Anonymous ID: b2119c March 17, 2025, 6:05 p.m. No.22777890   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7906

>>22777883

(lb/pb)

 

Stephen Miller has spent the last 4 years researching exactly how this would go down…

 

He’s been sitting at his desk, reading 18th century laws and forgotten Supreme Court cases until 2am under the light of a lone burning candle.

 

CNN anchors are not prepared for this.

 

 

https://x.com/Geiger_Capital/status/1901754973009940977

Anonymous ID: b2119c March 17, 2025, 6:38 p.m. No.22778029   🗄️.is 🔗kun

If a judge lacks a signed oath of office for their position, it could raise questions about their legal authority to act in that role. In most jurisdictions, an oath of office is a formal requirement for public officials, including judges, to affirm their commitment to uphold the law and perform their duties faithfully. The specifics depend on the legal system in question—whether it’s a state, federal, or other jurisdiction.

 

For example, in the United States, federal judges are required under Article VI of the Constitution to take an oath before performing their duties, and state judges typically have similar mandates under state laws or constitutions. Without a signed oath, a judge’s rulings or actions might be challenged as invalid due to a lack of proper swearing-in. Historically, courts have sometimes ruled that technical defects (like a missing or unsigned oath) don’t automatically void a judge’s actions if they were otherwise acting under color of law—so-called "de facto" authority—but this can vary case by case.