Anonymous ID: 70e2fe March 29, 2025, 4:17 a.m. No.22837623   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7636

>>22837619

>He's not catching it.

The movement just looked off when anon first saw it with the rattler actually jumping into his hands.

When anon reversed the vid, it looked so much more natural.

Anonymous ID: 70e2fe March 29, 2025, 4:21 a.m. No.22837629   🗄️.is 🔗kun

So, I guess we've cycled on from Pam blonde woman bad to RFK Jr bad.

Wonder who will be the next guest appearance.

Anonymous ID: 70e2fe March 29, 2025, 5:25 a.m. No.22837715   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7805

>>22837705

You know what makes you such a cunt?

The size of your coppasta.

One cannot simply scroll past it in a single click; one has to scroll, scroll, scroll, scroll.

DIAF faggot

Anonymous ID: 70e2fe March 29, 2025, 5:29 a.m. No.22837727   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22837707

>there is something fun and exciting about a pretty, psycho Hispanic female

Never stick your dick in crazy. but what a fucking ride!

On the bus, some shrubbery in the middle of the road affording a modicum of camouflage, she didn't didn't care. Fuck me now, you savage rascal.

Anonymous ID: 70e2fe March 29, 2025, 6:06 a.m. No.22837834   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7879 >>7998

>>22837778

>You wanna fuck with the bakers you gotta go thru me first.

Challenge accepted

A few days ago, a notetaker dropped some notes with one note replete with repeated words and phrases in the title rendering it into gibberish.

When anon brought it to the attention of the baker who had stepped up and suggested removing the repeated words, retarded baker gibbered some nonsense about which of my posts I thought was notable. I disabused retarded baker of this retardation and pointed I was merely suggesting baker remove the repeated words to make it legible.

Retarded baker (in reality BV) ranted that baker's don't fuck with previous baker's notes.

No amount of explaining that it was a notetaker and not a baker nor editing a note title to make it legible was not fucking with a previous baker's notes would move the retard's position and retarded baker (bv) posted said gibberish verbatim.

You defend this shit?

Or are you said retarded bv?

Anonymous ID: 70e2fe March 29, 2025, 6:11 a.m. No.22837853   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22837782

Some non C_A discussion on the subject

https://danellaconsulting.net/index.php/2022/11/25/the-law-that-never-was-true-story-about-the-16-amendment-ratification-in-1913/

https://michaelruark.wordpress.com/2020/09/12/states-did-not-legally-ratify-the-16th-amendment/

https://theamericanview.com/blogs/constitution-course-supplemental-assignments/defects-in-ratification-of-the-16th-amendment

Anonymous ID: 70e2fe March 29, 2025, 6:18 a.m. No.22837879   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22837834 Personally, anon believes this unwritten rule of not fucking with previous baker's notes was instigated and promulgated by shills who wanted to guarantee their shill faggotry was not removed from notes.

Anonymous ID: 70e2fe March 29, 2025, 6:45 a.m. No.22837957   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7962

>>22837778

>Columbo famefaggot

Should have guessed you were a famefag homo faggot, cocksucking knobjockey.

You faggots really do stick together in a manner anon considers unnatural.

Sodomy literally means sticking dicks in stinky brown holes.

Anonymous ID: 70e2fe March 29, 2025, 7:09 a.m. No.22838049   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8055 >>8081

>>22838026

Unfortunately, many of current bakers are also BVs and anon trusts this current admin as far as anon can kick them uphill during a hurricane.

Anon loathes their deletion and bread locking faggotry, to say nothing of BO's demand for bloatables and repeatables.