Anonymous ID: d50bce April 14, 2025, 10:36 p.m. No.22913347   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3349 >>3410 >>4174 >>4228

Athens is burning after petrol bomb riots see attacks on police - before 70 are arrested

 

Athens has been ravaged by flames after rioters threw petrol bombs during a clash with police officers before 70 demonstrators were arrested.

 

Shocking footage emerging from the holiday hotspot showed rioters storming the streets just after midnight as the rowdy mobs came head-to-head with cops.

 

Around 50 people launched petrol bombs and fireworks at police officers outside a station in Exarchia and some 21 cars were left wrecked after being torched in the chaos.

 

Properties, local shops, and motorbikes were also set alight by protestors as terrified locals watched on in horror.

 

Over 70 arrests were made during the riot which lasted several hours, Greek broadcaster EPTNews reported Sunday, citing security sources.

 

'Incidents occurred on Saturday night in Exarchia where unknown persons attacked police forces,' Greek authorities said.

 

'According to ELAS, the incidents began shortly before midnight when groups of unknown persons attacked police forces at the intersection of Kallidromiou and E. Benaki streets with Molotov cocktails and stones, with the police responding by using chemical weapons.'

 

The riots erupted after a bomb planted near the offices of Hellenic Train - Greece's main railway company - exploded on Friday night in central Athens.

 

Anonymous calls warning of the attack were made to Greek media just moments before the blast. An unknown man is said to have warned that the bomb, placed inside a backpack, would explode in '30 to 40 minutes' and said that 'it is not a prank', The Sun reported at the time.

 

In a statement, Hellenic Train said the explosion had occurred 'very close to its central offices' and said the blast had caused limited damage and no injuries to any employees or passers-by.

 

Police cordoned off the site along a major avenue in the Greek capital, keeping residents and tourists away from the building in an area with several bars and restaurants.

 

Officers at the scene said a bag containing an explosive device had been placed near the Hellenic Train building on Syngrou Avenue.

 

The drama unfolded amid widespread public anger over a February 2023 railway disaster which saw 57 people killed, most of them young students, and dozens more seriously injured when a freight train and a passenger train heading in opposite directions were accidentally put on the same track.

 

Thousands have now turned out to strike and protest in Greece and abroad since the second anniversary of the collision.

 

It also brought about two votes of no confidence last year and again in March that the conservative government overcame.

 

The train's Italian-owned operator Hellenic Train has denied knowledge of any illegal cargo on the freight train.

 

More than 40 people have been prosecuted, including the local station master responsible for routing the trains.

 

A trial into the accident is not expected before the end of the year.

 

Earlier on Friday, the parliament voted to refer a former junior minister to justice on possible misdemeanour charges for breach of duty in connection to the aftermath of the accident.

 

Opposition parties say Christos Triantopoulos, who was dispatched by Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis to the scene after the accident, authorised the bulldozing of the crash site which led to the loss of vital evidence.

 

Triantopoulos denies any wrongdoing and says he was overseeing relief efforts.

 

Greece's intercity trains went under private management in 2017, when state-owned Greek rail traffic services operator TrainOSE was privatised and sold to Italy's Ferrovie dello Stato Italiane, becoming Hellenic Train.

 

Greek state company OSE still owns the tracks.

 

Hellenic Train's former CEO Maurizio Capotorto was reportedly summoned to testify before a magistrate, on suspicion of giving false testimony to a parliamentary committee into the disaster in January 2024.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14604663/athens-burning-petrol-bomb-riots-police-arrest.html

Anonymous ID: d50bce April 14, 2025, 10:36 p.m. No.22913351   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3356 >>3410 >>4174 >>4228

Fox News has highest ratings in cable news history in Q1

 

Here is TVNewser’s recap of the cable news ratings for the first quarter of 2025.

 

It has been an start to the new year on multiple fronts. Former President Joe Biden handed the Oval Office back to President Donald Trump in January. Since then, the new administration and Elon Musk’s DOGE group have been regularly making headlines as they’ve sought to reshape the scope of the federal government.

 

Also in January, massive wildfires swept through the Los Angeles area, wrecking communities and claiming lives. Two airplane tragedies in Washington, D.C. and Philadelphia put the aviation industry in the spotlight. And then in March, the Trump administration experienced its first major political scandal when defense secretary Pete Hegseth was involved in leaking war plans to the editor in chief of The Atlantic.

 

Fox News remained the top cable news network, and enjoyed its highest-rated quarter in cable news history. In addition to topping its cable rivals, FNC also surpassed ABC and NBC during weekday primetime.

 

Fox News also secured its highest quarter cable news share ever with 65% of the audience in total day and 66% in primetime. It was the only one of the three cable outlets to see its performance improve versus the same quarter in 2024 across the board.

 

There were also programming changes made during this quarter amongst all the outlets. Fox News introduced The Will Cain Show at 4 p.m. ET and rejigged its weekend primetime lineup. MSNBC revamped most of its its weekday and weekend lineup, which led to the depature of Joy Reid at 7 p.m. ET. Finally CNN reworked its weekday lineup resulting in a new 4 p.m. show from Kasie Hunt, as well as Jake Tapper bordering primetime and Wolf Blitzer moving to the midmorning timeslot of 10 a.m. ET.

 

Fox News Channel

 

Fox News averaged 3.012 million total primetime viewers and 380,000 Adults 25-54 viewers in Q1 2025. During total day, Fox News had 1.919 million total viewers, and 247,000 demo viewers.

 

Looking at its performance compared to the same quarter in 2024, FNC was up +46% in total viewers and +63% in the demo during primetime. In total day, the network was up a respective +48% and +58% in those measured categories.

 

According to Nielsen Media Research, Fox News’ rule at the top of cable news has now stretched to 93 consecutive quarters.

 

Fox News was the most-watched cable network during primetime in total viewers and the second most-watched network in the demo and repeated those positions during total day.

 

MSNBC

 

In primetime, MSNBC averaged 1.024 million total viewers and 96,000 demo viewers. During total day, MSBNC had 593,000 total viewers and 57,000 A25-54 viewers.

 

Relative to Q1 2024, the network was down -18% in total viewers and -21% in the demo during primetime. MSNBC dropped a respective -27% and -30% in those measured categories during total day.

 

Despite the downward trend, MSNBC has seen an uptick since January. Between Jan. 20 through March 28 the network’s primetime lineup has been averaging 1.45 million total viewers, up +96% compared the post-election to pre-inauguration period, when it averaged 739,000 viewers between Nov. 11, 2024 and Jan. 19, 2025.

 

During total day, MSNBC has averaged 830,000 total viewers between Jan. 20 to March 28, up +43% in viewership when using the same date ranges.

 

MSNBC was the third most-watched cable network in total viewers and No. 19 in the demo. During total day, MSNBC landed in third place in total viewers and 12th in the demo.

 

CNN

 

CNN averaged 558,000 total viewers and 121,000 demo viewers during primetime. Across total day, the network saw 428,000 total viewers, and 79,000 A25-54 viewers.

 

Compared to Q1 2024, CNN was down -6% in total viewers and -1% in the demo during primetime. In total day, it declined a respective -8% and -7% in those measured categories.

 

CNN remained the second most-watched cable news network in the demo during primetime and total day. It’s the sixth straight quarter the network has finished in that position. Q1 highlights include CNN NewsNight with Abby Phillip‘s ascension, as it is now the network’s most-watched program in the demo.

 

CNN finished in eighth place in primetime with total viewers and ninth in the demo. During total day, CNN was No. 4 in total viewers and No. 7 in the demo.

 

PROGRAMMING

 

Fox News — The Five (4.552 million viewers at 5 p.m. ET) was the most-watched program in total viewers. Jesse Watters Primetime (507,000 viewers at 8 p.m. ET) led in the demo.

MSNBC — The Rachel Maddow Show (1.918 million viewers at 9 p.m. ET) was the network’s most-watched program in total viewers. It also finished first in the demo with 177,000 A25-54 viewers.

CNN — The Lead with Jake Tapper (662,000 viewers at 5 p.m. ET) was the most-watched program in total viewers. Anderson Cooper 360 (135,000 viewers at 8 p.m. ET) claimed that spot in the demo.

Newsmax — Rob Schmitt Tonight (510,000 viewers) was the top show in total viewers, and tied with Finnerty in the demo at 43,000 viewers apiece.

NewsNation — Cuomo was the top show in both measured categories with 177,000 total viewers and 21,000 A25-54 viewers. Notable: NewsNation is up in total day and primetime total viewers in Q1 2025 versus Q1 2024. The network now ranks higher than Fox Business and CNBC, finishing in 48th place in total viewers and 65th in the demo.

Fox Business — Kudlow remains the top show in both measured categories with 326,000 total viewers and 17,000 A25-54 viewers. This was its 13th consecutive quarter as the top business program. Fox Business also had four of the Top 10 business programs with total viewers.

CNBC — Fast Money Halftime Report was the top show in both measured categories with 240,000 total viewers and 62,000 A25-54 viewers.

Q1 2025’s Top 15 Shows Among Total Viewers

 

The Five — Fox News (4,552,000)

Jesse Watters Primetime — Fox News (4,103,000)

Hannity — Fox News (3,544,000)

Special Report with Bret Baier — Fox News (3,503,000)

The Ingraham Angle — Fox News (3,418,000)

Gutfeld! — Fox News (3,333,000)

The Will Cain Show — Fox News (2,591,000)

Outnumbered — Fox News (2,453,000)

The Faulkner Focus — Fox News (2,392,000)

America Reports — Fox News (2,351,000)

The Story with Martha MacCallum — Fox News (2,338,00)

America’s Newsroom — Fox News (2,285,000)

The Rachel Maddow Show — MSNBC (1,981,000)

Fox News at Night — Fox News (1,907,000)

Fox & Friends — Fox (1,519,000)

Q1 2025’s Top 15 Among Adults 25-54

 

Jesse Watters Primetime — Fox News (507,000)

The Five — Fox News (500,000)

Hannity — Fox News (465,000)

Gutfeld! — Fox News (453,000)

The Ingraham Angle — Fox News (414,000)

Special Report with Bret Baier — Fox News (404,000)

The Will Cain Show — Fox News (312,000)

Fox News at Night — Fox News (302,000)

Outnumbered — Fox News (284,000)

The Faulkner Focus — Fox News (281,000)

America Reports — Fox News (280,000)

The Story — Fox News (266,000)

America’s Newsroom — Fox News (260,000)

Fox & Friends — Fox (198,000)

The Rachel Maddow Show — MSNBC (177,000)

 

https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/first-quarter-2025-cable-news-ratings/

Anonymous ID: d50bce April 14, 2025, 10:37 p.m. No.22913354   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3410 >>4101 >>4109 >>4174 >>4228

Florida woman accused of selling human bones on Facebook - with some as low as $35

 

A Florida woman is accused of selling and buying human bones - including some for as low as $35 - and now a criminal charge.

 

Kymberlee Schopper, 52, was charged with trading in human tissue, according to Fox 35.

 

Police in Orange City, Florida, say Schopper bought and offered human bones for sale on Facebook marketplace. Authorities received a report on December 21, 2023, about a business selling remains through its social media account.

 

The business was identified as “Wicked Wonderland” and is located in Orange City.

 

Investigators say they found human remains for sale on the site, including two segments of a skull for $90, a clavicle and scapula for $90, a rib for $35, a vertebrae for $35 and a partial human skull for $600, according to the report.

 

Officers went to the store and one of the owners said they were not aware that it was illegal to sell human remains.

 

"She confirmed that the store had multiple human bone fragments, all purchased from private sellers, and mentioned she has documentation for these transactions but could not provide it at that moment," an arrest affidavit obtained by Fox 34 detailed. "She described the bones as genuine human remains and delicate in nature."

 

Police say some of the bones found were likely archaeological finds. One was more than 100 years old, and another was more than 500 years old.

 

Schopper was arrested and released Friday from jail on $7,500 bond.

 

https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/crime/florida-woman-human-bones-sold-arrest-b2732246.html

Anonymous ID: d50bce April 14, 2025, 10:39 p.m. No.22913359   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3362 >>3364 >>3410 >>3490 >>4174 >>4228

Here’s what potential 23andMe buyers could do with your genetic data

 

Late last month, genetic testing giant 23andMe filed for bankruptcy.

 

The San Francisco-based company — cofounded in 2006 by former healthcare investor Anne Wojcicki — rose to fame for offering genetic testing services directly to customers.

 

When the company went public in 2021, it was valued at just over $6 billion. Now, it says it had debts of $2.3 billion, about $126 million in cash and cash equivalents, and needs additional liquidity.

 

The company’s descent into financial uncertainty wasn’t sudden.

 

23andMe had struggled with its business model, failing to turn a profit almost two decades after it began selling direct-to-consumer DNA test kits. Demand for its premiere product — a one-time test — began waning around 2019, and its effort to provide more consumer value through additional services wasn’t enough to close the gap.

 

Then, in October 2023, hackers accessed the personal details of some users in a data breach that cost the company $30 million in a later settlement agreement. The breach also made potential new customers nervous about the security of their data and more resistant to purchasing kits.

 

The company’s announcement that it was filing for bankruptcy and seeking buyers has now further raised concerns among consumers about the security of 23andMe’s database, one of the largest consumer DNA databases in the world.

 

Cybersecurity experts have urged users to delete their data, pointing to a host of risks: Genetic data can be used to further discrimination, enable financial fraud, and develop biological weapons, they say.

 

23andMe has said it will continue operating until a buyer is found. A race to acquire the company — and its data — has begun.

 

Here’s everything you need to know about the sale and what might happen to your DNA data.

 

What genetic data does 23andMe even collect?

23andMe gathers genetic data using saliva samples. Consumers receive a collection kit and submit about 2 milliliters of saliva. Each kit has a collection tube labeled with a 14-digit barcode.

 

“After the sample passes visual inspection, the barcode — which is the only identifying information shared with the laboratory — is scanned and the sample moves to DNA extraction,” 23andMe spokesperson Ann Sommerlath told BI by email. “Once a sample is successfully genotyped, the laboratory sends the resulting data back to 23andMe along with the accompanying barcode, at which point we can begin interpreting your data.”

 

Genotyping is the process identifying variations in someone’s genetic code. These variations influence a person’s physical traits, their development, and susceptibility to disease.

 

How does the company handle its genetic data?

Aside from sharing individual genetic reports with customers, if they opt-in, 23andMe says it uses anonymized genetic and self-reported information for research.

 

“When customers agree to participate in 23andMe Research via our consent document, they give 23andMe permission to share their de-identified, individual-level data with approved, qualified research collaborators outside of 23andMe,” Sommerlath told BI. “De-identification (replacing personal information with a random ID) enables researchers to protect the identity of individuals.”

 

23andMe shares some of the resulting research in its blog. In a piece from November 2024, for example, the company wrote that many of its users are descendants of Mayflower passengers.

 

23andMe was found to offer the “clearest privacy policy” in a review of 10 popular genetic testing services — including Ancestry, Toolbox Genomics, and Everlywell — that was conducted by the data privacy service Icogni.

 

Does a 23andMe buyer have to comply with its privacy policy?

Yes. And then no.

 

In order to make a qualified bid, “potential buyers must, among other requirements, agree to comply with 23andMe’s consumer privacy policy and all applicable laws with respect to the treatment of customer data,” the company said in a letter posted to its website on March 26.

 

Ron Zayas, CEO of Ironwall, a privacy service offered by Incogni, told Business Insider that the letter is just a guideline and leaves several questions unanswered.

 

“For how long is the letter good for? A day after purchase, a year?” Zayas asked. “What if a company like a data broker buys the company? It may change the definition of all the terms in the letter and even the privacy statement.”

 

Benjamin Farrow, a partner at Anderson, Williams, & Farrow, said the new owner isn’t legally bound to the existing privacy policy after purchase.

 

“There is no way a court will say the terms of service can never be changed,” he told BI. “It’s like buying a car. Once you own it, you can paint it, change the interior, do anything you want with it.”

 

Thorin Klosowski, a privacy and security activist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said the security of a user’s 23andMe data will depend on who purchases the biotech company.

 

“It doesn’t take very many leaps of logic to think through some of the worst-case scenarios,” Klosowski said. “Whether that is an insurance company or a company that would grant easier access for law enforcement.”

 

Despite the bid requirements for 23andMe, Klosowski said, “We don’t really know how that’s going to play out.”

 

“We don’t know what would happen if an unscrupulous company didn’t do that. We don’t know how closely they would be monitored,” he said.

 

Who wants to buy the company?

Wojcicki, for one.

 

She said she resigned as CEO of the company “so I can be in the best position to pursue the company as an independent bidder,” in a post on X on March 24 announcing the bankruptcy.

 

A handful of other companies have also expressed interest.

 

Nucleus Genomics, founded by 25-year-old University of Pennsylvania dropout Kian Sadeghi, has explored the possibility of purchasing 23andMe. For Nucleus Genomics — a new player on the genetic testing market focused on whole genome testing — there’s some value in the data and technology of a company with a 20-year history, Sadeghi said.

 

Crypto nonprofit Sei Foundation has also expressed interest in acquiring 23andMe. “This isn’t just another bankruptcy. It’s a digital land grab on one of history’s most profoundly intimate data sets,” the Sei Foundation said in an X post on March 31. “We’re invested long-term in returning intellectual property (including your DNA) to the people. It’s the American thing to do.”

 

Pinnacle, an analytics company, is also apparently interested. In a LinkedIn post addressed to 23andMe’s shareholders, Pinnacle cofounder and CEO Ryan Sitton wrote: “We will give you $100 million for 23andMe today.”

 

How valuable is its genetic data?

There is no formula for quantifying the value of 23andMe’s data, so potential buyers and informed speculators are making educated estimates.

 

Kanyi Maqubela, managing partner of venture capital firm Kindred Ventures, which has invested in several healthcare companies, told BI that genetic data is particularly valuable for pharmaceutical research and development because it often includes early disease markers.

 

Pharmaceutical companies are typically “very data hungry, always looking for new data pipelines, and always looking to collect it at scale,” he said. So, “even partial genomic sequencing at the individual level is quite valuable.”

 

It’s even more valuable “if you’ve got metadata attached to it, so like demographic information, name,” he said. By connecting people across geographies and disease levels, health companies can start drawing correlations across the data, which makes it all the more valuable, he added.

 

Incogni’s Zayas said that 23andMe’s data “is probably worth more than the service they were selling.”

 

“If you look at the value of monetized information, a good cellphone can go for $50,” he said. “Good buyer information, good credit card information, good demographic information, you can start looking at tens or even hundreds of dollars per individual.”

 

23andMe has access to all of that and more, he said. “Just in research for insurance companies, that’s got to be worth at least a few hundred dollars per individual.”

 

The company says it has over 15 million customers, so by Zayas’ calculations the data itself is worth several billions, at least.

 

Jessica Vitak, a professor at the University of Maryland’s College of Information who researches data privacy, told BI that 23andMe’s data is “fairly unique” and “extremely revealing.”

 

“There’s a tremendous trove of not just genetic data tied to those accounts, but the majority of people who use the service also completed surveys, so there are other data points that would interest various third parties,” Vitak said. “Whether it’s advertisers, health researchers, or people selling data to a whole range of entities.”

 

Vitak said the depth of information is one reason 23andMe’s data is so valuable.

 

“It’s one thing if I decide to share information about myself, but genetic data isn’t just about me,” Vitak said. “It’s about all my direct family members, too.”

 

Sadeghi from Nucleus Genomics, however, said he is not making a bid because he thinks the data is valuable but instead because of another company 23andMe acquired.

 

23andMe only gathers “a small sliver of someone’s DNA and the most critical genetic markers are actually completely absent from the data. They’re just not there, and that’s why it actually doesn’t work for drug discovery. That’s why it never worked as a clinical test either,” he told BI. “The data is worth something, but is it worth anywhere near what people are positing today? Absolutely not.”

 

Sadeghi said the real value of 23andMe is in Lemonaid Health — the telehealth company it acquired for $400 million in 2021 — as a way to connect with customers.

 

What can the new owners do with the company — and its genetic data?

Sadeghi said he sees the data as one component of a “real-time, consumer-centric, quantified health platform” he wants to build.

 

“There’s no reason why you can’t bring together someone’s blood, genetics, drugs, urinary analysis, full body MRIs, wearables, all together in a single platform that can basically completely revolutionize disease prevention, disease diagnosis, and also disease treatment,” he said.

 

Kindred’s Maqubela said that “no one roots for a bankruptcy,” but 23andMe’s data is a “treasure trove” that he thinks could help grow the burgeoning field of multi-omics.

 

Multi-omics combines data from the genome (genes), proteome (proteins), transcriptome (RNA transcripts), epigenome (modifications to DNA), metabolome (molecules produced in metabolism), microbiome (fungi, bacteria, viruses), and more to create a more comprehensive picture of human biology.

 

“It’s a very young field, mostly stuck right now in pharma R&D, and then in some bench and lab research, and so it hasn’t yet broken into scaled provider and end patient uses, but it’s going to soon,” he said. 23andMe’s data, he added, could accelerate the development of mult-omics.

 

Maqubela said the recent advances in AI also present new opportunities to use this data. “If you put it in pre-training for a big LLM, what comes out on the other end of that is actually very hard to know and could be very, very, very interesting,” he said, referring to large language models like OpenAI’s ChatGPT.

 

Vitak said potential buyers could use the data for research. “23andMe partnered with numerous researchers, so there could be buyers that would continue to expand access to that type of data to advance precision medicine or other types of research,” she said.

 

Given the breadth, nature, and potential of 23andMe’s data, Vitak and Klosowski said the sale is unprecedented.

 

“Any organization dealing with data as sensitive as our genetic material has a moral responsibility to take extra care,” Vitak said.

 

Are there laws that exist to protect you?

Vitak and Klosowski said consumers need more federal protections regarding genetic data privacy.

 

Some states have implemented laws to help protect consumer data, including Montana, where, in 2023, state legislators passed the Genetic Information Privacy Act, which is focused on protecting consumers’ genetic data. California has similar protections for genetic data with direct-to-consumer testing companies.

 

The federal government, meanwhile, enforces the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, which bars employers and health insurers from discriminating against individuals based on genetic information.

 

However, Vitak said the United States also needs something like the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation, which enforces broader protections for data processing.

 

“The data breach and the sale are further making the case for why we need stronger data protection for consumers,” Vitak.

 

https://dnyuz.com/2025/04/13/heres-what-potential-23andme-buyers-could-do-with-your-genetic-data/

Anonymous ID: d50bce April 14, 2025, 10:40 p.m. No.22913365   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3366 >>3846 >>4094

Ghislaine Maxwell: I think Jeff Epstein was murdered

 

Shadow of Ezra

@ShadowofEzra

Ghislaine Maxwell is now taking her case to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking to have her s*x trafficking conviction thrown out.

 

Her legal team argues that she was protected under a non-prosecution deal the government previously struck with Jeffrey Epstein.

 

Maxwell received a 20-year prison sentence for recruiting young women for Epstein's abuse.

 

Years after her arrest, she stated she regretted ever meeting Epstein.

 

https://x.com/ShadowofEzra/status/1910838802144256130

Anonymous ID: d50bce April 14, 2025, 10:43 p.m. No.22913375   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3410 >>4174 >>4228

Letitia James and 16 blue states sue Linda McMahon over $1 billion in leftover Covid pandemic funding

 

The Trump administration abruptly cut states’ access to Covid pandemic funding for school programs, saying they’d had enough time to spend it.

 

Sixteen attorneys general and a Democratic governor sued the Trump administration on Thursday to restore access to over $1 billion in federal pandemic relief aid for schools that was recently halted, saying that the pullback could cause acute harm to students.

The suit, led by New York’s attorney general, Letitia James, and filed in Manhattan federal court, is one of the latest efforts by states to fight President Trump’s clawback of funding allocated to programs he does not want the government to support. The funding was part of a windfall of more than $190 billion that the U.S. Department of Education distributed to schools at the height of the coronavirus pandemic.

The government’s reversal “triggered chaos,” the suit says. New York was one of the states with the most unspent money: over $130 million. California had more than $205 million in unspent money, and Maryland had $245 million, the most among the states that sued.

“Cutting school systems’ access to vital resources that our students and teachers rely on is outrageous and illegal,” Ms. James said in a news release.

The coalition’s filing on Thursday comes nearly a month after 21 Democratic attorneys general sued the administration for firing about half of the Education Department’s staff. Linda McMahon, the education secretary, said the move would help the department deliver services more efficiently.

The White House also suspended millions of dollars in teacher-training grants that it argued would promote diversity, equity and inclusion, which prompted yet another suit from New York and other states.

Thursday’s move was made in concert with the attorneys general of Arizona, California, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, Oregon and the District of Columbia. Gov. Josh Shapiro of Pennsylvania also joined the suit; his state’s attorney general, a Republican, replaced him in that role last year.

The new suit revolves around the Education Department’s recent cancellation of more than $1 billion in unspent federal relief aid sent to schools to help address the wreckage of the pandemic. The Biden administration had previously granted many states an extension to spend their remaining funding through March 2026.

But Ms. McMahon said in a letter to state education leaders late last month that they had been given “ample time” to spend the money and that extending the deadline “years after the Covid pandemic ended” did not align with the administration’s priorities.

The states pushed back in their suit, arguing that much of the funding Congress had allocated had gone to programs not tied to “the duration of the public health emergency.”

In a statement on Thursday, Matthew J. Platkin, New Jersey’s attorney general, called the suspension of the funding “cruel.”

“This rash decision hurts school districts across our state, throwing their budgets into turmoil and hurting their ability to provide the quality education to which students are entitled,” Mr. Platkin said.

The unspent dollars make up a small fraction of the total amount that was distributed to schools. Still, superintendents across the nation have argued that the leftover money is not a luxury but a lifeline for students, and that its removal would force them to cut or scale back efforts to help children catch up in subjects like reading and math, along with other projects.

Some states said the move would threaten improvements to busing for homeless children. Gov. Maura Healey of Massachusetts said on social media that the move would “take us backwards” and jeopardize plans for math tutors, school health centers and building upgrades.

Editors’ Picks

Why Wasn’t Anyone Traumatized in the ‘White Lotus’ Finale?

Is the Restaurant Good? Or Does It Just Look Good?

This Easy Crumble Has Peanut Butter-and-Jelly Vibes

Ms. McMahon said that federal officials would reconsider extensions for states that explained why specific projects were essential for helping students recover from the pandemic, but signaled that the Education Department did not believe infrastructure upgrades qualified.

“They want this money for BUILDINGS, not learning recovery,” a spokeswoman for the department wrote on social media in response to the Massachusetts governor.

The flood of federal pandemic relief funding came with few outright spending restrictions, and districts used it on projects from hiring teachers to upgrading air-conditioning. But it also attracted scrutiny from Republicans in Congress, who claimed that money meant to “address students’ learning loss” was “being used to pay for radical curricula to indoctrinate students.”

 

https://archive.is/gOCG7#selection-717.0-897.126

Anonymous ID: d50bce April 14, 2025, 10:49 p.m. No.22913394   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3410 >>4174 >>4228

Senator Aric Nesbitt

@SenAricNesbitt

🚨Just in: Detroit Economic club plays President Trump’s theme song from “The Apprentice” to introduce Gretchen Whitmer 😂

 

https://x.com/SenAricNesbitt/status/1911817712155992252

Anonymous ID: d50bce April 14, 2025, 10:49 p.m. No.22913396   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3410 >>4174 >>4228

John Stossel

@JohnStossel

China just stopped shipping 7 types of rare earth metals to the U.S.

 

Minerals used to make electric vehicles, military and tech products.

 

America has these minerals.

 

Why don't we mine them here?

 

Here's why:

 

https://x.com/JohnStossel/status/1911918605458952203