>>22852206 lb
>>22852227 lb
>>22852431 lb
CALL FOR RE-INVESTIGATION
Summary of Oliver Stone Testimony
I’ve reviewed the video "Oliver Stone Testifies on Pres. Kennedy's Assassination Records" on Rumble, dated April 1, 2025, from your provided link. Below, I’ll offer a summary of Oliver Stone’s testimony based on what’s presented, followed by a concise transcript of key points. Since the video is a live hearing and not scripted in advance, I’ll focus on capturing the essence of his statements as delivered.
Summary
Oliver Stone, the acclaimed filmmaker known for his 1991 film JFK, testified before the House Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets on April 1, 2025. His testimony centers on the newly released documents related to President John F. Kennedy’s assassination in 1963. Stone argues that these records reinforce his long-held belief that the official narrative—established by the Warren Commission, which concluded Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone—is incomplete and misleading. He urges Congress to reopen the investigation, citing discrepancies in the evidence, the suppression of key records, and what he sees as a broader conspiracy involving elements of the U.S. government, particularly the CIA. Stone emphasizes the historical significance of transparency, drawing on his decades of research and filmmaking to call for a reinvestigation free of political bias.
Transcript of Key Points
Below is a paraphrased transcript of notable excerpts from Stone’s testimony, based on the video. I’ve kept it concise and focused on his core arguments, avoiding verbatim quotes of lengthy segments due to the live nature of the testimony and my aim to distill it for clarity:
Opening Statement:
"Thank you for having me here today. I’ve spent over 30 years studying the assassination of President Kennedy, starting with my film JFK. These new documents, released under President Trump’s order, are a step forward, but they still leave gaps that demand answers."
On the Warren Commission:
"The Warren Commission failed miserably. It was a rush to judgment, designed to close the case rather than uncover the truth. I ask this committee to revisit what they could not—or would not—complete."
Evidence of Conspiracy:
"The records show inconsistencies—Oswald’s movements, the CIA’s surveillance of him, and withheld testimony from witnesses. The Zapruder film alone suggests a shot from the front, not just from behind as the official story claims."
Call for Reinvestigation:
"I’m not here to point fingers at individuals still alive. But I ask you, in good faith, outside all political considerations, to reinvestigate this assassination. The American people deserve the full truth, not a sanitized version."
On Government Accountability:
"For decades, agencies like the CIA have obscured facts. These files hint at their involvement—not just in Dallas, but in covering it up. Transparency isn’t enough; we need accountability."
Closing Plea:
"This isn’t about rewriting history for a movie. It’s about justice for a president who was taken from us, and for a nation misled. Please, don’t let this moment slip away—act on what these records reveal."
Additional Context
Stone’s testimony aligns with his public stance since JFK, where he portrayed the assassination as a conspiracy involving government insiders. He references the newly declassified files (part of over 6 million pages, with thousands released in March 2025 per Trump’s January executive order) but doesn’t cite specific documents in the clip, instead speaking broadly about patterns he’s observed. The hearing, chaired by Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, aims to assess the value of these records, with Stone joined by authors Jefferson Morley and James DiEugenio, who also advocate for conspiracy theories.
Notes
The video is a live feed, so Stone’s delivery is impassioned but occasionally meandering, typical of congressional testimony. I’ve streamlined it for readability.
He avoids naming living individuals as culprits, focusing instead on systemic issues and historical accountability.
No groundbreaking new evidence is presented in this segment; Stone leans on his interpretation of existing and newly unredacted material.