On February 17, 2025 at around 9pm at night, a disabled senior citizen named Danny Winklman was riding his bicycle through a neighborhood in St. Augustine, Florida. He had a run of bad luck. He had been hospitalized with serious medical issues, and as a result was evicted, leaving him homeless. All he wanted was a meal, and he was on his way home to fix himself something to eat. But a local St. Johns County Sheriff's Deputy saw that his bicycle was not equipped with lights. Within seconds, the officer would slam the elderly man to the asphalt for "not listening".

Yay Land of the Free!!!

>>22880895

>>22880916

>will allow

Uh huh.

>>22880925

No contradictions, just a limited mind and assumptions on your part.

>>22880939

Always projecting. Read it again, does it say he was homeless THAT night? Or is it possible he had just been homeless and found a place to stay?

Like I said, limited mind and assumptions on your part. Stop projecting.

>>22880946

Yep, but instead he had to be assaulted right after getting out of the hospital and locked up because he "wouldn't listen".

Yay liberty!!!

>>22880957

>plenty of law abiding ones also

Where? The Supreme Court unlawfully ruled they could violate the constitution and they did. The court is one of three branches of government, they CAN'T overrule the constitution.

Every cop that enforces gun control is a criminal for instance. They have ALL violated the actual law they swore an oath to.

>>22880964

Did I say it doesn't? There's you assuming again. The homeless situation is made clear, but you won't bother to watch it, just blindly accuse and lick boots.

>>22880978

So? Has that sheriff or his deputies enforced no open carry, no concealed wit5a permit, civil asset forfeiture…. I can go on.

If a murderer buys 10 starving kids a meal and then murdered the waitress is it ok because he bought the kids a meal?

>>22880981

Sorry Truth is old

>>22880998

Sorry for typos site keeps freezing and it screws me up, I didn't notice before hitting reply.

>>22881003

>difference between Law and Order vs. Authority Dysphoria

When law enforcement are themselves lawless, there is no law and order.

>>22881015

Even if they get a call they usually don't have the authority most think they do. Many think a call is all they need rather than RAS.

>>22881019

Which is exactly why BLM and Antifa are controlled opposition so you can attach people speaking out about government lawlessness with them.

Nice try.

>>22881034

All you can do is attack the messenger because you can't stand against the message.

>>22881038

Yeah it's mind boggling. Some literally worship perceived authority.

>>22881048

Sue the cops, right. While the court unlawfully legislated the nonsense that is "qualified immunity" which violates equal protection under the law, and means We the People, through taxes, pay cops victims. Great system they setup for themselves huh?

>>22881060

Are you literally retarded? I just said you're trying to attach me to them and you immediately did it again. BLM and Antifa are leftist and controlled opposition, I am not. I'm just someone really pissed off at our laws and constitution being violated every day and people being abused by the very people who swore to protect them.

>>22881077

You don't get it, it never makes it to a jury. The court wont allow you to sue the cops because they have "qualified immunity" unless there is VERY specific case law where an officer was found to have violated rights in VERY similar circumstances. I have even seen them argue asking for the prior case law that says they can't physically block someone from exiting a vehicle and then arrest them for refusing to exit. They're THAT stupid.

>>22881096

Always projecting nonsense on those who speak out about cops.

>>22881112

Youtube has many videos of people being arrested or kicked out of town meetings.

>>22881129

Meant for >>22881027

>>22881232

People get arrested for that too. Seriously you need to get out of your bubble.

>>22881243

This is the great awakening isn't it? Wake up!

>>22881286

Who's panicking?

>>22881188

>>22881301

Can you define a woman?

What's bound on earth is bound in heaven.

>>22881304

I'm coming here telling the Truth that LE in this country are domestic enemies and our country must confess her sins and admit that LE followed the USSC off a cliff and violated the constitution.

>>22881319

As Q once said,

>Think MULTIPLE MEANINGS

>>22881279

>What trouble are (You) in?

See, ALWAYS projecting wrongdoing against those who speak up against cops wrongdoing.

>>22881330

KMAO, I guess we'll see huh?

>>22881356

I'm not overgeneralizing, literally ALL LE have violated the constitution in this country, and our country must admit it.

>>22881380

Ok. Every cop who thought the court, which is from one of three branches of government, got to "rule" that they can violate the limits We the People places on government violated our constitution, which is ABOVE the court.

Our 2nd amendment for example was written so it CAN'T be overturned, even by congress. Doing so would itself be a violation of the constitution. Yet the lawless court said cops could violate it and they do. The same with many others. Civil asset forfeiture and the 4th for example.

>>22881380

>>22881398

Refresh yourself on the 4th amendment, then tell me how every cop, prosecutor, and judge who participates in civil asset forfeiture is not guilty of deprivation of rights under color of law and conspiracy against rights?

>4th Amendment

>The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

>>22881380

>>22881398

>>22881418

Please do me a favor and explain how this ISN'T a violation of the 4th amendment?

>>22881431

They've been violating it long before that happened as controlled opposition so you could repeat that like you constantly do since it's your only defense.

>>22881442

No it's opposite of the Truth. It's literally your go to because you can never actually defend their lawlessness. Tell me how civil asset forfeiture isn't a 4th amendment violation please.

>>22881455

There was corruption long before that. That was controlled opp.

>>22881466

too busy worshipping LE.

>>22881489

>>22881577

Good people admit when they've done wrong and are sorry for it. Some have convinced themselves they're heros and will hurt those who disagree.

>>22881595

It happens a lot, and the so called "good" cops turn a blind eye.

>>22881590

>"Gag Order" is a violation of the First Amendment

Exactly. The courts don't have that authority, they are below our rights.