>Chambers, a 58-year-old Oklahoma native with a doctorate in political science from Northern Illinois University
>He's probably a communist anyways.
Agreed.
Even okies can be commie tards.
Most of them are red AF, tho.
Pig gets the insta-filter, too.
Not for his memes, but for the endless arguments with pig-haters.
ID+, and all of that shit disappears.
He's right, you know.
Voters used to have to prove they were male land-owners at a minimum.
Apply the same test to voting rights that SCOTUS found was necessary for 2A.
Hegseth press breifing on Panama Canal
US is building up forces in the region.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=syURHZKxGik
>Great Speech Pete:
Anon enjoyed Karoline's speech today/yesterday.
Finally showed some cleavage.
Come on warm summer temps!
>America is a nanny state where you are a child and cant make you're own choices without a license.
You have a right to travel, but need a licence to drive a motor vehicle.
Yet, it's illegal to drive your horse and buggy down the side of an interstate highway.
Give that a bit of thought.
>Hope China does the right thing.
When has Chyna ever done the "right" thing?
Trump will bend them over sideways and make them pay us because he's an innovative thinker while they can only make monkey copies.
You forget the areas of the country where interstates were built over back roads.
If the government leaves no viable alternatives, travel is still a right.
In addition, the "right to travel" should be subject to the same standards as the "right to bear arms".
Modern innovations have no bearing on the original intent of the founders.
Ignores the premise of constitutional right to travel, and focuses on license to drive.
>while cruising speed is 85mph
That's kinda the point.
The state can't establish a minimum speed limit while limiting citizens' right to travel without a license.
Think critically, newfag.
What does a God given RIGHT mean, rather than a privilege subject to the whim of some bureaucrat?
>It is my Right to try my buggy on the Interstate, but that doesn't mean it's wise.
It's not the state's right to give an Interstate an unsafe speed limit while limiting you to a buggy.
That would be similar to requiring a license/registration/annual taxes for an AR, while saying you can get around it by only having a flintlock.
>stfu
>you cop hating cunt
filtured for stupidy
let's test that and see if there's a reply
Not hating on cops at all.
Just supporting a consitutional right to travel without special permission from the state.
>might be a better way to 'grok' the subject)
Anon is old enough to remember when the government told us paper bags were destroying forests, and plastic bags were saving the planet.
Now you can't even get a damn grocery bag without paying a tax in some states.
There needs to be give and take, and a LOT of that needs to be states giving up their privilege of fucking with citizens' right to travel.
Someone anon knows loves to go out and troll the local sheriffs deputies by driving a three color BMW. They'll pull it over for any excuse they can think up (like you touched the fog line) while anon speeds by at 20 over the speed limit in a "respectable car".
Anon's point is that driving should be a basic human right, but to achieve that we'll probably need to weed out all the sub-humans.
Is a 13 year old in a 750hp dodge demon any moar dangerous than a meth'd up mexican trucker in a 75,000# rig?
Patrols are primarily for tax collection, with safety being the justification. That's why the always hang out in the double penalty zones.
Anon is in the "If you hurt someone, you're responsible" camp.
If someone in a car capable of doing 150 in a SAFE manner wants to go twice as fast as everyone else, they should be able to do so.
Likewise, if some piece of shit without brakes is hitting people at 30mph, they should be held accountable.
It's the arbitrary rules that rile anon.
TFW you can't even tell them to do a flip because all these fags die from the suddenlies.