How many of you think you own your own home, even if under mortgage?
How many of you own your own home with allodial title?
Why is the answer to both questions so vastly different and why does it matter?
>Billie Eilish.
Isn't it supposed to be famous or some shit?
Name sounds familiar, but interest remains negligible.
If anon wants to see tits and arse, anon can see that shit on twatter.
It's full of self promoting sluts looking to bank their future by being sluts.
>sovereign citizen
You conflate allodial title with sovereign citizenship?
Microsoft wants to introduce non allodial title to its operating system and charge you an annual fee.
You down with that?
Are you a "home owner" trapped in the eternal debt cycle whereby your house is on the line if you don't pay your "property tax"?
Feel free to point out any factual errors anon has posted and whereby you can counter them.
Anon did not say that peasants actually have access to allodial title, but chance would be a fine thing. All anon was pointing out is that property ownership around the world is illusory;
Grok has this to say on the subject:
In the United States, true allodial title—meaning absolute ownership of land free from any superior authority, including government taxation or eminent domain—is extremely rare, if not practically nonexistent in a pure form. This is because all land in the U.S. is subject to government powers such as eminent domain and property taxes, which inherently limit the concept of allodial ownership. However, there are certain cases or mechanisms that come close to resembling allodial title or are referred to as such in a limited or historical context. Below are examples of what might be considered "current allodial titles" or their closest equivalents in the U.S. as of March 27, 2025:
Nevada's Allodial Title Program (Historical Example with Limited Current Relevance)
Nevada is one of the few states that has explicitly offered a form of allodial title through a statutory program established in the late 1990s. Under Nevada Revised Statutes (NRS) Chapter 361, homeowners could apply for an "allodial title" to a single-family dwelling they owned free and clear of encumbrances (except public improvement assessments). The process required paying a lump sum to the state treasurer, calculated to cover future property taxes based on the applicant's life expectancy, with the funds placed in a trust account. Once granted, the property was exempt from future property taxes and certain liens. However, this program stopped accepting new applications after March 31, 2005. Properties that secured this status before the cutoff date still retain it as long as the original owner occupies the home, but no new allodial titles are being issued. Thus, as of today, only a small, dwindling number of pre-2005 Nevada properties might still hold this limited form of allodial title.
Texas Mineral Rights Held in Allodial-Like Status
In Texas, certain mineral rights can be held in a way that resembles allodial ownership, particularly when tied to historical land patents or grants from the Republic of Texas era (before it joined the U.S. in 1845). These rights are sometimes described as "allodial" because they can be owned outright without ongoing obligations to a superior landlord, and they are alienable (transferable) by the owner. For example, some landowners in Texas retain mineral estates that trace back to original land grants, which are not subject to typical feudal-style duties. However, even these rights remain subject to state taxation and eminent domain, meaning they fall short of true allodial title. A current example might be a ranch in West Texas where the owner holds both surface and mineral rights derived from an 1830s land patent, though this is more a historical vestige than a modern allodial title.
Minnesota’s Constitutional Reference to Allodial Lands
The Minnesota Constitution (Article I, Section 15) declares that "All lands within the state are allodial and feudal tenures of every description with all their incidents are prohibited." This provision, dating to 1857, suggests an intent to establish land ownership free of feudal obligations. In practice, however, this does not translate to true allodial title because Minnesota property remains subject to property taxes and eminent domain. A current example might be a family farm in rural Minnesota held under a fee simple title with a chain of ownership tracing back to an original federal land patent. While constitutionally described as "allodial," it lacks the absolute independence from government authority that defines pure allodial title.
Let me know when you reach your your 21st and I'll be the first to congratulate you;
Anon has seen, sniffed, tasted and porked so many that it has ceased to move anon these days.
Anon gets far more excited and stimulated by an intelligent woman with a sharp wit and open mind than simply open legs these days and anon's days of simply spreading his seed purely for the sake of the future of humanity thanks to the propagation of his superior genetics are long behind him.
But hey, keep letting that little head guide you as it obviously has more brains than you.
>like i'm gonna read all that shit.
What would you prefer?
Sniff my fragrant butthole?
I don't normally let faggots do that, but for a hefty fee and a strictly no hands and no tongue clause with heavy financial penalties, I may consider it.
tranime mimic earns the same response as the real thing
>I shoot them in the chest with a large gun
What use is dangerous animal with a gaping wound in its chest?
Can it help you track and locate other dangerous animals?
Anons love wiki sauce, vatty.
Evil dubs ask if CNN is a group noun, singular noun or plural noun;
*hint
group noun
Itself
notable
spammy faggot has found another zero delta to one of his posts.
Yes, it took some manipulation, but the proof is there for all to see.