I think you are spot on with the FB analysis being CIA backed. I also am 100% certain word got out, and that's why it tanked. Strings cut.
Thank you, Haspel, and Kansas! Also thank you, femanon. I'll just imagine what they look like.
IBOR can have some far reaching ramifications for online entities wishing to not have certain views expressed on their mediums.
HAVING SAID THAT
If Facebook and Twitter are government funded through their public stocks, then they should be treated as utilities instead of illegal private companies. Just sayin; IBOR extended to every online presence isn't necessarily appropriate if you take the context of the Bill of Rights literally.
Just think about what you wish for. I'm certain Q means it appropriately, I'm just uncertain about some groups of anons and their intent. Intent and context needs to be discussed/debated.
>>2291523
Dude…
YOU DO REALIZE WHERE THESE SERVERS ARE HOSTED
Right? RIGHT??
Do you not understand what you are actually doing right now?
Oh; did NOT know that. I like that better than Kate Spade reference.
Well, My thinking was Kate Spade being connected to the trafficking. She hung herself. On a doorknob. Like, my thinking is:
-
PS shows up, asks someone for a coke.
-
Trump staffer or someone in the know has one ready to give him. With that name on it. On purpose.
Pompeo, on the other hand, would have specifically looked for that name to advertise who they are taking down. Why in that setting? Perhaps to advertise to some knowing senators in the room, or people watching.
Another anon mentioned Kate Brown in Oregon. The ranchers that were fighting over the right to let their cattle graze there may have had their standoff to fight off gov't hacks because they knew the land grab was over something else.
I like that angle better, actually. We know Harry Reid sold off Nevada to China. All sorts of shady shit.