>>2291077
Sure. So, the clock involves moving forward in time, by the day, around it, clockwise. That’s about as far as we’ve gotten with solving how to move it. When the clock hand points to today’s date, the other days in line with today, and the dates lined up directly behind it, all have shown interesting correlations. Future proving past stuff, markers lining up, etc. So there’s a pattern we’ve identified doing that.
Now, we really have no clue what we’re doing yet but we have clues.
One thing we’ve noticed is that [boxes] references another post with the word “boxes” in it. This seems particularly true if the letters that aren’t in the box are capitalized.
Also, [20] boxes with numbers in them we have learned point to timestamps, or positions on the clock.
So, what I’m adding new to the equations here is that I think when Q says “castle lock” or other instructions with “castle” in it, it references a clock hand. And I’m also saying that there are at least two hands, and they run in different directions.
Now, if you reference the Q posts I posted last post, you will see that it sounds like Q is telling us to hold the castle and to prepare for silence. On the clock, that’s the date Q stopped posting for this streak he was just on. So I’m saying the hand that went clockwise should have stopped there and started when Q posted again, or maybe didn’t start at all and a different hand did.
Last thing of general notability, to add to my theory, is when Q came back he referenced [20] and [2] very early, and the time stamp for the post I’m claiming should have stopped the clock is 2:20.
Hopefully I kept you along for that.