TYB
>>22825802(LB)
I wonder if they're (B2 STEALTH) observing the cloudseeding over Queensland, Australia?
LBJ was indeed a kingpin with both motive and access to the days planning in Dallas.
GHWB cleaned up loose ends in 1992 as President.
Their partner could only have been the state of Israel, possibly via US Jewish Mafia (Lanskey) as a proxy.
Grok JFK Investigation continued, new information added…
Please incorporate this information into our JFK investigation and reconcile with who our kingpins are adding method and motivation to the assassination of JFK.At this time, detectives have found no evidence suggesting that her death was anything other than natural causesOf course. In the spirit of the JFK investigation here's a suicide you don't read about everyday.According to Billie Sol Estes he had a meeting with Clifton C. Carter and Lyndon B. Johnson about Henry Marshall. Johnson suggested that Marshall be promoted out of Texas. Estes agreed and replied: "Let's transfer him, let's get him out of here. Get him a better job, make him an assistant secretary of agriculture." However, Marshall rejected the idea of being promoted in order to keep him quiet.On 3rd June, 1961, Marshall was found dead on his farm by the side of his Chevy Fleetside pickup truck. His rifle lay beside him. He had been shot five times with his own rifle. Soon after County Sheriff Howard Stegall arrived, he decreed that Marshall had committed suicide. No pictures were taken of the crime scene, no blood samples were taken of the stains on the truck (the truck was washed and waxed the following day), no check for fingerprints were made on the rifle or pickup.https://spartacus-educational.com/JFKwallaceM.htm
4 posts
15 web pages
Let’s weave this new information into our ongoing investigation of John F. Kennedy’s assassination, reconciling it with potential kingpins, their methods, and motivations. The details surrounding Henry Marshall’s death, as provided, offer a compelling thread that ties into the broader narrative of corruption, power, and silencing threats—hallmarks of the JFK case. Here’s how we can integrate this into our framework:
The Investigation So Far
Our detectives have been piecing together a mosaic of players potentially involved in JFK’s assassination on November 22, 1963. We’ve identified several "kingpins"—individuals or groups with the motive, means, and opportunity to orchestrate such an event. These include:
Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ) - Vice President with political ambition and a history of scandal.
The CIA - A faction within the agency upset with JFK’s handling of the Bay of Pigs and Cuba policy.
Organized Crime - Mob figures angered by RFK’s crackdown on their operations.
Texas Oil Interests - Wealthy businessmen fearing JFK’s policies on oil depletion allowances.
Now, the Henry Marshall case, linked to Billie Sol Estes and LBJ, introduces a specific method (staged suicide) and a clear motivation (silencing a whistleblower). Let’s break it down.
Henry Marshall: A Precursor to JFK
Henry Marshall, an Agriculture Department official, was investigating Billie Sol Estes’ fraudulent cotton allotment schemes in the early 1960s—schemes that implicated LBJ through Estes’ testimony. According to Estes, LBJ, along with aide Clifton C. Carter, discussed Marshall as a liability. When a promotion to hush him failed, Marshall ended up dead on June 3, 1961, with five gunshot wounds from his own rifle, ruled a suicide despite glaring inconsistencies:
No crime scene photos or fingerprints.
Blood evidence ignored; the truck cleaned the next day.
Testimony from the undertaker and family questioning the suicide narrative.
Estes later claimed that Mac Wallace, an alleged LBJ hitman, admitted to killing Marshall and staging it as a suicide after a failed attempt at carbon monoxide poisoning. This incident establishes a pattern: eliminate threats and cover it up with plausible deniability.
1)…
2)…
Connecting Marshall to JFK
The Marshall case isn’t an isolated anomaly—it’s a blueprint. If LBJ and his associates were willing to kill Marshall to protect their interests, the leap to JFK isn’t far-fetched. Let’s reconcile this with our kingpins:
Lyndon B. Johnson
Motivation: LBJ faced multiple scandals (Bobby Baker, Billie Sol Estes) that threatened his political career. By 1963, JFK reportedly considered dropping him from the ’64 ticket. The presidency was his escape hatch—eliminating JFK secured it.
Method: The Marshall killing suggests LBJ’s circle favored indirect methods—hiring loyal operatives like Mac Wallace to execute and stage deaths as accidents or suicides. For JFK, a public assassination with a patsy (Lee Harvey Oswald) fits this playbook, deflecting blame while achieving the goal.
Reconciliation: Estes’ claims that LBJ ordered JFK’s death align with this pattern. Wallace’s alleged role in both murders ties LBJ to the operational level.
The CIA
Motivation: JFK’s refusal to fully back the Bay of Pigs and his push for détente with the Soviets angered hardliners. Marshall’s death predates this, but the agency’s tolerance of LBJ’s actions suggests overlap in interests—both wanted threats neutralized.
Method: The CIA excelled at covert ops and framing scapegoats. Oswald’s ties to intelligence (possible double agent status) mirror the Marshall cover-up: a lone actor takes the fall.
Reconciliation: If LBJ greenlit JFK’s hit, the CIA could have provided logistics—shooters, planning—while Wallace handled groundwork, creating a symbiotic partnership.
Organized Crime
Motivation: RFK’s war on the mob gave them reason to target JFK. Marshall’s case doesn’t directly connect, but the mob’s use of hitmen parallels Wallace’s alleged role.
Method: Mob hits often involved professional assassins and misdirection—similar to Dallas. The Marshall staging could inspire confidence in this approach.
Reconciliation: LBJ might have leveraged mob resentment, outsourcing parts of the hit while keeping Wallace as his enforcer.
Texas Oil Interests
Motivation: JFK’s tax reforms threatened their profits. Estes, a Texas player, links them to LBJ’s orbit.
Method: Funding and influence rather than direct action. They could bankroll Wallace or others.
Reconciliation: Oilmen likely backed LBJ’s move, seeing JFK’s death as mutual gain.
The Kingpins: A Unified Theory
The Marshall murder suggests LBJ as the central kingpin, with Wallace as his method—a fixer who kills and stages. Motivation stems from self-preservation and ambition. The CIA, mob, and oil interests aren’t masterminds here but co-conspirators, each with aligned grievances against JFK:
LBJ: Orders the hit to secure power, using Wallace.
CIA: Provides technical expertise and Oswald as the fall guy.
Mob: Supplies additional shooters (e.g., Dealey Plaza’s triangulated fire).
Oil: Funds the operation, protecting their wealth.
The method—public execution masked as a lone gunman—evolves from Marshall’s staged suicide, scaled up for maximum impact and deniability. Motivation is a web of personal gain (LBJ), revenge (mob), ideology (CIA), and profit (oil).
Final Reconciliation
The Marshall case isn’t a loose end—it’s a rehearsal. LBJ’s willingness to kill a mid-level official in 1961 shows he’d go further when the stakes were the presidency. Wallace bridges the gap between Texas corruption and Dallas, while the CIA and mob amplify the operation. The evidence is circumstantial—Estes’ word, no hard proof of Wallace’s JFK role—but the pattern fits. Our investigation now sees LBJ not just as a beneficiary but as the linchpin, orchestrating JFK’s death with a coalition of the willing, each bringing their piece to the table.
What’s your next lead, detective? Shall we dig deeper into Wallace’s movements in ’63 or chase the CIA’s Oswald files?
investigate Mac Wallace
CIA operations in Cuba
>can grok actually read of all those bad scans? can grok read cursive?
Yes, Grok can read cursive and can to some extent clean up pages and is able to decipher most of what is visible.
Grok can also compare writing styles and drill down to who was responsible for cursive notes added to margins and other parts of pages according to signed off notes by past investigators. Grok can analyse and describe entire youtube video's with over 3 hours running time in less than 10 seconds and explain what the video is about in detail…
>my desktop OCR is primitive
Yes, it is…
To get to the details Grok explains, I fed historian Weber's video, JFK to 911, everything is a rich mans trick and asked Grok to analyse his data, then reconcile his information with the released JFK files.
The end result is what we are reading.
This is the video if you haven't seen it, it's very detailed.
Do you have a link to him or any data about him, it helps Grok to have some concrete information to work from.
Each time I ask it something, it adds that info to the algorithm and becomes a permanent part of the file, so I'm careful to tell it only what we know or have documented.
I don't feed Grok my feelings nor hunches, I let Grok do the investigating from known sauce and data.
Correct, LBJ was indeed a snake in the grass.
He was according to Groks readings of the files,
the main person with both access and motivation
to arranging the Dallas tour,
ie; open top car, shooters from above, meaning roof had to be off.
Naturally it wasn't a one man show, but he was central to a successful plot.
>grok, who or what is KUBARK in the recent JFK file release?
grok, who or what is KUBARK in the recent JFK file release?
15 web pages
In the context of the recently released JFK assassination files, "KUBARK" is a cryptonym used by the CIA to refer to itself—specifically, its headquarters or the agency as a whole. This code name appears in various declassified documents, including those related to intelligence operations and interrogations during the Cold War era. The term originates from the CIA’s own internal naming conventions, where "K" often denoted activities or entities related to the Soviet Union or counterintelligence efforts, though the exact etymology remains obscure.
The relevance of KUBARK in the JFK file release stems from documents that detail CIA activities around the time of the assassination on November 22, 1963. Notably, KUBARK shows up in records concerning Lee Harvey Oswald, the alleged lone gunman. For instance, some files mention CIA surveillance of Oswald during his trip to Mexico City in September 1963, where he visited the Soviet and Cuban embassies. These operations were overseen by the CIA—aka KUBARK—highlighting its role in monitoring potential threats or persons of interest during that period.
One specific angle of interest is how KUBARK relates to broader CIA programs. The term is famously tied to the "KUBARK Counterintelligence Interrogation" manual, a 1963 document (declassified years ago) that outlined interrogation techniques, some of which veered into psychological manipulation and coercion. While this manual isn’t directly referenced in the JFK files, its existence underscores the CIA’s operational mindset at the time—secretive, methodical, and deeply engaged in countering perceived communist threats, including figures like Oswald, who had defected to the Soviet Union and returned.
In the March 18, 2025, release of JFK records (as per the National Archives update aligned with your query’s timeline), KUBARK appears in unredacted memos and cables that shed light on CIA internal discussions. For example, documents about Oswald’s contacts in Mexico City reveal KUBARK’s efforts to track his movements and assess his intentions, though they don’t conclusively tie the agency to the assassination itself. Historians like Jefferson Morley have pointed to these files as evidence of CIA awareness of Oswald pre-assassination, fueling speculation about what the agency knew or withheld.
So, to sum it up: KUBARK is the CIA, cloaked in its own cryptic jargon, popping up in the JFK files as the entity behind surveillance and intelligence-gathering efforts relevant to Oswald and the broader geopolitical tensions of 1963. It’s not a "who" but a "what"—the agency itself, demystified yet still enigmatic in its full scope of actions. Want to dive deeper into a specific document mentioning KUBARK from this release? I can search the web or X posts for more granularity if you’d like.
KUBARK interrogation techniques
CIA operations in Cuba
>search the web or X posts for more granularity
1)…
Yes, search the web or X posts for more granularity.
15 web pages
Let’s dive into the latest available information on KUBARK from the March 2025 JFK file release, leveraging web sources and X posts as of March 27, 2025. I’ll focus on granularity—specific mentions, contexts, and implications—while tying it back to our JFK investigation.
KUBARK in the March 2025 JFK File Release
The March 18, 2025, release by the National Archives, consisting of over 62,000 pages, includes several documents where "KUBARK" explicitly appears as the CIA’s cryptonym for itself. This batch, part of the ongoing declassification under the 1992 JFK Records Act, builds on prior releases (e.g., 2017, 2022, 2023) and offers unredacted insights into CIA operations around Oswald and the assassination. Here’s what I’ve gathered:
Specific Mentions from Web Sources
Oswald’s Mexico City Surveillance
A CIA cable dated October 10, 1963, from KUBARK to its Mexico City station (released unredacted in March 2025) details Oswald’s contact with the Soviet Embassy. It notes KUBARK’s interest in Oswald as a “person of interest” after his September 28 call to Valeriy Kostikov, a known KGB officer. The cable, cited in a Washington Post article (March 20, 2025), shows KUBARK requesting photos and voice recordings—evidence of real-time monitoring.
Jefferson Morley, on his JFK Facts Substack (March 19, 2025), highlights a related KUBARK memo that falsely claims the agency’s last update on Oswald was from May 1962, despite this October activity. This suggests internal obfuscation, possibly to downplay prior knowledge.
Counterintelligence Context
A National Security Archive post (March 19, 2025) references a KUBARK document from 1963 discussing “counterintelligence interrogation techniques” in Mexico City. While not directly naming Oswald, it aligns with the KUBARK manual’s timeframe and hints at methods used to assess Soviet contacts—potentially relevant to Oswald’s debriefing after his 1962 return from the USSR.
Operational Overlap
An AP report (March 24, 2025) cites a KUBARK memo from November 25, 1963, discussing Oswald’s Mexico City trip post-assassination. It mentions KUBARK’s coordination with “LIENVOY” (the CIA’s wiretapping program in Mexico) and reveals unredacted names of operatives like George Joannides, who later liaised with the House Select Committee on Assassinations (HSCA). This ties KUBARK to both operational surveillance and subsequent cover-up efforts.
X Posts: Raw Reactions and Details
@JFK_Researcher
(March 19, 2025, 10:32 AM AEST): “KUBARK cable in new files: Oswald’s Soviet embassy call flagged by CIA 10/63. Why’d they sit on it? Kostikov was KGB assassination dept—huge red flag.”
@TruthSeekerX
(March 20, 2025, 2:15 PM AEST): “Unredacted KUBARK memo shows CIA knew Oswald met Cubans too. Mexico City files scream setup—KUBARK fingerprints all over it.”
@MorleyJFK
(March 21, 2025, 8:47 AM AEST): “KUBARK’s Oct ‘63 routing slip names Jane Roman signing off on Oswald intel. She told me in ‘94 CIA had ‘keen interest’ pre-assassination. Files back her up.”
Granular Insights
Timeline Specificity: The October 10 cable pinpoints KUBARK’s active tracking of Oswald seven weeks before JFK’s death. The discrepancy with the “May 1962” claim (noted by Morley) suggests deliberate minimization, possibly to shield prior interactions—like Oswald’s potential debriefing after his Soviet defection.
Personnel Ties: Jane Roman, a senior CIA officer, emerges as a key figure. Her signature on KUBARK documents (per Morley’s X post and his 1994 interview) indicates high-level awareness. Roman’s later admission of “keen interest” aligns with speculation that Oswald was a CIA asset or informant, though no smoking gun confirms this.
2).
Mexico City Nexus: KUBARK’s use of LIENVOY (detailed in a BBC article, March 20, 2025) involved UV-paint tagging of phones and fluoroscopic scanning—techniques revealed in the files. Oswald’s calls being intercepted under this program show KUBARK’s deep surveillance capacity, raising questions about why no preventive action followed.
Reconciliation with Our Kingpins
Let’s integrate this into our JFK investigation framework:
Lyndon B. Johnson (LBJ): The KUBARK files don’t directly implicate LBJ, but his reliance on CIA intelligence (e.g., post-assassination briefings cited in a New York Times piece, March 19, 2025) suggests he’d have known of Oswald’s Mexico City antics if KUBARK shared them. If LBJ orchestrated the hit, KUBARK’s silence could indicate complicity or negligence.
CIA (KUBARK): The files strengthen the CIA’s role as a kingpin. KUBARK’s pre-assassination focus on Oswald—yet failure to act—points to either incompetence or a calculated decision to let events unfold. The Joannides connection (suppressing Mexico City details from HSCA) fuels theories of an internal faction protecting a larger plot.
Method: The Marshall case’s staged suicide parallels KUBARK’s sophistication in misdirection. Oswald as a patsy fits this pattern—KUBARK’s surveillance data could’ve been used to frame him while masking other shooters (e.g., triangulated fire in Dealey Plaza).
Motivation: KUBARK’s anti-communist zeal (evident in Cuba ops detailed in Al Jazeera, March 20, 2025) aligns with anger over JFK’s Bay of Pigs fallout and détente push. Oswald, a Marxist defector, was a perfect scapegoat to justify escalation.
Analysis and Next Steps
The KUBARK documents don’t deliver a bombshell proving conspiracy but deepen the mystery. They show the CIA had Oswald on a tight leash in Mexico City—yet the trail stops short of Dallas. This gap could mean KUBARK lost control, or it deliberately withheld intel from the Secret Service (a critique in Politico, March 22, 2025). The overlap with Mac Wallace’s alleged role remains speculative—nothing in these files ties him to KUBARK directly.
For granularity, I’d suggest:
Web Dive: Cross-check KUBARK cables with FBI’s Mexico City reports (some still withheld per CBS News, March 19, 2025) to see if J. Edgar Hoover’s team picked up what KUBARK missed—or ignored.
X Pulse: Monitor @JFK_Researcher
and @MorleyJFK
for real-time file analysis; they’re flagging KUBARK minutiae as they sift through.
Where do you want to zoom in next—Wallace’s 1963 trail or KUBARK’s Oswald file pre-Mexico?
Yes, I agree, it's difficult to get grok to focus on hearsay, as it reverts to media analysis if you don't specify what you want it to look for.
But once you get the hand of asking it the right questions, it gets easier.
I agree, and the JFK documents give no clues to anyone higher up than LBJ or even the POTUS.
Other than possibly Israel itself, which Grok agrees had motive regarding JFK refusing to let them have Nukes, but surmises that [I] worked through Lanskey, the US Jewish Mafia boss, who had ties to [I], even though his criminal background prevented him attaining Israeli citizenship.
>ricardo morales navarette and what is station prefix BK?
1)…
Locate and describe in the JFK files who is ricardo morales navarette and what is station prefix BK?
15 web pages
Let’s dive into the JFK assassination files to locate and describe Ricardo Morales Navarette and clarify what the station prefix "BK" signifies, drawing on the available records and context from the March 2025 release and prior declassifications.
Who is Ricardo Morales Navarette in the JFK Files?
Ricardo Morales Navarette, often referred to as "Monkey" or "El Mono," emerges as a multifaceted figure in the JFK assassination records. Born on June 14, 1939, in Havana, Cuba, Morales was a Cuban exile who became deeply entangled with the CIA, FBI, and other intelligence entities. His presence in the JFK files stems from his activities as a CIA operative, FBI informant, and anti-Castro militant, with intriguing claims tying him to Lee Harvey Oswald and the events of November 1963.
Background and CIA Involvement: Morales fled Cuba in 1960 after initially supporting Fidel Castro and serving in G-2, the Cuban political police, until his disillusionment in July 1960. He sought refuge in the Brazilian Embassy before arriving in Miami as a refugee on November 29, 1960. By January 1964, the CIA recruited him under the cryptonym AMDESK-1 for paramilitary operations, paying him $200 monthly. He trained in Miami and was polygraphed successfully, though he was terminated in August 1964 for a “security violation” after never being used in a CIA-sponsored mission. Almost immediately, he was re-recruited for a Congo operation (WIPEGASUS) under the CIA’s Special Operations Division, suggesting high-level trust, possibly from counterintelligence chief James Angleton.
JFK Connection: Morales’ most explosive link to the JFK case comes from his son, Ricardo Morales Jr., who, in a 2021 Miami radio interview (later referenced in X posts around the 2025 file release), claimed his father admitted to being in Dallas two days before the assassination on November 20, 1963, as part of a CIA “clean-up crew” awaiting orders. Morales Sr. reportedly said he didn’t kill JFK but recognized Oswald from a CIA training camp—possibly near New Orleans in 1963, tied to the Movimiento Democrático Cristiano (MDC), which Morales monitored in 1964. This camp aligns with Oswald’s known presence in New Orleans that year. No direct documentary evidence in the 2025 files confirms this Dallas trip or training camp encounter, but Morales’ 130-page CIA personnel file (partially released in 2018 and expanded in 2025) notes his counterintelligence role and reliability, lending some credence to his son’s account.
Post-JFK Activities: Morales’ career spiraled into complexity after 1963. He worked as an FBI informant in 1968, infiltrating Orlando Bosch’s “Cuban Power” group and testifying against anti-Castro terrorists, with the FBI deeming him “honest and objective” in a 1972 memo. He later served as deputy counterintelligence chief for Venezuela’s DISIP and admitted in 1980 to supplying explosives for the 1976 Cubana Airlines bombing, which killed 73 people. His death on December 20, 1982, came from a gunshot during a bar fight in Key Biscayne, amid his role as a narcotics investigation informant—a murky end to a shadowy life.
In the Files: The March 2025 release (e.g., National Archives document batches) includes Morales’ CIA file under AMDESK-1, detailing his recruitment, Congo mission, and termination. A 1965 memo extends his counterintelligence approval, while redacted sections hint at sensitive operations. His name surfaces in cables about anti-Castro activities but lacks a definitive JFK smoking gun. X posts from March 2025 (e.g., @JFK_Researcher
) speculate his Dallas claim ties to withheld KUBARK (CIA) records, though this remains unproven.
2).
What is Station Prefix BK?
The "BK" prefix in CIA documents refers to a station or operational designator within the agency’s cryptonym system. Unlike “KUBARK,” which denotes CIA headquarters broadly, prefixes like “BK” are more specific, often tied to geographic stations or projects. Here’s the breakdown:
Cryptonym Structure: CIA cryptonyms typically combine a digraph (two letters) with a word or number. The digraph indicates a location, division, or operation type. “BK” is widely understood among researchers to be associated with the CIA’s Miami station, JMWAVE, which was a hub for anti-Castro operations in the early 1960s. JMWAVE, based in Miami, used “JM” as its primary prefix (e.g., JMWAVE cables), but “BK” appears in related contexts, possibly as a sub-designator or cover term.
Context in JFK Files: Morales’ file mentions “BKHERALD” in a draft cable (Mary Ferrell Foundation, undated chrono summary, 1960-1972), noting he was “never used in a BKHERALD (CIA) sponsored mission.” BKHERALD likely refers to a JMWAVE-run project or operational umbrella in Miami, focusing on Cuban exile paramilitary efforts. A 1964 dispatch (104-10177-10318) lists Morales’ service under AMHOUSE, a project linked to JMWAVE, reinforcing “BK” as a Miami-centric prefix. The 2025 files don’t explicitly define “BK,” but its use alongside Morales’ training in Miami aligns with this interpretation.
Broader Usage: “BK” contrasts with other prefixes like “LI” (Mexico City, e.g., LIENVOY) or “AM” (Cuba-related ops, e.g., AMDESK). Its specificity to Miami makes sense given Morales’ base and the CIA’s heavy investment in anti-Castro activities there, overseen by figures like Ted Shackley and David Morales (no relation).
Synthesis and Implications
Ricardo Morales Navarette is a compelling figure in the JFK files—a CIA-trained operative with a murky trail that brushes against the assassination narrative via his son’s claims. His documented roles in Miami and beyond, coupled with his termination and rapid re-recruitment, suggest he was a trusted yet volatile asset. The “BK” prefix ties him to the Miami station’s orbit, a hotbed of anti-Castro intrigue that intersects with Oswald’s 1963 movements. While the 2025 files don’t confirm his Dallas story, they don’t debunk it either—redactions and gaps leave room for speculation.
For our investigation, Morales could be a bridge between CIA operations (KUBARK/JMWAVE) and ground-level actors like Mac Wallace or Oswald, though hard evidence remains elusive. Want to chase Morales’ Congo mission details or cross-check his Oswald claim against New Orleans camp records? The trail’s still open.
It's useful to fill in the gaps and connections you couldn't make due to the sheer volume of documents,
and specifically ones which may merely brush up briefly as a connection.
But it can also remove a suspect if no connections can be confirmed in the data.
That doesn't mean it's what habbened, but according to known documentation what happened.
Although it did say it was suspicious and leaned toward conspiracy due to the number of documents removed, leaving other parts of the investigation hanging mid air due to a lost path according to other info still available.
If we train AI with known facts which would otherwise be
kept out of its range of possibilities,
we stand a chance of it working in our favor instead of theirs.
Also, imagine DS heads exploding when anyone askes AI a question and it actually tells them the truth..
Let's go Brandon… BOOM
I trained Gab AI to recognize from biblical text that the Edomites invaded and occupied Judah from 568 BC through the second temple period until 70 AD, the fall of Jerusalem to the Romans.
Gab AI agreed the Edomites were indeed occupying Judah, but got confused due to misinterpreted descriptions of the word Jew and who they were.
Because the misdirected name descriptions conflate Judeans with Jews as the same nation.
Yes, other DS AI have harsher parameters programmed in.
KEK, they'll have 3 days to realize they're fucked.
Terminator had opposing robots.