Anonymous ID: 9e6a20 March 19, 2025, 1:07 a.m. No.22786657   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6658

>>22786631

SWAT is primarily made up of tactical faggots who are denied exposure to the Constitution and or members who actually REVEL in their ignorance, and/or direct defiance, of the Bill of Rights.

It is the only way to get men to do such corrupted work. It should be swatted out of existance.

CHANGE MY MIND!

Anonymous ID: 9e6a20 March 19, 2025, 1:31 a.m. No.22786692   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6694 >>6705

>>22786652

Passed a restaurant table where 9 LEOs had gathered for a meal break together. At great risk to my own life and limb, i dared to address them as a 'monolithic' group. I offered to buy breakfast for the entire group, if even ONE of them could tell me the primary principle foundation of the Constitution and Bill of Rights ('to limit government intrusion upon the lives of people').

 

Basically all i got from them was mostly blank silence and a few uncomfortable snickers. So i kept my money and walked away.

Anonymous ID: 9e6a20 March 19, 2025, 1:52 a.m. No.22786708   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6727

>>22786694

My area is somewhat unique with a geographic convergence of several many jurisdictions, local, sheriff and state patrol with plainclothes Feds everywhere. I think it is somewhat nice that they get together and sit down in public. Their 'clutch' has been growing in size and regularity for the past few years at my local diners.

 

What disgusts me, is their ignorance (or intention) to foul the otherwise pleasant mood of the regular public. Either they have accepted that as an unfortunate part of "just doing my job"โ€ฆ or they LIKE it. I honestly can't tell which it is. Is genuine 'Officer Friendly' completely dead?

Anonymous ID: 9e6a20 March 19, 2025, 3:52 a.m. No.22786893   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>6897 >>6900 >>6914 >>6920

>>22786881

I was being a little tongue-in-cheek-y,

But i appreciate you highlighting what wasn't highlighted. It appears that some Russians were TRYING to PREVENT an assassination. The Cold War was shitty and economically destructive for everyone. Might Kennedy have been interested in ending it in the mid 60's if he hadn't been killed?

Anonymous ID: 9e6a20 March 19, 2025, 4:25 a.m. No.22786963   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>22786945

I got ya,

It was a psyop (by the "IC") for trillions on (hookers and blow while) pretending absurd weapons systems into needless existence and the massive apparatus of population controlโ€ฆ and then when the Cold War ended by the precipice of bankruptcy, 9/11 came along to whip the whole shit show to up to another level.

 

I hate the dummies in the so-called "IC".

Anonymous ID: 9e6a20 March 19, 2025, 4:36 a.m. No.22787001   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>7024 >>7034

>>22786967

One big problem We have in this moment in time, is the shear volume of EXTRA material that shitposters, A.I. and counter-operations can generate so fast and flood the zoneโ€ฆ making it so hard to parse true material from fake material.

 

I'm gonna have to sit back just wait and see.

I do not know how to deal with the massive volume of good and true material, let alone how to separate out the false/fake stuff.