There's that famous retort from a SC Justice what he defined pornography as (this was in context as to what form of speech isn't protected under the 1st Amendment.
His answer was "I may not be able to define it, but know it when I see it."
Not all forms of speech are protected. There's that old saying about not being able to yell fire in a crowded movie theater.
I offer that just as background - I understand the greatness of 'free speech' and I'm a big advocate. I realize people get triggered when enhanced 'hate speech' laws are passed to protect certain groups/punish behaviors.
That said, I would be in total agreement with BO/BV implementing a total ban on GoreAnon posts. I understand I could simply filter and move on. I'm also not a snowflake who hasn't seen similar images nor gets traumatized and muh feels "once seen, I can't unsee" make it stop, make it stop!
My take is this. First there are impressionable newbies with a good heart who are first coming round to learn up on the GA, and Q. I also agree with the modern definition that their posts, yes I believe it's alphabet faggotry, lack "any social, artistic or educational value." That's a paraphrase, but I'm close - old tablet makes multi-tasking difficult. The strongest argument I can think of is similar gore photos could be used by law enforcement or people working with anatomy/forensics. However, those reasons have zero to do with qresearch, post in a separate thread for gore if you must. The fact they don't only proves their evil intent.
I realize this is wordy, but I feel compelled to speak. The main reason, and I've said it before (beautiful naked young lady juxtaposed with WW11 oven, or naked picnic lady with happy merchant in corner), is that this is MKUlta type advanced faggotry. Weaker minds then mine, if predisposed or in a sensitive stage of development, can have the wiring in their brains altered. One can literally begin associating healthy erotic feelings with harm/gore/violence. Cue that scene in a Clockwork Orange where the protagonist is forced, with eyes pried open, to endless violent images….if I recall, it's the movie 12 Days later where animal advocates break into a lab to free animals and find a monkey strapped down forced to watch violent, disgusting images on multiple monitors.
This shit is real and has no place here. Shills need not reply, for I care not if you disagree. I felt it my duty to raise awareness and muh concern, to call out these fags and what they're doing. They actually achieve their goals by doing it. Claiming muh 'free speech' and chans don't ban is exactly what they count on hiding behind. Do you really think the President can acknowledge what we do knowing young impressionable minds will see those? Roseaane gets fired for making a lame meme, misunderstood and not intended to be muh racist, people across the political lines were revolted by Kathy Griffin's fake severed head but Secretary Sanders is going to direct people here being advised it contains inflammatory, subversive, violent and sensitive inter-racial images? Wake the fuck up!