Anonymous ID: c31af8 July 25, 2018, 7:29 p.m. No.2290300   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2290186

>Connection between Imran Awan and Obama via Rahm Emanuel

OK, I've been looking for this. I know anons have posted that Awan was brought into the fold by NoName. However, I kept thinking there was more to it than just that. Rahm Emanuel has a lot more to do with this that I think we all have figured out. Then again, look at Q's posts today re: NoName.

 

The issue we have is one of logistics of the prosecutorial role that Huber's 470 can play in this. In conversation many threads ago, a few of us were discussing how DoJ and MI/UCMJ could coordinate. The EO from Trump seemed to pave the way for that.

 

Long/Short of what I'm getting at is this:

  1. Awan plea deal isn't covered by Huber's efforts.

  2. NoName is tied to UK spying and fake Russian dossier

  3. Awan is tied to the methods this was procured using proprietary (illegal) servers

  4. Grounds for treasonous charges against either NoName, Awan, or anyone "aiding and providing comfort"

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2381

 

Now, here's the conundrum:

Ex Parte Milligan. HOW is Q's plan going to get around this? If the server was over seas, no longer are they all considered "civies". They would be considered "Enemy Combatants". This would include natural born citizens that helped in this entire operation.

 

This is my best guess. I'm not a lawfag, but I think this is open close. Given the EO to give liberties to investigators to work with UCMJ, we got ourselves gallows. The slow walk is to get the public on board with executions of traitors. The execution of traitors needs to happen to send a signal, loud and clear, to would-be perps that want to try to pull this shit again.

 

I mean, sounds like a great movie script. Is this where we're headed?

Anonymous ID: c31af8 July 25, 2018, 7:47 p.m. No.2290523   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0637

>>2290403

People have a tendency to gravitate to what they feel most comfortable with. How do you think we keep getting redheads with blue eyes? Might just be that they find other redheads most attractive.

 

Those that choose their own path do so at their own lack of understanding of genetic distance; or, for that matter, genetic similarity. To the contrary, nations like Iceland, for example, work diligently to ensure genetic compatibility while eliminating genetic defects due to likeness/distance.

 

You should read more, and concern yourself less with folks that choose to put their offspring in danger due to disfigured concepts of attraction. You might even learn something useful. The harder you divisionfags try to keep blacks/whites from breeding, the worse your case looks - not that there isn't actual science to back it; it's just that your emotional argument is flawed.

 

In the meantime, people with brains go on to proliferate with compatible mate-parings:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/when-incest-is-best-kissi/

 

Stop the hate. It's not helping you.

Anonymous ID: c31af8 July 25, 2018, 7:52 p.m. No.2290583   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0727

>>2290308

#Blacklistanon posted that Leonard raped Sarah Michelle Gellar in her youth.

 

I've not looked at Spock the same since. I say that, and I'm a veritable fan (was).

Anonymous ID: c31af8 July 25, 2018, 8:06 p.m. No.2290773   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2290637

>>2290751

I'll put it to you this way, divisionfag:

Married a redhead. Had a redhead with sky blue eyes and pasty white skin. Had another kid with all the markers, redhead highlights, and hazel/green eyes.

 

When they grow up, they'll do the same. And so will their kids; etc, etc.