Baker why did you not include the
Dan Coats, Director of National Intelligence visited NZ shortly after Hillary?
It was not mine - but VERY NOTABLE.
Thank God. You really fucked up Notables all night long.
A lot of great Notables were ignored.
But, yet you managed to put one of your own opinion pieces in.
Who ever posted that DAN COATS NZ post last bread, please re-post it - Baker ignored my clear bold NOTABLE for it,
so it can get put in Notables. It was very important due to Q's post about FVEY.
I need sleep…
WTF? Q just got done posting about FVEY, NZ and Security Clearance with Hillary.
And Dan Coats the Director of National Intelligence visited NZ right after Hillary
AND YOU DON'T THINK THAT IS FUCKING NOTABLE??
I'm sorry, but your ability to determine Notables sucked all night.
Many current important Notables were ignored by you.
And you didn't have "too many newsy items" - you filled those Notables (before this last one) with
OPINION PIECES (including one of your own).
It wasn't my post - I just boldly marked it Notable in last bread and titled it.
I am exhausted and 6 hours past sleep trying to watch the Notables.
If someone else would please get it or have the person repost if they are here.
It also included BHO that visited after that.
It was 3/4 down and before baker posted their Notable list.
Good night anons, long night and sun coming up.
And Q said it was going to be restructured.
Actually he replied to someone who ask if Fed would be ended and Q replied:
Structure.
You can screen grab it.
On Mac command/shift/4 let go, then scroll over what you want to grab then let go.
There are actually both.
The shills are very easy to spot. But, there are many real anons who are/were concerned with
clam baking last night. Very important notables were ignored even though 2-4 people requesting notable.
And then clam putting in opinions and crap with no sauce instead.
Then clam would proceed to attack us diggers and anons concerned calling us shills.
When people spend time digging and post a very notable post,
it is very discouraging when you know other anons waking up might like to see it.
Then, people have to rediscover it all over again. Waste of everyone's time.
TY Baker
Now newfags this is a shill saying "baker is compted"
They usually use red text and have high post count.
BUT, there are also actual anons that post concerns when needed.
Claire already in Notables yesterday evening.
Spot on is obective and should be determined by reader.
tY Baker.
You are a fresh breath compared to clam
Last night we were anons who were requesting OTHER ANON's posts.
Q had just posted, so there was digging going on like usual with important info found.
Baker was ignoring it.
It had nothing to do with people wanting their posts in. Yes, that does happen - but was not the case last night.
Did you see the Notables from last night? Especially the last 3?
TY Baker