip and to push their own agendas.
Once you are on duty, I will resume research and helping collect notables.
There is SO MUCH corruption we have found with help from Q and others.
It is mind-blowing. Just having a few corruption-gates is already overwhelming,
but, there is just massive amounts to keep track of.
Thanks for the reminder of the gmails and ES involvement in it (along with ES/NK too!)
Well, we will see if he ends it or just re-structures the Fed.
I remember Bronfman arrest and I even suggested it Notable.
Baker ignored it, and I requested it next bread and ignored again.
This was Bronfman's actual arrest that happened just hours prior. Highly notable.
Finally other anons joined in and asked why baker was refusing.
I am not a shill, but only a concerned researcher and notable collector.
When important timely research and news is ignored and not put in,
it causes problems. Also, who wants to research or search for recent news if it is ignored by Baker,
even though other anons are suggesting it.
This does not even address the personal agendas this baker loads the notables with.
Well shit, can't you drop the link or at least the candidates name?
It would have been nice to read at least a paragraph.
You are on your own. It is clear you don't interact with anons for the best of Notables.
You have turned off diggers and turned Notables to shit.
Quit calling diggers and researchers shills.
Keep it up and you won't have any left. You sound like the left calling people nazis because you won't discuss the problem.
I am a digger and not a shill. There are some, but quit dismissing the rest of us real anons FFS
Of course its not hard to find idiot.
Why just post a fucking headline and NOTHING else.
Don't even bother lazy.