RE: Global Migration and credits
Western countries are in deep debt.
If you want to get a credit from a bank,
you have to list your assets.
Q said "Migrants are assets".
In former days owner of slave plantations, Kings and other rich people could list their slaves or serfs as assets,
when asking for more credit.
Does it make sense (in a weird way) to push illegal immigration and to legalise illegal Immigrants,
because you can then claim that all these young(!) people will work so many years
and make a special amount of money for the state(!), so that you, as a state,
can pawn their future work/ productivity for getting more/ higher credit?
Is this the reason, why western states see immigrants as assets?
Is this the reason, why Q stated that we are "slaves, sheep, pawns" to them?
They can borrow more money, by pledging our future estimated work performance.
And if they need more credit, they just import more pawns, sheep, slaves and give them citizenship.