why? so we can insult them and run 'em oft?
>i'm pretty sure there's only 1 power-tripping baker and 1 bv from what i can tell
kek
I already got my "warning" from BV today (hahaha)…right in the middle of a handoff no less.
I'm guessing it's just a matter of time until I'm banned again.
It don't matter tho…I ain't baking again until the bullshit with Notables is straightened out…too subjective for me…turning into a popularity contest, and I ALWAYS lose those. KEK!
>this whole baker/bv/notables shit has kind of ruined that but it's the best we've got right now
Yeah, it's kinda disheartening…I've been baking since late Feb/early March, and it's been a pleasure to serve. Good days and bad days, fer sher, but totally worth it overall. Learned a lot about shills, but the Notables thing has gotten progressively worse. I wouldn't mind seeing them go away altogether…as I said, too subjective and an unnecessary source of contention/division. Maybe BO will set up a poll like he did with the tripcode idea when he gets back.
>you and i have no idea what they are up against. none.
THIS RIGHT HERE
I get that it's cool to be an anonymous internet badass and all, but there is a place for empathy at some point…compassion is not a weakness. kek
>but Baker doesn't have time to monitor two breads simultaneously
I didn't say anything about monitoring the thread…just CREATING it.
Content creation/monitoring would be done by anons themselves, and all the baker would have to do would be coordinate the links.
My big peeve is the subjective nature of Notables…anon said it earlier: "One baker's notable is another anon's shite."
like I said, I don't like to complain about shit unless I have a solution to offer.
up to anons to decide. WWG1WGA