>>2281224 (old)
Comparing Claire Bronfman's alleged crimes to Michael Milken's sort of arbitrarily invented crimes (the lines he crossed were defined after he crossed them, and it was just outsized greed, nothing perverted) is very unfair to Milken.
I believe Bronfman made bail because the cash amount was set at 1% of the bond, rather than the typical 10%. Why did she get such a price break – is it normal for big-ticket bail bonds?
"There is only Q." Well R does exist and posts here, whatever or whoever R is, but if there's only Q, it implies that R=Q.
B8028 could be a Boeing manufacturing number. The tail numbers are N.
I'd argue there's no room for "unknown" here, that the proof is logically correct, regardless of what we may not know.
It rests on the idea that "you don't know what you don't know", which I think of as the basis of the effect.
Are you saying Q may think R is a subset of Q (logically implied by "there is only Q"), but then Q is wrong?
In the audio, it clearly sounds like Trump says "don't pay her cash" so, um yeah Trump does say "cash" but it's the opposite of what they are implying.
Cohen says "no no no" in agreeable tone, not alarmed, but like "no of course I wouldn't give her cash".