>>22943522 lb

This is why I complained for so long this is just becoming a glorified news aggregate site that's mostly populated by AI. It's frankly been like this for years. This isn't what we wanted out of Q Research. Q Research was supposed to be for detailed research, an area to organize and share information with each other and to strategize about how to disseminate the drops. Aggregating news information is an entirely different sector of a Q Research open source setting where we receive information, dissect it and then coordinate its dissemination.

>>22943496 lb

The term "jew" was only really in use since the

1700s. "Ancient Hebrew" either didn't exist and was a farce this whole time, or only began circulating in popular use (potentially resurrected, but we'd need evidence for that) in around 200 BC, when the Torah was first written.

So the question is who were the real Israelites? Who were the people from the "Land of Milk and Honey"? Were they, perhaps, people who regularly drank milk (so pastoral herders who rode horses, probably, right?)? Were they possibly people obsessed with Apiculture? Those are some fun questions, right? Any idea what sort of answers and further questions they lead to?