-
Brexit Mekon to get back in the thick of it in the UK? Farage dines with Cummings *
Dominic Cummings breaks silence after secret dinner with Nigel Farage
Former top Johnson aide says he ‘might spend more time on SW1’ after revelation of meeting before Christmas
Daniel Boffey Chief reporter
Mon 24 Mar 2025 05.00 GMT
Civil servants may wish to dust off their CVs. Members of parliament, brace, brace, brace. Dominic Cummings – the political weather-maker behind the tide that delivered Brexit and raised and drowned Boris Johnson – is eyeing up a Westminster come back, of sorts.
“I might spend more time on SW1 depending how things play out,” Cummings told the Guardian after speculation about his intentions in the Westminster postcode, “but I do not want a job there. My efforts will only be helping people of any party pushing in what I consider a good direction, I’m happy living away from SW1 and SW1 for sure feels the same about me.”
The trigger for a renewed interest in the beanie-wearing politico from Durham, memorably portrayed by Benedict Cumberbatch in Brexit: The Uncivil War, has been the recent revelation of a secret dinner with Nigel Farage shortly before Christmas.
It has prompted much excitement in Westminster. The two men were daggers drawn for a number of years, partly as a result of a clash between their respective organisations (Cummings’ Vote Leave of which he was campaign director and the Farageist Grassroots Out) over which would be the official Brexit campaign group.
Farage described Cummings, who went on to be Johnson’s chief adviser in Downing Street, as a “horrible nasty little man”. Last summer, Cummings said the re-emergence of Farage on the political scene was “depressing”, adding that “15% of the country [is] pretty much like Farage and hates everybody else”. He warned that Farage did not offer solutions.
It was something of a turn-up, then, for the two men to break bread. Of the dinner, the Reform leader has said only that they talked “about the blob and what were the practical problems of coming into government and not being able to do what you wanted to do”.
In his first public comments about the meeting, Cummings said it had been a “friendly chat”.
The focus, the 53-year-old added, had been “the core problems that we have a broken Whitehall, a disgraceful and shattered Tory party clogging up the party system, how to shake it all up most effectively. And how to bring some of the great people in this country now excluded from government into it to replace the shitshow we all have to live with every day.”
“The current crop of MPs and officials by definition can’t fix themselves,” Cummings said. “It needs an outside force – just as the vaccine taskforce or rapid tests or sewage monitoring did in 2020, successful only because of forces external to Whitehall forcing Whitehall to act differently against its default mode.”
Cummings had pressed on Farage the need for him to build credible policies in order to recruit top-quality candidates and attract donors, it is understood.
Nigel Farage addresses the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in National Harbor, Maryland.
View image in fullscreen
Nigel Farage, pictured, once dismissed Dominic Cummings as a ‘horrible nasty little man’. Photograph: Nathan Howard/Reuters
In turn, Farage, 60, is said to have made a nod to his own mortality. Reform may be on a trajectory to win 100 seats at the next election in 2029, putting the party in the position where it could execute a reverse take over of the Conservative party.
But Farage would be nudging at Lord Palmerston’s record as Britain’s oldest first-time prime minister should he be successful against Keir Starmer in 2035. He would be into his 80s by the end of a second term, should that come to pass.
Farage said “he didn’t want to wait until 2035 so wanted to win a majority in 2029”, Cummings said.
Not everyone who knows the maverick political strategist is convinced that he would turn down an opportunity to be part of that.
“Farage is – much like Boris, although in different ways – a deeply flawed individual,” said a friend. “So the question is, do you just throw your toys out the pram and say all of the lead actors are shit, I don’t want to work with them, plague on all their houses? Or do you try and work with the cranks that the political process has chucked up? I think he’s probably found himself in the latter camp.”