I was looking back over Q's posts today. I know we all took the pledge. (But I think Q knows that too)

So I started thinking that this has to be about more than us saying we take an oath.

I think this is a message to current FBI people to do the right thing. We know that many more were involved (if only on the periphery ) with what went on in DC.

We also know that FBI people in NY were involved in Weiner Laptop, and others in Arkansas were involved in Clinton Foundation investigations.

I think this is Q reminding those FBI agents of the oath they took and telling them it's time to come forward and do the right thing.

>>2286204

While everyone has been busy trying to prove R is JRKjr, has anyone thought it could be a real deep state shill. Like R=Renegade?

If so, he has come to the wrong place. He won't win any hearts and minds here.

>>2286196

>>2286734

Agreed. They offer no sauce. I complained about this earlier. Maybe a bunch of new normies that are used to tweeting but here we expect you to list your sources.

>>2286778

>>2286851

RR was in the kill box.

Mark meadows was /ourguy/ in ref to freedom Caucus.

Reread Q's post.

>>2286901

um I think Q beat you to that notable. Look above

>>2286778