BOOM: Julie Kelly Catches Radical Pro-Illegal Alien Obama Judge in a Big Setup Against Trump After Uncovering a Bombshell Revelation in Court Transcript
On Saturday, conservative journalist and warrior for justice Julie Kelly uncovered a bombshell in the transcript from Thursday’s hearing in a radical District judge’s courtroom regarding whether the Trump Administration has the authority under the Alien Enemies Act to deport violent illegal aliens.
As Jim Hoft previously reported, Judge James Boasberg, who is running a coup-d-etat of the executive branch, is considering holding Trump officials in contempt for not turning planes around mid-flight and returning over one hundred killers, gangsters, r*pists, and other criminal illegals back to the US.
Judge Boasberg, an Obama appointee, implemented a temporary restraining order (TRO) on Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act to deport criminal aliens last month, calling it, “incredibly troublesome and problematic.” He then extended his block last week, arguing the plaintiffs suing the Trump administration need more time to file motions and prepare arguments.
Kelly predicted back in March that Boasberg was attempting to set a contempt trap for Trump officials. Now, she has proof that Boasberg slyly positioned himself to get assigned to this immigration case so he could implement his sinister scheme.
“I have just received the (purchased) transcript from Thursday’s hearing before Judge Boasberg,” Kelly wrote on X. “Lots of good stuff, especially as I develop a fuller timeline of what went down behind the scenes on March 15.”
If You've Considered Rebalancing Your Portfolio With Gold, This Faith-Driven Company Can Help
Then Kelly pointed out something incredibly damning.
“This really caught my eye,” she noted. “Remember the whole “THESE CASES ARE RANDOMLY ASSIGNED” bit by Boasberg and others?”
“No one really believes this…right?” Kelly added. “Also, during the start of the 5 p.m. Zoom hearing on March 15, Boasberg apologized for his casual dress, saying he had gone “away” for the weekend and did not bring a tie or his robe.”
“He knew this case was coming. He wanted this case,” Kelly wrote. “He wanted to stop the deportations and most importantly–he wanted to set a contempt trap for the Trump administration.”
As PJ Media notes, Boasberg’s true goal was usurping control over Trump’s legal authority on the matter of immigration and foreign policy. Boasberg was furious that the Trump administration decided to enforce the Alien Enemies Act to carry out deportations of illegal alien r*pists, murders, and gang members without his consent.
“This is not judicial restraint or a careful balance of powers,” Kelly said. “This is Boasberg giving away the notion that the executive branch should WAIT FOR APPROVAL from the judicial branch before taking action on matters clearly under the purview of the presidency, including foreign policy and diplomacy.”
“Boasberg knew throughout the day that ICE was rounding up the TdA gang bangers covered by the proclamation,” she added. “So he rushed not only to convert the initial lawsuit into a class but entered a second temporary restraining order prohibiting their removal and absurdly demanding the return of planes carrying the illegals.”
Kelly also uncovered a particularly troubling exchange involving Boasberg and one of DOJ’s lawyers. The ‘judge’ demanded answers from a DOJ attorney regarding which Trump officials were listening to his 5 p.m. hearing as if that is any of his business.
One set of exchanges during Thursday’s hearing I believed was way out of line for Boasberg was his interrogation of DOJ atty Drew Ensign over which Trump officials were listening to the 5pm hearing on March 15.
On what basis can he demand those answers? pic.twitter.com/8wrNN766Y0
— Julie Kelly (@julie_kelly2) April 5, 2025
The Gateway Pundit previously reported Boasberg has so far been assigned to FOUR cases concerning the Trump Administration.
Federal district courts usually assign cases to judges through a random selection process to ensure impartiality and prevent “judge shopping,” where litigants might attempt to have their cases heard by a particular judge perceived as favorable. According to the Federal Bar Association, this practice is designed to uphold the integrity and fairness of the judicial system.
Now, we all know he has been scheming to position himself on one case. It’s likely he has done so for the other three as well.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/boom-julie-kelly-catches-radical-pro-illegal-alien/