>>2293807
>Night crew got the diggs
All the digs are belong to us ; )
>>2293807
>Skin nice and thickened at this point, and night crew always has my back.
Good to hear, wouldn't worry about anything then.
>Calling out "namefagger" bakers
Guess that's going to happen and surprised it hasn't until now tbh. We've such a long history with nfbakers as it's caused a lot of division along the way. Trouble is that now we appear to have no choice but to namefag / pic fag if we want to bake. Anons wanted safe bakers, we decided not to tripcode / namefag but it's ended up that we have to anyway which has defeated the purpose of not tripping. I offered to backup a couple of breads ago w/o namefagging b/c I don't like to, and TZ baker didn't respond, nor did BV to check me for later if baker needed a handoff. Anyway, I can understand that some anons are pissed with the namefagging we're having to do it seems.
If it's genuine shills on the other hand, nf'ing also makes us bakers more of a target, as it sounds like you were last night / this morning. When we're all anon, we don't have to worry about being personally targeted by shill groups. Sorry that happened to you baker, I understand your strategy and agree that it's a good plan.
As a solution to this, when BO is back I'm going to suggest that bakers get a tripcode only, no name, so we don't have to pic fag, don't have to name fag in order to get a handoff, and don't have to worry about changing IP's (as I always do through travel and using various connections), and baker history. Anyway I digress somewhat…
>No need to waste our energy that way
Absolutely. Keep it positive and don't give it energy. We carry on <3