Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 6:35 a.m. No.22939353   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22938102 41-Year-Old ‘Wannabe GI Jane’ Sues U.S. Navy After Failing to Become First Female SEALPN

 

41-Year-Old ‘Wannabe GI Jane’ Sues U.S. Navy After Failing to Become First Female SEAL

by Jim Hᴏft Apr. 21, 2025

A 41-year-old Long Island attorney is taking the U.S. Navy to federal court after claiming recruiters deliberately dragged their feet on her application to become the first female Navy SEAL — until it was too late. (It was too late when she applied. Even then she was 33 or 34, max age for Seals is 30 and that’s an exception)

 

Amanda S. Reynolds, a self-described “Viking-like” warrior, has filed an age discrimination lawsuitagainst the Navy, accusing officials of stalling her application process long enough for her to miss the service’s age cutoff, according to The New York Post.

 

“I could have gone to officer candidate school in February,” Reynolds told The Post.“But they delayed my applicationwithout reason or cause and then they told me I was too old.”

 

Reynolds claims she was misled at every turn, with recruiters assuring her that age waivers were “always obtainable.” Yet despite what she describes as years of diligent preparation and physical training — including long-distance running, swimming, and scuba certification — her file was never submitted in time. (Did she meet all the requirements, those three things are only minor part of requirements)

 

“The opportunity … was kind of taken away from me. I would like that to be reinstated,” Reynolds said. “Iwould just like the outcome to be determined by the merits instead of by some sort of technicality. (That’s stupid she is trying to change the physical and mental rules it’s not a technicality)

 

According to Navyseals.com, “Applicants must be from 17 to 28 years old. Waivers for men ages 29 and 30 are available for highly qualified candidates. Men with prior enlisted service as SEALs who are seeking to become SEAL Officers can request waivers to age 33.”

 

The Woodbury, NY resident had previously worked for over a decade in litigation lawbefore deciding to pivot to military service in 2018. After being sworn into the Navy in Brooklyn, Reynolds claims she was never assigned to a unit, never deployed, and never processed into active duty status.

 

The Navy, meanwhile, disputes the timeline, stating it has “no record of service” for Reynolds and that herenlistment paperwork was first filed in 2019.

 

After a brief move to Utah,Reynolds says she revived her efforts in 2020, only to be sidelined by a DUI arrest— a misdemeanor charge that was later dismissed in 2023. Still, she pressed on,eventually entering the Navy SEAL Warrior Challenge Program in 2023 with the hope of breaking the gender barrierin the elite special forces unit. (That makes no sense even in 2023 she would have been too old to be a Seal, regardless of gender)

 

But instead of advancing her candidacy,recruiters allegedly pushed her toward the Judge Advocate General (JAG) Corps, citing her legal background.

 

“I wound up bringing a lawsuit in federal court in New York in order topursue an age discriminationclaim against the Navy in order to have my opportunity reinstated. So that’s where I’m at now, in the stage of the process. And hopefully, with the help of the courts and judicial intervention,I’ll be able to pursue that route as a career, notwithstanding my age,” she said.

 

(Is she fighting for a class of people and both sexes turned away that were over 30, because it’s not discrimination, it’s a qualification of a limited age that can do this job, she’s calling age instead of what she really wants to sue on, sex discrimination but she can’t do that because age applies to both sex’s.This whole thing is a stunt even men wouldn’t be allowed to join the Seals over age 30.Plus she is 11 years older today than the highest age by exception can be.Age discrimination has nothing to do with it,it’s the military requirements of physical, mental, advanced training and lots of other requirements that men and women must meet; as they get older they have lost the super peak physical powers of under age 30. There are a lot of requirements for the job, just like if you are trying to get a job as an accountant without math training.And it’s definitely not sex discrimination, see article next post. Her asking to be reinstated at age 41 is just nuts.This is just a women’s lib hoax, she’s trying to break age and sex discrimination but under military rules it applies to men and women. It’s just the requirements to do the job.)

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/41-year-old-wannabe-gi-jane-sues-u/

 

See requirements next post..

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 6:37 a.m. No.22939363   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9373 >>9380 >>9670 >>9740

>>22939353

(Here’s her pic)

March 15, 2021Requirements for Seals proving women can be in the Seals

 

Has there ever been a female Navy SEAL? Can a female become a Navy SEAL?Are there different requirements or different tests for females vs. males attempting to pass SEAL training and selection? All of these are great questions, and we’ll answer these along with giving some helpful information about SEAL training and selection and whether or not a female can become a Navy SEAL. The short answer… Hell yeah they can!

 

Has there ever been a female Navy SEAL?

 

While the U.S. Navy has yet to have a female join their ranks as a Navy SEAL,they did recently have the first female to ever pass the grueling and demanding U.S. Navy SEAL officer training course. That in and of itself is quite the accomplishment, considering the fact that 75% of those who sign up for the 6-month training program quit before it’s over.

 

Originally, Navy SEALs were just one of two communities that were required by law to not allow women to join. The other is Navy SWCC (Special warfare combatant-craft crewmen). However, that is not the case today.

 

Are women capable of becoming Navy SEALs?

 

Yes. Here are some of the qualifications that both men and women must pass in order to begin training.

 

Eyesight requirements: 20/40 best eye; 20/70 worst eye; correctable to 20/25 with no color blindness

Meet the minimum Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) score: GS+MC+EI=170 or VE+MK+MC+CS=220 or VE+AR=110 MC=50

Be 28 years of age or younger

Pass a physical examination that’s required for divers

Be a U.S. Citizen and eligible for security clearance.

Physical Requirements

 

Ages 17-19

20 push-ups (in 2 minutes)

54 curl-ups (in 2 minutes)

1.5 mile run (in 18:37)

Ages 20-24

17 push-ups (in 2 minutes)

50 curl-ups (in 2 minutes)

1.5 mile run (in 18:37)

These fitness standards must be maintained after Boot Camp in order to pass a Physical Readiness Test.

 

 

What’s different about female Navy SEAL training?

 

Nothing. Females and males must go through the same level of training as required by men. Training will prepare both men and women for extreme mental and physical challenges. It requires over 12 months of initial training, followed by 18 months of pre-deployment and specialized training.

 

This includes:

 

7 weeks of Diver Preparation Course

15 weeks of Second Class Dive School for training in any of these areas

Air and mixed gas diving

Underwater cutting and welding

Demolition

Recompression chamber operations

Underwater hydraulic tools

Ship maintenance, repair and salvage

Fleet Training

Advanced Training

 

https://soaa.org/first-female-navy-seal/

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 6:40 a.m. No.22939373   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22939363

Military Recruitment under Bidan

Facing dire recruiting realities, Navy raises max enlistment age to 41

(The President Joe Bidan Curse, no one wanted to serve under dictator with all his work policies)

GeoffZNov. 7, 2022

The Navy raised its maximum enlistment age to 41 on Friday for sailors joining the fleet, a nod to the current recruiting struggles plaguing the entire U.S. military.

 

Before last week’s policy change, the age cutoff for enlisted sailors was 39, with recruits needing to report to boot camp by their 40th birthday.

 

Under the change, 41-year-olds must report to recruit training by their 42nd birthday and cannot have previously served in the military.

 

Certain Navy communities,such as the SEAL and diver worlds, still have age cutoffs that differ from the general enlistment age, Navy Recruiting Command spokesman Cmdr. Dave Benham said in an email.

 

“As we continue to navigate a challenging recruiting environment, raising the enlistment age allows us to widen the pool of potential recruits, creating opportunities for personnel who wish to serve,” Benham said.

 

Friday’s policy change means the Navy is now accepting the oldest enlisted recruits of the four services.

 

The Army’s max enlistment age is 35, while the Air Force’s cap is 40. The Marine Corps’ enlisted age limit is 28, according to a U.S. government site that lays out military joining procedures.

 

The Navy barely made its recruiting goal for active-duty enlisted in Fiscal Year 2022, which ended Sept. 30, bringing in 33,442 sailors — just 42 bodies more than the service’s goal.(Who was President? Joe Bidan)

 

The Navy fell about 200 active-duty officers short of its FY22 recruiting efforts, and the reserves also saw shortfalls.

 

Recruiting in Fiscal Year 2023, which began Oct. 1, will likely be even harder, Rear Adm. Alexis Walker, the head of Navy Recruiting Command, said in a September news release.

 

While the Navy hit its enlisted active accessions goal for FY22, the service drained its Delayed Entry Program pool andfinished the year with the lowest “DEP pool” in decades, according to the release.

 

The delayed entry program is supposed to allow future sailors to sign a contract while holding off on shipping to boot camp. The program is designed to help recruits acclimate to military life and provide the Navy with an added measure of regulating the flow of bodies to boot camp and follow-on training.

 

But today, the program pool is at “critically low levels,” according to the Navy, and a third of the remaining pool comprises high schoolers who can’t ship until they graduate in the spring.

 

“The Navy is expected to be in a contract-and-ship posture, where future Sailors are shipped to boot camp within weeks or even days of contracting to serve,” the Navy warned in September. “This posture is expected to persist through FY23.”

 

The Navy is also offering big money to attract Americans into service.

 

Enlistment bonuses reached $50,000 in August, and a student loan repayment plan offers repayment of up to $65,000 in debt.

 

“They are not mutually exclusive, so if a future Sailor maximizes both, that adds up to a life-altering $115,000, and the opportunity to serve in the world’s finest Navy,” Walker said in September’s release.

 

The Air Force made its FY22 recruiting goals, but like the Navy, leadership warned that they largely limped across the finish line.

 

The Army missed its recruiting goal by about 15,000, while the Marine Corps made its recruiting mission for FY22 but warned that harder days are ahead.

 

https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2022/11/07/facing-dire-recruiting-realities-navy-raises-max-enlistment-age-to-41/

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 7 a.m. No.22939500   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>22939373

(This article if filled with untruths)

Here’s how many new sailors the Navy wants to recruit this year

Diana StancyNov 4, 2024

 

The Navy is seeking to recruit 40,600 new sailorsin fiscal year 2025 after exceeding its recruitment goals last year, the service announced.

 

Theservice failed to meet its accession targets for the first time ever in FY23, amid recruitment challenges military leaders blamed on a variety of factors, from more thorough medical screenings for applicants, fewer Americans eligibleto serve and low civilian unemployment. (This is a lie, the Navy is telling lies, unemployment was at an all time high; it was Joe Bidan they didn’t want to work for; then you had to dumb down test scores to hire retards.)

 

The Navy’s FY25 accessions target, the same as last year’s goal, comes as the service announced it brought in a total of 40,978 new recruits in FY24. The service attributes its success last year to “data-driven decision-making,” cutting down the time to process medical waivers and “expanding opportunities.” (And lower reading, writing and test skillsunfucking believable)

 

Among these changes are installing a two-star admiral to head recruiting stations and centers, adjusting recruiting goals from monthly to annual, and creating a Recruiting Operations Center in October 2023 to address recruitment issues and streamline the entire recruiting process.

 

“We are building on the foundation of success from FY24 while tackling new challenges head-on,” Rear Adm. James Waters, Commander of Navy Recruiting Command, said in a statement. “With the strategies we’ve implemented, the talent we have in place, and the support from leadership, I’m confident that we’ll meet our goals and continue to bring in the best and brightest to serve our nation.” (They allowed much dumber people in when Joe was President and Hegseth is going to change that back? Of course the people want to serve under Trump.)

 

Likewise, the Navy has incorporated multiple reforms in recent years to address recruiting challenges.For example, the service started allowing those without a high school diploma or General EducationalDevelopment credential to enlist this year,if they score a 50 or higher on the Armed Forces Qualification Test.(that’s 50 out of 100)

 

The Navy also started a pilot program in December2022 allowing sailors who scored lower on the Armed Forces Qualification Test to still enlist in the Navy.

 

The shift meantpotential sailors who scored between the 10th and 30th percentile on the AFQT were eligibleto join if their ASVAB individual line scores qualified for a Navy rating. (They lowered the Navy Rating. How many retards and gang members did they recruit?)

 

https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2024/11/04/heres-how-many-new-sailors-the-navy-wants-to-recruit-this-year/

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 7:37 a.m. No.22939684   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9689 >>9740

Top 10 Military Changes with President Trump: Key Shifts 1/2

January 13, 2025 By larryf

Donald Trump’s potential return to the presidency raises questions about US military policy. This article explores the potential top 10 military changes under President Trump. We’ll analyze everything from budget and troop deployments to social policies and national security, using insights from his past term, campaign rhetoric, and expert opinions.

 

A second Trump administration could bring significant shifts to military policy. These potential changes are important for active-duty troops, veterans, and potential recruits. Understanding these changes is vital for those serving in the armed forces.

 

Table of Contents:

Top 10 Military Changes With President Trump

  1. Increased Military Spending

  2. Troop Size and Deployment

  3. Modernization of Military Equipment

  4. Reversal of LGBTQ+ Policies?

  5. Veterans Affairs

  6. Potential Reinstatement of Transgender Ban

  7. Abortion Policy

  8. National Guard

  9. Military Cooperation with Allies

  10. Impact of Former Officials’ Statements

Conclusion

Top 10 Military Changes With President Trump

 

1.Increased Military Spending

Trump has consistently supported a larger defense budget. His past proposed $54 billion increase during his first term suggests this trend may continue. This potential increase could impact various aspects of the defense department.

 

2.Troop Size and Deployment

Trump has expressed intentions to grow and reposition the military. However, specifics regarding troop numbers and deployments remain unclear. More information is needed to fully understand these plans.

 

3.Modernization of Military Equipment

A focus on military modernization could mean increased spending on technology. This might include cyber warfare, advanced weaponry, and the Space Force. These investments could shift budgets and resource allocation.

 

4.Reversal of LGBTQ+ Policies?

Trump’s campaign rhetoric suggests revisiting policies affecting LGBTQ+ service members. He may target transgender service in the military. This raises uncertainty for transgender individuals serving openly.

 

5.Veterans Affairs

Trump’s previous term hinted at potential Veterans Affairs adjustments. This included boosting mental health funding. Trump also suggested allowing veterans to seek care from private providers under the Veterans Affairs program. This sparked debate over access to care and the role of private healthcare.

 

6.Potential Reinstatement of Transgender Ban

The transgender military ban saw significant changes under the Trump and Biden administrations. Biden lifted the ban. Trump’s campaign statements raise the possibility of reinstating it, which would impact transgender people in the military.

 

Estimates of transgender service members vary. A 2016 survey reported just under 9,000, while another source estimates closer to 15,000. Both represent a small number compared to the roughly two million personnel in the armed forces.

 

Between 2016 and 2021, the Pentagon spent $15 million on transgender troop healthcare, including $11.5 million for therapy and $3.1 million for surgeries. The Pentagon’s annual healthcare budget for active-duty military exceeds $6 billion.

 

https://usmilitary.com/military-changes-with-president-trump/

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 7:39 a.m. No.22939689   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9740

>>22939684

2/2

7.Abortion Policy

Changes to reproductive healthcare access for service members are possible. Secretary Lloyd Austin enacted a policy covering abortion travel, a significant policy change during President Joe Biden’s term. This policy has been used a limited number of times, costing $45,000 between June and December 2023.

 

8.National Guard

Discussions surrounding a separate Space National Guard and quality of life improvements continue. The Air Force opposes the Space National Guard. Pay raises for junior enlisted troops in the National Guard are also being discussed. These topics show potential bipartisan support within military affairs despite political divides.

 

9.Military Cooperation with Allies

Trump’s foreign policy may impact military partnerships. He criticized NATO members’ defense spending during his presidency. However, progress towards NATO’s GDP targets could mean future cooperation.

 

10.Impact of Former Officials’ Statements(of course they had to include these)

Statements from former Trump administration officials may influence public perception. John Kelly’s comments labeling Trump as “authoritarian” and concerns over domestic military deploymenthave drawn attention. Gen. Milley, former defense secretaries Mattis and Esper, and Adm. Stavridis have also made public statements about Trump.

 

Trump’s social media presence and past controversies have generated significant discussion. Many speculate about how a potential second term might unfold, particularly concerning his use of communication platforms and public engagement.

 

Conclusion

Forecasting the exact top 10 military changes under a potential second Trump presidency is difficult. Many factors can influence final policy decisions. However, considering Trump’s previous actions, statements, and expert analysis, we can better understand potential shifts in military policy during a second term. These possible top 10 military changes with President Trump warrant careful attention and offer valuable insights into US military affairs.

 

https://usmilitary.com/military-changes-with-president-trump/

 

Its quite concerning the military websites usually have a lot of criticism for Trump, but the troops don’t feel that way

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 7:54 a.m. No.22939729   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9733 >>9740 >>9742

Supreme Court considers parents’ efforts to exempt children from books with LGBTQ themes

By Amy Howe Apr 21, 2025 at 12:56 pm

 

The Supreme Court

The court will hear arguments in Mahmoud v. Taylor on Tuesday.

 

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on Tuesday in the first of two cases in April involving religion and public schools. In Mahmoud v. Taylor a coalition of parents from Montgomery County, Md., contend that requiring their children to participate in instruction that includes LGBTQ+ themes violates their religious beliefs and thus their First Amendment right to freely exercise their religion.

 

Montgomery County, in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., is the largest school district in Maryland and one of the country’s most religiously diverse counties. The dispute before the justices on Tuesday began in 2022, when the county approved books featuring LGBTQ+ characters for inclusion in its language-arts curriculum. One book used for young children, Pride Puppy, tells the story of a puppy that gets lost during a Pride parade. Another book tells the story of a girl attending her uncle’s same-sex wedding.

 

When the county announced in 2023 that it would not allow parents to opt to have their children excused from instruction involving the storybooks, a group of Muslim, Catholic, and Ukrainian Orthodox parents went to federal court. They contended that the refusal to give them the option to opt their children out violated their constitutional right to freely exercise their religion – specifically, their ability to instruct their children on issues of gender and sexuality according to their faith and to control when and how these issues are introduced to their children.

 

The lower courts rejected the parents’ request for an order that would temporarily require the county, while the litigation continued, to notify the parents when the storybooks would be used and give them a chance to opt out of instruction. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit explained that on the “threadbare” record before it, the parents had not shown that exposure to the storybooks compelled them to violate their religion.

 

The parents came to the Supreme Court in September, and the justices agreed to take up their case.

 

In their brief in the Supreme Court, the parents point to two different Supreme Court cases. First, they say, more than 50 years ago in Wisconsin v. Yoder, the justices “recognized ‘beyond debate’ the First Amendment right of parents ‘to guide the religious future and education of their children.’” This means, they say, that under the free exercise clause, parents can opt out of instruction that would “substantially interfere with their religious development.”

 

In Yoder, the parents observe, the court held that Amish parents did not have to send their children to school after the eighth grade, because they believed that doing so conflicted with their religion and way of life. Here, the parents say, they are merely seeking to be able to excuse their young children from one particular subset of the public schools’ instruction that “deliberately seeks to confound their religious values.”

 

And under the Supreme Court’s 1993 decision in Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah, the parents continue, the school board’s policy is unconstitutional because it is neither neutral nor generally applicable. The board of education, the parents stress, has “long allowed notice and opt-outs for any ‘instruction related to family life and human sexuality.’” But by contrast, the parents write, they cannot opt to have their very young children sit out discussions on “sexuality and gender identity during English class.” Moreover, they add, board members have displayed “explicit religious hostility” to the parents who have objected to the curriculum, suggesting that they were aligned with “white supremacists” and “xenophobes.”

 

The Trump administration filed a brief supporting the parents. Sarah Harris, then the acting solicitor general, told the justices that because the county will not notify the parents before the LGBTQ-themed storybooks are used or give them an opportunity to opt out of instruction using those books, parents can only comply with their religious obligations to their children by withdrawing their children from public school altogether. “That,” Harris contends, “is textbook interference with the free exercise of religion” – even if the parents’ children do not ultimately feel pressured or coerced by the instruction using the storybooks.

 

https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/supreme-court-considers-parents-efforts-to-exempt-children-from-books-with-lgbtq-themes/

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 7:55 a.m. No.22939733   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9740

>>22939729

 

2/2

The Montgomery County Board of Education (along with the superintendent of schools, Thomas Taylor, and members of the board) counter that under both the Constitution and the Supreme Court’s cases interpreting the free exercise clause, the parents must show that either they or their children are being coerced to change their religious beliefs or practice. The Supreme Court, they contend, has never held that when parents opt to send their children to public schools, their children’s exposure to material to which their parents have religious objections is the kind of coercion needed to establish a claim under the free exercise clause, and it should not do so here.

 

The board cautions that accepting the parents’ argument that the lack of an opt-out option imposes a burden on their religious beliefs would “leave public education in shreds” “by entitling parents to pick and choose which aspects of the curriculum will be taught to their children.”

 

But in any event, the board continues, the parents have not shown that in this case that there has been any coercion. They have not provided any evidence, the board stresses, “that any parent or child was penalized for his or her religious beliefs, asked to affirm any views contrary to his or her faith, or otherwise prohibited or deterred from engaging in religious practice.”

 

The Supreme Court,the board writes, should not consider the parents’ argument that the policy is not neutral and generally applicable, because they did not make it in the lower courts. But in any event, the board adds, the policy is in fact both of those things: “It treats comparable religious and secular activity exactly the same; no opt-outs from ELA lessons using the storybooks are permitted.” And there is no indication that the policy was based on a hostility to religion. Instead, MCPS decided to stop the opt-outs because it received too many requests that were not based on religion.

 

A decision in the case is expected by late June or early July.

 

https://www.scotusblog.com/2025/04/supreme-court-considers-parents-efforts-to-exempt-children-from-books-with-lgbtq-themes/

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 7:58 a.m. No.22939750   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9766

Did AG Letitia James 'reap what she sowed'?

'The Big Weekend Show' co-hosts break down the 'irony' of New York Attorney General Letitia James claiming the mortgage fraud accusations against her are false.

 

6:06

 

https://youtu.be/Aj1K10UDqmM

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 8 a.m. No.22939759   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Dad takes action after school 'forced' gender identity book on son

La Costa Heights parent Carlos Encinas joins 'Fox & Friends' alongside First Liberty Institute's Kayla Toney to discuss the lawsuit and how they are taking action to protect parental rights in the classroom

 

4:50

 

https://youtu.be/eiK_k81t1to

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 8:06 a.m. No.22939782   🗄️.is 🔗kun

'UNWIND GANG ACTIVITY': Youngkin touts state's crackdown against criminal migrants

Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin breaks down the state's 521 total arrests of criminal immigrants on 'The Story.'

 

5:02

 

https://youtu.be/NI7OfYmda1U

Anonymous ID: 34c418 April 22, 2025, 8:13 a.m. No.22939799   🗄️.is 🔗kun

SAVE THEIR A–': Hegseth sets record straight on new group chat allegations

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth joins 'Fox & Friends' to respond to new group chat allegations,why Pentagon officials were placed on leave amid a leak investigation and one former official's criticism of his leadership at the DOD.

 

13:04

 

https://youtu.be/IoDVzWIj77Y