Anonymous ID: d393ed July 26, 2018, 7:04 a.m. No.2295634   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5648 >>5656 >>5658

>>2295584

understood.

but he worked for CA.

he has insider information.

i believe he's /ourguy/

it was just of note.

 

also, look at what i collected from last night to this morning. we have more control than we realize. please, please, no more giraffes.

Anonymous ID: d393ed July 26, 2018, 7:10 a.m. No.2295672   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5762

>>2295409

apply this logic:

 

IF Q is Real, Q wants us to spread the truth

IF Q is Fake, and we are being tricked, we should want to know the truth.

 

Q has made statements, which, if false, are illegal.

Q's reflections, questions are not intel leaks - they are just plausible deniability crumbs…not illegal, not worried about discovery. in many cases, Q is TEASING the opposition.

 

the media doesn't want to talk about Q

Q wants them to.

 

force them to ask.

Anonymous ID: d393ed July 26, 2018, 7:25 a.m. No.2295777   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2295762

excellent points.

it certainly IS debatable

but if you read the huffpo piece which Q linked, it started talking about how dangerous the Qanon movement is.

 

if they think that we think it's legit

and they think we're being fooled

and we think that it's the pres/wh/mil-int

 

the representation of federal authorization, directly or implied - that IS illegal.

 

so - if they push that we're dangerous, they NEED to investigate the authenticity of Q.