Jeffrey Goldberg Gives Cryptic Response When Asked About His Relationship with Mike Waltz

by Cristina Laila Mar. 27, 2025 7:4

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg gavesomewhat of a cryptic response when CBS News asked him about his relationship with National Security Advisor Mike Waltz.

President Trump, for now, is standing by his National Security Advisor Mike Waltz after Deep State reporter Jeffrey Goldberg was added to a Signal chat group.

However, Mike Waltz’s relationship with Jeffrey Goldberg has come into question after a screenshot of the Signal group clearly shows Waltz added The Atlantic editor to the “Houthi PC small group.”

It was reported on Monday that Jeffrey Goldberg, the anti-Trump editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, claimed he was accidentally added to a secure Signal group chat where top Trump administration officials discussed sensitive military operations against Iran-backed Houthi terrorists in Yemen.

People were interested in these podcasts

According to Jeffrey Goldberg, National Security Adviser Mike Waltz, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and Vice President JD Vance were in a Signal group called “Houthi PC small group,” discussing plans to strike terrorists in Yemen.

After the first release of chats from the Signal group, Jeffrey Goldberg vowed to release the ‘war plans’ discussed in the text chain.

Goldberg released the second round of messages from the chat group on Wednesday at it was clear that he over promised and under delivered.

Although no war plans were discussed in the “Houthi PC small group” on Signal, the main question is, how did Mike Waltz add Jeffrey Goldberg to the chat group if he insists he has never spoken to him? How was Jeffrey Goldberg in his phone contacts?

On Tuesday evening, Mike Waltz said he takes full responsibility for what happened since he is the one who created the Signal chat group.

Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham could not understand how Jeffrey Goldberg ended up in Mike Waltz’s phone in the first place if he has never spoken to him before.

“But you’ve never talked to him [Jeffrey Goldberg] before, so how’s the number on your phone?” Laura Ingraham asked Waltz.

Waltz replied, “Well, if you have =somebody else’s contact and then somehow it gets sucked in, it gets sucked in.”==

Although Mike Waltz insists he has never spoken to Jeffrey Goldberg, it appears they might actually know each other.

According to investigative reporter Paul Sperry, Mike Waltz was a source for Jeffrey Goldberg while he was serving on the House Intel Committee.

Per Paul Sperry: Though Waltz insists, “I wasn’t talking to [Goldberg],” a US intel official told me Waltz was a source for Goldberg while on HPSCI. “There’s no need for an investigation to figure out how he was added to the chat.Goldberg was in his address book b/c he’s been talking to him”

Additionally, Mike Waltz attended an event moderated by Jeffrey Goldberg in 2021.

Waltz was photographed standing near Goldberg.

Jeffrey Goldberg raised eyebrows when asked about his relationship with Mike Waltz.

“I’m just not going to comment on my relationship with Mike Waltz,” Jeffrey Goldberg told CBS Newsin an interview Wednesday.

When asked about the photos of him standing near Mike Waltz at an event in 2021, Goldberg said, “If your eyeballs see us together, then I guess your eyeballs are seeing us together.”

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/jeffrey-goldberg-gives-cryptic-response-when-asked-about/

To be clear, Sundance said Waltz would be the first one fired from Trump’s team. He’s hardly ever wrong.

>>22831570

Agreed, he knew, he heard things from Saudi Arabia. They are not there to just listen but to identify

Appeals court halts Chutkan’s order for DOGE records

Ella Lee

Wed, March 26, 2025 at 5:56 PM EDT

Wed, March 26, 2025 at 5:56 PM EDT

A federal appeals court on Wednesday temporarily blocked an order from U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan directing Elon Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) to turn over records and answer questions about its efforts to slash the federal bureaucracy.

A three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit granted a stay of Chutkan’s directive, suggesting that the lower court judge must rule on the Trump administration’s motion to dismiss before allowing any discovery. It’s not a final ruling on whether DOGE must eventually turn over the records.

Soon after the panel’s decision, Chutkan canceled a status hearing scheduled for Thursday.

Chutkan’s order granting discovery marked the first time a judge ordered Musk to produce documents in a legal challenge to his and DOGE’s efforts to downsize the federal government and cut costs.

She said her order was meant to allow identification of DOGE personnel and “the parameters of DOGE’s and Musk’s authority.”

The request for information about DOGE came in a lawsuit by a coalition of states, led by New Mexico, which claims Musk’s vast role heading DOGE is unconstitutional since he wasn’t confirmed by the Senate. They’re seeking to block DOGE from accessing seven federal agencies.

Though the billionaire tech mogul is said to be leading DOGE’s sweeping cost-cutting efforts,the White House has maintained that Musk is not technically a part of DOGE, instead serving as a senior adviser to the president.

Chutkan, an appointee of former President Biden who also oversaw the federal election subversion criminal case against President Trump, previously declined to grant the request from the 14 Democratic state attorneys general for a temporary restraining order after finding they had not made the necessary showing of irreparable harm.

However, in a footnote, the judge suggested that the Justice Department may have stretched the truth in court filings regarding the breadth of DOGE’s power over personnel issues. She reminded the government of its duty to “make truthful representations to the court.”

DOGE has drawn dozens of legal challenges over its rapid efforts to install employees at federal agencies with an aim of cutting trillions of dollars in government spending.

The Democratic-led states are seeking to block Musk and DOGE agents from accessing confidential data at the Office of Personnel Management, the Department of Education, the Department of Labor, the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Energy, the Department of Transportation and the Department of Commerce.(so they revealed all agencies that give money to democrats, thank you assholes)

https://www.yahoo.com/news/appeals-court-halts-chutkan-order-215647539.html

White Dems Tell Detroit Black Election Integrity Activists they are “Dangerous,” “Extreme,” pushing “Poll Taxes” for Speaking up about 2020 Voter Fraud 1/2

by Assistant Editor Mar. 27, 2025

Earlier this week, two strong election integrity voices from Michigan, Ramon Jackson and Pastor Lorenzo Sewell, came in and testified before Rep. Rachelle Smit’s Election Integrity Committee,as part of Smit’s effort to document evidence of voter fraud in Michigan’s past election cycles.

Yesterday TGP’s Patty McMurray covered the hearing in detail, showinghow the two activists spent months documenting Detroit voter fraud and figuring out exactly how Democrats are committing the fraud. And again today TGP’s Patty McMurray went into more detail covering the way in which this systemic voter fraud happened.

The Democrat voter fraud scheme is to use an identified transient population, people who often move and change addresses, using those people for absentee ballots. The Detroit activists have documentedpeople who voted in-person on days they were out-of-state, and people who are said to have voted from addresses that they have long ago left. They also documented ballots cast in the name of people who were living in other states, and voting in other states, without a Michigan driver’s license.

Democrats are now responding with name-calling and by employing their media allies to use racist tropes to dismiss these activists.

Democrats have responded and their only argument is to use epithets andracially-coded-language that these courageous men are “election deniers” and seeking to reimpose a racist ‘poll tax’ to deny blacks the right to vote.

White Democrats are telling Black leaders that they are racist for wanting to protect their right to vote, and the right for their votes to count.

You can hear the sneering elite condescension in their left-wing voices as they talk down to the Detroit activists seeking to protect their integrity, identity, and political choices.

“The election deniers in today’s committee hearing are yet another sign that Michigan Republicans are untetheredfrom fact and reality when it comes to our elections,” saidChair of the Michigan Democratic Party Curtis Hertel saidin a press release. “Along with the poll tax bills that jeopardize thousands of voters’ access to the ballot box,Michigan Republicans are making it clear that safe and secure elections are not their goal.”

Here is the press release from Michigan’s Democrat Party:

What they found was that a certain type of resident was having their votes and identities stolen. Likely through the ERIC system, a segment of the population that are largely transient and who often move, were having their votes taken. This population does not live in one spot, but it is very difficult to prove where they lived at a specific time

Democrats are trying to pressure Rep. Rachelle Smit to drop this line of investigation, because they claim, it’s not what they ran for office on. Rep. Stephen Wooden (D-Grand Rapids) further complained that claims of voter fraud in the 2020 election were already five years old and so it was of little interest or consequence.

Democrat detractorspointed out in the MIRS News service, a special high-priced blog catering to Michigan’s lobbyists, using a variety of scare quotesand demeaning language to marginalize andsilence these Black voices speaking the truth: that the 2020 election was riddled with systemic voter fraud.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/white-dems-tell-detroit-black-election-integrity-activists/

>>22831724

2/2

Statehouse news reporting often launders Democrat priorities through this process: where glorified blogs like MIRS News put a far-left spin on inconvenient facts for Democrats. Then local outlets and state bloggers, in Michigan’s case an example here would be the Detroit News’ discredited and disgraced Craig Mauger, to then report on MIRS’ original reporting. Then national outlets like the Associated Press, the New York Times, and the Washington Post, simply regurgitate the narrative framing and dismissive tones of the original work.

Head of the Michigan Democrats Curtis Hertel, and his allies at MIRS News, work together to use racist tropes in order to dismiss the claims of these impassioned Detroit activists.

Here’s a snapshot of the 701 word article about the incident in MIRS News:

Here is a summary of MIRS’ coverage and the way it is meant to undermine and dismiss these voter fraud witnesses:

Stereotyping of these Black religious leaders as grifters or hucksters.

Mockery of Black vernacular or preaching styles.

Undermining legitimacy through dishonest framing (linking them to President Trump, highlighting the lawsuit dismissal, noting the request for donations).

Gatekeeping via establishment voices questioning the right of these individuals to speak or be taken seriously.

These are the tactics that theDemocrats and the media are going to use to suppress these courageous Detroit whistleblowers who are documenting the systemic voter fraud in 2020that shifted Michigan from a Trump win to a Trump loss utilizing absentee ballot fraud, among other tactics, to deliver the election to Joe Biden and his allies.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/white-dems-tell-detroit-black-election-integrity-activists/

jay plemons

@jayplemons

Department of Imaginary Concerns

Signal app drama has Scott Adams proposing a bold fix: a new gov’t dept to tackle all the wild, made-up fears swirling in Democrat minds. Genius or madness? You decide.

Imaginary Concerns like:

Climate change crisis

Russia collusion

Houthi’s could have found out by hacking signal

Trump might steal your democracy

Musk might steal our social security numbers

@ScottAdamsSays

1:50 PM · Mar 27, 2025

·49.5K Views

https://x.com/jayplemons/status/1905316502364192850

1:45

>>22831743

That was one of his best dialogue

¡SHARIA WILL NOT PASS! Texas confronts the islamic threat with a firm hand. 1/2

Rafa Gómez-Santos Martín Mar. 27, 2025

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched a forceful investigation into a real estate project linked to the East Plano Islamic Center (EPIC), known as EPIC City, a 402-acre development in Josephine, Texas, intended to be a Muslim stronghold with a mosque, Islamic schools, and over 1,000 homes.

Paxton issued a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) to Community Capital Partners, LP (CCP), the entity behind the project, to examine potential violations of Texas consumer protection laws, according to an official statement from his office.

This move comes after weeks of controversy, following Governor Greg Abbott’s denunciation of the project as having “serious legal issues” and his assertion that “Sharia law is not allowed in Texas, nor are Sharia cities or no-go zones.”

EPIC City, promoted by the East Plano Islamic Center, has been accused of attempting to establish a community that could incorporate elements of Sharia law, something Republican State Representative Jeff Leach of Plano called a threat to Texas laws in a letter to Paxton.

The project includes plans for a mosque, a faith-based K-12 school, senior housing, a community center, and a college, all funded through the sale of $80,000 shares to buyers, according to Yasir Qadhi, a resident scholar at EPIC.

However, alarm bells rang when it was revealed that EPIC is the “sole beneficiary of the profits” from EPIC City, according to the center’s own promotional materials, raising suspicions about the project’s transparency.

Paxton’s investigation aims to uncover any legal violations, and the CID could lead to fines, investor refunds, or even a court order to halt the project if irregularities are found, such as potential violations of the Fair Housing Act.

Abbott and Paxton are not alone: X users have expressed outrage, with viral posts warning about the “endgame” of Islamic communities that, according to them, do not seek to assimilate but to impose their own laws.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations has criticized these actions, alleging they demonize Muslims, but Paxton and Abbott stand firm, prioritizing Texas sovereignty over what they consider a covert threat.

The controversy fits into a broader context: Texas is considering becoming the first U.S. state to officially ban Sharia law, a measure gaining traction among conservatives.

https://gatewayhispanic.com/2025/03/sharia-will-not-pass-texas-confronts-the-islamic/

>>22831767

2/2

During his first term, President Trump took drastic measures against Muslim immigration, including a travel ban on majority-Muslim countries, and in 2025, he signed an executive order to review the entry of nationals from countries with “deficient vetting.”

This showdown in Texas reflects a larger struggle for American identity, where progressive open-border policies have, according to critics, allowed foreign ideologies to infiltrate under the guise of diversity.

Enough with progressive nonsense! Texas, under the leadership of Paxton and Abbott, is sending a clear message: we will not yield to Islamization nor allow Sharia law to creep onto American soil, and with Trump in the White House, this battle will intensify until any attempt to undermine our Christian and patriotic values is crushed.

Let the leftists cry and the globalists tremble: Trump’s America and Texas will not bow to anyone, and Sharia will be eradicated once and for all!

About The Author

Rafa Gómez-Santos Martín

Rafael Santos is a Portuguese writer and political analyst dedicated to educating Hispanics on traditional values and the importance of protecting children and families. With years of experience in media and public discourse, he has been a strong advocate for cultural preservation and moral principles in an ever-changing world. Passionate about culture, sports, and current affairs, Rafael brings insightful analysis to political and social debates, striving to empower the Hispanic community with knowledge and a deeper understanding of the issues that shape their lives.

https://gatewayhispanic.com/2025/03/sharia-will-not-pass-texas-confronts-the-islamic/

Fuck that shit, it’s gone too far

Ilhan Omar Initiating Impeachment Efforts for Multiple Trump Admin Officials: Report

Joe Saunders, The Western Journal Mar. 27, 2025

The drama surrounding President Donald Trump’s top defense team this week is getting a backstage twist.

Minnesota Democrat Ilhan Omar, one of the most polarizing members of the polarizing group known as the “squad,”is shopping plans behind the scenes to launch impeachment efforts as a result of the controversythat’s become known as “Signalgate,” according to the Beltway-centric news outlets Axios.

Omar’s targets are some of the biggest names in Trump’s administration,but the online backlash might not be quite what she was expecting.

According to the Axios report Thursday, which cited unnamed sources,Omar is trying to convince fellow Democratsbehind the scenes to move forwardwith impeachingDefense Secretary Pete Hegseth, National Security Advisor Michael Waltz, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.

All three were part of a chat group on the encrypted messaging app Signal that discussed a March 15 strike by the United States military on the Houthi terrorist group in Yemen. Also in that group, included accidentally, was Jeffrey Goldberg*, the editor-in-chief of the liberal magazine The Atlantic. Goldberg is a journalist with a history of attacking Trump.

(*He was the man who publicized the claim that Trump had insulted American Marines who gave their lives during World War I.)

When Goldberg published a report about the Yemen conversation in The Atlantic on Monday, he unleashed the young Trump administration’s most serious controversy to date. It’s a controversy that has stirred Omar to start talking impeachment, according to Axios.

“The high-profile progressive has been pushing the idea of impeachmentamong fellow House Democrats, a senior House Democrat and another source familiar with the matter told Axios,” the outlet reported.

Considering that any impeachment effort against the Trump administration is virtually certain to fail in the current Congress, where Republicans hold a majority in both the House and the Senate, the motivation for Omar to act isn’t the likelihood of success.

Instead, it’s more likely a public relations exercise— political theater to paint Trump as a villain and show his supporting cast in the worst possible light.

But with reactions on the social mediaplatform X showing an overwhelming majority of commenters blasting Omar, an impeachment stunt is likely to only backfire for Democrats as a whole.

A quick survey of X foundonly a single post supporting Omar. That post — from a leftist social media activist — was quickly inundated with responses attacking her or defending the Trump officials.

Outside of that post, the rest were ridiculing Omar, a native of Somalia and one of only two Muslim women to serve in Congress. (The other is fellow “squad” member Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat.)

Here’s a fair sampling of the reaction as a whole, as of about 4:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time:

(To be fair, the story got a much friendlier reception from posts on Bluesky.But a liberal silo of a social media platform created specifically to be of, by and for the lefties is not exactly a reflection of America writ large.)

Omar has a history of being melodramatically partisan.It’s possible that Democrats as a whole better understand the realities of majority rule in Congress better than the Minnesota rep and her far-left “squad” members.

In its report,Axios cited a Democratic leadership source who called it an “unlikely scenario” that the party would attempt impeachment proceedings while in the minority in the House.

If that’s the case, the 2026 midterms are still 18 months away, but getting more important by the day.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/ilhan-omar-initiating-impeachment-efforts-multiple-trump-admin/

Your day is coming bitch when you try to impeach others, you impeach yourself

>>22831860

This woman faked she didn’t read multiple books. Who forgets the books they’ve read?

>>22831855

Kek

>>22831793

Agreed MTG’s voice gets on my nerves. And I’ve only heard her voice a couple of times

>>22831777

What to hell is that?

>>22831957

Never mind

>>22831760

That may be so, the currying will come soon

>>22831754

When was that recorded. It is true in some areas. My big problem I have a lot of Muslims and Hispanics in a pretty wealthy neighborhood and none of them use English and no one says hello. When I moved in 2007 it was a huge difference, when Bidan got in it changed over night. I can’t understand how they can afford it.

Jon Stewart Loses His Mind Listening to How Biden and Democrats Were Implementing Failed ‘Rural Broadband’ Program(VIDEO)

by Mike LaChance Mar. 27, 2025 9:40

Jon Stewart recently spoke to liberal New York Times columnist Ezra Klein, who explained to him the absurd miles of governmental red tape involved in implementing the plan for installing rural broadband.

Ezra Klein clearly suggests that Joe Biden and Democrats thought this was a winning idea because the issue polled very well and rural broadband is a thing that is actually needed in this country.

The funny thing about the video is watching Jon Stewart lose his mind in real time as Ezra takes him through the bureaucratic steps that are necessary for states to implement the plan.

This is a lesson in the ineffectiveness of big government.

Partial transcript via Eric Abbenante on Twitter/X:

Ezra Klein: “We have to issue the notice funding opportunity within 180 days that’s step one.

Step Two: States who want to participate must submit a letter of intent. After they do that, they can submit a request for up to $5 million in planning grants. Then the NTIA Step Four has to review and approve an award again. States who want to participate must submit that letter of intent.

Step three: “They can request up to $5 million in planning grants. Just planning, just planning.

Step four : “The requests are reviewed, approved and awarded by the NTIA.” States must submit a five year action plan. All 56 had passed through at least step 5, it took more than 3 years.

[Step 6] Then the FCC, must publish the broadband data maps before NTIA allocates funds. So having done the no vote. So the letters of intent, the the the request for planning grants, then the review approval and awarding of the planning grants, then the five year action plans in between that the federal government has to put forward a map saying where it thinks we need rural broadband subsidies. And then, of course, the states need an opportunity to challenge the map for accuracy.

step seven So then the NTIAhas to use the FCC maps to make allocation decisions. It’s hard even to talk about this, man.

Step eight is states must submit an initial proposal to the NTIA.”

Jon Stewart: “But then what was the five year plan and what the fuck did they apply for?”

Ezra Klein: “Step nine NTIA must review and approve each state’s again initial proposal. By my read, we have had at least two initial proposals here, but that’s a different issue.

Step ten. States must publish their own map and allow internal challenges to their own map.

That’s not even all of it, there are still more steps. Watch this:

Is there any wonder why this program failed? Liberals took an incredibly popular issue and buried it in government regulations and multiple departments. This is why something like DOGE is needed.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/jon-stewart-loses-his-mind-listening-how-biden/

https://x.com/EricAbbenante/status/1905422938352091313

>>22832007

Conclusion they NEVER intended of instituting Broadband in Rural areas and they spent all the money in Ukraine. Elon could have implemented in two days. With a 100th of the cost. Why would Bidan want to spend the money of rural people, they would never vote for him.

>>22832007

Eric Abbenante

@EricAbbenante

Jon Stewart screams 'OMFG' and is rendered speechless after hearing all 14 steps to apply for 'Build Back Better' funding:

Ezra Klein: "We have to issue the notice funding opportunity within 180 days that's step one.

Step Two: States who want to participate must submit a letter of intent. After they do that, they can submit a request for up to $5 million in planning grants.

Then the NTIA Step Four has to review and approve an award again. States who want to participate must submit that letter of intent.

Step three: "They can request up to $5 million in planning grants. Just planning, just planning.

Step four : "The requests are reviewed, approved and awarded by the NTIA." States must submit a five year action plan. All 56 had passed through at least step 5, it took more than 3 years.

[Step 6] Then the FCC, must publish the broadband data maps before NTIA allocates funds. So having done the no vote. So the letters of intent, the the the request for planning grants, then the review approval and awarding of the planning grants, then the five year action plans in between that the federal government has to put forward a map saying where it thinks we need rural broadband subsidies. And then, of course, the states need an opportunity to challenge the map for accuracy.

step seven So then the NTIAhas to use the FCC maps to make allocation decisions. It's hard even to talk about this, man.

Step eight is states must submit an initial proposal to the NTIA."

Jon Stewart: "But then what was the five year plan and what the fuck did they apply for?"

Ezra Klein: "Step nine NTIA must review and approve each state's again initial proposal. By my read, we have had at least two initial proposals here, but that's a different issue.

Step ten. States must publish their own map and allow internal challenges to their own map.

Step 11 the NTIA must review and improve the challenge results and the final map. So the NCAA has put forward a map.

Step 12 states must run a competitive sub granting process."

Jon Stewart: "Oh, my fucking God. At step 12. After all this has been done!?"

Ezra Klein: "Step 13 States must submit a final proposal. This all all the proposals weren't enough to NTIA. Now that goes to three of 56.

Step 14 the NTIA must review and approve the state's final proposal. And that is three of the 56 jurisdictions. And states are there."

Jon Stewart: "I'm speechless."

Jon just learned why "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help'"

https://x.com/EricAbbenante/status/1905422938352091313

Marco Rubio Perfectly Explains to the Media Why Some Students Are Losing Their Visas and Getting Deported (VIDEO)

by Mike LaChance Mar. 27, 2025 10:20

Secretary of State Marco Rubio was asked on Thursday to explain why a Tufts student from Turkey had her visa revoked and is now slated for deportation.

.His answer could not have been more perfect.

Rubio calmly explained to the assembled journalists that coming to the United States to study at a college or university is a privilege and not a right, and that if people come here to destroy, harass, and take over college buildings, they will be sent packing.

He uses the analogy of inviting someone into your home. If a guest began vandalizing and destroying your home, you would eject that person.

Transcript via Real Clear Politics:

QUESTION: Mr. Secretary, a Turkish student in Boston was detained and handcuffed on the street by plainclothes agents. A year ago, she wrote an opinion piece about the Gaza war.

Could you help us understand what the specific action she took that led to her visa being revoked and what was your State Department’s role in that process?

SECRETARY OF STATE MARCO RUBIO: We revoked her visa. It’s an F1 visa, I believe. We revoked it, and here’s why, and I’ll say it again. I’ve said it everywhere. Let me be abundantly clear, OK?

If you go apply for a visa right now anywhere in the world, let me just send this message out. If you apply for a visa to enter the United States and be a student, and you tell us that the reason why you’re coming to the United States is not just because you want to write op-eds, but because you want to participate in movements that are involved in doing things like vandalizing universities, harassing students, taking over buildings, creating a ruckus, we’re not gonna give you a visa.

If you lie to us and get a visa and then enter the United States and with that visa participate in that sort of activity, we’re gonna take away your visa. And once you’ve lost your visa, you’re no longer legally in the United States, and we have a right, like every country in the world has a right, to remove you from our country. So it’s just that simple.

I think it’s crazy. I think it’s stupid for any country in the world to welcome people into their country — they’re going to go to your universities as visitors, they’re visitors, and say, “I’m going to your universities to start a riot. I’m going to your universities to take over a library and harass people.”

I don’t care what movement you’re involved in. Why would any country in the world allow people to come and disrupt?

We gave you a visa to come and study and get a degree, not to become a social activist that tears up our university campuses.

Watch all of this, it’s great:

Rubio could not have been more clear and his response could not have been more logical. What is it about this that the left just doesn’t seem to understand?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/03/marco-rubio-perfectly-explains-media-why-some-students/

Bostonians Against Mayor Wu

@AntiWuCoalition

Secretary of State Marco Rubio offers an explanation for deporting alleged terrorist sympathizer and Tufts PhD student Rumeysa Ozturk:

“Let me be abundantly clear: If you apply for a student visa to come to the United States and you say you’re coming not just to study, but to participate in movements that vandalize universities, harass students, take over buildings, and cause chaos—we’re not giving you that visa.

If you lie, get the visa, and then engage in that kind of behavior once you’re here, we’re going to revoke it.”

https://x.com/AntiWuCoalition/status/1905373217621246300

>>22832068

Now it’s time for Marco and the State Dept to eliminate and or send back the radical professors that invited the terrorists here. Even if they are not from a radical country, arrest them for cultivating a radical evolution to destroy America. Yuri B said this would happen. Interrogate every professor in all colleges. If they are radicalizing the students put them in jail, along with the Admin that allows it