If RR is dirty, Mueller must also be dirty.
If Mueller is dirty, RR must also be dirty.
Without drawing any conclusions, logically, the above two statements taken together mean that RR and Mueller are either both dirty or they are both clean. It is not logically possible that one can be dirty and the other clean.
Absolutely no other logical conclusions can be drawn at this time, based on those two statements alone.
JA is in an Ecuadoran embassy. Ecuador is in the Western Hemisphere. The US is the dominant force in the Western Hemisphere. The US could buy Ecuador and the surrounding countries if it wanted to. Ecuador can be controlled just by offering them the smallest of carrots to the US, but a huge benefit to Ecuador.
POTUS can easily prevent Ecuador from releasing JA if he wants to. JA is only going to be "evicted" with POTUS approval.
>>2287979 Yes. XNOR Both dirty or both clean.
Q finally named names directly. That's the real news in the latest drop.
Another unknown. I think that by watching Brexit, we can tell when the UK has been freed. RIght now, I'd say the UK is still Deep State/Cabal territory.
Watch Brexit. Note the Juncker collapse/agreement just now. That's huge news, and getting way too little play here in 8ch.
>they're both dirty
Opinion. That is not in evidence at this time. Q's statement means only that both are clean or both are dirty.
and nothing else
Opinion. Not in evidence at this time. Re-read the post you linked to. Logically, they are both dirty or both clean. Your statement is your opinion only. "Least Likely…" You need to review Sherlock Holmes' quote that begins:
"Once you eliminate the impossible…"