Anonymous ID: 5c17e5 July 26, 2018, 5:09 a.m. No.2295031   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>Shills in overdrive.

>DS dropping stories they've been sitting on for years.

>FB stock plummets.

>Something big is coming.

 

Yep. And truly I find even the gore tard more tolerable than Rtard.

Anonymous ID: 5c17e5 July 26, 2018, 5:59 a.m. No.2295230   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5241 >>5571 >>5576 >>5675

>>2295206

>>2295196

>>2295163

>>2295192

 

Interdasting.

 

Anons on the Wakaya dig

 

When Q made the drop with the code yesterday I was thinking perhaps related to the court dockets of the NXIVM court documents because of timeliness.

 

A one-poster anon had attached one page of one court document in the same bread as Q posted, or the one beforehand. It got little attention.

 

Then when Q posted I wanted to compare court docket numbers w/ that code, asked if anyone had saved that or screenshotted.

 

Then again in next bread, I think? โ€“ I get mixed up just trying to follow too much at onceโ€“ a one-poster anon dinged me with the link to all the charges. I looked through but could find no correlation to Q's code, but still feel something about that one poster anon and those docs, whether related to Q code or no.

 

Here is link:

https://www.google.de/maps/place/Wakaya/@-17.6242183,178.9929916,7087m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x6e1ec726d4116d9b:0xdc1abce65e819072!8m2!3d-17.6160613!4d179.0012007

Anonymous ID: 5c17e5 July 26, 2018, 6:33 a.m. No.2295409   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5424 >>5442 >>5595 >>5639 >>5650 >>5672

>>2295328

For the life of me I will never understand why Anons want to push the Q identity question or the Q Anon movement. Why in God's name would we want to dox Q? Much less make things difficult for our beloved POTUS? Plus Q went silent for something like 20 days โ€“ this was following the whole wear-Q-shirts-at-rallies-and-be-filmed movement. Frankly, there are many ways to dig, meme, pray, and red pill without even mentioning Q.

This is not a game

Anonymous ID: 5c17e5 July 26, 2018, 6:46 a.m. No.2295495   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5618

>>2295424

>we want the press to ask the admin about itโ€ฆ thats the goal.

 

Point me to a post where Q has instructed us that is the "goal".

 

And who do you mean by the "Press"? MSM? The ones who cover rallies the most? Do you really think THEY would give objective coverage?

Anonymous ID: 5c17e5 July 26, 2018, 7:23 a.m. No.2295762   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>5777

>>2295672

>IF Q is Real, Q wants us to spread the truth.

Agreed.

>IF Q is Fake, and we are being tricked, we should want to know the truth.

Agreed.

>Q has made statements, which, if false, are illegal.

Not a lawfag, but I think that would be debatable.

>Q's reflections, questions are not intel leaks - they are just plausible deniability crumbsโ€ฆnot illegal, not worried about discovery. in many cases, Q is TEASING the opposition.

Agreed

>he media doesn't want to talk about Q

Q wants them to.

I don't think Q teams wants them to talk about Q so much as Q team wants MSM to objectively report about a whole myriad of corrupt political issues, including, but not limited to: money laundering, racketeering, election fraud, human trafficking, pedophilia, mind control of the masses, etc. and on and on

>force them to ask.

Agree โ€“ Q wants us as PATRIOTS to FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT very loudly and without fear to confront these issues and take our government back as WE THE PEOPLE. In my view, we should each pick ONE issue to rally against; not merely get rally behind Q in the delusional belief that MSM would or could cover the attendant issues objectively.