24 Mar, 2025 11:54

Israeli diplomat suggests ‘killing off’ teenagers in Gaza – leaked VIDEO

Palestinian minors should face a death sentence if they are seen carrying arms, David Roet has said

Israeli’s ambassador to Austria, David Roet, has insisted that Palestinian teenagers in Gaza should be put to death if they are spotted carrying a weapon, according to a leaked recording that went viral on social media last week.

The secret two-minute recording, dated March 20, apparently captures a closed-door meetingRoet held with the local Jewish community in Innsbruck.

In the clip, the envoy can be heard dismissing reports of civilian casualties in the Palestinian enclave,stating “if you’re believing that Israel is targeting babies intentionally, [this] is not correct.”

He then notesthat “there are no uninvolved in Gaza.” “There should be a death sentence to be killed off… In war, if you hold a gun, even if you are a 16-year-old… [or] a child, a 17-year-old, [who] holds a grenade,” he adds.

Roet then warns thatshould the EU be “crazy enough” to invest in rebuilding Gaza, Israel would have to “destroy” it once again.

In a statement circulated on social media, the activist who recorded the meeting and whose name is unknown condemned the ambassador’s remarks, stating:“I felt sickened by the calm in Mr. Roet’s voice as he made these statements. No one intervened when he suggested the death penalty for children.”

He also suggested that “this makes me think how corrupted the issue iswhen people with the power to change something suggest committing war crimes as a solution.”

Roet has yet to comment on the recording.

The incident comes amid escalating violence in Gaza as a ceasefire, which was declared in January and led, among other things, to the release of a number of Israeli hostages and Palestinian prisoners, expired earlier this month. On Tuesday, Israel resumed airstrikes in the enclave after accusing Hamas of sabotaging the deal.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office stated that the strikes are a response to “Hamas’s repeated refusal to release our hostages, as well as its rejection of all of the proposals” it has received from the US and other mediators. “Israel will, from now on, act against Hamas with increasing military strength,” the statement read.

Israel’s campaign against Hamas in response to the October 7 attack has led to unprecedented destruction in Gaza. According to the enclave’s Health Ministry, at least 50,000 Palestinians have been killed since the start of the hostilities, while Israeli officials estimate the country’s losses at more than 1,700. Additionally, the UN estimates that over 13,000 children have been killed in Gaza, with thousands more injured.

https://www.rt.com/news/614700-israeli-diplomat-execute-children-gaza/

>>22813630 Judge Boasberg refuses to testify in congressional hearing, claiming executive privilegePN

How does Boasberg have Executive Privilege? Is he stealing the EP from the President? Is he now making up laws or rules.

One thing is for sure this guy is desperate, and Roberts is more desperate

24 Mar, 2025 13:25

‘Nazis’ in Ukraine ‘nurtured’ by Europeans – Lavrov

The West is deliberately overlooking Kiev’s transgressions and using Ukraine as a tool against Russia, the foreign minister has claimed

European NATO members are willfully ignoring the “Nazi” character of the Ukrainian government, which they have empowered as an anti-Russian instrument, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has asserted.

On Monday, the senior diplomat expressed concern over the “demons of neo-Nazism, Russophobia, and other hateful ideologies”spreading across multiple EU nations.Member states are deliberately overlooking Kiev’s misconduct, even as it persecutes ethnic Russians and violates human rights, he stressed.

“Ukraine – ‘that’s different.’ Those Nazis have been nurtured for the latest attempt to unite all of Europe under racist, Nazi banners for a war against the Russian Federation,” Lavrov stated.

The minister was speaking in his capacity as a trustee of the Gorchakov Fund, a Russian NGO aimed at enhancing public diplomacy. He emphasized the organization’s mission of presenting an authentic view of Russia and contrasted it sharply with the West’s approach topublic messaging that “portrays itself as infallible and suffers from an exceptionalism complex.”

The EU is pursuing a multibillion-dollar rearmament plan, justified by what Brussels labels a growing Russian threat. European officials have warned that a direct NATO confrontation with Moscow may break out within the next few years. Russia, however, denies any hostile intentions toward the US-led military bloc.

Tensions between European NATO members and Washington resurfaced after President Donald Trump assumed office in January. The new US administration has sought a swift resolution to the Ukraine conflict and intends to shift security responsibilities onto Europe once a truce is achieved.

Moscow’s goal of ‘denazification’ remains central to its stance on the Ukraine conflict. Russian officials have denounced the Ukrainian government as a “neo-Nazi regime” due to its discriminatory domestic policies, alleged war crimes against Russian citizens, and veneration of historical nationalist figures who collaborated with Nazi Germany during World War II.

https://www.rt.com/russia/614704-lavrov-nazis-ukraine-eu/

24 Mar, 2025 13:37

US and Russia engaging in ‘creative’ talks – Moscow

A possible revival of the Black Sea Initiative is being discussed in Saudi Arabia

The US-Russian talks held in Saudi Arabia are a “creative” endeavor, though they may not yield a diplomatic breakthrough on Monday, a Russian lawmaker who is part of Moscow’s delegation told journalists.

Grigory Karasin, chairman of the International Relations Committee in Russia’s upper chamber of parliament, provided the media an update during a break in the talks in Riyadh. The discussions, which he described as “technical,”focus on maritime security in the Black Sea and the possibility of reviving the Black Sea Initiative, which was originally mediated by the UN and Türkiye.Russia withdrew from the deal in July 2023, citing the West’s failure to provide sanctions relief for its grain exports, as the conditions of the arrangement required.

“Not every negotiation yields a high-profile document or agreement,” Karasin remarked before returning to the closed-door meetings.“What matters is maintaining communication and understanding each other’s positions. In this regard, we are succeeding.”

Alongside Karasin, Russia’s delegation includes Sergey Beseda, an adviser to the director of the Federal Security Service. Their American counterparts, as identified by Reuters,are Andrew Peek, a senior director at the White House National Security Council, andMichael Anton, a senior State Department official.

When asked about possible outcomes, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov remarked earlier in the day that they “primarily concern the safety of maritime traffic. However, if you recall [the original version] of the deal,there were significant obligations made to our side that were never fulfilled. This remains part of the agenda.”

US President Donald Trump has suggested revisiting the grain deal as part of his efforts to mediate a broader truce between Russia and Ukraine, Peskov added.

Russian President Vladimir Putin agreed to Trump’s proposal to suspend attacks on Ukrainian energy infrastructure, while Ukraine committed to reciprocate. However, Kiev has violated the partial ceasefire multiple times, including on Monday morning, according to Russia. Moscow has warned that it reserves the right to withdraw from the arrangement should Ukraine fail to meet its commitments.

A Ukrainian delegation is also present at the same luxury hotel in Riyadh where the US-Russian talks are taking place, but they have no direct contact with the Russian team. The Ukrainians had their own talks with the US delegation the previous day.

(I love these articles, they piss off the EU terribly! And Michael Antony is there!)

https://www.rt.com/russia/614705-black-sea-talks-riyadh/

24 Mar, 2025 11:37

Kiev attacks internationally-operated oil pipeline in Russia – Moscow

A drone intercepted overnight was aimed at key infrastructure co-owned by US investors, the Defense Ministry has said

An armed Ukrainian drone was shot down overnight near an oil pumping station in Russia operated by an international company, the Russian Defense Ministry has said

The interception reportedly occurred early Monday around 7km from the Kropotkinskaya facility,which is part of the energy link managed by the Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC).The ministry stated that the station was the intended target of the drone, citing a prior attack against it in mid-February.

The CPC includes major US oil companies such as Chevron and ExxonMobil among its stakeholdersand primarily facilitates the export of Kazakh oil through Russian territory.

Moscow characterized the incident as yet another violation of a US-mediated partial ceasefire, under which both Moscow and Kiev committed to refraining from strikes on energy infrastructure.

The agreement aims to pave the way for a broader truce, with indirect negotiations taking place this week in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The discussions will also focus on maritime security in the Black Sea.The US is serving as a shuttle, with no direct discussions between Russia and Ukraine planned.

”The Kiev regime continues to plan, prepare, and execute attacks against energy infrastructure, including internationally-owned assets within Russia,” the ministry said.

Last week, the Russian military accused Kiev of conducting a kamikaze drone strike against an oil transfer station in Krasnodar Region, which services the CPC-operated pipeline. The incident occurred hours after Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart, Donald Trump, approved the partial ceasefire. By the time the assault unfolded, Ukraine’s Vladimir Zelensky publicly endorsed the agreement.

Days later, Moscow reported that Ukrainian forces had demolished a border gas metering station in Kursk Region, with Kiev attributing the explosion to Russian actions. According to the Russian military, Ukrainian troops blew up the facility during their retreat after a months-long incursion.

Despite what the DefenseMinistry labeled a “provocation,” it stated that it intends to maintain the partial ceasefire. The Foreign Ministry later warned, however, that Russia could withdraw from the deal if Kiev continues its violations.

https://www.rt.com/russia/614693-ukraine-drone-oil-pipeline/

It’s clearly apparent that Kiev doesn’t want peace, the make too much money to let the war end.

24 Mar, 2025 14:57

Russia honoring energy strike truce despite Ukraine’s violations – Kremlin

Vladimir Putin has not issued new orders regarding the 30-day partial ceasefire with Kiev, spokesman Dmitry Peskov says

Russia will continue to uphold the moratorium on strikes against Ukrainian energy infrastructure,despite Kiev’s numerous violations, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov has said.

Speaking to reporters on Monday, Peskov stated that Moscow is still abiding by the partial ceasefire deal, despite Ukraine’s strikes on Russian energy facilities.

“There have been no new commands from [Russian President Vladimir Putin]. Our armed forces are following all instructions from the commander-in-chief,”he said.

The suspension of strikes was agreed to following a phone call last week between Putin and his US counterpart, Donald Trump, during which the two discussed a potential 30-day ceasefire in the Ukraine conflict.

While Russia did not agree to a full truce, citing the need for a monitoring mechanism and for Kiev to cease its rearmament and mobilization, Putin approved a month-long pause on strikes against energy facilities. Ukraine also signed on to the agreement.

Moscow, however, accused Kiev of violating the deal almost immediately. Russian officials said Ukrainian forces destroyed a gas metering station while retreating from the town of Sudzha in Kursk Region and struck an oil depot in Russia’s Krasnodar Region. Additionally, on Monday night, an armed Ukrainian drone was shot down near an oil pumping station in the same area. The targeted facility is managed by the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, which is co-owned by American investors.

Addressing the incidents, Peskov stated: “We are monitoring the situation very closely. Our American counterparts also have the opportunity to observe and draw appropriate conclusions.”

On Saturday, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova warned that if “the Kiev regime continues this destructive course,” Russia “reserves the right to retaliate, including symmetrically.”

https://www.rt.com/russia/614709-peskov-moratorium-strikes-ukraine/

The Supreme Court Must Recognize That The Executive’s Great Powers Also Mean Smaller Powers 1/2

Western law is derived in large measure from Jewish legal principles. The rabbis expound on Rabbi Yishmael’s 13 Principles (Middot) of interpretation, even expanding to some by Rabbi Akiva. Perhaps the most important of all is kal vachomer, “light and heavy.”

This principle says that if something is forbidden in a minor situation, it is also forbidden in a more weighty (important, stringent, etc.) situation. The reverse also applies. If something is not allowed in a prominent situation, it isn’t allowed in the minor one either. Finally, this rule also applies to what isallowed. These principles matter a great deal when considering the efforts leftist judges are making to prevent President Trump from carrying out his election mandate to govern under the Constitution.

Americans are intuitively aware of Trump’s mandate to govern.As James Woods puts it, “How do Republicans hold all the power yet can’t bring criminals to justice, but Democrats push all these hoaxes through and hold hearings nonstop? Is there one single Republican with balls besides Trump? Just one?”

The injustice of this situation is part of why we elected Donald Trump. It’s also why we cheer when an FBI agent who tried to take Trump down during his first term is arrested at JFK airport trying to flee the country after leaking classified information. We shouted for Hillary Clinton to be arrested for national security violations with her unsecured server and for James Comey to be taken down for his blatant leaking. This list of gross injustices is, to quote Goose, “long and distinguished.”

Yes, we’re starting to see formerly “privileged” individuals called to account for their previously protected criminal activity. But that isn’t the big issue. Donald Trump (Surprise, surprise!) is at the center, both in what he’s doing, what the courts are doing to stop him, and what American legal principles and kal vachomer say that Trump should be able to do. This essay will walk you through it.

In my recent AT post, I covered a list of cases that acknowledge that current Supreme Court precedent creates some restrictions on who and how the President can fire. In addition to those cases, some others you can review are Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935), as modified by Seila Law v. CFPB (2020), and Bessent v. Dellinger (2025, DC Court of Appeals).

The upshot of these Supreme Court-created firing restrictions is that America has a permanent, protected class of bureaucrats. In practical fact, they are not answerable to anyone, and this is the root of our public distaste for government. Government is supposed to serve us, but instead, it serves itself.

7_74_19.gif

The Federal Mediation and Conciliation Servicestands as a sentinel example near K Street. While fewer than a hundred officially occupy offices in its luxurious nine-story office building, it has little real oversight and great personal privileges. Similar sinecures exist all through the government.

As DOGE discovers each new nest of feral feds, that information is handed to Trump’s department heads, and these heads then terminate those feral feds’ paychecks and privileges. Almost immediately, however, some federal court judge then issues an order demanding that Trump give the candy back to the babies. In most cases, the reasons come from one of two “legal authorities.”

The first legal authority arises in the case of USAID and other similar agencies. There, the Court will say that the employees are protected by the Civil Service Act (“CSA”), and Trump didn’t jump through the hoops that it and the Administrative Procedures Act require. That means that he violated the law. And technically, if we’re talking about the CSA, he probably did violate the law’s terms. It has a maze of protections that make it almost impossible to terminate a federal employee.

But pointing to the CSA is looking in the wrong direction.The Constitution is the highest law in the land, and the CSA directly contradicts Article II, § 1, which gives all executive branch power to Donald Trump. No exceptions.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/03/the_supreme_court_must_recognize_that_the_executive_s_great_powers_also_mean_smaller_powers.html

>>22813869

2/2

The President is required to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed” (Art II, § 3). Since the CSA is a “law,” it would seem that he is required to follow the CSA.But that would see him violate the vesting clause, which is a higher law. So, either the President is required to break the CSA to follow the Constitution to get rid of employees that are supernumerary or acting contrary to the President’s direction, or he has to break his oath to the Constitution.

That’s an interesting issue but it doesn’t touch upon the kal vachomer principle. That shows up when we get to the second line of cases involving Trump’s firing agency directorsfor the Federal Trade Commission, Office of Government Ethics, and Merit Systems Protection Board. The president has the sole constitutional authority to nominate these people, with the Senate then confirming them under its power to “advise and consent” (Art II, § 2, Cl 2). At present, the claim is that these directors are protected from being fired without specified notice and cause, under a line of cases following Humphrey’s Executor. But, as noted in my prior post, that case is ready to be overturned since it conflicts with Article II, § 1.

Our key case, which is still the core of all cases around the President’s power to fire, is Myers v. United States (1926), which clarified that the President has the freedom to fire any official he nominated and the Senate confirmed. In short, it says that the President’s power to appoint also includes the unfettered power to remove.

The only excuse in the other cases for tying the president’s hands is that the agencies were somehow “independent.” But this stands even further from the Constitution in that this idea creates an unaccountable fourth branch of government. As Star-Kist used to say, “Sorry, Charlie.” There are only three branches, and this is a key reason that the current justices seem poised to overturn Humphrey’s Executor. But what does this have to do with Jewish legal principles?

It’s easy to point out Article II, § 1. But the real principle has to do with Myers. This case established that the President can terminate at will the service of the highest level officers in his Cabinet. Lower-level firings logically fall under the principle of kal vachomer: If the President has the power to remove the highest and most important officers, that “heavy” task necessarily includes the “lighter” task of removing officers in the so-called “independent agencies.” Thus, if there is no legal reason to prevent the President from removing Cabinet level officers he appointed, there is similarly no legal reason to prevent him from removing any officer he has appointed.

Let’s follow this rabbit trail. If the President has the power under the principle of kal vachomer to remove all the officials he appoints, then he also has the power to remove anyone who works for those higher-level officials. In short, he has plenary hiring and firing authority throughout the Executive branch. But isn’t that what Article II, § 1 says? After all, we already know that because the Constitution also makes him the Commander in Chief (Article II, § 2) of the armed forces, Trump can drum out every transgender with a stroke of his pen, and no one has the right to question him—not even Judge Ana Reyes.

Ultimately the Supreme Court is going to have to return to Constitutional order.

It does not matter that some lefty lawyer complains. Donald Trump can fire the entire Executive branch in one fell swoop if he chooses.Of course, that might leave him with no one to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.” At the same time, this ridiculous example makes it clear that resistance is futile.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/03/the_supreme_court_must_recognize_that_the_executive_s_great_powers_also_mean_smaller_powers.html

Ted Noel is a retired physician who posts on social media as Doctor Ted.

March 24, 2025

The Trump Administration Goes to War against Bureaucratic Tyranny1/2By J.B. Shurk

“This town is now as nervous as it’s ever been.” That’s Congressman Chip Roy’s assessment of the mood in Washington, D.C., since President Trump’s return to the White House. It’s one of several dozen refreshingly blunt descriptions of American politics in Ned Ryun’s new documentary based on his book,American Leviathan. Thedocumentary is available to anyone with an Internet connection, and it is nothing short of a declaration of war on the administrative state.

I highlighted Ryun’s book when it came out last September for several reasons. First, it is aremarkably clear descriptionof the ideas, people, and events that led us to this unique moment in history— when theinevitable clash between the authoritarian bureaucracy and the constitutional Republic has come to a head. There was nothing “natural” about this process.

The vast and unaccountable administrative statedid not arise from the U.S. Constitution; it is a repudiation of the Constitution. The unelected bureaucracy does not reflect the wishes of the American people;it is the polar opposite of representative government. No matter how many propagandists defend Big Government as “our Democracy,” the ever-growing Leviathan is thoroughly authoritarian in disposition.It jealously guards its expanding powers and despises American citizens who insist that legitimate governmentcomes only from the consent of the people.

It is such an unnatural beast that it must spy on Americans, censor their speech, and intimidate them into submission merely to maintain control. The administrative state is “government by coercion” and the antithesis of limited government and individual liberty.

Second, Ryun is a rather unique political operativein that he “walks the walk” every bit as much as he “talks the talk” He is an effective warrior when it comes to getting Republicans elected, but he is also a tireless critic of the Deep State. Those qualities are often mutually exclusive in high-stakes American politics where a person’s clout is usually directly proportional to his willingness to sell out personal principles.

Washington’s political machine— the Frankensteinian monstrosity composed of equal parts malevolent bureaucracy, corporate blackmail, academic blacklisting, news media gatekeeping, Intelligence Community skulduggery, and rank influence peddling —tends to scoop up “true believers” and recondition them into compliant cogsof the permanent government’s hive-mind, collectivist “Borg.” Ryun is a rare political player who refuses to be “assimilated” or transformed into another D.C. “drone.”

Lastly,I wanted readers to mentally prepare for what would happen after President Trump won in November. There were fifty days between the publication of Ryun’s American Leviathan and Trump’s victory, and while those crucial days required all of our efforts to make sure that he would, in fact, be re-elected, I knew that we would have no time to waste once he succeeded.That’s where Ryun’s efforts really stand out. His book is meant (1) to wake up those who have been sleeping during the century-long transformation of the American Republic into a tyrannical bureaucracy, (2) to re-energize those who have been fighting the good fight for most of their lives, and (3) to lay out the blueprint for restoring the Republic and destroying the Deep State. I wanted readers to spend time before the election thinking about what would come next because winning was only “Step One” of a much larger operation.

Something that should be clear six months after American Leviathan came out in print is thatPresident Trump and his closest advisors have long been preparing for this war against the administrative state. They weren’t just running a political campaign the last few years;they’ve been planning their return to Washington, D.C., in meticulous detail. From the moment the news media cartel was forced to announce Trump’s victory, those plans became active operations. Critical personnel choices were announced. Executive orders were finalized. Litigation strategies were put into motion.

It is no coincidencethat many of Ryun’s recommendations for “slaying Leviathan”are now official White House policy. The Trump administration embraces American Leviathan’s proposition that the only way to save the Republic is to disembowel the unelected, unaccountable bureaucracy.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/03/the_trump_administration_goes_to_war_against_bureaucratic_tyranny.

>>22813988

2/2

While Ryun’s book is an excellent resource for American minds desperate to break free from a century of bureaucratic hypnosis and Deep State conditioning,his documentary provides a kind of real time snapshot of the Trump administration’s ongoing “Leviathan hunt” today. Among many interesting contributors to the film, Congressman Roy and Senators Jim Banks, Rick Scott, and Marsha Blackburn offer insightful perspectives regarding Trump’s impact on Establishment Washington, and Jeff Clark, Mike Davis, Steve Cortes, Bradley Watson, and Rachel Bovard provide excellent analysis of the many conflicts playing out publicly today. Every speaker is strikingly candid about where all this is heading —a showdown between two incompatible systems of government from which only one may survive.

Senator Banks says plainly that the Deep State’s animus toward President Trump originates with the “three most dangerous words” he uttered during the 2016 campaign:“Drain the Swamp.”As soon as then-candidate Trump identified the administrative state as not only an affront to the U.S. Constitution but also a threat to the American Republic, he became public enemy number one for the bureaucratic “blob.” The Russia collusion hoax, the Mueller Inquisition, the farcical impeachments, the endless lawfare, and the ridiculous investigatorywitch-hunts all arose because Donald Trump directly attacked institutionsthat have governed almost absolutely for over a century while avoiding serious public scrutiny.

In front of huge crowds, Trump called out agencies and bureaucrats by name and promised to rein in their out-of-control harassment of the American people.=The administrative state, having long exercised the constitutionally delegated powers of the Executive Branch while thumbing its nose at the elected president,correctly worried that Trump would reclaim legitimate Executive authorities that it had illegitimately usurped decades ago.

For a hundred years, America’s permanent ruling class has operated a state within a state in which the president is treated mostly as a figurehead and recognized as “chief executive” in name only. In this absurd “Bizarro World” where low-level bureaucrats are quasi-kings and the three branches of government retain meager residual powers,the Constitution is a document that just gets in the Deep State’s way.

In Ryun’s documentary, Congressman Roy pulls no punches against the administrative state while laying well-deserved blame at the feet of lawmakers. In lauding Elon Musk’s work to expose and eliminate government waste, fraud, and abuse,Roy says the American people have to hold Congress accountable. “Because you’ve been searching for the enemy, andthe enemy is right in front of you. It is us. It is Congress. We’re the ones that continue to fund the very things” that enable the Deep State.

“We’re begging you to save us because we’re that bad.”That’s a rather direct plea from a sitting congressman for the American people to rise up and demand an end to America’s unconstitutional bureaucracy. In calling for the “slashing and burning” of Leviathan, Roy argues that DOGE shouldn’t stand for the Department of Government Efficiency but ratherthe Department of Government Elimination. That’s a theme throughout Ryun’s documentary.

Another theme is that Americans can win this war against the administrative state. Rachel Bovard acknowledges how difficult it is for any country that has gone so far down the path of bureaucratic tyranny to survive. But then she notes, “Every day this country does something that no-one has ever seen before in the history of the world.If there is anyone who can shake off the shackles of bureaucratic statism, it’s us. It’s America.”

As Ryun says at the end of both his book and documentary,the solution is simple: “Break the State. Drain the Swamp. Restore the Republic.” In a hundred years, there has never been a better time.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2025/03/the_trump_administration_goes_to_war_against_bureaucratic_tyranny.html

Bannon: “The Process Itself Will Send A Signal To This Radical Judiciary, You’re Not Untouchable.”

14:55

https://rumble.com/embed/v6ox2pq/?pub=4

>>22814007

This is really fascinating and must listen! How Trump worked with Weiss negotiated to not destroy his law firm.

>>22814007

The house is trying to pivot away from impeaching Judge Boasberg, trying to pass a law to prevent the country injunctions. Thats it

>>22814007

Paul Weiss folded big time with Trump to keep his law firm

“You’re The Oligarch’s Bitches.” Steve Bannon On Trump Cutting Off Elites From Government Contractsit’s a huge deal that Trump made the Weiss law firm to fold. They were going to hang together and Weiss didn’t. This is great!

11:15

https://rumble.com/embed/v6ox2vc/?pub=4

“Recolonize American Culture.” Roger Kimball On President Trump Standing Up To Credentialed ClassDiscussing an Article by a person that thinks they are the Elites, and “only we can make changes” in the country. And only we can get money

9:28

https://rumble.com/embed/v6ox3li/?pub=4

“I Saw A Graphic Of Trump With A Swastika Over His Face.” Kari Lake On Voice Of America Scale DownNo agency ever scales back, it’s just more money.

9:33

https://rumble.com/embed/v6ox4bm/?pub=4

Bannon: “Everything Has To Be In The Framework Of What’s In The Best Interest Of Our Citizens.”

13:48

https://rumble.com/embed/v6ox6bk/?pub=4