Pastor Calls Cop Tyrant, Cop Chases Pastor Into Church & Tazes Him - DOJ Investigation | Findings Released
I guess he wanted to prove the pastor right.
Pastor Calls Cop Tyrant, Cop Chases Pastor Into Church & Tazes Him - DOJ Investigation | Findings Released
I guess he wanted to prove the pastor right.
Hey if the waters stand for people (rev 17:15) then what does the ark stand for? Also what does it means that Ham saw Noah Naked and "walked backwards" to cover him with a blanket?
>The bed is too short to stretch out on, the blanket too narrow to wrap around you
>Trump is wrong for not bringing this Maryland man home
Which is why Trump will be arrested for deprivation of rights under color of law.
What do you think get's the snowball rolling on the domestic enemies?
>the supreme court DOES NOT issue not-guilty/guilty verdicts, you asshat
Either does the President, but the President does have to obey the Constitution and not deprive rights under color of law.
Keyword CHARGED
>Terror organizations
Oh I see, so if government calls you a terrorist fuck the constitution, got it.
What was he found guilty of in a court of law?
>Sorry asshole that is how it works.
Who told you that and why did you believe them? Enjoy the show!
KMAO. Who told you that supersedes the 14th amendment? Why did you believe it, just because it kept being repeated? Jesus you idiots are dumb.
Trump is purposely violating the law constitutionโฆ.KNOWINGLY
*law & constitution
Oh yes they absolutely do. The 14th amendments due process clause ABSOLUTELY applies to illegal immigrants, and Trump knows it.
He's told you morans and you still can't see it.
Yes I know He is, which is why he will be arrested for deprivation of rights under color of law.
LE all over the country have been blatantly violating rights.Enough is enough.
Wrong. The 14th due process clause applies to EVERYONE.
>nor shall any State deprive any PERSON of life, liberty, or property without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws
You're really dull kek. NONE of that supersedes the 14th amendment's due process clause.
Wrong again.
So is deprivation of rights under color of law.
Read the 14th again. It doesn't say citizen, it says PERSON. It was ALWAYS intended to include all persons, as they had the principle of "treat the foreigner as yourself". Even illegals have the right to due process under the US Constitution.
Trump knows that, that's why he's doing it.
What you said is factually wrong kek
Notice due process doesn't just apply to citizens. Even the president MUST afford illegal aliens and terrorists in the US due process under the US Constitution.
Absolutely wrong. Read the 14th again.
NoPERSON
Not citizen.PERSON
Did you idiots sleep through your civics class?
This is as much my land as anyone. I was born here, my parents were born here, my grandparents were born here, etc. Unlike you, I actually care to learn the law rather than believe what I want to believe.
Not irrelevant at all, you just haven't learned the comms.
You seem to have a major problem with reading comprehension domestic enemy.
Just wait for that arrestโฆ
What happens when the government changes their mind?
kek For how long?
Actually it was me earlier, that's another anon. We're multiplying kek
Wrong. Illegal aliens are still subject to the jurisdiction, it's diplomats that are not.
You mean pushing the Truth. We're simply shining a light on LE behavior.
>We all know that there are bad apples in every bunch, but does that make them all rotten?
Funny you guys always ignore the part of that saying where the bad apples actually cause the others to spoil, they don't just make the rest look spoiled. At this point, the orchard that is LE is rotten and on fire, while "Baghdad Bob" types are standing in front swearing there's nothing to see here.
>>Defund and dismantle the police.
>>Lock them all up in prison.
>>No More Police In America!
When did I say any of that? Why are you always projecting nonsense?
You replied to yourself anon.
Why would I do that? This is Q research isn't it?
Wrong! Read it again. Every PERSON. The original intent was every living person, not only citizens.
Nice I didn't even notice.
Reading comprehension isn't your thing is it? We're talking about due process.
This part "No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger" is seperate from this part "nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."
No living person in the United States may be lawfully denied due process, as was the original intent.
As much as I dislike Chuck he's right. EveryPersonis guaranteed due process in our constitution.
If we don't stand up for it when our side violates it how can we complain when theirs does?
>Channeled Message