Anonymous ID: 26cab4 ATTN: BAKER July 25, 2018, 4:34 a.m. No.2277705   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Would you PLEASE return to the Time Honored Standard of naming the threads:

Q Research General #xxxx [then whatever you like]

 

When you don not, you necessitate all of us who are Archiving threads to delete and then rename them every time you do this in order to maintain any kind of sort order.

 

It's hard enough to keep up and participate without your inattention adding to the overhead involved.

 

Thank You In Advance for CORRECTING this in future threads.

Anonymous ID: 26cab4 July 25, 2018, 5:02 a.m. No.2277882   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2277814

Most people anymore lack the upbringing and intestinal fortitude to blatantly and immediately reject injustice, social or otherwise.

 

Years of this PC bullshit has rendered an entire generation to be no more than useless pussies scared of their shadow. They are so confused they call themselves Social Justice Warriors and act like strung out libtards.

 

The frustrating part is that they can't figure out the things they fear are only there because they allow and foster it.

Anonymous ID: 26cab4 Thread Titles July 25, 2018, 5:11 a.m. No.2277937   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7952 >>7956

Since I'm being called a shill, I guess I will have to type slower so all you cool, smarter than me people can understand.

 

Over 2800+ threads on THIS board have been named in the fashion of:

Q Research General #xxxx [then wtf ever you like]

When the baker omits "GENERAL" in the middle of that and it is Archived as such, I does not show up in sequence and appears to missing to whoever may attempt to access it later.

Hence, it must be deleted and re-downloaded with the correct name (to include GENERAL). Then the original Archive needs deleted because it is crap and can not be found anyway.

 

This is not a big deal, but for those of us with a life and not enough to spend here to start with, this additional overhead consumes time that was not available to start with and can easily be prevented by the Baker being aware of the issue he is creating.

 

I didn't call any bakers CLOWNS or point out that's what it looks like, because we are all on the same side. I in fact, thanked you in advance for your consideration.

 

Those to simple to understand the concept of SORT ORDER during a computer search, will no doubt continue to call me a baker shill and when you do, everybody reading it will be thinking clown baker, NOT that I'm a shill for making such a polite and simplistic request.