Morning anons…

>>22828565

Ty bake!

TheSIGNALfiasco is getting interesting. Yesterday we had congressional testimony from the head NPR = Katherine Maher and the head of PBS.

https://x.com/War_Hamster1776/status/1905215432941797414

Katherine Maher has found her way into some conversations this week after her testimony yesterday.

As a reminder, her background includes stints at: World Bank, UNICEF, National Democrat Institute, State Dept., & CRF. She's got ties to Blinken and John Brennan.

Basically a perfect regime change resume:

In addition to this, she sits on the Board of Directors for the Signal Foundation. This is the parent organization for the Signal app that's also in the news this week.

So I decided to looking into the Signal Foundation's funding, and look what we find: The first entry for their funding is a $54 million grant from the US Agency for Global Media:

So who is the USAGM?

They over see the following agencies, all of which have been used for CIA regime change operations:

-Voice of America

-Radio Fee Europe/Radio Liberty

-Office of Cuba Broadcasting

-Radio Free Asia

-Middle East Broadcasting Networks

-Open Technology Fund

If we look into USAGM's list of Former Governors,

We find none other than one Hillary Rodham Clinton:

If we scroll down a bit further on that list, we find none other than Skull & Bones alumni John Forbes Kerry.

Bahahahahaah (and probably why we have a German shill today)…

France and England willNECK THEMSELVESover Ukraine.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/kiev-demands-europe-send-combat-ready-troops-warmonger/

"As the Trump-brokered Peace Process between Russia and Ukraine sees progress but faces the inevitable difficulties, Europeans continues to try to escalate the situation with the convoluted plans by UK’s Keir Starmer and France’s Emmanuel Macron.

Their talk of ‘boots in the ground’ will never prosper, because Moscow has repeatedly said that it will never agree to any proposal for NATO countries to send ‘peacekeepers’ to Ukraine.

Today, European madness sent out two contrasting signals at the same time: strategic ambiguity or simple lack of common purpose?

The reason is lack of member support, logistical impossibilities and, of course the opposition by Donald J. Trump and Vladimir Putin.

Diplomats now admit the growing acceptance of the fact that ‘sending such a force is not the likeliest outcome’.

“They are taking a step back from ground troops and trying to re-dimension what they were doing to something that could be more sensible,” said one European diplomat.

Said another: “When Ukraine was in a better position, the idea of sending troops appealed. But now, with the situation on the ground and the U.S administration as it is, it’s not very sexy.”

For one, a Kiev high-level official has come out and stated that ‘European troops must be ready to fight’ if they are sent as peacekeepers in any future peace deal between Ukraine and Russia.

Basically, this confirms that the Volodymyr Zelensky regime Ukraine views European military support ‘not as a deterrence mechanism, but as an escalation tool’.

“’We don’t need a mere presence to showcase that Europe is present’, Igor Zhovkva, a top Ukrainian negotiator, said ahead of an international summit in Paris.‘It’s not the amount which matters… it’s also their readiness to fight, their readiness to defend, their readiness to be equipped, and their readiness to understand that Ukraine is an inevitable part of European security’, he said.”

>>22828630

France’s Macron, never to lose a chance to grandstand, said today (26) that an eventual European force deployed to Ukraine could ‘respond’ to an equally hypothetical Russian attack.

Associated Press reported:

“’If there was again a generalized aggression against Ukrainian soil, these armies would be under attack and then it’s our usual framework of engagement’, Macron said. ‘Our soldiers, when they are engaged and deployed, are there to react and respond to the decisions of the commander in chief and, if they are in a conflict situation, to respond to it’.

He said the proposed European forces wouldn’t be stationed in the frontlines in Ukraine, ‘nor be engaged on the first day opposite Russian forces’. They would ‘be forces that dissuade the Russians from attacking again. And by holding important towns, strategic bases, mark the clear support from several European governments and allies’, he said.

‘So we are not on the frontlines, we don’t go to fight, but we are there to guarantee a lasting peace. It’s a pacifist approach’, he said. ‘The only ones who would, at that moment, trigger a conflict, a bellicose situation, would be the Russians if they decided again to launch an aggression’.”

>>22828632

>>22828596

So…if the US agency for global mediaFUNDS SIGNALthen that would mean the three letters are deep in that app…

That would also mean that the Atlantic has some kind of hacking ability or control over that app.

Further, the fact that the media won't leave it alone is another GLOWING RED LIGHT.

The governmentSPYING INFRASTRUCTUREis on tap…