seconded ask for source. i want to look at the document directly on the current release archive.
clown handles do it intentionally too.
and "mj" is the only one I've seen telling this (specific) story, so i'm considering it false until source surfaces. if they want to play the same gatekeeper "look what i know, just trust me bruh" they are no better than the original redactors.
see, you rock.
notable
the mjultra comment
>
>After reading it in its entirety, Angleton was >clearly in bed with Israeli intelligence, dark >elements within the CIA, our own government, >and possibly “Five Eyes nations” or elements >within.
appears false based on some of Angleton's initial remarks.
excerpts from that link (capped at the top of the big one)
everything is still spin.