Anonymous ID: 4a1703 March 24, 2025, 3:05 p.m. No.22815492   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

โ€œAt this time, the message thread that was reported appears to be authentic, and we are reviewing how an inadvertent number was added to the chain,โ€ Hughes wrote. โ€œThe thread is a demonstration of the deep and thoughtful policy coordination between senior officials.

 

โ€œThe ongoing success of the Houthi operation demonstrates that there were no threats to our servicemembers or our national security.โ€

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/white-house-responds-after-journalist-apparently-looped-into-discussions-on-yemen-strike-5830522?utm_source=gab&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=etgab

Anonymous ID: 4a1703 March 24, 2025, 3:20 p.m. No.22815560   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5568 >>5583

sedwards33123

@sedwards33123

 

16m

ยท

ยท

/g/The_Donald

https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2025/0318/104-10100-10394.pdf

 

Here's a seemingly run-of-the-mill document which has nothing to do with JFK or the other assassinations. Remember what I said about keywords.

 

There's a pattern:

 

There needs to be not one, but TWO keyword matches. The keyword could be the date (dates around 22 November 1963 are added frequently) but they can be names.

 

Look closely.

 

At the bottom, the document is signed J.C. King. King is one of the keywords for obvious reasons, but what's the second keyword? The answer is "J.C."

 

Someone at NARA in 1992 was using J.C. and Hardin as separate search keywords and set forth a requirement in their algo that two keywords be present to flag a document.

 

I've yet to find a document mentioning "J.C. Hardin" in its entirety, but someone at NARA was clearly looking for the name. I am only about 10% of the way through the documents, however.

 

If anyone wants to collaborate on this, please, for the love of God, let me know.

 

https://gab.com/sedwards33123/posts/114219658578041729