Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 7, 2025, 2:23 a.m. No.23002826   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2827 >>7460 >>5918 >>2120

>>22986131

>>22998096

Greens leader Adam Bandt set to lose seat of Melbourne

 

David Crowe and Olivia Ireland - May 7, 2025

 

1/2

 

Greens leader Adam Bandt is set to lose the seat of Melbourne in a shock defeat that leaves the party in disarray after a series of extraordinary setbacks at the election.

 

Labor claimed victory for its candidate, charity chief Sarah Witty, in the tight contest on Wednesday after gaining more than 53 per cent of the vote so far, but Bandt has not conceded.

 

The Australian Electoral Commission extended its booth-by-booth, two-party preferred count of the seat showing substantial swings to Witty, who was leading against Bandt by more than 2000 votes late on Wednesday afternoon.

 

In the key booth of Richmond, which Labor won 51-49 at the 2022 election, Witty won 61-38. In the nearby Cremorne booth, Witty enjoyed a 15 per cent swing while in Fitzroy - a Greens’ stronghold - she was boosted by a near 9 per cent swing.

 

ABC election analyst Anthony Green said on Wednesday afternoon that based on current voting trends, Bandt would lose the seat.

 

Greens observers said there were as many as 15,000 absentee and declaration votes still to be counted, which meant they were not conceding the seat. Among those outstanding votes are 4000 postal ballots, which Witty is winning 64-36.

 

A key factor in the voting so far was the way Labor gained ground across the board in terms of core support, increasing its primary vote in Melbourne by almost 6 per cent and taking second place to Bandt with these votes.

 

The stronger primary vote put Labor in a winning position on Wednesday afternoon because it gained support from voters who had selected Witty ahead of Bandt with their second and later preferences, highlighting the stronger support for Labor over alternatives, including the Liberals.

 

One Labor observer said most of the voters who chose the Liberals with their primary votes gave their preferences to Witty rather than Bandt, saying this reflected on the Greens’ policies and campaign.

 

Another Labor source said Bandt was receiving only 24 per cent of the preferences, but needed 33 per cent to win.

 

“He just needed more preferences to flow back to him,” he said.

 

A Greens spokesperson said the count had to proceed.

 

“While there are many, many thousands of votes to be counted, we are not conceding Melbourne,” the spokesperson said.

 

Witty is a housing advocate and chief executive of the Nappy Collective, which provides free nappies to families in crisis.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 7, 2025, 2:24 a.m. No.23002827   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23002826

 

2/2

 

The count has taken several days because the Australian Electoral Commission did the first count assuming that the final two-candidate outcome was likely to pit the Greens against the Liberals, based on the last election. A second count was conducted when it became clear the final phase would pit the Greens against Labor. This count has not been completed.

 

Bandt achieved one of the greatest victories for the Greens when he won Melbourne from Labor in 2010 and became the first of his party to win a seat in the House of Representatives at a full federal election, beginning a period of growth that led to three other Greens MPs joining him in 2022.

 

His likely defeat is a devastating blow for the party after the loss of Greens housing spokesman Max Chandler-Mather in the Queensland seat of Griffith on Saturday night and the defeat of Greens MP Stephen Bates in the neighbouring seat of Brisbane.

 

The outcome may leave a sole Greens member, Elizabeth Watson-Brown, in the lower house, but she is also in danger of losing her Brisbane seat of Ryan.

 

The party will maintain its strong presence in the Senate, however, with the election results likely to make the Greens even more important because they will hold the balance of power in their own right in the upper house. The government will be able to pass legislation with support from the Greens, without requiring support from other crossbenchers or the Coalition.

 

Labor could overcome objections from the Greens on any law, however, by seeking a negotiation with the Liberals and Nationals.

 

Bandt had predicted the party would win one to four more lower house seats than the four it already held.

 

He pushed back on Monday when asked whether the Greens had focused too much on Australia’s response to the Israel-Gaza war rather than core issues like climate change.

 

“We were the only ones talking about real action on climate change and calling on the government to stop opening new coal and gas mines,” he said.

 

On Gaza, he added: “We wanted to see an end to the invasion and … an end to the bombs being dropped on children.”

 

Labor MPs said the Greens had focused too much on the Middle East with an argument that claimed the Australian government was complicit in the deaths in Gaza, something most Australians did not accept.

 

“It was just nonsense,” said one Labor MP of the Greens’ claims about the Middle East. “Regardless of what people thought should happen in Gaza, the notion of our agency in it was just wrong.”

 

Senators Sarah Hanson-Young, David Shoebridge and Mehreen Faruqi are likely contenders to be the next Greens leader in the event of Bandt’s loss being confirmed.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/greens-leader-adam-bandt-set-to-lose-seat-of-melbourne-20250506-p5lwwf.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjjsN9piGK0

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 7, 2025, 2:33 a.m. No.23002836   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2837 >>4162 >>6612 >>3147 >>3516 >>2120

>>22986131

>>22998090

History-making Wilson wins in Goldstein, Hamer hopes in Kooyong

 

Cara Waters and Rachael Dexter - May 6, 2025

 

1/2

 

Tim Wilson has won Goldstein in a dramatic comeback after building an unassailable lead over teal incumbent MP Zoe Daniel through a postal vote surge.

 

After trailing Daniel by 1800 votes on election night, the Liberal candidate was ahead of the incumbent teal independent MP by 725 votes on Tuesday evening following the latest count update in Goldstein.

 

Wilson’s victory has wider significance for the Liberal Party as it reels in the wake of Saturday’s disastrous election loss to Labor.

 

Wilson was a prominent and energetic member of the Morrison government who led the attack on Labor’s then franking credits policy, and has previously campaigned strongly on free speech.

 

He is also a rare moderate urban Liberal in a party room in the throes of selecting a replacement for Peter Dutton as leader.

 

In another teal versus Liberal contest, Kooyong challenger Amelia Hamer is riding a postal vote surge that is eating away at the lead of incumbent independent Monique Ryan.

 

Ryan leads Hamer 50.5 per cent to 49.5 per cent on a two-candidate-preferred basis. That equates to about 1002 votes based on figures published by the Australian Electoral Commission at 4.30pm on Tuesday.

 

That margin has decreased from about 1400 votes on Monday night with 10,009 votes in the pile yet to be counted, 8564 of which are postal votes.

 

It’s a dramatic change in fortune in both seats with Daniel claiming victory in Goldstein at her election party on Saturday night when she was firmly ahead in the polls. Her lead eroded steadily as postal votes were counted and Wilson took the lead on Tuesday.

 

There were 24,299 postal votes issued in Goldstein and of these 13,982 ballot papers had been counted just after 5pm on Tuesday.

 

There are still 5986 votes received but not yet counted with postal votes strongly favouring Wilson.

 

Daniel has not conceded the seat. Both Wilson and Daniel declined interview requests on Tuesday night.

 

“Out of respect for my scrutineers and the democratic process, I will await further counting,” Daniel said.

 

“With the margin in the hundreds and the remaining votes in the thousands, this seems sensible. Again, I thank all of those who supported me in so many ways during my campaign and with their vote.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 7, 2025, 2:35 a.m. No.23002837   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23002836

 

2/2

 

On election day, Wilson said for him to win Goldstein “would require making three Australian political milestones in one election”.

 

Wilson claims three milestones in his victory: the first federal MP defeated by an independent to retake their seat; the first MP to defeat an incumbent teal; and the first Liberal in 110 years to take a seat off an independent elected at a general election.

 

“I just temper every single part of my enthusiasm to understand the scale and enormity of what it would mean to win,” he said on election day. “I will not believe it until I see the results.”

 

Wilson posted a video on social media on Tuesday night of him celebrating by eating a frozen yoghurt from Yo-Chi.

 

“I know it will spoil my dinner but on days like this, I think you need a celebratory Yo-Chi and I think I’ve earned it,” he said.

 

His win in Goldstein bucks the trend of a statewide negative swing of about 2 per cent against the Liberals.

 

Hamer told broadcaster Jacqui Felgate on 3AW on Tuesday that she thought about picking up the phone and calling Ryan to concede on Saturday, but was told by her team to hold on for postal votes.

 

“I’m one to say you’ve got to put your ego aside in these things,” she said. “The first thing I [did was I] actually did speak to the team [and] said, ‘Look, should I call and concede?’

 

“The team said to me, ‘No, actually, it does look like what’s coming out of pre-poll is much more positive’. And, you know, I trust my team and so we hung on.”

 

Hamer said she and her team were now “cautiously optimistic” but that it was “too close to call anything right now”.

 

“If the postals do continue on the trajectory that we’ve seen so far, you know … there is a pathway,” she said.

 

Hamer was asked to reflect on what went wrong for the Liberals. One theme emerged repeatedly: the campaign lacked substance.

 

“The one piece of feedback I was hearing consistently throughout the campaign,” Hamer said, “is that people wanted to see more substantial policy from us — and they wanted to see it earlier.

 

“Not just, ‘hey nuclear and a little bit of tax here and there’, but substantive taxation reform and a real vision as to what our country should look like, and what it would look like under a Coalition government.”

 

She pointed to the Coalition’s central slogan – “Getting Australia Back on Track” – and questioned its meaning.

 

“We talked a lot about getting Australia back on track, but the question is: back on track to what?” she said.

 

“We didn’t set that. We didn’t make that clear.”

 

Counting continues in both seats and there will be an automatic recount by the AEC if there is a difference of fewer than 100 votes.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/history-making-wilson-wins-in-goldstein-hamer-hopes-in-kooyong-20250506-p5lx3a.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 7, 2025, 2:41 a.m. No.23002844   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7391 >>7424 >>2428 >>2474 >>2489 >>4096 >>7918 >>2123

>>22986131

>>22992823

Liberals revolt over policy failures as Sussan Ley is ‘pragmatic’ frontrunner for leader

 

SARAH ISON and JACK QUAIL - 6 May 2025

 

A raft of Liberal policies across ­environment, health, defence, tax and education were either not released or held back so long that they “barely saw the light of day”, insiders have revealed, as Sussan Ley emerges as the “pragmatic” frontrunner over Angus Taylor in the race to be the next leader.

 

Coalition insiders said policies worked on for years that would have laid out how the opposition would “halve” approval times for environmental projects and address the defence force’s personnel crisis were spiked by Peter Dutton’s office and Liberal HQ, while proposals in portfolios such as education were held up for months until it was almost too late to spruik them to voters.

 

“People in the policy unit or whatever you want to call it thought they knew better than everyone else,” one senior Liberal source said.

 

The Australian understands defence spokesman Andrew Hastie was effectively shut out of policy development in his portfolio by Mr Dutton, a former defence minister, who Liberal sources claim leaned instead on an Institute of Public Affairs policy blueprint funded by Gina Rinehart – a longtime detractor of Mr Hastie.

 

“Most decisions came from four or five people, Peter (Dutton), Angus (Taylor) and a few in the Senate, like (James) Paterson,” one Liberal MP said.

 

Tasmanian senator Jonathon Duniam on Tuesday became the latest Liberal to blast the handling of the election by the Coalition’s campaign headquarters.

 

“Many of us on the ground right across the country, (including) me here in Tasmania, saw some pretty alarming signs, which we fed in but were ignored,” Senator Duniam told Sky News.

 

Nationals Senate leader Bridget McKenzie said there were a range of issues that led to the “catastrophic loss”, including problems “around the campaign, research, communication, policy … tactics and strategy”.

 

Recriminations over the Coalition’s crushing loss come amid a growing battle for the Liberal leadership, with Ms Ley emerging as the key contender over Mr Taylor as several conservative MPs shifted support to her.

 

Mr Taylor’s detractors have unleashed an avalanche of criticism against the opposition Treasury spokesman in recent days, blaming him for the Coalition’s lacklustre economic agenda and perceived failure to take advantage of Labor’s management of the cost of living. On Tuesday, the criticism continued, with several Liberal MPs remarking Mr Taylor had a “very close” relationship to Mr Dutton, in an effort to link him to the deeply unpopular former Liberal leader.

 

“If Angus Taylor is the answer, I’m not sure what the question is,” one senior Liberal said. “If you can’t make a dent after 12 interest rate hikes and oppose (Labor’s’) tax cuts you should be disqualified from the Liberal leadership.”

 

Another Liberal source said: “Any Liberal treasurer that doesn’t support tax cuts is electoral poison”.

 

Outgoing Liberal senator Hollie Hughes said she had “concerns” about Mr Taylor’s capability, raising questions over what he had done for three years.

 

Backers of Ms Ley describe her as a pragmatic moderate willing to take on Labor when needed, ­arguing that her appointment as the Liberal Party’s first female leader could help win back disillusioned female voters and provide a harder target for Anthony Albanese, who often stresses the need to be more respectful of women.

 

Likely aiding Ms Ley’s leadership bid is Liberal moderate Tim Wilson’s expected victory in Goldstein. Liberal candidates in the former blue-ribbon seats of Kooyong and Bradfield, Amelia Hamer and Gisele Kapterian, are also expected to lend support to Ms Ley’s candidacy if they win.

 

While Liberal insiders said Ms Ley would have the numbers based on moderates and undecided members, several conservatives revealed they also believed she would be the best choice.

 

Dan Tehan’s name has also been floated, but many MPs said they didn’t believe he would get the leadership and needed to focus on holding Wannon, which he came so close to losing.

 

“The fact is, Angus (Taylor) would survive seven seconds, Dan Tehan one minute and Sussan Ley a few hours,” one Coalition MP said. “I don’t really think any of them are up for it, but Sussan is more than the others.”

 

Mr Taylor’s supporters have sought to distance him from Mr Dutton, pointing to his push to develop an income tax policy designed to eliminate bracket creep.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/liberals-revolt-over-policy-failures-as-sussan-ley-is-pragmatic-frontrunner-for-leader/news-story/dc1a803c336c790c8ea8c7b702b06713

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 7, 2025, 2:47 a.m. No.23002853   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2856 >>2123

>>22986131

Beware the landslide: Ardern’s lesson for victorious Albanese

 

OLIVER HARTWICH - 6 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Watching Australia’s 2025 federal election from Wellington gave me an uncanny sense of deja vu. As Labor swept to power with a commanding parliamentary majority and the Coalition suffered its worst defeat in generations, I could not help but think: “I have seen this movie before.”

 

New Zealand’s Labour Party swept to power in 2020 with the first single-party majority under our proportional representation system. Jacinda Ardern secured 50 per cent of the vote while ­National collapsed to 26 per cent – their worst result in decades.

 

Three years later, Labour was unceremoniously ejected.

 

How could fortunes reverse so dramatically? And what might this mean for Anthony Albanese’s triumphant Labor Party?

 

The Australian results mirror New Zealand’s 2020 election. Labor now commands nearly 90 seats in the 151-seat House of Representatives. The Coalition lies shattered, with Peter Dutton losing his seat. In Melbourne, Adelaide and Brisbane, Liberal representation has virtually disappeared, a blood-bath of historic proportions.

 

After such a victory, Labor’s strategists must feel the intoxicating pull of ambition. Why not seize this moment to fundamentally reshape Australia?

 

New Zealand’s experience offers a sobering answer.

 

Ardern’s government, drunk on its parliamentary majority, embarked on an ambitious agenda of structural reforms that nobody had actually voted for.

 

Consider their “Three Waters” program – a classic case of centralist overreach. Councils would be forced to relinquish control of water assets to new mega-entities with complex co-governance arrangements with Maori.

 

In reality, it exemplified bureaucratic empire-building and sparked nationwide backlash.

 

Or take Labour’s overhaul of the Resource Management Act – replacing New Zealand’s primary planning legislation. The ambition was breathtaking: simultaneously addressing housing, environment, infrastructure and climate change. By election time, this supposedly transformational reform had made a poorly performing regulatory system worse.

 

Meanwhile, Labour created a new centralised health bureaucracy that consumed billions while hospital waiting lists grew ever longer and health outcomes de­teriorated.

 

What do these initiatives share? They were ideologically motivated, bureaucratically complex, and failed to address everyday concerns of voters. While Labour restructured everything that moved, New Zealanders worried about immediate concerns. Inflation surged to 7.3 per cent. Mortgage rates doubled. Grocery prices soared.

 

How did Labour respond? Initially with denial. Then with token gestures – a temporary petrol tax cut here, a cost-of-living payment there. But these were all sticking plasters. By the time Chris Hipkins replaced Ardern in early 2023, promising to focus on “bread and butter” issues (and resulting in a bounce upwards for Labour in the opinion polls), the damage was done.

 

Does this sound familiar to Australian observers? It should.

 

Albanese’s government shows worrying signs of similar tendencies: grand ambitions for housing, sweeping climate targets, industrial relations reforms, and Indigenous recognition. No matter their individual justifications, taken together, these would be a recipe for overreach.

 

The fundamental lesson: landslide victories create a dangerous illusion. They suggest broad endorsement of a party’s entire agenda when they often simply reflect rejection of an unpalatable alternative. New Zealanders did not vote for Labour in 2020 because they wanted water infrastructure to get an extra dose of centralisation. They voted Labour because Ardern had created her own brand during the early phases of the pandemic, while National appeared divided.

 

Similarly, Australians did not vote Labor because they crave expansive government programs. They voted Labor because the Coalition had not offered much of substance.

 

Here lies the trap: mistaking rejection of your opponents for endorsement of your most ambitious plans.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 7, 2025, 2:48 a.m. No.23002856   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23002853

 

2/2

 

What should Albanese do? The answer is counter-intuitive: do less, but do it well. This means focusing on economic fundamentals. Addressing cost-of-living pressures with more than token gestures. Ensuring reforms are practical and deliver tangible benefits. Voters care more about outcomes than intentions.

 

Australia’s Coalition should take heart from New Zealand’s National Party, which demonstrated how swiftly political fortunes can reverse.

 

After their 2020 humiliation (and a later leadership change), National rallied behind Christopher Luxon and focused on issues affecting household budgets.

 

Their message was brutally simple: Labour failed to deliver; National offered more competent management. By election day 2023, that was enough to form a coalition government. Meanwhile, Labour lost nearly half its voters over just three years.

 

A few decades ago, such volatility would have been unheard of but we are witnessing a fundamental shift in democratic politics. The anchors that once secured political loyalty (think of church or trade union memberships) have dissolved. Today’s electorate swings more dramatically and forgives less readily.

 

Voters’ political promiscuousness creates a paradox: parliamentary dominance often contains the seeds of its own destruction. It breeds complacency, encourages overreach and sets impossible expectations.

 

Ardern discovered this too late. The question is: will ­Alba­nese learn from her experience?

 

History would suggest not. Politicians rarely believe others’ mistakes apply to them. Until suddenly, they do.

 

Perhaps the true lesson from across the Tasman runs even deeper. It shows that democracies, for all their flaws, have the ability to correct themselves.

 

No matter how overwhelming the majority, governments ultimately face the most effective constraint: the judgment of ordinary citizens, concerned more with results than rhetoric, willing to discard yesterday’s political ­heroes when the results do not match the promises.

 

That is both the frustration and glory of democracy – a lesson New Zealand’s Labour learned the hard way. Australia’s Labor Party might believe they are different. They are not.

 

Oliver Hartwich is executive director of The New Zealand Initiative.

 

https://www.nzinitiative.org.nz/

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/beware-the-landslide-arderns-lesson-for-victorious-albanese/news-story/91284623fc28c691dd7cf1884371477a

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 8, 2025, 2:12 a.m. No.23007391   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7394 >>2124

>>22986131

>>22992823

>>23002844

Ley gets backing from party elders as Liberal leadership battle grows hostile

 

David Crowe and Paul Sakkal - May 8, 2025

 

1/2

 

Liberal deputy leader Sussan Ley has won support from three former Liberal premiers in the quest to lead the party out of its sweeping defeat, with Jeff Kennett, Nick Greiner and Barry O’Farrell naming her as the best choice.

 

The former premiers went public with their support as another senior Liberal, former party president Shane Stone, also named Ley as the best leader to win back voters who deserted the party at the ballot box.

 

Others are throwing their support behind the shadow treasurer, Angus Taylor, in a contest that threatens ongoing stability by pitting conservatives against moderates in an increasingly hostile leadership battle, with files circulated highlighting rival weaknesses.

 

Kennett, who was premier of Victoria from 1992 to 1999, said the Liberals had a chance to rebuild within three years if they learnt the lessons from what he called the “amateurish” campaign to the federal election.

 

“I am not one of those who believe that the future for the party is lost or necessarily will take two elections before we are again a viable alternative,” he said. “I would very much endorse Sussan Ley coming in as the leader.

 

“Why do I say that? One, I like the fact that as deputy, she was a loyal deputy. Secondly, she has a great deal of parliamentary experience. She’s a very rounded person.

 

“My experience over life is that women are more consultative, they listen more, they think more than a lot of men.

 

“I’m not suggesting she should be the next leader because she’s female – I’m saying it’s because I think she’s the best person for the job.”

 

Greiner, who was premier of NSW from 1988 to 1992 and federal president of the Liberal Party from 2017 to 2020, said the key question for the party was whether it wanted to change in response to the verdict on Saturday.

 

Greiner said the party should set a course to be “warm and dry” on policy – that is, liberal on social issues and conservative on economic issues – and needed a leader who could enact change.

 

“I do think that Sussan is the change candidate,” he said. “I think that in the future the party needs to be liberal, sticking to its values, and it needs to be sensible, and it needs to be in the centre.

 

“The notion that you can get anywhere by not being sensible and centric is, I think, pretty bizarre.”

 

O’Farrell, who was premier of NSW from 2011 to 2014, said the two main parties tended to move to their opposite extremes in times of defeat but had to learn from this mistake.

 

“When they lose, Labor goes left. When we lose, we go right,” he said. “And guess what – we only ever win when we’re back in the centre. It’s a really easy thing to plot over the years.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 8, 2025, 2:13 a.m. No.23007394   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23007391

 

2/2

 

O’Farrell said it would be wrong to write off the Liberal Party, but he said it had to win back the community it wanted to serve. “If I was in the room, I’d be putting my hand up for Sussan,” he said.

 

Stone, who was chief minister of the Northern Territory from 1995 to 1999 and president of the Liberal Party from 1999 to 2005, said Ley was the best choice to lead a “rebound” for the party.

 

“I think there is a great opportunity here. Whether it can be achieved in one term or two will depend on a lot of unknowns,” he said.

 

Stone said the Country Liberal Party had fallen to as low as two members in the NT parliament but had won the territory election last year.

 

“If I was a young person of a conservative bent and wanted a parliamentary career, now is the time to get involved because a number of these Labor members will be oncers,” he said, using a term for MPs who last only one term.

 

“It always works out that way. I think Sussan Ley has had a very good parliamentary career and I would have liked to have seen more of her in the campaign.

 

“I think that she’s a standout. I stand firmly with her, but I don’t have a vote on this.”

 

Hopes of a potential deal to avert a Liberal leadership contest were extinguished on Wednesday as the contest turned into a mudslinging war. Dutton, who returned to Canberra on Wednesday to thank his staff, will not be involved in the leadership contest.

 

Taylor’s troops on the right flank of the party fought back against public and private criticism of him since election day by sending out documents highlighting Ley’s gaffes and lack of policy in the women’s portfolio she held last term.

 

Earlier in the week, Ley’s supporters were distributing a file highlighting Taylor’s policy record and casting him as opposed to climate action.

 

The race between the two is tight, and both sides are fighting hard for the backing of the third contender, Dan Tehan, who is mulling a run as deputy.

 

Taylor has been telling MPs he was “handcuffed” on economic policy by Dutton and his office, while Ley has been phoning colleagues claiming she will “reform the party”, democratise policy development and boost female representation. A party room meeting to decide a new leader is expected next week.

 

The document Ley’s enemies circulated criticised her over reports in this masthead stating she had offered frontbench roles for MPs such as Jason Wood and Scott Buchholz. Her factional ally Alex Hawke has been offered the defence portfolio, one MP said.

 

On Wednesday night, a graphics-heavy check list was circulated by Taylor’s supporters contrasting the shadow treasurer’s support for Israel and fundraising ability with Ley’s, while noting her 2017 Gold Coast expenses scandal, lack of international experience and the swing against her in her seat.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/ley-gets-backing-from-party-elders-as-liberal-leadership-battle-grows-hostile-20250507-p5lxbq.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 8, 2025, 2:39 a.m. No.23007424   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7430 >>2428 >>2474 >>2489 >>4096 >>4135 >>2025 >>2124

>>22986131

>>22992823

>>23002844

Jacinta Price defects to Liberals to run as Taylor’s deputy in leadership bid

 

Paul Sakkal - May 8, 2025

 

1/2

 

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price will run as shadow treasurer Angus Taylor’s deputy in the battle for the Liberal Party leadership against Sussan Ley, after her shock defection from the National Party on Thursday afternoon.

 

The move has effectively blown apart the Coalition, angering Liberal moderates hoping current deputy leader Sussan Ley would replace Peter Dutton as opposition leader and devastating the National Party.

 

Price only phoned Littleproud as she released a statement announcing her move, according to two sources familiar with Price who were unauthorised to speak publicly. The late call was designed to head off any attempt by Littleproud to thwart the switch.

 

As a member of the Country Liberal Party, the Northern Territory’s merged division of the Coalition, she can sit in either the National or Liberal party rooms in Canberra, but it is unclear if the CLP itself gets to decide where Price sits.

 

The move gives Price a vote in the tight contest between Taylor and Ley, which one Liberal MP supporting Ley described as a “desperate branch stack” and a “hostile takeover by the National Party”.

 

Sources close to Taylor, unable to speak publicly, said Price may run as Taylor’s deputy when the party room meets on Tuesday to elect a new leader. The shadow treasurer’s camp believes her star power in the party room and with the base will make Taylor’s ticket hard to resist.

 

Former prime minister Tony Abbott played a key role convincing Price to move. The senator, who is hugely popular among conservatives, had been interested in joining the Liberal Party last term. She has also been courted by Liberals to run for a lower house seat, but that is not on the cards immediately.

 

In Price’s statement, she said she had not made the decision lightly but wanted to help rebuild the Liberal Party after its worst loss in its history.

 

“I am deeply appreciative of the opportunities the National Party under David Littleproud’s leadership has given me, most notably the responsibility of leading the No campaign in the Voice referendum,” she said in a statement.

 

“I am eager to fight for the best interests of all Australians as part of the Coalition. I do however feel the Liberal Party is my natural home.”

 

Signalling that she would not back away from culture wars, she said: “Let this be the moment we stop whispering our values and start declaring them again, not as fringe ideas, but as the foundation on which this country was built.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 8, 2025, 2:42 a.m. No.23007430   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23007424

 

2/2

 

The National Party lost its deputy leader Perin Davey at the election, meaning the party has only four senators after Price’s defection and is in danger of losing its party status, which requires five upper house members. This has implications for funding and staff allocation.

 

Littleproud released a statement hours after Price’s move, saying he was “disappointed”.

 

“The Nationals negotiated an extra position in shadow cabinet before the election, to give Senator Nampijinpa Price a promotion and Shadow Ministerial opportunity,” he said.

 

“The Nationals were the first to lead the ‘No’ case in relation to the Voice, backing Senator Nampijinpa Price early and before anyone else did. I appreciate Senator Nampijinpa Price has ambition that extends beyond the possibilities of the Nationals and I wish her well.”

 

The race between Taylor and Ley had already descended into acrimony as both sides released files of compromising information about each other.

 

Taylor released a statement late Thursday saying: “I’m delighted by the news that Jacinta Nampijinpa Price will join the Liberal Party.”

 

A key backer of Taylor, senator James Paterson, celebrated Price’s move on Instagram, saying he was “delighted”.

 

“Welcome home Jacinta!” he said.

 

Price is rated as one of the most popular MPs in parliament, according to this masthead’s Resolve Political Monitor. But questions have already been raised about her mainstream appeal after she echoed Donald Trump’s talking points during the campaign and photos emerged of her in a MAGA cap.

 

“She is Temu Trump in a skirt and electoral poison,” one moderate MP said.

 

One of her backers acknowledged she had flaws and needed to be tamed, but argued she had the firepower the party needed.

 

“There’s no one more popular among the party members and few who can take the fight up to Labor like her,” the right-wing MP said.

 

Her shift also adds to pressure on Littleproud, whose own position as leader will be decided in a National Party meeting on Monday. Littleproud’s position is expected to be safe but some allies of Barnaby Joyce want him to stand aside.

 

“David Littleproud should step down from the leadership and accept some of the responsibility,” Nationals MP Colin Boyce told this masthead.

 

“He was part of the leadership team that got us to where we are.”

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/jacinta-price-to-defect-to-liberals-to-join-angus-taylor-s-leadership-team-20250508-p5lxon.html

 

https://x.com/AngusTaylorMP/status/1920375545289977946

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/DJYVvZUzyLy/

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 8, 2025, 2:49 a.m. No.23007443   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7446 >>0102 >>4121 >>2125

>>22986131

Ed Husic, Mark Dreyfus axed in factional power play as Albanese prepares new ministry

 

Paul Sakkal and David Crowe - May 8, 2025

 

1/2

 

Labor faction leaders have cut down two cabinet ministers in a brutal display of caucus power, forcing out Industry Minister Ed Husic and Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and sparking anger from MPs at the “chaos and disunity” days after the federal election.

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has accepted the outcome despite promising stability at the election, but caucus members were dismayed at the way the faction leaders forced the issue, with the Right faction deciding it would not support two of its most senior members.

 

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, the most senior member of the Right, led a push from Victorian colleagues to gain more sway at the top of the government and promote younger members aligned with his faction.

 

The moves triggered anger from NSW Right MPs at Marles and his loyalists over the shock changes, which they said compromised the unity and stability of the government in the first days of its second term.

 

“How do we explain this to the public? It looks like chaos and disunity to knife two ministers whose performance has never been in question,” one NSW MP said.

 

The fiery meeting of the national Right was repeatedly delayed on Thursday afternoon as deals were hashed out, and several MPs spoke out against the plan to remove Dreyfus and Husic.

 

Another member of the Right, western Sydney MP Mike Freelander, said the outcome “beggars belief” because of the quality of the two ministers, praising Dreyfus in particular.

 

“It’s disgraceful, it’s stupid and it’s wrong,” he told this masthead.

 

“It’s an ill wind that blows through this place – two highly-performing ministers being replaced by union hacks.”

 

Dreyfus delivered on a key election pledge on integrity in the last term of parliament by setting up the National Anti-Corruption Commission, while Husic set up the $15 billion National Reconstruction Fund to invest in local industry.

 

The changes are expected to help two Victorian MPs, Sam Rae and Daniel Mulino, gain executive positions. A third member of the faction, Victorian senator Raff Ciccone, was also being named as a potential addition to a role.

 

Labor’s internal power groupings have been in intense talks since the election to carve up the 30 cabinet positions in line with party rules that give factions ministries in line with their numbers in parliament, with the Left’s success on Saturday entitling it to an extra spot.

 

This meant that Marles’ group and the Victorian shop workers’ union are underrepresented in cabinet while former leader Bill Shorten’s old Australian Workers’ Union sub-faction, which includes Dreyfus and Housing Minister Clare O’Neil, has too many ministers.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 8, 2025, 2:51 a.m. No.23007446   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23007443

 

2/2

 

Dreyfus, 68, phoned colleagues over the past two days to shore up his position and ensure he had enough votes to cling on, according to several federal Labor sources unable to speak publicly.

 

The attorney-general, who entered parliament in 2007, had faced internal calls before the election to vacate his Melbourne seat of Isaacs in the name of renewal. His office was contacted for comment.

 

Dreyfus was informed formally of the move against him after the Right faction agreed to dump him in Thursday morning meetings between party powerbrokers in Canberra.

 

Mulino and Rae have been formally nominated by the Victorian Right to replace Dreyfus in the ministry if Marles gets his way and forces Dreyfus to stand aside. Right faction cabinet spots are decided state by state.

 

Rae, 38, was one of the youngest-ever PwC partners, led two state election wins as Victorian Labor state secretary, and secured a primary vote swing in his outer-suburban Melbourne seat of Hawke that was targeted by the Coalition.

 

Albanese, who was re-elected with a thumping mandate, had the option of using his authority to seek to protect ministers, but the factional numbers were against Dreyfus and Husic.

 

After the Left won numerous new seats in the election, Senator Tim Ayres, a close ally of Albanese and factional heavyweight who was once a manufacturing union leader, was expected to rise to cabinet.

 

Victorian senator Jess Walsh, an economist and former union official, was in line to gain a ministerial position. Other contenders include incoming Tasmanian MP Rebecca White, a former state Labor opposition leader, and Victorian MP Ged Kearney, a former president of the ACTU.

 

One senior Labor source said of the manoeuvring: “They’re killing the only Muslim in cabinet [Husic] and the most pro-Israel cabinet minister [Dreyfus].”

 

Dreyfus is a widower and the source said that could make it less attractive for him to take up a diplomatic posting, which other MPs have received as encouragement to leave in the past. There had also been speculation in previous years that Dreyfus may join the judiciary.

 

Labor MPs are in Canberra for a full caucus meeting on Friday after factional meetings on Thursday.

 

Albanese was tight-lipped about the reshuffle that will act as an early test of his internal authority.

 

“We have a process and we’ll work it through,” he said on Sky News on Wednesday.

 

“The important thing is … for most of the 125 years since Federation, we’ve sat at the other end of the corridor in the old place, in the opposition party room.”

 

“Government brings with it responsibility, and no individual is greater than the collective – that includes myself.”

 

This masthead reported in February that Albanese overruled Dreyfus after the attorney-general expressed reservations about legislating mandatory minimum jail terms for hate crimes.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/dreyfus-told-he-will-be-dumped-heaping-pressure-on-pm-to-save-him-20250508-p5lxly.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 8, 2025, 3:06 a.m. No.23007460   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7462 >>5918 >>2125

>>22986131

>>22998096

>>23002826

Defeated Adam Bandt likens climate change to ‘invasion’ as Peter Dutton cites voter ‘disgust’ at Greens

 

ALEXI DEMETRIADI - 8 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Former Greens leader Christine Milne has warned her devastated party it needs to focus on core green issues if it is to be effective in the new parliament, as a vanquished Adam Bandt called on the left to treat climate change like an “invasion”.

 

Mr Bandt’s concession of defeat in the seat of Melbourne leaves his deputy, Mehreen Faruqi, and senators Larissa Waters and Sarah Hanson-Young jostling ahead of a leadership vote to lead a party left with only one lower-house member.

 

Mr Bandt lashed the major parties on Thursday, calling for climate change to be treated like a “war” and blamed “One Nation and Liberal preferences” for his defeat as Labor’s campaign machine celebrated its second party leader scalp.

 

Also on Thursday, Peter Dutton cited rejection of anti-Semitism as a reason for Mr Bandt losing the seat of Melbourne to Labor’s Sarah Witty, who is a foster carer and is chief executive of the Nappy Collective, a charity providing nappies to needy families.

 

“No spin by Adam Bandt can change the reality that he, and other Green members, lost their seats because of their appalling treatment of the Jewish community,” the former Liberal opposition leader tweeted on Thursday afternoon.

 

“Australians were rightly disgusted at their behaviour.

 

“We were proud to preference the Greens last, helping to ensure Adam Bandt’s loss.”

 

During Mr Bandt’s concession speech on Thursday, he blamed Mr Dutton as a reason why the Greens have lost seats, saying many Australians had voted Labor as the “best option to stop Dutton’’.

 

“People in Melbourne hate Peter Dutton with a very good reason,” Mr Bandt said.

 

“They have seen his brand of toxic racism on display for many years, seen his time as immigration minister, seen him make comments about Melbourne and like many, many of them wanted him as far away from power as possible.”

 

Mr Bandt clarified that while Mr Dutton was not the sole reason for the shift away from the Greens in seats, he still made an impact on vote numbers.

 

Ms Milne’s intervention comes after fellow former Greens leader Bob Brown blamed the media and major parties for “vilifying” Mr Bandt, accusing Anthony Albanese of having the “grace of a ­cockroach” over his reaction to the Greens’ seat losses.

 

Mr Brown also raised whether the left-wing party should start running open tickets to deny Labor the preferences that have got it over the line in some electorates.

 

The party’s parliamentary members will elect new leadership in a party-room meeting next week, with Senator Faruqi a likely frontrunner, but amid support for senators Waters, Jordon Steele-John, and Hanson-Young.

 

Ms Milne, a pioneering Greens politician who led the party federally from 2012 to 2015, said Mr Bandt’s loss was “devastating” and party’s lower house near wipe-out “disappointing”.

 

However, she said the party retained a high Senate vote, and that Greens senators should use their balance of power “to secure significant climate and environment policy”.

 

“But to get it, they will have to focus on the planetary crisis playing out right around the country: the logging, the landclearing, the new fossil fuel projects,” she said.

 

The party should focus on “the failure of the Labor Party to address … in any meaningful way or to deliver the comprehensive new environment laws that were promised”.

 

Some may interpret her comments as seeking to return the party to his environmental roots, after an election marked in part by Mr Bandt’s focus on the Israel-Hamas conflict.

 

However, Ms Milne said she backed the party’s stance and did not believe it was anti-Semitic.

 

“The Greens have always stood up for human rights and international law from the Tampa, to the Iraq war and Gaza,” she said.

 

“We have never and will never tolerate genocide or anti-Semitism. It is appalling to me that so many are turning a blind eye. I am proud the Greens have taken the stand they have.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 8, 2025, 3:07 a.m. No.23007462   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23007460

 

2/2

 

Ms Milne, who was part of the landmark Labor-Greens alliance in the Tasmanian parliament in 1989, also called for a broader rethink within the green movement.

 

“The climate and environment movement will also need to rethink and take on the Labor government, instead of turning a deliberate blind eye to new coal and gas projects and always calling on the Greens to ‘just pass it’,” she said, accusing Mr Albanese of Trump-like arrogance.

 

“Prime Minister ‘get out of the way’ Albanese is demonstrating extraordinary arrogance for someone whose party secured 34 per cent of the primary vote.

 

“The Australian people rejected Trumpism. They did not vote for authoritarianism or steady as she goes.”

 

On Thursday, Mr Bandt – who held the seat of Melbourne for 15 years – called in his concession speech on the media to stop reporting on climate change as a “political issue” and view it as if “our country is being invaded”, warning that the nation faced a “hellish future in their lifetimes if we don’t get the climate crisis under control”.

 

“You should treat the climate crisis as if there is a war on,” he said.

 

“One of the refrains was that we don’t hear people talk about climate as much anymore, during the course of this parliament,’’ Mr Bandt said.

 

“We were knocking on (the media’s) door trying to get you to write stories about it, we were asking questions about it in parliament, we were holding press conferences about it and we really struggled to get anyone to take that seriously.”

 

Mr Brown meanwhile took aim at the “big parties” for demonising the outgoing leader.

 

“It (Mr Bandt’s defeat) is because of the targeted negative and false campaigning against the Greens … and the Greens are going to have to, in the future, work out how to respond to that,” Mr Brown said.

 

“The Greens are absolutely essential on climate change and protecting the environment, and this is going to be a period of onslaught of both.”

 

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim said the Greens had pursued “ever more radical causes that were remote from the central concerns of mainstream Australians, and alien to their values”, urging it to use defeat as an “opportunity”.

 

“They now have the chance to reorient themselves away from the pet causes of the far left and move towards the political centre,” he said.

 

“The ignorant moralising arrogance, the ludicrous oversimplification of complex issues, and the ferocious demonisation of those with different views all need to stop.”

 

Zionist Federation of Australian president Jeremy Leibler said Australian voters had “utterly rejected a party that thrives off division with no solutions”.

 

The Greens’ new leadership will be determined by a party-room meeting next week with Senator Nick McKim acting in a caretaker role in the interim.

 

Elizabeth Watson-Brown looked set to retain the Brisbane seat of Ryan for the Greens and become its only lower-house member.

 

Despite initially denying she was canvassing votes, Senator Faruqi, of NSW, and her backers have gauged support for the deputy’s promotion, and she would be a – if not the – frontrunner.

 

Senator Waters, of Queensland, Senator Steele-John, of Western Australia, and Senator Hanson-Young, of South Australia, are believed also in the mix.

 

Senator Waters could modernise and professionalise the party’s image to non-member voters, some sources said.

 

Others mused whether a co-leadership situation, not dissimilar to the British Greens, could be an option to take the party forward with at least one of those coming from a senator representing Australia’s three mainland eastern states.

 

However, sources said the party was stuck in a bind, given its membership backed the radical-left politics that the wider public repudiated, adding that any moderation of the party would turn away its new, younger base.

 

They said Senator Faruqi would likely win any leadership vote but whose politics was the “exact type” that got rejected at Saturday’s election.

 

With 81.6 per cent of possible votes counted, according to the Australian Electoral Commission the Greens’ national House of Representatives share was down 0.51 percentage points from 2022 at 11.74 per cent.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/too-early-to-concede-too-soon-to-predict-future-as-greens-mull-future-without-adam-bandt/news-story/c93b1dddc9591f373ff3cc239cd1b5c1

 

https://x.com/PeterDutton_MP/status/1920362929402360262

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 8, 2025, 3:13 a.m. No.23007467   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2508 >>2055 >>5815 >>5059 >>2266

>>22986131

>>22989198

>>22998144

OPINION: A pragmatic China policy can provide Australia the certainty it seeks

 

Global Times - May 07, 2025

 

Recently, discussions within Australia have intensified regarding the trajectory of China-Australia relations, as various voices attempted to offer "road maps" for the direction the Anthony Albanese administration should take. Last week, the Australian Labor Party secured a decisive victory in the federal election, with Albanese becoming the first Australian leader in 21 years to be re-elected. Consequently, the state of China-Australia relations under Albanese 2.0 has become a focal point of public discourse.

 

For instance, a Lowy Institute article on Wednesday suggested that Canberra should "speak up" about Beijing's "human rights issues." Similarly, the infamous Australian Strategic Policy Institute continues its anti-China agenda by labeling China "the most active state engaged in hybrid threats targeting Australia." These perspectives underscore a segment of Australian discourse that views China through a confrontational lens and aims to increase suspicion and hostility toward the country.

 

Chen Hong, a professor and director of the Australian Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times that these narratives are clearly aimed at complicating the bilateral relationship. It is essential for the Australian government to remain vigilant against such attempts to sow discord.

 

Under the Albanese administration, the strained China-Australia relationship has been repaired to a certain extent. Albanese repeatedly emphasized that China is an important trading partner for Australia and highlighted the significance of developing bilateral relations. His administration adopted a strategy that contributed to stabilizing ties, resulting in the resumption of high-level dialogues and a gradual easing of trade tensions between the two countries.

 

Chen added that he is positive that Albanese 2.0 will witness the China-Australia relationship maintaining its current stability. Canberra will likely work hard to promote Australia's interests. "Especially in a world filled with growing uncertainty, Australia wants to create more certainty by itself, rather than sitting back and waiting for external uncertainty to wreak havoc on Australia's policy, or even change it," he said.

 

Today, China-Australia relations remain in a gradual process of rebuilding and restoring trust. This progress should not be taken for granted. Of course, there are differences between China and Australia, but the key lies in how those differences are managed. Those divergences should not overshadow the cooperative aspects of the bilateral ties. There is still significant potential for cooperation between the two countries. Their economies are highly complementary, and there are major opportunities for collaboration in emerging fields, such as renewable energy, the digital economy and artificial intelligence. In addition, ties in education, tourism and cultural exchange continue to grow stronger.

 

At a time when the global economy is slowing and geopolitical tensions are rising, China and Australia - both major players in the Asia-Pacific - should continue to choose the path of dialogue and cooperation. A sustained pragmatic and rational approach to China under Albanese 2.0 will help take the bilateral relationship to a new level of mutually beneficial cooperation, which would not only serve both countries' interests but also support stability and development in the region. Experience in recent years has shown that blindly following Washington's lead and treating China as a strategic adversary has harmed Australia's diplomatic independence and dealt real blows to its economy. Learning from those lessons and continuing to pursue a pragmatic and balanced China policy is the right strategic path for Australia.

 

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202505/1333542.shtml

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 5:38 a.m. No.23012385   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2408 >>5675 >>3629 >>3647 >>8414 >>2182

American Robert Francis Prevost elected Pope Leo XIV

 

JACQUELIN MAGNAY - 9 May 2025

 

The new leader of the Catholic Church is the American cardinal Robert Prevost, who has taken the papal name Leo XIV.

 

Pope Leo XIV, the first American pope, emerged on the balcony overlooking St Peter’s Square early this morning Australian time to huge cheers and prolonging applause from the tens of thousands of people who stampeded into the area once the bells tolled and white smoke billowed from the Sistine Chapel on day two of voting.

 

Amid wild excitement and cheers of “Abbiamo Papa, ole, ole, ole” Leo XIV emerged about an hour later quietly raising his hands and waving with both arms. He appeared to choke up when the crowd responded with chants of ‘Viva il Papa’.

 

The new pope is a 69-year-old dual citizen, originally from Chicago, who took Peruvian citizenship after serving in that country for several decades.

 

Most recently he has been the head of the church’s Dicastery for Bishops overseeing the selection of new bishops.

 

Pope Leo XIV is not without controversy however. He was previously criticised for not doing enough within the church to deal with historic sexual assault allegations, although he had referred the complaints to the police.

 

Leo XIV is considered a compromise candidate, and a centrist embracing a pastoral role not unlike Francis. However he opposes ordaining women as deacons and on other issues of church doctrine is somewhat conservative.

 

Tim Costelloe, the Archbishop of Perth, was among the first to congratulate the new pope.

 

“The election of Cardinal Robert Prevost as Pope Leo XIV is yet again a sign of the wisdom behind the Italian saying that ‘those who enter the conclave as a pope inevitably emerge from the conclave as a cardinal’,” the archbishop said in a statement.

 

“Cardinal Prevost brought to his most recent role as Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops an approachability and willingness to listen which were no doubt developed throughout his many years as an Augustinian missionary in Peru.

 

“He will be warmly welcomed by the Church in Latin America, as Pope Francis was, by the Church in the United States from where he comes, from the English-speaking world as a native English speaker, and from the whole Church as a man of God steeped in the rich spirituality of his Augustinian Religious Order.

 

“As Pope Leo XIV, our new pope will bring the benefit of his wide experience to the many challenges and opportunities before him.”

 

In a social media post, US President Donald Trump hailed the election of Pope Leo XIV as a “great honour” for the country and said he looked forward to meeting.

 

“Congratulations to Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost, who was just named Pope. It is such an honor to realise that he is the first American Pope. What excitement, and what a Great Honor for our Country,” Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social network.

 

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney was another leader to congratulate Pope Leo XIV on his election.

 

“At a time of profound global challenges, may his pontificate be marked by wisdom, discernment, a deep commitment to common good, and dignity of all,” Mr Carney said.

 

When the six bells of St Peter’s Basilica, including the rarely used majestic “Il Campanone” began to ring in loud symphony confirming the colour of the smoke - it was initially difficult to determine the colour - people began rushing into St Peter’s Square.

 

The historical significance of the moment is not lost on the Italian locals and Catholic faithful.

 

There have been just 10 of these occasions in the past 100 years: the elections of Pope Francis, Benedict XVI, John Paul II, John Paul I, Paul VI, John XXIII, Pius XII, Pius XI, and Benedict XV.

 

Adopting a papal name has been a tradition going back to the sixth century when Cardinal Roman Mercurius wanted a religious and not pagan name, selecting John II. The practice became more common from the 11th century.

 

It then became a trend to adopt the name of the Pope who created them as cardinal. More recently the papal name indicates the direction the new leader wants to take the church.

 

The excitement of the crowd was palpable.

 

Nuns and priests joining with thousands of tourists running with mobile phones aloft down the myriad streets leading into Vatican City to capture the pictures of the smoke shown on various big screens.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/white-smoke-signals-new-pope-elected-at-the-vatican/news-story/e22d2be48235eea0507123b57261b6a1

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZW-nYhIgFtw

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 5:49 a.m. No.23012408   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5675 >>3629 >>3647 >>2183

>>22986131

>>23012385

PM congratulates incoming Pope Leo XIV, invites him to Australia

 

Anthony Albanese has already asked the new pope to keep a date open in 2028, only hours after the pontiff’s election.

 

Joseph Olbrycht-Palmer - May 9, 2025

 

Anthony Albanese has congratulated Pope Leo XIV and invited the new pontiff to Australia in three years’ time.

 

Robert Prevost, 69, was announced as the 267th leader of the Catholic Church on Thursday (local time) after the Conclave deliberated for two days — one of the shortest papal elections in history.

 

The first American pope, he was introduced as Leo XIV to the tens of thousands gathered in St Peter’s Square.

 

The Prime Minister said on Friday the new pope’s “leadership comes at an important time for the Catholic Church and for the world”.

 

“I will invite His Holiness Pope Leo to Australia for the International Eucharistic Congress which is being proudly hosted in 2028,” Mr Albanese told reporters at Parliament House.

 

“And I’ve had discussions with Archbishop Anthony Fisher of Sydney, who of course I know very well, about the importance of Australia hosting that very significant event in just a few years’ time.

 

“And I know that the Church here in Australia is very excited to have this privilege and honour.”

 

He said his “government looks forward to continuing Australia’s strong relationship with the Holy See under Pope Leo XIV’s pontificate”.

 

Seen as a moderate, Pope Leo was in 2023 promoted to cardinal by his predecessor, the late Pope Francis.

 

Before his arrival in the Vatican two years ago, he had spent much of his life as a missionary in Peru and holds dual US-Peruvian citizenship.

 

He has been praised for his work in the South American country, but often shunned the limelight, keeping a low profile even after arriving in the Catholic Church’s centre of power.

 

The late Pope Francis promoted his successor again earlier this year.

 

“This is a moment which will bring joy and hope to Catholics everywhere,” Mr Albanese said.

 

“May the Papacy of Pope Leo advance the cause of peace and social justice for all humanity.”

 

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/pm-congratulates-incoming-pope-leo-xiv-invites-him-to-australia/news-story/cbd5e0fd901f5a2056337702cf4be895

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HYzOzdJTCgQ

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 5:58 a.m. No.23012428   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2450 >>2125

>>22986131

>>23002844

>>23007424

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s defection kills off any potential Taylor-Ley leadership peace deal

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS and RHIANNON DOWN - May 08, 2025

 

1/2

 

A bloody civil war threatens to engulf the federal Liberal Party beyond next Tuesday’s vote to replace Peter Dutton, after Angus Taylor orchestrated the high-profile defection of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from the Nationals to bolster his numbers.

 

The Australian can reveal efforts to broker a peace deal between Acting Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and Mr Taylor have been abandoned, with Liberal MPs fearing a tight vote would split the party and undermine the authority of the winning candidate.

 

Ahead of a Tuesday showdown in Canberra next week, the fight between Ms Ley and Mr Taylor turned ugly as Senator Price quit the Nationals and Liberals conceded that toxic factional NSW Liberal Party brawling had now been transplanted into the federal parliamentary team.

 

Mr Taylor’s move to recruit Senator Price triggered anger from senior Nationals, including Matt Canavan, who compared his former colleague with Lidia Thorpe.

 

The Nationals could now lose its major party status in the Senate after Senator Price’s defection and Nationals deputy leader Perin Davey’s failure to win re-election. The party’s numbers in the upper house will now shrink to four.

 

The Australian understands Senator Price did not consult with Nationals colleagues before she quit.

 

Senior Liberal MPs backing Ms Ley and Mr Taylor on Thursday claimed to have at least 20-plus votes, including candidates and MPs subject to close vote counts in battleground seats, and senators on track to lose their spots or whose terms expire on June 30.

 

The Australian understands Mr Taylor is ahead of Ms Ley in the race to secure the votes of key frontbenchers Dan Tehan and Jane Hume.

 

Senator Hume, who as opposition finance spokeswoman worked closely with Mr Taylor ahead of the election, was earlier this year endorsed as the head of the federal Liberal moderates faction following Simon Birmingham’s retirement.

 

It would be a major blow for the moderates if their nominated leader sided with the conservatives.

 

Both camps on Thursday could not categorically claim the support of Senator Hume, who is understood to be frustrated about internal attacks targeting her role around the abandoned working from home crackdown and “Chinese spies” comments.

 

Some Liberal MPs said they believed Ms Ley and Mr Taylor both presented poor options for the party, given their prominent roles ahead of last weekend’s historic election defeat to Labor.

 

Ms Ley’s supporters have promoted the need for the party to have stronger female representation, criticised Mr Taylor’s failure to cut-through on economic policies and pledged to make the party more mainstream in the face of rising challenges in traditionally safe Coalition seats from Labor and Climate 200-backed Teals.

 

Supporters of Mr Taylor warned say that depending on the final make-up of the federal parliamentary team when some Senators’ terms expire, they could challenge Ms Ley if she falls over the line in the vote next week.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 6:02 a.m. No.23012450   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23012428

 

2/2

 

While Mr Tehan, Ted O’Brien and other names have been floated as deputy leader candidates, Liberal sources said Senator Price could nominate for the position following her defection.

 

Senator Price said she believed she could be “more effective” in the Liberal party room, which she believed was her “natural home”.

 

The 43-year-old said she had not taken the decision to defect “lightly”.

 

“I want to bring back our core values of liberty, individual freedom and responsibility, the rule of law, free market and economic prosperity, minimal government intervention, a fair go and, most of all, love for our nation, Australia,” Senator Price said.

 

“The future of this nation is not built by living in the past. We learn from our history. We don’t repeat our mistakes, but we grow stronger and move forward. That is the Australian way.”

 

Senior Nationals sources described Senator Price’s move as the “ultimate betrayal” and accused her of failing to follow proper processes in choosing to switch partyrooms.

 

Senator Canavan said “this act makes Jacinta the Lidia Thorpe of the Liberal Party … she has switched teams after being elected – in fact, she hasn’t been elected yet, the votes are still being counted – and she has switched to ­another side”.

 

“That disenfranchises the voters, disappoints members, and is a slap in the face to her friends and colleagues who have supported her,” he said. “Jacinta has been elected with the use of National Party funds, the National Party’s efforts.”

 

Nationals leader David Littleproud said he was “disappointed” at her defection. He said the Country Liberal Party senator had “ambitions that extend beyond the possibilities” of the regional party.

 

“The Nationals negotiated an extra position in shadow cabinet before the election, to give Senator Nampijinpa Price a promotion and shadow ministerial opportunity,” Mr Littleproud said.

 

“The Nationals were the first to lead the ‘No’ case in relation to the voice, backing Senator Nampijinpa Price early and before anyone else did.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/jacinta-nampijinpa-prices-defection-kills-off-any-potential-taylorley-leadership-peace-deal/news-story/7aabb5c77e278ca9087da668d4bf5a96

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 6:10 a.m. No.23012474   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2476 >>2129

>>22986131

>>23002844

>>23007424

NT Nationals weigh retribution against Price for defection to Liberals

 

Paul Sakkal and Olivia Ireland - May 9, 2025

 

1/2

 

Both Coalition parties have been plunged into open warfare by conservative senator Matt Canavan’s challenge for the Nationals leadership and party officials weighing up dropping Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from their Senate ticket for defecting to the Liberals to support Angus Taylor.

 

Canavan’s unlikely push to oust David Littleproud means the Nationals and Liberals will hold leadership duels on Monday and Tuesday, respectively, after Taylor and Sussan Ley on Friday declared their candidacy for the Liberal role.

 

Price’s move from the Nationals to the Liberals has ramifications for both leadership contests and could reduce the salary and office entitlements of at least one Nationals senator, infuriating her colleagues.

 

According to parliamentary rules, parties need at least five senators to have a party whip – who is responsible for party discipline, paid more and has a larger office – but Price’s departure combined with Nationals senator Perrin Davey’s loss in the election takes the party to four.

 

Price, the popular but controversial Indigenous senator, declared on Thursday she would shift to the Liberal Party and is expected to run as Taylor’s deputy.

 

Four Coalition sources, unable to speak publicly about internal party workings, said the Country Liberal Party, which Price represents in the Northern Territory, was considering whether to disendorse Price or opt not to pick her as a candidate at the next election.

 

Price, who was contacted for comment about the threats, defended her defection to the Liberal Party in a radio interview on Friday, rejecting claims she had moved to further her ambition.

 

“I wanted to do it in a respectful way, so I did speak to my colleagues,” she said.

 

“[Being part of the Liberal Party] is something that I wanted to do from the first time I was elected,” she told 2GB. “I’ve been welcomed by Sussan Ley to the Liberal Party room, which I’m very grateful for.”

 

Price was coy about whether she would run for a leadership position but said that former prime minister Tony Abbott had supported her move to the Liberals. “Tony has long supported me,” Price said.

 

However, Nigel Scullion, a CLP senator for nearly 20 years until the 2019 election, cautioned against drastic action, saying Price’s action was “not the end of the world” because she remained a CLP member of parliament regardless of which party she sat with in Canberra.

 

Former CLP president Shane Stone said the defection “left a sour taste” in his mouth. “She’s had tremendous support from the National Party,” Stone said, pointing out that Littleproud secured her a portfolio to which the party was not entitled.

 

The injection of Price into the Liberal leadership contest has inflamed an already bitter battle that threatens ongoing party unity, regardless of the winner.

 

Ley claimed Price, who vowed to “make Australia great again” during the campaign, joining Taylor’s ticket had worked against the shadow treasurer because uncommitted MPs were not attracted to the idea of the senator taking on such a senior role.

 

The race is tight, however, and Taylor’s backers hoped Price’s popularity among Liberal branch members would make it harder for MPs to vote against him after trade spokesman Dan Tehan ruled himself out of the leadership race on Friday. “I love the Liberal Party … and I will work hard and serve in whatever capacity I am asked to rebuild our party,” Tehan said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 6:11 a.m. No.23012476   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23012474

 

2/2

 

In their first public remarks on the contest, neither Taylor nor Ley took responsibility for the election result, and both made pitches to Australian women.

 

“We did let the women of Australia down,” Ley said on Sunrise on Friday morning.

 

”I’m determined and convinced that I am the right person to lead the party forward at this time, and I think my appointment would send a strong signal to the women of Australia, but it’s about much more than that,” she said. “It is about the policy offering. It is about what modern Australia expects of us as Liberals. It is about working collegiately across our party, and it is about a strong work ethic, something that I’m known for in our party and in our country.”

 

Taylor said if he was successful in his bid for the Liberal leadership, which will be decided at a party room meeting on Tuesday, he would draw on experience from his business career of overhauling companies for consultancy firm McKinsey. He has previously been criticised by some colleagues for the party’s sparse economic agenda taken to the election.

 

“In opposition, I’ve been on the front line of economic debates,” he said. “In my career, I’ve helped rebuild organisations and created successful businesses.”

 

“We must bring in new talent that reflects modern Australia – especially more women.

 

“We must operate like a campaign every day – with strong candidates, clearer messages, smarter strategies and greater fundraising.

 

“We need to modernise our organisation from the ground up and back our volunteers and members, who give so much to our cause.“

 

Canavan – a former minister who has turned into a rebellious senator focused on immigration and free speech – also announced on Friday that he would challenge Littleproud for his party’s leadership despite having minimal support in the party.

 

“We should scrap the futile and unachievable goal of net zero emissions by 2050,” he said in a statement.

 

“Net zero makes everything more expensive, and it is not helping the environment given that the US, China and India are no longer even paying lip service to it.

 

“Our plan should be based on how we can save the country, not save the party. I am standing for my party’s leadership so that I can tell my kids I did everything I could to fight for a better life for them.”

 

Former deputy prime minister Barnaby Joyce underwent surgery for prostate cancer this week and is not planning to run against Littleproud at Monday’s party room meeting in Canberra. Canavan was chief of staff for Joyce between 2010 and 2013.

 

Joyce backed the principle of having a contest for the leadership, but stopped short of endorsing Canavan.

 

“I’m glad there is a contest for leadership. It is an incredibly honourable position, incredibly important for our nation and seminal if we are to put ourselves in a position to be considered as the next government,” Joyce told this masthead.

 

Nationals MPs argued privately that Littleproud was weakened by Price’s defection because he failed to avert it despite Price telling colleagues as far back as 2022 she was eager to join the Liberals.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/sussan-ley-declares-candidacy-for-liberal-leader-after-the-party-let-the-women-of-australia-down-20250509-p5lxtt.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 6:17 a.m. No.23012489   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2493 >>4135 >>2129

>>22986131

>>23002844

>>23007424

Queensland senator Matt Canavan to challenge David Littleproud as senior Nationals warn: if Coalition splits, so be it

 

DENNIS SHANAHAN and SARAH ISON - 9 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Queensland Nationals senator Matt Canavan, a minister in the Turnbull and Morrison governments, is challenging for the leadership of the National Party, deepening the crisis in the crushed Coalition and increasing the rift with the Liberals.

 

Senator Canavan will challenge incumbent leader David Littleproud in a partyroom meeting in Canberra on Monday with an appeal for the Nationals to fight for themselves and their supporters in the face of Liberal Party losses and the defection of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price to the bigger Coalition partner.

 

Senior Nationals are accusing the Liberals of not behaving like true partners and of betraying the faith of the Country Liberal Party and their supporters, and blame the Liberals for the extent of the loss, warning that if the Coalition should split then “so be it”.

 

One senior National MP said Senator Nampijinpa Price’s defection on Thursday to the Liberal Party would “have an effect on the Coalition agreement”, with the future of the agreement now in question and due to be discussed at the next National Party federal management meeting.

 

Senator Canavan told The Australian: “On Monday, I plan to stand for the leadership of the Nationals party to bring back our fighting spirit. Only if we fight, will we have a fighting chance.”

 

“David Littleproud can be enormously proud of his role in defeating the voice, putting nuclear power on the agenda, and having divestiture powers adopted as Coalition policy for the first time,” the former resources minister said in an article for The Australian. “But this debate is not about protecting his job or mine. This is about fighting for the jobs and livelihoods of the many people we represent. Many of the people that vote for the Nationals party have to shower after work, not before it.

 

“Our plan should be based on how we can save the country, not save the party. I am standing for my party’s leadership so that I can tell my kids I did everything I could to fight for a better life for them.

 

“The plan we took to the last election was rejected. We need a new plan. I have been arguing for a different approach ever since we signed up to net zero. So I believe that I am in a stronger position to prosecute change.

 

“We should scrap the futile and unachievable goal of net-zero emissions by 2050. Net zero makes everything more expensive and it is not helping the environment given that the US, China and India are no longer even paying lip service to it.

 

“The primary goal of our electricity system should be to reduce power bills not reduce emissions.”

 

While the Nationals appear to have held their seats in the House of Representatives, the defection of Senator Nampijinpa Price to the Liberals and the loss of the Nationals’ deputy leader, Perin Davey, after she was relegated to a losing spot on the NSW Senate ticket below two Liberals, there is rising anger over the election result.

 

The Nationals were also unable to win back the NSW seat of Calare from former Nationals MP, Andrew Gee, who resigned from the party and won the central west seat as an independent with a big swing towards him. Nor did the Nationals gain the new seat of Bullwinkel in Western Australia or the Labor-held seat of Bendigo after a close contest. But because of the extent of the Liberal losses, including Peter Dutton’s own seat of Dickson in Queensland, the Nationals now have their greatest proportion of Coalition seats since the 1960s and ’70s.

 

Nationals Senate leader Bridget McKenzie has publicly blamed the Liberals for the extent of the loss and complained about the “recruitment” of Senator Nampijinpa Price into the Liberals’ partyroom five days after she was elected as a CLP senator. On Friday Senator McKenzie told The Australian the Nationals had taken collective responsibility for the loss and were better placed than then Liberals in “an arithmetic and cultural sense”.

 

“What I’m very concerned about is that it now seems that the Liberal Party was actively recruiting Senator Nampijinpa Price five days out from an election. That is not the behaviour of partners, of trusted partners,” she said.

 

“Those of us in the National Party aren’t just Liberals that live in the country. We actually have a very separate political philosophy and a long tradition. We’re over 100 years old, and we are very renowned in our communities for delivering for them.

 

“The Liberal Party has got a lot of deep thinking to do. We wish them well with that, but they shouldn’t be seeking to damage us in the process of trying to rebuild themselves.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 6:18 a.m. No.23012493   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23012489

 

2/2

 

On Monday all three Nationals leadership positions – the leader, deputy and Senate leader – will be declared vacant, with Senator Davey, given her departure on July 1, not expected to renominate.

 

Senator Nampijinpa Price’s decision to run on the Nationals ticket and then switch to the Liberals just days after the election was blasted by colleagues, who said the “pressure” was now on Mr Littleproud to contain the fallout.

 

While one argument was that the Nationals needed to land an “above the pay rate” Coalition agreement – allowing the party more shadow ministry positions than what would be nominally based on their diminished numbers – other Nationals sources said the whole agreement was now in question.

 

“There’s every chance you don’t see Coalition agreements for 12 or even 18 months,” one MP said.

 

“We’d be looking at the Western Australian model. That will now be a conversation no matter who wins (Liberal leadership).”

 

The Nationals MP pointed to the handling of defections in the past – for example, when Ian Macfarlane left the Liberals – and said that back then, the leaders got together to speak about the matter and how it could be handled best for both parties.

 

That was different to the Nationals party being completely blindsided by Senator Nampijinpa Price, with sources telling The Australians she had informed her colleagues of her decision only “15 minutes” before putting out her public statement.

 

The future of the Coalition agreement will be discussed at the National Party federal management meeting next Friday, attended by the heads of state party branches, with MPs confirming “permission” would be sought to “go hard” on the deal with the Liberals.

 

“No one will go break up the … Coalition without the permission and consent of the broader party,” one Nationals MP said.

 

“There will certainly be a discussion of permission or otherwise on Coalition agreements.”

 

Senator Canavan said Nationals supporters are being worn down: “While our banks grow fat on the teat of carbon credits and green subsidies, our workers pay for it every quarter in their power bill and every week in their shopping trolley.”

 

“The greatest disappointment of our election loss is that we let down Western Australian sheep graziers, truck drivers, fencing contractors and their families. For the first time in history an Australian government is shutting down an entire industry, the live sheep trade. Thousands will be put out of work at a time of economic crisis,” he said.

 

“Our government has stopped a goldmine because of a story about a mythical bee. Water buybacks are killing our nation’s foodbowl. And Labor is conducting an experiment to see if we can power major industry based on weather forecasts,” he added, as part of an argument to drop the 2050 net-zero carbon emissions target.

 

“The now Labor-Green Senate means that we may lose much more. Almost all of the jobs at risk are outside our capital cities.

 

“The Coalition adopted an election strategy that we could save these jobs by not fighting for them. We did not visit the abandoned goldmine. West Australian farmers barely got a mention.

 

“We were lectured that we should not speak up because ‘city’ voters would be repelled if we fought for farmers, miners and factory workers.

 

“The Nationals party did well at the election but only relative to the disastrous result for the Liberals. We failed in the task to help win government.

 

“The Nationals should return to a more forthright style that helped deliver recent election victories.”

 

Senator Canavan argued for increased regional settlement, higher birthrates and family support through income splitting.

 

“We need to provide more support to the family unit through income splitting and increased family tax benefits to give people the financial freedom to have the family they want,” he said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/matthew-canavan-to-challenge-david-littleproud-for-nationals-leadership-after-price-defection/news-story/58b36593d06b1e9277b5564e6881fd55

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 6:26 a.m. No.23012508   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2266

>>22989198

>>22998144

>>23007467

China criticises Australia over joint exercises with Philippines, US in South China Sea

 

Stephen Dziedzic - 9 May 2025

 

China's Foreign Ministry has sharply criticised Australia after it conducted another joint military exercise in the South China Sea with the US and the Philippines, accusing all three nations of trying to "create trouble."

 

The Royal Australian Navy's destroyer HMAS Sydney joined a guided missile frigate from the Philippine Navy and aircraft from both the US and the Philippines last week to conduct the drills.

 

Clashes between China's coast guard and vessels from the Philippines have intensified over the last 18 months, and several countries — including the US, Japan, Australia and Canada — have responded by stepping up joint military exercises with the Philippines in the contested waters.

 

China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian told reporters in Beijing that the United States was using the Philippines as a "pawn" against China, and that Manila had "brought in and collaborated with forces outside the region to create disruptions and flex military muscles".

 

"The US and other countries outside the region have patched up small groupings in the South China Sea to stoke confrontation in the name of cooperation, flex military muscles in the name of freedom, and create trouble in the name of upholding order," he said.

 

"They are the biggest source of risks undermining the peace and stability in the South China Sea."

 

China claims almost the entirety of the South China Sea as its territory, and has ignored a 2016 ruling which found that claim had no basis under international law.

 

Australia hasn't responded directly to China's most recent criticism but the Department of Defence said last week the joint exercise was aimed at "build(ing) mutual understanding and interoperability between nations and armed forces."

 

"Australia and our partners share a commitment to upholding the right to freedom of navigation and overflight, other lawful uses of the sea and international airspace, and other maritime rights under international law," the department said.

 

"By training and operating together, forces can build upon shared tactics, techniques, and procedures to enhance interoperability and readiness to respond to shared security challenges."

 

China has been trying to force the Philippines off several disputed areas in the South China Sea, with Manila accusing Beijing of bullying behaviour and intimidation.

 

The US, Australia and the Philippines conducted joint exercises in the South China Sea with Japan in February. Australia also sent a surveillance aircraft to take part in joint exercises with the US, Philippines and Canada in August last year.

 

Analysts say China's recent partial navigation of the Australian mainland was aimed, in part, at dissuading the Albanese government from joining multilateral exercises in the South China Sea.

 

But the Albanese government has been adamant that doing so is critical to maintaining international law and freedom of navigation in the region, and signalled that it has no intention of reducing its activity in the region.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-09/china-criticises-australia-us-philippines-south-china-sea-drills/105271426

 

https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202505/t20250508_11617555.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 6:43 a.m. No.23012542   🗄️.is 🔗kun

FBI tip-off leads to arrest of Alice Springs man for child rape

 

LIAM MENDES - 9 May 2025

 

An Alice Springs man has been charged with multiple child abuse offences – including the alleged rape of a child – following a referral by the United States’ Federal Bureau of Investigation.

 

Earlier this week NT Police received an “urgent referral” from the FBI, via the Australian Federal Police, with officers executing a search warrant and allegedly seizing “large quantities” of child abuse material.

 

Officers from the NT Joint Anti-Child Exploitation Team, a joint child abuse taskforce comprising of the Australian Federal Police and NT Police, allege the man also sexually assaulted a child “under the age of five”, who was known to him.

 

He has been charged with nine serious child abuse charges of sexual intercourse with child under 10, two counts of gross indecency with child under 14, three counts of produce child abuse material for use via a carriage service, possess or control child abuse material, access child abuse material and transmit child abuse material.

 

NT Police Detective Superintendent Paul Lawson commended the “seamless collaboration” between NT Police, AFP and the FBI to bring the man before the courts.

 

“If you allegedly abuse a child or procure, access and transmit child abuse material, we will find you, and you will be prosecuted,” Superintendent Lawson said. “We will continue to work tirelessly to protect children from harm.”

 

Senior police warned that alleged “offenders cannot hide behind a screen” if they allegedly “carry out these reprehensible and hideous acts”.

 

It comes just months after The Australian revealed a five-year-old boy had allegedly been raped in a remote Northern Territory community, with one advocate alleging half of the 20 remote communities she visited in 2024 had children as young as five exhibiting “harmful sexual behaviour”.

 

Child abuse prevention educator Holly-ann Martin, who has visited 87 remote communities during her 35-year career to provide her abuse prevention education ­program, said there was an “epidemic” of child sexual abuse and further awareness needed to be drawn to the “nationwide issue”.

 

“I would have been in at least 20 remote communities last year and at least half of them were because of children exhibiting harmful sexual behaviours,” she said on Friday.

 

Ms Martin, who was awarded an Order of Australia for her work with children, said these cases had already been reported to authorities, but she was seeing children as young as five who had been exposed to pornographic material and were then going on to act out what they were seeing in pornography on other children.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/fbi-tipoff-leads-to-arrest-of-alice-springs-man-for-child-rape/news-story/2dff7a58b4b2dc864228fb415a288a12

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 6:50 a.m. No.23012560   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2563 >>2183

Google AI chatbot, Gemini, to be available to Aussie kids under 13 within months

 

Ange Lavoipierre - 9 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Google will launch its Gemini AI chatbot for Australian children under 13 within months, the ABC can reveal.

 

The tech giant is rolling out the program in the US this week, with a worldwide launch to follow in the coming months, although no date has yet been specified.

 

The announcement has prompted calls for the government to consider banning AI chatbots for children, in the same way it banned social media for children under 16.

 

"It would've been better if we'd erred on the side of caution with social media, and we didn't," said Professor Toby Walsh, a leading expert in Artificial Intelligence University of New South Wales.

 

He's urging leaders to "seriously consider putting age limits on this technology."

 

The ABC understands the chatbot will be automatically available to children via Google's Family Link app after the launch, although parents will have the option to switch it off.

 

"It's unusual to me that this would be turned on by default," said Professor Lisa Given, an expert in the social impact of technology at RMIT University.

 

"It relies on parents … or the child themselves, having the skill to navigate the controls and turn things off.

 

"And it may only be turned off at the point that it raises problems … but in a way it's too late at that point."

 

Google isn't the only company whose AI chatbot is available to younger children.

 

For example, OpenAI's website states that ChatGPT is "not meant for" people younger than 13, even though it's free on the open web.

 

But Google's Gemini tool is one of the few mainstream tools explicitly targeted at users that age.

 

"The problem is that [the tech companies are] tone deaf to the concerns, I think, that many parents have," Professor Walsh said.

 

"And the reason that they're tone deaf is … the financial incentives that they're looking at; how to onboard the next generation of users."

 

AI chatbots for under-13s: What could go wrong?

 

Multiple experts expressed alarm at the plan, saying AI chatbots pose more acute risks for children.

 

They warned Google's Gemini chatbot has the potential to confuse, misinform and manipulate children.

 

"Systems that are enabled by AI can certainly hallucinate or make up information," Professor Given said.

 

"You have to have some fairly sophisticated skills in terms of discerning truthfulness."

 

Every expert the ABC spoke to had concerns younger people may have difficulty understanding that the chatbots are not human.

 

"These systems really attempt to replicate or mirror how people engage with each other," said Professor Given, adding that even adults weren't immune to the illusion.

 

"I've done some research looking at Replika, where adults were actually very much taken in … and really came to believe that they had a relationship with the system itself, very much like a friend or even a romantic partner," she said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 6:52 a.m. No.23012563   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23012560

 

2/2

 

Google echoed some of those concerns in an email to parents in the US ahead of the rollout there, warning "Gemini can make mistakes" and suggesting they help their children think critically about their interactions.

 

"I think this is Google saying that we're rolling this out, but it isn't entirely safe," said John Livingstone, director of digital policy for UNICEF Australia.

 

"If a tech platform is acknowledging that there may be risks in their own products … then yeah, we should sit up and take notice," he said.

 

Google is planning to include default protections for younger users, to filter out inappropriate content from Gemini's responses, but experts remain wary.

 

"It's very hard to deliver on that promise," Professor Walsh said.

 

"Whenever we put protection safeguards in place, people quickly find ways to circumvent … those safeguards."

 

"It may not be widespread, but there may be cases where children are still getting access to inappropriate content," Professor Given said.

 

Calls for a ban and new laws to protect children from AI

 

Australia doesn't yet have AI safeguards in place, although the government has been developing them for more than two years.

 

The government has also announced a "digital duty of care," which would force tech companies to build their products safely from the ground up, but is yet to bring a bill before parliament.

 

"This is actually an excellent example of why Australia needs a digital duty of care legislation to come in," Professor Given said.

 

"What we actually need is for the technology companies to manage content appropriately for all of us so that using these tools is as safe as it can be — no matter your age".

 

Mr Livingstone said children stand to gain immensely from AI, if it's offered safely.

 

"When you think about education, for example, how transformative it might be… but there's also serious risks.

 

"AI is rapidly changing childhood, and Australia needs to get serious about it."

 

But Professor Walsh said it wasn't just a case of "putting in better filters and safeguards".

 

"It's asking fundamental questions about should this be age limited. We should be having a serious conversation as a society about that," he said.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-09/google-gemini-ai-launch-australian-kids/105267302

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 9, 2025, 6:57 a.m. No.23012568   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2183

>>22986131

>>22992843

‘I build relationships’: Albanese ready for crucial tariff negotiations with Trump

 

BEN PACKHAM - May 08, 2025

 

Anthony Albanese says his people skills will stand him in good stead when he sits down with Donald Trump in the Oval Office in coming weeks, in what looms as a pivotal meeting to plead Australia’s case for a tariff carve-out.

 

“I build relationships with people,” the Prime Minister told Sky News when asked how he would navigate the encounter.

 

“I have many friends in the business community, in the union movement, in civil society, groups that I’ve engaged with for a long period of time.

 

“I’m pretty upfront in how I engage with people and I’ve developed that as well on an international level.”

 

Mr Albanese will go into the meeting with a renewed mandate and fresh confidence following his election win and President Trump’s conciliatory sit-down with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney this week.

 

A soon-to-be announced trade deal between the US and Britain, teased by Mr Trump on his Truth Social network on Wednesday, will also set a positive tone for the talks.

 

The agreement will be the first of Mr Trump’s second term and comes as his administration progresses trade talks with India and Japan, and prepares for critical negotiations with China.

 

Don Farrell, who hopes to be reappointed Trade Minister when Mr Albanese unveils his frontbench in coming days, is also preparing a diplomatic push to shore up Australia’s trade ties.

 

If he retains his job, as is widely expected, he is likely to attend the APEC trade ministers meeting in South Korea next Thursday for talks with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and rattled Asian counterparts whose economies could be ruined by Mr Trump’s tariff blitz.

 

Preparations are also under way for video conferences with new EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic and Indian Trade Minister Piyush Goyal to kickstart fresh negotiations on Australia-EU and Australia-India deals.

 

Australia is prepared to scrap the $5.2bn luxury car tax to secure a free-trade agreement with the EU if European negotiators offer a better deal for Australian agricultural exports than they did in 2023, when talks on a proposed FTA collapsed.

 

Senator Farrell, who spoke to Mr Sefcovic on election night, said he believed past roadblocks with the EU could be overcome.

 

“I have a sense that the mood has changed, certainly in Australia, but also in Europe,” he said.

 

“I’m very confident that with sensible discussions with this new man in the EU that we can make some progress and very quickly come to a settlement on a free-trade agreement.”

 

Senator Farrell said he believed a deal with India was imminent.

 

“The Indians also contacted me. We were very close to a free-trade agreement with them, and I think we can move very quickly now to finalise that agreement,” he said.

 

The government is offering New Delhi priority access to Australia’s critical minerals and the nation’s labour market to get the agreement across the line.

 

Former European Commission deputy secretary-general Hervé Jouanjean sounded a note of caution on the prospects for an Australia-EU FTA.

 

He told The Australian that scrapping the luxury car tax might not be enough, especially if Victoria and Queensland retained their own versions of the tax.

 

“My personal view would be that something on cars would certainly be welcome but I am not sure that this will be enough to settle the whole negotiation,” he said.

 

The Prime Minister is expected to combine his upcoming visit to Washington with a trip to Canada for the G7 leaders summit, from June 11-13, which Mr Carney has invited him to attend. Mr Albanese will travel to Jakarta next week for talks with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/i-build-relationships-albanese-ready-for-crucial-tariff-negotiations-with-trump/news-story/e23e24c8adfe701c22ce35cbc6b313e9

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 10, 2025, 6:52 a.m. No.23016865   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6875

Aussie teen girl to speak at sentencing for sadistic cult ringleader Kyle Spitze

 

An Aussie teen blackmailed by a sadistic online cult ringleader will speak against him at his sentencing, after police found images of her on his phone. WARNING: Graphic

 

Julie Cross - May 10, 2025

 

EXCLUSIVE: The FBI has asked an Australian teenager blackmailed into livestreaming self-harm and live sex shows to speak at the sentencing of one of the ringleaders of a sadistic extremist online cult.

 

Kyle Spitze, 25, a notorious member of terror groups 764 and offshoot HarmNation – where offenders compete with each other to coerce kids to kill their pets and produce sexual and violent content – is due to be sentenced in a court in Tennessee in July.

 

Among the heinous crimes he has agreed to plead guilty to are possessing child sexual abuse material – some were of a child aged 12 – and distributing ‘animal crushing’ videos.

 

His charges relate to US victims, but the FBI have also found images of the Australian girl, who we are not naming, on Spitze’s phone.

 

After being contacted by the FBI via the Australian Federal Police, both the Australian girl and her mother will give victim impact statements via video link at Spitze’s sentencing. A detective from the NSW police has been helping them with their statements.

 

The mother said these predators were pure evil and her daughter, who was left suicidal, was “covered with scars that are visible, and those inside her that are not”.

 

“She was made to mutilate her body and encouraged to starve herself, leading to a diagnosis of anorexia,” her mum said.

 

She hopes being allowed to read her impact statement to Spitze will give her 18-year-old daughter, who was 16 at the time of the abuse, some power back.

 

Spitze, who operated under the name ‘Criminal’, was a leading figure in this global network of dangerous deviants, who work individually and collectively, to abuse young victims.

 

The Australian girl found herself passed virtually to different members around the world, including a man in Sweden.

 

Explicit images of her were made public as punishment for not complying with their demands.

 

Later, one ordered her to murder the family pet cat which she also refused.

 

In revenge, members “swatted her” – made calls to the Australian police with false allegations – which led to a dozen armed police surrounding the family home.

 

The Australian Federal Police released warnings about sadistic sextortion groups last year.

 

Helen Schneider, from the AFP-led Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (ACCCE), said these offenders – many are children – exploit other children “for their deranged amusement”.

 

“The content we’ve seen demanded includes live sex acts, animal cruelty, serious self harm and requests for livestreamed suicide of our victims,” she said.

 

The groups seek out children on popular social media and gaming apps, like Roblox, Minecraft, Instagram and Snapchat, before moving them onto Telegram and Discord, where the abuse is broadcast.

 

Spitze’s sick activities were exposed after a video he posted of his stepfather shooting him in the ear went viral and victims outed him as an abuser.

 

An AFP spokesperson said intelligence sharing between international and domestic law enforcement partners has enabled them to identify and investigate online users linked to some of these extreme groups online.

 

In 2022, a 14-year-old from WA was found to have child abuse material and videos of animal cruelty on his phone after targeting victims around the world.

 

He was charged and received a juvenile caution in relation to the matter.

 

''Police are urging the public who have information about people involved in child abuse to contact the ACCCE.''

 

https://www.accce.gov.au/

 

''If you know abuse is happening right now or a child is at risk, call triple-0.''

 

''For help with emotional difficulties, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or at:''

 

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

 

''For help with depression, contact Beyond Blue on 1300 22 46 36 or at:''

 

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

 

''The SANE Helpline is 1800 18 SANE (7263) or at:''

 

https://www.sane.org/

 

https://www.cairnspost.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/aussie-teen-girl-to-speak-at-sentencing-for-sadistic-cult-ringleader-kyle-spitze/news-story/14f7b20560520575681d59e0838b80bf

 

 

The 764 Network: The Strange Case of Kyle Spitze

 

Becca Spinks - Jul 19, 2024

 

https://x.com/bx_on_x/status/1814158500458569768

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 10, 2025, 6:55 a.m. No.23016875   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6898

>>23016865

How gun-toting Texas mum Becca Spinks takes down online cult 764

 

She describes herself as “just a normal mum”, is hunting predators online who are targeting Aussie kids through their evil twisted acts.

 

Julie Cross - May 10, 2025

 

1/2

 

EXCLUSIVE: This is the gun toting Texan mum looking to take down a new wave of sadistic online abusers grooming Australian kids to livestream sick and twisted acts from their bedrooms.

 

In July, the self-defence educator and independent investigator, Becca Spinks, hopes to be in court to watch 25-year-old Kyle Spitze, from Tennessee, get a hefty jail sentence after he agreed to plead guilty to charges of possessing child sexual abuse material and distributing ‘animal crushing’ videos.

 

One of his victims is Australian.

 

“I just want to look at him and see if there’s any kind of soul left,” Spinks said.

 

“Every time I’ve seen him on video, in a picture, he just looks demonic. He looks evil.”

 

None of Spitze’s charges relate to the NSW victim, now 18, but the FBI found pictures of her on his phone, and she alleges he and other members blackmailed her into doing livestream sex acts and self-harm shows. She was also forced to carve their names into her body with a blade.

 

Spitze is a big scalp for Spinks, 40, who describes herself as “just a normal mum”, who hunts predators online in her spare time.

 

His big mistake was posting a video of his stepfather shooting him in the ear in January 2024, which went viral. His victims, who saw the video, began outing him on social media as a pedophile and sadistic Satanist in an online cult called 764, and an offshoot group called HarmNation.

 

“The day that video went viral, Kyle was on X threatening the girls who were trying to speak out against him, and his tag was Criminal764,” Spinks said. “We looked at his followers and we found all these other abusers.”

 

Her online detective work, along with help from his victims, including the mother of the Australian teenager, played a significant role in bringing Spitze to the attention of the FBI.

 

And it shone a light on these deviant misfits, some children themselves, who get off on torturing mainly young girls to take part in degrading sex acts, live ‘cut shows’, animal abuse – one victim bit off the head of their hamster – and where the ultimate prize is getting someone to livestream their own suicide.

 

Unbelievably, the group’s US-based founder, Bradley Cadenhead, a gore video junkie, was himself just a child of 15 when he set it up in 2021. He was jailed for 80 years in 2023 for creating videos in which children were sexually abused, choked, beaten and suffocated.

 

While Spitze and Cadenhead are in the US, it has global appeal, with offenders operating all over the world, often out of their bedrooms. Australia is not immune. In a warning about groups including 764 last year, the Australian Federal Police said a 14-year-old from WA was found to have child abuse material and videos of animal cruelty on his phone after targeting victims overseas. He was charged in 2022 and received a juvenile caution in relation to the matter.

 

Spinks said her efforts to expose Spitze and 764, upset other offenders, including ‘Acid’ – real name Cameron Finnigan – 19, from the UK.

 

“Figures like Acid and a few others started to really harass and threaten me because they didn’t like the attention they were getting,” Spinks said. “So I just kept it up, you know? And over time, I became like the public face of all of this.”

 

Finnegan has since been jailed for six years for encouraging suicide, possessing a terrorism manual, and indecent images of a child. Police discovered swastikas and pentagrams on his bedroom walls.

 

Spinks said 764 and groups like it are continually evolving, and popping up in different forms, but they all operate under an umbrella community nicknamed the ‘Com’.

 

Some align themselves with pedophiles, or Satanists or white supremacists, or a mix, or none of the above. The one common thread is their desire to terrify and traumatise their victims in order to gain status and notoriety within their groups.

 

They seek out vulnerable victims in self-harm or eating disorder chatrooms, as well as on social media and gaming apps like Minecraft and Roblox.

 

Their modus operandi is to befriend kids on social media and gaming apps, shower them with affection, before manipulating them into providing something like an explicit photo of themselves – then threatening to share the photos unless they produce ever more extreme content.

 

Many victims don’t recognise themselves as victims, and are sometimes persuaded to become abusers themselves.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 10, 2025, 6:59 a.m. No.23016898   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23016875

 

2/2

 

It’s hard to believe that there is anything worse than this, but other extremist groups are also gaining the attention of authorities, including the Maniac Murder Club, which originated in Ukraine, and is also known as MKU or MKY, which Spinks described as a group of “satanic serial killing terrorists, that is even crazier than 764”. Another, No Lives Matter, has a similar agenda.

 

They want followers – and victims-turned-abusers – to move into real-world violence.

 

“No Lives Matter is like the splinter group that was created by MKU to get 764 kids to do more violent, real life stuff,” Spinks said. “So they wanted to pull them away from the child abuse and extortion and towards real life acts of violence and terrorism.

 

“Your kid can become a victim, but they want your kid to become an abuser as well. They want your kid to go commit a school shooting, right? They want your kid to commit suicide on camera. I hate to say it, but these are not your normal child sexual abuse types of people who try to get in and leave.

 

“There’s a cult behind it. These kids are the foot soldiers, so to speak. They can wind these kids up like little wind-up toys and send them on their way via whatever means that they can.”

 

The Global Network on Extremism and Technology, run by academics from King’s College London, describes MKU/MKY as a “militant accelerationist” group that advocates for acts of violence in order to bring down the current social order.

 

Sometimes there is a political bent, but mostly it is about “offline criminality, including assault, murder, and terrorism to maintain their membership”.

 

Australia’s domestic intelligence agency ASIO has repeatedly warned about the worrying rise of kids being indoctrinated in their bedrooms.

 

In August, when ASIO raised the terrorist threat level from ‘possible’ to ‘probable’, head of the agency, Mike Burgess, said the number of children embracing violent extremism is increasing and that “extremist ideologies, conspiracies, misinformation, are flourishing in the online ecosystem and young Australians are particularly vulnerable”.

 

University of Adelaide Associate Professor Tim Legrand said his work involves looking at the spread of online extremism and its effects on young Australians, particularly males.

 

He explained that the internet is an amplifying space for a tiny number of bad actors.

 

“You probably have a lot more lurkers, observers, readers, than active people,” Assoc Prof Legrand said. “These perpetrators have large audiences and they generate infamy. And so given that most children over the age of 14 have a mobile device in their pocket, they have potentially audiences of millions.”

 

He said from those only a very small percentage would go on to offend, but “small percentages of large numbers, are large numbers”.

 

Spinks said most parents are ignorant of the dangers these groups pose, but that if a child is on the internet unsupervised they are at risk of being abused or being groomed into becoming an abuser.

 

Helen Schneider, from the AFP-led Australian Centre to Counter Child Exploitation (ACCCE), said parents should be aware of what their child is doing, seeing and saying online.

 

And, if their child has been a victim, they need to reassure them it’s not that fault and to report to the ACCCE.

 

She said warning signs include kids being online more, being more secretive about their devices and being on them at different times of day and night.

 

Spinks said when she first shone a spotlight on these groups she was disbelieved and mocked, but following a flurry of arrests and warnings from crime agency authorities, things are changing.

 

“I’m on a vindication arc because of all the arrests and stuff. I’m like, finally the cavalry came in because, for a while here, it was just me,” she said.

 

The Australian victim’s mum said she will be forever grateful to Spinks.

 

“She was the only person I had helping me for the longest time,” the mum said. “If I had not found her, and if she had not been posting about it, I would have completely given up.

 

“Without having that one person who knew what was going on, who was fighting in our corner, I doubt I would have managed to keep pushing for justice for my daughter.”

 

''For help with emotional difficulties, contact Lifeline on 13 11 14 or at:''

 

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

 

''For help with depression, contact Beyond Blue on 1300 22 46 36 or at:''

 

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

 

''The SANE Helpline is 1800 18 SANE (7263) or at:''

 

https://www.sane.org/

 

https://www.cairnspost.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/how-gun-toting-texas-mum-becca-spinks-takes-down-online-cult-764/news-story/7973800ad5f7358d112e96d24f69ce2f

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 11, 2025, 2:31 a.m. No.23020102   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0105 >>2129

>>22986131

>>23007443

Dumped cabinet minister says Richard Marles a 'factional assassin', and demotion partly due to outspoken views on Gaza

 

Jake Evans - 11 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Dumped cabinet minister Ed Husic says his decision to speak out on the conflict in Gaza was partly to blame for him being dropped from the frontbench, while making an extraordinary accusation that the deputy prime minister acted as a "factional assassin" out of naked ambition for his branch.

 

Mr Husic told Insiders his experience in cabinet was that Labor had to be "encouraged" to speak out on the issue, but said he would not be silent on it.

 

"To be able to take part in a cabinet meant a great deal. You can't celebrate diversity and expect it to sit in a corner silent," Mr Husic said.

 

"I certainly took the view you need to speak up for the communities you care about. I certainly tried to help us navigate wretchedly difficult issues, such as Gaza post the horrors of October 7.

 

"I don't think I could ever stay silent in the face of innocent civilians slaughtered in tens of thousands, starved out of Gaza."

 

The outgoing minister also lashed out at Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, who had a hand in Mr Husic being booted from the frontbench.

 

"I think people, when they look at a deputy prime minister, they expect to see a statesman, not a factional assassin," he said.

 

"The difficult issue here is that we've had bare-faced ambition and a deputy prime minister wield a factional club to reshape the ministry."

 

He added that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese should have intervened to stop the factional play, but failed to do so.

 

Mr Husic said he respected the need for factions to manage merit and ambition, but Mr Marles would have to answer for his role in himself and Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus being demoted.

 

The pair were dropped in a brutal factional play on Friday in order to make way for Victorian MPs Daniel Mulino and Sam Rae, a close ally of Mr Marles, and to balance the left and right factions in NSW, from where Mr Husic hails.

 

Mr Husic, the first Muslim cabinet minister and the first to be sworn in on the Quran, has been one of the most vocal in the government on the conflict in Gaza.

 

The Sydney politician has also been a key player in engaging with Muslim communities angry at the government's response to Israel's war following the October 7 attack by Hamas.

 

Mr Husic said there needed to be "faith in Muslim communities that their voice was being heard", but that sometimes had to be encouraged.

 

Able to speak more freely now that he is on the backbench, Mr Husic was blunt in his assessment of the Netanyahu government.

 

"We've seen just in the past week or so, the Israeli parliament say it wants to annex Gaza and effectively that is a form of ethnic cleansing. We've seen the starvation of its people through the failure to provide humanitarian assistance," he said.

 

"It should be held to account. Starvation is a war crime."

 

The conflict has roiled within Labor, last year prompting Muslim senator Fatima Payman to quit the party after it punished her for voting against the government on a motion to accuse Israel of genocide in Gaza.

 

A United Nations report earlier this year accused Israel of "genocidal acts", which was rejected by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as false, biased and antisemitic.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 11, 2025, 2:33 a.m. No.23020105   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23020102

 

2/2

 

Liberal leadership contest expected to be close

 

The political parties are all reorganising their ranks for the next term of parliament, with Labor juggling a deeper bench of talent and factional allegiances, while the Liberal Party and Greens search for new leadership after shock defeats at the federal election.

 

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price this morning confirmed her candidacy for deputy Liberal leader under Angus Taylor, who is contesting for the leadership against Sussan Ley.

 

Liberal senator Dave Sharma, who openly expressed his desire to enter the shadow ministry on Sky News, said he expected the contest between Mr Taylor and Ms Ley to be very close.

 

"I think it's very important, whatever the outcome is, everyone respects the result and everyone gets behind the new leader," Senator Sharma said.

 

"I know that's not going to be easy, but we don't have the luxury of being able to tear ourselves apart over the next year or two."

 

After Senator Nampijinpa Price's dramatic defection last week from the Nationals to sit in the Liberal party room, Senator Sharma said she was welcome in the party and entitled to put her hand up for deputy — but the party would decide its leadership team.

 

In a statement, Senator Nampijinpa Price said her new party must return to its "basic values".

 

"There is no question that returning to our roots as a party is critical right now," Senator Nampijinpa Price said.

 

The Northern Territory senator said the Liberals must fight for the "forgotten people" and, in a statement, raised her Warlpiri grandparents, who had grown up "washing their clothes in the creek" in Warners Bay on the coast of NSW.

 

"My Warlpiri grandparents caught the vision and transitioned from nomadic desert life into community life during the emergence of a modern Australia," Senator Nampijinpa Price said.

 

"They were the original Aussie battlers - the forgotten people."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-11/ed-husic-dumped-minister-gaza-partly-to-blame-speaking-out/105278932

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjnrWS-Y5L4

 

https://x.com/AngusTaylorMP/status/1921327100407029836

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 12, 2025, 2:41 a.m. No.23024096   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4101 >>7918 >>2130

>>22986131

>>23002844

>>23007424

Talent over factions: Angus Taylor and Sussan Ley promise to end the Liberal civil war and fight PM

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 12 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Angus Taylor has pledged to ­reward talent over factional allegiances, elevate more women into leadership positions and make the Liberal Party campaign machine “fitter, flatter, faster and more ­focused” ahead of his showdown with Sussan Ley on Tuesday.

 

In an interview with The Australian, the opposition Treasury spokesman said the Coalition must focus on policies that “go for growth” and allow a full range of technologies to deliver “the ­affordable, reliable energy Australians want”.

 

Mr Taylor and Ms Ley – who spent Mother’s Day at home with their families on Sunday – are locked in a tight contest to ­replace Peter Dutton as opposition leader.

 

The combatants and their supporters will hit the phones on Monday as they seek to win over undecided colleagues ahead of the federal Liberal Party parliamentary team voting for a new leader and deputy leader in Canberra on Tuesday morning.

 

In a video statement released by Ms Ley on the weekend, the Acting Opposition Leader said “we have enormous depth of talent in our partyroom, and I want to draw on all of it over the next three years”.

 

“We will develop strong policy offerings through robust party room processes so we can demonstrate we will deliver better outcomes for all Australians. We need to change, the Liberal Party must respect modern Australia, reflect modern Australia and represent modern Australia,” Ms Ley said.

 

‘My election as leader of the Liberal Party would send a very strong signal that we understand that things must be done ­differently.”

 

Responding to concerns raised by some Liberal MPs about NSW factionalism infecting the federal partyroom, Mr Taylor said “our numbers are now so depleted that if we start selecting what roles people play based on tribal allegiances we will not succeed, full stop”.

 

“We have to reach across the divide and have the very best people on the ground in every area,” Mr Taylor told The Australian. “The team is so small now, relative to what it has been in the past, that there’s lots of work to do for everybody as long as we are aligned in the belief that the Labor Party can’t deliver what Australia needs and we can.”

 

Mr Taylor, who cited strong working relationships with junior ministers he had previously collaborated with, including Tim Wilson, Dean Smith and James McGrath, said: “It’s talent and merit and what we can offer first, and all of those tribal allegiances need to come a distant second.

 

“I’m not naive to the fact that they exist, but I do believe we can bridge across those if we all ­recognise that this is a massive regroup and rebuild job we’ve got to do and we’ve got to get back in the fight.”

 

After former state and territory Liberal leaders Gladys Berejiklian, Barry O’Farrell, Jeff Kennett, Nick Greiner and Shane Stone ­endorsed Ms Ley as leader, former prime minister Tony Abbott on Sunday supported Mr Taylor and Jacinta Nampijinpa Price as the new Liberal Party leadership team, after Senator Price said she would nominate for deputy leader.

 

Supporters of Ms Ley said she was running an open ticket that wasn’t predicated on any deals. They also said she would base her frontbench on merit and putting the best team on the pitch.

 

It is understood that opposition energy spokesman Ted O’Brien is considering a separate run for the deputy leadership after Dan Tehan pulled out of the race. Ms Ley, who has been accused by rivals of launching her leadership campaign ahead of the election to gain an advantage, has strongly pushed the need for more women in the party.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 12, 2025, 2:42 a.m. No.23024101   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23024096

 

2/2

 

Asked about how he would ­recruit and promote women, Mr Taylor said: “We’ve got to reconnect to significant parts of our community that we failed to connect to in the election, and that includes women.

 

“That has to be an absolute ­priority for us. Strong women have been around me all my life and I want more of that, not less. This is really personally important to me.

 

“Having a wonderful woman join the Liberal Party like Jacinta, we should absolutely welcome her with open arms.

 

“She brings much to the table and I will keep ­welcoming great women to the Liberal Party wherever I possibly can.”

 

On whether the Liberal Party should adopt a gender quota system, Mr Taylor said: “Attracting good women to the party is about attracting talent.

 

“We, as the Liberal Party, cannot confine ourselves to any one group.

 

“We’ve got to find talented candidates, talented volunteers, talented people to work in our organisation, talented campaigners wherever we can find them and clearly that includes women who are 50 per cent of our ­population.”

 

As energy minister in the Morrison government, Mr Taylor adopted a technology neutral approach to strengthening the nation’s power grid.

 

After Labor launched a highly effective scare campaign targeting Mr Dutton’s nuclear energy policy, Mr Taylor said “we’ve got some serious reflection to do about Labor’s weaponisation during the campaign, about what that means about the policy we took to the election”.

 

“Now is not the time to make decisions about that but it is certainly the time to begin the reflection on that,” he said.

 

“What I do know is that the approach that seems to be working around the world is freeing up the supply side and allowing the full range of technologies, technology not taxes, as a way to deliver that affordable, reliable energy Australians want.

 

“And I think we’ve got to get back to our roots on this one, which is Liberals have always believed in choice and the full range.”

 

In response to agitation in Nationals ranks and comments made by Liberal senator Dave Sharma on Sky News about revisiting the merits of a Coalition agreement, Mr Taylor described himself as a “Coalitionist … I always have been and I always will be”.

 

“At the end of the day, we’ve got to win 50 per cent of the seats plus one, and that requires a Coalition,” he said.

 

“The people who will want to vote Liberal, if they feel that we’re up for it, are aspirational, they believe in the power and importance of small business, they see the crucial role of families. These are very widely held views across our country and we share those views across our Coalition.”

 

Mr Taylor, who unlike other Liberals in NSW managed to secure a swing towards him, identified as a top priority the importance of modernising the Liberal Party’s campaign machine.

 

“We have to organise and campaign differently. We need an ­organisation and a campaign strategy, which is fitter, flatter, faster and more focused,” he said. “That’s because we live in communities now that are more fragmented than ever.

 

“We must do better at messaging to those groups, whether they be women or younger Australians or Hindu Australians, Muslim Australians, Chinese Australians, right across the board.

 

“On the policy side … we have to make sure that we have those policies out in the field early and the work being done early at the beginning of the term, not later in the term to attract those groups of voters, including women.”

 

Liberal Party federal director Andrew Hirst will confirm the names of which candidates and MPs currently ahead in their lower house seats can participate in the ballot on Tuesday.

 

The two most likely additions are moderate Liberal Gisele Kapterian, who is ahead in the north Sydney seat of Bradfield, and conservative LNP MP Terry Young, who holds a narrow lead in the southeast Queensland seat of Longman.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/talent-over-factions-angus-taylor-and-sussan-ley-promise-to-end-the-liberal-civil-war-and-fight-pm/news-story/9647343c2cec97e548a9fb6556fa8b81

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 12, 2025, 2:49 a.m. No.23024121   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2130

>>22986131

>>23007443

Albanese makes big changes, unveils new Plibersek role in major reshuffle

 

David Crowe - May 12, 2025

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will fly to Rome within days to join world leaders at the inauguration mass for Pope Leo XIV, after overhauling federal cabinet by naming new ministers to workplace relations, environment and social services.

 

Albanese is expected to meet counterparts, including Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen at the Vatican, amid global concerns about American policy on trade and security under US President Donald Trump.

 

The plans come after the prime minister promoted five colleagues and moved six others to set up a new ministry for Labor’s second term in power, acting on a factional deal last week to remove Mark Dreyfus and Ed Husic from the cabinet.

 

A day after Husic called Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles a “factional assassin” for removing colleagues, Albanese played down the internal strife by saying the reshuffle followed the usual process in the Labor caucus to choose the frontbench.

 

Albanese promised an “ambitious agenda to change this country for the better” and noted that Labor would have the largest federal caucus since federation, with at least 92 seats. The Coalition has only 41 seats in the latest counting.

 

“I’m deeply humbled by the trust that was put into my government with the election, and we certainly won’t take it for granted,” he said.

 

Albanese will leave Australia early on Wednesday to visit Indonesian president Prabowo Subianto in Jakarta, and then fly to Rome for talks with other world leaders as well as the formal mass to mark the inauguration of Pope Leo this Sunday.

 

The talks will include tighter co-operation with Canada, a key security ally that has felt the brunt of Trump’s ire, and the prospect of a broader trade agreement with the European Union, a deal that was shelved last year because it did not do enough for Australian beef and lamb exporters.

 

Albanese elevated two members of the Left faction, Anne Aly and Tim Ayres, into federal cabinet, after last week’s factional deals removed Dreyfus and Husic.

 

Aly will become the first Muslim woman to hold a cabinet position, being named minister for multicultural affairs and international development, as well as being responsible for small business.

 

Ayres becomes minister for industry and innovation as well as minister for science, replacing Husic.

 

In a sign of the scale of the changes, Tanya Plibersek has been moved sideways from her old portfolio of environment to become minister for social services, a key task after past departmental scandals over robo-debt and income support.

 

Albanese has installed Queensland senator Murray Watt as minister for environment and water at a time when the government wants to restart talks with the Greens to pass a stalled bill to set up an agency to oversee project approvals, the environment protection agency.

 

Anika Wells trades her old portfolio of aged care for communications and sport, a key position when the government must consider whether to risk blowback from media companies and professional sporting bodies by regulating online gambling more strictly.

 

Amanda Rishworth, former minister for social services, becomes minister for employment and workplace relations to replace Watt.

 

Michelle Rowland, the former communications minister, becomes attorney-general to replace Dreyfus.

 

The reshuffle comes little more than a week after a huge election win for Labor, which increased its majority as the Coalition suffered huge losses.

 

Treasurer Jim Chalmers, Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles have retained their positions.

 

Asked about Plibersek’s move, Albanese gave a brief answer: “She was very positive about the portfolio.”

 

The National Disability Insurance Scheme will be overseen by two members of the executive, with Health Minister Mark Butler gaining responsibility for the NDIS at cabinet level. NSW senator Jenny McAllister, previously in charge of emergency management, becomes minister for the NDIS in the outer ministry.

 

This follows the retirement of former NDIS Minister Bill Shorten before the election.

 

Andrew Charlton – someone the prime minister was keen to promote – will become the cabinet secretary and assistant minister for science and the digital economy.

 

The ministry is set to be sworn in by Governor-General Sam Mostyn at 9am on Tuesday.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-makes-sweeping-changes-to-frontbench-20250512-p5lycj.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ionU1tjLmo

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 12, 2025, 2:53 a.m. No.23024135   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2130

>>22986131

>>23007424

>>23012489

David Littleproud remains as Nationals leader, seeing off Matt Canavan challenge

 

Tom Crowley - 12 May 2025

 

David Littleproud will continue as federal leader of the Nationals after a party room vote in Canberra, seeing off a challenge from his colleague Matt Canavan.

 

Mr Littleproud, who became leader in 2022, was approved to continue by his colleagues in the closed-door ballot, after an election which saw the minor party go backwards by one seat in each house. The margin has not been disclosed.

 

Kevin Hogan was chosen as deputy leader and Bridget McKenzie remained as Senate leader. Mr Hogan was the opposition trade spokesperson in the last parliament, and Senator McKenzie was infrastructure spokesperson.

 

"It's a great honour to lead our great party. I'm proud of our achievements over the last three years, three years where I think we set the policy agenda," Mr Littleproud said after the meeting.

 

National Party rules see the leadership "spilled" automatically after each election, even if there is no rival.

 

But the conservative Senator Canavan revealed late on Friday he would nominate, saying the party needed to be "louder" in opposition to climate targets.

 

The party room was rocked last week by the defection of senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price to the Liberal Party, where she intends to nominate for the deputy leadership on Tuesday.

 

Senator Price's move, which saw the party reduced to just four senators, was openly scorned by Senator Canavan and tersely acknowledged by Mr Littleproud, and has led to misgivings within the party about its senior coalition partner.

 

While the Liberals went backwards most severely in the recent federal election, the Nationals also fell short of their aspirations, failing to claim the seats of Bendigo or Bullwinkel and failing to retain the seat of Calare, won by former Nationals MP-turned-independent Andrew Gee.

 

No word yet on nuclear policy

 

Mr Littleproud said the Nationals' campaigning on the Voice referendum under his leadership had "shifted the result" and hailed the minor party's influence in pushing for the adoption of a nuclear energy policy and supermarket divestiture powers.

 

But he declined to say whether the nuclear policy would stay the same amid calls from Senator Canavan and others to dump net zero and re-embrace coal.

 

"We're going to review all our policies and we'll do that in a calm, methodical way … The reality is that the leader of the National Party doesn't determine the policy direction of our party, the collective does," he said, though adding "the fundamentals haven't changed" on nuclear.

 

Senator McKenzie said both Coalition partners needed to "listen to the Australian people with humility, understanding that these were collective decisions of both the Liberal and the National party".

 

"We need to respect their decision and we need to have a deep, honest look at what went wrong."

 

Mr Littleproud said he was "disappointed" about Senator Price's defection, but that his party would "be the adults in the room, because that's what the National Party's been for the last three years".

 

The Liberal party room will meet on Tuesday, and the Greens on Thursday, after Anthony Albanese revealed his new-look ministry on Monday.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-12/littleproud-remains-as-nationals-leader/105282850

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 12, 2025, 3 a.m. No.23024162   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2131

>>22986131

>>23002836

Liberal candidate for Kooyong Amelia Hamer concedes defeat to teal MP Monique Ryan

 

ZOE DE KONING and MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 12 May 2025

 

Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer has formally conceded defeat to teal MP Monique Ryan in the seat of Kooyong, saying the remaining ballots would not be enough to secure her victory.

 

In a statement released on Monday afternoon, Ms Hamer said she had phoned Dr Ryan to congratulate her on her re-election and praised the “beautiful local community” of Kooyong.

 

“Whilst counting continues, it is now clear that the remaining ballots will not deliver us the majority we need to win the seat,” Ms Hamer said.

 

“Standing as the Liberal candidate for Kooyong has been an honour.”

 

The contest in the once blue-ribbon Liberal stronghold has been closely watched following Dr Ryan’s 2022 win over then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg.

 

“Liberal values – like individual freedom, equality of opportunity, and free enterprise – are timeless. They are worth fighting for,” Ms Hamer said.

 

“We are so lucky to have a beautiful local community, a fair democracy, and a wonderful country. I hope to play my small part in making it a better place, now and into the future.”

 

Dr Ryan claimed victory of the seat in an official statement released shortly after Ms Hamer’s announcement.

 

“Serving as the member for Kooyong has been the privilege of a lifetime. I’m incredibly honoured to continue in this role, and thank the electorate for this opportunity,” she said.

 

The former pediatric neurologist confirmed she had received a call from Ms Hamer on Monday, and “wished her the best for her future endeavours”.

 

“I’m grateful for the opportunity to continue to hold the government to account on the economy, climate, health, and the other critical issues for my community,” Dr Ryan said.

 

“It’s a crucial time for Australia – we’re facing a cost-of-living crisis, housing shortages, increasing intergenerational inequity, and our response to the global challenge of climate change has been too slow and too incremental.

 

“With the Albanese government holding an increased majority, it’s time for it to show the courage we need – and respect the mandate given to it by the Australian public – by taking real action on these issues.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/liberal-candidate-for-kooyong-amelia-hamer-concedes-defeat-to-teal-mp-monique-ryan/news-story/00578d5f9131bd2d58855128de42dcc1

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 12, 2025, 3:12 a.m. No.23024200   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2082 >>2185

Australian Nick Parsons killed in Ukraine while clearing mines

 

LIAM MENDES - 12 May 2025

 

A former Australian Defence Force member killed in eastern Ukraine while clearing mines for an explosives disposal charity has been described as “a hero for Ukrainians” who was engaged in dangerous work close to the frontlines.

 

Nick Parsons, who was working for a US-registered organisation named Prevail Together, was killed last week in Izyum.

 

A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokeswoman confirmed DFAT was “providing consular assistance to the family of an Australian man who died in Ukraine”.

 

Mr Parsons, believed to be from Queensland, had been working to clear mines and other unexploded ordnance in Ukraine following a long stint in the Australian Defence Force, which one source said he had recently left.

 

Izyum is a city in the Kharkiv Oblast region approximately 40km from the frontline.

 

Ukrainian ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko told The Australian on Monday Mr Parsons was “a hero for Ukrainians who was on a very important mission”.

 

“There are individuals like Nick Parsons who couldn’t sit on the couch, and decided to go and travel,” Mr Myroshnychenko said.

 

“I understand he was trained to be an engineer … I understand there was also another British guy who he was with, and both of them got killed, as mates being there, they got rid of unexploded ordnance as well as mines.”

 

Mr Myroshnychenko said the size of the area that had to be de-mined because of Russia’s invasion in February 2022 – now into its third year – is larger than Switzerland.

 

“It’s certainly a dangerous job, as you can imagine, it’s kind of one of those 50-50, jobs, 50 per cent you’re going to live, 50 per cent you going die,” the ambassador said.

 

“It’s very sad and it’s tough news for everybody, he was a hero for us on a very important mission.

 

“(He was) very close to the frontlines, so that part of Ukraine, which is close to the Russian border, and where the frontlines are, it’s heavily mined, lots of unexploded ordnance, because Russians are shelling us all the time.”

 

In a social media post on May 7, Prevail Together said it had received “devastating news” that its founder and chairman, Christopher “Swampy” Garrett, and other team members had been “severely injured in an incident near Izyum”.

 

Mr Garrett was described on social media as “one of the best”, and had been engaged in mine clearing in Ukraine since 2014.

 

“Most people run from danger,” one mourner said.

 

“Swampy and his crew are true heroes for the work they do to as first responders, trainers and humanitarian mine action advocates. My thoughts are with the team and their families during this difficult time.”

 

At the outbreak of Russia’s invasion in February 2022 Mr Garrett had rushed to Ukraine to continue his work, where he described himself as an “explosive bin man”.

 

In an interview with The Times in May that year he said that not long after Kyiv was almost surrounded by Russian forces, he cleared tonnes of explosives in surrounding cities where they had left booby traps in doorways, washing machines, cupboards, car boots and even under the corpses of civilians.

 

He said that in order to stay calm he would smoke 40 cigarettes a day.

 

“I make sure that I get at least two coffees in before I go to work and don’t run out of cigarettes throughout the day. That’s how I roll,” he said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/australian-nick-parsons-killed-in-ukraine-while-clearing-mines/news-story/934c2f8ef8e983033b8c0da0eb4b2f75

 

https://www.prevailtogether.org/

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d2Pcm5KXclQ

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 12, 2025, 3:19 a.m. No.23024217   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0024 >>2240

>>22959474

Remembering Virginia Giuffre: The woman who helped bring down Jeffrey Epstein

 

Sammi Taylor - 11 May 2025

 

Virginia Giuffre's life was never easy.

 

She had overcome extraordinary tragedy - sexual abuse as a child, homelessness and multiple sex-trafficking rings - to become a powerful advocate for sex abuse survivors around the world.

 

To her lawyer and friend Sigrid McCawley, she was lion-hearted.

 

"I think Virginia's legacy is something that we haven't seen before in our history," McCawley told 60 Minutes reporter Tara Brown.

 

"She has left us with a feeling that irrespective of whether you're a president, a politician, a billionaire, or a prince, that you can be held accountable. You are not above the law."

 

60 Minutes Australia first met both Giuffre and McCawley in 2019, when Virginia was in combat mode.

 

She was on a mission to bring to account some of the world's richest and most powerful people.

 

Her decision to be the first to forgo anonymity to also accuse billionaire Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell of sex abuse and sex trafficking changed the course of many lives.

 

Giuffre was just 16 when she was hired by Epstein and British socialite Maxwell in 2000 to be a private masseuse.

 

Giuffre said she was sexually abused by the pair before being trafficked to their powerful friends, including Prince Andrew - a claim he continues to deny, despite settling a civil suit with Giuffre in 2022 for an undisclosed sum.

 

"She put Epstein in prison. She put Maxwell in prison. She had Prince Andrew stripped of his titles," McCawley said.

 

"Her words, her actions were incredible. And they started a movement of change."

 

But on the evening of Anzac Day this year, police and family confirmed the shocking news that Giuffre had taken her own life.

 

For McCawley, the news was a shock.

 

"Overwhelming surprise and disbelief. True disbelief," she said.

 

"It took me several hours to even come to terms with the fact that that was real."

 

But Giuffre was clearly distressed in the last weeks of her life.

 

In a recent and confusing social media post, she claimed she was suffering renal failure after a car accident involving a school bus.

 

Disturbingly, she said she'd been given only four days to live.

 

Giuffre had also recently become estranged from her children, something McCawley said was devastating to her.

 

"I think that anybody who's a mother would feel and understand that being deprived access to your children has to be the worst thing that could ever happen to you," she said.

 

"So I think that while Virginia could face many demons in her life and many villains, that moment of deprivation I think was something that was more than she could handle."

 

Giuffre's loss will be felt keenly by the survivors of sexual abuse she had always supported.

 

And for those who knew and loved her, there is now an aching hole.

 

"I used to say that we had broken through the lawyer-client line because she would sign her emails, 'I love you Siggy'," McCawley said.

 

"She was just a dear person in my life. And I think that the world will not be the same without her. It just won't be."

 

If you or someone you know needs support, help is available 24/7.

 

Lifeline: Call 13 11 14, text 0477 13 11 14 or visit:

 

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

 

Beyond Blue: Call 1300 22 4636 or visit:

 

https://www.beyondblue.org.au/

 

1800RESPECT: Call 1800 737 732, text 0458 737 732 or visit:

 

https://1800respect.org.au/

 

https://9now.nine.com.au/60-minutes/virginia-giuffre-the-woman-who-helped-bring-down-jeffrey-epstein/d3893b22-c893-41e1-9c34-3fff7296c036

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OHL_s7LRPg

 

 

Q Post #4923

 

Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)

 

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624

Dearest Virginia -

We stand with you.

Now and always.

Find peace through prayer.

Never give up the good fight.

God bless you.

Q

 

https://qanon.pub/#4923

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 13, 2025, 3:28 a.m. No.23027894   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2185

High Court to decide if information gathered on encrypted messaging app AN0M was legally obtained

 

Elizabeth Byrne - 13 May 2025

 

The High Court will on Tuesday delve into the murky world of organised crime and encrypted messaging on an app known as AN0M, which was secretly controlled by the FBI and the Australian Federal Police (AFP).

 

The operation known as "Ironside" began in 2018, when phones with the app began to circulate among criminal elements, encouraged by people the police identified as "criminal influencers", who unwittingly recommended the devices.

 

It appeared to be a secure way to send messages, except that every communication was being copied and forwarded to police.

 

In 2021 there was a worldwide crackdown.

 

The app had collected about 28 million messages, including 19 million relating to Australia.

 

The Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) said there were nearly 1,000 arrests globally, with 42 tonnes of illicit drugs and $US58 million in cash and crypto currency seized.

 

According to AFP data, there have been nearly 100 people in Australia charged, with drugs, firearms, and substantial amounts of money seized.

 

The ACIC said at the time the operation "provided voluminous, invaluable intelligence and insight that has never been obtained before by Australian law enforcement".

 

But now two South Australian men, who are alleged members of the Comancheros bikie group, want the High Court to find that information was not legally obtained.

 

The two are charged with belonging to a criminal group and possession of prohibited firearms.

 

Their lawyers will tell the High Court the evidence against them collected from AN0M should be inadmissible in their trial, because its collection breached The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.

 

"The question is whether communications obtained covertly by the AN0M application were obtained as the result of an unlawful interception," their submissions to the court said.

 

The pair have so far failed in two appeals against the use of the information, but were granted special leave to appeal by the High Court last year.

 

Soon afterwards the case took a new turn when the Commonwealth changed the law, to back up the use of the app by police.

 

On Tuesday the High Court will also consider if the new law is valid.

 

In their submissions the men's lawyers said it interferes with the exercise of judicial power guaranteed under the constitution.

 

"It is an invalid exercise of legislative power," submissions for the men said.

 

The lawyers will tell the High Court the new law undermines the institutional integrity of the courts, removing the "fact finding" function which is a hallmark of judicial power.

 

But the Commonwealth will tell the High Court the new law does not direct the courts to find any fact, and is valid under the constitution.

 

The Commonwealth also said in its submissions the new act made no difference to the interception laws.

 

"[The] Court of Appeal was correct to conclude that the AN0M evidence did not involve an interception in contravention … of the Interception Act," Commonwealth submissions said.

 

The attorneys-general for New South Wales, Western Australia and Victoria have intervened, along with the Director of Public Prosecutions for South Australia, which has applied to intervene in support of the Commonwealth.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-13/act-operation-ironside-an0m-app-high-court-preview/105275242

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=an0m

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=anom

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=ironside

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 13, 2025, 3:36 a.m. No.23027918   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7924 >>2019 >>2025 >>2032 >>3614 >>8406 >>8411 >>2839 >>7420 >>2269 >>2131

>>22986131

>>23002844

>>23024096

'We have to have a fresh approach': Sussan Ley becomes first woman to lead Liberal Party after defeating Angus Taylor

 

Daniel Jeffrey - May 13, 2025

 

1/2

 

Sussan Ley has promised a fresh approach for the Liberals after defeating Angus Taylor to become the first woman to lead the party in its 81-year history.

 

Ley, the moderate candidate who was deputy under Peter Dutton for the last three years, narrowly saw off conservative shadow treasurer Taylor 29 votes to 25 in this morning's party room meeting.

 

"We have to have a Liberal Party that respects modern Australia, that reflects modern Australia, and that represents modern Australia," Ley said following her victory.

 

"And we have to meet the people where they are. And that's what I am committed to doing and what I am determined to do.

 

"I want to do things differently, and we have to have a fresh approach."

 

Ley will become not just the first woman to lead the Liberals, but also the first to be federal opposition leader – from either party – in Australian history.

 

Ted O'Brien, one of the most strident supporters of the Coalition's nuclear plan in his former role as shadow energy spokesperson, was elected her deputy.

 

He defeated surprise candidate Phil Thompson 38 votes to 16.

 

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who had made a controversial defection from the Nationals to the Liberal Party late last week to stand for the deputy leadership under Taylor, didn't officially nominate for the deputy position after Taylor had been defeated.

 

Price later said Taylor's defeat was the reason she didn't contest the position.

 

She congratulated Ley on her election and said she would work with her and O'Brien, but also admitted the decision wasn't what she wanted.

 

"While I am disappointed Angus Taylor was not elected leader, I respect the decision made by my colleagues within the party room today," Price said.

 

Taylor congratulated Ley on her election, saying "becoming the first woman to lead the Liberal Party is a milestone for Sussan and our party", before making a call for unity.

 

"The Liberal Party has suffered a historic defeat, and we have lost many good people in this election," he said.

 

"This result shows we must do more to convince Australians that the Coalition is the best party to support aspiration, economic opportunity, and the Australian dream… I will contribute the best way I can to help get us back in the fight."

 

Ley, in turn, praised Taylor as "an intelligent, talented contributor to so many ideas" and promised him an "integral" role in the opposition.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 13, 2025, 3:38 a.m. No.23027924   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23027918

 

2/2

 

Questions loom over Coalition, energy policy, and winning women back

 

Ley inherits a Liberal Party reeling from a catastrophic election loss that will likely see the Coalition reduced to just 44 seats, and grappling with what direction to take on economic policy, how to re-engage women voters, and whether to retain its nuclear power advocacy.

 

Asked about energy policy, Ley said the party would take time to determine its approach but added she "absolutely" agreed with the need for Australia to reduce emissions.

 

"I committed to my colleagues that there would be no captain's calls by me," she said.

 

"I also committed… that we would work through every single policy issue and canvas the different views and take the time to get it right… we have to get energy policy as a whole right."

 

She signalled a departure from predecessor Peter Dutton on a number of fronts, including by committing to regularly front the press gallery media and saying she was happy to stand in front of the Indigenous flag.

 

Ley also said she wanted to "start with a positive relationship" with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, and flagged an intention to reconnect with female voters.

 

"I said in my statement for candidacy in this position that we did let women down," she said.

 

"There is no doubt about that. It is true the number of women supporting us is declining and I want to rule the line under that.

 

"I don't want to see that claim for one more day.

 

"That means a genuine, serious engagement with the new leadership team and a new agenda – and one I will personally drive."

 

On top of those concerns, Ley will face discussions about the Coalition's future.

 

David Littleproud didn't commit to renewing the agreement between the two parties yesterday after he saw off a challenge from Senator Matt Canavan to retain the Nationals leadership.

 

"We're going to review all our policies and we'll do that in a calm, methodical way," he said.

 

Asked about the future of the partnership between the Liberals and Nationals, Ley said she was a supporter of a strong Coalition and was expecting to have a positive discussion with Littleproud.

 

"I'm yet to have a conversation with David Littleproud, but when I do it will be a constructive one."

 

Ley said she would announce her shadow cabinet later, but that it would include MPs and senators who both supported her and voted against her.

 

https://www.9news.com.au/national/liberal-party-leadership-sussan-ley-defeats-angus-taylor/4181ede7-50ea-48f6-8f5b-5f1d24926a58

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDdhwZVIWCY

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 2:05 a.m. No.23032017   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2132

>>22986131

AEC investigates after missing ballot papers found at election worker's home

 

Pat McGrath - 14 May 2025

 

Almost 2,000 ballot papers went missing on election night and were later recovered from the Sydney home of a temporary Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) worker, the ABC can reveal.

 

While the AEC said the incident did not affect the result in the seat of Barton because the votes had already been counted, it has not explained how the ballots ended up at the worker's home and has launched an investigation.

 

The AEC confirmed the worker collected a secure container holding 1,866 House of Representatives votes from a polling booth in the Sydney suburb of Hurstville after polls closed on May 3, but failed to deliver it to the commission's central counting centre.

 

"Ballot papers were securely packaged in the presence of scrutineers with an authorised transport officer collecting two ballot paper transport containers for delivery to a central counting centre to await further processing," an AEC spokesperson said in a statement.

 

"The staff member responsible erroneously returned one less container than was expected."

 

Error detected

 

Officials at the AEC only noticed the container was missing when they began a routine recount of votes in the electorate last week.

 

"The AEC's tracking processes for ballot paper transport containers identified that one of the two transport containers for the Hurstville polling place was not returned to the central counting centre on election night as it should have been," the spokesperson said.

 

The AEC recovered the container early last week.

 

"This issue relates to a single transport container that remained sealed and intact and has not affected the election," the AEC said.

 

"The uniquely coded security seals were not broken, and the AEC's purpose-built ballot paper transport container was intact.

 

"All ballot papers are accounted for.

 

"The AEC takes ballot paper handling extremely seriously."

 

Labor's Ash Ambihaipahar won the seat, beating Liberal Fiona Douskou with more than 60 per cent of the two-party-preferred vote.

 

The AEC was not able to provide details about where in the worker's home the container was found.

 

"It was obtained from the individual's home where it was collected by permanent AEC staff," the spokesperson said.

 

"The only specific detail I have regarding the collection is that it was obtained during a conversation outside the staff member's house, following identification of the custody of the container."

 

The commission has launched an investigation into the matter but declined to say whether it had referred the incident to law enforcement agencies.

 

Potential impact

 

University of Sydney electoral law expert Anne Twomey described the incident as a "serious matter".

 

"Although it had no effect upon the outcome of the election in this case, it could have resulted in the election being held void in that seat if the ballots had been destroyed," Professor Twomey said.

 

"While concerning, this case does remind us that there are many layers of protection built into the electoral system to ensure it is secure.

 

"The system ensured there was accountability, although it seems likely there was some kind of failure to identify immediately that the container had not been delivered to the counting centre."

 

In 2013, the AEC was forced to re-run Western Australia's senate election after 1,370 ballots went missing in what a parliamentary inquiry described as the "greatest failure in the history of the Australian Electoral Commission".

 

Professor Twomey said the latest incident was likely to prompt a fresh inquiry into the commission's transportation of ballot papers.

 

"The AEC will no doubt investigate this matter thoroughly and learn from the failure," she said.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-14/aec-investigating-after-ballot-papers-missing-barton-sydney/105286812

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 2:10 a.m. No.23032019   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2132

>>22986131

>>23027918

Sussan Ley reframes herself as supporter of Israel

 

RHIANNON DOWN - 13 May 2025

 

Sussan Ley has lashed Anthony Albanese’s response to the Middle East conflict as a major threat to “social cohesion” and asserted her support for Israel, as she sought to distance herself from her past pro-Palestinian views.

 

In her first public address as Opposition Leader, Ms Ley said while she was still a “steadfast friend” of Palestinians, and criticised their leaders for “letting them down”, she had changed her views on the conflict.

 

Ms Ley, a former co-chair of the Parliamentary Friends of Palestine group, said she now saw the issues through a “different prism” after a trip to Israel, a move that has been praised by Jewish leaders.

 

Ms Ley said in 2008 that Palestinians are “airbrushed out of existence”, but on Tuesday declared it was one of the “great privileges” of age that she could re-examine her views after the issue had been “thoroughly ventilated” with her colleagues.

 

“Following my appointment as deputy, I took a trip at the invitation of Julian Leeser, an outstanding colleague and dear friend, to Israel,” Ms Ley said.

 

“I spent a lot of time seeing what was happening on the ground.

 

“The impact of that trip and the changed geopolitical circumstances of the Abraham Accords, with Israel reaching out for peace to Saudi and Morocco, and then, of course, the hideous events of October 7 in Gaza, have changed my thinking on the entire subject.”

 

The new Liberal leader took aim at the Prime Minister and Penny Wong for their response to the Israel-Hamas war and domestic anti-Semitism, vowing to “hold Labor to account” over the issues.

 

In her closing remarks, Ms Ley called out Mr Albanese for allowing a sense of “isolation, fear, and real concern” for Jewish Australians to pervade.

 

“One of the biggest threats to social cohesion in this country is the Prime Minister’s approach to Jewish Australians and everything that happens overseas,” she said.

 

“I’ve reflected on that, with the hideous events in Gaza, has domestic implications.

 

“We have a Foreign Minister, Penny Wong, who has let down Australia in the UN and we have a Prime Minister who is intent, it seems, on letting down Jewish Australians on the streets of our cities.”

 

Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council executive director Colin Rubenstein said Ms Ley had become a “staunch friend” to the Jewish community in recent years.

 

“She participated in a study visit to Israel as part of AIJAC’s Rambam Israel Fellowship Program in 2022 and has been principled and informed in speaking out in support of Israel, especially during the current war with Hamas,” Dr Rubenstein said.

 

“She has consistently and constructively engaged with our community and listened to our concerns, and we look forward to working with her in her new role.”

 

Ms Ley did not name Hamas directly, but criticised the Palestinian leadership for not being “interested in peace with Israel”.

 

“It is not a party interested in a secure Israel behind secure borders, and it is not a party interested in a just and lasting peace,” she said.

 

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim commended Ms Ley for re-examining her views.

 

“She is right when she says Israel currently has no partner for peace in Gaza,” he said.

 

“In the face of these realities Sussan Ley has rejected the reflexively antagonistic attitudes of Israel’s perennial critics. For this she deserves our respect.”

 

Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler said the Jewish community had a “strong and constructive” relationship with the Coalition.

 

“We look forward to continuing that under the new leadership of the Liberal Party, and working closely to ensure the Australia-Israel connection remains strong,” he said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/sussan-ley-reframes-herself-as-supporter-of-israel/news-story/b5963028ea8d0b5d369ab91a993fc642

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 2:19 a.m. No.23032025   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2134

>>22986131

>>23027918

>>23007424

Jacinta Price ‘chickened out’ of deputy vote, say infuriated and blindsided Angus Taylor backers

 

Paul Sakkal - May 14, 2025

 

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price shocked the allies who brought her into the Liberal Party when she did not put her hand up to run as deputy once her running mate, Angus Taylor, lost the leadership ballot against Sussan Ley.

 

Price had not told anyone in Taylor’s camp that she would only run if Taylor won, prompting fellow conservative Phillip Thompson to nominate on the spur of the moment to fill the gap.

 

The Northern Territory senator’s defection from the Nationals to the Liberals last week to run on Taylor’s ticket caused bad blood between the Coalition partners and alarmed Liberal moderates worried that the maverick politician did not have the experience for the role, having been in parliament for just three years. But senior Liberals, including Tony Abbott, engineered the move believing she would energise the party’s base.

 

But in Tuesday’s meeting in Canberra, Price failed to put her hand up when nominations for the deputy position opened. Energy spokesman Ted O’Brien, who supported Ley as leader, immediately declared his candidacy for the deputy spot when nominations opened at 10.17am.

 

Price, according to several MPs in the room, turned to look towards a section of the opposition party room where her Right faction allies, including Andrew Hastie and others, were seated. She shook her head, the MPs said, indicating she would not be running.

 

Last-minute nominee Thompson, an up-and-coming 37-year-old from Townsville, lost the ballot to O’Brien by 38 votes to 16, but his conservative allies were relieved that he chose to create a contest and represent his Right faction.

 

“She totally f*cked us,” one supporter of Taylor said of Price’s blindsiding.

 

Similar sentiment was expressed by six Taylor supporters to whom this masthead spoke in the hours after Ley – backed by Alex Hawke’s centre-right faction and party moderates – became the first woman to lead the party.

 

“There’s no other explanation other than that she chickened out. The Gus [Angus Taylor] vote was first and he lost. She knew she would have lost by a bigger margin, so she chickened out,” another MP said.

 

Some of Taylor’s conservative supporters in the Senate were unenthusiastic about the prospect of Price as deputy leader, as she could have leapfrogged them for higher-ranking Senate positions.

 

Thompson, who almost won his northern Queensland seat of Herbert on primary votes alone, said he knew he was unlikely to win when he unexpectedly threw his hat in the ring, but said he was a “firm believer that you have to be in the arena to have a shot”.

 

“As a proud and passionate North Queenslander, I made the decision to have a crack. While I didn’t get the outcome I had hoped for, I’ll never stop fighting for North Queensland,” he said, congratulating Ley and O’Brien and pledging his support.

 

“Democracy in action is a beautiful process and something for which I hold enormous respect, particularly having fought under the Australian flag to protect our democratic rights.”

 

Price compounded the frustration among her Liberal colleagues when she appeared on Sky News hours after she pulled out of the ballot and entertained a question about moving to the lower house to potentially become the prime minister one day.

 

“Well, there is that,” she said when asked by host Chris Kenny about becoming the prime minister. “I know there’s a lot of Australians who’d love to see that.”

 

Asked if the Liberal Party would unite behind Ley, Price’s endorsement was lukewarm. “Well, that is the hope,” she said. “I will be supporting the leadership because that is what we have to do if we want to do a good job in opposition.”

 

Taylor’s allies in the Right, according to several MPs, do not plan to destabilise Ley’s leadership in the short term. However, they are watching closely to see if Ley rewards the powerbrokers who secured her win – including Hawke and Andrew Bragg’s NSW moderates – to the exclusion of right-wingers.

 

Ley appeared alive to the risk of disunity when on Monday when she said: “My shadow cabinet will include people who did support me in this room this morning, and people who did not.”

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/jacinta-price-chickened-out-of-deputy-vote-say-infuriated-and-blindsided-angus-taylor-backers-20250514-p5lz1n.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 2:31 a.m. No.23032032   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2033 >>2134

>>22986131

>>23027918

Andrew Hastie declares ‘desire to lead’ the Liberal Party

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 14 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Andrew Hastie has declared his “desire to lead” the Liberal Party, revealed the de-industrialisation of Australia keeps him up at night and warned about the power of big tech and corporates in a podcast with a Labor-aligned think tank.

 

In a 50-minute podcast recorded on Tuesday after Sussan Ley pipped Angus Taylor for the Liberal Party leadership, Mr Hastie outlined his vision to connect with younger voters and focus on the four enterprise institutions of family, the home, education and small business.

 

Speaking on the Curtin’s Cast podcast with John Curtin Research Centre executive director Nick Dyrenfurth and RedBridge Group pollster Kos Samaras, the 42-year-old cited his young family and the pressures of commuting from Western Australia as reasons he decided not to run for leadership.

 

In the immediate aftermath of the Coalition’s May 3 election bloodbath, the former Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security chair and Special Air Service regiment officer was touted for leadership by senior Liberal figures after he secured primary and two-party preferred swings in his outer-metropolitan Perth seat of Canning. While Liberal MPs in capital cities across the country lost their seats, Mr Hastie increased his margin.

 

Mr Hastie, the son of a Presbyterian minister and public school teacher, who has three children with wife Ruth aged between three and nine, said he was focused on understanding the “problem that we’re facing as a party”.

 

“Leadership is going to come in many forms over the next three years. Susan Ley has just made history as the first female leader of the Liberal Party. That’s a really important role,” Mr Hastie told the Curtin’s Cast podcast.

 

“But leadership can’t be confined to just the position. We’ve also got to lead in the battle of ideas as well. And I think that’s where I want to make a contribution.

 

“I’d be foolish to say I don’t have a desire to lead. I do have a desire to lead. But the timing was all out for personal reasons. A really important thing in politics is to know where you stand. And I came to that conclusion very quickly.”

 

Ahead of Ms Ley finalising her frontbench next week, The Australian understands Mr Hastie is keen to step-up into a prominent role outside of the Defence portfolio he held under Peter Dutton.

 

Asked to identify the big policy challenge Australia must confront into the 2030s, Mr Hastie said “the thing that keeps me up at night is the de-industrialisation of Australia”.

 

“I worry that at some point we’ll be so dependent upon supply chains outside of this country that in a strategic crisis or a war, we’re completely cut off and alone and unable to feed our people, fuel our economy and maintain civic order,” he said.

 

“Because once the panic sets in, it’s very hard to arrest. That’s the thing that I really worry about, that with power prices surging, with a lot of our industry offshoring, with diminished business investment into advanced manufacturing in this country, we become a supplicant state and vulnerable to coercion.

 

“I would love to see the re-industrialisation of Australia so we can make stuff, so we can refine our own fuel, but also because, and I think this is what’s happening in the (United) States as well, there’s actually meaningful work.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 2:32 a.m. No.23032033   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23032032

 

2/2

 

After comfortably beating Labor in Canning, Mr Hastie said it was time to stop forcing people into universities if they can find meaningful work that doesn’t “saddle them with a heap of debt”.

 

Mr Hastie, who wants more people in parliament with real-world experience, said big tech and corporates should not be allowed to “push us around” and compromise Australia’s sovereignty.

 

“They have a huge say on our political system, whether we like it or not. And these are the questions that both parties, all parties need to answer going forward.”

 

On the four enterprise institutions of family, the home, education and small business, Mr Hastie said “I believe that our freedoms are best lived out in association and in relationship with others”.

 

“I’m a big believer in those little platoons and I’m not an abstract sort of person. I’m not an abstract Libertarian. (On the four enterprise institutions) I think that’s where we get to express ourselves, grow, develop, take risk, and I think that’s where the Liberal Party really needs to focus on … to get the country going again.”

 

Mr Hastie said before the party looks at its social media performance and campaign infrastructure, it must identify “who are the forgotten people of 2025?”.

 

“We’ve first of all got to have a vision and an identity as a party. I think a lot of (Gen Z and Millennials) are activist voters because the system isn’t working for them, and so they want to drop the system.”

 

“The question I think is how do we turn them from activist voters to prudential voters? And I think you become a prudential voter once you have something to fight for and conserve.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/andrew-hastie-declares-desire-to-lead-the-liberal-party/news-story/4070333da9f259ea114b59c158bf1ad9

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4arRDMt38TY

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 2:43 a.m. No.23032040   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2042 >>2138

>>22986131

‘Swamp creature’ exit: Babet to quit politics after praising Kanye West’s Heil Hitler track, slamming ‘mentally ill’ left

 

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - May 13, 2025

 

1/2

 

United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet says he’ll quit politics in 2028 to avoid becoming a “swamp creature” – but not before unleashing a late-night ­tirade in which he endorsed Kanye West’s Heil Hitler track and said he’d rather associate with neo-Nazis than “mentally ill” left-wing Australians.

 

The Victorian senator, who has a history of incendiary social media posts, told his followers in an Instagram story that the American rapper’s song Heil Hitler was his favourite of the week.

 

“All I said was it was a good song, right?” Senator Babet said.

 

“I like Kanye West. He’s a great artist … If someone else doesn’t like what he puts out, don’t buy it. Don’t listen to it. But don’t you f*cking dare tell me what I can and can’t listen to.”

 

He rejected accusations of anti-Semitism and said attempts to label him a Nazi were “f*cking bullshit”.

 

“If they’re going to try and associate me with being a Nazi – a brown immigrant from Africa – that’s f*cking bullshit. You know it. I know it,” he said.

 

West, who also goes by the name “Ye”, became one of the most influential musicians of his generation, until he made no secret of his admiration for Adolf Hitler in a series of social media posts on Elon Musk’s X platform.

 

The multi-award winning artist released a video for Heil Hitler on his X account last week and received more than 8½ million views from his 33 million loyal ­followers.

 

Senator Babet also defended a separate Instagram post in which he said he would “rather hang out” with members of the neo-Nazi National Socialist Network than with the “baby-killing, murdering, leftists”.

 

Asked to clarify the comment, he claimed it was made “tongue in cheek” but said he still stood by the sentiment. “There’s also truth to that,” he said. “Do you think I would want to hang out with baby-killing, murdering, leftists, absolute backwards, mentally ill, retarded, left-wing turds?”

 

In the same breath, he claimed he wouldn’t associate with the NSN either: “They want to f*cking deport me … because I’m brown. So obviously it’s tongue in cheek. I wouldn’t hang out with them, and they wouldn’t hang out with me, either.”

 

He went on to describe Australian progressive voters as “Greens voters that are mentally ill” and accused them of wanting to “tear down the family”, “do gender mutilating surgery on children” and “put kids on ­puberty blockers”.

 

When asked what he would say to Jewish Australians offended by his posts, Senator Babet refused to apologise. “I can listen to whatever music I like,” he said.

 

“If they want to be offended because Kanye West released a song, don’t download the song … But don’t tell me as a grown man what I can and can’t listen to.

 

“I think it’s a good song and I’m going to be buying his album. Does that make me a Nazi? No, I’m not a Nazi. I just like his music.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 2:44 a.m. No.23032042   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23032040

 

2/2

 

Senator Babet also revealed he was likely to quit politics after his first term in the Senate ends in 2028. “I have no desire to become a career politician,” he said. “I don’t want to become one of those swamp creatures, one of those swamp dwellers. I want to do my one term and I want to go.”

 

The comments have triggered furious condemnation from ­Australian Jewish leaders, who ­accused the Victorian senator of glorifying Hitler and anti-Semitism.

 

Chairman of the Anti-Defamation Commission Dvir Abramovich, who successfully campaigned to prevent Ye from entering Australia, said Senator Babet’s comments amounted to a public meltdown of moral responsibility.

 

“When a federal parliamentarian publicly declares that a track titled ‘Heil Hitler’ is his favourite of the week, alarm bells shouldn’t be ringing – they should be deafening,” Dr Abramovich said.

 

“Hitler is not a meme or a punch­line. His name stands for genocide, mass murder, gas chambers. It is carved into the bones of six million Jews and millions more victims. And now, a senator is casually promoting that name like it’s just another track in a playlist.

 

“And if that wasn’t stomach-churning enough, this same elected official says he’d rather associate with a neo-Nazi group than with Australians he dis­agrees with.”

 

Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Alex Ryvchin questioned why the senator felt the need to publicly express admiration for a song ­titled Heil Hitler, created by an artist widely associated with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories.

 

“Senator Babet is trying to position himself as a martyr for free speech merely standing up for the right to listen to the music of his choice. No one denied this right. No one sought to edit his playlist,” Mr Ryvchin said.

 

“Perhaps the better question is who was he trying to impress in making these observations about his taste in music. These sorts of stunts might get clicks and maybe votes in the US, but our politics and politicians should be better than that.”

 

President of the Zionist Federation of Australia Jeremy Leibler said Senator Babet’s unhinged comments were offensive and un-Australian. “There is absolutely nothing ‘tongue in cheek’ about a sitting MP endorsing neo-Nazis, glorifying anti-Semitism, and using slurs to attack minorities – it’s a dog whistle,” Mr Leibler said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/swamp-creature-exit-babet-to-quit-politics-after-praising-kanye-wests-heil-hitler-track-slamming-mentally-ill-left/news-story/3eb865d8af5878b8e95aceeb18580202

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 2:56 a.m. No.23032055   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2056 >>2067 >>5840 >>2845 >>3159 >>4566 >>3570 >>3619 >>0778 >>0783 >>0792 >>0800 >>0805 >>0815 >>0830 >>5045 >>5059 >>4623 >>5018 >>8013 >>2267

>>22986131

>>22989198

>>23007467

Xi congratulates Anthony Albanese, calls on PM to work with China to promote ‘world peace’

 

WILL GLASGOW - 14 May 2025

 

1/2

 

President Xi Jinping has congratulated Anthony Albanese on his re-election, saying he wants to work with the Australian Prime Minister to strengthen their relationship and promote “world peace and stability”.

 

In a written message delivered on Tuesday as the Prime Minister was sworn in by Australia’s Governor-General, the Chinese leader said he had engaged in “in-depth discussions on strategic, comprehensive and directional issues” in his three meetings with Mr Albanese.

 

“These discussions led to important consensuses that have provided strategic guidance to improve and grow bilateral ties,” Mr Xi said, according to Chinese newsagency Xinhua.

 

The Chinese president said he was ready to work with Mr Albanese to “advance the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership in a steady fashion”.

 

“Strengthening co-operation between China and Australia is of great significance for achieving shared development and promoting world peace and stability,” said Mr Xi in comments that were also run on the front-page of Wednesday’s People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s leading newspaper.

 

China’s Premier Li Qiang also sent a congratulatory message, according to Xinhua, saying he wanted to work with the Prime Minister on promoting a “more mature, stable and fruitful China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership”.

 

The Prime Minister is expected to visit China later in the year. The warm comments underscore the notable improvement in the diplomatic relationship since 2022, even as polls find actions by China continue to stoke anxiety among a majority of Australians.

 

Weeks before the election, a People’s Liberation Army Navy flotilla circumnavigated Australia and conducted live fire drills in the Tasman Sea.

 

During the Albanese government’s first term, all of the trade bans on Australian exports to China previously worth $20 billion a year were unwound. A freeze on all ministerial contact which Beijing had imposed on the Morrison government was also lifted.

 

Chinese state media has welcomed the return of the Albanese government and called for it to conduct a “pragmatic China policy”.

 

“A sustained pragmatic and rational approach to China under Albanese 2.0 will help take the bilateral relationship to a new level of mutually beneficial co-operation,” the Global Times wrote in a recent editorial.

 

“Experience in recent years has shown that blindly following Washington’s lead and treating China as a strategic adversary has harmed Australia’s diplomatic independence and dealt real blows to its economy,” the Chinese party-state outlet said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 2:57 a.m. No.23032056   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23032055

 

2/2

 

Wang Zhenyu, a research fellow at the Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies at China Institute of International Studies, said “stabilising” relations with China was “one of Labor’s standout foreign policy achievements”.

 

“Since Albanese’s Labor Party came to power in May 2022, it has rolled back the previous Coalition’s anti-China stance and taken proactive measures to enhance dialogue with Beijing,” Mr Wang wrote this week.

 

“Under the direct engagement and strategic leadership of both countries’ leaders, China-Australia relations have bottomed out and rebounded, warming across the board.”

 

Mr Wang said Albanese’s Labor Party had “generally adopted a rational, restrained tone in all China-related statements” during the election campaign. The Prime Minister’s campaign commitment to end the ownership by a Chinese company of the Port of Darwin was not mentioned.

 

Some Chinese scholars have argued that the unpredictability of the Trump administration is creating opportunities for Beijing to strengthen relations with Canberra.

 

“Especially in a world filled with growing uncertainty, Australia wants to create more certainty by itself, rather than sitting back and waiting for external uncertainty to wreak havoc on Australia’s policy,” professor Chen Hong, director of the Australian Studies Centre at East China Normal University, recently told the Global Times.

 

After a flagrant intervention in the 2022 election, Beijing was much more restrained during the recent campaign.

 

However, editorials in state media offered insight into Beijing’s preferences. Before Albanese met President Xi at the G20 in Brazil last November, the party-state’s leading English language masthead, the China Daily, praised the Australian Prime Minister’s “strategic autonomy” and urged other leaders to use his approach as a “useful reference”.

 

In one of the few pieces published by Chinese state media during the election, the Global Times accused Dutton of “beating ‘the drums of war’ against China” – a phrase also used in a speech in Mandarin by NSW Labor MP Jason Yat-sen Li, a clip of which has been widely circulated among Chinese Australian voters on ­Chinese-owned social media sites WeChat and RedNote.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/xi-congratulates-anthony-albanese-calls-on-pm-to-work-with-china-to-promote-world-peace/news-story/ac2a2d07b9c40f4d731cd019183087c5

 

https://english.news.cn/20250513/614d505605ad427b8fc5fd5442fad3ad/c.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 3:03 a.m. No.23032067   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2068 >>5840 >>2267

>>23032055

OPINION: Why stable China ties are vital for Australia

 

Wang Zhenyu - May 13, 2025

 

1/2

 

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his ministers were sworn in for a second term on Tuesday after the Labor Party's landslide win in the national election. The new government's domestic and foreign policy directions have drawn widespread attention. Recently, Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan announced that she will lead a trade mission to China this September to hold in-depth talks on education, trade and culture. Allan emphasized, "In an era of tariffs and global economic uncertainty, I want to seize an opportunity for Victoria," adding, "We have an opportunity to turn a new page in our relationship with China."

 

Allan's comments precisely reflect the public mood revealed by this Australian election. In fact, the vote took place against a backdrop of unprecedented global uncertainty and a "cost-of-living crisis" at home. At the crucial final stage of the campaign, the US announced it would impose "reciprocal tariffs" on most of its trading partners - even its ally Australia. That move left Australian voters feeling cold, anxious, and resentful, and caused trust in Coalition leader Peter Dutton to plummet. In the end, the Coalition suffered a crushing defeat, and Dutton himself became the first opposition leader in nearly a century to lose his own seat.

 

In an uncertain world, people crave stability, and Australian electoral behavior is no different: In challenging times, voters tend to stick with the incumbent government. Over the past three years, the Albanese administration has been defined by cautious steadiness. It's fair to say that stabilizing relations with China has emerged as one of Labor's standout foreign policy achievements.

 

Since Albanese's Labor Party came to power in May 2022, it has rolled back the previous Coalition's anti-China stance and taken proactive measures to enhance dialogue with Beijing. Under the direct engagement and strategic leadership of both countries' leaders, China-Australia relations have bottomed out and rebounded, warming across the board. Exchanges in various fields have taken positive strides, and economic and trade flows have fully recovered - earning widespread support on both sides. Throughout the election campaign, Labor, as the governing party, maintained continuity in its China policy and generally adopted a rational, restrained tone in all China-related statements. This pragmatic, steady approach won the trust of voters.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 3:04 a.m. No.23032068   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23032067

 

2/2

 

Mainstream polling ahead of the election showed that voters were almost equally confident in Labor and the Coalition on relations with the US. However, on relations with China - especially on China policy - confidence in Labor outstripped the Coalition by a full 20 percentage points. This gap underscores Australians' stronger appetite for a healthy, stable China-Australia relationship and their expectation that China-Australia free trade will help shield the economy from the shocks of economic nationalism.

 

Following his re-election, Albanese faces the crucial task of boosting economic growth and stabilizing foreign relations. In this context, the strategic significance of the China-Australia relationship is heightened. China is Australia's largest export market, and maintaining a stable relationship with China - solidifying and expanding exports to China - is vital for the well-being of the Australian people and for Australia's economic resilience.

 

On a strategic level, China and Australia need to work together to uphold the international system centered around the United Nations (UN), firmly defend the rules-based international order, and maintain the multilateral trading system. Australian society is increasingly recognizing that China is a reliable market and a trustworthy partner in a world full of uncertainty, and the China-Australia relationship provides significant certainty for Australia.

 

It is also worth noting that local diplomacy as well as economic ties are important aspects of the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership and are sources of vitality for economic and trade cooperation between the two countries. The Australian Labor government has extensive experience in promoting local cooperation between the two countries. Protecting the enthusiasm for local diplomacy, creating a favorable policy environment for local economic and trade cooperation, and providing strong support for local diplomatic practice are also essential.

 

In this election, the Australian people ultimately chose the Labor Party, the side of certainty facing an uncertain world, based on their expectations of policy stability and continuity. The Labor government now has more reason to adhere to an independent foreign policy and to work toward the steady and sustained growth of China-Australia relations. In this way, the two countries can provide a more stable and favorable policy environment for mutually beneficial economic and trade cooperation, striving to bring more tangible benefits to both countries and their people.

 

The author is an associate research fellow at the Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies at China Institute of International Studies. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn

 

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202505/1333966.shtml

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 14, 2025, 3:12 a.m. No.23032082   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0001 >>2186

>>23024200

Australian labourer Caleb List feared dead in Ukraine

 

Andrew Greene - 14 May 2025

 

A Queensland labourer who travelled to Ukraine three years ago to join the fight against Russia's invasion is feared to have been recently killed in battle, but authorities are yet to locate his remains.

 

Sources in Ukraine have told the ABC that former Gladstone resident Caleb List, who signed up with Ukraine's armed forces in 2022, is believed to have died last month during heavy fighting in the Kharkiv region.

 

In an interview in 2023 with German international public broadcaster Deutsche Welle (DW), the young Australian outlined his motivation for volunteering with Ukraine's Foreign Legion shortly after President Vladimir Putin launched the invasion.

 

"I wanted to test myself; I wanted to join the French Foreign Legion, I wanted to push myself to the extreme — so I came here with the same motivation, and I've basically done that and now I just do this because it's the only thing I'm really good at," he told DW.

 

During the interview, the soldier who was previously rejected by the Australian Army, described his experience serving alongside other international recruits in Ukraine's Foreign Legion.

 

"When you go to a Ukrainian unit you notice the whole place is clean, they have people who cook and just set up and it's nice so when you come off mission the place is nice, it's spotless," he said.

 

"With the [foreign] legion because they're new and new people, and because people leave and come back, they remake a lot of the mistakes — so the place is sometimes dirty, it's not as well organised, they'll leave stuff behind."

 

Feared dead

 

A figure connected to Ukraine's Armed Forces has told the ABC Mr List is believed to have been killed by artillery fire in heavily contested territory near the city of Izyum late last month, but his remains have not yet been recovered by his unit.

 

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) has declined to comment on the case, but in a statement, it reminded Australians that travel to Ukraine was considered extremely dangerous.

 

"The Australian government has consistently advised Australians not to travel to Ukraine or Russia since Russia's full-scale invasion began in February 2022," a DFAT spokesperson told the ABC.

 

Before travelling to Europe, Mr List worked as a trade assistant at Queensland's Yarwun refinery.

 

While at school he joined the army cadets but his subsequent application to become an Australian soldier was rejected.

 

This week the ABC confirmed former Australian soldier Nick Parsons was killed in Ukraine earlier this month while working for a charity organisation dedicated to removing land mines from the war-torn country.

 

On Monday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese expressed his "deepest condolences and sympathies" to Mr Parsons' family, whom he did not name citing DFAT advice, while reminding Australians to follow official warnings and not travel to Ukraine.

 

Asked about Mr List on Wednesday, the PM said the report of his death was "deeply troubling" and again expressed best wishes to his family while repeating the warning.

 

"There is a travel warning in place for a reason. Australians should not be travelling to Ukraine. It is dangerous, and people should not follow that advice."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-14/australian-tradie-caleb-list-feared-dead-in-ukraine/105288584

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 15, 2025, 2:14 a.m. No.23035918   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5926 >>5808 >>2138

>>22986131

>>23002826

>>23007460

Larissa Waters chosen as new Greens leader

 

Tom Crowley - 15 May 2025

 

Larissa Waters has been chosen as the new federal Greens leader, replacing Adam Bandt.

 

The Greens held a party room meeting in Melbourne today to select a leader following the shock loss of Adam Bandt.

 

The race was between Mehreen Faruqi, Sarah Hanson-Young and Senator Waters. A Greens source told the ABC the role was decided by "consensus".

 

Senator Faruqi, who is from New South Wales, was chosen as deputy and Senator Hanson-Young, from South Australia, was chosen as manager of business in the Senate.

 

"I feel so strengthened by the sentiment of the room and by this amazing team," Senator Waters told reporters after the meeting.

 

"We've got a lot of work to do because people are really hurting and the planet is hurting, and we need a parliament that actually delivers for people and has the courage and the boldness and the heart to deliver some help to people."

 

A disappointing election campaign saw the minor party lose three of its four seats in the lower house after a modest drop in its national share of the first preference vote.

 

But the party will again exert significant influence in the Senate, where it has retained its 11 seats and is likely to be in the balance of power, meaning Labor could pass legislation with its support alone.

 

'We'll be back', says Waters

 

Senator Waters paid tribute to Mr Bandt, calling him a "wonderful leader".

 

"We miss him desperately … We hope to welcome him back, I can't strong-arm him just yet, but I intend to. And we intend as a party to continue to grow."

 

She also signalled the party would not abandon the lower house even though it was now a "Senate-dominated team".

 

"The Greens are in the two-party preferred now in more seats than ever before. So folks, we'll be back."

 

Senator Waters was first elected as a senator for Queensland in 2010, making her the second longest-serving member of the Greens party room behind Senator Hanson-Young.

 

She was most recently the party's Senate leader and was also a co-deputy for several years, acting as spokesperson for several portfolios including women, democracy, and climate.

 

She will become the fifth person to lead the Greens in the federal parliament, following Bob Brown, Christine Milne, Richard Di Natale and Adam Bandt.

 

Nick McKim was chosen as Senate whip, and Penny Allman-Payne as deputy whip, defeating Dorinda Cox eight votes to four.

 

Senator Waters signalled a "firm but constructive" approach to dealing with the government in the next parliament: "People elected us to get sh*t done, and that's what we intend to do."

 

Senator Hanson-Young said there were "no more excuses for being timid. People are hurting, the planet is hurting … People expect this parliament to get things done."

 

Senator Faruqi said the Greens should demand "more, not less" from the party.

 

Asked about media reports that Lidia Thorpe was eyeing a return to the party she quit over her opposition to the Voice referendum, Senator Waters said the speculation was "concocted".

 

"I'm not sure she wants that."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-15/larissa-waters-greens-leader/105296840

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 15, 2025, 2:20 a.m. No.23035926   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5808 >>2138

>>23035918

Greens new leader Larissa Waters, deputy Mehreen Faruqi double down on Gaza

 

Olivia Ireland and Rachel Eddie - May 15, 2025

 

Newly elected Greens leader Larissa Waters and deputy Mehreen Faruqi insist the party will maintain its focus on the Gaza war, as both senators said they would continue to condemn “genocide” in the war-torn territory.

 

The party’s 12 members spent almost two hours in a meeting on Thursday to decide the leadership structure after former leader Adam Bandt lost his Melbourne seat to Labor at the election on May 3.

 

The Greens lost three of its four House of Representatives seats – including the stunning defeat of Bandt – at the poll, as its national primary vote flatlined and party elders called into question the Greens’ “hypermilitant” agenda and the way it communicates with Australian voters.

 

But after the meeting to decide the leadership on Thursday, Waters and Faruqi warned the Albanese government that the minor party would not take a backward step, seeking to deliver an ultimatum to Labor about who it should work with in the Senate.

 

Waters, Faruqi, and fellow Greens senators Sarah Hanson-Young, Nick McKim and Penny Allman-Payne walked with arms linked to the press conference, as Waters said she felt strengthened by the sentiment in the room and called for action on the climate crisis, housing and the Israel-Palestine conflict.

 

“We will always be there calling out atrocities, calling out a genocide and standing strong on social justice and human rights,” Waters said.

 

“The Labor Party have a choice. They can work with us … and help people and protect nature, or they can choose to work with the Coalition. They’re going to need to pick because they don’t have the numbers in the Senate to pass the legislation that they want to work on.”

 

Faruqi shared Waters’ views, arguing migrant and multicultural communities supported the party’s strong stand against “the genocide in Gaza”.

 

“To the right-wing media, to the billionaires, to the big corporations and to the Albanese government, this is our message: We are not going to take a step backwards,” she said.

 

“On climate, on the environment, on housing and for justice, for Palestine, our voters have put us there to fight for people and the planet, and that is exactly what we will be doing … this is a moment for demanding more, not less.”

 

Hanson-Young was considered to be a contender for the leadership positions, but said she decided not to contest because she believed the team elected was the best offering. She will continue in her role as Greens manager of business.

 

“This team provides stability. This team provides the skills and the grunt that we are going to need,” she said.

 

Waters was elected unopposed. Senator Dorinda Cox ran for deputy leader, but Faruqi won that vote of 9 to 3. McKim will hold the position of party whip and Allman-Payne will be party room chair and deputy whip.

 

Cox was the first party member to leave the meeting, appearing to be consoled by a Greens staff member.

 

The party standing by its agenda from the previous parliament goes against recommendations made by senior party figures last week after Bandt’s shock defeat and the loss of two other lower house MPs.

 

Co-founder of the national Greens Drew Hutton last week slammed the party for shifting focus from its environmental roots.

 

“The Greens have experimented with what I would call a hypermilitant approach during the last three years,” Hutton told this masthead last week.

 

“What will broaden their base is if they lose this terrible way they have of expressing their moral superiority over everyone else and their refusal to talk meaningfully with ordinary Australians.”

 

Ian Cohen, the first Greens member elected to the NSW parliament, urged the Greens to revive its focus on conservation, arguing “the environment must be a priority”.

 

Waters said she had nothing negative to say about Bandt, but would lead the party differently.

 

“I’m a different person to Adam, I’ll take a different approach,” she said.

 

“I lead a really strong team, and we are committed to delivering … We will be firm but constructive under this government and any future government.”

 

A Queensland senator, Waters was first elected in 2010 and has been seen widely as a moderate voice in the party. She was co-deputy leader of the party from 2015 to 2022.

 

Before her time in parliament, Waters was a community environmental lawyer at the Environmental Defender’s Office in Queensland from 2002 to 2011.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/larissa-waters-elected-new-greens-leader-20250515-p5lzcc.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 15, 2025, 2:28 a.m. No.23035935   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5962 >>2186

>>22914045 (pb)

>>22986131

Australia PM Albanese meets Indonesia counterpart in first international visit since re-election

 

Ananda Teresia and Kirsty Needham - May 15, 2025

 

JAKARTA, May 15 (Reuters) - Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese held talks with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto on defence cooperation and global trade on Thursday, describing Jakarta as an "indispenable partner" on his first international visit since his re-election.

 

Albanese, sworn into office on Tuesday after his centre-left Labor party won an increased majority in parliament, said his visit showed the priority Canberra placed on defence and economic ties with Jakarta.

 

"Indonesia is an indispensable partner for Australia," he said in opening remarks, meeting with Prabowo and ministers at the Presidential Palace.

 

He urged Prabowo to forge closer defence ties with Australia, after an agreement was struck last year covering maritime security, counter-terrorism and disaster response.

 

"Security is built on the sovereignty of every nation and the rules that govern all nations," he said when the two leaders addressed the media after their meeting.

 

Indonesia committed to completing the ratification of the defence agreement, Prabowo said.

 

"We will continue discussing the opportunities to improve and increase cooperation in defence sector," he said.

 

Trade and investment, food security, energy transition and critical minerals were also discussed, Prabowo said.

 

"We also invite Australia to participate more in our economy. It is important to strengthen such cooperation amid global economy uncertainty," he added.

 

Australia wants to increase economic ties with Southeast Asia, as it seeks to diversify export markets to reduce reliance on China, and in response to trade uncertainty caused by U.S. President Donald Trump's tariffs.

 

Albanese was welcomed to the palace by dozens of soldiers on horseback, around 3,000 schoolchildren waving flags, and a military ceremony, according to the president's office.

 

Indonesia dismissed reports last month that Russia had requested to base military aircraft in the archipelago's easternmost province of Papua, about 1,200 km (750 miles) north of the Australian city of Darwin, where a U.S. Marine Corps rotational force is based for six months of the year.

 

"Indonesia's answer is no, they've made it very clear," Albanese told reporters earlier on Thursday when asked about the matter, which had drawn attention during Australia's election campaign.

 

Russia will try to increase its influence in the region and Australia is responding by building ties with neighbours including Indonesia, Albanese added.

 

Australian Strategic Policy Institute senior analyst for defence, Euan Graham, said the Australia-Indonesia relationship has "avoided serious crisis for more than a decade, cooperation continues to move forward incrementally and there is greater stability than before".

 

Yet wide differences remain, he added.

 

"Jakarta sees China and Russia as vectors of opportunity more than threats and views the U.S. and China primarily through the same lens of great power rivalry. That's largely at odds with Canberra's world view," Graham said.

 

Indonesia is projected to be the fifth largest economy in the world by the end of the next decade.

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/australia-pm-albanese-meet-indonesia-counterpart-first-international-visit-since-2025-05-15/

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 15, 2025, 2:49 a.m. No.23035962   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5965 >>2186

>>23035935

Prabowo’s warm words for Albanese are tinged by a Russian shadow

 

Zach Hope - May 15, 2025

 

1/2

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will back Indonesia’s inclusion in a free-trade deal that includes countries such as Japan, Canada and Mexico, in what would be a boost to the nation’s economy and further bolster its ties to Australia.

 

In his first foreign visit since his May 3 election win, Albanese declared in Jakarta that he would support Indonesia’s bid to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership as well as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

 

“This is the fastest-growing region of the world in human history, and Indonesia is central to that growth,” he said, before Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto, a former special forces commander with a murky human rights record, personally drove him to a banquet on a golf buggy.

 

Earlier, Albanese railed against Russia during a news conference before meeting with Prabowo, who visited Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin last year as president-elect.

 

Their meeting comes weeks after respected military website Janes reported that Russia had lodged a formal request to base warplanes in Indonesia’s easternmost province, Papua, just 1400 kilometres from the Australian mainland – a report Indonesia’s Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin later denied.

 

“Russia, of course, will try to increase its influence,” Albanese said, while dodging questions about what Moscow had or had not asked of Prabowo and the Indonesians.

 

“We make very clear our position when it comes to Russia around the world – be it the brutal invasion of Ukraine, its interference in cybersecurity issues as well, its tolerance of criminal organisations that have been involved in that – are anathema to our values.”

 

Bound by geography

 

Albanese and Prabowo are both at the beginning of what will likely be a years-long co-existence inside an already-changed world and region, and geography and circumstance can be a powerful binder.

 

But while these vastly different men have some common interests and concerns – an unpredictable United States being just one – they diverge on others, including Indonesia’s ties with Russia.

 

Prabowo likes the proverb, “one thousand friends are too few, a single enemy is too many” – a clear expression of his country’s long tradition of not picking sides – and since his inauguration in October last year, Prabowo has taken this seriously, at least publicly.

 

His Kremlin visit last year came as Russia continued its invasion of Ukraine, and while he has also visited Australia and dozens of other countries, the newly elected leader of the world’s third-largest democracy cosying up to a warmongering dictator was uncomfortable viewing for many in the West.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 15, 2025, 2:51 a.m. No.23035965   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23035962

 

2/2

 

Russia and Indonesia held their first-ever bilateral military drills soon after Prabowo formally assumed the presidency. Then, in February, he welcomed Putin’s top security official, Sergei Shoigu, to Jakarta, just as he did Albanese this week.

 

This is the context behind the not-inconsiderable alarm in Australia when Jane's reported that Russia had requested an airbase in Papua. Indonesia’s selective denial of that report does not mean Moscow has not asked – it would dearly love a foothold in South-East Asia.

 

Speculation also remains – even if erroneous – that the Russians may have walked away from meetings with Prabowo or other officials feeling good about the prospects of future co-operation on this rather aggressive level.

 

Moscow’s ambassador to Indonesia, Sergei Tolchenov, did not deny the discussions had taken place when he wrote an article in the Jakarta Post last month, in which he told Australian politicians and academics that it was none of their business what Russia and Indonesia did together.

 

Australia, which makes the Americans comfortable in the Northern Territory, should look in the mirror, he said.

 

The reality is that Indonesia’s doctrine of non-alignment prevents Russia from plonking planes in Papua or elsewhere. This prescient point was likely discussed in the Prabowo-Albanese meeting at Merdeka Palace on Thursday, alongside matters of trade, counter-terrorism, people smuggling and a range of others in which the two nations are seeking closer co-operation.

 

“I think the main point [of the visit] is starting to build a personal relationship,” Australian National University associate professor Marcus Mietzner said.

 

“While both Prabowo and Albanese acted during the congratulatory phone call by the Indonesian president, which was put on social media, as if the two were best friends, the reality is that they are only acquainted.

 

“For Albanese, it will be crucial to get Prabowo interested in Australia. His predecessor, Joko Widodo, wasn’t paying much attention to Australia, and early indications are that Prabowo, too, needs impulses to look at Australia as anything more than just a geographical neighbour.”

 

The prime minister will fly out tomorrow for Rome, where Albanese will attend the inauguration of Pope Leo XIV.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/prabowo-s-warm-words-for-albanese-are-tinged-by-a-russian-shadow-20250515-p5lzcd.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 16, 2025, 5:58 a.m. No.23041388   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1393 >>1418 >>7527 >>9997 >>4587 >>2786 >>2187

>>22964101

>>22964102

>>22977695

Ben Roberts-Smith loses appeal over war crimes judgment

 

Michaela Whitbourn and Sarah McPhee - May 16, 2025

 

1/2

 

After a seven-year defamation fight and tens of millions of dollars in legal costs, former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has failed in his bid to overturn a landmark decision that found he committed war crimes in Afghanistan.

 

The former Special Air Service corporal launched a court challenge to his comprehensive loss against The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald after a marathon defamation trial that was billed as a test of public interest reporting and a quasi war crimes investigation.

 

But the Full Court of the Federal Court – Justices Nye Perram, Anna Katzmann and Geoffrey Kennett – unanimously dismissed his appeal on Friday and ordered him to pay the newspapers’ costs. Roberts-Smith was not in court to hear the judgment being delivered.

 

The ruling was touted by Nine, the publisher of The Age and the Herald, as an “emphatic win” for investigative journalism.

 

In a 2023 decision, Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko upheld the newspapers’ truth defence and found Roberts-Smith was complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners while deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.

 

The appeal court said in a summary of its decision that “we are unanimously of the opinion that the evidence was sufficiently cogent to support the findings that [Roberts-Smith] … murdered four Afghan men”.

 

Besanko’s decision was made to the civil standard, on the balance of probabilities, rather than the higher criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt.

 

“I continue to maintain my innocence and deny these egregious spiteful allegations,” Roberts-Smith, a Victoria Cross recipient, said in a statement after the decision.

 

“We will immediately seek to challenge this judgment in the High Court of Australia.”

 

The appeal hearing ran for 10 days in February last year – following a 110-day trial in 2021-22 and a 726-page judgment – and the parties had been awaiting the decision for more than a year.

 

The appeal court noted Besanko was “satisfied, contrary to [Roberts-Smith’s] … account, that the people whose deaths he caused, procured or agreed to were protected by the laws of armed conflict”.

 

“In the course of his reasons, his Honour made numerous adverse findings about the credibility of [Roberts-Smith’s] … evidence and that of witnesses called on his behalf who had testified that the killings were legitimate.

 

“In this appeal none of the adverse credit findings are challenged.”

 

Some of the appeal court’s reasons for its decision will not be made public because they contain national security information, but a portion of the judgment known as the open court reasons will be released within days.

 

“In order to give the Commonwealth two working days to examine the open court reasons to ensure there has been no inadvertent disclosure of national security information, the open court reasons will be impounded until 5pm next Tuesday,” Perram said.

 

The court made a non-publication order over the open court reasons “until either the Commonwealth notifies the court and the parties that it has no objection to publication … or 4pm on 20 May, 2025, whichever is earlier”.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 16, 2025, 6 a.m. No.23041393   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23041388

 

2/2

 

Top silk Bret Walker, SC, acting for Roberts-Smith, told the appeal court last year that “the heart of our case” was that “weight is to be given to the presumption of innocence”.

 

He said the evidence marshalled by The Age and the Herald in defence of the lawsuit fell short of the “exactness of proof” that was expected.

 

But Nicholas Owens, SC, who was acting for the newspapers and is now a Federal Court judge, told the appeal court that the case was “not like a detective novel” where there could be multiple explanations for the killings.

 

He said that, in general, “we know who killed” the four Afghan men in question and “we know how they were killed” – by gunshot.

 

“The only dispute is in effect the immediate circumstances,” Owens said.

 

In a surprise development in March this year, a “secret recording” emerged of The Age and the Herald’s investigative journalist Nick McKenzie speaking to a witness in the defamation case, dubbed Person 17, before she gave evidence in the trial in 2022. McKenzie was an author of the articles at the centre of the lawsuit, which was launched almost seven years ago in August 2018.

 

That recording prompted Roberts-Smith to apply to the court to reopen his appeal before the court’s decision was delivered to allow the recording to be admitted into evidence.

 

The court unanimously dismissed the application to reopen the appeal on Friday, and ordered Roberts-Smith to pay the newspapers’ costs.

 

Tory Maguire, Nine’s managing director of publishing, said the decision was an “emphatic win for Nine” and a “great day for investigative journalism”.

 

“Nine has unswervingly backed our reporters and editors throughout this matter, reinforcing our longstanding commitment to quality journalism in the public interest,” she said.

 

“The court has confirmed the stories published by The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald resulting from an investigation by award-winning reporters Nick McKenzie and Chris Masters have been proven true.”

 

Maguire said the decision was also vindication for the SAS soldiers who “demonstrated courage by boldly speaking the truth about what happened in Afghanistan”.

 

“The court did not accept there was any breach of legal privilege by Nick McKenzie and dismissed Roberts-Smith’s recent attempt to disrupt the appeal and ordered he pay Nine’s costs related to this,” Maguire said.

 

“Nick is an outstanding journalist, respected by his editors, colleagues at Nine and peers in newsrooms across the country.”

 

McKenzie said: “I want to pay tribute and express my deep gratitude to the brave SASR soldiers who not only fought for their country in Afghanistan but fought for the Australian public to learn the truth: that Ben Roberts-Smith is a war criminal.

 

“I also want to acknowledge the victims of Roberts-Smith, including the Afghan children and women who have lost their fathers and husbands who were murdered on the directions of Roberts-Smith.”

 

Roberts-Smith said he had “only ever asked for a fair and just hearing – that has not occurred”.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/ben-roberts-smith-defamation-appeal-judgment-result-outcome-today-war-crimes-allegations-20250514-p5lz4q.html

 

https://www.fedcourt.gov.au/services/access-to-files-and-transcripts/online-files/ben-roberts-smith-appeal

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 16, 2025, 6:06 a.m. No.23041418   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7527 >>2187

>>23041388

The seven words that ended Ben Roberts-Smith’s $1.5m appeal bid

 

Harriet Alexander - May 16, 2025

 

The dismissal of Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation appeal was clinical in its execution.

 

One by one, Federal Court Justice Nye Perram, on behalf of the full bench, brushed the disgraced soldier’s claims into a dustpan, and tipped them into the bin.

 

Dozens of sleepless nights, thousands of hours of work, millions of dollars in costs.

 

Lawyers estimate Roberts-Smith’s bid to overturn the court’s 2023 finding that he was a war criminal set both sides back a combined $4 million, coming on top of the $30 million spent on the original 110-day hearing.

 

A late bid to re-open the appeal last month alone contributed $1.5 million to the total.

 

Perram dispensed of it in seven words: “The application should be dismissed with costs.”

 

This judgment was not preceded by the same white-knuckled wait as for the original judgment, when a heaving courtroom sweated over whether the quietly spoken Justice Anthony Besanko would be persuaded that the strength of the evidence met the gravity of the accusations.

 

Besanko could have been forgiven for dismissing even a strong suspicion that the decorated Afghanistan veteran was a war criminal. Much bolder to leap from private intuition to public certainty.

 

Then Roberts-Smith’s team had turned up to the judgment in force, from the loftiest barrister to the merest legal deckhand, matched on the other side of the court by Nine’s in-house and out-of-house lawyers, a silken team of barristers, a phalanx of editors and the two journalists at the centre of the case: Nick McKenzie and Chris Masters.

 

Only Roberts-Smith was nowhere to be seen.

 

This occasion was more drizzle than sizzle, and the attendees and absentees spoke volumes about their predictions on which way the Full Court of the Federal Court would rule.

 

Roberts-Smith again elected not to meet his fate; he is rumoured to be overseas. His lead barrister, Arthur Moses SC, was also conspicuous in his absence.

 

He sent in his place a junior barrister who nobody remembered attending any of the hearings, behind whom sat Roberts-Smith’s longstanding solicitor Monica Allen.

 

Nine sent a full team of lawyers, but no McKenzie, who had been wounded by the emergence of a secret recording of him claiming to Roberts-Smith’s ex-lover that he had access to the ex-soldier’s legal strategy.

 

Roberts-Smith’s lawyers argued that the recording was sufficient grounds to re-open the appeal, and for the first time in his 23-year career, McKenzie was subjected to cross-examination in court. His integrity, and that of Nine’s legal team who were accused of using improperly accessed material, was on the line.

 

But in dismissing the application, the Federal Court exposed the recording as a siren call.

 

Roberts-Smith had dared to hope that it would discredit his nemesis McKenzie, change the course of the litigation and lead to his redemption.

 

Instead, he was another million dollars worse off, and the evidence that he committed war crimes in Afghanistan did not budge. Not one jot.

 

Because the next words uttered by Perram were that it was the unanimous view of the full bench of the Federal Court that the whole appeal should be dismissed, and one side of the room seemed to swell.

 

As Perram left the bench, Minter Ellison solicitor Peter Bartlett, who has been handling the matter for The Age, the Sydney Morning Herald and the Canberra Times since its inception, emitted small noises of relief. Some of the lawyers were in tears. They milled and hugged.

 

Roberts-Smith’s lawyers gave tight smiles and left the building.

 

Each of the four murders that Besanko held to have occurred in his original judgment remained intact. And so did the integrity of McKenzie, whose evidence was found to obtain no significant contradictions or implausibilities.

 

Roberts-Smith released a statement outlining his intention to appeal to the High Court.

 

“I continue to maintain my innocence and deny these egregious spiteful allegations,” he said.

 

Two winters have passed since the Federal Court found that on the balance of probabilities, Roberts-Smith was a murderer and a war criminal.

 

The folk who sleep in the St James train tunnels not 100 metres from where Masters and McKenzie stood on the steps of the court and claimed vindication have swapped out their sleeping bags for pop-up tents.

 

McKenzie has moved on to stories of corruption elsewhere. Nicholas Owens SC, who fought the original case for the newspapers, has been appointed a judge.

 

Roberts-Smith is still shaking his fist at the sky.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/national/the-seven-words-that-ended-ben-robert-smith-s-1-5m-appeal-bid-20250516-p5lzqh.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 5:42 a.m. No.23045675   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5683 >>3629 >>3647 >>8414 >>2187

>>23012385

>>23012408

Australia steps up bid for Pope Leo visit as PM visits Rome for inauguration

 

David Crowe - May 17, 2025

 

1/2

 

Rome: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met Catholic Church leaders in Rome ahead of the inauguration mass for Pope Leo XIV, joining them at a sanctuary church that welcomes visiting Australians.

 

Albanese met Sydney Archbishop Anthony Fisher and Melbourne Archbishop Peter Comensoli at the church centre, which also houses Australians who have come to Rome for the mass.

 

The church, called the Sanctuary of our Lady of Pompeii, has a connection with Pope Leo because he was elected by cardinals on May 8, the feast day for Our Lady of the Rosary of Pompeii.

 

Albanese spoke briefly in the church’s rose garden, known as Domus Australia, about the importance of the inauguration mass for Australia’s 5 million Catholics.

 

Earlier, the nation’s top diplomat at the Vatican, Keith Pitt, was stepping up attempts to bring Pope Leo to Australia in the first papal visit in two decades, in a key message ahead of the inauguration Mass on Sunday to confirm the new pope in office.

 

The Australian ambassador-designate to the Holy See, also a former cabinet minister, Pitt was making the formal invitation one of the major priorities for the embassy as the new papacy begins.

 

In an interview ahead of the inauguration Mass, Pitt named issues ranging from climate change, artificial intelligence and child sexual abuse as areas where the Australian government would seek to work with the new pope.

 

He said Australia also wanted to work with Pope Leo and the Vatican on helping Pacific Island nations, a region with large numbers of Catholics.

 

“Part of the role of the embassy is to elevate, in the minds of those decision makers in the Vatican, why it’s so important that Pope Leo comes to Australia,” Pitt said.

 

“I think that this is a unique opportunity.

 

“So we’ll take every opportunity to continue to put forward that invitation and highlight why it’s important for the more than 5 million Catholics in Australia.”

 

Australia will host a global Catholic event, the International Eucharistic Congress, in Sydney in 2028, and church leaders hope Pope Leo will attend.

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said on May 9, hours after Pope Leo was elected by a conclave of the College of Cardinals, that he would invite the Pope to visit Australia for the congress.

 

Pitt is expected to have an audience with the Pope when he presents his diplomatic credentials to the Vatican, the formal step in being recognised as an ambassador to the small but highly influential state. Pitt resigned as a Nationals MP after 12 years in federal parliament when Albanese named him to the diplomatic post in February. He takes up a position role previously held by Tim Fischer, the former Nationals leader.

 

Pitt said his priority was to act on the prime minister’s invitation and make the case for the papal visit.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 5:44 a.m. No.23045683   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23045675

 

2/2

 

Pope Benedict XVI visited Australia for World Youth Day in 2008 and Pope Paul VI made the first papal visit to Australia in 1970 as part of a pilgrimage across Asia and the Pacific.

 

Pitt noted that Pope Leo’s first statement as pontiff was “peace be with you” and said this was aligned with Australia’s interest in ending conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine.

 

Pope Leo will mark the beginning of his pontificate in Rome on Sunday with a Mass that is expected to be attended by tens of thousands of people in St Peter’s Square.

 

Albanese arrived in Rome on Friday night, local time, and was due to attend the Mass with leaders including US Vice President J.D. Vance, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney.

 

Albanese said he may be able to meet Zelensky while in Rome.

 

Albanese will also see some of his extended family in Rome, although his office denied a news report saying he had invited his half-brother to join Australians at the Mass.

 

The Mass begins at 10am local time (6pm on Sunday AEST) and is expected to follow a visit by the Pope to St Peter’s tomb in the basilica, named after the first pope.

 

After the visit to the basilica, church leaders present the Pope with the pallium, a vestment that signifies his assumption of the papacy, and a fisherman’s ring, the symbol of the first apostles being “fishers of men” in the gospels.

 

While Pitt was a critic of Labor policy on energy during his time in parliament, he said his task as an ambassador was to represent Australian policy on climate change to the Vatican.

 

Pope Leo raised concerns about artificial intelligence in an address last Saturday about the threat to “human dignity, justice and labour” from technology that could undermine humanity.

 

Pitt said Australia and the Vatican could find some common interest in the global debate about technology given the federal government’s plan to restrict social media for people under 16 and set guidelines around artificial intelligence.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/it-s-so-important-australia-steps-up-bid-for-pope-leo-visit-as-pm-lands-in-rome-20250517-p5lzyz.html

 

 

Q Post #3155

 

Mar 20 2019 22:15:06 (EST)

 

Keep digging, Anons.

RACHEL CHANDLER IS KEY.

Q

 

https://qanon.pub/#3155

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 6:07 a.m. No.23045726   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5733 >>9366 >>3683 >>2189

>>22932371 (pb)

>>22932458 (pb)

Wong, Albanese attack ‘sham’ 13-year Russian prison sentence for Oscar Jenkins

 

Rob Harris - May 17, 2025

 

1/2

 

Foreign Minister Penny Wong says the Albanese government is appalled by the 13-year sentence in a Russian maximum-security prison handed to Australian Oscar Jenkins after he was convicted of fighting as a mercenary alongside Ukrainian forces.

 

The 33-year-old from Melbourne, captured in December last year while serving in Ukraine’s military, was found guilty by a court in the Russian-controlled Luhansk region of eastern Ukraine.

 

Russian authorities claimed Jenkins, a former biology teacher in China, was paid up to 800,000 rubles ($15,000) a month to participate in military operations against their troops in Ukraine. State-run media claimed he had “fully admitted his guilt”.

 

Wong condemned the outcome, saying: “The Australian government is appalled at the sham trial and 13-year sentence given to Australian man Oscar Jenkins.

 

“As a full-serving member of the regular armed forces of Ukraine, Mr Jenkins is a prisoner of war.

 

“The Australian government has made clear to Russia that Mr Jenkins must be given the protections afforded to him as a prisoner of war. Russia is obligated to treat him in accordance with international humanitarian law, including humane treatment.”

 

Wong’s comments were echoed hours later by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

 

“Let’s be very clear. This sentence by Russia is an outrage – it is a continuation of the way they have behaved, abrogating their responsibilities,” he said, speaking to reporters in Rome.

 

“This conflict began with them choosing to invade a sovereign nation, and their decision to abrogate their responsibility to uphold international law. We don’t believe this is a legitimate decision – [it is] by a legal process in Russia that is very politicised, as we know.”

 

Opposition home affairs spokesman James Paterson also labelled Jenkins’ sentence a “sham”, saying his treatment had been an “egregious” breach of international law.

 

Paterson said Jenkins was entitled to protections as a prisoner of war and said he hoped he was set free as part of a prisoner release exchange between Russia and Ukraine.

 

Jenkins, who was formally charged with mercenary activity in April, was shown in images and a video released by the prosecutor’s office standing in a glass cage, his hands behind his back and his expression despondent.

 

The court ruling, delivered on Friday, classified Jenkins’ actions as mercenary activity, meaning he was not entitled to prisoner-of-war protections under international law. He was ordered to be transferred to “a strict regime penal colony”. It is unknown whether he was provided with legal representation; such hearings have previously been referred to as “sham trials”.

 

Prosecutors claimed Jenkins arrived in Ukraine in February last year at the Ternopil recruiting centre, in western Ukraine, where, after training, he received uniforms, weapons and ammunition.

 

He was then sent to serve in the village of Shchurove in the Kramatorsk district.

 

They alleged he then fought against Russian forces in the Donbas region with the 402nd Separate Rifle Battalion, part of the 66th Separate Mechanised Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, until his capture near Makiyivka. The Kremlin maintains that foreign fighters in Ukraine are mercenaries, subject to criminal prosecution rather than the protections afforded to prisoners of war under the Geneva Convention.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 6:10 a.m. No.23045733   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23045726

 

2/2

 

Jenkins was filmed in December after his capture, bound and subjected to harsh interrogation by Russian forces.

 

In a video widely circulated online, he was shown being slapped and questioned about his role in the conflict and whether he was being paid to fight. The footage prompted international outrage and raised concerns over the treatment of foreign nationals in Russian custody.

 

Following reports that Jenkins had been killed while in captivity, the Australian government summoned the Russian ambassador in January to demand clarification.

 

However, new videos emerged in February showing Jenkins alive but visibly frail and possibly suffering from a broken arm. His appearance led to further concerns about his wellbeing while under Russian detention.

 

State media reported that during the trial, prosecutors blamed the Ukrainian Central Intelligence Agency for spreading “fake news” that Jenkins had been tortured and killed.

 

The Australian government has repeatedly called for Jenkins to be treated as a prisoner of war and afforded protections. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said last month his government would continue to make representations to the “reprehensible regime” of Russian President Vladimir Putin on behalf of Jenkins.

 

“We will stand up and use whatever avenues we have at our disposal to continue to make those representations,” he said.

 

The prosecution argued Jenkins had signed a contract with the Ukrainian Defence Ministry that offered him substantial compensation for his services in the war against Russia.

 

Human rights groups have voiced concerns over the legality and fairness of the trial, and there is speculation that Jenkins could become part of a prisoner exchange between Russia and Australia.

 

The Russian branch of the International Committee for the Protection of Human Rights has previously said that Jenkins might be released as part of a swap involving Russian spies Kira and Igor Korolev.

 

Jenkins’ sentencing follows the conviction in March of British national James Scott Rhys Anderson, who was jailed for 19 years by a Russian military court for his involvement in the conflict. Anderson’s conviction marked the first such sentence for a British national since the start of the war.

 

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has been approached for comment.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/oscar-jenkins-sentenced-to-13-years-in-russian-prison-after-fighting-for-ukraine-20250517-p5lzyy.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8nCfkFuvsEg

 

https://epp.genproc.gov.ru/web/gprf/mass-media/news?item=103658314

 

https://x.com/BPGCC177308/status/1923484231428169995

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 6:44 a.m. No.23045815   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2268

>>22989198

>>23007467

AFP will train Pacific peacekeepers to help counter China’s influence

 

CAMERON STEWART - May 16, 2025

 

The Australian Federal Police is boosting its role in the Pacific in the face of growing competition from China by agreeing to train Pacific island police to become UN peacekeepers.

 

The move comes at a time when China is aggressively trying to strike police co-operation deals with Pacific Island nations as a means to gain leverage over their strategic direction.

 

In response, the AFP is boosting its policing engagement across the Pacific Island region as part of Australia’s broader diplomatic push to prevent China establishing footholds in the region.

 

Beijing has criticised the AFP for having an “impure motive” to “contain China” in its growing push to forge closer links with ­Pacific island nations.

 

As part of its attempts to sideline China and forge closer relationships with the Pacific, the AFP is hosting the world’s first UN Police Peacekeeping Training course tailored specifically for the Pacific region.

 

The course, which started in Brisbane this week, brings together 100 police officers from across the Pacific and East Timor and aims to build a deployable, Pacific-led UN peacekeeping capability.

 

AFP Assistant Commissioner Nigel Ryan said the course would help “reinforce Australia’s role as a preferred partner of choice in the Pacific for sustained peace, security and prosperity in the region”.

 

Mr Ryan said the AFP’s presence in the Pacific had grown “exponentially” in recent years, and despite growing competition from China he believed that Australia was still the partner of choice in policing and security.

 

“It’s no secret that China has ambitions to increase their presence in the Pacific in the security space,” he told The Australian. “But we’ve got longstanding relationships going back decades with our Pacific partners, and they’re very strong relationships.

 

“We are part of the Pacific family and Australia is recognised as the partner of choice, particularly in the security space.”

 

AFP Deputy Commissioner Lesa Gale said the peacekeeping course provided “a powerful stage to amplify the region’s collective approach to policing and draw global attention to collaborations such as the Pacific Policing Initiative, which is a Pacific-led and Australia-backed initiative to strengthen peace and security.

 

The PPI, which was endorsed by Pacific Island leaders last year, has been criticised by China as having the “impure motive” of “containing China’s security presence in the region”.

 

“With an impure motive, the pact only exposes Australia’s attempt to intervene in regional countries’ security decision-making, and such manoeuvres prioritise US strategic blueprint while bringing limited, if any, benefits to Australia or Pacific Island Countries needs,” the state-owned Global Times said last year.

 

“Such an exclusive policing pact not only violates general principles in international relations but also infringes on PICs’ sovereignty to independently choose co-operation partners.”

 

China has stepped up its push to secure police co-operation deals across the region. It currently has police security agreements with Solomon Islands, Fiji, Vanuatu and Kiribati. Papua New Guinea turned down a Chinese proposal for a police agreement last year after pressure from Australia. In some countries like Solomon Islands and Fiji, both the AFP and Chinese police provide assistance to local police and security forces.

 

The AFP has lifted its presence in the Pacific to more than 100 AFP personnel stationed across the region to help fight transnational and cyber crime and provide specialist training to Pacific police forces.

 

The AFP chose to host the UN training course in response to a desire by Pacific nations to contribute more actively to international peacekeeping efforts.

 

“The inaugural (five week) course will significantly advance those ambitions, giving Pacific member nations a meaningful role internationally in helping shepherd nations from conflict to peace,” Ms Gale said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/afp-will-train-pacific-peacekeepers-to-help-counter-chinas-influence/news-story/3d5993ff6d1c34abb7548aa10b16e388

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pnibS9yawUI

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 6:53 a.m. No.23045840   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5844 >>2845 >>2268

>>23032055

>>23032067

Taiwan urges Australia to defy China on Trump-proofing trade pact

 

Matthew Knott - May 17, 2025

 

1/2

 

Taiwan is urging Australia to stare down opposition from Beijing and support its admission to a sweeping regional free trade pact to help buffer it from the volatility of Donald Trump’s tariff gyrations.

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced during a visit to Jakarta on Thursday that Australia will back Indonesia’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), but Taiwan’s request to join the pact has been stalled since 2021.

 

Australia is serving as the rotating chair of the 12-nation grouping this year, giving it responsibility for guiding the group’s activities and priorities.

 

“We definitely call for Australia’s support of Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP, which we see as the gateway to future trade,” Taiwan’s de facto ambassador to Australia, Douglas Hsu, said in an interview with this masthead.

 

Australia does not recognise Taiwan as a state, meaning its top envoy is known as the head of its economic and cultural office rather than an ambassador.

 

“Australia and Taiwan have a complementary trade partnership, we believe that we can meet the high standards of the CPTPP regulations and we have a good track record dealing with other trading partners.

 

“The CPTPP is a trade mechanism, so we definitely will urge all the members to review Taiwan’s case based on the merits instead of the geopolitics.”

 

Taiwan’s push to join the pact – which covers around 15 per cent of global trade – has been given increased impetus by Trump’s decision to announce a crushing 32 per cent tariff on all Taiwanese imports. The tariffs have since been suspended for 90 days alongside all the US president’s other reciprocal tariffs.

 

China – whose own application to join the partnership is under review – has fiercely opposed Taiwan being admitted to international trade pacts and multilateral bodies as it claims the self-governing democratic island as part of its sovereign territory.

 

Referring to China’s opposition to its membership bid, Hsu said several member states had “told us they suffer a kind of pressure from a country that is not currently in the CPTPP itself, so they have some hesitations to agree to let Taiwan in at the moment”.

 

Hsu praised Australia for backing Taiwan’s bid to be given observer status at the World Health Organisation despite Beijing’s opposition, declaring: “You can definitely stand firm against any kind of coercion.”

 

Hsu said that Taiwan had been an active member of the World Trade Organisation and APEC for decades, making it a natural fit for the CPTPP, which evolved from the Trans Pacific Partnership when the United States withdrew in 2017.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 6:54 a.m. No.23045844   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23045840

 

2/2

 

A spokesperson for the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said consensus was required among the 12 members of the trade pact for new entrants to be admitted.

 

“Australia and Taiwan have highly complementary economies and a valued trading relationship across industries including agriculture, energy and tourism,” the spokesperson said.

 

“Any economy seeking to join CPTPP must meet the agreement’s high standards, have a record of complying with international trade commitments, and gain consensus support from CPTPP members.”

 

Malaysia and Singapore are seen as some of the states most reluctant to support Taiwan’s bid because of their close ties to Beijing.

 

Costa Rica has been invited to join the pact, even though it submitted its application a year after Taiwan and China.

 

Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto on Thursday expressed his “appreciation and gratitude” to Albanese for agreeing to support his nation’s bid to join the CPTPP, which he believes would provide a major boost for Indonesian exporters.

 

Taiwan is Australia’s seventh-largest export destination, with Indonesia coming in at number 10.

 

Hsu said Taiwanese businesspeople were flocking to Australia to seek export opportunities, especially in the green energy sector.

 

“If they continue to do business with the United States they will have to deal with those tariff issues, so they have to find new market opportunities and Australia is definitely a good market for them,” he said.

 

Lien Yu-ping, a senior official from Taiwan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said in April that Australia’s tenure as CPTPP chair had opened an important window of opportunity for Taiwan to join the pact.

 

Lien said that, unlike Taiwan, China was clearly not qualified to join the grouping “given Beijing’s extensive use of subsidies and the lack of transparency of state-owned companies”.

 

Ratings agency S&P affirmed Taiwan’s AA+ long-term credit rating in April, praising the semiconductor powerhouse’s “vibrant and highly competitive electronics manufacturing sector”.

 

Albanese alarmed Taiwan in 2022 when he appeared to rule out Taiwanese entry into the pact by stating it was only for “recognised” nation states, rather than economies.

 

The text of the agreement makes clear that any state or separate customs territory may become a member, meaning Taiwan is eligible.

 

Hsu said Beijing had been intensifying its harassment of Taiwan, including by holding two days of war games in April featuring long-range, live-fire drills.

 

He said Taiwan was taking preparations for a possible Chinese invasion or blockade of the island “very seriously”, even though the prospect does not appear imminent.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/taiwan-urges-australia-to-defy-china-on-trump-proofing-trade-pact-20250516-p5lzpq.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 7:14 a.m. No.23045901   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5908

Sex abuse survivor urges Timor-Leste president not to pardon paedophile ex-priest Richard Daschbach

 

Vonia Vieira, Doug Dingwall and Nick Sas - 17 May 2025

 

1/2

 

A woman who survived sexual abuse at the hands of a convicted paedophile priest fears he will hurt her again if the Timor-Leste government succeeds in having him pardoned.

 

Defrocked priest Richard Daschbach, a United States citizen, was convicted by a Timor-Leste court in December 2021 after being found guilty of sexually abusing orphaned and disadvantaged young girls under his care.

 

The high-profile trial and conviction were the first of their kind in the staunchly religious nation, where about 97 per cent of the population identifies as Catholic.

 

Daschbach, now 88 years old, has had the strong support of Timor-Leste's Prime Minister Xanana Gusmão, who attended his 2021 trial and controversially celebrated Daschbach's birthday at the time.

 

This week it was revealed Timor-Leste's government had proposed that the ex-priest be pardoned and released from prison.

 

Mária, who Daschbach sexually abused when she was a child at the Topu Honis children's shelter in the country's remote west, is calling for Timorese President José Ramos-Horta to reject the government-backed proposal to release him.

 

"If he gets out, he could commit his evil deeds to other women," Mária, who the ABC has given a pseudonym for safety reasons, said.

 

"It looks like he will go back to the Topu Honis orphanage [where he committed his crimes] and could hurt our hearts as victims who have attended [his] trial in court."

 

Mr Ramos-Horta must decide whether to grant Daschbach's release by Tuesday, to coincide with the country's annual Independence Day celebrations.

 

It is a tradition for convicted criminals to receive pardons on that day.

 

The proposal to pardon Daschbach only four years into his 12-year prison term has faced a backlash from both advocates of victim-survivors and opposition MPs.

 

Legal aid groups in Timor-Leste have called on Mr Ramos-Horta to meet victim-survivors before making a decision on the matter.

 

Observers also warn the proposal to pardon Daschbach will retraumatise victim-survivors and send a dangerous message to Timor-Leste about child sexual abuse and gender-based violence.

 

"He was found guilty and admitted to terrible crimes against young girls," said Sara Niner, a Monash University senior lecturer who has researched Timor-Leste for 20 years.

 

"The man should die in jail."

 

'We will be afraid'

 

Mária said she and other victim-survivors lived in fear before Daschbach was convicted and imprisoned four years ago.

 

"We looked for people to hide us," she said.

 

"When he went to prison, we felt free, we were not afraid," she said.

 

But she fears that will change if he is released and says victim-survivors will suffer even more.

 

"If he does get out of prison, we'll be afraid again, because as victims, what we say, people won't believe us again," she said.

 

"People can provoke us again."

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 7:16 a.m. No.23045908   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23045901

 

2/2

 

Daschbach spent decades as a missionary in Timor-Leste's remote enclave of Oecusse after moving to the country in 1966, when it was a Portuguese colony.

 

He was a figure in the nation's fight for independence and was once highly regarded for founding the Topu Honis, or Guide To Life, children's shelters that cared for orphans and children and youth from impoverished families, people with disabilities, and women who fled domestic violence.

 

But Daschbach was expelled from his Catholic congregation in 2019 after admitting to sexual abuse of minors, and the previous year, he was expelled from the Church de Santo Antonio de Motael in the capital Dili.

 

He later faced charges of child sexual abuse, as well as child pornography and domestic violence.

 

Jurídico Social, which represents 15 survivors of sexual abuse committed by Daschbach, said Mr Ramos-Horta should meet the convicted paedophile's victims before deciding on a pardon.

 

"The sentence imposed reflects the court's assessment of what was legally just and proportionate, based on the facts of the case, the applicable law, the accused's advanced age, and the defence arguments presented in relation to the crimes committed," it said in a written statement.

 

"The sentence was upheld at the appeal level.

 

"Should [Mr Ramos-Horta] wish to hear the voices and perspectives of the victims regarding the proposal for a pardon or reduction of sentence, as required by law, the victims stand ready to meet with him."

 

Mária said she wanted to speak directly to Mr Ramos-Horta.

 

"We did not lie about it," she said.

 

"If the president wants to make a decision to release him from prison, then the president is saying he wants to make us suffer."

 

The ABC approached Mr Ramos-Horta and his office for comment.

 

'It will send a message'

 

Opposition MPs have voiced their condemnation of the government move to have Daschbach pardoned.

 

Fretilin Party MP Nurima Alkatiri said she was concerned about the impact it would have on victim-survivors.

 

"By hearing this, they most probably are living their traumas all over again," she said.

 

"This was a very serious crime and it was not easy for the victims or survivors to come forward and report it."

 

Dr Niner said the proposal to pardon Daschbach was not surprising given Mr Gusmão's previous support for him.

 

The ABC asked Mr Gusmão's office to clarify his role in the move to have Daschbach pardoned, but it did not respond to questions before deadline.

 

Dr Niner said the proposal sent the wrong message because Timor-Leste was just starting to speak about issues relating to sexual abuse.

 

"These things have been hidden and covered up," she said.

 

"It will send a message to the wider community that these sorts of crimes are pardonable … that it should be tolerated. And that it should be hidden and covered up."

 

Dr Niner said Mr Ramos-Horta should reject the proposed pardon.

 

She also said the government should withdraw it altogether.

 

"[We should be] thinking about the effect on the victim-survivors," Dr Niner said.

 

"These girls have survived and continue to rebuild their lives.

 

"Think about how this would affect them instead of focusing on a perpetrator of sexual abuse."

 

For Mária, there is an anxious wait until Mr Ramos-Horta makes a decision on Daschbach's future.

 

"I hope he doesn't get out from prison," she said.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-16/timor-leste-paedophile-priest-pardon-proposal-daschbach/105295730

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=Richard+Daschbach

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 7:45 a.m. No.23045988   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5996

>>22685705 (pb)

Victorian sisters abused by paedophile priest say High Court decision has halted quest for compensation

 

Richard Willingham - 14 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Sisters Bernie and Trish have not had a restful night since they were abused by a paedophile priest in the 1970s.

 

"You don't sleep afterwards like a normal human sleeps. You're never carefree again,'' Bernie said.

 

To sleep soundly, the sisters need to know no-one can come through their bedroom doors, so their husbands made them special wooden jams to lock them in place.

 

"You can have happy days, and you can do things, but you're not that innocent,'' Bernie said.

 

"You never, ever become that carefree kid."

 

The sisters were abused by notorious paedophile priest Bryan Coffey — who is now dead — and the pair are pursuing the Catholic Church for compensation.

 

But the sisters' legal pursuit is in jeopardy after the High Court made it harder to find the church vicariously liable.

 

Coffey was never convicted of the women's abuse, but Trish received a letter of apology from the Ballarat bishop's office in 2015.

 

Another victim, known as "DP", was also abused by Coffey when he was a five year old in Port Fairy in south-west Victoria.

 

In 2021, he was awarded $200,000 by two Victorian courts, which found the church was vicariously liable for the harm caused by Coffey.

 

But the church appealed that ruling to the High Court and won, because Coffey was not an employee — instead, he had a relationship of a spiritual nature with the church.

 

"This is people pushing words around on a piece of paper as if we don't even exist anymore. And we've felt insignificant for most of our lives," Bernie said.

 

"It's really, really shit to do it when they have knowledge that he did this to us."

 

The landmark decision late last year has placed pressure on state governments to retrospectively change the law.

 

"We just need someone to listen to say that this is not right. We need to make these changes to help everyone. It's unfair that every time they find an avenue, a new lawyer finds a new way of doing things [to defend the church],'' Trish said.

 

High Court decision has 'dire' consequences, advocate says

 

On Wednesday, Victoria's upper house will debate a private member's bill to hold institutions to account by making it easier to find them vicariously liable.

 

The idea that Coffey was not an employee is fanciful, the sisters said.

 

Their lawyer and longtime victim-survivor advocate Judy Courtin said Victoria used to be a leader in tackling institutional abuse, but was falling behind.

 

"Once again, and despite all the work done by the royal commission, parliament and others to ensure victims of institutional child abuse might receive justice, the church has secured dispensation from responsibility, this time via a technical argument before the High Court,'' Dr Courtin said in a letter to the state's Attorney-General.

 

"The consequences of this decision are dire."

 

Ms Courtin said some of her clients pursuing similar action were suicidal as a result of the High Court ruling.

 

Law reform has the backing of various victim-survivor groups and the Australian Lawyers Alliance.

 

The issue has been taken to the Standing Council of Attorneys-General, where it has been discussed, but no plan of action has been developed.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 17, 2025, 7:47 a.m. No.23045996   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23045988

 

2/2

 

Victorian government rejects upper house bill

 

Victoria is under pressure, including from government MPs, to act first.

 

The Legalise Cannabis Party bill to retrospectively change the law is the first step, and the party has tabled a similar bill in the NSW.

 

"This is about victims and survivors having opportunity to tell their story, to have their day in court and an opportunity to heal,'' Victorian Legalise Cannabis MP Rachel Payne said.

 

Her NSW colleague Jeremy Buckingham said the High Court decision invited the states to legislate.

 

"It is deeply immoral and unreasonable that subsequent to the High Court's decision the perpetrators and the institutions in which they served cannot be held liable for these abhorrent crimes. The current situation cannot stand, and we will continue to fight until the law is changed,'' he said.

 

Victorian Attorney-General Sonya Kilkenny has met with victim groups and is considering options for reform. The state's preference is for a national approach.

 

"We have always sent a clear message to child abuse survivors — we stand with you in your fight for justice and always will,'' Ms Kilkenny said.

 

The Victorian government will not support the Legalise Cannabis Party bill as it believes it is too broad.

 

"We would need to do more work to understand the legal risks and potential unintended impacts on community, volunteer and not-for-profit organisations,'' Ms Kilkenny said.

 

NSW Attorney-General Michael Daley said he understood "the High Court's finding relating to vicarious liability for institutional child sexual abuse is upsetting and traumatising for victim-survivors".

 

"NSW in 2018 changed the law to extend vicarious liability to individuals who are akin to employees, such as priests and volunteers, but that amendment was not retrospective," he said.

 

"The Standing Council of Attorneys-General has agreed to consider the impacts of the High Court decision and potential options for reform."

 

Bishop says Victorian court decision was 'unjust'

 

Ballarat Bishop Paul Bird said the church believed the Victorian court's decision to impose vicarious liability on the diocesan community was "excessively broad" and "unjust".

 

He said that prompted the decision to take the issue to the High Court.

 

"The Victorian court's decision seemed to me so vague as to mean that a diocesan community could be held vicariously liable for any actions that a priest did anywhere, anytime. I consider that it would be unfair to impose such a wide liability on a diocesan community,'' he said.

 

Bishop Bird also said there would be "additional unfairness" if the state introduced a retrospective fix.

 

He said the diocese would continue to provide compensation in cases where there was evidence it had been negligent in safeguarding.

 

Trish believed the church was deliberately trying to stall the legal process, hoping that people like her and her sister would die.

 

"A lot of their victims are getting older and sicker, or a lot are dying and a lot have [died by] suicide. I think they think we will eventually die out and it'll all be cleaned up," she said.

 

Thinking about the past too painful for survivors

 

When the girls were growing up in Ouyen, in the Mallee in Victoria's north-west, in the 1970s, they did not realise they were both being abused.

 

Thinking about life before the abuse is too painful.

 

"You don't want to think about that time," Bernie said.

 

"So, you lose all the happy memories pre the time, because you just don't want to think backwards.

 

"So, all the fun stuff … I won't even go there."

 

"It seems disrespectful to our families, but it's just hard,'' Trish said.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-14/victoria-sisters-catholic-church-abuse-bryan-coffey/105286662

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=Bryan+Coffey

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 18, 2025, 1:52 a.m. No.23049366   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3683 >>2189

>>23045726

Albanese to meet Zelenskyy amid moves to secure release of Jenkins

 

Stephen Dziedzic - 18 May 2025

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Rome in the wake of the Inauguration Mass for Pope Leo XIV, as the government intensifies its efforts to free Australian man Oscar Jenkins from a Russian jail.

 

Jenkins was captured in December last year after fighting for Ukraine, and earlier this week he was sentenced to 13 years in a Russian "penal colony" for fighting as a mercenary in the conflict.

 

Mr Albanese slammed that decision as an "outrage" and called the legal process in Russia "very politicised" and invalid.

 

He also said Russia was abrogating its responsibilities under international law because it had declared Jenkins a mercenary rather than an enemy combatant, which would impose additional obligations on Moscow.

 

"It is a continuation of the way that they have behaved, abrogating their international responsibilities," he said.

 

"This conflict began with them choosing to invade a sovereign nation and to abrogate their responsibility to uphold international law."

 

The prime minister is expected to discuss Jenkins with the Ukraine president when they sit down on the sidelines of the massive gathering in Rome.

 

Prisoner swap talks

 

Some analysts have speculated Australia might try to secure his freedom as part of a broader prisoner swap deal between Russia and Ukraine.

 

Both countries made an in-principle agreement to swap 1,000 prisoners during a meeting held in Türkiye this week, although the two countries remain far apart on the fundamental issues that would underpin a deal.

 

Any prisoner swap involving Jenkins might also be complicated by Russia's decision to declare him a mercenary rather than a prisoner of war.

 

Mr Albanese told journalists on Saturday that the meeting with Mr Zelenskyy was not yet locked in because both countries were still trying to lock in the final details around timing.

 

The two men are among multiple world leaders at the Papal Inauguration who are trying to juggle meetings on the sidelines of the historic event.

 

Australia has backed the peace negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, but Mr Albanese has said repeatedly that any peace pact must respect Kyiv's interests.

 

Mr Jenkins was captured late last year while serving under Ukraine's military in the Donbas region, and was filmed being slapped in a video shared online.

 

The government has repeatedly called for him to be freed by Russia.

 

Earlier this week, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said she was "appalled" by the "sham trial" and sentence handed to Jenkins.

 

"We continue to hold serious concerns for Mr Jenkins," she said.

 

"We are working with Ukraine and other partners, including the International Committee of the Red Cross, to advocate for his welfare and release."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-18/albanese-and-zelenskyy-meet-in-rome-oscar-jenkins-sentence/105306076

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ieCzcUx3Bjw

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 2:31 a.m. No.23053614   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3617 >>2140

>>22986131

>>23027918

Sussan Ley: ‘We lost the flag, but we’re ready for a new season’

 

Sussan Ley - 18 May 2025

 

1/2

 

If you are one of the millions of dedicated footy fans, if you have barracked for one of our incredible Olympians or if you have been in a stadium cheering on the mighty Tillies, you will know you can’t always be on the winning side.

 

As a Sydney Swans supporter I know after the loss of a grand final, when you get towelled up you don’t give up.

 

You don’t drop your team or your belief in it either. You get a bag of ice, you watch the tapes and you get to work rebuilding. You do the work to come back stronger and faster next season.

 

As someone who has served as an MP for the Liberal Party for almost 25 years, I have experienced both success and defeat. Just days ago we were handed a big loss that we must accept with humility.

 

Despite the result, the Liberal Party remains the most successful political party in Australian history. We have won more flags than any other team.

 

Our party has, more than any other, helped shape Australia into the prosperous, strong and fair society it is today.

 

But we have to face up to the fact that despite our best efforts, we have failed to connect with a changing electorate.

 

We have lost the trust of women and we have not convinced younger Australians that we have a plan to provide a fair go for their generation. We need to focus on renewing the compact we have had with Australians who live in cities, helping them deal with a rapidly changing economy and rising prices.

 

We have work to do. The reality is in recent elections we have failed to meet the expectations of the Australian community. We have to show the nurses, small business owners, tradies, teachers, farmers, parents and retirees, who ask for little but contribute a lot, that we understand their aspirations.

 

Australians sent a clear message at the election. We must listen, change and develop a fresh approach. To take a term from footy, we need to look at our system.

 

We need to understand what sort of team we are, and we need to come up with a new agenda to take to the Australian people.

 

Now more than ever, the federal Liberal Party must respect, reflect and represent modern Australia.

 

There is enormous talent in my partyroom. One of our biggest strengths is the different backgrounds my team members have and the different life experiences that have shaped them.

 

A diversity of opinions is not, as many commentators would have you think, a sign of weakness. My team cares about the future of our party because it knows we have the right values to keep Australians strong and secure.

 

As leader, I have committed to a full assessment of why we lost the election.

 

Properly understanding the causes of our defeat helps us determine the direction in which we must head.

 

I am optimistic we can rebuild and regain the trust of Australians because our party has been here before.

 

Following the loss of the Fraser government we commissioned the Valder Report. “Facing the Facts” was a comprehensive review that drew on views across our great party and the community. It set us on a course through a difficult period for our party.

 

We need to ensure our response to this recent defeat is equally comprehensive and consultative. But as we work out why we failed to win the flag at this election, and decide the path forward, there are things I can make clear are not going to change.

 

Our policies are up for review. But our values are not.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 2:32 a.m. No.23053617   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23053614

 

2/2

 

The Liberal Party I lead will not be altering our enduring commitment to what is best for Australia’s national interest. We will always stand for lower, simpler and fairer taxes – not as an economic ideology, but because we trust people to spend their own money more than we do the government.

 

We will always take education seriously, not for slogans or funding battles, but because knowledge and critical thinking are so important – especially for our children.

 

We will always support families, not just with payments, but with policies that respect their choices – in childcare, housing, education, and retirement.

 

And we continue our steadfast support of our alliances and security agreements such as ANZUS and AUKUS, because we must have an urgent, honest conversation with Australians about the deteriorating geopolitical environment in our region.

 

The next steps for our party are focused on listening to the community and rebuilding our movement.

 

But we will never shy away from our timeless values, which will always underpin our policy development processes.

 

We are ready to do the work; we are up for it; we will take a good hard look at ourselves. Preseason is about to begin and I know my team is hungry to get to work.

 

Sussan Ley is the Leader of the Opposition.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/sussan-ley-we-lost-the-flag-but-were-ready-for-a-new-season/news-story/7c0f3ba66852ee880d10bcada24a9fbc

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 2:42 a.m. No.23053629   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3634 >>3666 >>3676 >>2189

>>23012385

>>23012408

>>23045675

Pope Leo vows not to be an autocrat, receives the ring of office

 

David Crowe - May 18, 2025

 

1/2

 

Vatican City: The faithful came in their thousands to see Pope Leo XIV begin his work as one of the world’s most powerful spiritual leaders, in a ceremony that combined ancient symbols and modern statecraft.

 

Waiting since dawn, patiently and sometimes joyfully, onlookers crowded into the square where Robert Prevost, son of a school superintendent and a librarian, was elevated to the papacy to lead 1.4 billion Catholics worldwide.

 

Deepest of all the symbolism was Pope Leo’s visit to a tomb before the inauguration Mass to venerate the bones of St Peter – the bishop of Rome almost two millennia ago.

 

The crowds began taking their seats in the square soon after dawn, on a warm morning in Rome under blue skies.

 

Joining the faithful were national leaders, who networked before the Mass in their places at the front of the inauguration, proving the diplomatic reach of the Vatican.

 

US Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio sat in the same area as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, European Union President Ursula von der Leyen and Prince Edward, representing King Charles.

 

Zelensky and Vance shook hands – more than two months after the US vice president berated the Ukrainian president in the White House.

 

Behind the scenes at the Mass, Rubio has spoken of the Vatican as a possible third party to host peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, highlighting the potential for the new Pope to become a trusted broker between states.

 

The informal talks before the Mass gave Prime Minister Anthony Albanese time to speak with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and others.

 

He met the Pope soon after the Mass, shaking hands briefly along with other leaders within the Vatican.

 

Albanese was due to meet Zelensky and von der Leyen in separate talks after the Mass, as the ceremony gives way to an informal leadership gathering in Rome.

 

The Vatican said the Pope would meet with Zelensky the same afternoon.

 

The pontiff took his first Popemobile ride through St Peter’s Square ahead of the Mass, waving from the back of the all-electric, open-back Mercedes truck to the crowd that waved flags and cheered “Viva il Papa!”

 

The bells of St Peter’s Basilica tolled as Pope Leo waved from the back of the truck, which looped slowly through the square. The crowd cheered, with some waving Peruvian, American and Holy See flags – in recognition that the Pope, born in Chicago, had served as a bishop in Peru for more than two decades.

 

While the funeral Mass for Pope Francis was a sombre ceremony on April 26, the inauguration of Leo began as a celebration for a new and – by all signs – popular Pope. Worshippers from around the world sang, waved national flags and mingled while they waited for the service to begin.

 

The Mass filled St Peter’s Square, which has a capacity of about 80,000 people, and the crowd spilt into the streets beyond. The Vatican estimated 150,000 gathered for the Mass.

 

In a homily broadcast around the world, Pope Leo criticised the global economic system and said it “exploits the Earth’s resources and marginalises the poorest”.

 

He emphasised love as the mission of the church, contrasting this with trying to capture others by force, religious propaganda or power.

 

He said he would govern “without ever yielding to the temptation to be an autocrat” and acknowledged the decision by the College of Cardinals to choose him to lead the church.

 

“I was chosen, without any merit of my own, and now, with fear and trembling, I come to you as a brother,” he said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 2:45 a.m. No.23053634   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23053629

 

2/2

 

Pope Leo, born in Chicago in 1955, became the first North American to be made pontiff when the College of Cardinals elected him on May 8 to succeed Pope Francis, the first South American pontiff.

 

Melbourne Archbishop Peter Comensoli, in Rome for the inaugural Mass, said the reaction to Leo suggested his first message had resonated with people around the world, including Australians.

 

“People of all kinds see Pope Leo as a leader of the world – not just for Catholics,” he told this masthead.

 

One example, he said, was the way Pope Leo spoke of new issues for humanity such as artificial intelligence, confronting ethical questions over the new technology.

 

Sydney Archbishop Anthony Fisher, also in Rome, described the Pope as someone who wanted to ease differences between people.

 

“I think he’s a very centred and centrist pope, and I think there’s been lots of signs of that already,” he said.

 

“He’s centred on Christ. That’s his big message, again and again, about what Christ brings. I think he’s not going to be one to provoke storms. He’ll be much more one to pour oil on troubled waters.

 

“In a very divided world, in a polarised culture and politics, he’s going to be one for bringing people together. I think you see that in his messages so far, and I think that is very much his personality, too.”

 

Pope Leo prepared for the Mass by receiving a vestment known as a pallium to signify his elevation to the papacy. Shaped in a white band and woven from wool, the pallium is seen as a symbol of the lamb Jesus carried on his shoulders, and the role of the pope as shepherd of the faithful.

 

The previous pontiff, Pope Francis, described the pallium as a symbol of those the shepherd looked after.

 

In one of the most important moments during the Mass, Leo received the Fisherman’s ring, signifying the role of St Peter and all later popes as the “fishers of men” in church tradition.

 

While Pope Francis departed from custom by choosing a silver ring, the Vatican distributed images of the ring for Pope Leo showing St Peter on a gold background.

 

Unseen by those in the square, Pope Leo prepared for the Mass by descending to the foundations of St Peter’s Basilica to venerate the bones of St Peter, who was put to death by the Romans in AD 68 because of his faith.

 

Archaeological work at St Peter’s Basilica uncovered more of the necropolis beneath the building in the 1950s and 1960s, leading to the discovery of the bones of a man aged in his 60s. Pope Paul VI said in 1968 that these were the remains of St Peter.

 

There is no coronation for the pope, but there has traditionally been a recognition that he is a head of state, given Vatican City is the world’s smallest country.

 

The last pontiff to be crowned as a king was Pope Paul VI in 1963, who wore the “triple tiara” to represent the three roles of the pontiff as father of kings, governor of the world and vicar of Christ.

 

Pope Paul was given the tiara, which featured pierced silver and three gold bands set with precious gems, by the people of Milan. But he set it aside as a symbolic gift to the poor one year after his papacy began. No pope has been crowned since.

 

The Mass ended with sustained applause across St Peter’s Square as Leo XIV returned to the Vatican, confirmed in office with the Fisherman’s ring. His next duty was to speak with leaders from an estimated 150 countries, ranging from presidents to princes. One by one, he shook their hands.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/world/europe/thousands-gather-under-blue-skies-for-pope-leo-s-inauguration-20250517-p5m035.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 2:51 a.m. No.23053647   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3651 >>8414 >>2190

>>23012385

>>23012408

>>23045675

Another Catholic in the crowd: Anthony Albanese joins thousands at Pope Leo XIV’s inauguration

 

LYDIA LYNCH - 19 May 2025

 

1/2

 

In a sea of world leaders and ­ecstatic Catholics waiting for the era of Leo XIV to officially begin, Anthony Albanese stood out as much as any cardinal or nun in his Akubra.

 

A Prime Minister at the height of his powers was among hundreds of dignitaries in Rome on Sunday, as he waited for the new Pope’s inauguration mass alongside the likes of JD Vance, Giorgia Meloni, new German chancellor Friedrich Merz and Prince Edward standing in for the King.

 

Mr Albanese started his time in the Holy See with Australian bishops admiring the masterpieces and the godliness of a church that has stood for thousands of years.

 

And he was due to end the day firmly in the present with meetings with Europe’s top official, ­Ursula von der Leyen, and Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky scheduled.

 

But for a few moments, Mr Albanese was just another Catholic in the crowd watching the first American pope take his place in a 2000-year-old story.

 

“When Pope Leo gave his address after his election, he spoke about peace and justice in the world,” Mr Albanese said ahead of the mass. “And following on from what I think was an extraordinary role that Pope Francis played in sending out that message of justice and looking after the vulnerable and the poor … is important in today’s world, where we have so much turbulence and people are looking for some constancy, and they’re looking for higher values and a belief, that is important.”

 

Wearing a plain white cassock and a beaming smile, Pope Leo glided through St Peter’s Square in an electric, open-topped popemobile before he was inaugurated as leader of the globe’s 1.4 billion Catholics.

 

Ahead of a ceremony soaked in ancient pomp and ritual, the 69-year-old thrilled crowds of faithful with his debut tour of the square with waves, stopping his procession to bless a baby.

 

Hundreds of thousands of gleeful pilgrims thronged the ­Vatican’s cobbled surrounds on Sunday to witness a new chapter in the history of the world’s oldest and largest church begin.

 

Thousands of police officers – including sharpshooters on the rooftops and bomb disposal squads on the ground – guarded a ceremony that was full of the world’s leaders.

 

Leo, born in Chicago in 1955 and elected the 267th pontiff in a secret conclave last week, has been a lifelong servant of the poor.

 

Like his predecessor, Pope Francis, he opted for simple attire for his lap of St Peter’s Square ­before changing into golden vestments for his inaugural public mass.

 

Crowds had begun gathering since dawn to secure prime position in the sun-soaked piazza, hoping to get close to the new Pope, who holds citizenship from both the United States and Peru.

 

The day contained special meaning for American Josefina Atamiranda who is studying theology at the Angelicum in Rome – the same university where Pope Leo received his doctorate in canon law.

 

“It is a blessing to be able to be here for this historic moment. It is a once-in-a-lifetime moment,” she told The Australian from the centre of St Peter’s Square.

 

“There are hundreds of thousands of people here but somehow it feels like home.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 2:53 a.m. No.23053651   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23053647

 

2/2

 

After making his way inside the basilica, Leo knelt at the tomb of St Peter, considered the first pope, and was then bestowed the symbols of the papacy: the lamb's wool stole, known as a pallium, and the fisherman’s ring, which will be smashed when he dies.

 

The pallium, which was woven by Benedictine nuns, signifies his role as shepherd and is a fitting symbol for a pope who faces the challenge of uniting a divided ­global flock.

 

The son of a teacher and a ­librarian, Leo takes over the ­leadership of a church still dealing with the fallout of the widespread child sex abuse scandal, and grappling with modern world issues.

 

In meetings throughout the week he had repeated his call for peace and emphasised the importance of a family built around a “stable union of a man and a woman”, and defended the rights of the unborn.

 

The jubilation, thick in the air on Sunday, was a very different mood to the solemnity that cloaked the city just weeks ago when hundreds of thousands gathered in the very same streets to farewell Pope Francis.

 

The contrast was not lost on Perth’s Archbishop Tim Costelloe, who attended Francis’s ­funeral on April 26 and returned to Rome to witness Leo’s formal accession to head of the Catholic Church.

 

“When you reflect on the death of Pope Francis and the enormous number of people who came for his funeral to express their gratitude, and now the excitement about the election of Pope Leo, it is an indication of the papacy to speak into what is often a very troubled situation around the world,” Mr Cottesloe said.

 

“I think that helps to explain that not just Catholics, or even just Christians, but people generally are interested and excited and filled with a sense of hope.”

 

The Australian ambassador-designate to the Holy See, Keith Pitt, a former Nationals MP and cabinet minister, took up his ­Vatican posting just weeks before Francis’s death.

 

“Following a period of great sadness with the passing of Pope Francis, this is now a time of renewal, great joy and celebration. There is a lot of excitement,” Mr Pitt told The Australian. “I got reminded again today that Pope Leo does love Tim Tams, so having a Pope who knows and admires Australia and its people, as I’m sure others have before him, but just the fact that he has visited, I think that will make a real difference.”

 

Mr Pitt is expected to have a private meeting with Leo in coming weeks, where he will present his diplomatic credentials to the Vatican along with a ceremonial gift for the pontiff.

 

“I wouldn’t want to pre-empt what I may or may not take, but you can be assured it’ll have an Australian flavour,” he said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/another-catholic-in-the-crowd-anthony-albanese-joins-thousands-at-pope-leo-xivs-inauguration/news-story/907feb8623d2658e7b1a7255062813ed

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 3 a.m. No.23053666   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3669 >>3676 >>2190

>>23053629

Europe seeks defence pact with Australia as tanks head to Ukraine

 

David Crowe - May 19, 2025

 

1/2

 

Rome: The European Union is seeking a defence pact with Australia to deepen military co-operation in a move that highlights fears of a sharp increase in global instability.

 

The EU put the proposal to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Rome on Sunday in the hope of matching other defence partnerships that have cleared the way for closer intelligence work and joint exercises.

 

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen revealed the idea in talks with Albanese after the inaugural Mass for Pope Leo XIV at the Vatican, saying it could add to European military ties with South Korea and Japan.

 

The move came as Albanese met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and pledged continued Australian support against Russia, including the delivery of Abrams tanks promised last October.

 

Amid concerns the tanks were taking too long to arrive, the Ukrainian president’s office said Albanese had assured them the tanks were “already on their way” to help the war effort.

 

The sharper focus on military ties with Europe is part of a wider debate about global security after US President Donald Trump took office in January and began threatening allies such as Canada.

 

Von der Leyen did not name Trump in her public remarks with Albanese, but she declared that the security outlook had grown worse since she spoke to the prime minister at a summit in Brazil in November.

 

“The geopolitical tensions have massively increased,” she said before the private talks began.

 

“The good thing is, Australia and Europe are reliable partners. We’re predictable. We share the same values.

 

“And this is the reason also that we do not only see you as a trading partner, but we see you as a strategic partner, and we would very much like to broaden this strategic partnership.

 

“For example, we have signed security and defence agreements with South Korea and with Japan, soon with the UK. We would be very pleased if we could develop such a security and defence partnership too, just to broaden the strategic partnership.”

 

The EU signed a defence partnership with South Korea in November to set up joint talks on security and intelligence, clear the way for military exercises, respect sea borders and work together on cybersecurity.

 

While the agreement did not name any adversaries, it focused on risks that have been aired in the past in relation to Russia and China, such as cybersecurity.

 

Albanese expressed caution about the EU suggestion when speaking to reporters after his meeting with von der Leyen, but he was open about the prospect of closer defence ties.

 

“We said that we were certainly interested in any further engagement of support, but it’s very early stages at this point,” he said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 3:01 a.m. No.23053669   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23053666

 

2/2

 

Albanese said the further talks would take place at NATO or with the EU. Australia works with NATO, for instance in sending military aid to Ukraine, as one of the “Indo Pacific Four” along with Japan, South Korea and New Zealand.

 

“I wouldn’t over-read what Ursula von der Leyen statements were,” he said. “It was a suggestion by the president that the relationship was based upon not just economic relations, but based upon our values.

 

“And it’s no accident that Europe has defended the Ukrainian people, and so has Australia. We will stand up for the international rule of law.”

 

Zelensky told Albanese that Ukraine wanted tougher sanctions on Russia, but he also thanked Australia for the sanctions it had already imposed along with the delivery of military support and humanitarian aid worth $1.5 billion.

 

“Together, we can really move this situation closer to peace, with pressure on Russia,” Zelensky said.

 

“And we are very thankful for sanctions. I want to raise with you also this topic, which is very important: put more pressure, more sanctions on Russia.”

 

Albanese told reporters afterwards that Australia had already imposed 1400 sanctions against Russian individuals and companies, but he left open the idea of doing more.

 

“We continue to look at whatever we can do to place pressure on Russia,” he said.

 

“It’s important, as well, that we continue to send the message to the globe that we stand with Ukraine.”

 

Albanese confirmed in public on Sunday that he was prepared to consider any proposal for a “coalition of the willing” to send a peacekeeping force to Ukraine if peace could be achieved.

 

The “coalition of the willing” was suggested by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and French President Emmanuel Macron to patrol Ukraine if a peace deal was signed.

 

While Albanese said earlier this year that he was willing to consider Australian help for the peacekeeping force, this provoked a dispute with Peter Dutton when he was Liberal leader and opposition leader. Dutton rejected the idea of sending Australian troops, even as part of a peacekeeping force.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/europe-seeks-defence-pact-with-australia-as-tanks-head-to-ukraine-20250519-p5m090.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ckg8E64tFt8

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 3:07 a.m. No.23053676   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2190

>>23053629

>>23053666

Europe eyes defence pact with Australia

 

LYDIA LYNCH - 19 May 2025

 

The European Union is seeking to clinch a new defence pact with Australia to “broaden” strategic ties amid growing geopolitical upheaval, with Anthony Albanese advising talks were in “very early stages”.

 

The Prime Minister held separate talks with EU president Ursula von der Leyen and Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of Pope Leo XIV’s inauguration mass on Sunday, assuring Mr Zelensky Australian tanks were on their way, as Russia’s brutal and ongoing invasion dominated discussions.

 

Hailing a “new era” for Australia and Europe, Ms von der Leyen revealed the EU was eager increase military cooperation with the Albanese government through a new defence agreement, similar to those the bloc has inked with South Korea and Japan, which boosted co-operation on maritime and cyber security.

 

As she cited increased global tensions, Ms von der Leyen said Australia and Europe were reliable, predictable partners who could “offer to each other stability”.

 

“And this is the reason also that we do not only see you as a trading partner, but we see you as a strategic partner, and we would very much like to broaden this strategic partnership,” she told Mr Albanese.

 

“For example, we have signed security and defence agreements with South Korea and with Japan, soon with the UK. We would be very pleased if we could develop such a security and defence partnership too, just to broaden the strategic partnership in many topics that we have in common.”

 

Speaking to journalists after the talks, Mr Albanese signalled Australia was open to “further engagement”, but noted it already had a “range of defence relationships” with European countries and was a partner of NATO’s so-called Indo-Pacific Four, along with Japan, the Republic of Korea and New Zealand.

 

Asked if Ms von der Leyen was seeking to tighten Australia’s defence efforts with NATO, Mr Albanese said: “This was just a suggestion that Ursula von der Leyen raised”.

 

“There was no detail further, just it was really an assertion of Europe’s values being consistent with Australia’s values and in what ways could be explored further defence co-operation,” he added.

 

The pair also revived preliminary talks on a free-trade agreement after negotiations stalled in 2023, though Mr Albanese was unable say whether an agreement would be struck during this term of government.

 

“Our objective is to support an expansion of free and fair trade … and we will wait and see,” he said.

 

“We have indicated in the past, though, that we won’t sign up to agreements that aren’t in Australia’s national interest.”

 

‘Thank you for news of the tanks’

 

At his meeting with the Ukrainian president, Mr Albanese pledged Australia’s continuing support for Kyiv’s fight against Russia and told Mr Zelensky that the promised M1A1 Abrams tanks were “on their way at the moment”.

 

In April it was revealed that forty-nine Australian Army tanks promised to Ukraine six months ago were yet to leave the country.

 

Mr Albanese also raised the fate of Melbourne man Oscar Jenkins, who was on Friday sentenced to 13 years in a Russian colony after being captured fighting for Ukraine.

 

But he would not be drawn on whether he had asked Mr Zelensky to push for Mr Jenkins’s release in any future prisoner swap.

 

“What we did was … in a diplomatic way, seek Ukraine’s further support for Oscar Jenkins,” he said.

 

Mr Zelensky, who also met with US Vice President JD Vance in Rome and was expected to speak with Donald Trump by phone on Monday, thanked Mr Albanese for “the news of the tanks” and called for more economic sanctions against Russia.

 

“Together we can really move this situation closer to peace with pressure on Russia and we are very thankful for sanctions,” he said.

 

“I want to raise with you also this topic, which is very important, put more pressure, more sanctions on Russia.”

 

Australia has already imposed 1400 sanctions against Russian companies and individuals, Mr Albanese said later, adding Australia would “continue to look at whatever we can do to place pressure on Russia”.

 

Mr Albanese did not meet with Mr Vance who also attended Sunday’s mass.

 

“He arrived quite late in terms of just prior to the mass taking place, as you will have seen,” he said adding that no formal meeting had been sought either.

 

“I’m the Prime Minister, I meet the President of the United States, and that will occur at an appropriate time.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/europe-eyes-defence-pact-with-australia/news-story/1e9b5bf51f012bc5dfee7ca4e6c70c0d

 

https://x.com/AlboMP/status/1924118168861286703

 

https://x.com/ZelenskyyUa/status/1924133485754613832

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 3:16 a.m. No.23053683   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3694 >>2192

>>23045726

>>23049366

‘It’s just cold. I don’t like the cold’: The haunting plight of Oscar Jenkins

 

Rob Harris - May 19, 2025

 

1/2

 

London: In a dimly lit video posted quietly to YouTube, Oscar Jenkins sits slouched and unshaven, his bruised face drawn with fatigue.

 

His speech is slow and fragmented, as if he is assembling thoughts under the weight of something unspoken. The unverified video, posted in March, is the first of Jenkins speaking at length seen outside the war zone since his capture by Russian forces in Ukraine.

 

What emerges is not the voice of a hardened mercenary, as Russian prosecutors would later allege, but that of a conflicted man swept up in a war he barely understands.

 

“Personally, I don’t want to be in Ukraine … I don’t know Ukrainian culture,” the 33-year-old former Melbourne Grammar School student tells a person off-camera, who appears to be one of his captors.

 

“I don’t know Ukrainian people very well. It’s just cold. I don’t like the cold … However, if there is a just war, maybe it is this Ukraine war, on the Ukraine side.”

 

Jenkins’ murky rationale is hardly the call to arms of a political zealot. “I’m not very political,” he says, admitting much of his knowledge of the conflict was gleaned from Wikipedia.

 

This masthead has not been able to verify when, where or the circumstances in which the heavily edited, 11-minute video was made.

 

Jenkins’ reflections veer between history, geopolitics and personal discomfort. He references the shared culture of Russia and Ukraine, and makes vague assertions about land and liberty. “I think they want resources and land,” Jenkins says. “I think Putin maybe, I don’t know him, is interested in also having more land for Russia, maybe the USSR he has dreams of.”

 

Then comes a moment of unexpected clarity: “I don’t want a world where people kill each other. I would rather have a world where there’s all peace, security, freedom. The best, the best world.”

 

Captured in the eastern town of Makiivka in December, Jenkins was at first paraded on social media and then, just as quickly, disappeared. False rumours of his death circulated until, in February, he again appeared on pro-Russian Telegram accounts with a broken arm in a proof-of-life video.

 

He was formally charged with fighting as a mercenary in April and put on trial by a Russian-backed court in the occupied Luhansk region. On Friday, he was sentenced to 13 years in a maximum-security penal colony.

 

During the hearing, he stood behind glass in jeans and a striped jumper, his voice flat and apologetic.

 

“I feel sorry that I participated in a potentially violent way,” he said, his comments sounding rehearsed. “I am not a Ukrainian nationalist, my ideas are more global. I hope everyone in the world can have peace without war.”

 

British fighter Shaun Pinner, who spent months in Russian captivity, warned that such performances were choreographed. “They break you first,” he told this masthead last month. “And then they parade you.”

 

Pinner, who fought with Ukraine’s marines and, in 2022, was sentenced to death by a separatist court in Donetsk before being returned to the United Kingdom in a prisoner swap, has since spoken publicly about the conditions inside Russian captivity – physical abuse, mock executions, starvation. His testimony casts a long shadow over Jenkins’ case, fuelling concerns that the Australian could face a similar fate, or worse.

 

In Canberra, Foreign Minister Penny Wong called Jenkins’ trial “a sham” and said the Australian, having served in Ukraine’s regular armed forces, must be afforded prisoner-of-war protections under the Geneva Conventions.

 

“Russia is obligated to treat him in accordance with international humanitarian law, including humane treatment,” she said.

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese echoed those concerns, calling the sentence “an outrage” and “a continuation of the way they have behaved, abrogating their responsibilities”.

 

But Russia does not recognise foreign fighters in Ukraine as lawful combatants. Instead, it categorises them as criminals or paid mercenaries – a stance that strips them of POW protections and makes them pawns in a wider geopolitical game. Moscow claimed Jenkins was paid up to 800,000 roubles ($15,000) a month and arrived via a recruiting centre in Ternopil, in western Ukraine. From there, he was sent east, where he served with the 66th Separate Mechanised Brigade in the Donbas.

 

Jenkins’ account offers a bleaker, less heroic picture of service in the name of justice.

 

“Most of my work has been digging defensive position [sic]. Digging position,” he says in the video. “If the Russians come, you push back, you shoot for the drones. But I haven’t really done much of that.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 19, 2025, 3:19 a.m. No.23053694   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23053683

 

2/2

 

He recounts firing a machine gun once into a Russian position, but it’s unclear if he ever saw combat. “I don’t know what a win is. Is it to freeze the line and then let Donetsk, Luhansk, Crimea choose again?”

 

He describes a battlefield stripped of meaning – bleak, grim, senseless. “I saw lots of bodies, dead bodies. Infrastructure had been destroyed, the environment, ecology had been destroyed. Mud, just a lot of mud. Not many trees. It’s not beautiful, it’s not nice.”

 

Jenkins also gives a candid account of dysfunction among the volunteer ranks. “There were other drugs with some of the foreigners. I tried in Ternopil, I tried marijuana, I had a puff,” he says. “But on the base near Slovyansk, there were people who were smoking marijuana, cannabis and drinking on base, and it was causing issues.”

 

What began as a personal mission – perhaps for justice, perhaps for meaning – seems to have curdled into a slow descent into disillusionment.

 

Jenkins, a talented cricketer and footballer, was known for his skills and dedication. After graduating in 2010 and studying biomedical sciences at Monash University, he moved to China in 2015, where he worked as a lecturer at Tianjin Modern Vocational Technology College from 2017. Jenkins was a passionate vegan and runner, often sharing his beliefs through social media, including a rather odd video stating he would “force Chinese people to be vegan”.

 

A schoolfriend recently described Jenkins as “quirky, but a really great guy”. But after school, he said, he’d lost contact with many of his friends. As a cricket teammate, he was “a bit smarter than average, more deep-thinking”.

 

But here Jenkins doesn’t speak in absolutes. He second-guesses himself constantly. What is clear, though, even in his hesitant answers, is that by the time he was captured, he wanted out.

 

Russia’s refusal to grant him POW status severely limits the options available to the Australian government. Quiet diplomatic overtures are being made, mainly through the International Committee of the Red Cross, and officials are believed to be exploring the possibility of a prisoner exchange.

 

Russian human rights groups have speculated that Jenkins may be part of a future swap involving Kira and Igor Korolev – Russian nationals arrested in Brisbane last year and charged with preparing to carry out an act of espionage.

 

For now, Jenkins remains a prisoner – not just of the Kremlin, but of the uncertainty that has defined his story from the beginning.

 

Don Rothwell, a professor of international law at the Australian National University, points out that, unlike other high-profile Australian detainees in recent years – Kylie Moore-Gilbert in Iran, Cheng Lei in China, Sean Turnell in Myanmar – Jenkins is no academic, no journalist, no dissident. He is a man who inserted himself into a war, and because of Russia’s stance, may have forfeited the usual lines of diplomatic protection.

 

That doesn’t mean his life is worthless to the Kremlin. But it does mean that the path to bringing him home is narrower, more fraught, and more susceptible to politics. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has – as is its longstanding habit – urged his family to stay silent, wary of jeopardising sensitive talks.

 

In public, Jenkins is now reduced to a series of clips: a courtroom video, a coerced confession, a shaky YouTube monologue. But it’s in those moments – especially the unguarded ones – that his story comes through.

 

Not as a symbol. Not as a hero. Just a man who went looking for something, and found something else entirely.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/it-s-just-cold-i-don-t-like-the-cold-the-haunting-plight-of-oscar-jenkins-20250518-p5m03c.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mxf__4ZX0TA

 

https://x.com/Darwin_f1978/status/1924177536554307687

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 20, 2025, 2:49 a.m. No.23058406   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8408 >>8411 >>2839 >>7420 >>2269 >>9989 >>0691 >>2192

>>22986131

>>23027918

Nationals call it quits on decades-long coalition with Liberals

 

Maani Truu - 20 May 2025

 

1/2

 

The Nationals will split from the Liberal Party after days of negotiations between the two sides failed to result in a coalition agreement, breaking with a century-long tradition.

 

Nationals leader David Littleproud made the announcement at Parliament House on Tuesday, describing it as one of the "hardest political decisions of his life".

 

He told reporters the Nationals would continue to work constructively with the Liberal Party but they would not re-enter into a formal coalition agreement at this stage.

 

"The National Party will sit alone on a principle basis," Mr Littleproud said.

 

"On the basis of looking forward, not having to look back, and to try and actually regain important policy pieces that change the lives of the people we represent."

 

Emboldened by an election result that saw the minor party retain nearly all of its lower house seats while the Liberal Party went backwards, Nationals MPs had previously flagged that the arrangement was up for discussion.

 

Mr Littleproud travelled to Albury last week to meet with newly elected Liberal leader Sussan Ley, who was at home to be with her dying mother.

 

The sticking points for the minor party were the continuation of a nuclear power policy, the Regional Australia Future Fund, and the desire for divestiture powers for supermarkets.

 

One of the Coalition's key policies going into the election was a plan to build nuclear power reactors on seven sites around the country to supplement the energy transition.

 

But after the devastating May 3 election loss, which saw the Coalition reduced to just over 40 seats in the House of Representatives, Liberals' views on the policy were mixed.

 

Some wanted the nuclear power policy ditched, others wanted it retained but with less taxpayer money involved, and some wanted to double down.

 

Hours after the Nationals announcement, a disappointed Ms Ley said the minor party had sought commitments on specific policies during negotiations.

 

"I proposed that we stand up a joint shadow ministry consisting of Liberal Party shadow ministers and National Party shadow ministers," she said.

 

"And that we then work separately on policies, as we should, in our separate party rooms and come together articulating what those policies are at the right time.

 

"The Nationals did not agree to that approach."

 

The Liberals also argued the Nationals would not explicitly agree to traditional shadow cabinet solidarity, which obliges frontbenchers to back Coalition policies.

 

But Ms Ley said she remained a "committed coalitionist" and that her door was open to restarting negotiations, but added that a fully Liberal frontbench would be unveiled later this week.

 

"The shadow ministers that I appoint from [the Liberal] party room will be well equipped and incredibly capable to take the fight up to Labor right up until the next election," she said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 20, 2025, 2:50 a.m. No.23058408   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23058406

 

2/2

 

National leader hopeful of new agreement in future

 

Mr Littleproud said he was hopeful the two parties would be able to come to a new agreement before the next federal election in three years, but added that the party would contest the election alone if that didn't happen.

 

"I had a respectful conversation with Sussan Ley this morning, sat down, made it very clear that we remain committed to having the door open, respecting the position that Sussan has been put in — that she is a leader that needs to rebuild the Liberal Party," he said.

 

"They are going on a journey of rediscovery and this will provide them the opportunity to do that without the spectre of the National Party imposing their will.

 

"I gave her the commitment that I'll work with her every day to help to try to rebuild the relationship to the point we can re-enter a coalition before the next election."

 

Neither the Liberals or Nationals could realistically form government without the support of the other, according to ABC election analyst Antony Green.

 

It was unclear whether the Liberal candidates would run against Nationals at the next election, former party leader Michael McCormack said on Tuesday, telling reporters "a week is a long time in politics, three years is an eternity".

 

"We may well get back into a coalition arrangement before the next election, I do hope so," he said.

 

By abandoning a coalition, National politicians will also forfeit their titles and access to the opposition cabinet.

 

"A lot of our members of our party room are going to lose positions and titles out of this, and money, and that wasn't even a focus of the discussion for us," deputy Nationals Leader Kevin Hogan said.

 

"We've all broken up in a relationship that's been important to us, and very often, more often than not, you get back together and join back together with clearer clarity and focus on what the relationship was about."

 

Mr Littleproud denied on 7.30 that the National Party would target Liberal seats, including that of Ms Ley.

 

"No, she'll be the next prime minister of this country," Mr Littleproud said.

 

"We're not trying to target one another, particularly when there are sitting members in place.

 

"We respect them and we respect the roles that they play."

 

The coalition agreement has been abandoned multiple times over the previous century, with the parties eventually joining back together. The last split was in 1987 after a fight between the two parties in Queensland.

 

Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the break-up of the Coalition showed the opposition had learnt nothing from the election.

 

"It's hard to see how Australians can take them seriously when they don't even take each other seriously," he said.

 

"They tried to divide the Australian community in the election campaign and they ended up dividing themselves."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-20/nationals-will-not-re-enter-coalition-agreement/105313818

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 20, 2025, 2:54 a.m. No.23058411   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2194

>>22986131

>>23027918

>>23058406

‘Door remains open’ says Sussan Ley amidst shock Coalition split following federal election disaster

 

Liberal sources say the National party gave Ley less than an hour’s notice of their decision.

 

Dominic Giannini - 20 May 2025

 

Nuclear energy has blown up a political agreement between the Nationals and the Liberals after leaders failed to reach common ground but left the door open for a reconciliation.

 

The traditional political marriage couldn’t be consecrated following a disastrous result for the Coalition at the federal election with the Nationals standing firm on wanting to retain four key policies.

 

These included remaining committed to nuclear energy, divestiture powers to break up big supermarkets, a $20 billion investment fund that would disperse $1 billion a year on regional infrastructure and universal phone services.

 

Landlines and payphones must have service no matter where they are in Australia but this doesn’t extend to mobile phones, which the Nationals have been fighting to include.

 

Nationals Leader David Littleproud said the party didn’t want to have to re-prosecute the case to retain the policies it fought for under the previous agreement in opposition.

 

“It’s on a principled position of making sure that those hard-fought wins are maintained and respected and we continue to look forward,” Littleproud told reporters in Canberra on Tuesday.

 

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley addressed the media in the afternoon, emphasising her commitment to the Coalition despite the recent split.

 

“I really believe that the Coalition is stronger together, I am a committed Coalitionist,” she said.

 

“I do pay tribute to my Liberal Party colleagues in this room now and their intention to work constructively for the future with new and different policies, but never stepping away from our timeless values.

 

“Our policies may change, our values never will. But we need to give that process due diligence and I, as leader, want to harness the real initiative, interest, talent and the smarts of so many.”

 

Ley also acknowledged there were significant roadblocks to a unified Coalition.

 

“Shadow cabinet solidarity is very important and unless I, as leader of the Liberals, could be sure about that, it was important that we didn’t take those next steps,” she said.

 

“As I’ve said, I wasn’t assured of that with issues that may divide both members of their party room and members of our party room in the future.”

 

“The Liberal party’s door remains open to the Nationals’ should they wish to rejoin the coalition before the next election.”

 

Liberal sources say the National party gave Ley less than an hour’s notice of their decision.

 

The change in opposition doesn’t have a substantial impact on the government’s ability to pass legislation with Labor commanding a major majority in the lower house and only needing the Greens in the Senate.

 

The Liberals still have the numbers to pass legislation in the Senate with Labor without the Nationals.

 

Without a Coalition agreement, Labor has a significant electoral advantage with the Liberals holding fewer than 30 of 150 lower house seats and the Nationals, 15.

 

The Nationals won’t sit in shadow cabinet, meaning they won’t hold sway over policies and the half-dozen MPs who were around the table will take a pay cut.

 

The Coalition last broke up in 1987 for about four months.

 

Littleproud left the door open for a future arrangement, saying the two parties would still work together to fight the Labor government.

 

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley faces the task of rebuilding the Liberals after a wipeout at the May 3 election.

 

The break-up would give Ley the time and space she needed to rebuild her party, Littleproud said.

 

“They are going on a journey of rediscovery and this will provide them the opportunity to do that without the spectre of the National Party imposing their will,” he said.

 

Littleproud denied the Nationals were a drag on the Liberal vote in the inner cities.

 

Their policies were popular, especially in their regional seats, and others such as the push to scrap public sector working from home entitlements - spearheaded by Liberal senator Jane Hume - were electoral poison, he said.

 

https://7news.com.au/news/bombshell-as-nationals-break-up-coalition-agreement-with-liberals-c-18752172

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdYveTTnwME

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 20, 2025, 3 a.m. No.23058414   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2194

>>23012385

>>23045675

>>23053647

Anthony Albanese formally invites Pope Leo XIV to Australia in Vatican meeting

 

Stephen Dziedzic - 20 May 2025

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met privately with Pope Leo XIV at the Apostolic Palace in Vatican City, formally inviting the new pontiff to Australia for a major Catholic conference that Sydney will host in 2028.

 

Mr Albanese met Leo XIV the day after the new pope's inaugural mass in Rome, hours after the pontiff met US Vice-President JD Vance.

 

He is the first prime minister to have a private audience with the pope since Kevin Rudd, who met Pope Benedict XVI in 2008.

 

The ABC has been told that Mr Albanese and the pope discussed their shared concerns about conflicts around the world and the humanitarian catastrophes they have wrought.

 

The pope also blessed rosary beads that had been owned by the prime minister's mother Maryanne, a staunch Catholic who passed away in 2002.

 

On Sunday Pope Leo XIV called for peace in Gaza, Myanmar and Ukraine during a Sunday blessing at the end of his inaugural mass in St Peter's Square.

 

Leo said he hoped negotiations between Moscow and Kyiv would bring a "just and lasting peace" in Ukraine and offered prayers for the people of Gaza who were "reduced to hunger" by conflict.

 

During their meeting on Monday local time, Mr Albanese gifted the new pope a framed Indigenous artwork by artist Amanda Westley, who is part of the Ngarrindjeri clan in South Australia.

 

The prime minister also issued a formal letter of invitation to Pope Leo XIV to attend the International Eucharistic Congress, which Sydney will host in 2028.

 

The congress is typically held every four years, and is expected to draw thousands of Catholics from around the world to Australia.

 

Benedict XVI was the last pope to visit Australia, for World Youth Day in 2008.

 

The prime minister had earlier met briefly with Pope Leo XIV on Sunday after the mass and had a "very warm" discussion before their longer meeting on Monday afternoon.

 

Mr Albanese said that during that brief discussion, the pope had "expressed his affection for Australia".

 

He said he had told Leo that Australia's 5 million Catholics "would be watching and wishing him well".

 

The prime minister also reflected briefly on his own personal Catholic faith and history, saying his late mother would have been delighted to see him attend the Papal Inauguration mass as prime minister.

 

"I spoke to him about my mother [who] would be I'm sure looking down from heaven with the biggest smile she's ever had, the fact that her son was at the inaugural mass of a pope in the Vatican, was really quite extraordinary" he said.

 

"So, for me, it was a very personal moment as well, and it was a personal discussion."

 

The prime minister has now left Rome and will stop off in Singapore for a lightning-quick meeting with Prime Minister Lawrence Wong before returning home.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-20/anthony-albanese-formally-invites-pope-leo-xiv-to-australia/105312312

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 20, 2025, 3:07 a.m. No.23058421   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3142 >>4549 >>8072 >>2145

Australia rebukes Israel in joint statement demanding aid for starving Gazans

 

Matthew Knott - May 20, 2025

 

Australia has joined a coalition of 23 countries demanding the full resumption of humanitarian aid into Gaza and accusing Israel of politicising the delivery of essential food and medicine to Palestinian civilians.

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Monday that Israel would allow some aid to enter Gaza after a two-month blockade, but international aid organisations say this will not be nearly enough to meet the needs of the local population and will risk the lives of aid workers.

 

Netanyahu has said that Israel will take full control of the strip as he ordered the Israeli military to intensify ground operations in the ravaged strip, including by instructing civilians to leave the southern city of Khan Yunis.

 

Penny Wong and the foreign ministers from 22 other nations said in a joint statement they could not support the limited aid delivery the Israeli government had proposed.

 

“It places beneficiaries and aid workers at risk, undermines the role and independence of the UN and our trusted partners, and links humanitarian aid to political and military objectives,” the foreign ministers said.

 

“Humanitarian aid should never be politicised, and Palestinian territory must not be reduced nor subjected to any demographic change.”

 

However, Australia has not gone as far as Canada, France and the United Kingdom, which threatened “concrete actions” against Israel, including sanctions, in a separate statement unless it halts the renewed military offensive in Gaza and lifts aid restrictions. Shortly after the first few aid trucks entered Gaza, the three labelled the aid “wholly inadequate” and called on Israel to stop its “egregious” expansion of operations in the strip.

 

Alongside Wong, the foreign ministers who signed the 23-nation joint statement are representatives from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK.

 

“As humanitarian donors, we have two straightforward messages for the government of Israel: allow a full resumption of aid into Gaza immediately and enable the UN and humanitarian organisations to work independently and impartially to save lives, reduce suffering and maintain dignity,” the foreign ministers said.

 

“We remain committed to meeting the acute needs we see in Gaza.”

 

The foreign ministers continued: “Food, medicines and essential supplies are exhausted. The population faces starvation. Gaza’s people must receive the aid they desperately need.”

 

They also issued a “firm message that Hamas must immediately release all remaining hostages and allow humanitarian assistance to be distributed without interference”.

 

Save the Children chief executive Mat Tinkler urged Wong to go further and join France, the UK and Canada by threatening sanctions against Israel.

 

“We are well beyond the point of words – Australia must now be prepared to match its strong rhetoric with decisive action,” he said.

 

The United Nations’ humanitarian chief, Tom Fletcher, said the resumption of limited aid delivery was a “welcome development” but described it as “a drop in the ocean of what is urgently needed”.

 

Netanyahu said Israel had devised a new model of aid delivery that would provide “just enough to prevent hunger”.

 

Addressing Israelis who oppose the delivery of humanitarian aid to Gaza, he said a “red line” was approaching in the form of famine and that even strong supporters of Israel, including US senators, had expressed concerns about the humanitarian situation.

 

Netanyahu said in a video message: “They come to me and say this, ‘We’re giving you all the support to achieve victory. But there’s one thing we cannot accept. We cannot handle images of starvation’.”

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australia-blasts-israel-in-joint-statement-demanding-aid-for-starving-gazans-20250520-p5m0nc.html

 

https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/penny-wong/media-release/joint-donor-statement-humanitarian-aid-gaza

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 20, 2025, 3:32 a.m. No.23058451   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8452 >>2253

>>22968851

AUKUS: Donald Trump’s billionaire envoy joins Keir Starmer in show of force for nuclear submarine pact

 

Rob Harris - May 20, 2025

 

1/2

 

London: British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared AUKUS as central to his government’s defence policy, pledging unprecedented investment and warning that the UK must treat defence as “the first thought in the morning and the last at night”.

 

Starmer was joined by new US ambassador Warren Stephens – a billionaire private banker and big Republican donor – who threw his full support behind the AUKUS pact at a packed event inside the Palace of Westminster on Monday night (Tuesday AEST), calling it “vital” to global peace, security and prosperity.

 

“This is not just a project,” Starmer told MPs, diplomats and defence leaders in a surprise appearance at the gathering.

 

“It is a national endeavour … AUKUS strengthens the bonds between our three nations, and it shows that when we talk about security and stability, we mean it – in the Indo-Pacific and here at home.”

 

The All-Party Parliamentary Group on AUKUS event at the House of Lords marked Stephens’ first public appearance since his arrival in London.

 

He used the opportunity to send a clear message: Donald Trump backs AUKUS.

 

“The vital partnership of our three countries cannot be overstated … President Trump, and I know this to be true as it has been repeatedly proven throughout history.”

 

Stephens said AUKUS could also drive prosperity through an innovative private sector, adding that government works best when “we get out of the way and let our businesses innovate, compete and collaborate to improve people’s lives”.

 

The remarks from the banker-turned-diplomat, who gave at least $US6 million ($9.3 million) to Trump’s election campaign, appeared as a clear pitch to those concerned about the pact’s future after the president’s return to the White House.

 

“This alliance enjoys broad bipartisan support,” said the former chief executive of financial services company Stephens Inc.

 

“I’m sure that you all are aware that bipartisanship is certainly not always the case in American politics these days. However, it is when it comes to AUKUS.”

 

Stephens said it was reassuring to see that that same support was reflected in the room – which included Australian high commissioner Stephen Smith and former defence minister Linda Reynolds – adding that AUKUS was “a partnership built on trust”.

 

“The United States is proud to stand alongside Britain and Australia, two of our closest allies, as we deepen our collaboration to respond to a changing world,” Stephens said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 20, 2025, 3:34 a.m. No.23058452   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23058451

 

2/2

 

His remarks come at a pivotal moment for the pact. Nearly four years after its dramatic announcement, AUKUS is shifting from high-level co-ordination to complex implementation.

 

Announced in 2021, Pillar I of the agreement aims to deliver Australia with three nuclear-powered Virginia-class submarines from the US and for Australia to build five new nuclear-powered attack submarines named SSN-AUKUS. The first of those will arrive in the late 2030s, and Australia’s first domestically built sub in the early 2040s.

 

Pillar II focuses on joint development of advanced defence technologies, including AI and quantum.

 

While AUKUS aims to strengthen defence ties in the Indo-Pacific, former Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull has voiced concerns, questioning whether Australia would ever receive a US nuclear-powered submarine.

 

The US faces challenges in its own naval capabilities, with senior Pentagon officials also questioning the feasibility of the submarine deal, given current shipbuilding limitations.

 

Starmer, meanwhile, used the moment to double down on defence, announcing the UK’s biggest military investment since the Cold War.

 

“In February, I announced the largest sustained increase in defence spending since the Cold War. That will come on stream in 2027 and then up to 3 per cent of GDP in the next parliament,” he said.

 

But he said AUKUS was about more than money. “Alongside the pure money comes the biggest shift in mindset, I think certainly in my lifetime – to see security and defence not just as one priority amongst many, but as the central organising principle of government.”

 

He pointed to AUKUS’s industrial impact, including thousands of jobs already created in the cities of Barrow and Derby, and the role of British businesses in building the next generation of nuclear-powered submarines and advanced technology systems.

 

“This is transformational,” Starmer said. “An investment in our collective security and a reminder today and every day of the service out there of people who are risking their lives to keep us safe.”

 

Starmer said he had attempted to demonstrate both by naming former national security adviser Sir Stephen Lovegrove as his special AUKUS representative.

 

“It absolutely demonstrates the seriousness with which we take this project,” he said.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/world/europe/trump-s-billionaire-envoy-joins-starmer-in-show-of-force-for-aukus-20250520-p5m0lp.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 21, 2025, 2:31 a.m. No.23062839   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2840 >>2196

>>22986131

>>23027918

>>23058406

Liberals back Nationals' split as 'necessary reset' after election lashing

 

Olivia Caisley - 21 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Some senior Liberals have quietly voiced support for the Nationals' decision to walk away from the Coalition, describing the dramatic split as a necessary — if uncomfortable — reset following the opposition's devastating federal election defeat, even as Liberal luminary John Howard calls on the parties to reunite.

 

While few are willing to endorse the move publicly, multiple Liberal MPs told ABC News the Coalition had become politically untenable, with the Nationals increasingly seen as obstructive on key policy fronts — particularly on climate policy — and a drag in crucial metropolitan electorates.

 

"This gives us breathing space," one MP said.

 

"After a loss like that, everything has to be on the table."

 

Another added: "This helps us as Liberals rebadge and reposition. It's clear that the link with the Nationals was compromising our policies and hurting our brand appeal, especially in the cities.

 

"They were net beneficiaries in the relationship. We were net losers in electoral terms and the link with the 'climate deniers' of Barnaby [Joyce] and [Matt] Canavan hurt us greatly in cities, with women, and with non-boomer voters."

 

A third Liberal was more philosophical: "Maybe you have to hit rock bottom before you start to rebuild and part of hitting rock bottom is this split."

 

But Mr Howard told ABC AM he was "very concerned" about the separation and urged the parties to come to a resolution.

 

"I would urge the leaders of those parties to work very hard to put the Coalition together," he said.

 

"It is my very strong opinion that policy differences are best resolved within the framework of the Coalition.

 

"If the two parties remain separate for too long away from the Coalition then the differences on policy will harden and will be more difficult to resolve."

 

Mr Howard, who was prime minister from 1996 to 2007, said he had been able to resolve policy differences within the Coalition, and he urged Nationals leader David Littleproud and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley to remember the parties' "glory days" had been when they were united.

 

Mr Littleproud announced the bombshell split just before midday on Tuesday, citing a breakdown in negotiations over demands to enshrine policies such as the development of nuclear energy, expanded divestiture powers for supermarkets, a $20 billion regional future fund, and enforceable service obligations in regional areas in the Coalition agreement that binds the two teams.

 

A joint statement from Ms Ley and the Liberal leadership emphasised that Coalition agreements had historically focused on cabinet role allocation rather than binding policy positions. It also noted that the Nationals had refused to uphold shadow cabinet confidentiality, which obliges shadow ministers to adhere to unified joint-party stances.

 

As one Liberal MP put it: "The Nats' demands were clearly over the top this time around — we could never have agreed to them."

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 21, 2025, 2:33 a.m. No.23062840   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23062839

 

2/2

 

As the Liberal Party comes to terms with its worst defeat since its founding, there is growing consensus that the separation should remain in place for at least 18 months, and potentially through to the next federal election. One source suggested the split should have happened "years ago".

 

Former Liberal MP Jason Falinski, who lost his Sydney seat of Mackellar to independent Sophie Scamps in the 2022 teal wave, said the split was necessary.

 

"The Coalition suffers from the structural problem that the leader of the Libs is the leader of the Coalition and the leader of the Nats is leader of the Nats. It means no-one is ever standing up for urban Liberals ever — and you end up in this electoral situation. It's absurd and time for a reset."

 

Several Liberals said the two parties were stronger together in the long run but they described the split as a strategic and essential step to making the party competitive again in urban electorates.

 

One MP cited internal Coalition polling that showed the party's appeal had collapsed among voters under 45 and women under 55, with climate change emerging repeatedly as a top reason for voter rejection of the party's platform.

 

"They don't see us as able to deal with the challenges of the 21st century," one MP said.

 

"They see us as regressive, stuck in another time and they cite people like Matt Canavan and Barnaby Joyce as the problem."

 

Despite holding just nine of the country's 88 metropolitan electorates, some Liberals remain optimistic about a path to victory in 2028.

 

"If we actually set ourselves on the right direction, focus on the people we want to represent and whose votes we need to win, then we will win the next election," one said.

 

"We need to have discipline and faith because there'll be a lot of tough times ahead. We have to stop talking to ourselves about ourselves and say to the Australian people that we may be fewer in number but we have the values you are looking for."

 

As part of the response to defeat, a sweeping review is next on the agenda.

 

Multiple sources told ABC News that former Liberal senator and Australia's one-time ambassador to the United States, Arthur Sinodinos, along with former Senate president Scott Ryan, were considered key contenders to lead the post-mortem.

 

Two sources dismissed the 2022 election review — conducted by Liberal senator Jane Hume and Liberal strategist Brian Loughnane — as ineffective and said the party had to be more fearless and forensic this time around.

 

"The Hume-Loughnane review was a joke," one MP said, declaring lessons were not learned from that defeat.

 

Another echoed the sentiment: "We need people to conduct this review who haven't been driving the same tired strategy for 35 years. People who can tell truth to power."

 

Some Liberals argue the party's issues go beyond the Nationals. At least two MPs in inner-city seats pointed to former opposition leader Peter Dutton as a greater electoral liability at the 2025 federal poll than Mr Joyce or Senator Canavan in the election result.

 

Following the split, the Liberals now hold 28 seats in the House of Representatives and the Nationals retain 15. Labor is expected to hold 94 seats.

 

While the Nationals and Liberals will now appoint their own policy spokespeople, the Liberals will serve as the official opposition in parliament.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-21/liberals-back-nationals-split-as-necessary-reset/105316456

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QJ4gERYm1ow

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 21, 2025, 2:39 a.m. No.23062845   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2847 >>0694 >>2269

>>23032055

>>23045840

Anthony Albanese to visit China for second time amid Xi Jinping's push for 'mature' ties with Australia

 

Bang Xiao - 21 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will travel to China later this year to meet President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, marking his second official visit to China in two years.

 

The ABC understands the prime minister will attend the Annual Leaders' Meeting, part of a resumed high-level dialogue last held in Canberra in June 2024 during Mr Li's visit to Australia.

 

The trip follows a warm personal letter from Mr Xi congratulating Mr Albanese on his re-election.

 

In the message, Mr Xi highlighted China's interest in "promoting a more mature, stable and productive" relationship with Australia, a deliberate nod to Beijing's desire to build sustained engagement with the Labor government.

 

The second visit places Mr Albanese among a small group of Australian prime ministers to be invited to Beijing so frequently.

 

He made stabilising ties with China a core foreign policy priority during his first term, resuming ministerial dialogue and steering the relationship out of a prolonged diplomatic freeze.

 

During his first trip to China, in November 2023, Mr Xi invited him to return and see more of the country, reinforcing what both sides now describe as a "comprehensive strategic partnership".

 

The trip was widely seen as a diplomatic breakthrough, not only securing the release of detained Australian journalist Cheng Lei after three years in custody, but also resulting in the removal of all remaining trade impediments imposed on Australian exports during the Coalition government.

 

The date of the meeting is yet to be announced by Mr Albanese.

 

Strategic window amid global trade realignments

 

News of the visit comes as Mr Albanese wraps up his visit to Indonesia, where he met President Prabowo Subianto, and to Rome, where he met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and attended the inauguration of Pope Leo XIV.

 

The ABC understands the meetings in China are likely to occur against the backdrop of a 90-day pause in the US-China tariff stand-off, with both Beijing and Washington stepping back from further escalation until August.

 

While Australia is not directly involved in the trade war, the temporary reprieve has opened up space for middle powers to pursue their own trade and diplomatic interests.

 

John Fitzgerald, emeritus professor at Swinburne University of Technology, says the visit shows the Australia-China relationship is "back on track", but Canberra must continue to navigate a shifting geopolitical landscape in the region.

 

"The visit has to be a good thing — but it's also a return to what used to be normal," Dr Fitzgerald said.

 

"There were routine, regular bilateral leadership meetings and a Comprehensive Strategic Dialogue with China, held annually in both countries."

 

Dr Fitzgerald said Australia was long seen as needing to balance its economic ties with China against its security alliance with the United States — but that balance has become less clear since Donald Trump came to power.

 

"Australia still has a balancing act," he said.

 

"It's more like balancing Australia's economic dependence on China — and China's willingness to leverage that dependence against Australia's need to build more comprehensive security and defence relations with other countries in the region and with Europe."

 

Re-engaging with Canberra is part of China's broader effort to shore up key economic partnerships amid a shifting global trade landscape.

 

The largest export market for Australia, worth over $210 billion a year, has been reopened under Mr Albanese's administration, delivering tangible gains across critical sectors.

 

According to government records from China, more than 40 official Chinese delegations have visited federal, state and territory governments in Australia since May 2022, with most concentrated in Victoria, New South Wales and the ACT.

 

The delegations have focused on trade, education, clean energy and cultural exchange, reflecting growing state-level engagement alongside the top-level diplomatic reset.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 21, 2025, 2:41 a.m. No.23062847   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23062845

 

2/2

 

Trade pact bid and Taiwan complication

 

When the two leaders meet, Beijing is expected to raise China's application to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP).

 

As chair of the pact this year, Australia plays a central role in discussions among the 12 member economies, all of which must unanimously approve any new entrant.

 

China has long sought membership, but Taiwan's parallel bid has made the process diplomatically sensitive, as Beijing has made clear its opposition to Taiwan's inclusion.

 

However, Dr Fitzgerald said that if meeting the criteria for entry to the CPTPP was the main consideration — which included being a free market for trade and business — "then clearly the People's Republic of China doesn't meet those criteria. Taiwan does".

 

"So in a way, it's a measure of how China is leveraging its hold over Australia.

 

"It's a political decision — not one based on economic or trade considerations."

 

Australia's relationship with Taiwan remains unofficial under its One China policy.

 

Support for the status quo across the Taiwan Strait is a bipartisan position in Canberra, alongside the view that economic engagement with China can coexist with support for Taiwan's democratic values.

 

Mr Albanese's challenge will be to balance Australia's strategic interest in a rules-based Indo-Pacific with the economic opportunity of deeper trade with China.

 

Tourism bounces as trade ties set to deepen

 

Mr Albanese has repeatedly said his government will "cooperate with China where we can, disagree where we must and engage in the national interest".

 

During his multiple meetings with his Chinese counterpart in his last term, he consistently raised human rights and consular issues alongside regional security concerns.

 

The case of detained Australian writer Yang Hengjun is expected to be raised once again after he sent an open letter from prison thanking the Australian government for its ongoing efforts to secure his release.

 

Dr Yang, who has denied espionage charges, received a suspended death sentence last year. He remains imprisoned in Beijing and is entering his sixth year in detention.

 

The case will likely be in the spotlight, as will visa policy and business and cultural exchanges between the two countries.

 

China's decision to offer 30-day visa-free entry for Australians, in place until the end of 2025, has already triggered a sharp rise in travel and education interest.

 

According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 580,500 Australian residents visited China in 2024 — an 85 per cent jump from 313,240 the year before.

 

Further easing of trade barriers and discussions on two-way investment are also likely to be on the agenda, including renewable energy cooperation and the lease of Darwin Port to Chinese company Landbridge, a recurring point of concern in Australia's national security debates.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-21/anthony-albanese-to-meet-xi-jinping-in-china/105312020

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 22, 2025, 1:57 a.m. No.23067420   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7424 >>2269 >>9989 >>0691 >>2196

>>22986131

>>23027918

>>23058406

Coalition seeks to reverse break-up just two days after sensational split

 

Natassia Chrysanthos - May 22, 2025

 

1/2

 

The Coalition could come back together within weeks after Nationals leader David Littleproud and Liberal leader Sussan Ley agreed to put their next steps on hold while they search for a fix that will allow their MPs to walk back into parliament together.

 

Littleproud announced the dramatic about-face in a snap press conference in Canberra on Thursday, just two days after he walked away from the Coalition partnership – the first split in 38 years.

 

He said it followed a meeting with Ley on Thursday morning, in which he agreed to her request that he give her time to convene a meeting of Liberal MPs to discuss the Nationals’ four policy demands for a Coalition agreement.

 

Both Littleproud and Ley had planned to unveil their separate portfolio spokespeople on Thursday afternoon. But Littleproud said he had sent his team home from Canberra “in good faith”, and that Ley would also refrain from unveiling her frontbench pending further Liberal party room meetings.

 

“This is a positive step forward, one in which we’ve always said we’d be productive and constructive, and I think the Nationals have acted in good faith,” he said.

 

“I’m proud to say that we’ll allow this process to take place and the Liberal Party to convene at whatever period is for them and convenient for them, and I think that is the way forward in a mature and sensible.

 

“I’ve always said that I’d be constructive moving forward … This will allow time for a process for Sussan Ley to call her party room together to discuss those four policy areas.”

 

The Nationals had demanded that four policies be enshrined in the next Coalition agreement: lifting the ban on nuclear energy, divestiture powers for supermarket chains, a $20 billion regional future fund, and service obligations for regional areas.

 

But Ley said she could not commit to those demands until the Liberals had undergone a full policy review that she had promised her party room and Australian voters after a thumping election loss.

 

Littleproud had also requested that Nationals MP be exempt from shadow cabinet confidentiality, which obliges frontbenchers to maintain the joint party position on policy issues. Ley rejected this.

 

On Thursday, Littleproud said he understood Ley’s reasons for denying that request and would not be pushing for it going forward.

 

Ley welcomed that commitment “as a foundation to resolve other matters” in a statement issued shortly after Littleproud’s announcement.

 

“Earlier today, I wrote to, and met with, David inviting him to re-enter good-faith negotiations. I am pleased he has accepted,” she said.

 

“In relation to the policy positions proposed by the National party room, consistent with my consultation commitment, the Liberal Party will consider these, utilising our party room processes.

 

“It has always been the Liberal Party’s objective to form a Coalition and we welcome The Nationals’ decision to re-enter negotiations.”

 

Ley had reached out to Nationals MPs Michael McCormack, Barnaby Joyce and Darren Chester to salvage the situation on Wednesday night and Thursday morning, after this masthead reported that the three MPs, as well as Victorian MP Sam Birrell, expressed concerns about the split in a party room meeting.

 

Chester and McCormack had privately urged Littleproud to make a deal with Ley, after a range of party elders, including former Liberal prime ministers John Howard and Tony Abbott, publicly opposed the split.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 22, 2025, 1:58 a.m. No.23067424   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23067420

 

2/2

 

Public ructions precede Ley and Littleproud’s agreement

 

Hours before the pause in the Coalition split, sour public disputes emerged. Nationals Senator Bridget McKenzie appeared on the ABC’s 7.30 on Wednesday night to discuss the split, where she said Ley’s refusal to enshrine four Nationals’ policy demands in the Coalition agreement had been the sole reason the party walked away on principle.

 

McKenzie denied that the Nationals’ refusal to guarantee shadow cabinet confidentiality, which binds opposition frontbenchers to joint party room decisions, had played a part, as Ley claimed.

 

Ley’s office texted host Sarah Ferguson during the broadcast, according to the ABC, to dispute McKenzie’s version of events.

 

“It is not correct to suggest shadow cabinet solidarity was not a sticking point. We have it in writing that it was a requirement from their leader’s office to ours,” the spokesperson’s message said.

 

“Her language was deliberate to make it sound like it was just about the policies. That is just not correct.”

 

McKenzie later told 7.30 she stood by her comments on the program.

 

A letter sent from McKenzie to Liberal senator Michaelia Cash has also surfaced, revealing the Nationals senator had floated a split before Ley had been elected as Liberal leader.

 

Her central concern was the defection of Northern Territory senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price to the Liberals just days after the election – a decision orchestrated by Liberal leadership challenger Angus Taylor that led Nationals senators to lose their party status as their numbers dropped below the threshold.

 

McKenzie penned the note on May 12, according to reports in news.com.au.

 

“Depending on the outcome of negotiations between our two parties over coming weeks, the Nationals Senate party room will need to consider our position with respect to sitting with the Liberal Party as a Coalition in the Senate chamber,” the letter stated.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/ley-and-littleproud-in-crisis-talks-to-avert-split-20250522-p5m18n.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KL-YxYvlbJk

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 22, 2025, 2:18 a.m. No.23067458   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2197

‘Look at Australia’: Trump ambushes South African president over ‘white genocide’

 

Michael Koziol - May 22, 2025

 

1/2

 

Washington: US President Donald Trump confronted his South African counterpart with unfounded claims of a genocide of Afrikaner farmers, and ranted extensively about the American media, in another extraordinary and tense Oval Office meeting with a foreign leader.

 

Trump dimmed the lights and played a video purporting to back up his assertions about the state-sanctioned mass murder of Afrikaners, the white ethnic minority that ruled South Africa during apartheid, as the country’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, was made to watch.

 

Trump twice cited Australia as evidence during the exchange, claiming both Australia and the United States were being flooded with white South African farmers. Dozens arrived in the US last week after the Trump administration fast-tracked their approval as refugees.

 

“You take a look at Australia, they’re being inundated and we’re being inundated with people that want to get out,” Trump said. “This is a very serious situation and … if we had a real press, this would be exposed.”

 

Trump held up printouts of articles about white farmers whom he said had been the victims of farm attacks, including robberies, land dispossession and murders.

 

Gang violence is rife in South Africa, although as Ramaphosa and other officials pointed out during the Oval Office meeting, most murder victims in South Africa are black.

 

“You’re taking people’s land away from them,” Trump told Ramaphosa.

 

“We have not,” Ramaphosa responded.

 

Trump continued: “And those people in many cases are being executed. And they happen to be white, and most of them happen to be farmers. That’s a tough situation, I don’t know how you explain that. How do you explain that?

 

“We have thousands of people that want to come into our country. They’re also going to Australia, in a smaller number … They’re white farmers and they feel like they’re going to die.”

 

Later, the White House issued links to several media reports it said proved Trump was right about the situation in South Africa. It included two reports from Australia’s news.com.au from 2017 and 2018, and a television editorial by Sky News Australia’s Rita Panahi.

 

The tense exchange did not rise to a shouting match, but represented the most contentious Oval Office meeting since Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance ambushed Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in late February.

 

The video shown in the Oval Office on Wednesday, Washington time, included clips from an incendiary speech by Julius Malema, leader of the communist Economic Freedom Fighters political party, insisting South Africans would occupy land without regard for the law.

 

“We don’t care, we can do whatever we want to do,” Malema said in the clip.

 

Ramaphosa told Trump that Malema belonged to a minority party that was allowed to exist under the South African Constitution and that his words did not constitute government policy.

 

At one point, Trump handed the article print-outs to Ramaphosa and said: “Those are all recent, those are all deaths.”

 

Ramaphosa said he appreciated that the US, as a South African partner, was raising genuine concerns about crime and would be happy to discuss them away from the cameras.

 

“We were taught by Nelson Mandela that whenever there are problems, people need to sit around a table and talk about it,” he said, referring to the former anti-apartheid activist who became South African president after decades in prison.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 22, 2025, 2:23 a.m. No.23067465   🗄️.is 🔗kun

2/2

 

The meeting, which was attended by South African-born billionaire and Trump adviser Elon Musk, was also notable for Trump’s targeting of an NBC journalist who asked about Qatar’s gift of a luxury Boeing 747-8 to the US government. The jet is to be fitted out as Air Force One and will then be transferred to Trump’s presidential library at the end of Trump’s term, in effect making it his own.

 

The US formally accepted the $US400 million ($621 million) plane on Wednesday, with chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell saying it had complied with “all federal rules and regulations”.

 

Immediately after the Oval Office saw the South Africa video, NBC journalist Peter Alexander began to ask about the Qatari plane.

 

Trump, who has been accused of corruption by soliciting and accepting the offer, interrupted and unleashed a torrent of abuse.

 

“What does this have to do with a Qatari jet? They’re giving the United States Air Force a jet, OK, and it’s a great thing,” he told Alexander.

 

“This is NBC trying to get off the subject of what you just saw. You are a real – you’re a terrible reporter. Number one, you don’t have what it takes to be a reporter, you’re not smart enough.

 

“You ought to go back to your studio at NBC because [Comcast chief executive] Brian Roberts and the people that run that place, they ought to be investigated. They are so terrible … and you’re a disgrace. No more questions from you. His name is Peter someone, he’s a terrible reporter.”

 

Trump constantly returned to the subject of the media after that, calling Alexander an “idiot” and a “jerk”, and asserting that if the US press wasn’t “fake”, they would give greater coverage to the plight of white South African farmers. “They won’t talk about it because they’re all guys like that idiot,” he said.

 

In 2018, Australia’s then home affairs minister Peter Dutton proposed granting special refugee visas to white South African farmers, noting there were already large numbers of expatriates living in Australia.

 

“They work hard, they integrate well into Australian society, they contribute to make us a better country and they’re the sorts of migrants that we want to bring into our country,” he said at the time.

 

However, it was reported in 2020 that no further South Africans had been accepted under the humanitarian program, despite a surge in applications.

 

According to rejection letters obtained by The Australian at the time, applicants were told crime and violence were widespread in South Africa but not systematic or discriminatory.

 

White South Africans made up about 7 per cent of South Africa’s 60 million-plus population as of 2022.

 

The latest South African crime figures, which are not broken down by race, show there were 6953 murders between October and December 2024, including 12 people killed in farm attacks, the BBC reports. Of the 12, one was a farmer, while five were farm dwellers and four were employees, who are likely to have been black.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/look-at-australia-trump-ambushes-south-african-president-over-white-genocide-20250522-p5m170.html

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/05/president-trump-is-right-about-whats-happening-in-south-africa/

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xhoHMQxojk

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 22, 2025, 2:54 a.m. No.23067527   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7531 >>9997 >>4587 >>2786 >>2197

>>23041388

>>23041418

Investigators probe Ben Roberts-Smith over more murders and video drinking from dead man’s prosthetic limb

 

Nick McKenzie - May 22, 2025

 

1/2

 

The secretive agency investigating war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith over multiple murders, including cases not canvassed in his marathon defamation trial, has secured the co-operation of new witnesses.

 

Amid the damning fresh evidence is footage of the disgraced ex-soldier swilling beer from the prosthetic leg of an Afghan man he executed.

 

Roberts-Smith’s comprehensive loss before the full bench of the Federal Court – which affirmed the finding that the Special Air Service Regiment veteran ordered the murder of four Afghans – paves the way for the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) to move to prosecute the former corporal.

 

The OSI is examining suspected murders beyond the four cases that were part of the ex-soldier’s failed bid to clear his name.

 

Five sources with knowledge of the OSI’s ongoing four-year investigation said its investigators had secured co-operation from key witnesses who had not participated in Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial.

 

The OSI is working closely with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions as it builds its case against Roberts-Smith, having collected statements from over a dozen SASR soldiers who claim Roberts-Smith arranged or participated in executions, including an incident in which he kicked a bound civilian off a small cliff.

 

The OSI has also uncovered a video of Roberts-Smith drinking from the prosthetic leg of a man he had earlier executed during an Easter Sunday 2009 operation targeting a compound called Whiskey 108.

 

The video was filmed in a makeshift bar called the Fat Lady’s Arms at the Australian army base in southern Afghanistan and contradicts Roberts-Smith’s evidence during his defamation trial when he told Justice Anthony Besanko he had never drunk from the plastic leg.

 

During his opening remarks at the start of the case, Roberts-Smith’s barrister, Bruce McClintock, told the court: “My client did not drink from the leg. The respondents have been desperately trying to find evidence that he did, but he never did.”

 

When he was directly asked in court during cross-examination, “Did you yourself drink from the leg?” Roberts-Smith replied: “No, I didn’t.”

 

However, the video uncovered by the OSI shows the disgraced soldier being passed the prosthetic leg before sculling from it during a party at the Fat Lady’s Arms.

 

On Tuesday, the full bench of the Federal Court released their judgment, explaining why they upheld Justice Besanko’s 2023 decision that Roberts-Smith was complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners, including the man with the prosthetic leg, while deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012.

 

Federal Court justices Nye Perram, Anna Katzmann and Geoffrey Kennett found the evidence was sufficiently cogent to conclude that Roberts-Smith was a war criminal who had disgraced his country and the SASR, including by having machine-gunned the unarmed prisoner with a prosthetic leg outside Whiskey 108.

 

The three senior judges said the latter finding was based on the compelling testimony of three of Roberts-Smith’s fellow SASR soldiers.

 

“The problem for [Roberts-Smith] is that, unlike most homicides, there were three eyewitnesses to this murder,” the three judges concluded.

 

“When all is said and done, it is a rare murder that is witnessed by three independent witnesses. This strength of this evidence cannot be erased, and is in no way undermined, by peripheral inconsistencies.”

 

The appeal court also said that “the killing of the man with the prosthetic leg in such a dramatic fashion does suggest a certain recklessness or perhaps even brazenness” on Roberts-Smith’s part.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 22, 2025, 2:56 a.m. No.23067531   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23067527

 

2/2

 

While Roberts-Smith still denies wrongdoing, and has vowed to continue his legal fight to clear his name by challenging the four judges’ findings in the High Court, the revelation the OSI has also secured the co-operation of witnesses who did not testify in the defamation trial, or gave only limited testimony, is a blow to the disgraced ex-soldier and former Seven West Media executive.

 

The OSI is staffed with elite detectives from state police forces, including handpicked homicide investigators.

 

Sources said the OSI’s inquiries had proceeded far more slowly than the agency had hoped, but this was due to a painstakingly exhaustive and risk-averse approach adopted by its chief, former top prosecutor and judge Mark Weinberg.

 

Weinberg has sought to avoid the legal pitfalls that led to the abandonment in 2021 of an earlier federal police war crimes investigation targeting Roberts-Smith.

 

The OSI is working with the AFP to target Roberts-Smith and has secured more evidence and witness co-operation than the stymied federal police probe.

 

The OSI probe is not only aimed at seeking to prosecute Roberts-Smith but several of his accomplices who, like the disgraced war hero, were also found to have lied during the defamation proceedings to cover up war crimes.

 

Billionaire Gina Rinehart emerged this week as Roberts-Smith’s latest mega-wealthy public supporter, describing him as “brave and patriotic” and claiming the reporting of his actions in Afghanistan had weakened the defence forces.

 

Her statement has angered SASR veterans who believe the mining magnate’s defence of the war criminal is misguided and offensive to Australian veterans who repeatedly deployed to Afghanistan and are against the execution of civilians and prisoners.

 

“If Rinehart has read the full court’s judgment, she must know it was other regiment blokes that are the ones that have stood up against his [Roberts-Smith’s] crimes. There is nothing honourable about kicking an Afghan farmer off a cliff,” one SASR insider who served alongside Roberts-Smith said.

 

A second SASR insider who also served in Afghanistan said he believed Rinehart’s advocacy was at odds with “the views of most Australians who don’t want their soldiers executing civilians or prisoners”.

 

“We don’t do that,” the SASR veteran said, claiming that Roberts-Smith’s decision to spend millions of dollars on defamation proceedings had brought untold “trauma” for soldiers subsequently caught up in his legal fight.

 

Rinehart has refused to say if she is funding Roberts-Smith’s ongoing legal battles, with his former employer, Channel Seven owner Kerry Stokes, no longer footing the war criminal’s bill.

 

Rinehart was approached for comment.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/national/investigators-probe-ben-roberts-smith-over-more-murders-and-video-drinking-from-dead-man-s-prosthetic-limb-20250521-p5m0y9.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 22, 2025, 3:07 a.m. No.23067540   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2242

>>22959621

>>22981980

'Recovered' Assange promotes Cannes documentary

 

AFP / news.com.au - May 22, 2025

 

Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has "recovered" from his years in detention, his wife told AFP, as a new documentary about him premiered at the Cannes film festival on Wednesday.

 

Assange is at the world's biggest film festival to promote "The Six Billion Dollar Man" by American director Eugene Jarecki but is not yet speaking publicly.

 

After posing for photographers on Tuesday wearing a T-shirt with the names of killed Gaza children, he reappeared Wednesday for the red-carpet screening wearing a black tuxedo.

 

The 53-year-old former hacker has declined all interview requests, however, with his wife Stella Assange saying that "he'll speak when he's ready."

 

But she was upbeat about his health and said he was already thinking about his next steps.

 

"We live with incredible nature at our doorstep (in Australia). Julian's very outdoorsy. He always has been. He's really recovered physically and mentally," Stella, a Spanish-Swedish lawyer, told AFP.

 

Assange was released from a high-security British prison last June after a plea bargain with the US government over Wikileaks's work publishing top-secret military and diplomatic information.

 

He spent five years behind bars fighting extradition from Britain and another seven holed up in the Ecuador embassy in London where he claimed political asylum.

 

'Right side of history'

 

Award-winning director Jarecki said his film aimed to correct the record about Assange, whose methods and personality make him a divisive figure.

 

"I think Julian Assange put himself in harm's way for the principle of informing the public about what corporations and governments around the world are doing in secret," Jarecki told AFP.

 

Anyone willing to trade years of their life for their principles, "I think you'd have to look at that person as having heroic qualities," he added.

 

The film includes never-seen footage, including personal videos handed over by Stella, a Wikileaks lawyer who had two children with Assange while he was living in the Ecuadorian embassy.

 

It also features testimony from people who helped spy on Assange, including an Icelandic FBI informant and a private security agent who said he installed bugs accessed by US security services in the Ecuadorian embassy.

 

Ecuador's left-wing former president Rafael Correa, who offered Assange asylum in the Ecuadorian embassy in London, also attended Wednesday's screening.

 

"I believe we were on the right side of history," he told AFP.

 

Jarecki's film seeks to address criticism of Assange, notably that he endangered lives by publishing unredacted US documents which included the names of people who had spoken to American diplomats or spies.

 

'Complete fabrication'

 

The film extensively features supportive figures, while giving little time to opposing views.

 

"Baywatch" actress and Assange friend Pamela Anderson makes an appearance, as does American whistleblower Edward Snowden, and left-wing Greek ex-minister Yanis Varifakis who compares the Wikileaks founder to Greek god Prometheus.

 

The film lays the blame for the publication of a trove of 251,000 US diplomatic cables by Wikileaks in 2011 on veteran investigative British journalist David Leigh, alleging he published the password to access the database.

 

Leigh, who collaborated with Assange while working at the Guardian newspaper, told AFP he had never been contacted by Jarecki and he called the theory "a complete fabrication".

 

"It was Julian and Julian alone who did it. He's been trying to find an excuse ever since," he said by phone.

 

Jarecki also dismissed any links between Wikileaks and Russian intelligence services over the leak of Democratic Party emails ahead of the 2016 US presidential election which embarrassed Democrat candidate Hillary Clinton.

 

An investigation by US special counsel Robert Mueller, who probed alleged Russian interference in the 2016 vote, found evidence that Russian military intelligence hacked the Democratic Party and passed the information to Wikileaks.

 

The documentary also examines the role of Swedish prosecutors in starting a sexual assault investigation into Assange, concluding that there was no case to answer.

 

https://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/recovered-assange-promotes-cannes-documentary-about-his-life/news-story/88198e46fa5f893f57571aea9f2c9986

 

https://x.com/wikileaks/status/1925339756394594583

 

https://x.com/wikileaks/status/1924797064526942633

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 23, 2025, 5:52 a.m. No.23072269   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2273 >>9989 >>0691 >>2199

>>23027918

>>23058406

>>23067420

Liberals and Nationals closer on Coalition fix, spotlight moves to Littleproud leadership

 

Paul Sakkal - May 23, 2025

 

1/2

 

The Liberal and National parties are inching towards reforming the Coalition after Liberal MPs gave Sussan Ley in-principle agreement for most of David Littleproud’s policy demands, but speculation is growing about Littleproud’s future as leader of the regional party.

 

Ley convened a lively party room meeting on Friday afternoon at which her MPs gave their leader the authority to strike a deal with the Nationals to create a joint shadow cabinet by the time parliament resumes, days after Littleproud sparked chaos by splitting from the Liberals.

 

Critically, the Nationals ditched the plan to build seven nuclear power sites, paving the way for a watered-down Coalition policy to merely lift the moratorium and allow for potential private investment into nuclear energy.

 

The in-principle agreement does not extend to the precise details of Littleproud’s demands, which are still due to be thrashed out in a shadow cabinet. Moderate Liberal MPs expressed concerns about Littleproud’s demand, first reported in this masthead, to extend forced supermarket break-up laws to big-box retailers such as Chemist Warehouse and Officeworks.

 

Liberals also have doubts about the administration and funding of the $20 billion regional building fund, highlighting the potential for a bumpy path back to reunification.

 

The turbulent week in right-wing politics has led to chatter inside the Nationals about whether Littleproud could survive the affair.

 

His leadership is bolstered by the lack of widespread support for any other contender, but former leader Barnaby Joyce told at least one colleague on Friday that Littleproud’s position was precarious.

 

Joyce has been unwell and does not have the numbers to win. But according to party sources unable to speak publicly, Joyce told colleagues he would be open to supporting another former leader, Michael McCormack.

 

McCormack stressed on Friday morning that Littleproud was not under threat. But asked if he fully backed Littleproud, McCormack uttered the same words as Scott Morrison did in the days before toppling Malcolm Turnbull: “I’m ambitious for him”.

 

“It’s been messy, it’s been really messy and for people on the outside looking in they just wonder what the hell is going on,” McCormack said on ABC Canberra.

 

One Nationals MP, who asked not to be named so they could speak freely, said “the clock is now ticking” on Littleproud’s leadership, but his backers insist such talk is hypocritical because his decisions were made in conjunction with his MPs.

 

“Three people have significantly damaged themselves this week, David, Bridget [McKenzie] and Kevin [Hogan]. And this was all self-inflicted. I’m not sure if David is terminal but it has been a very bad week,” the second Nationals MP said.

 

Senior Nationals MP Darren Chester told Sky News that he backed Littleproud “without equivocation”.

 

“It was only a matter of 12 or 13 days ago, David was elected by our party room … so people do need to remember that the decisions that were taken this week were taken with the majority support of the party room,” he said.

 

Nationals senator Matt Canavan, who challenged Littleproud for the leadership, said: “David has done a great job for the Nationals this week and he has delivered real results after the Liberals’ backdown”.

 

“I know the Liberals are unhappy, but if some of them fought the Labor Party as hard as they have been fighting the Nats this week, we may have done a lot better at the election,” Canavan said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 23, 2025, 5:53 a.m. No.23072273   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23072269

 

2/2

 

Before Friday’s virtual hook-up, the Liberal Party leadership released a document to MPs outlining in detail Littleproud’s wishes.

 

The policy document, obtained by this masthead, confirmed the Nationals were no longer wedded to using public funds to build nuclear reactors at seven sites around the country.

 

The demand, as expressed to Ley and outlined in the document, was: “Commit to removing the moratorium on nuclear energy at a minimum, with a review of the remaining elements of the nuclear policy.” Littleproud also suggested on Thursday that his nuclear energy demand extended only to lifting the moratorium.

 

The watered-down demand from the Nationals, which led the charge for nuclear power, indicates that the proposal to spend billions on nuclear sites is viewed as politically tricky even by the regional party, potentially consigning the plan to the dustbin of political history.

 

The Liberals’ document states such a move would not be a troublesome break from the current position, indicating the demand was likely to be accepted by the party despite some discomfort with the energy plan.

 

Liberal senator Maria Kovacic, a party moderate, called for nuclear energy to be scrapped two weeks ago after Labor made its high cost – which it misleadingly claimed would be $600 billion – a key focus to discredit Peter Dutton’s economic credentials during the election campaign.

 

On Littleproud’s other requests, the document showed he was seeking $1 billion per year for a regional building fund that was not agreed to pre-election. The document also states his request for “big-box” retailers to be added to the policy for divestment of anticompetitive supermarkets might be a small step further than the pre-election plan.

 

And on expanding the universal mobile service obligation in the regions, the document noted the policy “was not agreed through a formal process but announced during the campaign” by Littleproud.

 

Littleproud announced he would split from the Liberal Party on Tuesday before agreeing to resume talks on Thursday after Ley told him she would convene her MPs to assess his demands. Ley’s move was triggered by Littleproud saying for the first time on Thursday morning that he would honour shadow cabinet solidarity in a coalition.

 

Without telling his party room, Littleproud had earlier asked Ley if Nationals in a shadow cabinet could publicly dissent on agreed policies such as the net zero climate target; Ley flatly rejected the demand and Littleproud’s Nationals allies were frustrated he had not told them about his request.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/liberals-set-to-agree-to-watered-down-nuclear-plan-leaked-document-shows-20250523-p5m1lp.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 23, 2025, 6:56 a.m. No.23072429   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2432 >>4582 >>2199

Kevin Rudd says Donald Trump’s ban on foreign students at Harvard is ‘distressing’

 

JACK QUAIL - 23 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Donald Trump’s administration on Thursday revoked Harvard’s right to enrol foreign students – more than a quarter of its annual intake – in a major escalation of the President’s fight with one of the world’s most storied universities.

 

The university in Cambridge, Massachusetts, quickly slammed the move as “unlawful” and said it would hurt both the campus and the country, while one student said the community was “panicking”.

 

Australia’s US Ambassador Kevin Rudd said the decision to block foreign students from enrolling at Harvard University was “distressing” for Australian students.

 

Mr Rudd says he is working with the Trump administration following its decision.

 

“We are monitoring closely developments at Harvard University in relation to the administration’s statement this afternoon on the future enrolment of international students,” Dr Rudd wrote in a post to social media platform X on Friday.

 

“I know this will be distressing for Harvard’s many Australian students. The Embassy is working with the United States Government to obtain the details of this decision so that Australian students can receive appropriate advice.”

 

According to the Ivy League institution, approximately 120 Australian students are enrolled at the university.

 

The decision dramatically deepens the rift between Mr Trump and the university, and will force thousands of international students enrolled at the university to either relocate to another institution or leave the US entirely.

 

Mr Trump is furious at Harvard, which has produced 162 Nobel prize-winners, for rejecting his demand that it submit to oversight on admissions and hiring over his claims that it is a hotbed of anti-Semitism and “woke” liberal ideology.

 

“Effective immediately, Harvard University’s Student and Exchange Visitor (SEVIS) Program certification is revoked,” Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem wrote in a letter to the Ivy League institution, referring to the main system by which foreign students are permitted to study in the US.

 

The loss of such a large proportion of the student body could prove to be a huge financial blow to Harvard, which charges tens of thousands of dollars a year in tuition.

 

Harvard, which has sued the government over a separate raft of punitive measures, quickly fired back, calling the move unlawful. “We are fully committed to maintaining Harvard’s ability to host our international students and scholars,” it said in a statement, adding that it was working to offer students guidance and support.

 

“This retaliatory action threatens serious harm to the Harvard community and our country, and undermines Harvard’s academic and research mission.”

 

Karl Molden, an international student from Austria, said he had applied to study at Oxford University in the UK because he feared such measures.

 

“It’s scary and it’s saddening,” the 21-year-old government and classics student told AFP. “I love Harvard, and getting into the school has been the greatest privilege of my life.

 

“It’s definitely going to change the perception of … students who (might) consider studying there – the US is getting less of an attractive spot for higher education.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 23, 2025, 6:57 a.m. No.23072432   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23072429

 

2/2

 

Last month, Mr Trump threatened to stop Harvard from enrolling foreign students if it did not agree to government demands that would put the private institution under outside political supervision.

 

“As I explained to you in my April letter, it is a privilege to enrol foreign students,” Ms Noem wrote.

 

“All universities must comply with Department of Homeland Security requirements, including reporting requirements under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program regulations, to maintain this privilege,” she said.

 

“As a result of your refusal to comply with multiple requests to provide the Department of Homeland Security pertinent information while perpetuating an unsafe campus environment that is hostile to Jewish students, promotes pro-Hamas sympathies, and employs racist ‘diversity, equity, and inclusion’ policies, you have lost this privilege.”

 

More than 27 per cent of Harvard’s enrolment was made up of foreign students in the 2024-25 academic year, according to university data.

 

Fourth-year US student Alice Goyer told AFP “no one knows” what the development would mean for international students already enrolled.

 

“We just got the news, so I’ve been getting texts from a lot of international friends, and I think everyone’s just – no one knows,” she said. “Everyone’s panicking a bit.”

 

On whether students would willingly transfer to other institutions, as suggested by Ms Noem in the letter, Ms Goyer said: “I doubt people would do that. I would hope maybe there’s going to be a legal battle that’ll take place.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/trump-administration-revokes-harvards-right-to-enrol-foreign-students/news-story/182e2aca4026bf7cce119784029670fc

 

https://x.com/Sec_Noem/status/1925612991703052733

 

https://x.com/AmboRudd/status/1925669885784293626

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 24, 2025, 6:05 a.m. No.23076612   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3147 >>3516 >>2140

>>22986131

>>22998090

>>23002836

Zoe Daniel calls for Goldstein recount after Tim Wilson wins by 260 votes

 

Cara Waters - May 24, 2025

 

Zoe Daniel has requested a recount in Goldstein after counting today arrived at a final margin of 260 votes in favour of Liberal Tim Wilson.

 

The Australian Electoral Commission automatically undertakes a recount if the margin is under 100 votes, but candidates can also request one if they have sufficient grounds.

 

A spokesman for the AEC said the full distribution of preferences was finalised today in favour of Wilson.

 

“A recount request is being considered, and an announcement regarding that decision will be made when able,” he said.

 

Daniel said: “In light of the very tight margin and several errors being picked up in the portion of the count that was included in the distribution of preferences, leading to unusual fluctuations and large numbers of votes moving to and fro in the final stages of the count, I have taken expert advice and asked the AEC to consider whether a full recount is appropriate.

 

“There are also several outstanding questions regarding the broader count which would be resolved by a recount. As always, I will respect the process and await the commission’s decision.”

 

Posting to social media platform X, Wilson said the AEC had confirmed the final Goldstein margin of 260 votes in his favour.

 

“We have continually had a majority of votes for nearly three weeks, and it never fell below 100 which is the threshold for an automatic recount,” he said.

 

Wilson said the votes had been counted at least four times and Liberal and teal volunteers had scrutineered the count.

 

“And now the former MP is asking for a full recount,” he said. “At some point we should respect the professional staff at the [AEC]. I wish Zoe Daniel, her family and staff well in the next chapter. I hope she finds peace.”

 

Daniel initially claimed victory in Goldstein on election night but postal votes came in strongly in Wilson’s favour leading him to claim a win in the seat two weeks ago.

 

However, Daniel did not concede and since then the count in Goldstein has continued, with Daniel narrowing the margin to as little as 128 votes to Wilson at one stage.

 

Daniel has been getting advice from data scientist Simon Jackman, who has pointed out the increased size of electorates since the 100-vote trigger for a recount was decided in 2007, and to anomalies in the count.

 

Jackman said the AEC’s 100-vote guidance was implemented following the McEwen recount of 2007.

 

“That 100 votes is not key to an error rate, it’s an absolute number,” he said. “It was conjured up in 2007 when electorates were a lot smaller than they are now.”

 

Jackman said that because Goldstein was 40 per cent larger than the average electorate in 2007, he thought Daniel could make the argument that a 100-vote margin in 2007 was a 140-vote margin today.

 

Jackman also said there were anomalies in the Goldstein count that might deserve a recount.

 

“If you look closely at the Goldstein count, there are a few hiccups in the count,” he said. “The AEC or someone has made a mistake at the Hampton pre-poll voting centre where a huge bundle of votes that were given to Zoe Daniel were then taken away, and it looks like they may have gone over to the Greens candidate in large [part].”

 

Jackman said the count had been “a bit bumpy” in some polling centres in Goldstein, particularly the Brighton pre-poll centre, and a recount would help dissipate any concerns.

 

“Why not take another two or three days to just put any issues to bed and that way no one’s got any argument at all?” he said.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/zoe-daniel-calls-for-goldstein-recount-20250522-p5m1fx.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 24, 2025, 6:13 a.m. No.23076633   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7979 >>2269

Cheap Aussie ‘Mozzie’ all the buzz to replace global market-leading Chinese drones

 

BEN PACKHAM - May 22, 2025

 

An Australian technology company is poised to meet a critical challenge for the nation’s security, designing a $5000 drone for military use with domestically sourced parts and those from friendly countries.

 

The only Chinese component in Grabba Technologies’ Mozzie drone is its electric motor, and the company is working with two local firms that are close to producing Australian-made alternatives.

 

The privately owned Brisbane company was selected for the challenge by Defence’s Advanced Strategic Capabilities Accelerator, which needed an affordable multi-mission drone under 2kg for use by the Australian Defence Force and national security agencies.

 

The locally made drone gives Australian and allied users a trusted alternative to Chinese drones that dominate the global market.

 

The ASCA challenge followed the removal from service of more than 800 Chinese-made drones that had been operated by the ADF, and 41 in use with the Australian Border Force.

 

The Mozzie, which can undertake surveillance missions or drop bombs on enemy soldiers, will meet US “blue list” guidelines for technology products with entirely friendly-nation supply chains.

 

The explosion in drone warfare seen in Ukraine has piled pressure on the Australian government to bring uncrewed systems into service as rapidly as possible.

 

Grabba Technologies is set to sell 260 of the drones to Defence for testing by the army, navy and air force, and hopes to sell tens of thousands more to the ADF and allied militaries, and law enforcement agencies.

 

The basic Mozzie drone can be tailored to meet the requirements of each military service, with ­additional protection, radio technologies, cameras and payloads.

 

Grabba executive chairman Ross McKinnon said the challenge was a tough one, requiring the company to build the drone “from the ground up” to meet ASCA requirements.

 

The company had to design many of the drone’s components, including its base station and on-board gimbal to keep its camera steady, in order to keep costs down and ensure a trusted supply chain.

 

“That was actually a really good thing, because it meant that we weren’t just rebuilding a foreign product,” Mr McKinnon said.

 

“This is a world-leading drone in its category, sub-2kg, but low-cost and Australian-made.”

 

The company will sell the drones for $5000 each to the Australian government, which kicked in $2.2m to develop it, but will charge about twice that for an ­export version. The next-cheapest drone on the international market with equivalent specifications costs about $18,000.

 

“There’s actually a gap in the market for a blue-list equivalent drone at this price point. So we can sell this and export this because of the constraints the commonwealth set on us,” Mr McKinnon said.

 

The company is also developing larger versions of the drone, up to one tonne.

 

The ASCA challenge was aimed at developing a sovereign drone that could be produced at scale to meet emerging strategic challenges.

 

Mr McKinnon said while the market wasn’t yet big enough to pump out large quantities of the aircraft, the company could rapidly ramp up production “if we get in a scrap”.

 

He said the company was already working with international buyers, including the US Department of Homeland Security, and had partnered with Australian-owned company EPE, which supplied robots to allied militaries.

 

“They say our drone is the best and they are taking it to the global market,” Mr McKinnon said.

 

The ADF has lagged many militaries in getting uncrewed systems into service, acquiring its first lethal drones last year.

 

It purchased an undisclosed number of US-made Switchblade 300s – a lightweight “loitering ­munition” – and has a variety of unarmed drones used for intelligence, ­surveillance and reconnaissance tasks.

 

Australian taxpayers have also contributed $1bn towards the development of Boeing’s Ghost Bat, a “loyal wingman”-style drone designed to operate with manned fighter jets.

 

Boeing says the uncrewed jet is one of the most advanced aircraft of its kind in the world, but it is years away from entering service and faces stiff competition from ­rivals selected for a key US Air Force program.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/cheap-aussie-mozzie-all-the-buzz-to-replace-global-marketleading-chinese-drones/news-story/d2041abf6b0a500be3d7e105c5eb1bc2

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 24, 2025, 6:35 a.m. No.23076711   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6713 >>2244

As Mel’s gender ‘ricocheted’, she went under a surgeon’s knife

 

A woman is suing the doctors who performed her gender treatment, claiming she could not have given informed consent.

 

Michael Bachelard - MAY 24, 2025

 

1/3

 

A young woman who thought for years she was non-binary or a transgender man is suing two doctors and Monash Health for negligence, claiming gender treatment that included having both breasts surgically removed had caused her “significant injury”.

 

Mel Jefferies, a 33-year-old who was born as female and is now living again as a woman, has launched the civil lawsuit in the Victorian County Court.

 

One of the defendants in the case is Dr Jeff Willcox, a Melbourne GP with an “interest in gay men’s health, sexual health … and transgender health”. The others are Jaco Erasmus, a psychiatrist with a special interest in transgender health, and Victoria’s largest public health service, Monash Health.

 

Jefferies’ statement of claim, recently lodged with the court, accuses all three of falling short of delivering professional standards of care, including those outlined by the widely recognised World Professional Association for Transgender Health. The claim says those standards require doctors to ensure that “anyone experiencing mental health conditions must have these well-managed and thoroughly controlled prior to the commencement of the testosterone treatment”.

 

Jefferies says her years of mental health issues were not under control at the time of her treatment and were exacerbated by the testosterone prescribed by her doctors and surgery.

 

Her statement of claim says she has a permanently “deepened voice, hirsutism, clitoromegaly [a clitoris significantly larger than normal], vaginal pain/discomfort, abnormal body odour and acne, and pelvic floor dysfunction (as indicated by urinary incontinence).”

 

Under Australia’s current model of transgender treatment, known as “affirming care”, people’s gender identity is “affirmed and supported” when it conflicts with the gender they were assigned at birth.

 

“For years I just kept getting affirmed by the medical fraternity and the trans community for something I wasn’t,” Jefferies told this masthead.

 

“They kept telling me, ‘You’re non-binary, trans, maybe you’re non-binary’. I tried to pull away but they just kept pulling me back in … I never developed the discernment to say ‘this isn’t true’.”

 

Her case, filed by Slater and Gordon solicitor Anne Shortall, is one of the few brought in Australia by people who regret their gender treatment. Another is working its way through the courts in Sydney. Shortall declined to comment.

 

If Jefferies’ case proceeds to a judicial decision, it could represent a test case for the duty of care doctors owe towards people seeking affirming care. It comes as the number of young people seeking treatment for gender dysphoria has increased dramatically in the past decade.

 

It also comes as the transgender community and doctors who perform such treatments push for an “informed consent” model of care which would reduce the barriers to treatment, including the requirement for psychological assessments. They also want GPs to be able to treat gender issues as they do more common conditions.

 

Monash declined to comment as the case was before the courts and involved “confidential patient information”. Questions to Willcox were answered by his lawyer, who said he would defend the claim. Erasmus said he could not comment because the matter was before the court.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 24, 2025, 6:36 a.m. No.23076713   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6724

>>23076711

 

2/3

 

The claim outlines Jefferies’ interactions with doctors, starting in 2011, when Willcox first prescribed her testosterone. The Melbourne referral came despite letters from a psychologist and a doctor in Sydney that Jefferies was not ready for the treatment and should have more counselling, including for “social isolation and family dynamics of concern”, and support for her anxiety.

 

“By virtue of the results of the prior consultations, reasonable medical practice … required [Willcox] not commence the testosterone treatment until … the Plaintiff’s mental health difficulties were under control and her mental health stable,” the statement of claim alleges.

 

Instead, the document says, Willcox started the treatment “without consideration of the [earlier] recommendations”.

 

In two 2012 referral letters for gender and psychological treatment, outlined in the claim, Willcox acknowledged that Jefferies “has a complex mental health history” that included “body image disorder; eating disorder (adult); depression” as well as “suicidal ideation … disordered eating/body dysmorphia” and likely borderline personality disorder.

 

Some of the key symptoms of borderline personality disorder are impulsivity and instability in self-image and interpersonal relationships.

 

However, one of the letters written by Willcox said: “Despite the coexisting mental health issues, [Jefferies] has always appeared resolute in his desire to transition to the male sex and he feels surgery to remove his breasts is the next stage of this transition.”

 

The legal claim details strong swings in Jefferies’ attitude at the time. Between 2013 and 2017, it says, Jefferies stopped the testosterone treatment – she went on TV and described herself as a “detransitioner” – only to start it again two years later after another prescription from Willcox.

 

At one time she expressed a desire for a hysterectomy, then later said she was happier in her female biological sex. Later still she asked to have her breasts removed because they were “fat” and made her feel like “her skin doesn’t fit properly”.

 

Medical records referred to in the court documents suggest she wanted at times “to be asexual and have all of her reproductive organs removed”, then decided she was comfortable being gender-fluid.

 

Another doctor, who is not being sued, wrote in this period that Jefferies “does not move along the gender continuum but rather ricochets from one side to the other”.

 

The statement of claim also lists a catalogue of psychiatric medications Jefferies was prescribed, including anti-depressant, anti-psychotic and anti-anxiety drugs.

 

In 2017, a gender doctor, who is not named in court documents, referred Jefferies to Monash Health on a recommendation from Erasmus. The referral was to convince Monash Health to recommend Jefferies for public funding under Medicare to pay for the mastectomy.

 

A second letter from Erasmus to a plastic surgeon, Dr Andrew Ives, outlines Jefferies’ history of mental health issues but says they were “reasonably well controlled”.

 

Jefferies had “come to the conclusion that he has an unspecified gender identity and does not wish to be perceived as male or female”, the referral letter says.

 

“In a binary society though he would settle for being perceived as male and therefore prefers using male pronouns … In my opinion Mason [the name Jefferies was then known by] has experienced persistent gender dysphoria … he is able to make an informed decision and has the capacity to consent to treatment,” the Erasmus letter says.

 

Jefferies, who was on the consumer advisory panel for the Monash Gender Clinic for a time, now says she should not have been referred for the double mastectomy. Her mental health was “unstable and not well controlled”, according to the claim.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 24, 2025, 6:40 a.m. No.23076724   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23076713

 

3/3

 

In October 2017, Ives – billed on website Transsurgery Australia as “one of the country’s leading Transgender Surgery experts” – removed Jefferies’ breasts. Ives is not a defendant in the lawsuit and also declined to comment while the matter was before the courts.

 

Jefferies claims the treatment exacerbated her self-harm, increased her suicidal thoughts, helped prompt drug overdoses and “the need for repeated psychiatric hospitalisations”. She now has complex and chronic post-traumatic stress disorder, is in partial remission from “alcohol misuse disorder”, and has suffered “irreversible and serious injury to her physical body”, the court documents allege.

 

This masthead does not suggest the defendants are necessarily liable. The case is ongoing and the defendants are expected to file a defence next month.

 

Jefferies is seeking general damages and the cost of mental and physical health treatment.

 

Asked if she bore any responsibility for her insistence, at times, on treatment, Jefferies told this masthead: “I didn’t have the capacity to give consent – most of the time I was in transition I was going through crisis after crisis.”

 

She claimed that she had been influenced by a common belief in the trans community that their families and society would reject them, and if they could not transition, they would suicide.

 

“I didn’t have the ability to think long term. I was warped by the thinking that if I didn’t do this I was going to die,” Jefferies said. “They [the trans community] are in the grips of fear, and an us-versus-them culture. They tell you ‘They hate you, you’re only safe with us’. It’s an intense pressure.”

 

The issue of detransition is controversial in the transgender community. Some say the media over-emphasises stories of detransitioners – stories they say are then co-opted by conservative voices to amplify their argument that transgender medicine has gone too far. Some research insists people who regret their treatment are a tiny proportion, about 1 per cent, of those who undergo it. This figure is disputed by others.

 

Lawsuits have been brought and settled in the past over similar issues. A claim in 2003 against the Monash Gender Dysphoria Clinic was settled, but prompted a review by the chief psychiatrist. That found the clinic’s psychiatrists were not rigorous enough in applying diagnostic criteria.

 

Another legal claim made public in 2009 – two years before Jefferies started treatment – prompted the Monash clinic to close for three months and the forced resignation of its director. Another review followed, which found the clinic needed “better responses to meet the mental health needs of clients”.

 

Jefferies has requested a judge-only trial, two of the defendants want a jury.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellness/as-mel-s-gender-ricocheted-she-went-under-a-surgeon-s-knife-20250521-p5m13t.html

 

 

‘I spent a decade going down the wrong path’: Mel’s regret after transition

 

Lisa Wachsmuth - February 2, 2025'

 

https://archive.vn/dR9km#22494941

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 25, 2025, 3:04 a.m. No.23079989   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2200

>>23058406

>>23067420

>>23072269

Taylor, Tehan and Paterson set for security roles in Ley’s top team

 

SARAH ISON - 25 May 2025

 

Sussan Ley and David Littleproud have agreed that the Nationals will receive six shadow cabinet spots and two outer ministry positions as part of negotiations on a Coalition frontbench that is expected to see Ms Ley’s Liberal rival, Angus Taylor, receive the foreign affairs or defence portfolio.

 

After a tumultuous week that resulted in the Liberal and Nationals leaders poised to announce separate ministries as late as Thursday morning, Ms Ley and Mr Littleproud restarted talks on a Coalition agreement at the weekend and are expected to come to a position on the shadow ministry and policies such as ­nuclear energy in coming days.

 

While Ms Ley reached out to former Nationals leaders Michael McCormack and Barnaby Joyce to broker a resolution to the split before Mr Littleproud agreed to renegotiate, ­neither MP expects to receive a frontbench position thanks to their roles in fuelling Nationals leadership speculation in recent days.

 

“Barnaby (Joyce) and I will still contribute if you know, we’re not selected in that leadership team. And who knows, we’ll probably be sitting up the back together,” Mr McCormack said.

 

The unlikely alliance comes after Mr Joyce rolled Mr McCormack as leader in 2021.

 

Despite suggestions within the Nationals that Mr Littleproud would not remain leader in “the long term” after his decision to split from the Coalition and then backflip on that decision, Mr Littleproud on Sunday said he was “relaxed” about his position.

 

“The vast majority of my partyroom decided to leave the ­Coalition. I enacted what was directed,” he said on Sky News.

 

“We got an outcome over two or three days because of principles over politics … If I have to lose my job for it, I don’t care, but I did what my partyroom said.”

 

Mr Littleproud’s chosen deputy leader, Kevin Hogan, also sought to brush aside leadership questions.

 

“He did it all in line with the partyroom’s procedures and processes, and I think they have great respect for that,” he told ABC. “There are always malcontents in any room.”

 

Nationals and Liberal sources familiar with negotiations over a Coalition said while the question of cabinet spots may have been up for debate before the Coalition nearly split, the matter was now very much settled.

 

“The Nationals will get six (cabinet) spots and two outer ministries,” one senior Nationals MP said.

 

The Australian understands Ms Ley had invited Michaelia Cash and Anne Ruston – the Liberals’ leader and deputy leader of the Senate – along with her deputy Ted O’Brien to Canberra on Thursday, before talks on the Coalition were restarted.

 

Several conservative Liberals raised concern with the position Ms Ley would give Mr Taylor, who lost the battle for Liberal leadership by just four votes and said only the foreign affairs or defence portfolio offered “sufficient” status.

 

Senior Liberal MP James Paterson is expected to take whichever role Mr Taylor didn’t want; Dan Tehan is predicted to be offered home affairs as a “natural next step” from his former job of immigration spokesman.

 

Despite Nationals MPs like Bridget McKenzie arguing for the junior party to be given shadow cabinet roles that allowed for a greater say in economic policy, there are no major changes expected to the usual breakup of roles that sees the Nationals take on portfolios such as resources.

 

While the Liberal partyroom agreed to Mr Littleproud’s four policy demands, which went to nuclear energy, supermarket divestiture laws, resolving telecommunication black spots and invest­ing in regional Australia, some concerns remain over the issue of nuclear and divestiture in particular.

 

Liberal senator Andrew Bragg said while the Liberals could agree to a “technology-agnostic” approach to energy policy that left room for nuclear to be explored, there were definitely risks around implementing divestiture laws.

 

“You wouldn’t want to do anything that was going to damage private investment because it’s on strike under this government,” Senator Bragg told Sky News.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/taylor-tehan-and-paterson-set-for-security-roles-in-leys-top-team/news-story/5a682e59b63af8e71e643c779e73dadd

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 25, 2025, 3:23 a.m. No.23079997   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9999 >>2200

>>23041388

>>23067527

OPINION: Roberts-Smith’s rabid band of supporters has an outspoken new member – Gina Rinehart

 

Roberts-Smith is a murderer. Why do the uber-wealthy defend him?

 

Chris Masters, Investigative journalist - May 25, 2025

 

1/2

 

“What went on over there, stays over there.”

 

“You can’t judge combat from the comfort of an armchair.”

 

“What right have you to tear down our heroes?”

 

“It’s war, for god’s sake.”

 

Since the first public challenges to Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith’s reputation in 2017, those words, this retaliatory refrain, has been unrelenting and unchanged. All in the face of profound evidence revealing Australia’s most decorated living soldier is a war criminal.

 

After last week’s 245-page rejection of Roberts-Smith’s Federal Court appeal and Justice Anthony Besanko’s 726-page ruling in 2023, the keen eyes of four judges have now found to a civil court standard that Roberts-Smith murdered four captives in Afghanistan.

 

Under the Geneva Convention and Australia’s own laws of armed conflict, executing detainees is unlawful. But there are rules and there are norms, and the norms according to the “it’s war” apologists are based on an insiders’ “take no prisoners” realpolitik.

 

Within the Defence diaspora, online debate runs hot and loud. The “I stand with Ben” brigade is undeterred by the court rulings.

 

Brigadier Adrian d’Hage, former head of Defence public relations who was awarded a Military Cross for his service in Vietnam, is taking them on. And he’s far from alone among soldiers with combat experience disavowing the so-called realists’ justification for murder.

 

“That is not the way we fight. We have a long and hard-won reputation as being feared fighters, but fighters who engage according to the Geneva Convention,” d’Hage says.

 

Given many critics’ apparent aversion to examining those pages, here is a distillation of key evidence.

 

On April 13, 2009, Ben Roberts-Smith kicked an old man to his knees and instructed a junior soldier, in an exercise of “blooding”, to shoot him in the head. Soon after, he frogmarched a second Afghan man fitted with a prosthetic leg, threw him to the ground, and killed him with a burst of machine gun fire.

 

On October 12, 2012, a third unarmed and detained man was executed by an Afghan partner force member upon Roberts-Smith’s instruction.

 

And on November 11, 2012, Ali Jan, a father of three with no established links to the Taliban, was handcuffed and kicked over a small cliff by Roberts-Smith, who then ordered two comrades to drag him to cover, where he was shot dead.

 

At numerous speaking events, Age investigative journalist Nick McKenzie and I have argued the following:

 

It is morally wrong to kill or order the execution of captives.

 

It is strategically wrong because it turns the population further against your mission. All those Australian soldiers bravely patrolling the fields of Uruzgan as a protective force against the Taliban were placed at greater risk.

 

And it is wrong to force an act upon a fellow soldier so destructive of conscience and self-respect.

 

Soldiers who have earned the Special Air Service Regiment’s sandy beret are rightly proud. When they returned to civilian life as psychological wrecks because of what they saw and did, as did occur, the damage was obvious.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 25, 2025, 3:24 a.m. No.23079999   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23079997

 

2/2

 

From my own observation, the self-harm to the regiment was the main reason for a brave group of Special Air Service Regiment soldiers to speak up. Nick and I both know they did so with extreme reluctance, all under subpoena, because of a view within the ranks that dobbing in your mate was a worse sin than exposing a war crime.

 

That view was shared by members of the uber wealthy.

 

Billionaire Kerry Stokes has spent millions on Roberts-Smith’s case. Multi-millionaire John Singleton funded a full-page newspaper advertisement describing attacks on the war hero as “disgraceful”. And now Australia’s richest person, Gina Rinehart, is quoted querying why this “brave and patriotic man” should be “under such attack”.

 

I can only wonder what is in their minds. Do they believe that in their real world, ruthlessness is a necessity that should be honoured?

 

Last December, my brother Roy and I spoke to a well-heeled audience of Aussie expats in Singapore. We were warned ahead of time that there would be a pro-Roberts-Smith sentiment and opposition expressed to our reporting.

 

The day before, Roy and I had walked the grounds of the Alexandra Hospital. We found a small plaque commemorating the massacre of 250 patients and staff by Japanese forces on February 14, 1942.

 

I spoke the next day of the shock that is still felt about those helpless victims being dragged into the garden and bayonetted to death. And I asked how we could condemn the Japanese while excusing our own.

 

There was no answer.

 

I am with Albert Camus, who said: “In such a world of conflict, a world of victims and executioners, it is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.”

 

Chris Masters is a Gold Walkley award-winning journalist and author. He was the first Australian journalist to be embedded with special forces in Afghanistan.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/national/roberts-smith-s-rabid-band-of-supporters-has-an-outspoken-new-member-gina-rinehart-20250522-p5m1eb.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 25, 2025, 3:29 a.m. No.23080001   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2201

>>23032082

Footage released of Qld man feared dead in Ukraine

 

Ukraine’s Ambassador to Australia has released footage of the Queenslander feared dead in “Russian-controlled territory”, offering a glimpse into his efforts during the war.

 

Isabella Pesch - May 25, 2025

 

Ukraine’s Ambassador to Australia has released footage of the Queenslander feared dead in “Russian-controlled territory”, offering a glimpse into his efforts during the war.

 

Gladstone builder, Caleb List, joined the Ukrainian foreign legion after he was rejected by the Australian Army.

 

It is understood Mr List went missing and is believed to have been killed following fighting in the Kharkiv region last month.

 

The YouTube video, posted by Ambassador of Ukraine to Australia, Vasul Myroshnychenko on Saturday, offered a glimpse into Mr List’s life on the Ukrainian front lines, where he had been fighting since 2022.

 

At the start of the video, Mr List talks to the camera, stating, “It’s a good fight. It’s a necessary fight, so that is why I am here in the cold freezing my arse off”.

 

A montage of photos and snippets of his efforts with the Ukrainian Army follows, including videos of Mr List during training exercises, working on the ground, and joking with fellow soldiers.

 

The caption for the YouTube video read that it would be “known for certain” whether Mr List was dead once his body, which remained in Russian-controlled territory, could be recovered and identified.

 

“For now, I ask you to remember Caleb. If he is alive, we will work on getting him swapped,” the caption read.

 

“If he is dead, we will mourn him and will never forget his ultimate sacrifice.”

 

A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokesperson said they were aware of people attempting to travel to fight in the war, and a small number of Australians were reported as missing or deceased in Ukraine.

 

“We continue to strongly urge Australians not to travel to Ukraine. It is a ‘do not travel’ zone because the situation is extremely dangerous,” the spokesperson said.

 

The Australian Government’s travel advice for Ukraine remained at “Do not travel due to the volatile security environment and military conflict”. The travel advice for Ukraine was last updated on March 27 and remains current.

 

https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/footage-released-of-qld-man-feared-dead-in-ukraine/news-story/cb6cdf8a579ef2c59645e15d50ab6858

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7nsS3A2tC8

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 25, 2025, 3:40 a.m. No.23080012   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0015

Father of choirboy who claimed son was abused by Cardinal George Pell settles case against Catholic Church

 

The father of a dead choirboy who claimed his son was abused by George Pell has settled his landmark legal case against the Catholic Church a day before he was due to give evidence.

 

Shannon Deery - May 25, 2025

 

1/2

 

The father of a dead choirboy who claimed his son was sexually assaulted by Cardinal George Pell has sensationally dropped his landmark legal case against the Catholic Church.

 

The Sunday Herald Sun can reveal the man – known only as RWQ – has setlled a claim against the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne after a protracted three-year fight.

 

It is understood the man is battling cancer and ended the claim a day before lawyers were due to record his evidence in a rare hospital bedside sitting.

 

The terms of the settlement are unclear but it is understood the church admitted no fault or wrongdoing but will pay the man some of his legal costs but not damages.

 

The man launched legal action after Pell, who died in 2023, was freed from prison following a successful High Court appeal that saw a string of convictions for child sexual assault quashed.

 

The choirboy’s father was seeking damages for mental harm suffered as a result of being informed by police of the alleged abuse of his late son.

 

Pell was convicted of abusing the choirboy, who cannot be identified, who died of a drug overdose in 2014 and never disclosed any allegations of abuse to his parents or authorities.

 

But another choirboy, known only as Witness J, testified that both boys were both abused in the sacristy of St Patrick’s Cathedral after Sunday mass in 1996.

 

After failing to appeal a string of convictions in Victoria’s Court of Appeal, Pell was ultimately acquitted by a unanimous 7-0 decision of the High Court.

 

Despite ending his claim, RWQ’s case will leave lasting ramifications for other psychological injury claims in Victoria because of the Church’s efforts to knock it out of court.

 

It led to a hugely significant High Court decision that ruled “secondary” victims were free to pursue damages in such claims.

 

The Church unsuccessfully argued that parents, siblings, friends and families of abuse victims should be ineligible to launch claims.

 

Legal experts warned the court decision would lead to a flood of claims by secondary seeking damages against a range of organisations for psychological injury.

 

They could include the state government, WorkSafe, the TAC, schools, clubs, kinders, religious organisations and social and cultural groups.

 

Before his shock death following complications from hip replacement surgery in January 2023, Cardinal Pell was preparing to give evidence in RWQ’s case.

 

The trial was expected to rehash all of the evidence heard at Pell’s two criminal trials and appeals before the Supreme Court and High Court.

 

Cardinal Pell spent 405 days in prison after being convicted on four counts of indecent assault and one of sexual penetration of a child over the alleged abuse of the two choirboys.

 

He was released after the High Court quashed his convictions, finding the jury who found him guilty was wrong to do so, having not considered the entirety of the evidence at trial.

 

From the time he was originally charged in 2017 Pell vehemently denied any wrongdoing.

 

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/father-of-choirboy-who-claimed-son-was-abused-by-cardinal-george-pell-drops-case-against-catholic-church/news-story/ac9ce892281770abe64ca9dbe4de8463

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=RWQ

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 25, 2025, 3:41 a.m. No.23080015   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23080012

 

2/2

 

Q Post #2590

 

Dec 12 2018 11:00:11 (EST)

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6487315/High-profile-figure-convicted-suppression-orders-prevent-publication-persons-identity.html

https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/why-the-media-is-unable-to-report-on-a-case-that-has-generated-huge-interest-online-20181212-p50lta.html

https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/nsw/an-awful-crime-the-person-is-guilty-but-we-cant-publish-the-story-ng-4be7ee27075d4fb302aae9989c40ad34

[Cardinal Pell]

Dark to LIGHT.

Q

 

https://qanon.pub/#2590

 

https://archive.ph/20181212163320/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6487315/High-profile-figure-convicted-suppression-orders-prevent-publication-persons-identity.html

https://archive.ph/20181212122705/https://www.theage.com.au/national/victoria/why-the-media-is-unable-to-report-on-a-case-that-has-generated-huge-interest-online-20181212-p50lta.html

https://archive.ph/20181212193749/https://www.perthnow.com.au/news/nsw/an-awful-crime-the-person-is-guilty-but-we-cant-publish-the-story-ng-4be7ee27075d4fb302aae9989c40ad34

 

 

Q Post #2594

 

Dec 12 2018 11:29:43 (EST)

 

>He was the vatican treasurer I'm sure that carries some weight

 

#3 in the pecking order.

Define 'pecking' [animals].

Q

 

https://qanon.pub/#2594

 

 

Q Post #2894

 

Feb 25 2019 20:08:29 (EST)

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/02/25/australia/cardinal-george-pell-vatican-conviction-intl/index.html

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-47366113

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-abuse-pell/vatican-treasurer-pell-found-guilty-of-abusing-two-choir-boys-22-years-ago-idUSKCN1QF009

Many more to come?

Dark to LIGHT.

Q

 

https://qanon.pub/#2894

 

https://archive.ph/20190301020521/https://edition.cnn.com/2019/02/25/australia/cardinal-george-pell-vatican-conviction-intl/index.html

https://archive.ph/20190301014904/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-australia-47366113

https://archive.ph/20190301014445/https://www.reuters.com/article/us-australia-abuse-pell/vatican-treasurer-pell-found-guilty-of-abusing-two-choir-boys-22-years-ago-idUSKCN1QF009

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 25, 2025, 3:51 a.m. No.23080024   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2240

>>22959474

>>23024217

Virginia Giuffre: Jeffrey Epstein survivor farewelled in private in Perth

 

Shannon Hampton - 25 May 2025

 

Virginia Giuffre - a high-profile survivor of billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein who alleged she was sex trafficked to Prince Andrew - has been farewelled by her family in Perth.

 

Ms Giuffre, 41, is believed to have taken her own life at her farm in Neergabby, about 80km north of Perth, last month.

 

The West Australian understands Ms Giuffre was cremated in recent days at Pinnaroo Valley Memorial Park in Padbury.

 

Ms Giuffre’s death attracted worldwide headlines, but it is understood she was farewelled in private, with no funeral being publicly advertised.

 

WA Police confirmed at the weekend that officers have concluded her death is not being treated as suspicious. Major crime detectives are in the process of preparing a report to give to the coroner.

 

Police were called to Ms Giuffre’s property about 9.50pm on April 25 after she was found unresponsive. There was nothing that could be done to save her, and she was declared dead at the scene.

 

Her death came less than a month after she posted to social media that she had just “four days to live” after a crash with a school bus near her home, which police later dismissed as a minor incident.

 

Ms Giuffre shot to prominence in 2015 after filing a lawsuit in a New York court against Epstein’s longtime companion and confidante, Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging the pair kept her as a “sex slave” for the rich and powerful.

 

She said she was recruited by Maxwell when she was 16 or 17 and working at Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump’s club in Palm Beach.

 

Ms Giuffre told the BBC in 2019 she was “passed around like a platter of fruit” to Epstein’s friends, flown around the world on private jets.

 

Prince Andrew was among those powerful friends, and she claimed she was forced to have sex with him when she was 17. He strongly denies the allegations.

 

A now-infamous photograph shows him arm-in-arm with Ms Giuffre yet in a television interview with the BBC, he said he had no memory of meeting her.

 

When she died, Ms Giuffre was facing a charge of breaching a family violence restraining order taken out by her estranged husband, Robert Giuffre.

 

The charge was discontinued earlier this month, with a court told the allegation related to claims she sent Mr Giuffre several text messages.

 

The former couple moved to Perth from Cairns in 2020, buying a $1.9m six-bedroom, four-bathroom ocean-front property in Ocean Reef with her husband, Robert.

 

Ms Giuffre left behind three children - Christian, Noah and Emily.

 

Her family said holding her newborn daughter had inspired her to “fight back against those who had abused her and so many others”.

 

“She was heroic and will always be remembered for her incredible courage and loving spirit,” they said. “In the end, the toll of abuse is so heavy that it became unbearable for Virginia to handle its weight.”

 

Lifeline: 13 11 14

 

https://thewest.com.au/news/wa/virginia-giuffre-jeffrey-epstein-survivor-farewelled-in-private-in-perth-c-18799911

 

 

Q Post #4923

 

Oct 21 2020 20:55:05 (EST)

 

https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624

Dearest Virginia -

We stand with you.

Now and always.

Find peace through prayer.

Never give up the good fight.

God bless you.

Q

 

https://qanon.pub/#4923

 

https://qanon.pub/#4568

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 26, 2025, 2:20 a.m. No.23083142   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3145 >>4549 >>8072 >>2145

>>23058421

‘People are starving’: Albanese attacks Israel over ‘outrageous’ Gaza food restrictions

 

Matthew Knott - May 26, 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese is coming under growing internal and international pressure to sanction Israel and recognise Palestinian statehood before a major United Nations conference next month, as the prime minister rounded on the Netanyahu government for limiting the delivery of food and other supplies going into Gaza.

 

Israel last week ended its 11-week blockade of aid entering the ravaged strip but the United Nations and leading international charities argue the trickle of supplies is not nearly enough to meet the demands of Gaza’s 2.3 million people.

 

Australia last week joined 23 other nations to condemn Israel for politicising the delivery of humanitarian aid, but did not sign onto a stronger statement by the United Kingdom, France and Canada warning Israel of sanctions if it did not stop settlement building in the West Bank.

 

The three nations also said they were “committed to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to achieving a two-state solution and are prepared to work with others to this end”, as they noted the UN is preparing to hold a high-level conference on a two-state solution.

 

France and Saudi Arabia will co-host the conference, which is scheduled for June 17-20 in New York. French President Emmanuel Macron has been lobbying fellow world leaders to join a unified effort to recognise a Palestinian state, even if it is opposed by Israel.

 

Australia voted in favour of holding the conference last year in a seven-page resolution calling for the international community to “urgently chart an irreversible pathway towards the peaceful settlement of the question of Palestine and the implementation of the two-state solution”.

 

“Israel’s actions are completely unacceptable,” Albanese told reporters on Monday, using some of his most forceful language on the issue in recent times.

 

“It is outrageous that there be a blockade of food and supplies to people who are in need in Gaza. We have made that very clear by signing up to international statements.”

 

Albanese said he had expressed his criticisms directly to Israeli President Isaac Herzog when they met in Rome on the sidelines of Pope Leo’s inauguration mass.

 

“I made it very clear that Australia finds these actions completely unacceptable and we find Israel’s excuses and explanations completely untenable and without credibility,” he said.

 

“People are starving.”

 

He said Australia did not sign up to the France, Canada and UK stronger comments because it was a G7 statement – even though it did not mention the G7 by name or include the other four G7 nations.

 

He refused to be drawn on whether his government would recognise Palestinian statehood during this term of government.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 26, 2025, 2:21 a.m. No.23083145   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23083142

 

2/2

 

Peter Moss, a spokesman for Labor Friends of Palestine, said Labor branches around the country were fired up by the issue as he called for Albanese to match his criticism of Israel with action.

 

“At a minimum, Australia should immediately support the statement from the United Kingdom, France and Canad and prepare sanctions targeted at Israeli officials responsible for using starvation as a weapon of war,” Moss said.

 

“Australia should also deliver on official Labor policy, supported by the majority of the Australian people, and recognise the state of Palestine at the upcoming UN conference in June.”

 

Labor’s national platform calls on the Australian government to “recognise Palestine as a state” and calls the issue an “important priority”.

 

Former Labor cabinet minister Ed Husic criticised the government for not joining the UK, France and Canada in threatening sanctions against Israel.

 

“Australia could have proudly joined them. We didn’t,” Husic wrote in an opinion piece for The Guardian on Saturday.

 

Australia Palestine Advocacy Network President Nasser Mashni said: “Australia has imposed sanctions on Russia, Iran, Myanmar, in compliance with its obligations to apply pressure to states committing egregious acts of violence and oppression. It’s beyond time for sanctions on Israel.”

 

Alex Ryvchin, the co-chief executive of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, said: “The calls to recognise a Palestinian state and criticisms of Israel distract from what should be the focus of all governments right now, which is ensuring the surrender of Hamas…Such calls play right into Hamas’s strategy of isolating Israel from its western allies no matter the cost in civilian blood.”

 

Save the Children Australia spokesman Aram Hosie said: “Australia must make clear that it simply will not tolerate Israel’s continued bombing and starvation of Gaza’s children without the prospect of serious consequences.”

 

Foreign Minister Penny Wong was among the foreign ministers of 23 nations who wrote in a joint statement that they could not support the limited aid delivery the Israeli government had proposed.

 

“Humanitarian aid should never be politicised, and Palestinian territory must not be reduced nor subjected to any demographic change,” the foreign ministers wrote.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/people-are-starving-albanese-attacks-israel-over-outrageous-gaza-food-restrictions-20250526-p5m288.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 26, 2025, 2:25 a.m. No.23083147   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3516 >>2142

>>22998090

>>23002836

>>23076612

Recount in Goldstein after Wilson’s slim margin prompts request by Daniel

 

Cara Waters - May 26, 2025

 

There will be a partial recount of votes in Goldstein to ensure confidence in the result and the counting process after a request was made by independent Zoe Daniel, the Australian Electoral Commission has announced.

 

Liberal Tim Wilson recorded a slim margin of 260 votes ahead of Daniel after the final count finished on Saturday.

 

A spokesman for the AEC said the decision to conduct the recount was made after advice from the national election manager to the electoral commissioner “to ensure the greatest level of confidence in the final result and the utmost integrity in the counting process”.

 

The recount will begin on Wednesday and will take up to four days.

 

Wilson said he was relaxed about the recount.

 

“We have been very relaxed about every count and recount to date in Goldstein, as we know the count will deliver the result that reflects the will of the people of Goldstein,” he said.

 

However, Wilson said he was worried that data scientist Simon Jackman, who has been advising Daniel, has also advised the Labor Party.

 

“It does not surprise me that it has been revealed the teals have consultants working for them that have also been consulting to Labor, and who have been providing cover to push for this recount,” he said. “I look forward to the conclusion of the partial recount and the declaration of the poll, and thank the AEC staff, all scrutineers and the people of Goldstein.”

 

Daniel said given the corrections picked up in the final stages of the distribution of preferences, the AEC had said it was appropriate and reasonable to do an additional check of first preferences.

 

“Once again, I’d like to thank my scrutineers and AEC staff for their diligence and dedication to the democratic process,” she said.

 

The partial recount will involve a re-examination of all first preference ballot papers for Wilson and Daniel, as well as all informal votes, but the full distribution of preferences will not be recounted.

 

“The recount request submitted by independent candidate Zoe Daniel was carefully considered and was instructive but not determinative, and her request for a full recount has not been granted,” the AEC spokesman said.

 

The spokesman said the count for the distribution of preferences highlighted some discrepancies in the fresh scrutiny count for Goldstein.

 

“The nature of the discrepancies in this case pointed to instances where fresh scrutiny results had been entered into the system incorrectly,” he said. “While the distribution of preferences process enabled these to be rectified for first preference ballot papers for excluded [non-two candidate preferred] candidates, hence the change of margins on a few occasions, it has highlighted a need to re-examine ballot papers not dealt with at distribution of preferences.”

 

The spokesman said the AEC would not undertake a full recount, which would include repeating the recently completed distribution of preferences.

 

“We are satisfied that there was a very high degree of rigor throughout the distribution of preferences process,” he said. “Given the corrections picked up on preference votes in the final stages of the distribution of preferences count, it is reasonable and appropriate to do an additional check of first preference papers for the two final candidates (ballot papers not required to be re-reviewed during a distribution of preferences).”

 

A margin of 100 votes or fewer means there is an automatic recount, but candidates can request one if there are sufficient grounds.

 

Daniel made a request for a recount on Saturday, “in light of the very tight margin and several errors being picked up in the portion of the count that was included in the distribution of preferences”.

 

Candidate requests for recounts are rarely granted, with the last undertaken by the AEC in McEwen in 2007.

 

A recount is also underway in Bradfield in NSW, where the margin was fewer than 100 votes.

 

The AEC spokesman was unable to say how much the recounts would cost.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/recount-in-goldstein-after-wilson-s-slim-margin-prompts-request-by-daniel-20250526-p5m28g.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 26, 2025, 2:35 a.m. No.23083159   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3164 >>3169 >>7093 >>7100 >>0704 >>0715 >>2270

>>22869175 (pb)

>>22964070

>>23032055

Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian hits out over ‘ethically questionable’ Port of Darwin lease buyback

 

China’s ambassador to Australia says Anthony Albanese’s plan to kick out the Chinese-owned operators of the Port of Darwin is “ethically questionable”.

 

Jessica Wang - May 26, 2025

 

The Chinese ambassador to Australia says Anthony Albanese’s promise to boot a Chinese company from operating the Port of Darwin is “ethically questionable,” urging the government to honour the 99-year lease.

 

In a statement released by the embassy on Sunday night, Xiao Qian criticised Australia’s “ethically questionable” behaviour and said port owners Landbridge Group had made “significant investments” after winning a 99-year lease in 2015 for $506m.

 

The comments follow an election promise to buy back the lease, with the Prime Minister threatening direct intervention if the government is unable to find a new buyer.

 

“These efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development,” Mr Xiao said.

 

“Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment.

 

“It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.”

 

Mr Xiao said Landbridge Group had undertaken an “open and transparent bidding process” to secure the commercial contract and urged the Australian government to honour its binding commitments.

 

While he acknowledged that Australia and China were “comprehensive strategic partners”, Mr Xiao said the countries needed to “foster mutual trust”. “We hope the Australian side will view the Darwin Port project objectively, honour its binding commitments under the contract and respect the autonomous decisions made by businesses based on development needs,” he said.

 

“We hope the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government will create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in Australia.”

 

As it stands, Australia’s special envoy for defence and northern Australia Luke Gosling has confirmed he has met with new buyers and said he was committed to ensuring a “good return on investment for the Chinese owners Landbridge”.

 

Returning the port’s ownership to Australian hands was sparked by concerns the critical piece of infrastructure should not be owned by a foreign entity.

 

It was leased to the Landbridge Group in 2015 under the Country Liberal territory government, reportedly taking the federal government by surprise.

 

Landbridge has also maintained the port is not for sale, and confirmed on Monday that it has yet to receive any engagements from any level of government.

 

“It is business as usual at Darwin Port, as we continue to focus on the growth of our operations,” said the group’s Australian non-executive director Terry O’Connor.

 

“Darwin port representatives escorted the Ambassador on a tour of the port during his recent visit to Darwin.

 

“Landbridge welcomes his comments in relation to the Port’s operation and its contribution to the Northern Territory economy.”

 

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/chinese-ambassador-xiao-qian-hits-out-over-ethically-questionable-port-of-darwin-lease-buyback/news-story/017cfd79bed64c6695f8b231d8df0e3d

 

http://au.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/dshd/202505/t20250525_11632718.htm

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 26, 2025, 2:44 a.m. No.23083164   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3169 >>7093 >>7100 >>2270

>>23083159

Chinese ambassador blasts Darwin Port lease plan as 'ethically questionable'

 

Matt Garrick and Oliver Chaseling - 26 May 2025

 

China's ambassador to Australia has fired a warning shot to the Albanese government over its plans to take back the port of Darwin, describing the move as "ethically questionable".

 

The strategically important northern Australian port has been a hotly debated national security issue since it was leased to Chinese firm Landbridge by the NT government for 99-years in 2015.

 

During this year's federal election campaign, both Labor and the Coalition made duelling pledges to get the port "back into Australian hands".

 

Federal Labor has not given a firm indication of exactly how it will do that, but has repeatedly said it has been speaking with Australian firms to possibly take over the lease.

 

Ambassador Xiao Qian published a statement on his website on Sunday, days after making a trip to Darwin where he said he visited the port and met with staff at Landbridge.

 

"A decade ago, the Landbridge Group secured the lease for the port of Darwin through an open and transparent bidding process, fully compliant with Australian laws and market principles," he said.

 

"Over the past 10 years, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in maintaining and building Darwin Port's infrastructure, optimising its operations and management, and expanding its customer sources.

 

"These efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development."

 

Mr Xiao also called on the Northern Territory and federal governments to "honour its binding commitments" under the contract and "respect the autonomous decisions made by businesses made by development needs".

 

"Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment.

 

"It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable."

 

Members of the previous NT government that leased the port to Landbridge have said the decision was made to lease it after the federal government of the day failed to fund needed infrastructure upgrades.

 

Federal Labor meets with potential port buyers

 

Federal Labor has not yet given any firm indication when it will move on its election commitment regarding changing ownership of the port.

 

Last week, MP and special envoy for defence and northern Australia Luke Gosling said he had been meeting with potential buyers.

 

"We want to make sure that there's a good return on investment for the Chinese owners Landbridge as well," he said.

 

"We've no interest in blowing this up into anything, or putting a time limit on negotiations.

 

"The port needs infrastructure development in order to make it more efficient and more effective."

 

Federal Infrastructure Minister Catherine King said the port was a "critical infrastructure asset of national importance".

 

"The Australian government is working closely with the Northern Territory government on next steps," she said.

 

NT Treasurer Bill Yan said his government would work with the Commonwealth in planning for the port's future.

 

"That will be a federal government matter between them of course and the Chinese ambassador," he said.

 

Landbridge has repeatedly said that the port is not for sale.

 

In a statement on Monday, Landbridge's non-executive director for Australia, Terry O'Connor, said Landbridge had "not yet received any engagement from the government at any level".

 

"It is business as usual at Darwin Port, as we continue to focus on the growth of our operations," he said.

 

Mr O'Connor also said Landbridge welcomed the Chinese ambassador's comments "in relation to the port's operation and its contribution to the Northern Territory economy".

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-26/nt-chinese-ambassador-blasts-darwin-port-lease-plans/105323302

 

https://x.com/ChineseEmbinAus/status/1925722332422643771

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 26, 2025, 2:51 a.m. No.23083169   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2271

>>23083159

>>23083164

Chinese Ambassador urges Australia to objectively view Darwin Port project and honor contractual commitments

 

Global Times - May 26, 2025

 

When responding to the Albanese government's pledge during the Australian election campaign to revoke the operating rights of China's Landbridge Group over the Port of Darwin in a joint media interview, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said that it is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.

 

Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese mentioned in April during the election campaign that his government was working on a plan to force the sale of Darwin Port from its Chinese owner on national interest grounds, Reuters reported.

 

During an interview published on the website of the Chinese Embassy in Australia on Sunday, Xiao said that Chinese side has consistently maintained communication with both the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government (where the port is located) through diplomatic channels.

 

He elaborated that a decade ago, the Landbridge Group secured the lease for the Port of Darwin through an open and transparent bidding process, fully compliant with Australian laws and market principles.

 

Over the past 10 years, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in maintaining and building Darwin Port's infrastructure, optimizing its operations and management, and expanding its customer sources, said Xiao.

 

He pointed out that these efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development. Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment. It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.

 

Xiao said the lease agreement is a commercial contract. We hope the Australian side will view the Darwin Port project objectively, honor its binding commitments under the contract and respect the autonomous decisions made by businesses based on development needs, he noted.

 

China and Australia are comprehensive strategic partners. The two sides should foster mutual trust, as mutually beneficial cooperation aligns with our shared interests. We hope the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government will create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in Australia, the ambassador noted.

 

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202505/1334834.shtml

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 27, 2025, 2:02 a.m. No.23087084   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2142

>>22986131

>>22973546

Pro-Voice Liberal says referendum defeat gave the party ‘a false sense of confidence’

 

Michelle Griffin - May 26, 2025

 

The Coalition’s success in defeating the Voice to parliament referendum gave the Liberal party “a false sense of confidence” about its chances of victory in the federal election, says former shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser, who resigned from his opposition portfolio in 2023 in order to campaign for the referendum.

 

Noting that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese “seemed to lose his way” after the Voice referendum was defeated in all states in October 2023, Leeser told ABC’s Afternoon Briefing that this, combined with Albanese’s poor handling of the local antisemitism crisis, “gave so many in our party a false sense of confidence”.

 

Leeser says he was “shocked” that the internal polling conducted for the Coalition by Freshwater’s Mike Turner used the number of Labor voters who voted no in the referendum in his calculations of a swing against the government, which was instead returned in a landslide and is likely to end up with 94 seats, equalling John Howard’s record in 1996.

 

“On one level, there is nothing wrong with trying to target those Labor voters who voted no in the referendum campaign,” he said, saying Howard targeted those who rejected the republic proposal in 1999, but only to remind them of other issues such as border security.

 

“I thought it was very strange there was such a focus even on the campaign itself,” Leeser said.

 

“Part of the reason my colleagues were successfully defeating the referendum was in 2023 the issue did not seem to be one of top priority for Australian voters. Certainly, in 2025, it was completely irrelevant and I had no idea why the issue kept reappearing in our campaign.”

 

While former opposition leader Peter Dutton regularly raised the Voice as one of several examples to demonstrate that Labor was out of touch, he campaigned in the final days of the campaign on the claim that the government had a “secret plan to legislate the Voice” after Foreign Minister Penny Wong told the Betoota Talks podcast that she thought “we’ll look back on it in 10 years’ time and it’ll be a bit like marriage equality”.

 

Albanese ruled out bringing back the Voice and accused Dutton of “verballing” Wong.

 

Leeser said he was “completely surprised” by the focus in the last week on Welcome to Country and the Voice.

 

“It indicated we were not in touch with the concerns of ordinary Australians. People were not talking to me about those issues until we raised them; they were concerned about paying the electricity bills, their mortgage, about the future of their children and what sort of jobs they would have in a world where AI will present both threats and opportunities.

 

“We were not talking about any of those enough, and instead focused on esoteric issues and I think it indicated a lack of discipline and real focus.”

 

Leeser held his north Sydney seat of Berowra despite a 5.9 per cent swing to Labor. Dutton brought the former lawyer back to his front bench in January as assistant foreign affairs minister after Leeser, who is Jewish, proved a staunch campaigner on antisemitism issues. There is speculation within the Coalition that he could return to the shadow legal affairs portfolio under Opposition Leader Sussan Ley.

 

Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who was the face of the No campaign, is expected to lose her “government efficiency” role in the reshuffle because of its Trumpian overtones, but she may have a different portfolio.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/pro-voice-liberal-says-referendum-defeat-gave-the-party-a-false-sense-of-confidence-20250526-p5m2da.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 27, 2025, 2:08 a.m. No.23087088   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7965 >>2253

>>22968851

AUKUS in space: Scott Morrison proposes ‘Pillar 3’ for defence pact

 

JOE KELLY - 27 May 2025

 

Scott Morrison – the founder of the landmark AUKUS agreement – has proposed taking the security partnership into the space domain to bolster its effectiveness as a military deterrent and make Australia a more valuable ally.

 

The former prime minister said he would support a new AUKUS “Pillar 3” aimed at helping Australia develop a stronger space capability that could complement US, Japanese, as well as European and UK systems.

 

This would bolster deterrence, with Mr Morrison noting that space was “now a frontline in US-China strategic rivalry.” But he also said it would send a valuable signal to the private sector about the important role it had to play.

 

“The blurred lines between civil and military domains created by the dual use space technologies makes this even more challenging to contest,” he said.

 

AUKUS – the trilateral security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US – offered a chance to harness the power of the private sector in the space domain to “deliver strategic advantage over potential adversaries.”

 

In a speech to the 2025 Australian Space Summit in Darling Harbour on Tuesday, Mr Morrison said that “Australia can and must stand out as a rising actor with the potential to plug important holes in allied capabilities.”

 

He warned that China was “advancing, especially in satellite manoeuvrability, launch, and spaceplane tech,” while Russia was “reportedly developing a space-based nuclear anti-satellite weapon.”

 

As space became “more enmeshed in geopolitical rivalry,” Mr Morrison said the allied network needed to function as a “cohesive whole, just as it has in all other domains for decades.”

 

“By 2030, with deliberate development, Australia can offer unique contributions: southern-hemisphere sensors watching the skies, a strategic location for space operations, and additional resilient satellites and launch options,” he said.

 

“An allied operation in the Indo-Pacific in 2030 could count on Australian satellites for communications and surveillance, Australian sensors to warn of enemy ASAT (anti-satellite weapon) moves, and even Australian launch pads to rapidly deploy new assets,” he said.

 

“All of this augments the strengths of the US, Japan, and Europe/UK, creating a more robust collective space posture that deters aggression.”

 

Mr Morrison said that a “strong argument can also be made that such initiatives could form the basis of Australia’s contribution to a new Pillar 3 for AUKUS which, as its founder, I would strongly support.”

 

The AUKUS agreement – unveiled in September 2021 – has two main pillars. The first would help Australia acquire its own fleet of conventionally armed, nuclear powered submarines. The second allows for the development and sharing of highly advanced technologies and capabilities between the UK, the US and Australia.

 

Mr Morrison told The Australian in 2024 that Pillar 2 was the “reason for AUKUS” – to create “a single defence industrial base ecosystem between the three jurisdictions (US, UK and Australia) where there’s less regulation, there’s greater integration, there’s more innovation”.

 

Speaking just weeks after the 2025 election result in Australia, Mr Morrison said on Tuesday that it was important for both sides of politics to “make the strategic case for a bipartisan commitment to space, driven by our national interests – just like intelligence, security and defence.”

 

The former prime minister has a deep interest in turning Australia into a major player in the space domain. He currently serves as the non-executive chairman of Space Centre Australia which is aiming to open a major international space port in Cape York in Northern Queensland.

 

Space Centre Australia recently inked its first agreement with NASA for a “horizontal launch capability” allowing a rocket to be deployed in mid air from a C-130 Hercules military transport plane, delivering a payload into a low Earth orbit.

 

Speaking on Tuesday, Mr Morrison sketched out his vision for “multi user private space port near Weipa,” likening it a “Cape Canaveral at Cape York.”

 

“There is no other space port in a secure jurisdiction planned or existing, at this scale, closer to the equator,” he said.

 

In his address on Tuesday, Mr Morrison said that management consulting firm McKinsey had estimated that the global space economy was now worth US$630bn and would grow 9 per cent annually to US$1.8 trillion by 2035 – “double the growth rate of the global economy and faster than semiconductors.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/aukus-in-space-scomo-proposes-pillar-3-for-defence-pact/news-story/b638b9c9109a3508bb6e81cb63a4371c

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 27, 2025, 2:13 a.m. No.23087093   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7094 >>7100 >>0704 >>0715 >>2271

>>23083159

>>23083164

US eyes Darwin Port prise from Chinese-owned company Landbridge Group

 

BEN PACKHAM - 27 May 2025

 

1/2

 

A US private equity firm with strong ties to the Trump administration is poised to make an offer to buy the Port of Darwin from its Chinese owner, in a test of ­Anthony Albanese’s resolve to bring the port back under ­Western control.

 

The Australian can reveal New York-based Cerberus Capital Management is preparing a formal proposal to buy the port from Landbridge Group’s billionaire owner Ye Cheng, who is a close confidant of senior Chinese ­Communist Party figures.

 

It’s understood the investment firm’s offer will be slightly above the $506m that Landbridge paid 10 years ago for its 99-year lease over the facility. The company says the facility is not for sale, but one source said the port operator was open to offers of about $1bn.

 

The Prime Minister warned in the midst of the election campaign that Landbridge must either sell the port voluntarily or it would be forcibly acquired by the government. The US has had longstanding concerns over the port’s ­Chinese ownership, but Mr Albanese has been facing pressure from Beijing to back down on his pre-election pledge to strip Landbridge of the lease.

 

Cerberus Capital Management was until recently run by co-­founder Steve Feinberg, who was appointed in March to be US deputy defence secretary.

 

Representatives from the company met Landbridge Group and Northern Territory Treasurer Bill Yan last week.

 

Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian said forcing the company to give up the lease would be “ethically questionable” given it had ­secured it through an open and transparent bidding process and made significant investments in the facility since then. “These ­efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development,” the ambassador said in comments posted on the Chinese embassy website.

 

“Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment. It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.”

 

Alluding to the stabilisation of bilateral ties during the Albanese government’s first term, Mr Xiao said the countries were “comprehensive strategic partners” and should foster “mutual trust”.

 

Mr Albanese opted to leave the port under Landbridge’s ownership following an October 2023 review by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet that found there was “a robust ­regulatory system” in place to manage any risks. But, in an election campaign move to gazump a Coalition pledge, the Prime Minister said the government wanted the port to be returned to “Australian hands”.

 

Mr Albanese said the government was looking to find a buyer for the asset, such as an Australian superannuation company. But “if it reaches a point where the commonwealth needs to directly intervene, then we’d be prepared to do that”, he told ABC Darwin.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 27, 2025, 2:15 a.m. No.23087094   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23087093

 

2/2

 

It’s not yet clear how the government will proceed with the plan or when it hopes to finalise the process.

 

While Cerberus Capital Management is American, not Australian as Mr Albanese had hoped, its bid would likely sail through the government’s risk-based foreign investment approvals process if accepted by Landbridge Group.

 

The company’s ties to the Trump administration through Mr Feinberg raise the stakes over the future of the port, given the US military’s strategic interests in Darwin and the wider Top End, and heightened tensions between the White House and Beijing.

 

Former president Barack Obama expressed his displeasure over the port’s Chinese ownership to former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull soon after its sale in 2015, reportedly asking for a “heads-up about these sorts of things” in future.

 

Cerberus Capital Management, which declined to comment on Monday, has about $US60bn worth of assets under management. It purchased The Philippines’ strategically important Agila Subic Shipyard in 2022 amid concerns over a potential takeover by state-run Chinese firms.

 

Landbridge Group non-­executive director Terry O’Connor said the port wasn’t on the market, and the government was yet to approach the company to discuss the facility’s future.

 

“The owner holds the position that he has always held, and that is that the port’s not available for purchase or not available for someone else to take over,” Mr O’Connor said. “That’s his position, and remains his position. If there was an approach, and we did enter into any negotiations, we would be ­obviously doing that through some sort of confidentiality agreement. And none of those exist at this stage.”

 

In its latest available annual report, for the 2023-24 financial year, Landbridge posted a net loss of more than $34m. PricewaterhouseCoopers’ auditors found there was “a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the Landbridge Group Co’s ability to continue as a going concern”.

 

Mr O’Connor said the loss was part of a “financial strategy” and the company was not in difficulty.

 

An Albanese government spokeswoman was unable to provide further details on the government’s approach to securing a buyer for the facility or bringing it under public ownership.

 

“The Port of Darwin is not only a vital part of the region’s economic success, it’s also a critical infrastructure asset of national importance,” she said. “The Australian government is working closely with the Northern Territory government on next steps.”

 

The NT government did not respond to questions.

 

About 2500 US Marine Corps personnel deploy to Darwin for six months each year to train with Australian Defence Force personnel. The territory also hosts US Bombers on rotational deployments, including nuclear-capable B-52s, while a US nuclear-powered submarine stopped in Darwin Harbour this year metres from the Chinese-owned port.

 

The port’s future is likely to be on the agenda at AUSMIN talks, due to be held in Australia in coming months. The port is also likely to be raised during an expected visit by Mr Albanese to China this year for annual leaders’ talks, and could come up when the Prime Minister travels to the US in coming weeks to meet Mr Trump.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/us-eyes-darwin-port-prise-from-chineseowned-company-landbridge-group/news-story/eacabf426b298c1d4d0d12a630d1c765

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 27, 2025, 2:21 a.m. No.23087100   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7102 >>2272

>>23083159

>>23083164

>>23087093

If Australia forcibly takes back Darwin Port, it will leave behind enduring pitfalls: Global Times editorial

 

Global Times - May 27, 2025

 

1/2

 

As a port operation project obtained through a normal market-oriented and transparent bidding process - and one that has undergone at least three political and security reviews over the past decade unjustly - the Darwin Port operated by China's Landbridge Group has repeatedly become a "political football" in Australian domestic politics. Since the current election cycle, it has come under renewed pressure for destroying the contract and forced takeover by the Australian government.

 

On this issue, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian recently stated in an interview with Chinese and Australian media that China has maintained communication with Australian federal and local governments over the Darwin port through diplomatic channels. He also noted that "It's very morally inappropriate to rent out the port when it is in the red and take it back once it is profitable."

 

Over the past 10 years, Darwin Port has seen significant transformation. Beyond mutual business benefits, Landbridge Group's role has been a case of timely assistance to the port and the Northern Territory, especially in a context where the then federal government wasn't "interested in supporting the Northern Territory with this infrastructure." From turning the port's operations from loss to profit and helping ease the Northern Territory government's debt crisis, to investing more than AUD 83 million (about $ 55 million) and upgrading port facilities - which led to a 95.7 percent increase in the total gross tonnage (GRT) of arriving vessels - and greatly contributing to local economic and social development, Landbridge Group's involvement has brought systematic and positive changes to Darwin Port. Former Northern Territory minister John Elferink has said the Commonwealth failed to raise any security concerns when it approved the deal at the time.

 

It is well known that Darwin Port only became linked to so-called "national security" and subjected to a wave of political and security scrutiny after so-called "concerns" were voiced from Washington. However, recent Australian governments' review have all concluded that there were no so-called "national security risks" associated with the port. The latest review in 2023 even found "not necessary" to cancel or alter the lease. However, the recent surge in rhetoric about tearing up the deal - even being framed during the election campaign as a bipartisan "consensus" - clearly shows that the undercurrents of anti-China sentiment in Australia are once again resurfacing.

 

However, should the Australian government take the drastic step of forcibly taking back Darwin Port, it will undoubtedly leave behind three major enduring pitfalls for the country.

 

The operations of Landbridge Group at the Darwin Port are a typical example of Chinese enterprises investing and operating overseas in accordance with laws and regulations. If the Australian government were to unilaterally tear up the agreement without legitimate legal grounds, it would send a dangerous signal to global investors: the Australian government may arbitrarily interfere in commercial contracts for political purposes. Such a practice of "politics taking precedence over the rule of law" would seriously undermine foreign investors' confidence in Australia's business environment, especially in sectors like infrastructure and energy that require long-term investment.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 27, 2025, 2:21 a.m. No.23087102   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23087100

 

2/2

 

Some Australian figures have suggested they would "make sure that there's a good return on investment for the Chinese owners Landbridge." This mindset - "pay some money and breach contracts at will" - only proves that the Australian side is guilty at heart when it comes to the so-called "ending lease contract" issue. How much would it take to buy back the spirit of contract and make up for moral integrity Australia has lost in this incident?

 

In recent years, China-Australia relations have experienced many ups and downs. One of the key reasons is Australia's excessive politicization and abuses of security in dealing with China affairs.

 

Recently, with the efforts of both sides in maintaining a pragmatic and cooperative attitude, the bilateral relationship has generally returned to a stable track. However, if the Darwin Port issue is further politicized, or forcibly taken back under the pretext of so-called "national security," it would become another negative typical case that affects the healthy and stable development of China-Australia relations.

 

This is bound to impact the currently stabilized and improving bilateral relations, intensify the confrontational sentiments among the people of the two countries, and thereby undermine the mutual trust between the governments and enterprises of the two countries.

 

Taking back the Port of Darwin from Landbridge Group would also symbolize a dangerous shift from commercial cooperation to military development. In recent years, the US has frequently escalated its military presence in the Port of Darwin, stationing and rotating Marine units and upgrading and expanding military facilities, in an attempt to turning the region into a strategic frontier of the Indo-Pacific strategy.

 

The move of "de-Sinicization" aims to remove obstacles for the US to advance its militarization in northern Australia. More importantly, once part of, even the whole of the port's commercial functions is repurposed for military use, the local economy will become hostage to military strategy - normal port logistics will give way to military exercises, fleet resupply, and strategic stockpiling. This will hinder the development of local livelihood and industries and significantly reduce residents' sense of security.

 

The operation of Darwin Port is, at its core, a market-driven economic project and should operate within the framework of the rule of law and market principles.

 

However, when pressure from Washington overrides Australia's own national interests, and rule-based commercial activities are trampled by political logic, what suffers is not only Australia's international credibility, but also the fragile foundation of mutual trust and its own strategic autonomy - a space that could have been preserved from external military rivalry. We urge the Australian government to prioritize the broader picture, uphold the spirit of contract, return to the rule of law, and stop distorting economic cooperation with political bias.

 

Whether the Port of Darwin becomes a hub of prosperous trade or the eye of a geopolitical storm is not a difficult choice, but it does test Canberra's strategic wisdom.

 

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202505/1334889.shtml

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 28, 2025, 3 a.m. No.23090691   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0698 >>2201

>>23058406

>>23067420

>>23072269

Coalition gets back together after week-long split

 

Jake Evans - 28 May 2025

 

The Liberal and National parties have struck a deal to reunify, a week after the Coalition's extraordinary split in the wake of a ruinous election defeat.

 

The ABC has been told a press conference will be held later today, and that frontbench positions are being allocated.

 

Nationals Leader David Littleproud announced last Tuesday that his party would be ending the Coalition Agreement with the Liberals over four policy issues the party demanded be kept.

 

Days later, the Liberal Party agreed in principle not to include those policies — nuclear power, a Regional Australia Future Fund, break-up powers for the supermarket sector and better mobile coverage in the bush — in a sweeping review of the Coalition's election loss.

 

Some senior Liberals told the ABC that the Coalition split could give the party "breathing space" on its policy, with a view the Liberal brand had been damaged in the cities.

 

The Liberal Party has lost as many as 13 seats at an election where it had expected to gain seats.

 

Reunification draws line under days of infighting

 

The split has led to days of infighting and jostling between the parties.

 

In contention was also a claim that Mr Littleproud demanded the Nationals be free to breach cabinet solidarity and be allowed to speak out against policies they disagreed with, which Ms Ley flatly refused.

 

The opposition leader initially did not want to rule out any policies from a total review of the Coalition's election loss.

 

But Mr Littleproud said his party would not "blink" on its four policy demands, and repeated over the weekend that he was proud to stand up for Nationals principles and deliver the message to Ms Ley that his party had voted to leave.

 

The Liberals and Nationals will not pursue their election commitment to build seven nuclear power plants, but will continue to push to lift the national ban on nuclear power.

 

The parties have also negotiated a position on three other election commitments: to introduce divestiture powers that could be used to break up supermarket and hardware store chains found to be abusing their market power, a $20 billion future fund that could be drawn down on to pay for regional services and infrastructure, and minimum broadband speeds of at least 25Mbs and basic mobile service requirements for regional and rural Australia.

 

Internally, however, leadership questions have roiled within the Nationals, with the party leader openly saying on Sunday that if the cost of taking a stand would be that he lost his job, so be it.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-28/coalition-gets-back-together-after-week-long-split/105346446

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 28, 2025, 3:06 a.m. No.23090698   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2201

>>23090691

Jane Hume dumped, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price demoted in Sussan Ley’s new shadow cabinet

 

SARAH ISON - 28 May 2025

 

Sussan Ley has dumped work-from-the-office policy architect Jane Hume from shadow cabinet and demoted conservative stalwart Jacinta Nampijinpa Price in a major refresh of her depleted Coalition team.

 

After repairing the Coalition deal following a week of chaos on Wednesday, the Opposition Leader and Nationals leader David Littleproud announced a new opposition frontbench in Canberra.

 

Senator Hume was the highest-profile casualty of the shuffle, losing a position on the frontbench altogether.

 

The Victorian had suffered significant backlash within Coalition ranks after her push to get public servants to stop working from home was successfully weaponised by Labor, and her comments claiming “Chinese spies” could be working on polling booths went viral.

 

After Senator Hume supported Angus Taylor in the Liberal leadership ballot, Ms Ley claimed she had a big future ahead of her, despite having just removed her entirely from the frontbench.

 

“These are tough days, and having been through many days like this myself in my parliamentary career, I recognise that,” Ms Ley said in Canberra.

 

“But what I want to say about Jane Hume is she is an enormously talented, fantastic member of this team, who has contributed amazingly over her political career, will continue to do so and is a strong performer across a range of different subject areas.”

 

Senator Price, who abandoned the Nationals for the Liberals in a failed run for the latter’s deputy leadership, has been pushed to the outer shadow ministry and will be the spokeswoman for defence personnel.

 

Top roles in Ms Ley’s new shadow cabinet include deputy Liberal leader Ted O’Brien as treasury spokesman, Angus Taylor taking on Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles in defence, James Paterson going to finance, and Michaelia Cash taking on foreign affairs.

 

Berowra MP Julian Leeser returns to shadow cabinet as opposition attorney-general spokesman, after leaving Peter Dutton’s frontbench over his support for the Indigenous voice to parliament referendum.

 

Ms Ley’s numbers man Alex Hawke was rewarded with the industry portfolio.

 

Senator Claire Chandler and Senator Sarah Henderson have been dumped from shadow cabinet, too.

 

The Liberals and the Nationals reformed the Coalition just days after a brief split, after Mr Littleproud got approval from his party on Wednesday morning on the revised set of policies he made conditions on rejoining with the Liberals.

 

The Australian understands the revisions included caveats, such as an assurance that the $20bn regional investment would be distributed equitably and that Ms Ley and Mr Littleproud also discussed smaller administrative details of the deal.

 

The Nationals leader convened his colleagues on Wednesday morning for a virtual meeting on Ms Ley’s revisions and a final tick-off on the Coalition agreement.

 

After the meeting, Mr Littleproud contacted Ms Ley to confirm the agreement could be formally made and shadow ministers announced.

 

Many Nationals MPs have expressed disquiet over the way the negotiations were handled, with former Nationals leader Barnaby Joyce declaring the saga had been “a shocker”, while Colin Boyce said Mr Littleproud had misled partyroom.

 

“How can you support a bloke that misleads the partyroom? I’m calling him out,” Mr Boyce told Sky News. “I can’t do it. You take these four policies that David took to the first meeting with Sussan Ley, again, none of that has come through the partyroom. It wasn’t discussed.”

 

Mr Boyce was one of a number of MPs who told The Australian Mr Littleproud should have gone to partyroom before calling a meeting with Ms Ley, during which he put the need for policies to be committed to by the Liberals and shadow cabinet solidarity to be revised.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/coalition-back-together-after-nats-tick-off-on-liberals-revisions-to-their-policy-demands/news-story/8e6a15861165fe19088ee611407695e7

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 28, 2025, 3:11 a.m. No.23090699   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2204

Tesla wins council approval for new factory in South Australia despite vocal anti-Musk sentiment

 

Marion council votes to seek state government approval for battery factory in Adelaide despite hundreds of submissions opposing it

 

Tory Shepherd - 28 May 2025

 

Elon Musk’s Tesla is one step closer to opening a factory in Adelaide despite overwhelming community opposition expressing “anti-Tesla and anti-Elon Musk sentiment”.

 

On Tuesday night the City of Marion council voted to seek state government approval to sell the site to a developer who will build a battery-repurposing factory, a showroom and servicing facilities.

 

Environmental concerns and worries the site will draw protesters were cited by those opposed to the plan. Ninety-five per cent of submissions called for the application to be rejected.

 

Many voiced their opposition with words that were censored in the city’s official records, such as “Elon Musk and Tesla are a [redacted] on humanity”.

 

Tesla sales have slumped amid a backlash against Musk for his work for the Trump administration, including slashing funding for government departments through his “department of government efficiency”, as well as his ideology and actions including what some saw as an apparent fascist salute.

 

But Marion’s mayor, Kris Hanna, said blocking the sale of the site would have no impact on Musk and would have cost 100 local jobs.

 

Hanna said the site’s soil was contaminated and not safe for recreation, so “it makes sense to have it sealed over with a renewable technology facility”.

 

“If we didn’t proceed, it would have cost 100 jobs to local residents but it would have had no impact on Elon Musk,” he said. “Tesla would almost certainly find somewhere else in Australia to build their factory.”

 

The factory is to be used to recover and recycle Tesla lithium-ion batteries.

 

Sarah Luscombe, a Marion councillor who was opposed to the plan because of the threat to trees, as well as the community opposition, said while much of the focus had been on battery recycling, the benefits offered by the factory would be limited.

 

“My understanding is Tesla only recycle Tesla batteries and we know most people in SA … have another brand,” she said.

 

Hanna told ABC radio on Wednesday morning that the council voted eight to three to remove the site’s community land status, saying it had not been used since 2016. The reserve is a small part of a larger area that the developer wants to use for a Tesla factory.

 

He said the community opposition had been taken into account and “balanced against the economic factors”.

 

There were “certainly valid points of view … passionately held”, he said, but the “heart” was saying it didn’t want to deal with Musk while the “head” was saying it would be good for the community.

 

Hanna said while there was “significant” anti-Elon Musk sentiment, trees were another key issue. Tesla had now recognised that concern, he said, and had committed to replacing more trees than it would be required to, as well as keeping at least three of four significant trees on the site.

 

“Council has done what it can,” he said. “We’ll leave it up to the state government.”

 

This week Peter Malinauskas said Tesla was welcome in South Australia, according to the Advertiser.

 

“Any time we see any big, major industrial investment in our state, in my view, it is welcome,” the premier said. “Mr Musk’s politics, while I violently disagree with them … that’s his prerogative.”

 

A state government spokesperson said the proposal would be considered by the local government minister. “The state government welcomes investment and job creation in South Australia,” the spokesperson said.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/may/28/tesla-factory-marion-council-south-australia-adelaide-elon-musk

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 28, 2025, 3:19 a.m. No.23090704   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0715 >>2272

>>23083159

>>23087093

Toll, super funds join suitors for Chinese-owned Darwin Port

 

Andrew Tillett - May 27, 2025

 

Logistics powerhouse Toll is part of a US private equity fund’s bid to buy out the Chinese owner of the Port of Darwin, offering an Australian flavour to a transaction being driven by national security imperatives that superannuation funds are also weighing up.

 

The partnership by Toll and Cerberus Capital Management is just one potential suitor for the port, which is effectively on the market after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged during the election campaign to terminate Chinese company Landbridge’s 99-year lease on the key cargo gateway for northern Australia.

 

Superannuation funds are also running the rule over the port, sources familiar with the matter told The Australian Financial Review, after Albanese indicated he wanted them at the bidding table.

 

Albanese’s promise to take the lease out of Landbridge’s hands is poised to revive diplomatic strains with Beijing after Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian warned it was ethically questionable and the company should not be punished.

 

Two sources, granted anonymity to speak on sensitive matters, said Cerberus had partnered with Toll to take over the port and had already met with the Northern Territory government and political figures, as well as Landbridge representatives, as part of its pitch.

 

Cerberus’ interest was first reported by The Australian newspaper.

 

Cerberus’ local representative declined to comment on its interest or confirm Toll’s involvement, citing commercial confidentiality. Toll did not respond to a request for comment.

 

One of Australia’s major superannuation-backed asset managers, IFM Investors, also declined to comment on whether it was a prospective buyer.

 

While Cerberus has links to the Trump administration through its co-founder Steve Feinberg, who was appointed to be deputy US defence secretary, the bid appears to have come independently of the US government.

 

Former president Barack Obama directly chided then prime minister Malcolm Turnbull in 2015 that the US had not been kept in the loop over the transaction.

 

While several reviews have concluded there was no security risk justifying stripping Landbridge’s lease, security sensitivities over the port are high given thousands of US Marines are deployed to Darwin each year and Landbridge has been linked to the Chinese Communist Party and People’s Liberation Army.

 

Albanese and former opposition leader Peter Dutton both announced during the election campaign they would take the lease off Landbridge.

 

However, details of how that will occur remain vague. One source said the federal government had not approached potential buyers. Nor has it spoken to Landbridge about ending its lease.

 

Landbridge insists it is not interested in selling the port after paying $506 million to the Northern Territory government in 2015 for the 99-year lease.

 

Sources were split on how the final transaction could work. One industry player said a commercial outcome was going to have to be reached because Landbridge was complying with its lease requirements.

 

Another source said in the light of Landbridge’s determination not to sell the lease, the government would have to use its powers to forcibly acquire the port, and may have to financially support the transaction for the new buyer.

 

Meanwhile, a new report by the Lowy Institute foreign policy think tank highlights that many of the world’s poorest nations face record high debt repayments to China for infrastructure projects funded by President Xi Jinping’s signature Belt and Road Initiative.

 

China’s practice of “debt trap diplomacy” has been criticised by Australian and US governments and the institute found debt-servicing flows to China from developing countries will hit $US35 billion ($54 billion) in 2025.

 

“Now, and for the rest of this decade, China will be more debt collector than banker to the developing world,” research fellow Riley Duke said.

 

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/toll-super-funds-join-suitors-for-chinese-owned-darwin-port-20250527-p5m2jc

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 28, 2025, 3:27 a.m. No.23090715   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0720 >>2275

>>23083159

>>23087093

>>23090704

‘We want it in Australian hands’: Albanese cool on US bid to buy Darwin Port

 

Matthew Knott - May 28, 2025

 

1/2

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has insisted he wants the Port of Darwin returned to Australian ownership, as an American private equity firm makes a play to buy the strategically significant asset from its Chinese owners.

 

Both Labor and the Coalition announced during the election campaign that they would move to strip Chinese firm Landbridge of its controversial 99-year lease of the port, which sits directly opposite Darwin’s Larrakeyah Defence Precinct.

 

The prospect of a forced divestiture has angered Beijing, which feels Chinese companies are being unfairly singled out for punishment over national security concerns.

 

Albanese also downplayed the prospect of joining any international effort to impose sanctions on leading Israeli politicians over the war in Gaza and settlement building in the occupied West Bank, despite a call from Labor elder statesman Gareth Evans to sanction Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and two of his far-right cabinet members.

 

Asked if he would support a bid by US investment firm Cerberus to buy the port, Albanese told reporters: “We’ve said we want to see it in Australian hands. I notice this speculation which is there, but we’ll examine the process. We’re determined to make sure it’s in the national interest for it to be in Australian hands.”

 

He left some wriggle room on overseas offers, saying: “But if there are other proposals, we’ll work those through. But we’ll work those through on a commercial basis.”

 

Labor has been keen for Australian superannuation firms to investigate taking control of the port.

 

During a visit to Darwin last week, Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian said Landbridge should not be forced to end its lease of the port.

 

“Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment,” Xiao said. “It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.

 

“China and Australia are comprehensive strategic partners. The two sides should foster mutual trust, as mutually beneficial co-operation aligns with our shared interests.”

 

Landbridge, which secured its long-term lease of the port in 2015 for $506 million, has insisted that the port is not for sale and that it has no intention of ending its lease.

 

“Landbridge has not yet received any offers or engagement from the government at any level,” non-executive director Terry O’Connor said.

 

“It is business as usual at Darwin Port, as we continue to focus on the growth of our operations.”

 

Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy struck a similar tone to Albanese’s when asked whether the government would support US ownership of the port.

 

“We’ve been very clear that we want to see the port back in Australian hands,” he said.

 

“We’re going through the process now of looking through all the options, but our commitment is, at the end of the process, the Port of Darwin will be in Australian hands.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 28, 2025, 3:28 a.m. No.23090720   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23090715

 

2/2

 

The Australian Financial Review reported that Australian freight company Toll had partnered with Cerberus on the bid in a move that could help ease concerns about foreign ownership of the port, even by a trusted ally such as the US.

 

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute has detailed extensive connections between Landbridge, the Chinese Communist Party and the People’s Liberation Army, raising concerns about the national security implications of the leasing agreement from both Coalition and Labor MPs.

 

Asked whether Australia could join countries such as Canada, the United Kingdom and France in imposing further sanctions on Israel, Albanese said: “No, we follow our own path and Australia determines our own foreign policy. And we’ve been very consistent the whole way through. And what people don’t say when they put forward ideas like this is what that means.”

 

The government last year imposed sanctions on seven Israeli settlers and a hardline settler group known for setting up new illegal outposts.

 

Evans, who served as foreign minister from 1988 to 1996, told this masthead that imposing “financial sanctions, travel bans and the like on the most egregious Israeli promoters and perpetrators of violations of Palestinian human rights” would send an important message to Israel.

 

He also urged the government to use a major international conference in New York next month to recognise a Palestinian state.

 

“Recognition is ALP policy, and [Foreign Minister] Penny Wong and her colleagues have been wrestling only with the timing – and the timing now is absolutely right,” Evans said.

 

The Australian Centre for International Justice has made a detailed submission to the government calling for Australia to sanction Israeli Finance Minister Belazel Smotrich and National Security Minister Itama Ben-Gvir over patterns of conduct they allege constitute “incitement to violence, complicity in serious human rights violations, and responsibility for policies that have exacerbated settler violence and resulted in the displacement, dispossession and death of Palestinian civilians”.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/we-want-it-in-australian-hands-albanese-cool-on-us-bid-to-buy-darwin-port-20250528-p5m2x2.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 28, 2025, 3:49 a.m. No.23090760   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Darwin man, 68, allegedly livestreamed horrific acts of child sexual abuse

 

A Darwin man who allegedly exploited six children as young as six in the Philippines, livestreaming horrific acts of sexual abuse, was found out during an airport baggage examination.

 

Nathaniel Chambers and Harry Brill - May 28, 2025

 

A Darwin man has faced court after allegedly exploiting six children in the Philippines by livestreaming sexual abuse online.

 

The 68-year-old man appeared in Darwin Local Court charged with allegedly directing the sexual abuse of young children, as he watched the crimes live on video from another location.

 

NT JACET, comprising members of Australian Federal Police and Northern Territory Police, started an investigation after Australian Border Force officers allegedly found child abuse material on his phone.

 

He had been selected for a bag check on his arrival in Darwin on New Year’s Day when his phone was checked as part of the search.

 

Police later found explicit videos and images of children, as well as video calls from the man to facilitators in the Philippines instructing them to livestream sexual abuse of children as young as six.

 

Investigators executed a search warrant on January 3 at Dinah Beach where the man had been living in a vehicle and yacht and made the arrest.

 

He first appeared in court on January 7 and was remanded in custody to reappear on May 27.

 

NT JACET provided information to AFP members in Manila, which led to an investigation by Philippines National Police (PNP).

 

Philippines authorities arrested two Philippine nationals and removed six children from harm in April.

 

The Darwin man has been charged with two counts of sexual intercourse with a child outside Australia, two counts of sexual activity with a child outside Australia and one count of possessing child abuse material.

 

The defendant did not appear and was represented by his lawyer.

 

The prosecution requested an adjournment as they needed to obtain “outstanding material” which would be presented to the court.

 

The matter was adjourned to June 24 for a preliminary examination.

 

AFP Superintendent Greg Davis said AFP said the protection of children is one of the AFP’s highest priorities.

 

“All victims of child sexual exploitation experience lifelong harm because of the selfish actions of their abusers,” Supt Davis said.

 

“The AFP will continue to work closely with local, Commonwealth and international partners to protect children from sickening abuse, and together identify offenders and bring them before the courts.”

 

Philippine National Police Brigadier General Portia B Manalad said PNP and the AFP continued to collaborate on child exploitation cases to achieve results such as this.

 

“The PNP Women and Children Protection Centre will continue to locate alleged offenders and rescue victims with the assistance of our foreign partners,” Brigadier General Manalad said.

 

NT Police Senior Sergeant Toby Wilson said the possession and distribution of child abuse material caused immeasurable harm to vulnerable children.

 

“Our team remains committed to pursuing offenders relentlessly and protecting the community against child exploitation,” he said.

 

ABF Commander Tracie Griffin said the arrest was a reminder that the vigilance of ABF officers at Australia’s border was absolutely critical in protecting the most vulnerable.

 

“I want to commend the work of the ABF officers involved in the alleged discovery of child abuse material on this man’s phone,” Commander Griffin said.

 

“Six children are safe because of their diligence and the work of our domestic and international law enforcement partners.”

 

https://www.ntnews.com.au/truecrimeaustralia/police-courts-nt/courts-darwin-man-68-allegedly-livestreamed-horrific-acts-of-child-sexual-abuse/news-story/78d289528a7135bd715140f1f97d09f3

 

https://www.afp.gov.au/news-centre/media-release/six-children-removed-harm-philippines-after-darwin-man-charged-alleged

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 29, 2025, 2:26 a.m. No.23094549   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9131 >>8072 >>2147

>>23058421

>>23083142

Israel’s president Isaac Herzog invites Anthony Albanese to Jewish State after Gaza claims

 

PAUL KELLY - 29 May 2025

 

In an effort to preserve relations with Australia, the President of Israel, Isaac Herzog, told an Australian media delegation visiting Jerusalem that he wanted Anthony Albanese to visit Israel to engage first-hand with the problems of the region.

 

The explicit request from President Herzog – well informed on Australian politics – directly challenges the Albanese Government where distaste for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is visceral, with Labor’s preference being to keep its distance from Israel’s executive leader and driver of its Gaza war strategy.

 

The deterioration in Australia-Israel ties is deepening with the Prime Minister’s attack on Israel earlier this week over humanitarian aid saying “Israel’s actions are completely unacceptable,” branding its behaviour “outrageous “and saying that Australia had aligned with other nations in expressing its opposition.

 

In remarks to Australian editors and journalists, President Herzog made clear he would like to see Mr Albanese involved more directly – a sentiment that reflects the ingrained Israeli view that Australia has become both a remote and poorly informed critic of Israel’s Gaza strategy.

 

“I welcome and invite the Prime Minister to visit Israel – absolutely,” President Herzog told the delegation. At the same time the president made clear his willingness to visit Australia as well. This follows a brief exchange between the president and PM in Rome for the recent inauguration of the new Pope, Leo X1V.

 

Albanese has said he made it “very clear” to President Herzog in their Rome meeting that Israel’s failures on humanitarian aid to Gaza were “completely untenable and without credibility” since people were starving and “the idea that a democratic state withholds supply is an outrage.”

 

Australia’s position has been to call for a ceasefire, oppose Hamas as a terrorist group having any future role in Gaza, the immediate release of hostages and the provision of humanitarian aid. Albanese has said Australia’s criticism of Israel has been conveyed to its government both privately and publicly.

 

But Western criticism of Israel continues to mount with calls for recognition of a Palestinian state and sanctions against Israel. Such action would have virtually no impact on the ground but would have political significance – it would be seen as a diplomatic blow for Israel, a reward for Hamas and a further sinking of hopes for a two-state solution.

 

The Australian delegation that also includes former Treasurer and deputy Liberal leader, Josh Frydenberg, has been left in no doubt in its briefings in Jerusalem that relations have sunk to a low ebb, that Australia is seen as letting Israel down in its decisive moment of need and has misunderstood the nature of the current war.

 

Given the International Criminal Court finding against prime minister Netanyahu there is no prospect he will visit Australia at any point. A visit by the President of Israel, a non-executive office, would become an important statement and a contentious event – one Labor is unlikely to embrace.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/israels-president-isaac-herzog-invites-anthony-albanese-to-jewish-state-after-gaza-claims/news-story/a3e1e90b5043b5555193df84ceda8730

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 29, 2025, 2:53 a.m. No.23094566   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4568 >>5045 >>4162 >>9588 >>8467 >>2275

>>23032055

>>22998144

Pacific Island nations support China's Taiwan claims at high-profile foreign ministers' meeting

 

Stephen Dziedzic - 29 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Pacific nations have backed China's claim over Taiwan during a high-profile meeting, but have shied away from directly endorsing Beijing's push to "reunify" the democratically ruled island with the mainland.

 

China has also taken a shot at the United States over climate policy, promising to work with the region to combat climate shocks despite the Trump administration's decision to abandon the Paris Agreement.

 

China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi yesterday sat down with foreign ministers from eight Pacific nations — along with senior officials from three others — in the southern city of Xiamen.

 

It's the third time China has held a meeting with Pacific foreign ministers, but it's the first time the event has been held in person rather than online, and Beijing has trumpeted the gathering as a major milestone.

 

China has long been pushing to expand its influence throughout the region, and analysts say the Trump administration's sweeping global tariffs and aid cuts will open up more opportunities for it.

 

Beijing has also been intent on building global support for its increasingly forceful stance on Taiwan, which it has pledged to bring under its control.

 

A joint statement issued after the meeting declared that all the Pacific nations "recognise that there is but one China in the world, that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory, and that the government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of China".

 

But the statement doesn't explicitly and directly endorse the Chinese government's push to take Taiwan, as Pacific nations like Solomon Islands and Kiribati did last year.

 

It uses slightly softer language instead, reiterating China's determination to "realising national reunification" and saying this commitment "gained wide understanding and support at the meeting".

 

Dr Anna Powles from Massey University said Beijing would have been hoping for clearer backing on Taiwan at the meeting.

 

"Unlike previous years, the statement devotes considerable attention to the Taiwan issue including more forceful language on national reunification," she said.

 

"That said, the Pacific Island nations' position is ambiguous with reference to 'understanding and support' falling short of an endorsement of reunification which would have been Beijing's objective."

 

The three Pacific nations which still recognise Taiwan rather than Beijing — namely Palau, Tuvalu and the Republic of Marshall Islands — weren't at the gathering.

 

The joint statement also doesn't directly endorse China's efforts to expand security and policing cooperation with Pacific Island nations, although Beijing pledged in a separate outcomes document to hold another dialogue on police training with the Pacific before the end of the year.

 

Dr Powles said that China "continues to present itself as an alternative security and policing partner to Pacific Island countries".

 

"However it is less clear how widespread support is amongst Pacific countries with the exception of Solomon Islands and Kiribati," she said.

 

"Three ministerial dialogues on policing and law enforcement have already been held without substantive region-wide outcomes so far."

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 29, 2025, 2:55 a.m. No.23094568   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23094566

 

2/2

 

China promises to support Pacific disaster response, infrastructure

 

China has also promised to establish a new "mechanism" to help with disaster management in the region, and to deliver 100 "small but beautiful" projects across the region over the next three years — using a term which has been adopted as a guiding principle under Beijing's global "Belt and Road" infrastructure program.

 

Separately it said it would make a modest $2 million investment in sectors like clean energy, fisheries and tourism across the Pacific.

 

"China fully recognises the vulnerability of the economic and social development of the Pacific Island countries in the face of the climate change crisis," the Foreign Ministry said.

 

Wang Yi also took a thinly veiled swipe at the Trump administration for ditching its global climate commitments.

 

"We deeply regret that a certain major country has withdrawn from the Paris Agreement," he said, according to state media.

 

"However, regardless of how the situation changes, China's resolve to support and participate in global climate governance will not waver, nor will our commitment to implementing South-South cooperation on climate change."

 

Dr Powles said US retrenchment on climate under Trump "gives China the opportunity to wedge" the US in the region, but "whether this carries currency and advantage with Pacific countries is less clear".

 

Some Pacific countries have already criticised the Trump administration's 'Liberation Day tariffs', warning they will undermine US credibility and sap goodwill towards Washington.

 

In a separate meeting Solomon Islands Foreign Minister Peter Shanel told Wang Yi that his country would "continue to stand firmly with China and jointly oppose unilateralism and protectionism by the United States", according to a readout from China's Foreign Ministry.

 

But there were no direct criticisms of the US in the readouts of bilateral meetings which Wang Yi also had with the foreign ministers from Cook Islands, Tonga and Kiribati on Wednesday.

 

Wang Yi is expected to hold standalone meetings with other Pacific foreign ministers later today.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-05-29/china-wang-yi-pacific-islands-meeting-climate-taiwan/105353012

 

https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/wjbzhd/202505/t20250528_11635595.html

 

https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/wjbzhd/202505/t20250528_11635736.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 29, 2025, 3 a.m. No.23094571   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4573 >>3541 >>6961 >>0675 >>4204 >>4780 >>2204

>>22973535

Australia will keep pushing US to drop Trump tariffs after court ruling, trade minister says

 

Don Farrell says the government has been consistent in its view that tariffs on Australian imports to the US are unjustified

 

Ben Doherty and Josh Butler - 29 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Australia will continue to push Donald Trump to abandon his administration’s tariff regime entirely, after a US court blocked the president’s “liberation day” tariffs from coming into effect.

 

The Manhattan-based court of international trade said the US constitution gives the Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other countries, and ruled that power was not superseded by the president’s self-declared “emergency” he cited to safeguard the US economy.

 

The Trump White House filed an appeal against the judgment minutes after it was handed down. The regime imposed a 10% across-the-board tariff on all Australian imports to the US. Several specific products, including steel and aluminium, are subject to higher tariff rates, up to 25%, which are not impacted by the court’s ruling.

 

The Australian trade minister, Don Farrell, said the Australian government would agitate for tariffs on Australian goods to be dumped entirely.

 

“We will study this ruling of the US Federal Courts on reciprocal tariffs closely and note that they may be subject to further legal processes through the courts,” he said.

 

“The Albanese Government has been consistent in the view that these tariffs on Australian imports into the US are unjustified,” Farrell said.

 

“We will continue to engage and strongly advocate for the removal of tariffs.”

 

“The Albanese Government will always stand up for Australia’s national interests, including Australian jobs and Australian industries.”

 

The US court found Trump overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board tariffs on imports from countries all over the world. Trump called the tariffs, announced on 2 April, America’s “liberation day”.

 

“The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the President’s use of tariffs as leverage. That use is impermissible not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because (federal law) does not allow it,” a three-judge panel said in the decision.

 

The ruling came in a pair of lawsuits, one filed by the nonpartisan Liberty Justice Center on behalf of five small US businesses that import goods from countries targeted by the duties and the other by 13 US states.

 

The companies – which range from a New York wine and spirits importer to a Virginia-based maker of educational kits and musical instruments – have said the tariffs will hurt their ability to do business.

 

The lawsuit argued that the statue invoked by the president – the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) – does not give him the authority to unilaterally issue across-the-board worldwide tariffs.

 

“His claimed emergency is a figment of his own imagination: trade deficits, which have persisted for decades without causing economic harm, are not an emergency. Nor do these trade deficits constitute an ‘unusual and extraordinary threat’,” it argued.

 

Court documents specifically cited the tariffs imposed on Australian territories where there are no people, and, hence, no commerce.

 

“The Liberation Day Order imposed sweeping new tariffs at rates not seen since the Great Depression – including a global 10% tariffs on nearly all countries in the world – regardless of whether they impose tariffs on United States products, the rates at which they do so, or the existence of any trade agreements governing the relationship.

 

“These tariffs even applied to places with no civilian population or international trade activity, such as [Australian territories] the Heard and McDonald Islands, which are inhabited only by penguins and seals.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 29, 2025, 3:01 a.m. No.23094573   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23094571

 

2/2

 

Australian financial analysts have warned that significant uncertainty remained around the ultimate fate of Trump’s tariff regime.

 

Kyle Rodda, a senior financial market analyst with Capital.com in Melbourne, said the court’s ruling was massive news.

 

“It’s long been suggested that the emergency powers Trump has used to implement tariffs were unconstitutional and that the power to enact tariffs sits with Congress,” he said.

 

“It sets up a battle that will likely end up in the supreme court now. It’s a situation fraught with danger because the administration may ignore the court’s ruling, potentially placing greater strain on US institutions at a time of increased stress.”

 

Sean Callow, a senior analyst at ITC Markets in Sydney, said while there must be significant caution over the ruling being overturned by higher courts, “for now the weight of money is being placed on the possibility that US courts prevent the White House from self-imposed economic damage, brightening US growth prospects and the US dollar”.

 

The White House and lawyers for groups that sued did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

 

Stephen Miller, a White House deputy chief of staff and one of Trump’s lead policy advisers, rebuked the court in a brief social media post, writing: “The judicial coup is out of control.”

 

At least five other legal challenges to the tariffs are pending.

 

The attorney general of Oregon, Dan Rayfield, a Democrat whose office is leading the states’ lawsuit, called Trump’s tariffs unlawful, reckless and economically devastating.

 

“This ruling reaffirms that our laws matter, and that trade decisions can’t be made on the president’s whim,” Rayfield said in a statement.

 

Under US law, tariffs must typically be approved by Congress. Trump has claimed broad authority to set tariffs under IEEPA, which is meant to address “unusual and extraordinary” threats during a national emergency.

 

The law has historically been used to impose sanctions on enemies of the US or freeze their assets. Trump is the first US president to use it to impose tariffs.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/may/29/australia-will-keep-pushing-us-to-drop-trump-tariffs-after-court-ruling-trade-minister-says

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 29, 2025, 3:12 a.m. No.23094582   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4583 >>2205

>>23072429

Kevin Rudd says Australia can solve US critical minerals dilemma

 

JOE KELLY - 29 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Kevin Rudd says a draft accord proposed by Australia and presented to the Trump administration would allow the US to effectively become self-reliant in critical minerals, bolstering American economic resilience against China and strengthening ties between Canberra and Washington.

 

Speaking at the Mackinac Policy Conference in Detroit, Dr Rudd said there were opportunities to enhance collaboration with America in the areas of critical minerals and by tapping the power of Australian superannuation funds for US-based investments – including in Michigan.

 

The Australian ambassador also identified a key challenge for democracies in an era of growing political polarisation – the prevention of social disruption which threatened to break the “democratic contract between government and the governed”. A failure on this score would lead people to “look for alternatives”, he said.

 

Speaking in conversation with Sandy Baruah, the chief executive of the Detroit Regional Chamber, Dr Rudd warned that China was seeking to entrench its dominance “across the 50 categories of critical minerals” designated by the US government.

 

“The President of the United States has said this is a strategic priority. We agree with him,” he said. “The geology of the United States does not permit you to be self-reliant in all 50 because they’re not all here. But if you add Canada and Australia, you are.

 

“So what we need to work out – and we have a draft accord with the administration at present on these questions – is how do we collaborate both on the mining, the extraction, the transportation and the processing and the stockpiling to make our economies resilient, including what you’ll need for future battery manufacture for the future.”

 

He also said Australian superannuation savings were valued at $3 trillion in US dollars – “larger than the sovereign funds of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates and Qatar combined”.

 

“Our funds cannot invest all those funds within Australia,” he said. “So, increasingly, they are diversifying offshore. Increasingly, they are coming here and they are investing in big long-scale, long-term infrastructure projects in various states in the United States.”

 

Despite a period of change in the US under Donald Trump, Dr Rudd said Australia’s alliance with Washington had endured over the terms of 15 US presidents and 15 Australian prime ministers. This was because it was anchored in “common interests and common values”.

 

He said it was strengthened by strong institutions, including the ANZUS treaty, the AUKUS trilateral security partnership, the Five Eyes intelligence sharing network, the Quadrilateral security dialogue and – despite a few “recent bumps in the road” – the US/Australia free trade agreement.

 

“Sure, President Trump’s administration has different priorities. But I printed the embassy mugs. On the outside it says, ‘Keep calm, we’re Australian,’” he joked. “And we’ll work our way through all of these little challenges.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 29, 2025, 3:13 a.m. No.23094583   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23094582

 

2/2

 

Dr Rudd said Australians had seen the first Trump administration, the election of Joe Biden, and now the return of President Trump, but were used to an aggressive style of politics.

 

“I think the view down under is that this is a very big country,” Dr Rudd said. “It has as dynamic a democracy as ours. And we have a pretty robust democracy ourselves. It’s take-no-prisoners, slug-and-punch sort of stuff. We’re not a bunch of innately conciliatory Europeans who have a committee to solve most problems. We’re sort of more into the biff.

 

“So when we see this happening here we go, ‘Oh, that’s interesting.’ But we see a lot of resonances with the way in which we conduct our politics down under.”

 

Dr Rudd said that around the world there was an emerging question over political, social and economic polarisation. He said those in the “global political centre” needed to be deeply attentive to the disruption within democracies arising from growing polarisation.

 

He said this was important to “make sure of one thing” – that everyone had an ongoing “physical and emotional stake in the continuation of the democratic contract between government and the governed. Otherwise people peel off. And they look for alternatives.”

 

Dr Rudd also warned that China, under Xi Jinping, was aiming to achieve a profound geopolitical transformation by rising to become the world’s largest military force and economic power. He said this set up a contest with the US, but there was also a contest over the “unfolding technology revolution” over artificial intelligence and the “never to be silenced challenge of climate change”.

 

Dr Rudd said China was the “macro challenge” and that President Xi wanted to take Taiwan and displace the US as the world’s superpower.

 

He said there were a couple of key responses, of which the first pillar was deterrence. Dr Rudd said this meant directing efforts to deter the Chinese from using “unilateral military force to change the map in the Indo-Pacific, of which Taiwan is the central piece.”

 

“That is an ongoing challenge for your military, for the Taiwanese, for your allies in Japan and in Australia,” he said. “But I’m here to report that since 1949 we’ve all succeeded. It’s been contained. It’s actually a successful exercise in integrated deterrence.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/rudd-says-australia-can-solve-us-critical-minerals-dilemma/news-story/ec524a66677f109863291b7fac7d06af

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj9-0C_948Y

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 29, 2025, 3:18 a.m. No.23094587   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2786 >>2205

>>23041388

>>23067527

War crimes investigator launches raids in major escalation

 

Chris Masters and Nick McKenzie - May 29, 2025

 

The elite anti-war crimes agency probing the involvement of ex-SAS soldiers in executions in Afghanistan conducted surprise raids in Perth on Wednesday as part of its ongoing investigations.

 

It is the first time the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) has launched raids on targets and amounts to a major escalation of its almost five-year inquiry into civilian deaths at the hands of Australian soldiers. The raids were confirmed by three official sources not permitted to speak publicly about the agency’s work.

 

It is not clear if the raids were connected to the OSI’s examination of disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith, although detectives from the agency have spent months finalising the statements of witnesses who have agreed to testify against the disgraced war hero over his execution of prisoners and civilians.

 

The OSI is examining suspected murders beyond the four cases that were part of the ex-soldier’s failed bid to clear his name.

 

Witness statements collected by the OSI also deal with attempts by Roberts-Smith to cover up his war crimes.

 

The raids were welcomed by SAS veterans who served in Afghanistan and who believe Roberts-Smith and the small number of other soldiers who allegedly executed civilians and prisoners brought shame onto the special forces regiment and should be held to account.

 

However, veterans who back the war crimes suspects turned to social media to attack the OSI actions, claiming the raids were unjust. One post claimed the war crimes investigators, who include some of Australia’s most experienced homicide detectives, were trying to “shake the tree” to find evidence.

 

This masthead revealed last week that the OSI, which has been investigating war criminal Roberts-Smith over multiple murders, including cases not canvassed in his marathon defamation trial, has secured the co-operation of new witnesses.

 

Roberts-Smith’s comprehensive loss before the full bench of the Federal Court – which affirmed the finding that the Special Air Service Regiment veteran ordered or carried out the murder of four Afghans – paved the way for the OSI to prosecute the former corporal.

 

The OSI is staffed with elite detectives from state police forces, including handpicked homicide investigators.

 

Sources said the OSI’s inquiries had proceeded far more slowly than the agency had hoped, but this was due to a painstakingly exhaustive and risk-averse approach adopted by its chief, former top prosecutor and judge Mark Weinberg.

 

Weinberg has sought to avoid the legal pitfalls that led to the abandonment in 2021 of an earlier federal police war crimes investigation targeting Roberts-Smith.

 

Five sources with knowledge of the OSI’s ongoing four-year investigation said its investigators had secured co-operation from key witnesses who had not participated in Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial.

 

The OSI is working closely with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions as it builds its case against Roberts-Smith, having collected statements from over a dozen SASR soldiers who claim Roberts-Smith arranged or participated in executions, including an incident in which he kicked a bound civilian off a small cliff.

 

The OSI is working with the AFP to target Roberts-Smith and has secured more evidence and witness co-operation than the stymied federal police probe.

 

The OSI probe is not only aimed at seeking to prosecute Roberts-Smith but several of his accomplices who, like the disgraced war hero, were also found to have lied during the defamation proceedings to cover up war crimes.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/national/war-crimes-investigator-launches-raids-in-major-escalation-20250528-p5m31z.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 30, 2025, 7:19 a.m. No.23099049   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9054 >>9119 >>2367 >>3256 >>2147

Radical imam Ahmed Zoud’s apology to Jews one day, call for Allah to kill all ‘oppressors’ the next

 

STEPHEN RICE and MOHAMMAD ALFARES - May 29, 2025

 

1/2

 

An extremist cleric who preached that Jews were “bloodthirsty monsters” who “ran like rats” from the October 7 Hamas attack has formally apologised after Australia’s peak Jewish body lodged a vilification complaint over the ­sermon he delivered in 2023.

 

However, The Australian can reveal that, as recently as last Friday, Sheikh Ahmed Zoud issued a prayer to the people of Gaza at the end of his sermon, for Allah to “deal with the tyrants and the oppressors” and to “kill them all, and leave none of them behind”.

 

While Sheikh Zoud did not mention Jews by name in his latest rant, he had pledged in his apology not to repeat statements that “could be interpreted as targeting Jewish people as a whole”.

 

On Thursday, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry ­welcomed the resolution of its complaint against Sheikh Zoud (also known as Sheikh Zod) to the Australian Human Rights ­Commission following Mr Zoud’s “unreserved” apology.

 

ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim said the apology to the Jewish community was “a welcome admission of wrongdoing by Ahmed Zoud and we hope that it will serve as an example for the ­future about the limits of freedom of expression”.

 

“We hope that the resolution of this complaint will serve as a ­reaffirmation of the principle that Australia is a safe place for ­people of all backgrounds, and no place for the kind of ­immoderate and at times anti-­Semitic rhetoric that we have ­witnessed in recent times.”

 

Upon learning of Sheikh Zoud’s latest inflammatory remarks, Mr Wertheim told The Australian that, if the imam failed to adhere to his undertakings, “we will have no hesitation in availing ourselves of legal remedies to ­enforce them.”

 

“We expect the terms on which that complaint was resolved to be honoured,” Mr Wertheim said. “In particular, we expect that Ahmed Zoud will adhere to the undertakings that he has given, and this includes not making or publishing any statement which makes derogatory generalisations about Jews, including statements which attribute to Jews, as a group, characteristics that vilify and demonise.”

 

The Human Rights Commission complaint was brought by Mr Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot in March last year after a sermon by Sheikh Zoud entitled “The truth about the Jews and their characteristics”, delivered in Arabic in December 2023 at the Masjid As-Sunnah mosque the Sydney suburb of Lakemba.

 

“Who are these terrorists … these monsters … who have removed mercy from their hearts,” Sheikh Zoud said.

 

“These (people) are the Jews, not all of them, but most of them. The most important characteristic of the Jews is that they are thirsty for bloodshed … another is betrayal and treachery.”

 

Sheikh Zoud said the Jews “loved to shed blood” and accused them of raising their children on “violence, terrorism and killing”.

 

In a statement signed on April 23, Sheikh Zoud apologised “unreservedly and unconditionally” for his remarks.

 

“I deeply regret the way I framed my comments and understand how they could be interpreted as targeting Jewish people as a whole,” he said. “I did not ­intend to make such a sweeping generalisation. I did not seek to harm Jewish people based on their race or religion. This is not an excuse but an explanation to hopefully assure you that I will not repeat these comments.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 30, 2025, 7:20 a.m. No.23099054   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23099049

 

2/2

 

Sheikh Zoud read his apology in Arabic at the As-Sunnah mosque, acknowledging his 2023 sermon “contained harmful, ­insulting, and dehumanising ­generalisation about the Jewish people. “I used strong language when speaking about the Israeli army and government, and it was not my intention for that language to be directed at the Jewish people as a whole,” he said.

 

“I express regret for the way my comments were phrased and recognise how they could be ­interpreted as targeting Jews collectively. I did not intend to harm Jews because of their ethnicity or religion. This is not an excuse, but a clarification that I offer in the hope of assuring you that I will not repeat such comments.”

 

However, Sheikh Zoud also delivered a prayer in Arabic, later translated to English by The Australian, that included a series of supplications directed at what he described as oppressors. It began with prayers for the people of Gaza and Muslims around the world and pleas for divine assistance, then turned to invoking God’s retribution against “oppressors”.

 

“Oh, Allah, deal with those who have wronged them,” he said. “Oh, Allah, deal with the ­tyrants and the oppressors. Oh, Allah, count them one by one, kill them all, and leave none of them behind.”

 

Sheikh Zoud went on: “Oh, Allah, scatter their unity, disperse their gathering, cast terror into their hearts, and make their strength among themselves ­severe.”

 

In the final section of the sermon, he called on God to bring punishment: “Oh, Allah, unleash upon them the sword of your ­vengeance … Oh, Allah, strike them with a punishment from you. Oh, Allah, shake the earth beneath their feet, freeze the blood in their veins, and inflict upon them a black day like the day of Aad and Thamud.”

 

Aad and Thamud were two ancient Arab tribes mentioned repeatedly in the Quran as ­examples of peoples who rejected divine guidance and were ­destroyed by God for their arrogance and disobedience.

 

ECAJ has also lodged a complaint against firebrand cleric Wissam Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, alleging that in at least five sermons he made up to 40 defamatory imputations, including that Jews were “cowards, filthy, liars and schemers”.

 

In one lecture, Mr Haddad had described Jewish people as “a mischievous people who use their wealth to have authority over the weak”. He also quoted the hadith about “the Muslims fighting the Jews at the End of Times when the trees and stones will speak and tell the Muslims where the Jews are hiding so they can kill them”.

 

Mr Haddad has refused to apologise or retract the comments. That case is due to be heard over four days in the Federal Court from June 10.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/radical-imam-ahmed-zouds-apology-to-jews-one-day-call-for-allah-to-kill-all-oppressors-the-next/news-story/9480f92c559286f6ea3a88f497113662

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=Ahmed+Zoud

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 30, 2025, 7:33 a.m. No.23099119   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2313 >>2324 >>2367 >>2149

>>23099049

Radical cleric Wissam Haddad slams Muslim leaders

 

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 30 May 2025

 

A Sydney Islamic fundamentalist at the centre of a Federal Court battle has accused Muslim leaders of abandoning him in a case he claims pits “Islam against disbelievers”, while urging them to publicly defend the right to quote inflammatory scripture about Jews.

 

Wissam Haddad, who also goes by the name Abu Ousayd and leads the hardline Al Madina Dawah Centre, this week released a video appealing for religious unity ahead of a looming court showdown with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry.

 

The Federal Court proceedings, which are expected to test the limits of religious expression and hate speech laws, centre on whether Mr Haddad’s public sermons – referencing verses in the Koran about Jews – amount to incitement or protected religious expression.

 

The proceedings have been brought by ECAJ co-CEO Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot AO, and allege that Mr Haddad’s public speeches included derogatory generalisations about Jewish people, in which he described them as “vile people” and a “treacherous people”, and claimed they hide like “rats” when fighting Muslim men.

 

In the video posted on Tuesday, Mr Haddad said he was concerned that Muslim leaders were retreating from the right to quote Islamic texts in public.

 

“For the past couple of months I had been struggling, striving, trying to have the Muslim community at large and specifically the sheiks (clerics) and Muslim organisations understand that what I am currently facing in the Federal Court is not an issue of Abu Ousayd or Al Madina Dawah Centre versus the Jewish lobby … rather, it’s a battle between Islam and kuffar (disbelievers),” he said.

 

“They wish to take and make those ayat and hadith (verses in the Koran) and historic accounts that speak about the Jews to what they see as insulting … they seek to make it criminal.”

 

Mr Haddad claimed many Islamic organisations had refused to support his legal battle and warned that failing to do so would set a dangerous precedent to their “God-given right.”

 

The Australian understands that despite his desperate plea for support from some of the nation’s most prominent Muslim figures and organisations, Mr Haddad was largely flagged as a rogue cleric and was vehemently refused any backing. He has publicly insulted, attacked and accused many of the mainstream organisations who disagreed with his views as being “kuffar”.

 

“After repeated attempts, after numerous meetings with Muslim organisations and sheiks to try and get them to understand the seriousness of this case, many are still in denial,” Mr Haddad said.

 

Referencing extremist preacher Ahmed Zoud’s public apology to the Jews after a 2023 sermon in which he called them “bloodthirsty monsters” who “ran like rats” from the October 7 Hamas attack, Mr Haddad said his plea for financial and moral support came as a “last push”, adding that the Muslim community must “prove to Allah” their loyalty.

 

“We have all seen the video of Sheik Ahmed Zoud coming out openly, publicly apologising to the Jewish community. Apologising for the very same ayat and hadith (verses) which were referenced in the majority of my talks,” he said.

 

“So as a last attempt, as a last push, I ask you, the Muslim community and specifically the sheiks and the Muslim organisations, to get behind this cause. To join the caravan, it is not too late. Stand up for this God-given right that Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta’ala had given us to quote from the Koran and from the Sunnah. Do not sit on the sidelines.”

 

Mr Haddad has previously boasted of his friendship with Islamic State jihadis Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar and said it was “not illegal” to be friends with convicted terrorists, while spruiking his relationship with “dear brother” Anjem Choudary, one of Britain’s most notorious extremists.

 

He has never been charged with any terrorism-related offence, despite his longstanding notoriety and ties to a web of dangerous terrorists.

 

A former ASIO spy called “Marcus”, who infiltrated Mr Haddad’s prayer centre between 2016 and 2023, revealed to the ABC’s Four Corners that young people in his controversial small-scale prayer centre in Bankstown were being indoctrinated into supporting Islamic State.

 

The Federal Court case between Mr Haddad and the ECAJ is scheduled to run for four days, beginning June 10.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/extremist-calls-for-muslim-support-in-battle-over-antijewish-sermons/news-story/e2833955cc166e7980ad56a7e0be74bc

 

https://www.instagram.com/abu.ousayd/reel/DKMWbPGJgpl/

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=Wissam+Haddad

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 30, 2025, 7:38 a.m. No.23099153   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9169 >>3570 >>3619 >>2207

>>22968851

Call to arm: US in direct defence spending plea to Richard Marles

 

BEN PACKHAM - 30 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Donald Trump’s Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth has issued a direct call for Australia to lift defence spending in face-to-face talks with Richard Marles, amid a US push for its global allies to stop free-riding off American military power.

 

The Defence Minister assured his US counterpart that Australia was “very much up for that ­conversation”, just a day after Anthony Albanese ridiculed the nation’s top strategic think tank over its criticism of Australia’s “business as usual” defence budget.

 

The US Defence Secretary’s call comes ahead of the Prime Minister’s first meeting with the US President in a fortnight at the G7 summit in Canada, where Mr Albanese will be looking for tariff ­relief and a firm commitment from Mr Trump to the AUKUS nuclear submarine partnership.

 

The government left the ­defence budget languishing at about 2 per cent of GDP in the March budget, rising to a forecast 2.33 per cent in eight years, despite its own warnings of unprecedented strategic circumstances and US calls for allies to lift military spending to at least 3 per cent of national output.

 

Mr Marles revealed Mr Hegseth urged him to boost the ­defence budget when they met on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Friday.

 

“The need to increase defence spending is something that he definitely raised,” Mr Marles told the ABC.

 

“You’ve seen the Americans in the way in which they’ve engaged with all of their friends and allies, asking them to do more. And we can completely understand why America would do that. And I would say this was done in a very respectful and dignified way, and we understand it and we’re very much up for that conversation.”

 

Mr Marles declined to reveal how much more Mr Hegseth wanted Australia to spend on defence. But the now-head of policy at the Pentagon, Elbridge Colby, made clear ahead of his April appointment that Australia needed to lift the defence budget to at least 3 per cent of GDP – a benchmark that would require an extra $28bn a year to be pumped into the military.

 

Mr Trump has called on European nations to spend even more, demanding 5 per cent of GDP from NATO members.

 

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute warned in its Cost of Defence report this week that the government’s failure to boost ­defence spending and its focus on future capabilities such as AUKUS had left a hollowed-out defence force that was ill-­prepared for near-term conflict. “While those future capabilities are strategically important, they offer little immediate enhancement, thus creating a ‘paper ADF’ that lacks readiness for near-term conflict scenarios,” it said.

 

The Prime Minister responded to the report on Thursday by attacking the think tank’s credibility and independence.

 

“ASPI regularly produce these sort of reports … I think it’s predictable, frankly,” Mr Albanese said. “What we’re doing is getting on with the defence assets and providing the investment for those assets to be upgraded.”

 

ASPI executive director Justin Bassi welcomed Mr Marles’ comments on Friday. “The Defence Minister is absolutely right that we should be up for a conversation on increasing defence spending to meet the rising strategic threats we face,” Mr Bassi said. “Our report this week reached the same conclusion. We need to invest more, invest sooner and invest more smartly.

 

“That’s simply in Australia’s interests and that’s a widely ­accepted view in defence and strategic circles.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 30, 2025, 7:40 a.m. No.23099169   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23099153

 

2/2

 

The Prime Minister’s long-awaited meeting with Mr Trump in Alberta next month is shaping as a key moment in the bilateral relationship. Mr Albanese, who may also make a trip to Washington DC on either side of the summit, will be seeking a tariff carve-out and a firm commitment from the President to the AUKUS deal to provide three Virginia-class submarines to Australia.

 

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced before a visit to the White House in February that the UK would lift defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027, with a “clear ambition” to reach 3 per cent in the next term of parliament.

 

Mr Marles said Mr Hegseth had made clear the Trump ­administration’s support for AUKUS when they met in February, and the Defence Secretary reiterated that message on Friday. “I’m very much encouraged by the relationship which is growing between myself and Pete Hegseth in our respective roles,” he said. “But fundamentally we feel a sense of confidence about how we can manage AUKUS specifically.”

 

Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said Labor had “chronically underfunded defence” despite worsening strategic threats. “We must ensure our Defence Force has the funding it needs to keep our nation safe and prepared,” he said.

 

“Before the election the Coalition committed to increasing defence spending to 2.5 per of GDP within five years and 3 per cent within a decade. That was a clear signal: we are serious about delivering capability at the scale the times demand.”

 

Mr Hegseth will deliver the keynote speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue on Saturday. The address to Southeast Asia’s premier defence conference has been hotly anticipated, amid regional concerns over the Trump administration’s trade war, foreign aid cuts and escalating tensions with China. Mr Marles will also address the dialogue, calling for fresh global rules to curb nuclear weapons proliferation.

 

He will argue expired Cold War arms treaties need to be replaced with new multilateral agreements. He will also single out China, arguing its “rapid ­nuclear modernisation and ­expansion … is another reason the future of strategic arms control must be revitalised”.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/call-to-arm-us-in-direct-defence-spending-plea-to-richard-marles/news-story/86a32b3f4568b8872d565fa4e07f946b

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5CCWFCdLujk

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 7:30 a.m. No.23103516   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2144

>>23002836

>>23076612

>>23083147

Tim Wilson officially new member for Goldstein after tight margins saw Zoe Daniel order a recount

 

EMMA KIRK and THOMAS HENRY - 31 May 2025

 

A new member for the Melbourne seat of Goldstein has been crowned, four weeks after the federal election.

 

Independent candidate Zoe Daniel demanded a recount after losing the seat to Liberal moderate Tim Wilson by just 260 votes, saying several errors were made during the distribution of preferences.

 

The Australian Electoral Commission finalised the partial recount of 85,000 votes on Saturday confirming Mr Wilson had won with a margin of 175 votes.

 

The former teal independent MP confirmed over social media she had officially conceded the marginal Melbourne seat, throwing jabs at the Liberal Party campaign in the process.

 

In a video to her supporters, the climate-200 backed candidate suggested that “two steps forward is sometimes followed by one back”.

 

“We do not seek to divide to win, we do not shelve our ethics or our principles. We do not resort to attack advertising, misinformation, disinformation, dirty tricks or personal attacks,” she said.

 

“Winning that way is not something to be proud of.”

 

In a statement posted to social media, Mr Wilson said after 29 days of counting the Liberals had 14,697 more first preference votes than the former MP.

 

“I want to thank all Goldstein voters, but particularly the extraordinary effort some went to so their voice was heard,” he said.

 

“Now the recount is finished, the result is clear. It is time to get on with the job and take the voice and values of Goldstein to shape the future of Australia.”

 

Ms Daniel declared victory in the highly contested seat on election night after early counting leaned heavily in her favour.

 

But a surge in postal votes over the following days swung the pendulum back into blue-ribbon territory, with the seat actually called for Mr Wilson on May 7.

 

Ms Daniel refused to concede the seat at the time and insisted on waiting for the full distribution of preferences and then demanded a recount, which was granted in part by the Australian Electoral Commission (AEC).

 

She said it had been a long process to recount the 85,000 votes representing 75 per cent of votes cast.

 

“Goldstein is now one of the most marginal seats in the country, and with that comes embedded accountability,” she said.

 

“In that, we have done our job.

 

“In a world where trust in elections is being eroded in so many places, we should never take this for granted.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/tim-wilson-officially-new-member-for-goldstein-after-tight-margins-saw-zoe-daniel-order-a-recount/news-story/fed5e5ad42dada9df6fe656826a4216d

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 7:37 a.m. No.23103541   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3547 >>6961 >>0675 >>4204 >>2207

>>23094571

‘Unjustified’: Donald Trump claims steel tariff will double, as Australia lashes surprise move

 

BLAIR JACKSON and THOMAS HENRY - 31 May 2025

 

1/2

 

Donald Trump has claimed the tariff rate on steel will double to 50 per cent, drawing the ire of the Australian government.

 

The US President blurted out the latest development in his trade war at a steel mill rally in Pennsylvania, on Saturday morning Australian time.

 

Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said the latest tariff hike was unjustified.

 

Mr Farrell has flagged a meeting, brokered by US Ambassador Kevin Rudd, with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Paris sometime next week.

 

“This is certainly not the act of a friend, we’ve had a very long and trusting relationship with the United States… We’re going to coolly and calmly argue for the removal of these tariffs,” Minister Farrell said.

 

The Labor minister pointed to the government’s track record negotiating with China on tariffs imposed on Australian products during the Morrison government.

 

He will also meet with Chinese trade representatives on Monday for the 10th time which he says will ensure continued “tariff-free” trade with the nation’s biggest trading partner.

 

Earlier in the day, Mr Farrell said Australia’s position had been consistent and clear. “These tariffs are … an act of economic self harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade.

 

“We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs.”

 

US government data shows the price of steel products into the US have increased by 16 per cent since Trump’s second term began.

 

Australian car parts, steel and aluminium are currently being slapped with a 25 per cent levy, as per Trump’s sweeping protectionist policies.

 

Meanwhile, in Singapore Defence Minister Richard Marles also took a swipe at the Trump administration’s tariff agenda while also welcoming the assurance by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth that allies in the Indo-Pacific will not be left alone to face increasing military and economic pressure from China.

 

“Reality is that there is no effective balance of power in this region absent the United States, but we cannot leave it to the United States alone,” he said, agreeing that Australia and other nations needed to do their part..

 

But the Australian Defence Minister also suggested the Trump administration’s aggressive trade policies were counterproductive.

 

“The shock and disruption from the high tariffs has been costly and destabilising,” he said, responding to Hegseth’s keynote speech at a security conference in Singapore.

 

Opposition shadow Trade Minister Kevin Hogan said the move was “concerning for Australian jobs” while calling on the government to “double its efforts to protect our steel industry”.

 

“The strength of our economic partnership has been built on trust and mutual benefit, and any deviation from this agreement undermines the principles of free trade,” he said in a statement.

 

“This is why it is imperative that the Australian Prime Minister personally meets with President Trump, as he is expected to do on the sidelines of the G7 in Canada in a couple of weeks.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 7:38 a.m. No.23103547   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23103541

 

2/2

 

US government data shows the price of steel products into the US have increased by 16 per cent since Trump’s second term began.

 

Australian car parts, steel and aluminium are currently being slapped with a 25 per cent levy, as per Trump’s sweeping protectionist policies.

 

The Pennsylvania rally on Friday was near a factory owned by US Steel, and the President said Japanese steel giant Nippon had invested in the American firm.

 

“We’re here today to celebrate a blockbuster agreement that will ensure this storeyed American company stays an American company,” the President said.

 

“You’re going to stay an American company, you know that, right?”

 

“If you don’t have steel, you don’t have a country. You don’t have a country, you can’t make a military. What are we going to do? Say, ‘Let’s go to China to get our steel from the army tanks’,” Trump said.

 

The Trump administration initially promised to block Nippon’s bid to buy US Steel. Details of the “blockbuster agreement” have not been released. Nippon confirmed in a statement a proposed “partnership” had been agreed to.

 

This week a US trade court blocked most of President Trump’s tariffs, ruling he had overstepped Congress in using emergency powers to regulate trade.

 

The ruling did not apply to the steel, aluminium and vehicle tariffs, however, which were imposed using different laws.

 

The Trump administration immediately filed an appeal to the Court of International Trade’s decision and questioned the authority of the court.

 

The court decision was released on Wednesday US time, and financial markets rallied on the news.

 

The lawsuit was filed by 12 US states, plus five small businesses who argued the tariffs hurt their ability to do business. If allowed by the courts, the administration’s appeal would next go to the Court of Appeals, and then the Supreme Court if necessary.

 

Australia is one of the few countries which buys more from the US than we sell to the nation.

 

NewsWire has contacted some of Australia’s largest steel manufacturers for comment, following the latest tariff increase threat.

 

BlueScope employs about 4000 Americans, with its major US plant being in Ohio.

 

However, the company exports about 300,000 tonnes of semi-processed steel from Australia to the US each year.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/unjustified-donald-trump-claims-steel-tariff-will-double-as-australia-lashes-surprise-move/news-story/7ecd9f67980d1e82da0ccd4cd65e2e5c

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l6Cygo95gjg

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 7:45 a.m. No.23103570   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3576 >>3619 >>6959 >>1511 >>1526 >>1593 >>1605 >>5940 >>0694 >>2207

>>23032055

>>23099153

‘Real and could be imminent’: Hegseth warns on China threat, says US ready to fight

 

Lisa Visentin - May 31, 2025

 

1/2

 

Singapore: US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has delivered a blistering warning to China that America stands ready to “fight and win decisively” if it seeks military conflict over Taiwan, declaring the threat posed is real and could be imminent.

 

In a strident speech to top defence officials from across the Indo-Pacific, Hegseth said the region was America’s “priority theatre” and declared the Trump administration had a renewed focus on deterring China.

 

He said the US would not instigate conflict with China or seek regime change, but in a significant declaration of policy said “we will not be pushed out of this critical region, and we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated”.

 

Hegseth’s remarks are some of the strongest to date from the Trump administration about its preparedness to defend the Indo-Pacific with military force in the face of increasing Chinese territorial aggression in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea.

 

He also used the speech on Saturday to press US partners in Asia to boost defence spending towards 5 per cent of gross domestic product.

 

Hegseth had already pushed his Australian counterpart, Richard Marles, to ramp up defence spending to counter China’s increasing assertiveness. Marles declined to divulge what figure the pair discussed, but the demand would likely mean billions of dollars in extra defence funding.

 

Hegseth’s position statement will be judged by political leaders against the backdrop of recent US action seen to have fostered uncertainty across the region, including the threat of steep tariffs on many Asian countries and the dismantling of US foreign aid programs that experts have warned will create a soft-power vacuum for China to fill.

 

Repeating US intelligence claims that Chinese President Xi Jinping had ordered the People’s Liberation Army be ready to execute a takeover of Taiwan by 2027, Hegseth said this would result in devastating consequences for the world

 

“There’s no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,” he said in the speech to the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia’s leading security conference.

 

America’s goal was to prevent war through forceful deterrence, he said – but if that failed, the US would act.

 

“If deterrence fails and if called upon by my commander in chief, we are prepared to do what the Department of Defence does best, to fight and win decisively,” Hegseth said.

 

The Lowy Institute’s Susannah Patton, director of the think tank’s South-East Asia program, said the speech would be well-received by US allies such as Australia and Japan because it continued the previous administration’s commitment to defence co-operation in Asia.

 

“But the starkly confrontational tone on China won’t reassure South-east Asian countries who worry about the risk of rising tensions or conflict,” she said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 7:46 a.m. No.23103576   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23103570

 

2/2

 

Hegseth’s speech contrasted starkly with the tone struck earlier by French President Emmanuel Macron in his address to the conference on Friday evening.

 

Macron warned that the intensifying rivalry between the US and China posed the greatest threat to global security, saying the two superpowers were charting a dangerous course to split global alliances into two competing camps.

 

“The instruction given to all the others [is] you have to choose your side. If we do so, we will kill the global order, and we will destroy methodically, all the institutions we created after the Second World War in order to preserve peace,” Macron said.

 

He issued a rallying call for Europe and Asia to build new coalitions to reject bullying, uphold trade norms, and protect countries’ sovereignty, and to ensure they were not “collateral victims” to the “choices made by the superpowers”. It is an appeal that will resonate across the Indo-Pacific region, which feels increasingly wedged between China and America.

 

In a thinly veiled swipe at the Trump administration’s weakened interest in defending Ukraine, Macron denounced the view that the war was a solely European conflict, and one that was sapping resources from other arenas, saying Ukraine’s fall to Russia would undermine US attempts to deter China from seizing Taiwan.

 

“Allow me to say, this is a total mistake,” Macron said. “Because if we consider that Russia could be allowed to take a part of the territory of Ukraine without any restriction, without any constraint, without any reaction of the global order … what could happen in Taiwan? What will you do the day something happens in the Philippines?”

 

Macron also took aim at China, saying it should do more to influence its ally North Korea against joining Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

 

“If China doesn’t want NATO being involved in South-east Asia or in Asia, they should prevent North Korea from engaging on European soil,” he said.

 

Macron said global stability was being jeopardised by double standards in how the international community confronted key humanitarian challenges such as the war in Gaza and climate change.

 

“If we abandon Gaza, if we consider there is a free pass for Israel, even if we do condemn the terrorist attacks, we kill our own credibility … what is at stake is clearly the global order, and what is at stake is our credibility to protect this global order,” he said.

 

In a break with previous years, China has not sent its Defence Minister Dong Jun to this year’s dialogue, forgoing the potential for a bilateral meeting with the US on the sidelines of the conference as has occurred in previous years. Beijing has instead dispatched a low-level military university delegation.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/us-china-rivalry-the-biggest-threat-to-global-security-macron-warns-20250530-p5m3q8.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=URXpbF7dSLg

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 7:54 a.m. No.23103619   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3624 >>6959 >>1511 >>2209

>>23032055

>>23099153

>>23103570

‘Peace through strength’: Marles backs Hegseth after ‘stark’ China warning

 

Lisa Visentin - May 31, 2025

 

1/2

 

Singapore: Defence Minister Richard Marles has endorsed a blistering address by his US counterpart warning China that America stands ready to “fight and win decisively” if Beijing seeks military conflict over Taiwan.

 

In a strident speech to top defence officials from across the Indo-Pacific on Saturday, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the region was America’s “priority theatre” and that the threat posed by China is real – and potentially imminent.

 

Speaking to this masthead after the address – the first major declaration of the Trump administration’s Indo-Pacific policy – Marles described it as “a very clear articulation of American intent, that what they seek is peace through strength”.

 

“It gives us a lot to work with in terms of working with this administration … there was a really clear focus on allies and partners,” Marles said in an interview on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Security Dialogue, Asia’s premier defence summit, in Singapore on Saturday.

 

“One of our key concerns is that we have witnessed with China the biggest conventional military build-up of any country since the end of the Second World War, and that has happened without strategic reassurance or transparency.”

 

Hegseth used his speech to send the message that the US would not instigate conflict with China or seek regime change, while reassuring allies the US was prepared to defend the region in the face of China’s increasing territorial aggression in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea, saying “we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated”.

 

“There’s no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,” he said. “If deterrence fails and if called upon by my commander-in-chief, we are prepared to do what the Department of Defence does best, to fight and win decisively.”

 

Hegseth also made clear the Trump administration would push its Asian allies to ramp up defence spending to near 5 per cent of gross domestic product, in line with commitments by NATO partners, which he claimed were spending more to combat a less formidable threat.

 

It’s a pressure he applied to Marles when the pair met for face-to-face talks on Friday. Marles declined to divulge what spending figure the pair discussed, but the demand would likely mean billions of dollars in extra defence funding.

 

Hegseth’s reassurance of the US’s commitment to the Indo-Pacific is one that many of the region’s political leaders would be seeking – but not necessarily trust.

 

In the frenzied early months of the Trump administration, trading partners have been threatened with high tariffs, crucial aid development programs have been axed, and rock-solid alliances have been rattled by signals the US is embracing a more isolationist position on the global stage.

 

Asked whether any of the Trump administration’s actions had shaken his faith in the reliability of the US as Australia’s foremost ally, Marles reaffirmed that the US alliance remained the cornerstone of Australia’s strategic and foreign policy.

 

But he added “we will say what needs to be said, even to our close ally”.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 7:55 a.m. No.23103624   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23103619

 

2/2

 

The Lowy Institute’s Susannah Patton, director of the think tank’s South-East Asia program, said while Hegseth’s speech would be well-received by allies including Australia and Japan, the “starkly confrontational tone on China won’t reassure South-East Asian countries who worry about the risk of rising tensions or conflict”.

 

Hegseth’s speech contrasted significantly in tone and substance to the one delivered by French President Emmanuel Macron in his address to the conference on Friday evening.

 

Macron warned that the intensifying rivalry between the US and China posed the greatest threat to global security, saying the two superpowers were charting a dangerous course to split global alliances into two competing camps.

 

“The instruction given to all the others [is] you have to choose your side. If we do so, we will kill the global order, and we will destroy methodically all the institutions we created after the Second World War in order to preserve peace,” Macron said.

 

He issued a rallying call for Europe and Asia to build new coalitions to reject bullying, uphold trade norms, and protect countries’ sovereignty, and to ensure they were not “collateral victims” to the “choices made by the superpowers”. It is an appeal that will resonate across the Indo-Pacific region, which feels increasingly wedged between China and America.

 

In a thinly veiled swipe at the Trump administration’s weakened interest in defending Ukraine, Macron denounced the view that the war was a solely European conflict, and one that was sapping resources from other arenas, saying Ukraine’s fall to Russia would undermine US attempts to deter China from seizing Taiwan.

 

“Allow me to say, this is a total mistake,” Macron said. “Because if we consider that Russia could be allowed to take a part of the territory of Ukraine without any restriction, without any constraint, without any reaction of the global order … what could happen in Taiwan? What will you do the day something happens in the Philippines?”

 

Macron also took aim at China, saying it should do more to influence its ally North Korea against joining Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

 

“If China doesn’t want NATO being involved in South-East Asia or in Asia, they should prevent North Korea from engaging on European soil,” he said.

 

Macron said global stability was being jeopardised by double standards in how the international community confronted key humanitarian challenges such as the war in Gaza and climate change.

 

“If we abandon Gaza, if we consider there is a free pass for Israel, even if we do condemn the terrorist attacks, we kill our own credibility … what is at stake is clearly the global order, and what is at stake is our credibility to protect this global order,” he said.

 

In a break with previous years, China did not send its Defence Minister, Dong Jun, to this year’s dialogue, forgoing the potential for a bilateral meeting with the US on the sidelines of the conference as has occurred in previous years. Beijing has instead dispatched a low-level military university delegation.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/world/asia/peace-through-strength-marles-backs-hegseth-after-stark-china-warning-20250531-p5m3sg.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 8:10 a.m. No.23103697   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3706

‘Is your father your abuser?’ Breaking free of the shame of decades of sexual abuse

 

Beck Rogers’ case, according to experienced police officers, is the worst case of incest they have ­encountered. While sharing it with us, her health suffered. And yet she is resolute in the hope that her story will reach someone who is suffering in silence.

 

PETER HOYSTED - 31 May 2025

 

1/4

 

The first step across the threshold of a police station is the hardest one to take for sexual assault victims. In April 2023, Beck Rogers trembled as she entered the Sexual Offences and Child Abuse Investigation Team (SOCIT) office at Frankston in ­Melbourne’s southeast. Her husband, Will, had done the research. Don’t go to a police station, he told her. A Google search urged victims of sexual abuse to go directly to one of the 28 SOCIT offices in Victoria.

 

Beck felt a wave of nausea and her head pounded, but she pushed on. She was ushered into an interview room. Her mind raced. Where to start? How to unravel 36 years of sustained torture? Beck had suffered a lifetime of ­protracted sexual abuse, emotional control and financial coercion committed wilfully and ­frequently by her father.

 

In telling this story to The Australian ­Weekend Magazine, Beck Rogers has decided not to hide behind an alias. She is now 41, a wife and a mother. Not long ago, it would have been almost impossible to share her experience ­publicly in this way. She would have been tied up in suppression orders that ancient lawmakers had deemed were put in place for her own protection.

 

Beck’s first memory of life was sitting in the bath at her Frankston home. She was three years of age and her father had touched her ­indecently. The last episode of sexual abuse would take place over three decades later.

 

A male detective sitting across the table took notes as she spoke. Beck found him impassive and intimidating, if not downright scary as he initially played devil’s advocate, warning her that if her story was contrived or fabricated she could face criminal charges. A female social worker sat in, too, her kind eyes and gentle smile a merciful contrast to the detective’s stony face. Beck pressed on and the detective’s tone would begin to soften. Beck could tell she was believed. She left the SOCIT office 45 minutes later, with a police business card and a promise that she would receive a call within days. A week later, she was summoned to the SOCIT office again. Detective Senior Constable Kathy Squire had been assigned to her case. Squire had read the notes taken at the ­preliminary interview and was aghast. She had been investigating sexual assaults for 30 years but had never seen anything quite like this.

 

As a professional, Squire kept her emotions in check. Her job delves into humanity at its worst. Maintaining distance ­between herself and victims was necessary. Yet she has a heart.

 

“I was immediately drawn to Beck,” Squire tells this Magazine. “Her smile was infectious but I knew it concealed horrific abuse.”

 

The two women bonded as Beck’s life was stripped bare. Beck’s statement was prepared during four separate sittings over two weeks. The first would take seven hours, the second the same, then six hours and finally two.

 

Outwardly Beck’s demeanour was determined and resolved, but she would find the process exhausting, triggering and re-traumatising. She had night terrors, shrieking herself to consciousness from intermittent sleep. Beck has suffered from seizures for much of her adult life. At first she was treated for epilepsy. Later, she was diagnosed with Functional Neurological Disorder, a trauma-related condition. The ­seizures became more frequent after she ­decided to confront her past, but she was ­determined to push on.

 

It had been a warm February evening in 2023 when Beck decided the abuse had to end. She and Will had arrived at her ­father’s home for dinner. Over pasta her father, Stephen Colwill, asked the couple if they would take out a mortgage on his home. He was struggling with the payments, he said, seemingly ­untroubled by the fact that Beck and Will were renting and saving for their own home. Beck suddenly saw what her father’s begging meant. The coercion would never end.

 

“It was like a gut punch. I felt sick in the pit of my stomach,” she says. She dashed to the ­toilet and was violently ill. It was the last straw on a long list of her father’s sins.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 8:12 a.m. No.23103706   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3722

>>23103697

 

2/4

 

In the weeks that followed, Beck’s determination to end her father’s control over her amounted to prolonged suicidal ideation. She decided she would travel to her father’s home and slash her wrists in front of him. For days on end, she contemplated a terrible death and ­prepared her last words, a final corrosive spray, staring into her father’s eyes. “I would say, ­‘Because of you, I don’t want to live anymore’.”

 

It may have ended that way had it not been for the intervention of another family member who was observing Beck’s distress. As the two women talked, Beck was tearful and reticent until she heard a question she could not shy away from: “Is your father your abuser?”

 

While the path was not yet obvious, Beck saw that there could be another way to end her pain. First, she had to tell her husband.

 

Will is a big man – 190cm tall on a frame tipping the scales at 110kg – and a former rifleman with the ADF. The couple met in 2001 and quickly grew close. They’ve been together now for 24 years. They married in 2015, 10 years after their son was born.

 

There is no good time to speak of the unspeakable, but Beck chose her moment after dinner and when her son had gone to bed. Visibly shaking, she started her speech mindful of the threats her father had so frequently impressed upon her.

 

For the first time her husband was enjoined in the darkest of secrets – and unsurprisingly, his first reaction was shock and anger. “I wish you had told me this 20 years ago,” Will told his wife, and stormed out into the backyard to smoke one cigarette after the other until he reached a state of calm. He went back into the house, kissed his wife and told her, “I’ll be there for you.” And he has. Every day.

 

The rate and frequency of incest or ­interfamilial child sexual abuse in Australia is not properly understood. There are obvious ­issues around reporting or the lack of it. Victims are more likely to be cajoled or threatened into silence.

 

Clare Leaney, co-founder of the National Survivors’ Day and CEO of In Good Faith Foundation, an independent recovery service for victims of child sexual abuse, says the act of coming forward requires extraordinary determination amid deep fears that the family unit will not survive the victim’s revelations. “Let’s not understate the courage it takes for victims to report the crimes committed upon them, knowing there will be ramifications that can lead to family breakdown. This can never be spoken of highly enough,” says Leaney. “It is too easy to sermonise and neatly fit child sex ­offenders into a stereotype. [But] it is far more likely that the abuser is a family member or a close associate.”

 

The Australian Bureau of Statistics published statistics on child sex offending in 2023 that showed 10 per cent of Australians have ­suffered sexual abuse at the hands of a family member, while just two per cent experienced abuse within an institutional setting.

 

As Beck’s story became known to police, many wondered how the abuse could have continued for so long into her adult life. Even Kathy Squire’s police colleagues, hardened by years of investigating sexual assault cases, were among them.

 

“The level of control a person asserts on their victim can in some cases become normalised to the victim, as it is all they have ever known,” Leaney explains.

 

Squire offers her own thoughts: “You have to remember the time period and how young Beck was when it began. The abuse and threats went hand in hand. Her ­father had frequently told Beck that if she ­decided to tell all, she would be responsible for the ensuing family breakdown. She came to ­believe she would wear the blame.

 

“When I first met Beck. I could tell how well he had groomed her. Beck knew her father’s ­depravity was wrong. But it was far easier to give into his demands. It was easier to give in than deal with his anger. Beck loved her father and craved a father’s love. She had hoped that the abuse would end and that a normal father-daughter relationship might somehow emerge.”

 

While acknowledging that she feared her ­father, Beck tells this Magazine: “I was more frightened of losing my family.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 8:13 a.m. No.23103722   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3730

>>23103706

 

3/4

 

Beck’s mother once walked into her ­daughter’s bedroom to find her husband in bed with her. Beck was 11 years old. Her youngest sister, Jess, was not quite six. Their mother ­immediately evicted Colwill from the family home. Colwill took up lodgings at his parents’ place in nearby Seaford, and remained there for 30 years.

 

Colwill insisted on access visits every fortnight – and on almost every occasion, Beck was sexually abused. The abuse became more ­brazen with Colwill enjoying the freedom of ­living with only his two elderly parents to watch over him. The penetrative sex had begun when Beck was just eight.

 

Despite earning a decent wage, Colwill was always broke. He’d splurge his pay cheque on clothes for himself, CDs, hi-fi equipment and his substantial pornography collection. There was little money at home for Beck and her ­sister, who often went without food.

 

At 14 Beck began working at a local ice cream shop, only to see her meagre wages taken from her to pay for the family’s food bill. Financial control was enjoined with sexual abuse. When Beck and her father met for a meal at restaurants years later, she would ­always pay. She bought him groceries when he complained of having no food. She paid his electricity bills after he moaned about being penniless.

 

Later, when Beck became pregnant with her son, her father suggested Will would leave her. ­Colwill often fantasised about a life with his daughter and the child they would raise as their own. Pack up and go live in the country somewhere, he thought.

 

The abuse and control continued, hidden in plain sight, until Beck knew that it could only end when she ended it.

 

With Beck’s 32-page statement, Detective Squire obtained a warrant to search Colwill’s home. Beck thinks her father had become ­complacent, certain that his daughter would never find the courage to go to the police. He had always told her, “If anything happens to me, get the hard drive out of my computer and run it over in your car. Destroy it.”

 

When police came calling on July 30, 2023, what they found was a smoking gun of corroboration, including sexualised images of Beck from a glamour shoot Colwill had arranged for his daughter. He was arrested immediately and charged with 60 offences.

 

Colwill denied everything. Remarkably, he was bailed the following day. Beck was left ­fearful of her father’s reprisals. Squire had filed orders with the courts restraining Colwill from making any contact with Beck or Will. Colwill, trying to paint himself as a victim, argued that he was the one at risk, inferring Will might turn to some rough justice. Not long after being bailed, police ordered Colwill to hand in his knife collection.

 

Beck fretted over giving evidence and the ­inevitable cross-examination, but on the eve of a committal hearing at the Melbourne Magistrates’ Court in May 2024, she received a call from a solicitor at the Office of Public Prosecutions. Her father had agreed to plead guilty to 30 charges. Beck felt no relief. “I was quite gutted,” she says. “I wanted to take him down. I felt I had been denied my chance to speak.”

 

By the time the plea hearing took place in the County Court in November, the plea deal had been rolled into just nine charges with a single count of rape removed. This infuriated Beck but she knew it was beyond her control. Colwill remained on bail.

 

As her father formally pleaded guilty, Beck took comfort in knowing he would be present in the courtroom when she delivered her victim impact statement. She had laboured for hours over it. Judge Patricia Riddell permitted Beck to make her statement seated with Will holding her hand. Her father sat in the dock, and she looked him in the eye.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc May 31, 2025, 8:15 a.m. No.23103730   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23103722

 

4/4

 

“I have carried the weight of my situation and carried emotional baggage that I refuse to carry around any longer,” Beck said. “I am handing it over to you now, father. You get to feel the weight and have the burden of shame. You can be humiliated now. You can finally pay for what you have done. You have ruined the last 41 years of my life, inflicting unimaginable pain and suffering. I have no father. Exposing you is the beginning of my new life. I am going to not only survive, but I am going to live life and be truly happy surrounded by all the people that you tried to convince me would run away. I am not alone, but you will be. I will take my past and draw strength, resilience and make every moment count.

 

“I am finally free of shame, of embarrassment and of manipulation. But mostly, I am free of you and that is the greatest thing that I have ever achieved. So now, although I am seen as a victim in the court, in my heart, and in the eyes of all whom I care about, I am a survivor.”

 

Shortly afterwards, Colwill was taken into custody. He would face the court for sentencing in the new year.

 

On February 19, 2025, Beck entered the courthouse free of anxiety for the first time. Judge Riddell referred to Beck’s statement throughout her sentencing remarks. Beck looked at her father, who appeared by video link from prison looking gaunt and diminished, his power over her now gone. When the sentence came, Beck misheard or perhaps misunderstood it. She rose from her seat and left the courtroom thinking her father had been sentenced to 11 years. Outside there was applause and hugs. That’s when Beck heard it for the first time. Her father had been sentenced to 21 years and five months in prison, with a non-parole period of 14 years and eight months.

 

“I was in shock at first,” Beck says. “Then the penny dropped. ‘Wow, I have done it. I’ve got justice. I’ve got my freedom’.” But she wasn’t finished yet.

 

Victoria’s suppression laws – which silenced victims of sexual abuse – were amended in November 2020, with victims still able to choose if they wish to remain anonymous. Others who refuse to be silenced, like Beck, can have their say. And yet, public accounts of severe sexual abuse remain rare.

 

Says Squire: “These crimes often go unreported because normally the victim is told they will cause the breakdown of the family unit … Shame, fear and guilt often prevent them from coming forward.”

 

Beck’s story, according to experienced police officers, is the worst case of incest they have ­encountered. While sharing it with The Australian Weekend Magazine, the frequency of her seizures increased. Beck cannot drive a car and is unable to work. And yet she is resolute in the hope her story will reach someone who is suffering in silence.

 

“I just want to help other people,” she says. “I often think if I had known about the stories of other people in similar situations, I would have come forward much earlier.”

 

Having the courage to go to the police put an end to her father’s abuse forever. Her story is one of survival – and telling it is an extraordinary act of generosity and a signal to victims that sharing their truth can set them free.

 

If you or someone you know is experiencing sexual abuse or family violence contact: National Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence Counselling Service 24-hour helpline 1800 RESPECT on 1800 737 732

 

https://www.1800respect.org.au/

 

Kids Helpline is for young people aged 5 to 25 on 1800 551 800

 

https://kidshelpline.com.au/

 

Don’t go it alone. Please reach out for help by contacting Lifeline on 13 11 14

 

https://www.lifeline.org.au/

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/weekend-australian-magazine/is-your-father-your-abuser-breaking-free-of-the-shame-of-decades-of-sexual-abuse/news-story/65c95162e080a33c61fb54886f402b28

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 1, 2025, 2:07 a.m. No.23106959   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1511 >>1526 >>1593 >>2209

>>23103570

>>23103619

‘We’ll determine our defence policy’: PM pushes back on Hegseth pressure over China

 

Lisa Visentin - June 1, 2025

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has pushed back on US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s calls for Australia to ramp up its defence spending to counter China’s growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region.

 

Hegseth made the request to Defence Minister Richard Marles when the pair met on Friday on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore, where the US defence chief later delivered a strident speech warning China posed a real and potentially imminent threat to the region.

 

But on Sunday, Albanese defended Australia’s defence spending and policy settings when asked about Hegseth’s remarks, and whether Australia would lift its defence budget to 3 per cent of gross domestic product – the figure the Trump administration has previously nominated.

 

“What we’ll do is we’ll determine our defence policy, and we’ve invested just across the forward [estimates], an additional $10 billion in defence. What we’ll do is continue to provide for investing in our capability but also investing in our relationships in the region,” Albanese said at a press conference in Tasmania.

 

“Our position with regard to Taiwan is very clear, has been for a long period of time, which is a bipartisan position to support the status quo.”

 

The prime minister’s comments on defence spending contrast with those made by Marles, who has also defended the government’s investment but has said that Australia was “absolutely up for having this conversation” with the US about increasing it further.

 

Hegseth’s speech at the dialogue, delivered to an audience of top defence officials on Saturday, has also provoked a furious response from China, which said he had “smeared and attacked China”. It accused the US of being the “biggest factor undermining peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific region”.

 

“The United States has deployed offensive weapons in the South China Sea, fanned the flames and created tensions in the Asia-Pacific region, turning the Asia-Pacific region into a ‘powder keg’, causing deep concern among regional countries,” China’s foreign ministry said in a statement.

 

China warned the US it should “not play with fire” over the Taiwan issue, taking aim at Hegseth’s comments that any attempt by China to conquer Taiwan “would result in devastating consequences”.

 

China claims Taiwan – a self-governing democracy – as its own territory, despite the Chinese Communist Party never having controlled the island.

 

In his speech, the first major declaration of the Trump administration’s Indo-Pacific policy, Hegseth said the US would not instigate conflict with China or seek regime change but if deterrence failed, the US was prepared to “fight and win decisively”.

 

“There’s no reason to sugar-coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,” Hegseth said.

 

Marles, who endorsed Hegseth’s speech as a clear articulation of American intent to seek peace through strength, rejected China’s assertions that US policy was destabilising the region.

 

“We have worked with the United States and other countries in the region over a long period of time to uphold the global rules to see that the way in which countries engage with each other is not based on a question of might and power, but rather on the basis of law and rules,” Marles said on Sunday.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/world/asia/we-ll-determine-our-defence-policy-pm-pushes-back-on-hegseth-pressure-over-china-20250601-p5m3xo.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 1, 2025, 2:12 a.m. No.23106961   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0675 >>4204 >>4780 >>5659 >>8064 >>3835 >>2210

>>23094571

>>23103541

Albanese urged to confront Trump in person after doubling down on tariffs

 

Paul Sakkal - June 1, 2025

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has condemned Donald Trump’s latest tariff salvo on Australian metals, describing it as reckless as the opposition urged Albanese to confront the US president about the trade strikes during a coming meeting.

 

On Saturday, Trump said he would double tariffs on steel and aluminium imports to 50 per cent, days after the Court of International Trade found Trump had overstepped his authority to enact a baseline 10 per cent blanket tariff on all types of goods.

 

The steel and aluminium tariffs were underpinned by a different set of laws to the 10 per cent across-the-board tariff, meaning Australia must secure an exemption to get out of it.

 

The US eliminated tariffs on British steel and aluminium in a deal with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in May, creating a precedent for Australia to strike a similar agreement when Albanese and Trump meet for the first time this month. They are expected to meet either on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada or during a trip to the US.

 

Speaking in Hobart on Sunday, Albanese said the new trade barrier, which will affect about $1 billion worth of Australian metal exports, represented an “inappropriate action by the Trump Administration”.

 

“This is an act of economic self-harm by the United States that will increase the cost for consumers in the United States,” he said, echoing the language he used after Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs.

 

“Because it is [applied] across the board, what it will do is not create any comparative advantage or disadvantage for Australia compared with other countries that export into the United States. This is something that will just increase the cost for consumers in the United States.”

 

Opposition finance spokesman James Paterson said Trump’s move was a blow to Australia. He added that he agreed with the comments of Labor ministers on the subject, appearing to break from previous Coalition leader Peter Dutton’s tactic of claiming the opposition could secure a better deal from Trump.

 

Paterson urged Albanese to be “respectful but assertive” when he met Trump.

 

“This is not consistent with the US-Australia free trade agreement,” he said on Sky News. “He’s got to robustly stand up for Australia’s national interest.”

 

Paterson said it was critical for Australia to help preserve global trading rules because, as a small national reliant on trade, they were key to Australia’s prosperity.

 

America enjoys a trade surplus with Australia, making it one of the few countries where it sells more than the other nation buys. The US sold $US17.9 billion ($27.8 billion) more goods to Australia in 2024.

 

Australia exported $640 million worth of steel and $440 million worth of aluminium last year to the US. The cumulative $1 billion worth of metals trade is a small amount compared with the nation’s total exports of $660 billion in the past financial year.

 

Trump announced the doubling of steel and aluminium tariffs during a visit to the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, headquarters of US Steel, in front of a crowd of workers in high-vis vests and hardhats.

 

“At 25 per cent they can sort of get over that fence. At 50 per cent they can no longer get over the fence,” Trump said. “Nobody’s going to get around that … Nobody’s going to be able to steal your industry.”

 

The steel and aluminium tariffs were enacted under trade laws rather than the emergency powers Trump used to levy a 10 per cent across-the-board tariff. The Court of International Trade last week found that Trump had overstepped his authority on the baseline 10 per cent tariff, but those tariffs will remain in place for now after a federal appeals court agreed to temporarily preserve them while the Trump administration pursued an appeal.

 

The matter is likely to be decided by the US Supreme Court.

 

Employment and Workplace Relations Minister Amanda Rishworth called the doubling of metal tariffs “unjustifiable”.

 

“This continues to be a difficult area, but one that we will throw everything at,” she told Sky News.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-doubles-down-on-trump-over-tariff-spike-now-he-s-urged-to-confront-him-face-to-face-20250601-p5m3wq.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 2, 2025, 2:27 a.m. No.23111511   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1517 >>1526 >>1593 >>1605 >>2210

>>23103570

>>23103619

>>23106959

US asked Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP

 

JOE KELLY - 2 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Australia has been asked to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP “as soon as possible,” with the request being relayed directly from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore.

 

This is a major increase on the current levels of defence spending and would require the government to pour many tens of billions of extra money into the defence budget.

 

It is also a significant step-up on the three per cent of GDP that US Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, Elbridge Colby, had signalled was needed in his nomination hearing in March.

 

The American readout of the meeting between Mr Hegseth and Mr Marles, who is also the Australian Defence Minister, stated that the two men “discussed aligning investment to the security environment in the Indo-Pacific, accelerating US force posture initiatives in Australia, advancing defence industrial base co-operation, and creating supply chain resilience.”

 

However, it also noted that, “on defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible.”

 

The US is pushing its allies and partners across the world to contribute more to their own defence rather than seeking to free ride on the American defence shield and nuclear umbrella.

 

Mr Marles previously acknowledged that Mr Hegseth had urged Australia to increase defence spending following their meeting late last week. But he did not disclose the exact increase requested by his US counterpart.

 

“On Friday, in our bilateral meeting, Secretary Hegseth did raise the question of increased defence expenditure on the Australian side,” Mr Marles said on Sunday. “Of course, we have already engaged in the last couple of years in the single biggest peace time increase in defence expenditure in Australia’s history. So we are beginning this journey.”

 

“We will continue to have the conversation with the United States, and we understand and we’re up for it.”

 

However, Mr Albanese provided a different message on Sunday. Asked about whether Australia would increase defence spending to 3 per cent - a figure less than the 3.5 per cent requested by Mr Hegseth - the Prime Minister said: “What we’ll do is we’ll determine our defence policy. And we’ve invested just across the forwards, an additional $10 billion in defence.”

 

“What we’ll do is continue to do is continue to provide for investing in our capability but also investing in our relationships in the region.”

 

Mr Albanese is expected to meet with Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit, hosted by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney from June 15-17, where he may be asked directly to lift defence spending as a percentage of GDP to the new 3.5 per cent threshold nominated by Mr Hegseth.

 

Professor of International Security and Intelligence Studies at ANU, John Blaxland, told The Australian the demand presented a “bit of a challenge” for Mr Albanese to “actually navigate these very tricky shoals between the domestic imperative not to be seen to be too supportive of Trump’s initiatives because of the left of the Labor Party and the concerns there and, at the same time, to be sufficiently supportive of the US alliance and the US ambitions for Asia that it keeps the United States sufficiently satisfied.”

 

“It’s the goldilocks solution if you like - to look like you are not caving. But, in the White House, you look like you are a team player.”

 

Professor Blaxland suspected it would be untenable for the government to do nothing and would likely need make a consequential defence announcement at the time of Mr Albanese’s meeting with Mr Trump.

 

“They are going to have to look like they are going further than they would have,” he said.

 

He suggested the government might be considering putting another “half a billion on the table for AUKUS and perhaps (doing) more on critical minerals.”

 

“Perhaps additional business investment in the United States and perhaps some more money up front on Australian defence. That’s going to be challenging for him (Mr Albanese) to pull off.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 2, 2025, 2:29 a.m. No.23111517   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23111511

 

2/2

 

Strategic Analysis Australia ­director Peter Jennings, a former Defence Department deputy secretary, said that the US President would likely “press Albanese to lift ­defence spending”.

 

“Defence spending is currently 2.05 per cent of gross domestic product, on a languid path to reach 2.4 per cent in eight years,” he said. “No one outside of government (and in fact, not many inside government) believes that is an ­adequate response to our strategic situation.”

 

In the Pentagon readout of the meeting between Mr Hegseth and Mr Marles, the US “welcomed the conclusion of the Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) Memorandum of Understanding on Production, Sustainment, and Follow-On Development – the Department’s first long range fire co-operation on foreign soil.”

 

It also said that Mr Hegseth looked “forward to continuing to work with DPM Marles to maintain peace through strength in the Indo-Pacific.”

 

In his speech to the Shangri-La Dialogue, Mr Hegseth said the Indo-Pacific was America’s “priority theatre” and that the US would work with allies and our partners to “preserve the global and regional peace that we all hold dear.”

 

He said the US position in the region would be underpinned by the restoration of the warrior ethos, a dedicated effort to rebuild the American military and an urgent mission to re-establish deterrence.

 

“We are reorienting toward deterring aggression by Communist China,” he said. “Here in the Indo-Pacific, our futures are bound together … And we are here to stay.”

 

While the US did not seek a conflict with Beijing, Mr Hegseth said that “China’s behaviour towards its neighbours and the world is a wake-up call. And an urgent one.”

 

China was “credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific. We know. It’s public that Xi has ordered his military to be capable of invading Taiwan by 2027.”

 

He said that “if deterrence fails, and if called upon by my Commander in Chief, we are prepared to do what the Department of Defence does best – fight and win — decisively.”

 

Mr Hegseth said that America’s allies in Asia should now “look to countries in Europe as a new-found example” on defence spending.

 

”NATO members are pledging to spend 5 per cent of their GDP on defence, even Germany. So it doesn’t make sense for countries in Europe to do that while key allies in Asia spend less on defence in the face of an even more formidable threat,” he said.

 

“I urge all our allies and partners to seize this moment with us. Our defence spending must reflect the dangers and threats that we face today. Because deterrence doesn’t come on the cheap, just ask the American taxpayer.”

 

A recent report by the Australian Strategic Policy Institute on the “Cost of Defence” found that Labor’s “business as usual” defence budget was hollowing out the force, leaving it with limited munitions stockpiles and a shortage of critical capabilities including missile defence systems and long-range weapons.

 

The recent budget left defence spending hovering at about 2 per cent of GDP, with the ASPI report saying the “slow pace” of procuring key systems “risks leaving the ADF ill-prepared for current threats and unable to keep pace with future challenges, ­creating a ‘no man’s land’ of preparedness”.

 

It said other Indo-Pacific ­nations were rearming “much faster than us”.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/us-asked-australia-to-lift-defence-spending-to-35-per-cent-of-gdp/news-story/0083e331e6e246d564dcdccd4da0c43e

 

https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/4202734/readout-of-secretary-of-defense-pete-hegseths-bilateral-meeting-with-australia/

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-02/us-australia-defence-spend-billions-hegseth-china/105364740

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 2, 2025, 2:35 a.m. No.23111526   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2211

>>23103570

>>23106959

>>23111511

Albanese government must decide how to respond to Trump call on defence spending

 

CAMERON STEWART - 2 June 2025

 

After being spectacularly called out by the Trump administration over its go-slow increase in defence spending, the Albanese government now faces a dilemma of its own making about how to respond.

 

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has deliberately provoked Australia by publicly stating the Trump administration wants a dramatic increase in spending from 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent.

 

Hegseth did not need to reveal this request publicly, but chose to do so in order to increase pressure on Australia to lift its contribution to regional and global security.

 

Indeed Defence Minister Richard Marles tried to hide the specifics of their meeting in Singapore by failing to mention the 3.5 per cent figure to Australian media.

 

Why was Marles so shy? Because it now puts the Albanese government in a very awkward spot – a spot for which it alone is responsible.

 

If the government rushes to increase defence spending now, it risks being seen as a lackey of Trump and would make a lie of Albanese’s insistence that “we’ll determine our defence policy”.

 

Yet to do nothing and completely ignore the requests of our closest ally – a country which is asking all of its allies to step up around the world – makes Australia appear like a laggard on collective global security at a time of grave strategic uncertainty.

 

Such a vocal call-out by the Trump administration would not have been necessary if the government had done the right thing before the election and pledged a meaningful increase in defence spending.

 

The government knows that Australia faces the worst strategic circumstances in generations – because it says so itself – and it knew that Trump was berating his European allies for not spending more on defence.

 

So the right thing to do was to be proactive and announce a sizeable long-term commitment to higher defence spending before Trump called for it.

 

Labor strategists will say smugly that they won the election in a canter so they were right in their judgment that there was no public clamour to lift defence spending beyond current commitments.

 

But doing what’s right for national security isn’t always about what polls or focus groups think.

 

A grown-up government puts national interests ahead of its own budget handouts and short-term political strategy.

 

The best model for how Australia should respond now is British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who this year responded to what he calls a “generational” challenge to security by pledging to lift Britain’s defence spending from 2.3 per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent in just two years with a “clear ambition” to lift it to 3 per cent of GDP after the next election.

 

There is no reason why Australia cannot commit to lifting defence spending sharply from its current 2.02 per cent of GDP to 2.5 per cent by the end of the decade with an aspiration to raise it to 3 per cent in the 2030s.

 

This would be a meaningful increase and one which will be needed anyway to pay for the eye-watering costs of the AUKUS pact fleet of nuclear-powered submarines.

 

Almost every serious national security commentator in the country says 3 per cent is necessary to meet the challenge of a rising China and to pay for the future defence force which the government has promised.

 

Hegseth’s proposed level of 3.5 per cent of GDP is probably a stretch too far – it is unlikely to happen in peacetime Australia without a fundamental rethinking of the social compact of government. But there is no reason why the government cannot work towards the still-ambitious 3 per cent target.

 

The government boasts about how it is injecting $10bn in new money into defence over the next decade to lift defence spending from around 2 per cent to 2.3 per cent in 2033-34.

 

But this is sleepwalking compared to much of the rest of the Western world and is still below almost all of its like-minded European counterparts from Britain (2.3) to Poland (4.1), Greece (3.1), Denmark and Finland (2.4). Norway, Sweden, Turkey and France all spend more than Australia now does on defence as a proportion of GDP.

 

The Prime Minister appears frustrated by the pressure from the US and is so far downplaying its significance.

 

But the government knows it needs to step up its defence spending, not just because of Trump, but because of the growing shadow being cast by China.

 

This government almost certainly has six years left in power – now is the time to do the right thing, not just the easy thing, on defence and security.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/albanese-government-must-decide-how-to-respond-to-trump-call-on-defence-spending/news-story/ae9dd0f4687930e1667de92268f6bfe0

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybPlzVulyBs

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 2, 2025, 3:12 a.m. No.23111593   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1596 >>1605 >>5940 >>2211

>>23103570

>>23106959

>>23111511

Taiwan tipping point as US-Australia forces prepare for war

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 1 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Australia and the US have ­elevated military exercises and ­security agency co-operation to a war footing amid China’s unprecedented armed forces build-up in the Indo-Pacific and fears Xi ­Jinping could imminently move to invade Taiwan, triggering a major global conflict.

 

Ahead of Anthony Albanese’s first in-person meeting with ­Donald Trump at the G7 summit in Canada, relations between Washington and Beijing sank to a new low on the weekend amid rising tensions between the superpowers over military expansion, Taiwan and trade tariffs.

 

The new flashpoint in US-China relations was sparked when US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned Beijing was preparing to potentially use military force to “alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific” and that Mr Xi had ordered his armed forces to be capable of invading Taiwan by 2027.

 

Mr Hegseth’s speech, at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, which was immediately ­attacked by Chinese officials who cautioned the US to not “play with fire” on Taiwan, came amid an ongoing build up of American military personnel in Australia.

 

The US has been strengthening its military presence in northern Australia and enhancing collaboration with Australian defence and security agencies as it prepares for the prospect of regional conflict with China. With close to 2500 marines rotating through the Northern Territory, the US military presence in Australia has hit its highest levels since the end of World War II.

 

Revealing Australia has locked in agreements with the US on ­ammunition, rockets and guided weapons, Mr Hegseth said the US Army would soon conduct “its first live-fire test of its mid-range capability system in Australia”.

 

“This will be the first time that system is fired west of the Inter­national Date Line, the first time it’s been tested on foreign soil. ­Deployments like this represent a commitment to the region, and there are many more planned,” Mr Hegseth said.

 

More than 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations will participate in the 11th Exercise Talisman Sabre, led by Australia and the US, from July 13 to August 4. The largest ever Talisman Sabre will be staged at sites in Australia and, for the first time, Papua New Guinea, consisting of live-fire and field training exercises, force preparation activities, amphibious landings, ground force manoeuvres, air combat and maritime operations.

 

In a new report titled The World According to Xi Jinping, Lowy Institute China expert Richard McGregor said “a confrontation with Washington could happen quickly or in slow motion”.

 

“So long as Xi remains in power and the United States maintains a significant military presence in Asia, ever intensifying competition is on the cards,” he wrote.

 

As relations between Mr Trump and Mr Xi sour, Mr Albanese will be forced to balance Australia’s security relationship with the US and economic ties with China when he meets the US President on the sidelines of the G7 summit, hosted by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney from June 15-17.

 

The Prime Minister’s meeting with Mr Trump is expected to focus on geostrategic and security challenges posed by China, defence spending, critical minerals and tariffs.

 

Mr Albanese, who has forged closer ties with Mr Xi since winning the 2022 election and secured the removal of Chinese trade bans on local products, on Sunday said Australia’s position on Taiwan had not changed.

 

“Our position with regard to Taiwan is very clear, has been for a long period of time, which is a ­bipartisan position to support the status quo,” Mr Albanese said.

 

After Mr Hegseth last week ­directly urged Defence Minister Richard Marles to boost Australia’s defence budget, Mr Albanese said “we’ll determine our defence policy and we’ve invested across the forwards an additional $10bn in defence”.

 

Strategic Analysis Australia ­director Peter Jennings, a former Defence Department deputy secretary, said Mr Trump would ­likely “press Albanese to lift ­defence spending”.

 

“Defence spending is currently 2.05 per cent of gross domestic product, on a languid path to reach 2.4 per cent in eight years. No one outside of government (and in fact, not many inside government) believes that is an ­adequate response to our strategic situation,” Mr Jennings said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 2, 2025, 3:14 a.m. No.23111596   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23111593

 

2/2

 

In a provocative show of force ahead of the May 3 election, Chinese warships circumnavigated Australia and conducted live-fire exercises in the Tasman Sea without warning, while a spy ship lurked off the coast.

 

Mr Marles on Sunday said “what we have seen from China is the single-biggest increase in military capability and build-up … by any country since the end of the Second World War”.

 

“And it’s not just the size of the military build-up, it’s the fact that it is happening without strategic reassurance. It’s happening without a clear strategic intent on the part of China,” Mr Marles said.

 

After gaining access to US Marine Corps operations in Australia, CBS News last week reported on joint exercises with Australian and Japanese troops conducted as part of preparations against Chinese aggression.

 

Brigadier Ben McLennan, commander of the Australian Defence Force 3rd Brigade, told CBS News they were preparing for the worst possible outcome.

 

“Every time you commit to an exercise like this, it is a rehearsal – and you treat it as your last opportunity to do so before war arrives. A rehearsal for a war the likes of which we haven’t seen since the Second World War,” he said.

 

Mr Hegseth used his Shangri-La Dialogue speech to amplify risks posed by the Chinese Communist Party regime and growing military co-operation with allies including Australia.

 

“It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific. We know. It’s public that Xi has ordered his military to be capable of invading Taiwan by 2027,” he said.

 

“The PLA is building the military needed to do it. Training for it every day. And rehearsing for the real deal.

 

“To be clear: any attempt by communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world. There’s no reason to sugarcoat it. The threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.”

 

In response to Mr Hegseth, a Chinese foreign affairs ministry spokesperson said “the US should never imagine it could use the Taiwan question as leverage against China”.

 

“The Taiwan question is ­entirely China’s internal affair. The US must never play with fire on this question. China urges the US to fully abide by the one-China principle,” the Chinese ­official said.

 

Chinese authorities last month attacked Australia for trying to create “trouble” following joint military exercises in the South China Sea conducted alongside the US and Philippines.

 

In February, the Royal Australian Navy, US Navy and the British Royal Navy conducted exercises in the South China Sea to “strengthen collaboration at sea” between the AUKUS partners. Australian, US and Japanese defence personnel in December ran Exercise Yama Sakura at sites in all three countries, which involved 6800 troops.

 

Mr Marles and Mr Hegseth on Saturday held trilateral talks with Japanese Defence Minister Nakatani Gen in Singapore to discuss the “severe and complex ­security environment in the Indo-Pacific and the importance of the Australia-Japan-United States partnership to maintain and ­reinforce a free and open Indo-Pacific”.

 

Ahead of Mr Albanese meeting Japan Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba in Canada, a Japanese Mogami-class frigate will berth at HMAS Coonawarra Naval Base on Thursday for a three-day stop.

 

The Japanese government is pushing hard for Australia to buy $10bn worth of new Mogami frigates and position its shipbuilder Mitsubishi Heavy Industries as the firm favourite in the contest with Germany’s ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems.

 

The Albanese government will make a final decision on its SEA3000 general purpose frigate tender later this year. The plan involves the purchase of 11 frigates, with the first three built offshore and the remainder at Henderson in Perth.

 

In his Lowy Institute special feature, Mr McGregor said Mr Trump’s return to the White House would likely harden China’s foreign policy and military ambitions.

 

“China will keep investing heavily in technology to gain leverage over the US and its allies, both in industry and the military. It will continue to try to marginalise Washington, particularly in Asia,” he wrote.

 

“Relations with Vladimir Putin’s Russia will be strengthened. The focus on building alternative global power centres among emerging middle powers and developing countries will be accelerated.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/taiwan-tipping-point-as-xi-muscles-up-to-trump/news-story/f234dbb979e07001e9594ee1ccfdc311

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 2, 2025, 3:25 a.m. No.23111605   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5940 >>6853 >>2213

>>23103570

>>23111511

>>23111593

Talisman Sabre 2025: United Kingdom’s flagship carrier HMS Prince of Wales leads Strike Group heading to Darwin

 

Gary Shipway - June 1, 2025

 

A powerful British Carrier Strike Group is heading to Darwin.

 

The Strike Group is led by the United Kingdom’s flagship carrier HMS Prince of Wales and will be accompanied by the Royal Navy’s destroyer HMS Dauntless and frigate HMS Richmond. It will be the first time since in almost two decades that a British carrier will visit Australia.

 

Australian Minister for Defence Industry and Pacific Island Affairs Pat Conroy confirmed the Carrier Strike group’s Darwin visit and its participation in Exercise Talisman Sabre.

 

The Queen Elizabeth Class aircraft carrier is on an eight month overseas mission and is carrying up to two dozen Lockheed Martin F-35B Lightning II aircraft, including 809 Naval Air Squadron (NAS) “Immortals” and Royal Air Force (RAF) 617 Squadron “The Dambusters.” Nine Merlin anti-submarine warfare (ASW) helicopters from 820 NAS are also aboard, with three are designed for Airborne and Control (ASaC) operations.

 

The announcement also coincides with Defence Minister Richard Marles statements in Singapore at the weekend backing a call from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for America’s allies in the Asia-Pacific to do more to contribute to regional security, in part to counter China’s rapid military build-up.

 

In an address to the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Mr Hegseth said the threat posed by China to the region’s balance of power was real.

 

Defence Minister Richard Marles said Australia cannot rely on the United States alone to counter China’s military strength in the Indo-Pacific.

 

The UK Minister for Defence Procurement and Industry Maria Eagle at Fleet Base East who flew to Sydney in Sydney to review Australia–UK defence industry and capability collaboration and explore new opportunities said Britain is looking forward to Exercise Talisman Sabre.

 

“It’s just one more example of our defence co-operation,” Minister Eagle said.

 

“For the first time since 1997, a UK carrier, the HMS Prince of Wales will visit Australia docking in Darwin, and in the face of increasing global threats, the UK and Australia remain the greatest of friends, and among the closest of defence partners.”

 

Minister Conroy said Australia and the United Kingdom stand shoulder to shoulder against challenges to the rules-based global order.

 

“We’re very excited to see the carrier strike group in Australian waters.”

 

Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 has 19 nations taking part.

 

It is a large-scale, multinational military exercise hosted by Australia.

 

It will be the eleventh iteration of the exercise and will focus on multi-domain war fighting, including land, air, sea, space, and cyber domains.

 

The exercise will involve more than 30,000 personnel and will take place from July 13 to August 4, 2025.

 

For the first time, Talisman Sabre 2025 will include activities in Papua New Guinea, in addition to areas across Australia.

 

https://www.ntnews.com.au/news/united-kingdoms-flagship-carrier-hms-prince-of-wales-leads-strike-group-heading-to-darwin/news-story/e5516025f1bd4a54d59dee848fefa2ee

 

https://www.defence.gov.au/news-events/releases/2025-04-23/exercise-talisman-sabre-2025

 

 

''Talisman Sabre.''

 

Magic Sword.

 

https://''www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw''

 

https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists

 

https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=Talisman+Sabre

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 3, 2025, 3:04 a.m. No.23115808   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5809 >>5822 >>5832 >>2213

>>23035918

>>23035926

Greens aghast as Dorinda Cox jumps ship to Labor

 

PAUL GARVEY and SARAH ISON - 3 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Dorinda Cox’s shock defection from the Greens to Labor has blindsided her former colleagues and angered ex-staffers who had complained of bullying during their time in her office.

 

Senator Cox appeared alongside Anthony Albanese at Perth’s Kings Park on Monday just over an hour after she called Greens leader Larissa Waters to inform her of her decision.

 

The West Australian senator’s defection followed months of internal conflict within the Greens over Senator Cox, the failure of her bid to become deputy leader in the wake of last month’s dismal election showing, and the growing realisation that she was not going to be preselected in a winnable position on the party’s next Senate ticket.

 

Several former staffers to Senator Cox came forward last year with claims that they had been bullied by the senator and had ­endured a toxic workplace environment marred by extremely high levels of staff turnover.

 

While her parliamentary colleagues had been broadly supportive of the senator in the wake of last year’s bullying allegations, many of the rank-and-file Greens members in Western Australia are understood to have seen things very differently.

 

She had also long ago lost the support of the party’s Indigenous faction, the Blak Greens, and many prominent members of the Indigenous community. Senator Cox had a fractious relationship with another Greens Senate ­defector, Lidia Thorpe, and had been concerned about reports – denied by Senator Thorpe – that her rival still had influence over the Greens.

 

Asked about the bullying ­allegations against Senator Cox, the Prime Minister said he was comfortable that those complaints had been adequately ­addressed.

 

“We examined everything that had been considered in the past. Those issues were dealt with appropriately,” he said.

 

“My government has established very clear guidelines, meaning that any issues relating to workplaces and making sure that workplaces are safe are properly examined. They were all dealt with in Senator Cox’s case and dealt with appropriately.”

 

The news of Senator Cox’s ­defection triggered anger among some of those former staffers who had previously complained about her behaviour.

 

One former staffer said that while it was not surprising to see Senator Cox part ways with the Greens, it was “shocking” to see her accepted into the Labor fold by Mr Albanese.

 

“It is disturbing that Labor and the Prime Minister would welcome into their party someone with such a history of alleged bullying,” one former staffer said.

 

The defection comes just weeks after Senator Cox missed out on the deputy leadership of the Greens, and just days after the Albanese government gave provisional approval to extend the life of Woodside Energy’s North West Shelf gas plant out to 2070.

 

Senator Cox had previously been vehemently opposed to the North West Shelf extension. She told The Australian in the lead-up to the election – when many pundits were pointing to a likely minority Labor government – that the Greens would “absolutely be taking Labor to task” on the North West Shelf if the Greens emerged with the balance of power in the lower house.

 

Asked about her position on the North West Shelf given her shift in allegiance, Senator Cox said it would not be appropriate for her to comment given the conditional approval given by Environment Minister Murray Watt last week was only provisional.

 

“My understanding is that Woodside do need to come back to Minister Watt. And obviously, I will be working with the Labor government now to ensure that we tread a pathway forward in ensuring that there’s a delivery of what’s required for the Australian public, particularly for the West Australian public, and to make sure that we are doing that in partnership with them,” she said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 3, 2025, 3:06 a.m. No.23115809   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23115808

 

2/2

 

The senator had put her name forward for the deputy leadership of the Greens last month after former leader Adam Bandt lost his seat, but missed out to incumbent Mehreen Faruqi.

 

Senator Waters slammed Senator Cox after announcing she would defect to Labor, questioning how the WA senator’s values could truly align with a party that last week approved the North West Shelf gas project. The newly elected Greens leader said Senator Cox had advised her of her decision just an “hour prior” to her announcement that she would join the Labor Party.

 

“The Greens are disappointed in Senator Cox’s decision to leave the Greens and join the Labor party as a backbencher,” Senator Waters said. “Senator Cox has said that her values align with the Labor Party. This is the same Labor Party who this week approved the climate wrecking North West Shelf gas project, which UNESCO advises will destroy significant First Nations heritage and ancient rock art.”

 

Senator Waters said Senator Cox would have had “more chance of effecting change by continuing to work with the Greens in the sole balance of power”.

 

“The Greens are committed to continuing to work for Truth, Treaty and Justice with First Nations people and will continue to work to protect country and the climate that is under such threat from Labor Party decisions in Western Australia,” she said. “We wish her well.”

 

Senator Cox had herself been a Labor member long before she joined the Greens. Mr Albanese said he had “engaged very constructively” with Senator Cox after she had approached Labor a few days ago. “Dorinda and I have had more discussions in recent days than we had in previous years, and that’s the nature of the Senate and the House of Representatives,” Mr Albanese said.

 

“Senator Cox didn’t ask for anything, just asked for this to be considered. The national executive committee of the Labor Party met yesterday afternoon (Sunday) and Senator Cox will be admitted to the Labor Party as a member tomorrow (Tuesday) to the Western Australian branch.”

 

Senator Cox’s defection further diminishes the Greens’ parliamentary numbers, although Labor will continue to rely on the minor party to help pass legislation through the Senate.

 

Monash head of politics and international relations Zareh Ghazarian said “things seem to be getting worse for the Greens”, noting it would be “particularly galling” for the minor party to lose a senator to Labor.

 

“Senator Dorinda Cox’s decision will mean Labor has gained one more seat in the Senate, but will still need to negotiate with the other senators or the Greens to get a majority vote in the chamber,“ she said.

 

Senator Cox told The Australian in 2023 that her father had always encouraged her to vote for Labor, and that she had joined the party for a brief period in her late 20s to progress First Nations rights. “I gave them the benefit of the doubt. I paid my membership, went to one branch meeting and the local member didn’t even ­acknowledge me – and I just thought, this is not for me,” she said. Following a career in the police force and business consulting, Senator Cox was selected to replace WA Greens senator ­Rachel Siewert in 2021.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/greens-aghast-as-dorinda-cox-jumps-ship-to-labor/news-story/87a2935261813892e764461dd358d332

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VLJTXIsBFSo

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 3, 2025, 3:16 a.m. No.23115822   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5824 >>5832 >>2213

>>23115808

‘All dealt with’: Albanese defends Greens defector after bullying allegations

 

Paul Sakkal and James Massola - June 3, 2025

 

1/2

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese insists bullying complaints against West Australian senator Dorinda Cox were dealt with appropriately as he hailed her shock defection from the Greens to join his government.

 

The move represents a body blow to the Greens, which lost three of its four lower house seats, including that of former leader Adam Bandt, at the election but had held its ground in the Senate.

 

Cox said she only informed new Greens leader Larissa Waters of her decision 90 minutes before Albanese held an afternoon press conference with Cox in Perth on Monday before a cabinet meeting in the state on Tuesday.

 

“I have reached a conclusion after deep and careful reflection that my values and priorities are more aligned with Labor than the Greens,” Cox said. “I’ve worked hard to make Australia fairer and much more reconciled. But recently, I’ve lost some confidence in the capacity for the Greens to assist me in being able to progress this.”

 

The senator, who has three years left on her term in parliament, was facing the prospect of losing the number one spot on the Greens’ Western Australian Senate ticket, after this masthead revealed Cox had lost 20 staff in three years.

 

Five lodged some form of complaint with the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service, while several lodged complaints with the leader’s office and with the WA branch of the Greens. In November, this masthead reported that parliament’s support service wound up its involvement without informing complainants of a resolution.

 

Cox has consistently denied the claims and argued they lacked context but apologised for any distress felt by her staff during a period when her office was dealing with the pandemic, then the Voice referendum, multiple parliamentary inquiries and a large geographic area.

 

Cox said at the time that she took responsibility “for any shortcomings in what has occurred during this period”.

 

Albanese said the problems had been addressed. “We examined everything that had been considered in the past. Those issues were dealt with appropriately. My government has established very clear guidelines,” Albanese said. “They were all dealt with in Senator Cox’s case and dealt with appropriately.”

 

Albanese appeared chuffed with the rare defection and said Cox approached Labor and had not asked for anything in return.

 

“[What] struck me as we were sitting down having a discussion about this, that the reason why Dorinda has made this decision is the same reason why all those years ago, as a very young man, I made a decision to join the Labor Party,” he said.

 

“You want to make a difference, that the way that you make a difference is by being a member of a party of government, that the values that Dorinda has are perfectly consistent with the values of the Labor Party.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 3, 2025, 3:17 a.m. No.23115824   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23115822

 

2/2

 

Cox’s defection does not significantly shift power in the Senate. It means the Greens have 10 senators and Labor 29, meaning the government still requires Greens support if the Coalition is opposed to a bill.

 

Waters said she was disappointed by Cox’s departure and argued she would have had more influence staying with the minor party and exercising the balance of power in the Senate.

 

“Senator Cox has said that her values align with the Labor Party,” Waters said in a statement. “This is the same Labor Party who this week approved the climate-wrecking North West Shelf gas project, which UNESCO advises will destroy significant First Nations heritage and ancient rock art.

 

“The Greens are committed to continuing to work for Truth, Treaty and Justice with First Nations people and will continue to work to protect Country and the climate that is under such threat from Labor Party decisions in Western Australia.”

 

Cox, an Indigenous woman and former police officer, was viewed as one of the more moderate voices in the Greens.

 

Cox was a Labor Party member before she joined the Greens and is close friends with Marcus Stewart, the inaugural co-chair of Victoria’s First Peoples’ Assembly and husband of Victorian Labor senator Jana Stewart.

 

One Labor MP, who asked not to be named, said the Greens had not guaranteed that Cox would gain a winnable Senate spot next election.

 

Cox is the second Indigenous senator to quit the Greens in recent years after Victorian senator Lidia Thorpe moved to the crossbench because she did not support a Voice to parliament.

 

Albanese played a key role in bringing Cox across to Labor, much as he helped convince former Coalition MP Peter Slipper to become an independent speaker in 2012.

 

After being approached by Cox, Labor proceeded cautiously, with the prime minister consulting the party’s Indigenous MPs, including Malarndirri McCarthy, Marion Scrymgour, Gordon Reid and Jana Stewart.

 

The leadership group, including Penny Wong, Katy Gallagher, Don Farrell and Richard Marles, also discussed the potential defection. It was signed off by the party’s national executive at a meeting on Sunday.

 

Even as the number of people who knew about the stunning defection grew in recent days, the news did not leak before Albanese’s announcement on Monday.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/greens-senator-dorinda-cox-makes-shock-switch-to-labor-20250602-p5m4aq.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 3, 2025, 3:22 a.m. No.23115832   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5836 >>2216

>>23115808

>>23115822

Bullying complaints against Labor’s Dorinda Cox ‘not over’

 

PAUL GARVEY and SARAH ISON - 3 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Indigenous and Jewish leaders have questioned Dorinda Cox’s decision to defect from the Greens to Labor, with one of the senator’s former staffers warning that bullying allegations against the senator are not settled.

 

Senator Cox made the shock announcement of her move to Labor on Monday, just weeks after she missed out on the deputy leadership of the Greens. She said her switch – which also came days after Environment Minister Murray Watt approved the North West Shelf gas extension she had opposed – showed that her “values and priorities are more aligned with Labor”.

 

The West Australian senator looked increasingly unlikely to secure a winnable spot on the Greens’ next Senate ticket amid tensions between her and party members. Senator Cox last year apologised after multiple staff came forward with allegations that they had been bullied during their time in her office, and many grassroots Greens members and the Blak Greens faction are angry about what they see as a lack of action from the top of the party in response to those complaints.

 

Anthony Albanese on Monday said the allegations had been “dealt with” through the appropriate channels.

 

One of the complainants against the senator, Esther Montgomery, told The Australian on Tuesday that she had “no doubt” that her decision to join Labor would ultimately end in tears for the Albanese government.

 

“Dorinda Cox is a creature of habit. She’s a bully by nature, and it’s going to be very, very interesting, the dynamics within the party,” she said.

 

Ms Montgomery, an Indigenous elder and veteran activist, spent a “nightmare” two months employed in Senator Cox’s office and went public with her complaints last year. She said no one from the government had made contact with her or other former staffers who had spoken out.

 

While the Parliamentary Workplace Support Service – the independent body set up to address workplace issues in the federal parliament – has investigated the complaints against the senator, Ms Montgomery said she and the other former staffers had not given up on having the bullying allegations further examined.

 

“We certainly are still holding her and her behaviour, in terms of occupational health and safety, to account,” she said. “She’s not getting away with the bullying, gaslighting and harassment and the personal trauma that she caused many of the staffers. She’s not getting away with it.”

 

Ms Montgomery said the senator had a poor relationship with many people in WA’s Indigenous communities, who felt she had not done enough to help them.

 

“People refuse to work with her, the Blak Greens refuse to work with her, Aboriginal members of the Australian Greens refuse to work with her. She doesn’t go into these remote communities. We have a lot of stuff going on in communities, homelessness, cost of living, obviously, the North West Shelf venture extension being announced, and Dorinda’s done absolutely nothing.”

 

Another prominent Indigenous figure, Save Our Songlines founder Raelene Cooper, said the senator’s s defection supported her long-held belief that Senator Cox was not “genuine” in her ­efforts to help grassroots campaigners in WA. “Good riddance to bad rubbish,” she said.

 

Ms Cooper has been aggressively campaigning against Woodside Energy’s North West Shelf, and Senator Cox had as recently as last week been adamant that the government should not ­approve the 40-year extension of the plant. Ms Cooper said she believed Senator Cox had realised that her best hope of political survival rested with Labor after the Greens “rejected” her.

 

“It is what it is, but … I feel really let down as an Aboriginal person in this country,” she said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 3, 2025, 3:23 a.m. No.23115836   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23115832

 

2/2

 

Beyond Senator Cox’s previous position on the North West Shelf, the senator’s previous comments on Israel and Gaza could also present headaches for the ­Albanese government.

 

Senator Cox has chanted “from the river to the sea” and “free, free Palestine” at a number of anti-Israel protests and has voted against Israel’s interests several times in the Senate.

 

Co-chief executive of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, Alex Ryvchin, told The Australian that he was concerned by Senator Cox’s participation in pro-Palestine rallies.

 

He noted that “from the river to the sea” had been described by Mr Albanese as inciting violence against Jewish people, while “free Palestine” was chanted by the man who allegedly murdered a young Jewish couple in Washington DC recently. “There is clearly a chasm between the Senator’s intentions and the movement to which she has lent her uncritical support,” he said.

 

“Now that she is a member of the government, we would expect her words and acts to be consistent with those of the government and not with the institutionally anti-Semitic party she left.”

 

He said he was willing to sit down with the senator “to explain the threat to life posed by the ‘free Palestine’ movement and to look at ways to help end the war without supporting those who incite and commit violence against Jewish people around the world”.

 

Lidia Thorpe – a former Greens colleague of Senator Cox, who quit to sit as an independent in early 2023 – said the senator should have become an independent rather than join Labor.

 

“While Senator Cox and I have had our differences, during her time with the Greens she spoke out strongly against this injustice. But we know that once you join Labor, you’re shut down. You’re not allowed to cross the floor. You’re not allowed to speak freely,” she said.

 

Senator Thorpe said that if changing Labor from within was possible, Fatima Payman would not have left the party over Labor’s position on Gaza.

 

“Senator Cox has been working hard on the Greens’ Truth and Justice Commission Bill, and when that comes to a vote, Labor’s rules will mean Senator Cox will not be allowed to vote in support of it,” she said.

 

“Labor already has several First Nations MPs. Labor already knows what needs to be done to deliver justice. Yet still the party continues to fail our people.”

 

Mr Albanese on Tuesday said Senator Cox understood that she must support Labor’s policies.

 

“Dorinda Cox understands that being a member of the Labor Party means that she will support positions that are made by the Labor Party,” he said.

 

Asked if he had counselled Senator Cox to rein in her commentary, Mr Albanese said she was an adult who had a distinguished career in the police and in parliament.

 

“She has come to the view that the Greens political party (is) not capable of achieving the change that she wants to see in public life. And that’s not surprising given that the Greens have lost their way,” he said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/bullying-complaints-against-labors-dorinda-cox-not-over/news-story/065cb44a104b79ab03463798a2bb5e0a

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 3, 2025, 3:34 a.m. No.23115853   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5857 >>2254

>>22968851

AUKUS partnership: UK unveils radical defence overhaul as Starmer eyes Russian threat

 

Reuters / abc.net.au - 3 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Britain says it will radically change its approach to defence to address threats from Russia, nuclear risks and cyber attacks by investing in drones and digital warfare rather than relying on a much larger army to engage in modern combat.

 

Responding to US President Donald Trump's insistence that Europe must take more responsibility for its security, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged the largest sustained increase to UK defence spending since the end of the Cold War.

 

The UK government's strategic defence review, published on Monday, local time, included plans to increase the size of its nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet.

 

The new submarines will be a model jointly developed by the UK, US and Australia under the security partnership AUKUS.

 

"We know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression," UK Defence Secretary John Healey said in a statement.

 

Britain will build up to 12 of its next-generation attack submarines — which are nuclear-powered but carry conventional non-nuclear weapons — to replace the current fleet of seven by the late 2030s, the Ministry of Defence said in a statement.

 

But with limited finances, the government's overall plan to boost the UK's defence capability envisages making the army more lethal, not larger, by learning from Ukraine where drones and technology have transformed the battlefield.

 

The government has promised to raise defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027, and target a 3 per cent level over the longer term.

 

Mr Healey said Britain's adversaries were working in greater alliance, and technology was changing how wars were fought.

 

"Drones now kill more people than traditional artillery in the war in Ukraine and whoever gets new technology into the hands of their armed forces the quickest will win," he said.

 

Sir Keir commissioned a strategic defence review shortly after he was elected last July, tasking experts including the former NATO boss, George Robertson, and a former Russia adviser to the White House, Fiona Hill, with formulating a plan for the next 10 years.

 

Despite cuts to the military budget in recent years, Britain still ranks alongside France as one of Europe's leading military powers, with its army helping to protect NATO's eastern flank and its navy maintaining a presence in the Indo-Pacific.

 

But its army, with 70,860 full-time trained soldiers, is its smallest since the Napoleonic era, and the government says it needs to be reformed given the growing strategic threats.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 3, 2025, 3:37 a.m. No.23115857   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23115853

 

2/2

 

New defence age

 

Under the plan accepted by the government, Britain will expand its fleet of attack submarines and spend 15 billion pounds ($31 billion) before the next election, due in 2029, on the replacement of the nuclear warheads for its main nuclear fleet.

 

It will build at least six new munitions plants, procure up to 7,000 British-made long-range weapons, and launch new communication systems for the battlefield.

 

A cyber and electromagnetic command will lead defensive and offensive cyber capabilities. The move follows UK military networks facing more than 90,000 "sub-threshold" attacks in the past two years.

 

But on the size of the armed forces, the review said it would not reduce numbers, even as a greater emphasis was put on technology, but increasing the total number of regular personnel should be prioritised when funding allowed, likely after 2029.

 

"The moment has arrived to transform how we defend ourselves," Sir Keir told workers at BAE Systems's Govan shipbuilding site in Scotland, saying he would "end the hollowing out of our armed forces".

 

"When we are being directly threatened by states with advanced military forces, the most effective way to deter them is to be ready."

 

Critics and political opponents have urged the UK government to put a date on when it will move defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP.

 

NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte has said he wants members to raise defence spending to 3.5 per cent of their GDP, and a further 1.5 per cent on broader security-related items to meet Mr Trump's demand for a 5 per cent target.

 

Sir Keir said he was "100 per cent confident" UK defence spending would hit 3 per cent in the next parliament, likely between 2029-2034 — something the review appeared to take into account when drafting its recommendations.

 

The government described its policy as "NATO first", drawing on the strength of the alliance's members which meant it would never fight alone.

 

Sir Keir has sought to cast the higher defence spending as a way to create jobs and wealth as he juggles severely strained public finances, a slow-growing economy and declining popularity among an increasingly dissatisfied electorate.

 

The announcement about new submarines helped lift the share prices of defence groups Babcock and Rolls-Royce.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-03/uk-unveils-radical-defence-overhaul-to-meet-new-global-threats/105368708

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CMJk_UY-Ar8

 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-strategic-defence-review-2025-making-britain-safer-secure-at-home-strong-abroad

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 3, 2025, 4:05 a.m. No.23115924   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2216

TikTok fires shot in social media war, putting heat on the federal government’s crackdown

 

JAMES MADDEN - June 02, 2025

 

The Albanese government will come under enormous pressure to deliver on its pre-election pledges relating to social media age restrictions and the news media bargaining code, as tech companies prepare well-funded public campaigns to lobby for amendments to the laws.

 

Video-sharing app TikTok fired its first post-election shot at the federal government last week, paying tens of thousands of dollars for four-and-a-half pages of advertising in the Nine-owned Australian Financial Review extolling the supposed educational and social benefits for children who use the social media platform.

 

In December, the government passed legislation to ban children under 16 from accessing certain social media platforms, including TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook, but granted an exemption for YouTube because of its perceived educational value.

 

That decision has angered YouTube’s commercial rivals, which are preparing extensive ad campaigns in the weeks and months ahead seeking to undermine the federal government’s social media legislation, due to come into effect in December.

 

In a statement to The Australian on Friday, a TikTok spokesman said: “As a platform, the safety of our community, particularly our younger users, is the highest priority and our in-built safety features recognise that people develop at different stages.

 

“Regarding the under-16 ban, the law is intended to keep young people safe and special exemptions, not based on evidence, undermine its intent. We will continue to work with the Australian government to keep teens safe and reduce the unintended consequences of this law.”

 

The intense lobbying in Australia by the social media platforms, and companies Meta and Google with regards to the media bargaining code, is complicated by the political landscape in the US, where tech companies are seeking to closely align themselves with the Trump administration, which is broadly sympathetic to their cause.

 

US President Donald Trump opposes the push to make tech companies compensate news media outlets for the use of their content, identifying the law earlier this year as a likely trade grievance, and he has also shown little interest in addressing the social harms caused to children by social media platforms.

 

During the election campaign, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said his government was committed to the news media bargaining code.

 

“Our government stands by our media bargaining code. And we have no intention of repealing the world-leading legislation that we passed with overwhelming support that set the minimum age for social media at 16,” he said on April 3.

 

“That policy is about what’s best for Australian children and Australian parents. These are our priorities.”

 

On the weekend, a spokesman for the Albanese government reiterated Labor’s commitment to its pledge to rein in the powers of social media platforms and tech companies.

 

“The Albanese government is progressing the electoral mandate to implement the social media minimum age and news bargaining reforms as key priorities,” the spokesman said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/media/tiktok-fires-shot-in-social-media-war-putting-heat-on-the-federal-governments-crackdown/news-story/24b5ed78938da9fab882b7647d990bde

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 3, 2025, 4:12 a.m. No.23115940   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2216

>>23103570

>>23111593

>>23111605

US Space Forces Indo-Pacific commander highlights growing role of space in regional security at Australian Space Summit

 

Capt. Gerald Peden - June 2, 2025

 

Sydney, Australia (AFNS) - U.S. Space Force Brig. Gen. Anthony Mastalir, USSF Indo-Pacific commander, emphasized the critical role of space capabilities in ensuring stability across the Indo-Pacific region at Australian Space Summit 2025, May 27-28.

 

Speaking to a diverse audience of defense leaders, industry partners, and policymakers, Mastalir underscored the evolving mission of the U.S. Space Force and the depth of the U.S.-Australia military alliance during a keynote address and panel discussion.

 

“In light of today’s challenges and the imperative for a robust, integrative response … we established U.S. Space Forces Indo-Pacific in 2022,” Mastalir said. “Our mission remains unchanged: integrated space operations to preserve a free and open Indo-Pacific.”

 

Mastalir highlighted the recent establishment of Space Force components in South Korea and Japan, underscoring a growing forward presence designed to deter threats and enhance operational integration with allies.

 

“Guardians in these components work side by side with our allies to integrate space capabilities into military operations and protect friendly forces from space-enabled attacks,” he explained.

 

He also reaffirmed the indispensable role of Australia in U.S. defense strategy, “Australia is not just a strategic partner, but a true friend, and an essential pillar of deterrence here,” Mastalir said. “Our nations have forged a bond that is both enduring and meaningful.”

 

Australian Defense Force Lt. Gen. Susan Coyle, ADF Joint Capabilities chief, underscored the critical importance of U.S.-Australian military cooperation in the rapidly evolving space domain while participating in a joint panel discussion with Mastalir.

 

"We have fought together since World War One,” Coyle said. “You don't build friends in a crisis. You build friends now, and we have a deep shared history of that.

 

Both generals discussed a shared strategic vision for the Indo-Pacific, focusing on deterrence and responsible space operations. Mastalir stressed that their approach is about "peace through strength," with both nations committed to preventing conflict by demonstrating robust defensive capabilities.

 

Coyle emphasized the importance of collaborative efforts, stating that Australia is "interested in how we can be a better, more lethal and more survivable defense force that contributes to peace and security in our region."

 

The discussion revealed a unified approach to space domain challenges, with both leaders highlighting the need to protect space assets critical to joint military operations. They also emphasized the importance of space domain awareness, satellite protection and developing technologies to counter emerging threats.

 

“Every challenge we face is also an opportunity—an opportunity to innovate, to grow stronger, and to set a shining example for the world,” Mastalir said.

 

With mounting challenges in the space domain, U.S. Space Forces Indo-Pacific is positioning itself as a keystone of deterrence, innovation and allied cooperation in the region.

 

As Mastalir affirmed, “This isn’t just about building stronger satellites or more agile fighting capabilities. It’s about building a legacy — one that fortifies our shared values and affirms our belief in a better, brighter future.”

 

https://www.spaceforce.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/4203106/us-space-forces-indo-pacific-commander-highlights-growing-role-of-space-in-regi/

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 2:12 a.m. No.23120646   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0650 >>0665 >>5030 >>9142 >>3825 >>2217

Tasmanian Labor leader Dean Winter tables no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff

 

Adam Langenberg - 4 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff has warned the state will head to the polls early if Labor's no confidence motion in him is successful

 

Mr Rockliff's leadership hangs by a thread, with the Greens' decision about whether to support a no-confidence motion set to determine whether or not he stays in the top job.

 

In a late night Facebook post on Tuesday, Mr Rockliff accused the Labor Party of being "hell bent on forcing Tasmania to an early election".

 

"An election just over 12 months since the last one," he said.

 

"That's the last thing Tasmanian needs.

 

"That's the last thing Tasmanians want."

 

Labor leader Dean Winter declared during his budget reply speech on Tuesday that he had no confidence in Mr Rockliff.

 

Mr Winter's position has already won the backing of three crossbenchers — independents Kristie Johnston and Craig Garland, and Jacqui Lambie Network MP Andrew Jenner.

 

"Today, I've tabled a motion that says the house has no confidence in this premier, because he's wrecked the budget, because he's planning to sell our power companies, our ports and our public transport, and because no one can trust him after the handling of the Spirit of Tasmania fiasco," Mr Winter said.

 

The opposition has repeatedly described last Thursday's budget, which forecast four deficits and debt reaching $10.8 billion in the 2028-29 financial year, as the worst budget in the state's history.

 

Mr Winter threw the gauntlet down to the crossbench to support the motion.

 

"If they really are opposed to the premier's agenda of debt, deficit and debacle as they claim, then tell the house you've lost confidence in this premier," he said.

 

"When enough members indicate their support for my motion, I will move it. If not, they will show they're happy to go along with this agenda, all of the debt, all of the cuts, all of the privatisation.

 

"And they'll show Tasmanians that a vote for anyone except Labor is a vote for the Liberals, and they can rest assured that we will let Tasmanians know exactly who is propping up this failed, incompetent, reckless Liberal government."

 

The motion needs the support of eight crossbenchers to succeed.

 

It currently has three, but will have the required eight if the Greens vote to support it at a partyroom meeting on Wednesday.

 

Greens to discuss 'in depth'

 

Greens MP Vica Bayley said the party would discuss it "in depth".

 

"We'll certainly take the time to have a look at it," Mr Bayley said.

 

If they do support it, Mr Winter could bring on the motion for debate as soon as Wednesday morning.

 

Other crossbenchers needed less time before deciding to support the motion, with Ms Johnston saying she was in favour even if it meant an early election.

 

"I will not be intimidated by the premier with the threat of an election," Ms Johnston said.

 

"He likes to threaten members of [parliament] with things like withdrawing an AFL team or an election … it's his job to be accountable, transparent and to act with integrity for the people of Tasmania, so he can't continue to threaten them."

 

She said the crossbench existed to hold the government to account.

 

"His budget is grossly mismanaged, his major project delivery is failing each and every time, it is not good enough."

 

Mr Jenner said he no longer had faith in Mr Rockliff's leadership.

 

"He runs that government, he's part of the government and if the budget isn't doing the job for the Tasmanian people then obviously the responsibility is his," he said.

 

"I truly think it's the right thing to do for Tasmanians, to hold the government to account for its spending."

 

Mr Garland said he gave the government a warning last year that he would not support this year's budget unless "they looked at attending to the dire straits we're in" and no longer had faith in the government.

 

"They've refused to look at areas to drag in extra revenue. Take the salmon industry for instance, if they would introduce a resource tax for the use of our waterways, we'd be millions and millions of dollars better off, but they're not prepared to do that," he said.

 

"How far do you go before you rein in an out-of-control, arrogant, ignorant government?"

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 2:14 a.m. No.23120650   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23120646

 

2/2

 

Beswick, Pentland unimpressed

 

Independent Miriam Beswick and Rebekah Pentland said they would not support Labor's no-confidence motion.

 

"The crossbench are not Dean Winter's little puppets, he can't just try and make us do what he thinks he wants," Ms Beswick said.

 

Ms Pentland said Labor had not provided a "real" alternative government.

 

"What we've seen in the short time we've been here is that Labor and Liberal are very much in line [with] most of their policies," Ms Pentland said.

 

She said it was "very coercive and quite condescending" that Mr Winter did not discuss the motion with the crossbench before calling them out in parliament.

 

"We want stability and we want business confidence and I don't think we're here to play silly buggers in the parliament," Ms Pentland said.

 

Ms Pentland said the budget reply should have focused on the budget.

 

"I think we're extremely disappointed in the budget, but what we heard today as a budget reply didn't really show any true alternative or anything that's actually going to really fix the budget."

 

Independent David O'Byrne did not say how he would vote, but that Labor members needed to make up their minds.

 

"A couple of weeks ago they said Tasmanians don't want an election, they need to make up their minds whether they want to govern or not," Mr O'Byrne said.

 

Successful motion means resignation, according to convention

 

If a motion of no-confidence is passed in a premier, parliamentary convention dictates they should resign.

 

An emergency meeting of the Parliamentary Liberal Party (PLP) was held on Tuesday night to discuss what would happen in the event of a successful motion.

 

The ABC understands the Premier told the meeting that he did not believe resigning was in the best interests of the party – and members agreed.

 

A Liberal source said members would return to parliament on Wednesday and show a united front, leaving Labor to decide if it wanted an election.

 

In parliament, Mr Rockliff attacked Labor's motion and accused it of "bullying" the crossbench.

 

"Extraordinary that you would threaten the crossbench … that have worked very hard for their constituencies, that they have delivered for their constituencies in the budget," Mr Rockliff said.

 

Mr Rockliff further defended the budget, which he said delivers a "sensible pathway to surplus" and invested record amounts in health and education.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-03/no-confidence-motion-targeting-tasmanian-premier-tabled-by-labor/105371116

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiN6Nc02cDs

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 2:20 a.m. No.23120665   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0671 >>5030 >>9142 >>2217

>>23120646

Chaos, election looms as Premier rolled by parliament

 

MATTHEW DENHOLM - 4 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Tasmania is in political limbo, with a lame-duck premier attempting to force an early election rather than resign - and no-one sure who will be leading the state by the weekend.

 

The island state’s beleaguered Liberal Premier, Jeremy Rockliff, is expected to visit acting governor Christopher Shanahan on or before Thursday morning to call an early election, rather than resign due to an ongoing no-confidence motion he appears certain to lose.

 

Despite losing the confidence of a majority of MPs for his minority government, Jeremy Rockliff on Wednesday vowed to “fight to my last breath”.

 

For now, it appears his shaken Liberals colleagues are standing by him, resisting the urge to cut him loose or accept any invitation by Chief Justice Shanahan to change leaders.

 

That means Labor leader Dean Winter may be called on to try to form a government - an invitation, with just 10 seats out of 35, sources suggest he is unlikely to accept.

 

Barring any change by the key players, such a standoff would force Tasmanians to the polls for a second time within 15 months, with a state budget frozen in parliament, threatening payment of public service wages.

 

Labor leader Dean Winter has secured the support of the Greens and three independents to oust Mr Rockliff, with grievances cited including alleged budget mismanagement, bungled ferry infrastructure projects, a privatisation agenda and the AFL stadium.

 

Mr Winter told the House of Assembly Mr Rockliff was taking state net debt from $1 billion when he became Premier in April 2022 to almost $11 billion by 2028-29.

 

“Jeremy Rockliff is sending Tasmania broke and his only plan to fix it is to sell Tasmanian assets that Tasmanians built together over the past 100 years,” Mr Winter said.

 

The Australian understands the Liberals encouraged key business figures to try to persuade Mr Winter to back-down on the motion, while also trying unsuccessfully to persuade two of the three independents to change their stance.

 

Mr Rockliff, whose Liberals secured just 14 of 35 seats at the March 2024 election, traded barbs with Mr Winter about who would be to blame for an early election.

 

“An election just over 12 months since the last one - that’s the last thing Tasmania needs,” Mr Rockliff said. “That’s the last thing Tasmanians want. Investment and business confidence would go off a cliff.

 

“Because the budget hasn’t been passed, nurses, doctors, firefighters and police would risk not being paid.”

 

Mr Rockliff told the Assembly Mr Winter was “reckless and weak” and placing a lust for power above Tasmania’s interests. “This day may not end well for me but this day will define you,” he said.

 

However, Mr Winter said Labor would continue to offer supply to a new Liberal premier and had been forced into the no confidence motion by budget mismanagement. “We need to change the trajectory of our public finances,” Mr Winter said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 2:21 a.m. No.23120671   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23120665

 

2/2

 

Some Liberals floated offering concessions to win back crossbenchers, such as dropping the government’s privatisation agenda or even the Hobart AFL stadium.

 

Approaches to key independent Craig Garland and JLN MP Andrew Jenner - who, with independent Kristie Johnston, are backing the motion - were rebuffed, with both suggesting it was too late to trade outcomes for support.

 

Governor Barbara Baker is out of the state, likely requiring Lieutenant Governor Christopher Shanahan, the Chief Justice, to handle the crisis.

 

The vice-regal representative is by convention expected to suggest the Liberals try to govern with another leader, with ministers Eric Abetz, Felix Ellis and Guy Barnett all seen as potential replacements.

 

However, Liberal sources suggested the party room was adamant no-one would accept that offer, forcing Chief Justice Shanahan to invite Mr Winter to try to form government.

 

The Labor leader is yet to clarify his position but is known to be reluctant to be seen to govern with support for the Greens, despite offers of support from Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff.

 

Dr Woodruff said her party would be willing to work with a minority Labor government . “The Greens will work in good faith in any negotiations,” she said.

 

Tasmania’s Football Club, the Tasmania Devils, voiced “great concern” about the political chaos.

 

“Like the rest of the community, we are unsure what will happen today and what the impacts of any actions taken might be,” the club said in a statement. “What we do know is that uncertainty presents a serious risk for jobs, investment and growth.”

 

However, both major parties reassured the AFL they remained committed to the controversial Hobart AFL stadium, which is a condition for entry to the league.

 

The latest opinion poll, by EMRS in May, showed Labor ahead of the Liberals for the first time in many years, but only just: 31 per cent to 29 per cent, with independents on 17 per cent, the Greens 14 per cent, and JLN 6 per cent.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/tasmanian-premier-jeremy-rockliff-threatens-early-election-after-no-confidence-motion/news-story/967683928cdcec5efc7a9499a7bc73b9

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 2:24 a.m. No.23120675   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2218

>>23094571

>>23103541

>>23106961

Australia spared Trump tariff letter as Ley says Albanese should secure special deal

 

Paul Sakkal - June 4, 2025

 

Australia has been spared a letter from the Trump administration demanding countries cut trade barriers to US goods as the White House prepares to reinstate its “liberation day” tariffs, but has not secured a UK-style exemption to increased steel and aluminium import taxes.

 

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley pushed Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to get the same reduced tariffs for Australian metal exports to the US that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer won for the UK, saying the opposition would work with the government to make it happen.

 

“President [Donald] Trump’s tariffs on our steelmakers are not in the spirit of our century-old partnership, and we urge the Americans to give Australia a fair go and remove them,” Ley said.

 

Trade Minister Don Farrell met his US counterpart Jamieson Greer in Paris overnight as Albanese prepares to hold his first meeting with Trump later this month, either in the US or on the sidelines of the G7 meeting of the world’s largest economies in Canada.

 

The meeting is expected to be dominated by Trump’s trade war and US requests for its allies to boost defence spending. Albanese this week pushed back against a request from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for Australia to boost its military spending from about 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent.

 

The United States Trade Representative, the office primarily responsible for trade matters, sent a letter to countries asking them to provide their best offer for a trade deal by Wednesday, US time. The Trump administration confirmed the missive, first reported by Reuters.

 

The letter suggests fresh urgency from the Trump administration as it looks to settle trade deals with partners before July 8, when the 90-day “pause” on Trump’s so-called reciprocal tariffs expires.

 

An Australian government spokeswoman said Australia did not receive the letter because it was only sent to nations with a higher tariff rate than the baseline 10 per cent rate.

 

“Australia is in the lowest ‘baseline’ tariff tier of 10 per cent,” she said. “As such, the US administration has confirmed Australia has not been sent a letter.

 

“Trade Minister Farrell met with his US counterpart today in Paris and pressed for the removal of unjustified tariffs imposed on Australian goods.”

 

The US president signed an executive order raising metals tariffs from 25 to 50 per cent overnight.

 

The only nation singled out was Britain, which will continue to be levied a 25 per cent tariff after Starmer struck a deal with Trump following a free trade pact agreed in principle between the countries.

 

Metals tariffs on imports from Britain will remain at the previous 25 per cent as the nations continue to negotiate up to a July 9 cut-off. In early April, Trump declared “liberation day” for America by instituting double-digit tariffs on countries around the world, but suspended them after markets dropped precipitously.

 

Ley told this masthead: “We note that the United Kingdom has been able to secure an exemption from the latest American steel tariffs and we stand ready to work with the Albanese government to ensure Australia can achieve the same outcome.

 

“The Coalition wants the government to succeed here because that is in our national interest.”

 

Ley’s comments are more conciliatory than those of her predecessor Peter Dutton, who claimed repeatedly during the recent federal election campaign that he could secure a better tariff deal than Labor if he were elected. The Turnbull government secured an exemption on metals tariffs in Trump’s first term, as did other allies, but the US administration has been far less inclined to give exemptions this time.

 

In a statement, Trump said he had decided to “provide different treatment” to the UK after a deal that was struck between Washington and London in May.

 

The 50 per cent tariff rate more widely is due to come into force from 12.01am Washington, DC, time on Wednesday.

 

Marghanita Johnson, chief executive of the Australian Aluminium Council, said this week the industry was working to understand the impact the recently revised aluminium specific tariff will have on Australia’s aluminium trade.

 

“A key concern is the potential for the distortion of international trade flows, which disrupt efficient market operations and increase the risk of trade diversion,” Johnson said.

 

The UK is a relatively minor player in aluminium exports, trading about 22,000 tonnes of aluminium into the US a year, well below Australia’s export of 82,000 tonnes last year which made it the eighth largest source of aluminium imports to the US.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australia-spared-trump-tariff-letter-as-ley-says-albanese-should-secure-special-deal-20250604-p5m4sl.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 2:34 a.m. No.23120694   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2276

>>23062845

>>23103570

Beijing denounces Marles over ‘China threat’ as Farrell is welcomed to Shanghai

 

Beijing condemned Richard Marles for stoking anti-China sentiment while inviting Don Farrell to Shanghai, as the US pressures Australia to reduce economic ties with its largest trading partner.

 

WILL GLASGOW - 4 June 2025

 

Beijing has denounced Defence Minister Richard Marles for spreading the “China threat” while inviting Trade Minister Don Farrell to visit Shanghai in November, as Canberra comes under pressure from Washington to ramp up its defence budget and reduce its economic ties with China.

 

Late on Tuesday, China’s Foreign Ministry condemned the US, Japan, Australia and the Philippines after the four American allies met on the sidelines of a security conference in Singapore and discussed shared concerns about Beijing’s use of force and coercion in the East China Sea and the South China Sea.

 

“The US, together with Japan, Australia, and the Philippines, brazenly spread the false accusation of (the) ‘China threat’ at the Shangri-La Dialogue and sought to use the East China Sea issue and the South China Sea issue to sow discord and incite confrontation between regional countries. China strongly deplores and firmly opposes it, and has made serious protests,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian told a press conference in Beijing.

 

“Bloc politics and confrontation will not solve any problem, still less intimidate China. We will not flinch in defending China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights and interests.”

 

Hours later, in Paris, Senator Farrell was feted by his Chinese counterpart, Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, who urged Canberra to “jointly safeguard the multilateral trading system” with Beijing.

 

Senator Farrell accepted an invitation from the Chinese Commerce Minister to attend the China International Import Expo in Shanghai in November, according to a Chinese government readout of the meeting, which was held on the sidelines of the OECD. It will be the third consecutive year the Australian Trade Minister has attended the trade show, the most politically important in China.

 

This year’s trade show will be the first Senator Farrell will attend since Beijing ended all of the trade restrictions it had previously imposed on Australia.

 

In a dramatic reversal after their four years in China’s crosshairs, Australian farmers are benefiting at the expense of their American counterparts, who have been targeted by Beijing during its trade tussle with the Trump administration. Restrictions on American beef exports to China have given Australian farmers a near-monopoly of the country’s almost $5bn premium beef market.

 

Senator Farrell has explicitly distanced the Albanese government from the agenda of the Trump administration, which has tried to pressure allies and partners to reduce their economic relations with China.

 

“China is our largest trading partner,” Senator Farrell said recently. “We don’t want to do less business with China, we want to do more business with China.”

 

The duelling statements from the Chinese government come as Washington strong-arms Canberra to hike its defence budget to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

 

Beijing has not yet commented on the American pressure on Canberra, but senior researchers at government-linked institutions have given insight into the Chinese government’s thinking.

 

“You have to walk on a tightrope. Your future is deeply embedded in this region, which is the centre of gravity for economic prosperity,” Zhou Bo, a retired senior col­onel in the People’s Liberation Army, told The Australian this week.

 

Mr Zhou, a senior fellow at Tsinghua Univer­sity’s Centre for International Security and Strategy in Beijing, said Australia needed to be careful it did not follow the US into a conflict with the PLA in contested areas around China.

 

“Is it necessary for you to follow the US to challenge China? If you do not go to China, there’s no way China would come to Australia to fight against you,” he said. “This is a moment for Australia to do some soul-searching.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/beijing-denounces-marles-over-china-threat-as-farrell-is-welcomed-to-shanghai/news-story/73bf1c8bec412604d02b92450e368d4e

 

https://www.mfa.gov.cn/mfa_eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202506/t20250603_11639655.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 2:51 a.m. No.23120730   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Child abuse survivors pay tribute to Victorian detective Denis Ryan

 

Tyrone Dalton - 4 June 2025

 

Former Victorian police officer Denis Ryan has been remembered for his courage in attempting to prosecute paedophile Catholic priest Monsignor John Day in the 1970s.

 

Mr Ryan died on Tuesday at the age of 93.

 

He was a detective based in Mildura in north-west Victoria when he was forced out of Victoria Police in 1972 for attempting to prosecute Monsignor Day.

 

A year earlier, he had learned of multiple allegations against the priest for child sexual abuse and began his investigation, but was told to stop by his superiors.

 

A contemporary of convicted paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale, Monsignor Day has since been shown to be one of Australia's most prolific child sex abusers.

 

Monsignor Day remained a priest until he died in 1978, aged 74.

 

On Wednesday, Peter Hoysted — Mr Ryan's friend and co-author of the memoir Unholy Trinity: The Hunt for Paedophile Priest Monsignor John Day — led the tributes to Mr Ryan.

 

"He was quite simply the best man I have ever met," Mr Hoysted said.

 

"No sanctimony, a wicked sense of humour and courage to burn."

 

It took more than 40 years for Victoria Police to apologise to Mr Ryan in 2016, but compensation was not made until two years later.

 

"He never let up, refused numerous inducements offered which would have silenced him and allowed terrible crimes against children to remain in the shadows," Mr Hoysted said.

 

Ryan never forgot about victims

 

John Fitzgibbon, who was abused by Monsignor Day, described Mr Ryan as "a great man" who validated the abuse local children had suffered.

 

"He listened. [It was important] to be heard and believed because when we were younger, we didn't think anybody would believe it," Mr Fitzgibbon said.

 

"But it was always Denis who was there for you. He believed it because he had statements from us younger ones."

 

In 2015, Victoria Police admitted a conspiracy to cover up the crimes of Monsignor Day went right to the top, with Mr Ryan telling the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse that "a Catholic mafia" within Victorian Police had thwarted his attempts to charge the priest.

 

"His determination meant a lot to us all," Mr Fitzgibbon said.

 

"He's a chap that's going to be really missed in our community and missed by a lot of victims that he still had time for."

 

Mr Ryan was named the Australia Day Citizen of the Year by Mildura Rural City Council in 2018.

 

Mildura Rural City councillor Ali Cupper, who also was a friend of Mr Ryan, said his story was one of international significance.

 

"People like him were unfortunately in the minority for a very long time, but who shone a light on one of the darkest chapters of our history — the rampant sexual abuse of children by people whose job it was to protect them," she said.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-04/denis-ryan-vic-detective-dies-child-sex-abuse-catholic-church/105374772

 

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/he-dedicated-his-life-to-fighting-for-justice-for-victims-of-child-sexual-abuse-in-the-catholic-church-at-93-hero-detective-denis-ryan-has-died/news-story/bd1f723dd7b38ad2312f6f190ab148d1

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 3:41 a.m. No.23120783   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2276

>>23032055

>>23120778

Archive: Chinese troops fire on protesters in Tiananmen Square

 

BBC News

 

Jun 5, 2014

 

First broadcast 4 June 1989. Chinese troops opened fire on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing's Tiananmen Square on Saturday evening. The collection of students and labourers had been occupying the site for several weeks.

 

Despite the outbreak of "unremitting gunfire", the protesters refused to leave. The BBC's Kate Adie reports from the scene.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kMKvxJ-Js3A

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 3:45 a.m. No.23120792   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2276

>>23032055

>>23120778

How NBC Covered Tiananmen Square In 1989

 

NBC News

 

Jun 5, 2019

 

Warning: Viewers may find some images in this video disturbing. On the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square uprising, we hit the archives and revisit our coverage.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXJ6gHFME0w

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 3:49 a.m. No.23120800   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2276

>>23032055

>>23120778

Tiananmen Square Protests 1989: Chinese Soldiers Open Fire on Civilians

 

ABC News

 

Jun 5, 2012

 

"World News" report from June 4, 1989: Chinese soldiers open fire on civilian, pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9AvUuEPgvA

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 3:51 a.m. No.23120805   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2276

>>23032055

>>23120778

Tiananmen Square: Watch The 1989 Report On The Crackdown

 

Sky News

 

Jun 4, 2014

 

It's 25 years since protests in Tiananmen Square, China, were brought to a bloody end by soldiers who killed hundreds of unarmed civilians.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yE7EkTRS96M

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 4, 2025, 4:09 a.m. No.23120830   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2276

>>23032055

>>23120778

>>23120815

Man vs. tank in Tiananmen square (1989)

 

CNN

 

Jun 4, 2013

 

A CNN crew covering the June 5, 1989, protests in Beijing recorded a man stopping a Chinese tank in Tiananmen Square.

 

''The story behind the iconic 'Tank Man' photo.''

 

At first, Jeff Widener was annoyed by the man entering his shot.

 

Widener, a photographer with the Associated Press, was focusing his camera on a line of tanks in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square when out of the blue came this man in a white shirt and dark trousers, carrying what appeared to be shopping bags.

 

Widener thought the man was going to mess up the composition of his frame.

 

Little did he know that he was about to make one of the most iconic photos in history.

 

It was June 5, 1989, a day after Chinese troops began violently cracking down on pro-democracy demonstrators who had been in the square for over a month.

 

Widener had been in Beijing for a week to cover the protests, and he was hurt when the deadly crackdown began.

 

“I was hit in the head by a protester rock the early morning of June 4, and I was also suffering from the flu,” Widener said. “So I was quite ill and injured when I photographed ‘Tank Man’ from the sixth-floor balcony of the Beijing Hotel.”

 

The hotel had the best vantage point of the square, which was now under military control. An American exchange student, Kirk Martsen, helped sneak him in.

 

From the hotel balcony, Widener watched as the man confronted the lead tank, standing directly in front of it. The tank stopped and tried to go around the man. The man moved with the tank, blocking its path once again.

 

At one point during the standoff, the man climbed aboard the lead tank and appeared to speak to whoever was inside.

 

“I was about a half mile away from the row of tanks and so I could not really hear much,” Widener said.

 

The man was eventually pulled away by onlookers. To this day, we don’t know who he is and what happened to him. But he remains a powerful symbol of defiance.

 

By this point, the Chinese government was trying desperately to control the message going out to the world. Several days before the crackdown began, China had made efforts to stop all American news outlets, including CNN, from broadcasting live in Beijing.

 

“There was always a huge risk of being arrested and having film confiscated,” Widener said.

 

Martsen, the student who helped Widener get into the Beijing Hotel, put the “Tank Man” film in his underwear and smuggled it out of the hotel. The pictures were soon transmitted over telephone lines to the rest of the world.

 

Several media outlets took a photo of “Tank Man,” but Widener’s shot was the most used. It appeared on the front pages of newspapers all around the world, and it was nominated that year for a Pulitzer Prize.

 

“Though I knew the picture was highly acclaimed, it wasn't until years later when I saw an AOL post where my image was named one of the top 10 most memorable photos of all time. That was the first time that I realized I had accomplished something extraordinary,” Widener said.

 

The protests in Beijing started after the death of former communist leader Hu Yaobang on April 18, 1989. Hu had worked to move China toward a more open political system, and he had become a symbol of democratic reform. Mourning students marched to Tiananmen Square to call for a more democratic government.

 

Thousands of people joined the students over the next few weeks to protest China’s communist rulers.

 

A rally on May 19 drew an estimated 1.2 million people. A 33-foot-tall statue, the Goddess of Democracy, was built in four days and placed in the square.

 

“There was a carnival atmosphere and a lightness in the air,” Widener recalled. “I think most of the media was swept up in the whole affair, and I personally found it amazing that there was a statue of democracy across the Chang’an Boulevard which faced off against the giant Mao portrait symbolizing communism.”

 

Chinese troops began firing on demonstrators at about 1 a.m. on June 4. There has never been an official death toll released. Estimates range from several hundred to thousands.

 

It has also been estimated that as many as 10,000 people were arrested during and after the protests. Several dozen were executed.

 

Widener spent a week in Beijing after the crackdown began, then he got out.

 

“I was sick with the flu, suffering from a head injury and scared to death when I left for the airport,” he said.

 

To this day, his photos — and anything referring to the massacre — are banned in China.

 

https://edition.cnn.com/interactive/2019/05/world/tiananmen-square-tank-man-cnnphotos/

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YeFzeNAHEhU

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 5, 2025, 2:34 a.m. No.23125030   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5034 >>9142 >>3825 >>2218

>>23120646

>>23120665

‘Cowardly power grab’ says ‘heartbroken’ Premier ahead of election call

 

MATTHEW DENHOLM - 5 June 2025

 

An emotional Tasmanian Premier has restated his intention to seek a snap early election, after losing a no-confidence vote in state parliament, accusing Labor of “cowardice” and a “grab for power”.

 

The state’s House of Assembly voted 18 votes to 17 to express no confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockliff over alleged budget mismanagement, bungled ferries infrastructure and a privatisation push.

 

The vote was tied 17 each way, with Labor Speaker Michelle O’Byrne using her casting vote to pass the motion.

 

Ms O’Byrne said no one could expect her to vote confidence in a Liberal premier, while also warning the house would need to continue to sit long enough to pass a special supply bill to ensure public servants could be paid during any election period.

 

Mr Rockliff restated his intention to seek an early election, after the no-confidence motion passed.

 

“This will be an election that Tasmanians don’t want and that Tasmania cannot afford,” he told the Assembly.

 

Broken Hearted

 

However, he said a snap poll was “on the heads” of Labor leader Dean Winter and the ALP. “This has been a selfish grab for power that we will fight and do our darnedest to win … This is not a fair fight; this is a cowardice act.”

 

Mr Rockliff, who appeared exhausted after a two-day debate, said he was disappointed that the no-confidence motion passed but vowed to “fight this all the way”. “This is a sad day for Tasmania,” he said.

 

Mr Rockliff said the minority government elected in March 2024 had achieved much for all MPs.

 

“We’ve got most of our agenda through because of our negotiations with each other,” he said. “That’s why I’m so disappointed, if not broken hearted, frankly.”

 

Mr Rockliff stood by the Hobart AFL stadium and Devils team. “I believe in this team so passionately because it’s working now – young kids right now believe and are aspiring,” he said.

 

The embattled leader, who may yet face a party room challenge to avoid an election Liberal strategies are worried will see the party go backward, said he would advise lieutenant governor Christopher Shanahan to call an election, the second within 15 months.

 

“This will be the advice that I will provide to the lieutenant governor: that an election is needed unless (Labor leader) Dean Winter forms government with the Greens,” he said. Mr Winter has ruled out such a move.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 5, 2025, 2:35 a.m. No.23125034   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23125030

 

2/2

 

Leadership discussions

 

Sources told The Australian that while unlikely, there were discussions within the Parliamentary Liberal Party about replacing Mr Rockliff – most likely with former treasurer Michael Ferguson – to avoid an election.

 

Senior figures with the Liberal Party believe the PLP is committing electoral suicide in going to an election at which they believe it will struggle to retain its existing 14 seats in the 35 seat Assembly.

 

Sources said MPs were briefed on Wednesday about seat losses expected at the poll.

 

Mr Winter and three disaffected crossbenchers who backed the motion, with the Greens, blamed Mr Rockliff for the crisis and called on him to resign to avoid an election.

 

“The only person forcing Tasmania to an early election is Jeremy Rockliff,” Mr Winter said. “If he is granted an election, Labor is ready to go because we strongly believe Tasmania needs change.

 

“The deals he struck with the crossbench have collapsed after he announced plans to sell Tasmanian assets, stuffed the Spirits (Bass Strait ferries) and broke the budget.

 

“He has lost the support of Tasmanians, too. At the last election, he promised stability. He’s delivered anything but.”

 

A new premier of any description would require new deals with the balance of power crossbenchers, raising uncertainty over the government’s agenda, including privatisations and the Hobart AFL stadium.

 

Mr Rockliff, Premier since April 2022, was expected to attend Government House on Thursday night to advise Chief Justice Shanahan he has lost the confidence of the Assembly.

 

The Lieutenant Governor is expected to appoint him acting premier for the purpose of passing a temporary supply bill, to ensure public services can function during any election campaign.

 

That bill could be expected to be passed on Friday or early next week, after which time the Assembly could be dissolved for an election, which could be held on or after July 12.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/tasmanian-election-looms-as-constitutional-crisis-deepens/news-story/1e238df745cd9aed2e76601dfc759341

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cxuiebzwdj8

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 5, 2025, 2:46 a.m. No.23125045   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5047

>>23032055

>>23094566

‘We stand with Australia’: PNG drives defence pact amid China push

 

AMANDA HODGE - 4 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Papua New Guinea’s push for a defence treaty with Canberra sends a message to all competing interests in the region that the ­Pacific nation “stands with Australia” and supports the international rules-based order, PNG’s Defence Minister said in a landmark speech that nails the country’s security ­allegiances to the mast.

 

Speaking at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute defence conference in Canberra on Wednesday, Billy Joseph said the ­recent circumnavigation of Australia by Chinese People’s Liberation Army navy ships, which also entered PNG waters, had underlined the potential threats faced by Pacific nations.

 

“We, like everybody else, have a very strong economic partnership with China,” Mr Joseph said.

 

“And I’m sure Australia also has the same, same as the US and everybody. But when it comes to security, we choose our traditional partners, which is Australia (and the) US.

 

“For us, the economy and ­security are intertwined, and we can’t separate one from the other. Therein lies opportunity as well as risks … that countries can use economy as a means to push the security interest. And that’s ­already happening,” he added, in unusually frank comments about Chinese economic coercion in the region.

 

Mr Joseph said Australia and PNG were “tied at the hips”, not only by their geographical proximity but by a shared history of hardship and resilience during World War II. “That is why we have proposed from the PNG side that we should have a defence treaty,” he said.

 

“We send a message with all these competing interests in the region that PNG stands with Australia and those countries that share the same values … countries that subscribe to international rules based order and a free and open Indo-Pacific.”

 

The Defence Minister’s comments represent a significant shift in public messaging for PNG, the Pacific Island region’s largest ­nation, and a win for the federal government amid intensifying geopolitical rivalry with China that could set a precedent for its dealings with other Pacific island states.

 

Australia has been pushing for years for a legally binding defence treaty with PNG – a country with vast maritime zones that lies just 4km from Australia at its closest point – but was forced to settle for a downgraded bilateral security agreement in 2023 because of PNG reservations over such a commitment.

 

That it is now the PNG government pushing for the treaty – its first since it gained independence from Australia 50 years ago – reflects both rapidly changing global circumstances and Prime Minister James Marape’s ambitions to build up his country’s defence forces so that it can be a key contributor to regional security.

 

“It’s a huge step and in terms of the rest of the region it puts PNG as the most closely aligned (nation) to Australia on regional security interests,” said Lowy Institute Pacific Islands program ­director Mihai Sora.

 

“Australia has always been the preferred security partner of the region, but Pacific Island leaders have been reluctant to go out on a limb and say so publicly, particularly in recent years as China’s economic influence has grown throughout the region.

 

“So this is a huge change in public messaging and not something Canberra would be used to hearing from a Pacific leader.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 5, 2025, 2:47 a.m. No.23125047   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23125045

 

2/2

 

Mr Joseph said defence officials from both sides had made good progress on the treaty and would meet in Brisbane next week to begin discussions on a “zero draft”.

 

The agreement is expected to build on growing bilateral defence engagement that includes preliminary discussions on Papua New Guineans serving in the ADF as Australian soldiers, and the inclusion of PNG as a host nation for elements of Australia’s annual Talisman Sabre defence exercises this year.

 

Crucially, it could also include a legally binding commitment – similar to clauses in recently signed bilateral agreements with Tuvalu and Nauru – for both countries to consult each other on security issues, or before entering into security relationships with third parties.

 

While treaty talks come in the wake of a significant boost in ­Australian investment in PNG through a $600m rugby league initiative and $570m in recent budget support, Mr Sora said the high-level defence agreement was “something Australia can replicate elsewhere” without necessarily committing to huge boosts in spending.

 

“If it all works out that’s what I would see as the next step; how else can we elevate other existing security relationships,” he said.

 

Still, the process to get the treaty may not be straightforward given potential political sensitivities that Beijing may seek to exploit in order to derail the process.

 

“Both want to be seen to be signing something around the anniversary of PNG independence (on September 16) so there is some risk they may settle for less for the sake of the photo event,” Mr Sora said.

 

“How (the PNG government) socialise the benefits of this to the PNG public will be one of the biggest obstacles.

 

“Whether it’s general political dissent or manufactured dissent China will have an interest in derailing this agreement. (Beijing) will be looking to maximise any legitimate resistance.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/we-stand-with-australia-png-drives-defence-pact-amid-china-push/news-story/ea3ec5880522abdc4a9349b080b6c3e0

 

https://www.facebook.com/61553745759548/posts/122206096736124858

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 5, 2025, 2:59 a.m. No.23125059   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8114

>>22734120 (pb)

>>23032055

>>23007467

Former Australian PM Malcolm Turnbull: I'm sure that Trump will not get his way with China

 

CNBC International Live

 

Jun 5, 2025

 

Malcolm Turnbull says that China's relatively consistent and measured approach compared to the U.S.'s erraticism will be welcomed by many countries, that it is dawning on Trump he cannot bully China, and that Trump's belief that "might is right" is very unattractive to middle powers like Australia who have to work together and stand up for their values.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXdZ6uiekdk

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 5, 2025, 3:03 a.m. No.23125063   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2254

>>22968851

>>22977683

AUKUS has serious problems, Australia probably won't receive any submarines: Malcolm Turnbull

 

CNBC International Live

 

Jun 5, 2025

 

Malcolm Turnbull, former Prime Minister of Australia, says that AUKUS wasn't a very good deal for the country and that he thinks President Trump would love the deal as the U.S. would receive money without necessarily having to deliver anything in return.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ImYVFH5wiUo

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 6, 2025, 7:30 p.m. No.23134162   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4165 >>9588

>>22998144

>>23094566

Visa refusal sparks fresh concerns Solomon Islands may block Taipei from Pacific forum

 

Stephen Dziedzic and Chrisnrita Leong - 6 June 2025

 

1/2

 

The Solomon Islands government blocked a group of Taiwanese officials from entering the Pacific country earlier this year, stirring fresh concerns in Taipei that it might be locked out of a key regional meeting in Honiara later this year.

 

Solomon Islands will host the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting in September, and signalled last year that it might break with a long running precedent and refuse visas to Taiwanese officials who want to meet with their three remaining Pacific diplomatic allies on the sidelines.

 

Both Australian and Pacific officials insist that the Solomon Islands government has given them private assurances this year that it will not take that step.

 

But the ABC has been told that when a small group of officials from Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs applied to enter Solomon Islands in March — largely to begin planning the logistics for its PIF delegation — their visa applications were rejected.

 

Australian government sources have said Solomon Islands has since reassured them again that Taiwan's representatives will not be blocked in September, but that this directive was still "working its way through the system", suggesting the decision was an error.

 

A spokesperson from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) told the ABC it was "working closely" with Solomon Islands on preparations for the leaders meeting, "as we do with every host".

 

"There has been no change to arrangements regarding Taiwan's engagement with the Pacific Islands Forum, which have been in place since agreed by leaders in 1992," they said.

 

"The (meeting) is an opportunity for all Forum members to come together to ensure our region is well placed to pursue our shared interests, deepen regional cooperation and strengthen PIF unity."

 

One Pacific island government source also told the ABC that the Forum Secretariat and Pacific leaders were confident Taiwan would be able to participate in the Honiara meeting without any issues.

 

But the March incident has still stirred anxiety in Taipei, which has been fighting a losing battle with Beijing to maintain diplomatic allies in the Pacific, and which fears China is succeeding in its efforts to marginalise it in the region.

 

Solomon Islands has cut off all official contact with Taiwan in the wake of its decision to switch diplomatic ties to Beijing in 2019, and last year threw its weight behind China's declaration that it will "reunify" the self-ruled island with the mainland.

 

Solomon Islands last year also backed Beijing's push to strip Taiwan of its status as a development partner for the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF).

 

That frustrated leaders from the three Pacific nations which retain diplomatic ties with Taiwan, with Palau's President Surangel Whipps even warning that if Taiwan is locked out it could ignite a dispute like the "PIF split" which plunged the organisation into chaos in 2021.

 

Mr Whipps said earlier this week that he had heard Taiwan was having "some difficulty gaining access" to the meeting, and stressed that it was critical Palau be able to hold meetings with its diplomatic partner in Honiara.

 

Solomon Islands has not yet explained why the Taiwanese officials were refused visas in March.

 

The Director of Immigration in Solomon Islands, Chris Akosawa, pointed out that Solomon Islands has recently tightened entry restrictions on Taiwan passport holders, but referred the ABC to the Solomon Islands Foreign Ministry for comment.

 

The ABC sent questions to the Foreign Ministry, but didn't receive a response.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 6, 2025, 7:32 p.m. No.23134165   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23134162

 

2/2

 

So far, Solomon Islands has not given any public assurances that Taiwan will be able to attend the leaders meeting.

 

In May, Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele issued a forceful statement reaffirming his government's commitment to the One China Policy and ordering officials "not to engage in any official capacity with representatives or entities associated with 'Taiwan', China".

 

"This includes official visits, communications, commitments, or participation in events involving 'Taiwan', China," he said.

 

On Monday Mr Manele also declined to say whether his government had made a final decision on Taiwan's participation, although he said he was "working very closely with the Forum Secretariat in terms of these arrangements".

 

"We are fully aware of that situation. So we are looking into that, it's a regional meeting and of course countries also have their national interest as well," he said.

 

A second Pacific island government source said Mr Manele's acknowledgement that the PIF leaders meeting is a "regional" gathering was a good sign that "commonsense would prevail" and that Solomon Islands wouldn't upset the status quo.

 

Invitations to PIF leaders and dialogue partners are expected to be issued shortly.

 

Analysts warn that if Taiwan is excluded it would undermine the authority of the PIF Secretariat and set a dangerous precedent which could undermine Pacific unity and see further splintering — particularly with Palau due to host the leaders meeting next year.

 

A third Pacific government source said it also was not clear if the United States would attend the meeting as a dialogue partner if Taiwan was excluded.

 

A spokesperson for Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs declined to comment on its officials being denied entry but pointed to a 1992 communique endorsed by all PIF leaders which specifically says Taiwan should be able to hold a meeting with Pacific nations "at the same venue as the Forum".

 

"Since 1993, Taiwan has participated as a development partner in various PIF mechanisms and events under the name Taiwan/Republic of China," they said.

 

"Taiwan will continue to broaden collaboration with the PIF, diplomatic allies in the Pacific, and other like-minded countries, especially in such areas as climate change, food security, clean energy, and talent cultivation, jointly making contributions to the peace, stability, development, and prosperity of the Pacific region."

 

Blake Johnson from the Australian Strategic Policy Institute said while it wasn't yet clear what Solomon Islands would do, it "may be more willing to upset the status quo than people expect".

 

He also said excluding Taiwan from the meeting "certainly could cause fractures within the PIF".

 

"The PIF unites the Pacific and gives members a stronger global voice without compromising the sovereign decision-making of independent nations," he said.

 

"Without the PIF and other regional institutions functioning properly, some Pacific nations will find it more difficult to access support from and participate in valuable initiatives from policing to climate change adaptation funding."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-06/taiwanese-officials-blocked-from-solomon-islands/105385966

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 6, 2025, 7:42 p.m. No.23134204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4780 >>8064 >>2218

>>23094571

>>23103541

>>23106961

PM insists biosecurity is 'first priority' as beef tops agenda in upcoming US trade talks

 

Eleanor Wilson - Jun 6, 2025

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has vowed not to compromise biosecurity as trade negotiations over beef are set to top the agenda in crucial talks with US President Donald Trump.

 

Trump singled out Australia's ban on US beef during a Liberation Day tariff announcement in April, claiming Australia "won't take any of our beef" due to a concern over mad cow disease.

 

Cattle Australia disputes that claim, because a ban on US beef was lifted in 2019, provided the cattle is born, raised and slaughtered in the US.

 

But concerns over "mixed herds" mean beef from the US rarely makes it to Australian plates.

 

US exporters are currently unable to prove their herds don't include beef that was born in Mexico and Canada, which are still rated a biosecurity risk, then later slaughtered in the US.

 

"We haven't been assured there's a system that allows the appropriate tracing of animals, or appropriate traceback of animals," Cattle Australia chief executive Dr Chris Parker said.

 

A review is underway into whether that should change, which could be used as a bargaining chip for Trump to drop all tariffs against Australia.

 

"You shouldn't cut a deal at any cost, and particularly the cost of Australian biosecurity," Nationals leader David Littleproud said.

 

"This will decimate the agricultural sector if we blink and allow President Trump to be able to roll over us and our biosecurity standards."

 

Albanese today assured the industry he would not jeopardise biosecurity during upcoming negotiations.

 

"Our first priority is biosecurity and there'll be no compromise on that," he said.

 

"If things can be sorted out, in a way that protects our biosecurity, of course, we don't just say no.

 

"I deal with people, whoever they are, in the same respectful way. I expect respect back.

 

"I'm the prime minister of Australia, we don't have a subservient relationship to any nation."

 

Albanese is expected to meet Trump face-to-face within the next two weeks, likely on the sidelines of the G7 meeting in Canada.

 

That meeting could make or break trade negotiations concerning several industries.

 

https://www.9news.com.au/national/pm-insists-biosecurity-is-first-priority-as-beef-tops-agenda-in-upcoming-us-trade-talks/61f0d34b-0310-497f-9397-3a0b527535c4

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE9OX6UJCuk

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 3:08 a.m. No.23139131   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9132 >>4540 >>2149

>>23094549

Israeli influencer Hillel Fuld’s visa cancelled for Australian speaking tour

 

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 8 June 2025

 

1/2

 

The Albanese government has cancelled the visa of high-profile Israeli-American tech influencer Hillel Fuld, citing concerns that his presence in the country may pose a risk to “the health, safety or good order” of the Australian community, particularly among Muslim Australians.

 

The Department of Home Affairs quietly cancelled Mr Fuld’s travel visa this week, accusing him of using social media to deny “documented atrocities” in Gaza, promote Islamophobic views, and spread inflammatory content that could incite division amid heightened community tensions.

 

Mr Fuld was due to speak at fundraising events in Melbourne and Sydney later this month hosted by Magen David Adom Australia — the local affiliate of Israel’s national emergency medical and blood service.

 

The events were billed as discussions on Israeli innovation and technology, with Mr Fuld expected to share insights on the tech sector and his personal experiences. Funds raised were to go toward the construction of a new ambulance station in southern Israel.

 

But according to departmental records obtained by The Australian, Home Affairs officials concluded that Mr Fuld had a documented pattern of sharing provocative content, including broad attacks on the Palestinian identity, denial of “documented atrocities” in Gaza, and claims that large segments of the Muslim population support terrorism.

 

One post cited in the visa cancellation decision was a March 2024 Instagram video in which Mr Fuld dismissed as “propaganda” reports by international media outlets that Israeli troops had opened fire on starving Palestinians looking for food aid in Gaza, killing over 100.

 

“There was no massacre of Palestinians in Gaza today,” he said in the clip. “Palestinians trampled each other as they fought for the aid that the IDF sent in.”

 

In a lengthy post on X published in January 2025, Mr Fuld asserted that 10 to 15 per cent of the world’s Muslims were “radicalised,” labelled “radical Islam” a “global plague,” and compared Gazan civilians to Nazi-era Germans, claiming that they should be “treated as such”. He also argued it was not “safe to assume that all children in Gaza are innocent.”

 

“The visa holder has posted on multiple platforms and made statements denying credible documented atrocities in Gaza and Islamophobia rhetoric,“ the decision record states.

 

The decision has been condemned by the Australian Jewish Association, which labelled it anti-Semitic and politically motivated.

 

“In light of the fact that the Labor Government is targeting Jewish visitors by cancelling visas, AJA will issue a formal warning to Jews around the world to consider the risks of travelling to Australia,” AJA CEO Robert Gregory said.

 

“There is a real concern that Jewish visitors may have their visas revoked after flights and accommodation are booked.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 3:09 a.m. No.23139132   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23139131

 

2/2

 

Home Affairs officials expressed concern that Mr Fuld’s speaking engagements in Australia — originally set for June 12 in Melbourne and June 16 in Sydney — could become platforms to “incite discord,” pointing to Australian hate speech laws and the risk of heightened community tensions.

 

“I consider that segments of the Australian community would be concerned about the visa holder’s denial of mainstream media reporting of the Palestinian killings and the inflammatory comments made by the visa holder in multiple social media posts,” the decision maker wrote.

 

“I consider there is a risk that those views will be adopted by members of the community and potentially increase the level of hatred against particular segments of the community, namely the Islamic population.”

 

The cancellation was issued under section 116(1)(e) of the Migration Act, which allows for a visa to be cancelled if the holder’s presence in Australia is deemed a potential threat to health, safety, or public order. Because Mr Fuld was still outside the country, the government invoked section 128 of the Act to cancel the visa without prior notice.

 

While the record shows Mr Fuld had previously visited Australia without incident in 2018, officials determined that the volume and nature of his recent online content justified the visa cancellation. The decision also noted that he had failed to disclose his Israeli citizenship on his latest visa application — a discrepancy flagged as a potential breach of immigration obligations, although not the primary basis for cancellation.

 

The cancellation means Mr Fuld will be barred from entering Australia for at least three years, He may, however, apply for revocation within 28 days of being notified.

 

The government acknowledged that the decision could result in financial or emotional hardship to Mr Fuld and event organisers but said these factors were outweighed by the potential risks to community cohesion.

 

“The use of platforms for inflammatory rhetoric can lead to increased hate crimes, radicalisation of individuals and heightened tensions in communities,” the department stated.

 

In a statement following his visa cancellation, Magen David Adom Australia said they would seek to overturn the decision.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/israeli-influencer-hillel-fulds-visa-cancelled-for-australian-speaking-tour/news-story/7927e96c260f4fb77ac7ef59bd39d0c3

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 3:14 a.m. No.23139134   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2144

>>22964042

Muslim Vote to support candidates in NSW, Victorian elections

 

Mostafa Rachwani - June 7, 2025

 

A pro-Palestine political movement that failed to win a seat at the May federal election has vowed to push on and support candidates for the upcoming Victorian and NSW state elections.

 

The Muslim Vote endorsed independent candidates in three Labor-held seats – Watson and Blaxland in western Sydney and Calwell in Melbourne’s north-west.

 

Its greatest success was in Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s seat of Watson, where independent Ziad Basyouny was the second-most popular candidate on a two-candidate preferred basis.

 

Burke, who was accused of “vote buying” after holding pre-election mass citizenship ceremonies in Sydney’s culturally diverse western suburbs, still comfortably won the seat, receiving 66 per cent of the vote after preferences were distributed.

 

In Education Minister Jason Clare’s seat of Blaxland, Ahmed Ouf won 18.76 per cent of first preferences, but the Liberal candidate was second-preferred. In Calwell, Samim Moslih only garnered 6.85 per cent of first preferences.

 

Despite failing to win a seat, Muslim Vote convenor Sheikh Wesam Charkawi said the results were a “significant step” that “demonstrated the model works”.

 

In each seat, the independent campaign ate into both Labor and the Liberals’ first preference vote distribution from the 2022 federal election.

 

“One form of success in the political arena is unseating the sitting minister. Another form is winning hearts and minds of the masses, setting the foundations for future challenges,” Charkawi said.

 

“We’ve had an avalanche of people reach out to us post-election, either to be candidates or to support our work … The community isn’t backing down. We all want to continue.”

 

The Muslim Vote will be supporting Victorian lower house candidates at the 2026 state election, and upper and lower house candidates at the NSW election in 2027, Charkawi said, however their target seats are yet to be determined.

 

Charkawi said he wanted to build on the result, adding the group had NSW Premier Chris Minns in their sights.

 

“We aim to challenge [in] many NSW seats,” he said.

 

Charkawi criticised NSW Labor for its position on the war in Gaza and response to pro-Palestinian protests in Sydney. He said the Minns government had “weaponised police against peaceful protesters, smeared pro-Palestine voices, and pandered to far-right hysteria while Palestinians are slaughtered”.

 

Electoral analyst Ben Raue believed there were some NSW seats the group could contest based on results from particular booths across Blaxland and Watson.

 

Basyouny won more than 30 per cent of first preference votes in areas around Greenacre and Punchbowl, within the state seat of Bankstown. Similarly, Ouf won more than 40 per cent of the vote at booths in the state seats of Auburn and Granville.

 

“There’s potential there,” he said, noting the group would need to move beyond campaigning on a single issue, and engage other communities, as no federal or state seat had a single dominant ethnic community.

 

“They still have some way to go before they can win,” he said.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/nsw/muslim-vote-to-support-candidates-in-nsw-victorian-elections-20250605-p5m553.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 3:21 a.m. No.23139142   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3825 >>2219

>>23120646

>>23120665

>>23125030

‘Dump Jeremy Rockliff to stop election disaster’, senior Tasmanian Liberals, business leaders tell party

 

MATTHEW DENHOLM - June 06, 2025

 

Tasmanian Liberal MPs are under mounting pressure – from senior party figures and business leaders – to dump Premier Jeremy Rockliff to prevent an early election, as MPs blamed the AFL for the state’s political crisis.

 

Federal Liberal frontbencher Jonathon Duniam on Friday described Mr Rockliff’s push to send Tasmanians back to the polls for a second time within 15 months as “nuts”.

 

The state parliamentary Liberal Party is so far standing by Mr Rockliff, who is planning to request a snap election rather than resign, after the House of Assembly passed a no-confidence motion in him on Thursday.

 

Senator Duniam, a leading party conservative, told The Australian the PLP needed to take “whatever steps necessary” to prevent the snap poll.

 

“Unless my colleagues are 100 per cent certain that the voters of Tasmania are not going to punish them for sending them to an early election, they should be taking whatever steps are necessary,” Senator Duniam said.

 

“Going to an election will be a bad outcome. The PLP needs to have a good, long think about this.”

 

Liberal MPs have until Tuesday to do so, with all parties agreeing to pass an emergency supply bill – to keep public services going – before any election call.

 

Some MPs share Senator Duniam’s concerns, with Liberal Party strategists warning it will lose seats and potentially government at any poll. However, most are so far standing with Mr Rockliff, believing an election within 12 months is likely anyway, and preferring to go now with Mr Rockliff as leader than later with a less popular alternative.

 

The Tasmanian Minerals, Manufacturing and Energy Council told The Australian continuity of government was more important than continuity of leader, for investment and business confidence. “Government continuity is first and foremost, as opposed to who is the premier,” said council chief executive Ray Mostogl.

 

“Continuing on the term of the government is the best thing to do.

 

“(An election) just opens up a lot more variables in terms of what the business environment is going to look like.”

 

A second state election within 500 days would have a “big impact” on business, he said. “Expenditure on new infrastructure projects that the government had in the pipeline effectively all gets put on hold. And … it’s risky for any business to proceed with a growth plan that has any reliance on a state government decision.”

 

Political figures on Friday also turned on the AFL, blaming its demands for a $1bn stadium at Hobart’s Macquarie Point – at a time of ballooning state debt – for precipitating the crisis.

 

“I find it gobsmacking that anyone from any club or the AFL central organisation has the gall to tell Tasmania to get its house in order, when its demands on our state have in part brought the parliament to the brink of an election,” Senator Duniam said.

 

“If they’re genuine about wanting Tasmanians to have their own team, then meet us where we’re at: a small state, with limited revenue, a small population.”

 

Some of the AFL’s demands – which include a roofed stadium, precluding Test cricket, a contentious, problematic site, and tight timelines with financial penalties – were “unreasonable”, he said.

 

“I’d love to see a stadium built, but here we are with a (minority) government on its knees and the AFL pretending it’s business as usual,” Senator Duniam said.

 

“They should find the decency to help us find a pathway to a stadium that doesn’t burden us the way their current demands do.”

 

The no confidence motion did not mention the stadium, which the government is fast-tracking outside the normal planning process, but Greens and crossbenchers, who hold the balance of power, cited it as a major grievance.

 

Even MPs who did not support the no confidence motion backed Senator Duniam. “The AFL has failed to acknowledge the turmoil the stadium is causing,” said independent Rebekah Pentland.

 

Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff said the Liberals could avoid an election by choosing a new leader and “by dropping their ­appalling stadium”.

 

Mr Rockliff declined to comment but was still vowing to ask the Governor for an election, once the special supply bill passed on Tuesday.

 

He and Labor leader Dean Winter, who moved the no-confidence motion, blamed each other for the likely election.

 

Mr Rockliff accused Mr Winter of a “power grab”, but Mr Winter said the Premier’s failures and budget mismanagement were behind the motion, backed by the Greens and three crossbenchers.

 

The AFL was contacted for comment.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/dump-rockliff-to-stop-election-disaster-senior-libs-business-leaders-tell-party/news-story/25a27afcc6dbe5655b71d2810cdcc26d

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 7:30 p.m. No.23144364   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4376 >>4424 >>4488 >>2219

Scott Morrison receives country's highest honour for leading Australia through COVID crisis

 

Maani Truu - 9 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Scott Morrison has credited Australians for their "courage and resilience" in the face of crises, including the Black Summer bushfires and a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic, as he receives the country's highest honour for his leadership.

 

The 30th prime minister has been appointed a Companion of the Order of Australia (AC) for his "eminent service" to the country and direction of the national COVID response, as part of the King's Birthday honours.

 

Mr Morrison was prime minister for just over three and a half years — between 2018 and 2022 — a period in which he said, "we were hit with pretty much every crisis you can imagine".

 

"From natural disasters to a global pandemic, once in a hundred years, and of course the threats we faced in our region, and a recession caused by that global pandemic," he said in a sit-down interview before his appointment was publicly announced.

 

"Through all of this Australians were just incredible and the one assumption I made is that that's how they would be — their character would pull them through and that's the basis on which we built the policies that helped us to achieve that."

 

The AC is the highest award in the King's Birthday honour list, designed to recognise achievements "in service to Australia or humanity at large". Former prime ministers are typically appointed, but the time between their service and the recognition varies.

 

Mr Morrison's appointment — three years after he lost the prime ministership — also notes his contributions to international engagement, economic initiatives and national security, particularly through his role in securing the AUKUS agreement.

 

The latter was named by the former prime minister as one of his proudest achievements in office, among other work he said his government undertook to strengthen Australia's sovereignty.

 

"The resilience and sovereignty of the country, whether it was building our resilience against disasters of the future, having dealt with them at the time, our economic resilience, incredibly important, the way we bounced back after COVID was incredible, and we had invested heavily in our small business sector in particular," he said.

 

"It really was about protecting our sovereignty and building that up so we could deal with the significant challenges into the future."

 

Mr Morrison's term coincided with the height of the COVID pandemic, when international and state borders were slammed shut, Australians were locked down in their homes, and thousands of businesses were forced to close.

 

Just months after the emergence of the virus in China, the former Liberal leader made the at-the-time unprecedented call to ban international travellers from entering Australia — a decision that likely staved off the crisis locally but also left many Australians stranded overseas and others separated from friends and family abroad.

 

International borders remained closed for almost two years, only reopening to vaccinated travellers in early 2022 after the Omicron variant had swept the country.

 

During the pandemic, Mr Morrison, along with then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg, also oversaw the creation of the almost $90 billion JobKeeper scheme wage subsidy scheme, one of the largest economic support programs ever introduced.

 

Asked if he had any regrets from that era this week, Mr Morrison said you "don't get everything right, particularly when you face that many challenges".

 

"But I tend not to dwell too much on that, because frankly there was just the next challenge coming the next day," he said.

 

"You do the best job you can on the day and then you shake yourself off the next day and you do it all again."

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 7:31 p.m. No.23144376   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23144364

 

2/2

 

Morrison brushes off secret ministries as a 'redundancy'

 

Mr Morrison left parliament at the start of 2024, more than a year after losing the 2022 election to Labor prime minister Anthony Albanese.

 

The end of his prime ministership was mired in scandal, after it emerged he had secretly sworn himself into five additional ministries during the pandemic.

 

This week he described those secret positions as a "latent redundancy that was never active".

 

"These were unusual times and there were many things we did that were unusual," he said.

 

Since retiring from politics, Mr Morrison has continued to advocate internationally for the AUKUS partnership, which he said remains "as strong today as the day it was announced" despite the arrival of the second Trump administration in the United States.

 

He declined to comment on the current direction of the Liberal Party, which suffered one of the worst election defeats on record last month.

 

But on its future, he said the party's principles remain "as important as they ever have been".

 

"And they are ensuring a strong economy, a strong defence force, guaranteeing those services, responsible financial management — all of those things over the last 70 years and more have meant that Australia is in the strong position it is today," he said.

 

"And for most of that time it has been Coalition governments that have been in government."

 

Some 830 Australians — including Hollywood heavyweights, journalists, and community advocates — will be recognised in this year's King's Birthday honours list.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-08/scott-morrison-appointed-companion-order-of-australia/105380814

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_FAPLWLyuJs

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 7:40 p.m. No.23144424   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4435 >>4488 >>2221

>>23144364

King’s Birthday honours: Scott Morrison says Labor’s weaponisation of Brittany Higgins a ‘new low mark’

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 9 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Scott Morrison has urged the ­Coalition to embrace policies that give people economic choices in life and mount the case that governments in a post-pandemic era can only “treat symptoms for so long before it starts eroding your capacity to have a strong economy”.

 

The former Liberal prime minister and treasurer – awarded a Companion of the Order of ­Australia in the King’s Birthday honours list – said the Covid years had fundamentally changed the way Australians think about the major parties and economic security.

 

Mr Morrison, 57, who led the nation through the pandemic and deployed big-spending policies to insulate the country from economic and health shocks, warned that the goalposts have now ­shifted for political parties who simply promised to fix the budget.

 

Reflecting on massive losses suffered by the Liberal Party at the 2022 and 2025 elections, he ­described a “collision of significant forces”, including the disaggregation of politics that started with the Greens, Democrats and One Nation in the 1990s and has manifested in the rise of Climate 200-backed teal independents.

 

As Opposition Leader Sussan Ley conducts a review of Peter Dutton’s policies and the ­Coalition’s disastrous May 3 election defeat, Mr Morrison said “on issues like economic and national security, I think we (the Liberal Party) still retain, particularly on the latter, a very strong brand”.

 

“But on economic security, I question whether people think about economic security the same way they did before Covid,” Mr Morrison said in an interview with The Australian.

 

“Economic security can equally mean people looking to the government to insulate them from economic cycles, and we’ve seen a lot of that in government policy post-Covid. We had to do it in Covid to save the country but we were also resolute about turning it off.

 

“We’ve become more focused on treating the symptoms than treating the cause in policy. And that’s obviously a mantle for the Coalition to take up now.

 

“It’s not just about being ­responsible financial managers, or being stronger on economic growth and the things that produce that, be they lower taxes (or) sensible and flexible industrial arrangements.

 

“You can’t just say, oh, we’re going to balance the budget. Well, what does that mean? How is that helping me? How does that address the opportunities that I have?”

 

Among other recipients of King’s Birthday Honours are film director Baz Luhrmann (Companion of the Order of Australia AC); his costume designer wife Catherine Martin ( Companion of the Order of Australia AC); Olympian Nicole Livingstone (Officer of the Order of Australia AO); former NSW Police Force commissioner Naguib ‘Nick’ Kaldas (Officer of the Order of Australia AO); media, publishing figure Deborah Hutton (Medal of the Order of Australia OAM); former Business Council of Australia chief Jennifer Westacott (Companion of the Order of Australia AC); and broadcaster, writer Phillip Adams (Companion of the Order of Australia in the General Division).

 

Mr Morrison said the Liberals and Nationals have an opportunity to “make that case again for economic policy that gives people economic choices in life”.

 

“A strong economy is what you need to fund essential services. You don’t have a pension system, you don’t have a hospital system, you don’t have defence forces if you don’t have a strong economy. You can’t take that for granted, and you can only treat symptoms for so long before it starts eroding your capacity to have a strong economy that underpins everything else,” he said.

 

Mr Morrison lamented as a “new low mark” Labor’s ruthless weaponisation of major events during his tenure as prime minister, including natural disasters, Covid and sexual assault allegations made by former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins.

 

Ahead of Anthony Albanese’s first in-person meeting with ­Donald Trump at the G7 summit in Canada next week, Mr Morrison also said Australia must shift from what is “effectively a peacetime operation to a warlike ­preparation” on the pathway to defence spending of 3 per cent of GDP.

 

The co-architect of the AUKUS submarine and defence pact, who recently returned from a visit to war-torn Ukraine, said “there’s a lot of inertia in our processes built up over 50 years or more that were geared to another time, and we need to orientate to a different time”.

 

Mr Morrison, an immigration minister under Tony Abbott who “stopped the boats” and established Operation Sovereign Borders, has been awarded an AC for “eminent service to the people and parliament of Australia” with notable contributions to global engagement, the Covid response, economic initiatives and national security enhancements headlined by AUKUS.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 7:42 p.m. No.23144435   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23144424

 

2/2

 

After more than one in three Australians last month voted for minor parties and independents, Mr Morrison said social media, new communications technologies and the post-pandemic “cultural shock” have supercharged the shift away from the major parties.

 

As the Coalition reconsiders Mr Dutton’s nuclear energy policy and the net-zero commitment enshrined under the Morrison government, the former Liberal leader endorsed the moratorium being lifted and re-adoption of his “all-of-the-above energy approach”.

 

Mr Morrison’s legacies include striking the AUKUS deal and re-engaging the Quad, his government’s management of the Covid pandemic, standing up to Chinese aggression, record mental health funding, winning the 2019 election just nine months after replacing Malcolm Turnbull, strengthening economic, military and diplomatic ties with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Japan and Israel, and securing free-trade agreements with India and Britain.

 

The former MP for the southern Sydney seat of Cook, who entered parliament in 2007 and retired from politics in 2024, amplified other achievements including getting “more than 300,000 Australians into their own homes” via programs Labor has continued and expanded, extracting Australian personnel, citizens and visa holders from Afghanistan in 2021, establishing the Australian Space Agency and Defence Space Command, being an early mover in supporting Ukraine’s war effort against Russia, and implementing the Pacific step-up to counter Chinese influence in the South Pacific.

 

Mr Morrison’s tenure as ­Australia’s 30th prime minister from 2018-22 also featured lowlights, including the fallout from the Robodebt scandal, his government’s handling of Ms Higgins’ alleged sexual assault, China’s trade bans, the furore over his family holiday in Hawaii during the Black Summer bushfires, and Labor’s criticism over him secretly swearing himself into multiple ministries during the pandemic.

 

“The weaponisation of natural disasters, and even what happened over the alleged events in Parliament House with Brittany Higgins, which you know now plays out in the courts, the weaponisation of these things politically by my opponents, both within the parliament and outside it, I think was a new low mark,” Mr Morrison said.

 

“There had been the practice that in times of natural disaster, there’s strong bipartisanship, and I can’t say I enjoyed a lot of that. The weaponisation, whether it was of Covid or of bushfires or other things, when I and my team were out there … the selective attacks that were made were very disappointing, but you had to push through them.

 

“Where I made mistakes, I openly apologised. The tone of politics and opposition politics over that period, I think, set new lows and that continued after I left office, sadly. I hope other prime ministers, when they move on, can have a less eventful time.”

 

On the future of AUKUS, Mr Morrison said the deal he secured with Joe Biden and UK prime minister Boris Johnson had “survived changes of government in all three jurisdictions, and I think it’s stronger today than even when we first announced it”.

 

Mr Morrison said he “appreciated” how Labor had backed the AUKUS agreement and committed to supporting the government in demonstrating to both sides of politics in the US and Britain that “this is genuinely a national initiative”. He also believes there is no “real difference politically (between Labor and the Coalition) in our understanding of what the threat is, but there is a need to adopt a new culture of urgency, not just in Australia but everywhere”.

 

After US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth last week urged the Albanese government to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP “as soon as possible”, Mr Morrison said the request was not being made in isolation to Australia but to all security partners in Europe and the Indo-Pacific.

 

“Sure, numbers of themselves don’t mean anything, but certainly there are a range of programs which have been reprioritised … and a range of other things that could certainly be re-engaged, which would start moving you with the capabilities that have been already keenly researched, and (where) procurements were well advanced. That would quickly make up some space.

 

“And then there are obviously other areas, particularly in the area of drones. I’ve just returned from Ukraine, and the incredible advancing in drone war-fighting capabilities, air, maritime, terrestrial, is just extraordinary.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/scott-morrison-backs-new-coalition-economic-narrative-in-fractured-postcovid-world/news-story/95ed7d5785e38433deb30d2133a3cf9f

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 7:50 p.m. No.23144488   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2221

>>23144364

>>23144424

No regrets for Morrison on pandemic-era actions

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 9 June 2025

 

Scott Morrison has called out blanket vaccine mandates and school closures during the pandemic, defended his creation of the national cabinet and backed big-spending measures that ensured the nation’s economy “rocketed out the other side of Covid”.

 

The former prime minister, who does not regret his government’s call to not bank a surplus at the end of 2019, said hard decisions were made by Josh Frydenberg and Mathias Cormann that helped deliver the “biggest fall in the deficit in Australia’s history of over $100bn”.

 

Reflecting on the pandemic fallout after receiving a Companion of the Order of Australia in the King’s Birthday honours list, Mr Morrison said he opposed blanket vaccine mandates and school closures ordered by state and territory governments.

 

Mr Morrison, whose AC was awarded for his leadership of the national Covid-19 response alongside achievements on the global stage including his role as co-architect of the AUKUS deal, remains convinced the national cabinet model he set up was the “right vehicle”.

 

The former Liberal leader, who had running pandemic battles with premiers including Daniel Andrews, Annastacia Palaszczuk and Mark McGowan over lockdowns and border closures, said the bottom-up, bureaucracy-laden COAG (Council of Australian Governments) forum had become a place where policy issues “went to die”.

 

“Vaccine mandates employed unilaterally by states were not decisions of the national cabinet. Decisions to close schools were not decisions of national cabinet. In fact, on both of those, I opposed them,” Mr Morrison told The Australian.

 

“The only vaccine mandate I ever supported were ones that dealt with people in very vulnerable health situations.

 

“They were unilateral actions taken by states, and it’s for them to justify those decisions that were ascribed to some sort of consensus of national cabinet, which was never the case.

 

“Did all the decisions the states and territories make, were they all good ones?

 

“No one gets everything right, and some of them got less of it right than others.”

 

Mr Morrison, who before replacing Malcolm Turnbull as prime minister in August 2018 spent almost three years running the Treasury, revealed no regrets on Mr Frydenberg’s “back to balance” budget at a time when economists believed the Coalition could have recorded a small ­surplus.

 

After years of work to tighten expenditure and keep spending growth low, Mr Morrison, Mr Cormann, now OECD secretary-general in Paris, and Mr Frydenberg announced the budget was back in balance just months before Covid was detected in China.

 

With ratings agencies keeping a close watch on Australia’s triple-A credit rating during his time as treasurer, Mr Morrison said a “surplus of a billion or so above the mark or below, if the other way, is effectively the same result particularly from the perspective of ratings agencies”.

 

Mr Morrison, whose record spending on mental health was a hallmark of his time in office, said despite his government’s worst fears about the impacts of the pandemic on people’s wellbeing, the rate of death by suicide fell in 2020 and 2021.

 

On the unprecedented economic response, Mr Morrison said Australia’s approach to saving “lives and livelihoods” was world-leading.

 

“I remember being criticised for using the phrase ‘snap back on the economy’. But it is a pretty steep V. When we did the economic supports, with Josh and ­Mathias’ roles in that, JobKeeper was a very innovative policy, and there are many other measures … that rocketed us out of the other side of Covid in a way that I think even surprised us,” he said.

 

“But because we so carefully made sure the measures were temporary and targeted, when we switched them off, we had the biggest fall in the deficit in Australia’s history of over $100bn.”

 

Mr Morrison said the economic rebound, which is credited with helping Jim Chalmers to record back-to-back surpluses, was predicated on programs designed to be “temporary and targeted”.

 

“You turn it on, and then you have the discipline to turn it off.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/no-regrets-for-morrison-on-pandemicera-actions/news-story/25dce22b65e016844ae3a83fac87e115

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 7:59 p.m. No.23144540   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4545 >>2150

>>23139131

US pressures Australia over ban on Israeli-American speaker Hillel Fuld

 

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 8 June 2025

 

1/2

 

The Albanese government is facing diplomatic pressure from Washington after US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee personally appealed to Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke to overturn a visa cancellation of Israeli-American tech advocate Hillel Fuld.

 

The rare intervention came hours after The Australian revealed how the Department of Home Affairs quietly cancelled Mr Fuld’s travel visa and accused him of using social media to deny “documented atrocities” in Gaza, promote Islamophobic views and spread inflammatory content that could incite division amid heightened community tensions.

 

In a lengthy email sent directly to Mr Burke, Mr Huckabee described Mr Fuld as a “highly respected” dual US-Israeli citizen who poses “no threat of any kind” to Australia and urged the minister to allow his visit for “the sake of the very important charity event” organised by Magen David Adom Australia.

 

“Mr Fuld is highly respected member in his community and well known in Israel. While he holds strong views against terrorism and the kind of massacre that occurred on October 7, he would pose no threat to the people of Australia by his actions or words,” Mr Huckabee, governor of Arkansas from 1996 to 2007, wrote.

 

“I fully respect the decision to grant the visa is solely in your hands and you have a sovereign right to make the decision to deny entry to someone you consider a threat to national security (but) I do not feel Mr Fuld poses any threat of any kind. I would respectfully request … you would be willing to review his visa application and grant the opportunity to make his brief visit for the sake of the very important charity event for the humanitarian emergency medical service organisation.”

 

The cancellation has sparked outrage among Jewish groups and prompted criticism from Coalition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie, who demanded answers from the Albanese government over what he described as a troubling precedent.

 

In a statement to The Australian, Mr Burke said the country did not want to import “hatred”.

 

“Australians have a strong view that we don’t want hatred from overseas brought here,” he said.

 

“This power has been used repeatedly over many years by ministers. It is currently being tested in the High Court in the Candace Owens matter. Last term, there was bipartisan support for the use of this power. If that is no longer the case, Mr Hastie should say so.”

 

It’s understood Mr Fuld insists on attending the scheduled events virtually if the visa decision is upheld.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 8 p.m. No.23144545   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23144540

 

2/2

 

Mr Hastie questioned whether controversial political opinions were now considered “a risk to the health, safety and good order to the Australian community” as concluded by the Home Affairs Minister.

 

“The opposition wants to see this power applied fairly and consistently,” he said. “Now that Mr Burke has established a tougher standard for issuing visas based on political opinion, we will hold him to it – especially when it applies to current visa holders stoking ancient hatreds in Australia.

 

“To be clear, we will not let Mr Burke pick favourites in relation to this conflict.”

 

Goldstein MP Tim Wilson also wrote to Mr Burke seeking clarification of any violations to commonwealth or state laws that justified denying Mr Fuld a visa. “It seems denying him a visa is less to do with the substance of his content and more to do with the cause he advocates for,” he wrote.

 

Zionist Federation of Australia President Jeremy Leibler said his organisation was also in direct contact with the federal government and had urged them to review their decision as a matter of urgency. “The decision to cancel Hillel Fuld’s visa just days before he was due to speak is difficult to reconcile with the actual purpose of his visit, which is to speak about entrepreneurship and help raise money for emergency medical services in Israel that treat everyone, regardless of faith or background,” Mr Leibler said.

 

“Whatever one’s opinion is of his online commentary, there is no plausible basis to suggest he would be inciting division by supporting a humanitarian cause.”

 

The Australian can also reveal that the department of Home Affairs made the decision to review Mr Fuld’s visa after receiving a number of appeals from pro-­Palestinian activists. The Department of Foreign Affairs also received several appeals by activists to cancel his visa.

 

In one email to Foreign Minister Penny Wong, an activist wrote that Mr Fuld’s record of spreading “hate speech” and “historic revisionism” was not only “abhorrent” but dangerous.

 

“His conduct poses a serious threat to Australia’s social cohesion, racial harmony, and public interest,” the email stated.

 

Since 2013, more than 2490 people have been cancelled using section 116 of the Migration Act.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/us-pressures-australia-over-ban-on-israeliamerican-speaker-hillel-fuld/news-story/1a010af1b6287f2586c0488ea3831852

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 8:23 p.m. No.23144688   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4701 >>2254

>>22968851

Little penguins loom as a potential torpedo for AUKUS works

 

PAUL GARVEY - 8 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Little penguins could prove to be a big headache for Australia’s AUKUS program.

 

Work on the key infrastructure needed to support the first Australia-based nuclear-powered submarines will be just one broken wing away from being forced to stop, at least temporarily, under conditions imposed on the project by Environment Minister Murray Watt.

 

A single squashed skink would similarly bring work on the all-important upgrades at the HMAS Stirling naval base, on Garden Island off the coast of Rockingham in Western Australia, according to Senator Watt’s decision.

 

Defence needs to carry out a series of upgrades and new installations at HMAS Stirling in preparation for the arrival in 2027 of the first submarines under AUKUS.

 

The US and, later, British nuclear-powered submarines will be based out of HMAS Stirling as part of Submarine Rotational Force West as the program’s first major step.

 

But the wildlife of Garden Island is proving a complicating factor. The main colony of little penguins on the island sits immediately southwest of HMAS Stirling’s main Diamantina pier in Careening Bay, while smaller colonies sit immediately northeast. All of them fall within the main “proposed action area” where the infrastructure upgrades will occur.

 

The order requires Defence to “immediately initiate a stop-works procedure” in the event any little penguin, Perth slider (a type of skink) or marine mammal is found killed or injured in the area, under the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water’s conditions. Defence will also be responsible for arranging veterinary care or assistance “from an experienced wildlife carer” for any native terrestrial or marine animal” found injured.

 

Among other conditions imposed on the work is a ban on dredging or disposing of spoil in Careening Bay during the little penguin’s breeding or moulting periods, “or as otherwise advised by a suitably qualified seabird conservation ecologist”.

 

Maritime works will be allowed to take place only between 30 minutes after sunrise and 30 minutes before sunset “to avoid harm to the little penguins during their arrival, departure and rafting periods”. Lighting from construction will have to be directed away from penguin nesting sites.

 

Defence will also need to implement a noise and vibration monitoring program – “prepared by a suitably qualified acoustic expert in consultation with a suitably qualified seabird conser­vation ecologist” – to ensure the audible disturbances during the works do not cause harm to the penguins and their nesting sites.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 8:25 p.m. No.23144701   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23144688

 

2/2

 

That seabird conservation ecologist will also be responsible for studies tracking the size of the island’s penguin population.

 

“From the commencement of the action until six years following completion of construction, the approval-holder must ensure that the little penguin population is not reduced below its baseline population size as a result of the action,” the approval says.

 

Defence noted it had a long history of working safely alongside the existing Garden Island population.

 

“Defence is currently managing activity at HMAS Stirling to avoid impacts to the penguin colony at Garden Island, and has a long-term monitoring program with a local penguin expert,” a spokeswoman said.

 

“Defence’s environmental measures for construction works on Garden Island have proven effective. The penguin population at Garden Island is healthy and stable and has not seen a decline.”

 

The works at Garden Island are taking place at a time of heightened concern around the health of the little penguin population at nearby Penguin Island.

 

The population there is estimated to have collapsed by about 94 per cent since 2007.

 

That decline has been blamed on a number of factors, including increased visitor numbers to the island, climate change, and warmer sea temperatures.

 

While the penguin population at Garden Island has in contrast been relatively stable, local residents say the Penguin Island experience shows the high vulnerability of the birds.

 

Dawn Jecks, long-time advocate for the Penguin Island penguins who is now a City of Rockingham councillor, told The Australian she was deeply concerned about the cumulative effect of the AUKUS works on the nearby penguin population.

 

“With this whole proposal, everywhere where they want to do stuff there’s penguins and penguin nests,” she said.

 

Ms Jecks said the combination of dredging, construction work, lighting, noise, turbidity and increased traffic and personnel movements could all take a toll.

 

“It really has the potential to significantly impact them,” she said. “Increased traffic near the nest sites can lead to abandonment of nest sites, physiological stress and reduced breeding success.”

 

Work on the infrastructure is slated to begin later this year.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/little-penguins-loom-as-a-potential-torpedo-for-aukus-works/news-story/4d0afe0ee88a02e0c0a1052e3456af47

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 8, 2025, 8:35 p.m. No.23144780   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2222

>>23094571

>>23106961

>>23134204

Former trade minister urges Anthony Albanese not to ‘concede’ to Donald Trump on tariffs

 

RHIANNON DOWN - 9 June 2025

 

The architect of multiple landmark free-trade agreements has urged Anthony Albanese to focus on the nation’s shared history with the US in a potential meeting with Donald Trump, declaring there was no basis on which Australia should be “conceding or negotiating” on tariffs.

 

Former trade minister Andrew Robb, who secured free-trade deals with China, Japan and South Korea, as well as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, said the Prime Minister needed to tell Mr Trump his decision to violate the agreement between the two countries without a phone call was “unacceptable”.

 

As Trade Minister Don Farrell advances negotiations for a free-trade agreement with the EU, Mr Robb said striking a “good deal” with Europe would counter Mr Trump’s protectionist agenda and demonstrate to the US the benefits of opening the world economy.

 

Mr Robb, trade minister from 2013-16, said the move to slap a 10 per cent baseline tariff on Australian exports to the US and 50 per cent on steel and aluminium was unjustifiable considering the two nations’ strong alliance and wartime history.

 

“I find it intolerable that all these things that have been imposed on us have occurred without even a phone call,” Mr Robb told The Australian.

 

“That’s what he should be saying to the President before those open discussions.

 

“We’ve got no need to negotiate on anything, we have been giving, and given to giving.”

 

The former Liberal MP, who also negotiated the Comprehensive Strategic Partnership with Singapore, said there was “no reason” behind the tariffs.

 

Though Mr Trump has complained the US had a trade deficit with many countries and used that as justification, Australia has historically imported more goods from America than it had exported.

 

“You do not treat friends as we’ve been treated,” Mr Robb said.

 

“You don’t make friends into supplicants, and that’s what’s happening.

 

“Where the big does what it wants, and the smaller takes it in the neck.

 

“I think that point has to be made: there is, on no basis, any good reason why we should be conceding or negotiating.

 

“We have done nothing wrong.”

 

After the tariffs reinvigorated efforts to secure an agreement with the EU, Mr Robb said he hoped this time negotiators would be able to resolve issues concerning agricultural market access that had sunk past attempts.

 

“There’s no point doing a bad deal just to get a deal done,” he said.

 

“We have to demonstrate to the US that there is still significant opportunity and also significant benefit from further opening up of our economies.

 

“Both the Europeans and ourselves need to show that we can further open up our economies to one another.

 

“So that’s not … just doing a deal for the sake of doing a deal. It’s got to be a good deal.”

 

The negotiations on an EU trade deal come as Mr Albanese prepares for a potential meeting with Mr Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada this week, when he is expected to raise the US’s request for Australia to lift its defence spending and a carve-out from tariffs.

 

Senator Farrell on Sunday signalled that an EU agreement was in reach, declaring there was a “mood around the world to push the case for less protectionism and more free and fair trade”.

 

“There was a lot of goodwill in the air in Paris last week,” he told Sky News.

 

“I’m confident that if that goodwill continues, that we can secure a new free-trade agreement with the EU.”

 

Senator Farrell said he was pursuing the total removal by the US of all tariffs, and criticised the trade barriers as having “no justification”.

 

Universities Australia has called on Senator Farrell to raise membership of EU-linked research fund Horizon Europe as part of negotiations, after the US paused and suspended funding for Australian research projects.

 

UA chief executive Luke Sheehy met with officials from the European Commission and Australia’s EU ambassador, Angus Campbell, in Brussels on Friday to discuss how the nation could join.

 

International Education Association of Australia chief executive Phil Honeywood said while it was important to progress research collaborations with Europe, the nation had to foster close ties with its regional partners in Asia.

 

“With any move to get close alignment with our European colleagues, we’ve got to be very careful we don’t throw the baby out with the bath water,” he said. “In terms of losing sight of the crucial involvement we have with Asia-Pacific institutions, and the fact that a large amount of our research output is dependent on students from Asian countries.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/former-trade-minister-urges-anthony-albanese-not-to-concede-to-donald-trump-on-tariffs/news-story/1b7c8808fc841e2b88277dcfa71d27c2

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 12:03 a.m. No.23145527   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5529 >>5530 >>5583 >>5597 >>5628 >>2894 >>2910 >>0223 >>2246

>>22927645 (pb)

>>22927657 (pb)

>>22927665 (pb)

Child gender-medicine: Judge critical of Michelle Telfer over gender guidelines, evidence

 

ELLIE DUDLEY - June 05, 2025

 

1/3

 

Australia’s foremost gender-medicine expert and the lead ­author of the nation’s guidelines on gender-affirming care, Michelle Telfer, was excoriated by a Family Court judge for giving ­misleading evidence in support of a mother who wanted her child to be prescribed puberty blockers, in a judgment that has called into question the integrity of treatment of gender-dysphoric children.

 

Judge Andrew Strum, who stripped the mother of custody and effectively blocked the 12-year-old from accessing treatment, criticised the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne for failing to give the child a formal gender dysphoria diagnosis until the court proceedings had commenced, despite having treated the child for six years.

 

The hospital’s chief of medicine, Professor Telfer, he said, cheapened the suffering of victims of Nazism when she suggested a landmark review that recommended limitations on medication for gender-dysphoric ­children formed part of a wave of trans­gender oppression commencing with the Nazis.

 

Justice Strum also questioned the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents, authored by Professor Telfer, for not recognising children may not be capable of making life-altering medical decisions about their gender identity.

 

“It is concerning that an oddly binary approach is adopted in relation to children, especially of the age of the child the subject of these proceedings; that is, to affirm unreservedly those who present with concerns regarding their gender, brooking no questioning thereof,” he wrote in the judgment.

 

“The case of the mother … is that because the child says so, the child is, and must unquestioningly be affirmed as being, female in gender identity. However, that overlooks the obvious, namely, that the child is still a child and not even, if it matters, a teenager.”

 

The judgment, published in April, anonymised Professor Telfer as Associate Professor L and did not name the Royal Children’s Hospital due to statutory prohibitions preventing the identification of witnesses in Family Court proceedings. However, The Australian was on Thursday successful in petitioning the court to name ­Professor Telfer and her place of work, arguing it was in the public interest for the practices of an ­expert healthcare professional and a pre-eminent medical service to be transparent.

 

“Nationwide News submits, and I agree, that the interests of the public are best served by members of the public having access to the entire context of Associate Professor L’s opinion or practice, so that it can be properly assessed,” Justice Strum ruled in approving the application. “Such transparency, including as to that expert’s identity, enables individuals to evaluate critically the validity, reliability and implications of that opinion and practice.”

 

He said maintaining confidentiality over Professor Telfer’s identity “may well undermine public confidence in the administration of justice”.

 

“In the context of applications for suppression or non-publication orders, it is often acknowledged that the proper functioning of the justice system is strengthened by openness to public and professional scrutiny,” he said.

 

“Transparency serves as a safeguard against potential misuse of judicial power, ensuring that justice is not only done but seen to be done, and reducing the risk that abuses go unnoticed or unaddressed.”

 

Justice Strum also agreed with The Australian’s submission that revealing Professor Telfer’s identity would assist parents, caregivers and their children in making informed decisions about their health.

 

“There is a diversity of views, both within and outside of Australia, as to what is appropriate or best-practice healthcare for transgender or gender diverse children and adolescents, with limited evidence about the long-term effects of some of the healthcare options promoted by Associate Professor L, the Children’s Hospital and its Gender Service,” he said.

 

He said the evidence of Professor Telfer was an area of “legitimate public comment, public discussion and public inquiry”.

 

A statement released by the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne said its gender service delivered a “world-leading, multi-disciplinary model of care” which supported the mental health and wellbeing of young Australians.

 

Some experts said Justice Strum’s comments marked the first time someone in high authority had had “the courage to say what is true”, and called on the federal government to better interrogate national frameworks for gender medicine.

 

While Justice Strum did not offer general comment on the treatment model adopted by RCH, he said the impact of that model on a child was of relevance.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 12:05 a.m. No.23145529   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23145527

 

2/3

 

The matter centred on the mother who believed her biologically male child was gender dysphoric, and needed to be prescribed puberty blockers.

 

However, the child’s father wanted to hold off on treatment and “let the child be the child”. Justice Strum in his judgment sided with the father, who did not wish to “pigeonhole” his child, and decided “all options” in the child’s life should be open.

 

In his original judgment, Justice Strum took caution with Professor Telfer’s evidence about the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines, describing her as “the proverbial judge, jury and executioner”, and saying her opinion that they are “best practice” was “essentially tantamount to her agreeing with herself”.

 

“Associate Professor L wrote the first draft and approved the final draft of the ASCTG and it is a work of which she said she is proud,” he wrote. “Insofar as Associate Professor L relies upon the ASCTG, describing it as ‘best practice’, and as the ‘most progressive and trans-affirming guidelines’ in Australia, I approach her evidence in this regard with caution, in the circuitous circumstances where she is the lead author thereof. By way of analogy, it might be said to be akin to a judge expressly relying upon an earlier first instance decision of his or hers as authority for a particular proposition.”

 

He said while they were lauded as the country’s primary standards for treating ­gender-dysphoric children, they did not have “the approval or imprimatur of the commonwealth or any state or territory government, including any such government minister for, or department of health”.

 

Justice Strum took issue with the “concerning” evidence given by Professor Telfer in relation to the landmark UK Cass review, which recommended restrictions on medication for children with gender dysphoria.

 

He said Professor Telfer “disagrees with much” of the Cass review, which “manifestly runs contrary to her life’s work as an ‘advocate’ for the cause in relation to which the Cass Report urges, at least, greater caution”.

 

“It is submitted by the Independent Children’s Lawyer … and I agree, that Associate Professor L’s responses were ‘misleading or omitted findings/material that ­detracted from (their) opinion’ contrary to the obligations as an expert witness,” Justice Strum wrote. “Some of the many examples proffered are concerning.”

 

He also raised concerns over Professor Telfer’s suggestion that “trans people and their families are best placed to know what is in their best interests”.

 

“One is left to wonder how that is so, given the complexity of the expert medical evidence adduced in this case,” he said. “Further, even if that be so, in circumstances where the parents are in disagreement as to what is in the best interests of their child and turn to the court, it is for the court to so decide, based on the evidence adduced.”

 

Professor Telfer during hearings likened the Cass review to the victimisation of LGBTIQ+ people by Nazis in the 1930s, and said it formed part of a “third wave of transgender oppression”. Justice Strum said the characterisation had “no place whatsoever in the independent evidence that should be expected of such an expert”.

 

“It demonstrates ignorance of the true evils of Nazism and cheapens the sufferings – and mass murder – of the millions of the victims thereof, which included, but were most certainly not limited to, transgender people, as well as gay and lesbian people, amongst other groups of people,” he wrote. “I consider there to be no comparison whatsoever.”

 

Justice Strum was highly critical of a practitioner anonymised as Dr N, whose diagnosis that the child as gender-dysphoric was only made “as the pending trial dates approached” and found the timing of the diagnosis was “more than merely coincidental”.

 

“Dr N conceded in cross-examination that the time pressure of the court process was one factor in the decision to conduct a diagnostic tool when she did,” Justice Strum ruled. “However, the Independent Children’s Lawyer submits, and I agree that, albeit one factor, it was a major one.

 

“Without such a diagnosis (or diagnoses), it is nigh inconceivable that the mother could have seriously prosecuted her application in relation to puberty suppression, let alone had any prospect of success. I find that the timing was more than merely coincidental.”

 

Justice Strum rejected the hospital’s gender dysphoria diagnosis of the child. He said the court was “not concerned ‘in what the community thinks’ or ideologies, but only what, on the evidence, is in the child’s best interests”.

 

“Ideology has no place in the application by courts of the law, and certainly not in the determination by courts exercising jurisdiction under the (Family Law Act) of what is in a child’s best interests,” he wrote.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 12:07 a.m. No.23145530   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23145527

 

3/3

 

A statement released by the Royal Children’s Hospital said the hospital was “proud to lead a gender service that delivers a world-leading, multi-disciplinary model of care with a strong emphasis on supporting the mental health and wellbeing of the children and young people referred to our service”.

 

“Our gender service is underpinned by both national and international research methodology. Over the last 150 years, the RCH has been committed to centring our care around the best interest of every child we support,” the statement read. “This commitment remains today.”

 

A Victorian government spokesperson described the hospital as a “world-class health service whose clinical decisions – backed by a comprehensive multidisciplinary model of care – are rightfully made by doctors, not politicians”.

 

“Our gender clinics offer some of the most vulnerable Victorians the lifesaving care they need, and we are proud to support them,” the government spokesperson said. “We know that trans and gender diverse people face significant challenges along the journey of affirming their gender identity, especially when this is met with stigma, misunderstanding and deliberate misinformation campaigns.”

 

Health Minister Mark Butler earlier this year asked the National Health and Medical Research Council to undertake a comprehensive review of the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines and to develop a new national framework.

 

When Justice Strum’s ruling was originally handed down in early April, Mr Butler said he had been “thinking quite a lot” about the issue, and would await the outcome of the NHMRC review which is due to hand down an interim report in mid-2026. His office did not wish to comment when contacted on Thursday.

 

James Cook University academic and psychiatrist Andrew Amos said he expected the review to find “there is no good evidentiary basis for providing puberty blockers, hormone treatments, and certainly not surgeries for gender confused kids”.

 

“I would expect that they would recommend that those treatments not be offered in Australia in the same way that they’re being rolled back across the rest of the world,” he said.

 

Psychiatrist Catherine Llewellyn said a national commitment was required to monitor outcomes in gender dysphoric children, because currently “we really don’t know the medium and long-term effects of what we’re doing”.

 

“Justice Strum’s judgment was, from my perspective, it’s my personal view, was the first time that somebody really examined the evidentiary basis that was being provided rather than relying simply on testimony provided in court,” she said.

 

“I think that that was profoundly important. We need to be able to have a measured, respectful discussion between professionals and with health policy makers around the intense complexity associated with the situation for children. They are extraordinarily vulnerable.”

 

Former Queensland Children’s Hospital senior staff psychiatrist Jillian Spencer said the only way the NHRMC could return a review supporting current guidelines was “ if they’ve been captured by the gender activists”.

 

“We’ve had the valuing of lived experience of adults who have transitioned as adults dictating the care of very troubled and traumatised children,” she said. “We need to return to a scientific basis to our guidelines.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/judge-critical-of-telfer-over-gender-guidelines-evidence/news-story/68ea5feeaf74e52227d3fe534d371409

 

''Re: Devin [2025] - Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia - 3 April 2025''

 

https://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/FedCFamC1F/2025/211.html

 

''Judge lashes child gender-medicine experts in blow for clinic - April 09, 2025''

 

https://archive.vn/W0NEu#22927645

 

''Judgment defines the debate and slams the dogma on puberty blockers, hormones and surgery - Justice Strum’s decision is the best-yet judicial guide to the debate about youth gender clinics - April 10, 2025''

 

https://archive.vn/W0NEu#22927657

 

''COMMENTARY: Is this the beginning of the end for puberty blockers? - April 11, 2025''

 

https://archive.vn/W0NEu#22927665

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 12:44 a.m. No.23145583   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5584 >>5597 >>5628 >>2246

>>23145527

‘Public interest’: gender clinic’s practices should be open to scrutiny, judge rules

 

Michelle Telfer and a Melbourne gender service were lauded for their ‘lifesaving work’ with trans kids. But a Family Court justice has raised concerns about the practice of gender affirming care.

 

CHRISTINE MIDDAP - June 05, 2025

 

1/4

 

Michelle Telfer was a young paediatrician at The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne in 2012 when she was asked to make what would become a life-changing ­decision.

 

A colleague heading into retirement approached her to take on his small number of young transgender patients requiring support for medical transition. It was a tempting offer to work in this developing branch of medicine. “I really didn’t have much experience working with trans and gender diverse young people. I didn’t have any actually,’’ Telfer, a Perth-born former Olympic gymnast and Commonwealth Games medallist, told the Emerging Minds podcast in 2019.

 

“But when I started to meet these young people, I really ­enjoyed it and really felt that it was a worthwhile area to assist in.”

 

Back in 2012, the service received just 18 referrals and Telfer was advised these patients would be a small part of her clinical practice. How wrong that prediction would prove.

 

Each year since 2012, referrals have rapidly grown (to 473 by 2020) and the cause of trans and gender diverse young people has “actually taken over my life’’, Telfer, now one of Australia’s foremost child gender medicine experts, told The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health.

 

She was instrumental in establishing the hospital’s gender service – the country’s first multi­disciplinary clinic for children and young people, which has been lauded internationally – and played a key role in developing Australian clinical guidelines for trans and gender diverse young people.

 

Those say children should drive decision-making around medi­cal intervention and doing nothing, or withholding gender affirming care, was not a neutral option and may increase depression, anxiety and suicid­ality.

 

In The Lancet profile, Telfer spoke of the impact of her work: “You feel you are genuinely helping someone and changing the trajectory of their life just by acknow­ledg­ing how they feel and em­powering them to be that person”.

 

Stigma and abuse

 

Telfer’s advocacy led to young people gaining access to hormone and surgical treatment without approval from the Family Court and as her profile soared, she was hailed as a lifesaving advocate for trans youth and profiled on the ABC’s Australian Story and on the cover of Nine’s Good Weekend magazine.

 

In those stories, her work and courage were supported by a number of patients, their families, colleagues and the Victorian govern­ment, and any questions or criticism around the direction of child gender affirming treatment were largely downplayed.

 

Many journalists and other interested parties understood question­ing the guide­lines inevitably led to accu­sations that they were exacerbating the stigma and abuse directed towards the transgender community and worsening mental health outcomes for vulnerable people.

 

Now Family Court judge Andrew Strum has heard testimony from Associate Professor Telfer and other experts.

 

He has agreed she and the hospital should be identified by name.

 

Justice Strum said airing of the entire context of Telfer’s opinion or practice would enable “individuals to evaluate critically the validity, reliability and implications of that opinion and practice … The mere fact it may be the subject of ongoing controversy and debate does not detract from the public interest in it being made public.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 12:45 a.m. No.23145584   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5585

>>23145583

 

2/4

 

Broader questions

 

The court case before Justice Strum centred on a biologically male child. The mother believed the child to be gender dysphoric and, as a result, should have access to puberty blockers. The father wanted to hold off on treatment and “let the child be the child”.

 

Supported by the independent children’s lawyer, the father argued that the child was gender exploratory and did not have gender dysphoria (distress associated with the discrepancy between an individual’s gender identity and their sex at birth).

 

The child was under the care of the RCH’s gender service and was not one of Telfer’s patients. However Telfer, the former clinic director who became the hospital’s chief of medicine in 2022, was enlisted by the mother to give evidence – a decision that put her under judicial scrutiny in a detailed judgment.

 

Justice Strum emphasised that the case was determined on the interests of the child, not the cause of transgender people or the general model of care.

 

However, through the lens of this case, broader questions surfaced about gender affirming treatment as the judge raised concerns on evidence provided by Telfer and another doctor, and criticised the clinic’s approach to the child. He ultimately did not accept its diagnosis that the child suffered gender dysphoria and stripped custody from the mother.

 

Justice Strum said that according to the evidence from Telfer and another doctor, the gender clinic had a “single approach”. Gender dysphoria was treated with puberty blockers. “No alternative treatment options are offered by the CHGS for gender dysphoria diagnosed there,” he said.

 

Under the gender affirming care model propounded by the clinic, treatment included acceptance or affirmation of the child’s stated gender identity without question. Justice Strum said this was a concerning and “oddly ­binary approach’’.

 

“The view that ‘because the child says so, the child is’ overlooks the obvious: namely, that the child is still a child and not even, if it matters, a teenager,’’ he said.

 

He tested the evidence behind elements of current practice and considered several issues: is a child’s gender identity open to external influence?

 

Should a child seeking gender treatment be assessed for neuro­divergence or underlying mental health conditions?

 

Will a child’s feelings and ­choices change as they grow and develop or is their stated gender identity fixed?

 

“Children may fervently believe, feel and, indeed, wish for many things which may well fall by the wayside as they develop from childhood into adulthood,’’ he noted.

 

Justice Strum said the mother’s case, supported by the evidence of Telfer and another expert was that gender identity was internal and immutable and not open to external influence.

 

“However, neither of those experts was able to point to any empirical or substantive basis for their opinion, but, rather, only to anecdotal reports from transgender adults about their experience of gender identity,” he said

 

Justice Strum voiced concern that the child’s mother, along with Telfer and the expert for the mother’s case, seemed to dismiss the possible relevance of other factors, such as maternal influence or underlying neurodivergence playing any part in the child’s presentation. “I consider that prudence would have dictated that such an investigation be undertaken … and certainly before puberty blockers were contemplated, given the gravity of the issue,’’ he said.

 

While noting the diversity of views on best practice healthcare for transgender or gender diverse children and adolescents, Justice Strum said there was limited evidence on the long-term effects of some of the healthcare options promoted by Telfer, the Children’s Hospital and its Gender Service.

 

He said the evidence of the mother’s experts were, in many respects, at odds with the UK Cass report, which was tendered to the court by the mother’s team.

 

That report urged greater caution in medical intervention and found that the entire field of medicine aimed at enabling children to change gender had been “built on shaky foundations”.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 12:46 a.m. No.23145585   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5587

>>23145584

 

3/4

 

Nazi ideology

 

Justice Strum said the Cass report manifestly ran contrary to Telfer’s life work as an advocate for the cause.

 

He agreed with the independent children’s lawyer that Telfer’s submitted responses to the Cass report were “misleading or omitted findings/material that detracted from her opinion” contrary to the obligations of an expert ­witness.

 

Notwithstanding that she was called as an expert witness for the mother, Justice Strum noted that an expert’s duty to provide objective and unbiased opinion to the court prevailed over obligations to the party that engaged them.

 

He then listed the occasions when Telfer described herself as or agreed she was an advocate for transgender healthcare who was involved in the push to remove the legal requirement for trans and gender diverse adolescents to obtain court authorisation to access gender affirming hormone treatment. “Advocacy in a court is for lawyers, not witnesses, neither lay nor expert,’’ he said.

 

He was particularly damning of her response linking transgender oppression with Nazi ideology.

 

“The emotive suggestion, by an expert witness, that the Cass report forms part of a ‘third wave of transgender oppression’ commencing with the Nazis has no place whatsoever in the independent evidence that should be expected of such an expert,’’ Justice Strum said.

 

“It demonstrates ignorance of the true evils of Nazism and cheapens the sufferings – and mass murder – of the millions of the victims thereof.’’

 

He also touched on the gender clinic’s research. “Associate Professor [Telfer] asserts that the CHGS has a clinical evaluation program in place, as well as a longitudinal cohort study established by it in 2017, which aims to follow up and assess clinical outcomes for 600 patients and families over a period of 20 years,’’ he said.

 

“However, in cross-examination, [she] conceded that the study is not a clinical trial and that there are significant issues with follow-up into adulthood.”

 

Covert pressure

 

Telfer was the first author of the inaugural Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents and approved the final draft.

 

Telfer is proud of those “best-practice’’ guidelines, describing them as the “most progressive and trans-affirming guidelines in Australia”, the court heard.

 

However Justice Strum said he approached her evidence in this regard “with caution”.

 

“As I observed during the hearing … she is akin to being the proverbial ‘judge, jury and exe­cution­er.’ Indeed, in cross-examination [she] conceded that her opinion that the ASCTG is best practice was essentially tantamount to her agreeing with herself,’’ he said.

 

Justice Strum said he gave weight to the opinion of Dr O, a consultant psychiatrist and psycho­therapist and expert witness for the independent children’s lawyer. The court heard Dr O questioned whether the parents and child in this case were likely to obtain accurate and comprehensive answers from the clinic’s paediatricians.

 

Dr O observed there was a tendency for the clinicians to overstate the certainty of the evidence, to underplay risks and to dismiss the possibility of any alternative treatments.

 

She said the clinic had an ideological commitment to gender affirming treatment, which it single-mindedly promoted.

 

“All this suggests that [the child] and parents are not receiving, and will be unlikely to receive, accurate information from [CHGC] [sic] clinicians to enable them to make true informed treatment decisions,’’ her report said.

 

Dr O said the clinic’s communications encouraged social transition and exclusively focused on glowing accounts of youth who had been “empowered” to tran­sition. “Such communications may act as a type of covert pressure on the clinic’s young patients to transition,” she said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 12:48 a.m. No.23145587   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23145585

 

4/4

 

Greater scrutiny

 

The judgment is, of course, a legal response to the evidence in a single case, not a medical one.

 

Telfer and her colleagues have long argued the debate should be led by experts in the field.

 

The Royal Children’s Hospital on Thursday staunchly defended its gender service as a “world-­leading, multidisciplinary model of care with a strong emphasis on supporting the mental health and wellbeing of the children and young people referred to our ­service. “Our Gender Service is underpinned by both national and international research methodology,” a spokesperson said.

 

The Victorian government also offered its strong support.

 

“Our gender clinics offer some of the most vulnerable Victorians the lifesaving care they need, and we are proud to support them,’’ a spokesperson said.

 

But the court judgment comes as greater scrutiny is applied to child gender treatment.

 

Ethical considerations

 

In January this year, federal Health Minister Mark Butler asked the Nat­ional Health and Medical Research Council to review the clinical treatment guidelines for trans and gender diverse children and adolescents, and to develop new national guidelines.

 

“It is imperative there is community confidence that Australian children, adolescents and their families are receiving the most appropriate care,” he said.

 

The move came after the Queensland government suspended use of hormone treatment in new trans public patients under 18 and launched a review into the evidence and ethical considerations of prescribing puberty suppression and gender affirming hormones for children and adolescents with gender dysphoria.

 

In Queensland, a separate investigation is under way after a review into paediatric gender health services at the Cairns Sexual Health Service exposed issues with clinical governance.

 

These developments have caused concern in the trans community and last November Telfer co-wrote a piece published in the Medical Journal of Australia urging politicians, media and healthcare providers to champion gender affirming language and practices and correct disinformation around gender affirming care.

 

Anti-trans discourse was a public health risk, it said.

 

“Based on the best available evidence, the Endocrine Society, American Academy of Pediatrics, and American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatrists recommend gender affirming care as best practice for young trans ­people with gender dysphoria.

 

“Although there is need for more high quality research in this emerging area of healthcare and efforts in this regard are ongoing, existing data support the benefit of gender affirming care on the mental health and quality of life of trans youth.’’

 

Telfer is no stranger to controversy. “One of the things that has been really important for me and my career is learning to be publicly criticised,” she explained in her Lancet profile. “When you work in trans health, you upset people by doing the right thing.”

 

It was a theme in her episode on the ABC’s Australian Story. “There’s always been critics, and you don’t go into this area … without being warned about becoming a target … and I’ve certainly made myself a very big target,” she said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/health/medical/public-interest-gender-clinics-practices-should-be-open-to-scrutiny-judge-rules/news-story/536cc8ee51e01b626e11963dda6505b3

 

https://www.smh.com.au/lifestyle/health-and-wellness/staying-on-her-feet-how-michelle-telfer-won-gender-clinic-battle-20200416-p54kjf.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bT6vQwZYTp0

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 1:16 a.m. No.23145597   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5600 >>5628 >>0223 >>2248

>>23145527

>>23145583

Doctor’s advocacy trumped duty to objectivity in court

 

The public should know why gender-affirming care became the dominant practice in Australia without good quality evidence to support it.

 

BERNARD LANE - June 05, 2025

 

1/2

 

Medicalised gender change for distressed minors, driven by puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, is experimental treatment. Since 2019, jurisdictions as different as Finland, Florida, Sweden and England have independently put these hormonal treatments to the gold-standard test; in each case, systematic reviews of the evidence have shown it to be very weak and uncertain.

 

So, there is no good-quality evidence to claim that paediatric medical transition benefits mental health, let alone prevents suicide. The known risks include brittle bones, cardiovascular problems, loss of fertility, sexual dysfunction and potential harm to the brain. And yet children’s hospitals and clinics across Australia continue to promote “gender-affirming care” as lifesaving. How was this allowed to happen? The public deserve an answer.

 

We know this treatment was introduced as routine, bypassing the safeguard of clinical trials. The innovator was the gender clinic of the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, which launched radical treatment guidelines in 2018. Misleadingly badged as “Australian standards”, these low-quality guidelines have nonetheless become the de facto national blueprint for gender clinicians. There are serious questions whether normal governance processes were followed at RCH — or at myriad other institutions that proudly stated their adherence to the guidelines.

 

Journalists, judges and dodgy suicide statistics helped speed the adoption of this treatment model. Many media outlets, especially the ABC, showcased gender clinics as a human rights cause, failing to scrutinise the “affirmative” approach for coherence or evidence. In the famous 2017 case re Kelvin, the Family Court gave its imprimatur to the incorrect claim by RCH that “advances in medical science” meant the judges could safely wind back their supervision of treatment decisions for minors.

 

Until recently, it was hard to find a single Family Court case in which the judges had decided a child was simply incapable of consenting to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones or a double mastectomy. And then, in April, the court handed down its ruling in re Devin, ordering that this 12-year-old boy be protected from puberty blockers at an unnamed children’s hospital gender service. Justice Andrew Strum’s decision in re Devin is the first detailed analysis by an Australian court of the fundamental flaws of the gender-affirming medical model. He was sharply critical of the doctor anonymised as “Associate Professor L”, who described herself as “an advocate for trans rights”.

 

Today, the judge agreed with lawyers for The Australian that lifting the cloak of anonymity would serve the public interest. Associate Professor L is paediatrican Michelle Telfer and the gender service caught up in the case is the pride of RCH. Parents contemplating a visit to this Melbourne clinic — or any members of the public troubled by an unfolding medical scandal — are entitled to know the target of Justice Strum’s criticism.

 

His account, informed by expert witnesses and case notes, is that RCH did not carry out the kind of comprehensive assessment that might have detected autism in Devin, failed to make a diagnosis of gender dysphoria until the eve of the court trial, and its only treatment was a single medical pathway beginning with puberty blockers — contrary to all its public relations rhetoric about multidisciplinary care.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 1:17 a.m. No.23145600   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23145597

 

2/2

 

Justice Strum chastised Dr Telfer for allowing her trans advocacy to trump her duty as an objective witness in court. He said it was “of considerable concern” that, in defiance of gaps in the evidence, the RCH clinic continued to promote puberty blockers as “reversible”. He found Dr Telfer unable to cogently defend her belief that very young children have an “immutable” gender identity, without which medical intervention is hard to justify. Findings such as these should be known to any parent whose child is offered a referral to RCH. Is the same child-led “identity rights” medicine practised at all the other children’s hospitals and clinics signed up to the 2018 RCH treatment guideline?

 

It is not a personal attack to name Dr Telfer or examine her role. In 2020, RCH claimed The Australian’s coverage of the issues was “targeted, personal, inflammatory and unprecedented,” but could not provide a single example.

 

For some years, Dr Telfer courted uncritical media publicity. She was named in the celebratory re Kelvin ruling. She has been the central figure in the institution of gender-affirming care in Australia. When The Australian began its scrutiny of RCH, Dr Telfer was director of the country’s most influential gender clinic, first author of the de facto national guidelines and president of the activist Australian Professional Association for Trans Health; a recipe for conflicts of interest.

 

Dr Telfer is still at RCH, as chief of medicine, and is still promoted on the gender clinic website. Just as she accepted plaudits in the past, she must be held accountable now.

 

Bernard Lane, a former journalist with The Australian, writes Gender Clinic News.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/health/medical/doctors-advocacy-trumped-duty-to-objectivity-in-court/news-story/47e44e7e4add0d9fd7ddc2bc3596e7e2

 

https://www.genderclinicnews.com/

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=Bernard+Lane

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 1:51 a.m. No.23145628   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5634 >>0223 >>2248

>>23145527

>>23145583

>>23145597

‘Vital’ to know who makes the calls on gender treatment: ex-judge

 

ELLIE DUDLEY - June 06, 2025

 

1/2

 

A former Family Court judge says it is “absolutely vital” jurists follow the example of judge Andrew Strum in making public the names of institutions treating gender dysphoric children, adding that it is critical parents are aware of the range of opinions on the efficacy of treatment.

 

Stuart Lindsay, who presided in the Family Court from 2004-2014, praised Justice Strum’s ruling making public the identity of eminent gender-medicine expert and Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne chief of medicine Michelle Telfer, whom he had criticised for giving misleading evidence in support of a mother who wanted her child to be prescribed puberty blockers.

 

Justice Strum, in his judgment, had also questioned the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents, authored by Professor Telfer, for not recognising children may not be capable of making life-altering medical decisions about their gender identity.

 

“These are cases that involve a highly controversial area of medicine and one that specifically impacts upon children, and one that a lot of practitioners in the area of medicine involved say if it’s not properly scrutinised is capable of doing great harm to children at a particularly vulnerable part of their lives,” Mr Lindsay told The Australian.

 

“So it’s absolutely essential that people involved in making decisions or in giving advice to parents about appropriate therapy for children who might be experiencing gender dysphoria are aware of the range of opinions in relation to the efficacy of the treatment, and especially the dangers of the treatment.”

 

Justice Strum’s judgment, published in April, initially anonymised Professor Telfer as Associate Professor L and did not name the Royal Children’s Hospital due to statutory prohibitions preventing the identification of witnesses in Family Court proceedings.

 

However, The Australian was on Thursday successful in petitioning the court to name ­Professor Telfer and her place of work, arguing it was in the public interest for the practices of an ­expert healthcare professional and a pre-eminent medical service to be transparent.

 

Justice Strum, in approving The Australian’s application, said the “public are best served by members of the public having access to the entire context of Associate Professor L’s opinion or practice, so that it can be properly assessed”.

 

He also said revealing her identity would promote the administration of justice and assist parents, caregivers and their children in making informed decisions.

 

“There is a diversity of views, both within and outside of Australia, as to what is appropriate or best-practice healthcare for transgender or gender diverse children and adolescents, with limited evidence about the long-term effects of some of the healthcare options promoted by Associate Professor L, the Children’s Hospital and its Gender Service,” he said.

 

Mr Lindsay said the reasons Justice Strum gave for revealing the identity of a pre-eminent child gender medicine expert in a ­judgment in which he was critical of her practice would “maintain in ­almost every case of this nature”.

 

“All of those matters about open justice and about welfare of children and about, you know, negating all the risks that are attended upon secrecy of judicial proceedings,” Mr Lindsay, a former Liberal Party member, said. “They’re all going to maintain in similar cases.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 1:55 a.m. No.23145634   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23145628

 

2/2

 

Mr Lindsay said there were sensible provisions in the Family Law Act preventing the identification of parties or witnesses to proceedings, but said it was “no coincidence” the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne “has been at the heart of a substantial number of these cases”.

 

“How does the identification of an institution, in any event, cause any difficulty in … suggesting the identity of a party or a witness to the proceedings?” he said.

 

“I welcome it, I think it’s long overdue.”

 

Federal Health Minister Mark Butler, who this year announced a review into the frameworks surrounding the treatment of gender dysphoric children, on Friday refused to offer fresh comment on Justice Strum’s judgment.

 

Instead, a spokesperson for Mr Butler referred The Australian to a statement he made at the time of announcing the National Health and Medical Research Council ­review. “The NHRMC will develop the guidelines with an expert committee that includes lived experience and will be informed by public consultation, and international work,” the statement from January read.

 

Coalition senator Anne Ruston said decisions “affecting the health and wellbeing of children and young people should be informed by empirical evidence and by our health experts”.

 

“Any concerns about the evidence or standards must be taken into account by the review being undertaken by the National Health and Medical Research Council,” she said.

 

Queensland Premier David Crisafulli, whose government is reviewing the gender-affirming model of care, also refused to comment on the criticism of Professor Telfer.

 

“We are embarking on a review; other jurisdictions, not just in Australia but across the globe, are doing the same,” Mr Crisafulli said.

 

Queensland’s review was announced after a 12-year-old in the state’s far north was allegedly given puberty blockers without parental consent or appropriate medical guidance last year.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/vital-to-know-who-makes-the-calls-on-gender-treatment-exjudge/news-story/86033f3e1e3c9873112cb4a93c5b465c

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/business/legal-affairs/trans-ruling-could-rewrite-the-law/news-story/fc7eb75e377a80222a99b8d82ce4c0d6

 

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1845342692145900

 

https://blogs.rch.org.au/news/georgie-stone-wins-victorian-young-australian-of-the-year/

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 2:44 a.m. No.23145659   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5668 >>2427 >>2222

>>23106961

‘Must be called out’: PM under pressure after 9News reporter Lauren Tomasi shot with rubber bullet during LA protests

 

Anthony Albanese is being urged to confront US President Donald Trump after an Aussie journo was shot with a rubber bullet while covering the LA riots.

 

Sarah Keoghan - June 9, 2025

 

The Greens have called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to seek “urgent explanation” from Donald Trump after an Australian journalist was shot by police with a rubber bullet in Los Angeles.

 

9News reporter Lauren Tomasi was hit while covering street protests that have broken out in LA following the arrests of dozens of people for alleged immigration violations.

 

The moment was captured on camera with Ms Tomasi directly hit in the leg.

 

“You just f*ckin’ shot the reporter!” a protester yelled at the officer before asking whether she was OK.

 

“Yeah, I’m good,” she replied.

 

Providing an update on 9News on Monday evening, Ms Tomasi said, “I’m okay. My cameraman Jimmy and I are both safe.

 

“This is just one of the unfortunate realities of reporting on these kinds of incidents. It has been a really volatile day on the streets of Los Angeles.

 

“There have been a lot of tempers flaring here today and certainly tonight there is a lot of anger in the City of Angels.”

 

In a statement, Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young called on Mr Albanese to hold the US President accountable.

 

“US authorities shooting an Australian journalist is simply shocking,” Ms Hanson-Young said in a statement.

 

“It is completely unacceptable and must be called out.”

 

Ms Hanson-Young, who is also the Greens spokeswoman for media and communication, said the Prime Minister should seek “an urgent explanation from the US administration”.

 

“As Albanese is preparing for his first meeting with President Trump, the first thing he must tell the President is to stop shooting at our journalists,” Ms Hanson-Young.

 

“Freedom of the press is a fundamental pillar of a strong, functioning democracy.”

 

In a statement, Channel 9 said both Ms Tomasi and their camera operator were “safe”.

 

“While reporting from protests in Los Angeles, 9News reporter Lauren Tomasi was struck by a rubber bullet. Lauren and her camera operator are safe and will continue their essential work covering these events,” the media company said.

 

“This incident serves as a stark reminder of the inherent dangers journalists can face while reporting from the frontlines of protests, underscoring the importance of their role in providing vital information.”

 

On X, Ms Tomasi told a follower she was “safe and okay”.

 

In a statement, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said the Australian Consulate-General in Los Angeles was in contact with Ms Tomasi.

 

“Australia supports media freedom and the protection of journalists. All journalists should be able to do their work safely,” the statement said.

 

The PM is yet to comment on the incident.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 9, 2025, 2:47 a.m. No.23145668   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23145659

 

2/2

 

Protesters ordered to disperse

 

Before 10pm Sunday local time, the entirety of downtown Los Angeles was declared an “unlawful assembly” zone, with members of the public instructed to disperse.

 

“Downtown Los Angeles has been declared as an UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY. You are to leave the Downtown Area immediately,” the police department posted on social media.

 

It comes after cars were burned and protesters clashed with police, resulting in the arrests of almost 40 people involved in the riots.

 

Los Angeles Police Department Chief Jim McDonnell said enforcement was “overwhelmed” by the number of people involved in the protests.

 

“As far as people worried about the violence that we’re seeing. The violence that we’ve seen is disgusting. It’s escalated now, since the beginning of this incident. What we saw the first night was bad. What we’ve seen subsequent to that is getting worse and more violent,” Mr McDonnell said.

 

“Tonight we had individuals out there shooting commercial-grade fireworks at our officers. That can kill you. We have adapted our tactics to be able to have a chance to take these people into custody and to hold them accountable.”

 

On Sunday morning, the first members of the National Guard arrived in Los Angeles after Mr Trump ordered 2,000 troops in the city after two days of violence and protests.

 

A new statement from US Northern Command has confirmed that 500 Marines are also prepared to deploy to Los Angeles, should they be ordered to do so.

 

California Governor Gavin Newsom has since come out demanding that Donald Trump withdraw the National Guard, accusing the President of “inciting” more violence.

 

“These are the acts of a dictator, not a president,” he said.

 

Mr Trump posted to the social media platform, Truth Social, to hit back at Mr Newsom as well as Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass.

 

“Governor Gavin Newscum (sic) and ‘Mayor’ Bass should apologise to the people of Los Angeles for the absolutely horrible job they have done, and this now includes the ongoing LA riots,” he said.

 

“These are not protesters, they are troublemakers and insurrections.”

 

https://www.news.com.au/world/north-america/us-politics/must-be-called-out-pm-under-pressure-after-9news-reporter-lauren-tomasi-shot-with-rubber-bullet-during-la-protests/news-story/fb1453530c0260a3f4fc5002f569a102

 

https://www.axios.com/2025/06/08/la-protests-immigration-ice-national-guard-photos

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t42UBBolOvo

 

 

Q Post #4396

 

Jun 3 2020 01:44:26 (EST)

 

God wins.

Q

 

https://qanon.pub/#4396

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 10, 2025, 2:02 a.m. No.23152313   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2315 >>2324 >>2367 >>3812 >>3256 >>2150

>>23099119

Hate-spewing preacher Wissam Haddad’s sword post ahead of court battle with Jewish leaders

 

STEPHEN RICE - 9 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Hate preacher Wissam Haddad has ramped up threats on the eve of his legal battle against Australia’s peak Jewish body, warning in a video “we are not going to come unarmed, we’re going to fight them with everything that we have,” followed by the image of a sword.

 

The video has been condemned by Jewish community members who believe it is an incitement to young radicals to commit violence, with Mr ­Haddad set to appear in the Federal Court on Tuesday to defend claims that he breached vilification laws over his sermons asserting Jews are “vile” and “treacherous” people.

 

The provocative post comes as radical American Islamist Sheik Ahmad Musa Jibril exhorts his followers around the world to help fund Mr Haddad’s defence, with a radical Salafi account linked to Sheik ­Jibril claiming the Sydney-based cleric is “one of the most ­targeted men in Australia by the disbelievers”.

 

Mr Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, is being sued by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry over alle­gations that he breached the Racial Discrimination Act through his sermons in the wake of the Hamas October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel.

 

Mr Haddad or speakers at his Bankstown-based Al Madina Dawah Centre have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing, and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”.

 

In most cases, Mr Haddad has claimed that he was referring to or reciting Islamic scripture.

 

In a new video, Mr Haddad declares that he has “no problem facing the Jewish lobby … but they are the ones dragging us to court. So we’re not going to come unarmed. We’re going to fight them with everything that we have.”

 

At that point the image of a sword appears on screen and Mr Haddad continues: “But if this fighting means that it brings some sort of strength to the Muslim community, and it teaches a Muslim community that we should no longer be bullied.”

 

The image of the sword is then replaced with a raised fist.

 

“Isn’t it about time that somebody fights back? Isn’t it about time that somebody stands up to these bullies?

 

“And this is Alhamdulillah (praise be to God) something that I’m personally willing to do.”

 

The sermon appears to be one Mr Haddad delivered last month but the violent imagery has been newly added.

 

A Jewish community source told The Australian it was his view that Mr Haddad’s use of a sword was summoning his followers to join in a fight – “not a battle of ideas, but a physical battle”.

 

“He’s positioning it as an act of Islamic duty, a religious war ­between Muslims and Jews, which makes it even more alarming and chilling. He doesn’t have mainstream support in his own community, but it has the potential to incite young radicals to commit violence. It’s extremely dangerous.”

 

Mr Haddad’s GoFundMe campaign has raised more than $18,000 although it is still short of its $25,000 target.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 10, 2025, 2:03 a.m. No.23152315   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23152313

 

2/2

 

The exhortation by Sheik Jibril to his tens of thousands of followers to help fund the case comes as an update by the organisers on the weekend declared “This is the silence before the storm” and asked Allah to “make us victorious”.

 

Sheik Jibril, an extremist Michigan-based cleric who preaches an ultraconservative ­Salafist brand of Islam, has called on American Muslims to wage jihad against the “infidel West” and has previously used his platform to call on young people to join the ranks of ISIS.

 

A survey conducted by The International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation and Political Violence in 2014 identified Sheik Jibril and Australian preacher Musa Cerantonio as the most influential online cheerleaders for Western foreign fighters serving with Islamic State.

 

A convicted fraudster who spent eight years in prison, Sheik Jibril was then the most “liked” personality on Facebook among the foreign fighters they tracked and was being followed by 60 per cent of foreign jihadists in Syria on Twitter. Three days ago he urged his followers to support Mr Haddad, writing “may Allah protect him”.

 

The Sheik Jibril-linked account Salaficentral also urged ­followers to donate to Mr Haddad’s GoFundMe campaign, claiming the legal case by the ECAJ was “about silencing Muslims from standing for justice”.

 

“Abu Ousayd is probably one of the most targeted men in Australia by the disbelievers – he’s a thorn in their agenda. They’ll do whatever they can to throw the book at him and find a way to imprison him,” the post states, amid a series of false claims concerning the case.

 

“We asked him directly about the conditions if he refuses to attend their courts, and he confirmed that he would be arrested for contempt of court and likely jailed. The intelligence services will do everything they can to ­silence him.

 

“The conditions set on him include inviting them to the mosque for public gatherings, attending their prayers and places of worship publicly, and never mentioning the words ‘Jew’ or ‘Israel’ in a critical way – otherwise, he faces further imprisonment and a hefty fine.”

 

The ECAJ is simply seeking an injunction requiring declarations that Mr Haddad and the Al Madina Dawah Centre contravened section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act, injunctions requiring the speeches to be removed from the internet and that they not publish similar content in the future.

 

ECAJ is not seeking any damages or monetary compensation.

 

ECAJ’s alleges at least five sermons by Mr Haddad contained almost 40 defamatory imputations such as Jews were “mischie­v­ous and shifty … wicked people who love money, and abuse the weak and target Muslims”.

 

Justice Angus Morkel Stewart has previously said that “upon quick reading” the case against Mr Haddad was “damning”, and pushed back on an argument that certain sermons were protected by section 18D of the ­Racial Discrimination Act which provides exemptions to 18C for public interest rhetoric, given it runs counter to his own judgment in the successful case of Greens deputy leader Mehreen Faruqi against One Nation’s Pauline Hanson.

 

Mr Haddad’s most recent sermons were first revealed in a series of stories by The Australian and prompted investigations from both NSW police and the Australian Federal Police.

 

He is considered a “central ­figure in the Salafi-jihadi network in West Sydney and throughout Australia” by the Middle East ­Research Institute and has boasted of his friendship with notorious terrorists Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar while expressing support for terrorist groups including Islamic State and al-Qa’ida.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/hatespewing-preacher-wissam-haddads-sword-post-ahead-of-court-battle-with-jewish-leaders/news-story/d1e49668f245f4d8fe66ea12914e93cb

 

https://www.instagram.com/abu.ousayd/reel/DKdzYGdJtZI/

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=Wissam+Haddad

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 10, 2025, 2:13 a.m. No.23152324   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2329 >>3812 >>2150

>>23099119

>>23152313

Jihadi preacher’s sermons ‘comfort to Muslim congregants’, court hears

 

JAMES DOWLING - 10 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Lawyers for Jihadi preacher Wissam Haddad have argued his sermons were given to provide private “comfort” to Muslim congregants, despite accusations he was in active dialogue with reporters as a self-proclaimed “masjid (mosque) shock jock”.

 

Mr Haddad, whose first name is William but who is also known as Abu Ousayd, arrived at court on Tuesday ahead of his racial discrimination hearing, avoiding questions and surrounded by his legal team, as he stares down a four-day trial over alle­gations by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry that he breached the Racial Discrimination Act through his sermons in the wake of the Hamas October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel.

 

Mr Haddad or speakers at his Al-Madina Dawah Centre have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”.

 

In most cases, he has claimed he was referring to or reciting Islamic scripture. He sat in the front row of the Federal Court and did not rise or bow to Judge Angus Stewart as proceedings began or were adjourned.

 

The ECAJ, with ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim as the primary applicant, first launched court action against Mr Haddad and his Bankstown-based Al-Madina Dawah Centre in Oct­ober after a failed mediation process in the Human Rights Commission.

 

In a provocative video posted before the hearing Mr Haddad stated that “we are not going to come (to the trial) unarmed, we’re going to fight them with everything that we have”, followed by the image of a sword.

 

Peter Braham, representing Mr Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot SC, said Mr Haddad’s behaviour had “the effect of normalising anti-Semitic prejudices and the expression of them, and (could) encourage acts of violence against Jewish people”.

 

“He makes no distinction between Jews who support Israel today and Jews who don’t. As we will see, in fact, the speeches were just speeches about Jews, ascribing to Jewish people certain negative characteristics, and encouraging his audience to hold those views,” he said.

 

“The intent of the speeches was to persuade an audience that the Jewish people had certain immutable and eternal characteristics that caused them to come into conflict with Muslims.”

 

Mr Haddad’s representative Andrew Boe suggested a judgment against Mr Haddad would unjustly limit freedom of speech and the “boundaries of legitimate debate cannot be set so narrowly as to exclude that which is not polite, bland, (or) muted”.

 

“It cannot be … that Section 18C (of the Racial Discrimination Act) can be contravened because some people in a group have gone out of their way to expose themselves to speech which they might reasonably expect to be critical of Israel,” Mr Boe said.

 

“It would be analogous to a person with a prudish sensitivity seeking out pornography on the web and then complaining about being offended by it.

 

“Mr Haddad’s evidence will be his motivation was to respond to expressions of great distress … by providing historical and religious context on those events in an attempt to provide spiritual comfort to them. That motivation is entirely consistent with the content of the speeches.”

 

He argued Mr Haddad throughout his sermons addressed only historical Jewish tribes referenced in the Koran or the state of Israel and the influential figures within it, not the global Jewish diaspora.

 

Mr Braham disputed this purported intention, and said Mr Haddad knowingly entered a public dialogue with journalists who reported on his sermons, including citing articles by this masthead.

 

“Mr Haddad read these newspaper articles, and as you see in his speech, he responds to them … and he says, ‘Hey, journalists, get your microphones ready, I’ve got more,’” Mr Braham said.

 

He pointed to extracts from Mr Haddad’s speeches.

 

“Today, I’m going to be a masjid (mosque) shock jock, and I want to rub salt in the wound so on Monday they have something to report about,” Mr Haddad said in a speech played before the court.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 10, 2025, 2:15 a.m. No.23152329   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23152324

 

2/2

 

A directions and interlocutory hearing was carried out on Thursday at which Mr Haddad did not appear, where Mr Braham summarised expert evidence set to assess whether Mr Haddad’s sermons were accurate portrayals of Islamic scripture in the public interest and therefore not discriminatory.

 

It is seeking declarations that he contravened section 18C, injunctions to remove the five offending sermons from the internet, and an order that the cleric refrain from publishing similar speeches in future.

 

Mr Wertheim and Mr Goot are also seeking publication of a “corrective notice” on the centre’s social media pages and costs, though not damages or compensation.

 

Both the applicant and respondent have relied on expert witnesses to assess the speeches and sermons of Mr Haddad, with Mr Wertheim enlisting American professor of Islamic studies and theology Gabriel Reynolds, and Mr Haddad calling on Sheik Adel Ibrahim from the Greenacre Prayers Hall in western Sydney.

 

Justice Stewart has previously said “upon quick reading” the case against Mr Haddad was “damning”, and pushed back on an argument that certain sermons were protected by section 18D of the ­Racial Discrimination Act, which provides exemptions to 18C for public interest rhetoric, given it runs counter to his own judgment in the successful case of Greens deputy leader Mehreen Faruqi against One Nation leader Pauline Hanson.

 

Mr Haddad’s most recent sermons were first revealed in a series of stories by The Australian and prompted investigations from NSW Police and the Australian Federal Police.

 

Despite the publicity, he continued preaching and compared the coverage of his sermons with Nazi newspapers during World War II “before the Jewish genocide”.

 

Mr Haddad in a video posted last week said he was concerned Muslim leaders were abandoning their right to quote Islamic texts and had refused him support in his legal battle.

 

He is considered a “central figure in the Salafi-jihadi network in West Sydney and throughout Australia” by the Middle East Research Institute and has boasted of his friendship with notorious terrorists Khaled Sharrouf and Mohamed Elomar while expressing support for terrorist groups including Islamic State and al-Qaeda.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jihadi-preacher-fronts-court-over-incendiary-sermons/news-story/13ce478274dfd8571a67667d8fae2723

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=Wissam+Haddad

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 10, 2025, 2:38 a.m. No.23152367   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2376 >>3256 >>2152

>>23099049

>>23099119

>>23152313

Imam Samir Mohtadi’s hate speech from pulpit

 

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - June 09, 2025

 

1/2

 

A high-profile Victorian Muslim leader who branded Zionists as “scavengers” and “bloodsucking humans” has declared that Australia is waging a war on Islam, as he plans to build a multimillion-dollar Islamic “sanctuary” north of Melbourne.

 

Sheik Abu Hamza, also known as Samir Mohtadi, is spearheading a $6.9m religious development in the fast-growing suburb of Mickleham, where he aims to establish an Islamic facility to cater for the city’s burgeoning Muslim population.

 

But while fundraising millions through his registered charity, the Islamic Information and Services Network of Australasia, Sheik Mohtadi has also launched inflammatory public attacks on Zionists, Australian politicians, the “West” and secular institutions.

 

In a hate-fuelled sermon delivered at the Australian Bosnian Islamic Centre in Melbourne’s west last week, which was attended by The Australian, the prominent imam prayed for victory for “our mujahideen (fighters) in Palestine” and called on Allah to “cast terror into the hearts of the Zionists”.

 

“Oh Allah, grant victory to our mujahideen in Palestine, strengthen their feet, and grant them a clear triumph,” he said in Arabic.

 

“Oh Allah, cast terror into the hearts of the Zionists and shake the ground beneath their feet.

 

“Oh Allah, take away from them the blessing of security, scatter their gatherings, and tear apart their unity.”

 

Sheik Mohtadi’s sermon then turned to Australia itself, as he accused the federal government and institutions of waging an ideological “war of no God”.

 

He preached to worshippers that they were not obliged to adopt the values of the country that had hosted them, granted them citizenship, and provided them full political, social, and economic rights – including the freedom of religion. He declared that as long as they had their own values, culture, language, and religion, they did not need to embrace Australia’s.

 

“There’s a war at the moment that exists in this country which is much more dangerous than the war in Gaza,” he said.

 

“Within this country, we need to understand that the war that exists here, which is much more dangerous (than the war in Gaza), is the war of no God.

 

“They want to instil in our minds that God does not exist. So this is a war of intellect … They want to convey this message through organisations, through governments, so me and you doubt Allah.

 

“They want us to doubt Allah, to doubt the Day of Judgment, to doubt the prophet.”

 

The hardline imam also lamented the removal of religious practices from local council meetings and said secularism was leading Australians into a moral collapse.

 

“Here in councils, at one stage, they used to begin the meeting with a prayer … now they don’t want this to happen. So they want to distance Allah away from our lives, and that’s why the majority of people (in the West) are in a state of loss.”

 

Sheik Mohtadi’s radical commentary comes as he leads efforts to build a mega Islamic facility, dubbed a “sanctuary”, on a 12-hectare (30-acre) site in Mickleham, complete with a mosque, Islamic schools, aged care and sports facilities, as well as a youth services hub.

 

So far, his charity has raised $4.8m of the $6.9m goal, with appeals urging “1000 believers” to donate $3500 each “for the sake of Allah”.

 

“Plant the seeds that grow for generations to come,” IISNA said in its online fundraising pitch.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 10, 2025, 2:40 a.m. No.23152376   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23152367

 

2/2

 

While Sheik Mohtadi has attempted to position the Islamic centre as a community building project, his political rhetoric has intensified in recent months after he called former opposition leader Peter Dutton a “filthy human being”, a “racist” and a “grub” in the lead-up to the 2025 federal elections.

 

Speaking with The Australian on Monday, he defended his right to express his opinions on Zionism while living in a “democratic country”.

 

Sheik Mohtadi declined to explain why he thought Australia was waging a war on Islam, or answer questions about his criticisms of Israel and Zionism.

 

It’s understood the Hume City Council has not yet approved his planned Islamic “sanctuary” development.

 

In a separate social media post on IISNA’s official Facebook page, Sheik Mohtadi declared his outright rejection of the Israeli state and labelled Zionists as subhuman.

 

“We don’t believe in a state called Israel … every righteous human being believes there is Palestine and there is no Israel,” he said.

 

“I’ve always said and I’ve always believed that these Zionists are not normal … They are bloodsucking human beings … They’re scavengers. They are not humans, I swear by Allah,” he said.

 

“Inshallah, they all go back to Russia, Ukraine, America and Britain … and that Palestine is pure from these filthy terrorist Zionists.”

 

He then called on Allah to grant him one final wish: “Oh Allah … give me the ability to pray in Masjid al-Aqsa and to free Palestine from the terrorist Zionists”.

 

Despite these inflammatory statements, IISNA remains a registered charity and has previously secured state support for community events and education initiatives.

 

The Executive Council of Australian Jewry has condemned Sheik Mohtadi’s rhetoric as “vicious” and called for the immediate revocation of his organisation’s charitable status.

 

Its co-chief executive, Alex Ryvchin, said the imam’s statements revealed a dangerous and deep-seated hatred masked by anti-Zionist language.

 

“The sheik gives a demonstration on how those who harbour a deep contempt for Jewish people hide behind euphemisms such as ‘Zionist’,” Mr Ryvchin said.

 

“We have been called bloodsuckers and non-human before. It is a belief that has destroyed millions of lives. He proclaims his desire for a racially pure Arab Palestine entirely cleansed of Jews, demonstrating the violent motives of the anti-Israel movement.”

 

Mr Ryvchin also stressed that silence from within the Muslim community would be concerning and urged Islamic leaders and followers to publicly reject “this hate”.

 

“There should be outrage at these vicious words. It is essential that the loudest condemnation comes from his own followers and co-religionists who should disavow this hate,” he said.

 

“It doesn’t belong here. If the sheik benefits from charitable status which he uses to villainise other Australians, this should be immediately revoked.”

 

Zionist Federation of Australia CEO Alon Cassuto said the claim that most Jews support genocide was a baseless slur.

 

“Samir Mohtadi’s rant is a disgrace, and a dangerous mix of antisemitism, lies, and incitement,” Mr Cassuto said.

 

“Zionism, which Mohtadi attacks, is simply the belief in Jewish peoplehood and the right to self-determination.

 

“This isn’t religious leadership. It’s hate speech, and it has no place in a free, democratic Australia.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/imam-samir-mohtadis-hate-speech-from-pulpit/news-story/ae4e678a32a2dd026ac47cf93168f2b6

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 10, 2025, 2:53 a.m. No.23152427   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2433 >>2222

>>23145659

‘Horrific’: Albanese condemns shooting of Nine journalist in US

 

Amber Schultz - June 10, 2025

 

1/2

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has labelled the police shooting of Nine US correspondent Lauren Tomasi as “unacceptable”, but declined to say whether he would personally raise the incident with President Donald Trump.

 

Tomasi was reporting live from the protests in Los Angeles when an officer appeared to turn and fire a rubber bullet at her leg on Monday morning AEST.

 

Tomasi said she is bruised but otherwise uninjured, and continued working.

 

Addressing the National Press Club in Canberra on Tuesday afternoon, Albanese said he had seen the “horrific” footage and spoken with Tomasi.

 

“[That was] an Australian journalist doing what journalists do at their very best … In LA, it is not unreasonable to think that she would not have been targeted with a rubber bullet,” he said.

 

“[She was] clearly identified as media. There was no ambiguity … We don’t find it acceptable that it occurred.”

 

Albanese said the issue had been raised with the US administration, but refused to say whether he would personally raise the issue with Trump.

 

“I’ll leave the discussions with the president until they occur,” he said.

 

The chief executive officer of Nine, Matt Stanton, said he welcomed an investigation into the incident by the Los Angeles Police Department and would write to the commissioner offering his support.

 

“Our focus has been on providing all the support Lauren and our camera operator James Phillips need in the aftermath of Sunday’s incident. As 9News continues to cover these dramatic and troubling events in Los Angeles for Australian audiences, the safety of our 9News teams in the US remains the priority,” Stanton said in a statement on Tuesday afternoon.

 

“The video footage captured by our team on Sunday showing a projectile fired from a police officer’s weapon was shocking and raised concerns from around the world, with valid questions around what could in any way have justified the actions taken by the police officer.”

 

Stanton thanked Albanese and other members of the government saying their “active and direct engagement….played an important role in ensuring an investigation has been established in such a timely manner.”

 

Nine is the publisher of this masthead.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 10, 2025, 2:55 a.m. No.23152433   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23152427

 

2/2

 

Tomasi has been covering the unrest in Los Angeles, where 2000 National Guard members and 700 marines have been deployed by the US president to help “restore order” following a series of protests against immigration raids.

 

The protests evolved into riots, with cars set on fire and objects lobbed at police. Police deployed tear gas and fired rubber bullets at demonstrators.

 

Speaking on Nine’s Today show on Tuesday morning, Tomasi said her injuries were minor.

 

“I have a bit of a bloody big old bruise, and it’s a little bit sore, but I am all OK,” she said.

 

“It’s a really crappy thing that’s happened. But I really don’t want to be the story … it’s a really chaotic situation that’s unfolding in Los Angeles.”

 

The day of the shooting, Tomasi went live around 5am LA time after “thousands of protesters” appeared on the street.

 

“We felt that presence of the Los Angeles Police Department and law enforcement really ramp up and [we] went live … police started pushing their way up the street. They’d begun firing tear gas canisters and those rubber bullets, and we moved on to the sidewalk, really tried to stay out of the way,” she said.

 

“I was really focused on the camera and was finishing that report … and I got hit. [Cameraman] Jimmy scooped me up, and we made our way out of there as quickly as possible. It was a bit of a shock.”

 

British photographer Nick Stern was also hit in the leg by a rubber bullet, and had to be carried away by protesters.

 

Tasmania Greens senator Nick McKim has called the incident “shocking” and questioned whether the officer’s actions were deliberate.

 

“It certainly looked deliberately done. And if it was, that’s absolutely … a cowardly act,” he said on Today.

 

Minister for Employment and Workplace Relations Amanda Rishworth said journalists should be safe at work.

 

“I understand [Tomasi] is OK and she wasn’t seriously injured, but Australia absolutely believes in the freedom of journalists to do their job and to do their job safely, and that journalists should be protected. And so this is obviously a very difficult circumstance.”

 

In a statement on social media, the union representing Australian journalists said the “shocking” footage was “evidence of the lengths media workers go to report the truth”.

 

“Journalists reporting from the front line of protests and wars fulfil the essential role of bearing witness, and should be accorded the same protections as other frontline workers,” the statement read.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/national/horrific-albanese-condemns-shooting-of-nine-journalist-in-us-20250610-p5m69w.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zq2qHHlD8ew

 

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DKrI_zgNp3A/

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 11, 2025, 2:46 a.m. No.23158064   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8065 >>2224

>>22823269 (pb)

>>23106961

>>23134204

Anthony Albanese under pressure from White House on NSW mining compensation ahead of Donald Trump talks

 

DENNIS SHANAHAN and GEOFF CHAMBERS - 11 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese has been asked to personally intervene in a decade-old $400m compensation claim for Australian and US citizens over a NSW government mining confiscation as part of an upcoming deal with Donald Trump on trade tariffs.

 

As the Prime Minister prepares to go to Canada for the G7 summit and meet the US President on the sidelines of the conference, trade representatives in Washington DC are seeking a resolution to the compensation claim arising from the NSW Liberal government’s confiscation of mining leases in 2014.

 

US trade representatives have repeatedly raised the lack of compensation for US investors as a breach of the US-Australia Free Trade Agreement and listed it as an official “investment barrier” in its annual foreign trade barriers report released in March.

Before Mr Albanese’s expected face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump, US and Australian representatives of “mum and dad” shareholders have appealed to Mr Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell to provide compensation and smooth trade relations.

 

As well as the lack of compensation for US and Australian shareholders who have suffered financially, Mr Albanese has also been warned there are grave concerns about sovereign risk at a time of global trade uncertainty.

 

In a letter sent to Mr Albanese and Senator Farrell on behalf of 50 mum-and-dad shareholders last month, NuCoal resources chairman Gordon Galt raised concerns with the Prime Minister about the need for “proper redress for affected investors”.

 

Mr Galt, who has fought a long-running battle with the NSW government to provide compensation for investors after then-premier Barry O’Farrell axed the Doyles Creek mining exploration licence, warned Mr Albanese that the matter threatened the “nation’s reputation as a safe destination for investment”.

 

Former Labor MP for the Hunter Joel Fitzgibbon, who was a defence and agriculture minister in the Rudd government, said the decision was “a shocker” and had ruined families’ finances.

 

“They are mum and dad shareholders. Their only crime was having faith in a market regulated by the government. Yet it was a government which ripped their hard-earned savings away from them. It’s a shocker,” Mr Fitzgibbon told The Australian.

 

The Australian understands US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer has raised the NuCoal compensation matter with Senator Farrell in their Paris talks last week and in a March phone call.

 

The 40th Foreign Trade Barriers report released by Mr Greer in March warned US NuCoal investors have not been provided with “recourse to seek compensation”. The total compensation bill quoted by domestic and US investors is between $400m and $500m.

 

NuCoal acquired the Doyles Creek mining exploration licence in 2010 for more than $94m and raised $10m from investors. The licence was caught up in a ruling by the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption over links to disgraced former Labor state minister Ian Macdonald, who in 2008 granted the licence to its former owner.

 

Despite years of lobbying, successive NSW premiers, including Chris Minns, have rebuffed recommendations made by a state parliamentary committee that compensation be provided.

 

Mr Minns this year told Mr Galt that while he empathised with NuCoal shareholders who lost their investments, he had a duty to “act in the public interest” and his priority was investing in hospitals, schools and essential public services.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 11, 2025, 2:48 a.m. No.23158065   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23158064

 

2/2

 

In the first Trump administration, Robert Lighthizer urged former trade minister Steven Ciobo in 2017 to resolve the matter and discuss pathways towards providing compensation under the free trade agreement. NuCoal executives also met Joe Hockey in 2016, when he was Australia’s US ambassador.

 

In his May 19 letter to Mr Albanese and Mr Farrell, Mr Galt said “the Australian government has both the authority and the obligation to address this injustice, particularly in light of the AUSFTA”.

 

Mr Galt asked Mr Albanese to “address this matter directly in your upcoming discussions with President Trump, demonstrating Australia’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and respecting the rights of both domestic and international investors”.

 

“Article 11.7 of AUSFTA explicitly prohibits the expropriation or nationalisation of investments without ‘prompt, adequate, and effective compensation’,” Mr Galt wrote.

 

“This provision states that neither party ‘may expropriate or nationalise a covered investment’ without compensation, which must ‘be paid without delay [and] be equivalent to the fair market value of the expropriated investment immediately before the expropriation took place’.”

 

As Mr Albanese and Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, work behind the scenes to broker exemptions from Mr Trump’s tariffs, Mr Galt said “the NuCoal case has implications far beyond our individual losses”.

 

“It raises fundamental questions about sovereign risk in Australia, the rule of law, and our nation’s reputation as a safe destination for investment,” he wrote.

 

“While there has been a recent focus on our fellow American investors, who have also experienced devastating losses, it is important that you understand that about two-thirds of the investors in NuCoal are Australian individuals or managed funds representing many more Australian mums and dads.”

 

The letter lays out four requests, including considering federal intervention to provide “just compensation to shareholders”.

 

In addition to calls for compensation, NuCoal investors have asked Mr Albanese to “recognise that this compensation would not only be just for the affected investors but would also be financially prudent for Australia by potentially averting trade penalties that could cost our economy far more than the compensation itself”.

 

The US Foreign Trade Barriers report cited a 2019 NSW parliamentary committee recommendation that the “NSW government address the issue of compensation for certain investors, including US shareholders, in a mining project whose operating licence was cancelled in 2014”.

 

“When cancelling the licence, the NSW government also passed legislation precluding the payment of compensation relating to such cancellation. To date, the NSW government has not acted on the parliamentary committee’s recommendation to provide shareholders, including US investors, with recourse to seek compensation,” the report said.

 

It also raised concerns about US beef producers accessing the Australian market and revealed the White House was monitoring the mandatory bargaining code and any changes to screen content requirements, the prohibition of US apples and pears, and seeking access for fresh, chilled and frozen pork products.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-under-pressure-from-white-house-on-nsw-mining-compensation-ahead-of-donald-trump-talks/news-story/3c1822cf168d6323bde8dce476ead8e7

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 11, 2025, 3:03 a.m. No.23158072   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8074 >>8079 >>3835 >>4081 >>4845 >>2420 >>6849 >>2152

>>23058421

>>23083142

>>23094549

Australia joins UK in sanctioning Israeli ministers over Gaza comments

 

NOAH YIM and LYDIA LYNCH - 11 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong says there “remains a great deal of strategic alignment” between the US and Australia after the Trump administration condemned the sanctions applied overnight on two right-wing Israeli ministers.

 

Senator Wong did not say whether or not the US was given advance notice that Australia, alongside Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the UK, would impose the sanctions on Israeli national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich.

 

“Was the Trump administration made aware that Australia would be implementing these sanctions?” Senator Wong was asked.

 

“Look, there are occasions on which, in our alliance, we have had differences of views and differences of the approach, but obviously there remains a great deal of strategic alignment across many domains,” she told ABC RN on Wednesday.

 

“In terms of how we deal with this diplomatically, I won’t go into all the detail of that, but you would anticipate that we have engaged with others as appropriate.”

 

The Israeli ministers will face travel bans and have their assets frozen, in a move condemned by Israel as “outrageous”. In a joint statement with other foreign ministers early Wednesday morning, Senator Wong said the two men would be black-listed for “for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank”.

 

“Settler violence is incited by extremist rhetoric which calls for Palestinians to be driven from their homes, encourages violence and human rights abuses and fundamentally rejects the two-state solution,” she said.

 

“We are steadfastly committed to the two-state solution, which is the only way to guarantee security and dignity for Israelis and Palestinians and ensure long-term stability in the region, but it is imperilled by extremist settler violence and settlement expansion.”

 

The Trump administration condemned Australia and others over the sanctions, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying the move will not advance ceasefire efforts, the rescue of hostages, or an end to the war.

 

Mr Rubio urged the five countries to reverse the sanctions, saying in a statement the US “condemns the sanctions imposed by the governments of the United Kingdom, Canada, Norway, New Zealand and Australia on two sitting members of the Israeli cabinet. These sanctions do not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire, bring all hostages home, and end the war.

 

“We reject any notion of equivalence: Hamas is a terrorist organisation that committed unspeakable atrocities, continues to hold innocent civilians hostage, and prevents the people of Gaza from living in peace.

 

“We remind our partners not to forget who the real enemy is.

 

“The United States urges the reversal of the sanctions and stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Israel.”

 

Last month, Mr Smotrich said Gaza “will be entirely destroyed” and that Palestinians “will start to leave in great numbers to third countries”.

 

Mr Ben-Gvir, who has called for Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem to be replaced with a synagogue, last year said: “We must encourage emigration. Encourage the voluntary emigration of the residents of Gaza.”

 

The two ministers, who oppose allowing aid into Gaza, belong to far-right parties which Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has relied on to maintain his coalition government.

 

Posting on social media, Mr Smotrich said he learned of the sanctions while inaugurating a new West Bank settlement.

 

“We are determined with God’s help to continue and build,” he wrote.

 

Mr Ben-Gvir posted on X: “We overcame Pharoah, we’ll overcome Starmer’s Wall,” referring to UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 11, 2025, 3:05 a.m. No.23158074   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23158072

 

2/2

 

The move is seen as a significant break with Washington, which did not join the sanction action, with US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee telling the BBC it was a “huge shock”.

 

“I have not yet heard a good reason for why these two elected ministers have been sanctioned by countries that ought to respect the country’s sovereignty and recognise that they have not conducted any criminal activity,” Mr Huckabee said.

 

“I have a feeling the United States will respond appropriately to what they will see as an incredible overreach.”

 

In the joint statement, Senator Wong said: “Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich have incited extremist violence and serious abuses of Palestinian human rights.”

 

“Extremist rhetoric advocating the forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous. These actions are not acceptable,” the joint statement read.

 

Senator Wong said Australia had “engaged” with Mr Netanyahu’s government on the issue, “yet violent perpetrators continue to act with encouragement and impunity”.

 

“This is why we have taken this action now – to hold those responsible to account,” she said.

 

“The Israeli government must uphold its obligations under international law, and we call on it to take meaningful action to end extremist, violent and expansionist rhetoric.”

 

Senator Wong said Australia maintained “unwavering support for Israel’s security”, adding that the Labor government “continue to want a strong friendship with the people of Israel based on our shared ties, values and commitment to their security and future”.

 

“We will strive to ensure an immediate ceasefire, the release now of the remaining hostages and for the unhindered flow of humanitarian aid, including food. We want to see a reconstructed Gaza no longer run by Hamas and a political pathway to a two-state solution.”

 

Israel’s foreign minister, Gideon Saar, told reporters he had been informed by the UK of the decision to impose sanctions, condemning them as “outrageous”.

 

“We were informed about the UK decision to include two of our ministers on the British sanctions list,” he said. “It is outrageous that elected representatives and members of the government are subjected to these kinds of measures.”

 

Late last month, Anthony Albanese said the aid situation in Gaza was “outrageous”.

 

“People are starving,” he said. “The idea that a democratic state withholds supply is an outrage.

 

“That is my clear position. That is one I have indicated clearly and directly to the Israeli government.”

 

He also condemned Hamas as a terrorist organisation that should “have no role in the future of Gaza or the West Bank”.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/australia-joins-uk-in-sanctioning-israeli-ministers-over-gaza-comments/news-story/a4f41c411d2e444cc3df52e5eae5139e

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VN240diml4U

 

https://www.foreignminister.gov.au/minister/penny-wong/media-release/joint-statement-foreign-ministers-australia-canada-new-zealand-norway-and-united-kingdom-measures-targeting-itamar-ben-gvir-and-bezalel-smotrich

 

https://x.com/SecRubio/status/1932536569107525916

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 11, 2025, 3:14 a.m. No.23158079   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8082 >>2152

>>23158072

‘Entirely unacceptable’: Ambassador condemns Australian sanctions on senior Israeli ministers

 

Paul Sakkal and Rob Harris - June 11, 2025

 

1/2

 

A diplomatic brawl has broken out between Australia and the US after the Albanese government joined with allies in taking the extraordinary step of sanctioning far-right ministers in the Israeli government on the eve of a peace summit in New York.

 

Highlighting Israel’s growing diplomatic isolation, Australia and the UK spearheaded a months-long push to freeze assets and slap travel bans on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich over settler violence in the West Bank and advocating for the displacement of Gazans.

 

Australia announced the move in a statement with Five Eyes security partners Canada and New Zealand and the diplomatically influential nation of Norway, in one of the most striking examples of Western pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to wind down Israel’s action in Gaza.

 

Ahead of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s expected meeting with Donald Trump next week, the US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, condemned the sanctions, urging the countries “not to forget who the real enemy is”, referring to terror group Hamas.

 

Albanese said on Wednesday he did not believe Australia’s relationship with the US would be damaged by his government’s stance, which some within Labor have criticised as not being tough enough.

 

“Sometimes, friends have to be clear with each other,” Albanese said at a press conference in western Sydney.

 

“We support Israel’s right to live and to exist in secure borders. But we also support the legitimate aspirations of Palestinians.”

 

The legal basis for Australia’s sanctions were underpinned mostly by the remarks and actions of Ben-Gvir, Israel’s national security minister, and Smotrich, the finance minister, in supporting the behaviour of Israeli settlers. Settlers seeking to increase Israel’s footprint in the occupied West Bank have been ramping up the building of settlements in the area. The ministers have recently grown in influence as Netanyahu relies on their support to remain in power.

 

At Ben-Gvir’s direction his ministry purchased thousands of rifles for settler communities, where some groups have been dispossessing Palestinians and committing violent acts.

 

Smotrich has also made inflammatory public remarks, including stating that Gaza “will be entirely destroyed” and suggesting Palestinians be forced to emigrate. Last year, he indicated the deaths of 2 million Palestinians by starvation in Gaza might be “justified”, comments that drew rebukes from allies including Germany.

 

But British officials said the sanctions were also designed to pressure Netanyahu to negotiate a ceasefire as humanitarian conditions in the strip become increasingly dire. Hamas has not agreed to release all the remaining hostages.

 

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the international community’s patience had run out, declining to rule out further sanctions on the government of Israel.

 

“The situation in the West Bank and the situation in Gaza are untenable, both for civilians and long-term peace in the form of a two-state solution,” she said in Canberra on Wednesday.

 

Wong gave multiple media interviews and a press conference about the sanctions on Wednesday in a departure from Labor’s more reserved tone on the matter in its previous term of government, when former opposition leader Peter Dutton frequently castigated the government for breaking with Israel.

 

The Israeli ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, said the Israeli government would meet early next week to determine how to respond.

 

“The decision to impose sanctions on two Israeli cabinet ministers is deeply concerning and entirely unacceptable. These ministers are part of a government that operates under the principle of collective responsibility, making such measures unreasonable,” Maimon said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 11, 2025, 3:15 a.m. No.23158082   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23158079

 

2/2

 

Coalition foreign affairs spokesman Michaelia Cash did not make any comments supporting the two most hardline members of Netanyahu’s cabinet. But she did question whether the Magnitsky-style sanctions used by the government were appropriate to impose on a democratically elected government.

 

“We are concerned that there is a pattern of decisions by the Albanese government targeting the Israeli government, rather than Hamas,” she said.

 

The rocky pathway to a two-state solution will capture global headlines later this month at a New York summit to be hosted by French President Emmanuel Macron and Saudi Arabia. Australia has been involved in working groups for the summit, but officials at home and abroad have cast doubt on the prospects of reaching consensus, as diplomats hastily scramble to put together a clear agenda for the gathering.

 

The two-state solution has been key Western policy for decades, but the Trump administration’s ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, suggested this week that the US was no longer pursuing the goal of an independent Palestinian state. Asked by Bloomberg News if a Palestinian state remained a US aim, he said: “I don’t think so.”

 

Under Australia’s Autonomous Sanctions Regulations 2011, sanctions can be applied against individuals responsible for serious violations of human rights, including the right to life and protection from torture. Any Australian found to be dealing with the sanctioned individuals’ assets faces penalties of up to 10 years’ imprisonment or fines reaching $825,000.

 

A leading Palestinian advocate in Australia, Nasser Mashne, said the sanctions were “crumbs, tossed by the Australian government 613 days too late.”

 

“While Australia has hesitated for more than 20 months, Israel has annihilated families, communities, journalists, aid workers, civil infrastructure, every last shred of life in Gaza,” he said.

 

Daniel Aghion, of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, said the two ministers’ behaviour was “reprehensible” and about 80 per cent of Israelis did not support them.

 

“However, if Australia were to sanction every cabinet minister in every government who has incited hatred and violence, we would end up breaking off diplomatic relations with half the world. This measure is an exercise in performative politics,” he said.

 

In a social media post in English, Ben-Gvir said, “While the European colonial countries fantasise that we Jews are still their subjects, the streets of their famous cities are being taken over by radical Islam. But their campaign of appeasement for the Hamas terrorists will not save them.”

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/australia-imposes-sanctions-on-israeli-ministers-20250611-p5m6fu.html

 

https://x.com/MaimonAmir/status/1932593526346559978

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 11, 2025, 3:37 a.m. No.23158114   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8119 >>2224

>>22734120 (pb)

>>22977683

>>23125059

Malcolm Turnbull’s warning for the world as Donald Trump solidifies power in the US

 

Malcolm Turnbull has never hesitated to rip Donald Trump on the world stage, but his latest warning has cut a much bleaker tone.

 

Alex Blair - June 10, 2025

 

1/2

 

Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has thrown the gloves down again, boldly warning the world that Donald Trump risks sending America into a new era of authoritarianism.

 

Speaking on ABC News on Tuesday afternoon, Mr Turnbull cautioned Australia and its allies to prepare for a more volatile international order, urging democratic nations to become less dependent on an increasingly unpredictable United States under the billionaire commander-in-chief.

 

Mr Turnbull expanded on a recent essay he published in Foreign Affairs, arguing that “those countries that share the values for which the United States once stood, but currently does not, should band together to preserve what worked best in the order Trump is intent on burying.”

 

Following Mr Trump’s inauguration, Mr Turnbull has spent much of 2025 calling for strategic independence among Western democracies and a renewed commitment to multilateralism, free trade and stability.

 

He said Mr Trump’s “erratic” leadership has undermined trust in America’s role as a global stabiliser.

 

He also touched on the escalating situation in Los Angeles, where federal authorities have deployed marines in response to anti-ICE protests and arrests of undocumented immigrants.

 

“You can understand Governor Newsom feeling that Trump is trying to provoke a greater crisis there,” Mr Turnbull said. “These are dangerous times in America … There are many people in America now – serious people – who are concerned that America is slipping into a realm of authoritarianism … almost of tyranny. And that should be very concerning for us.”

 

On the flip side, Mr Trump feels emboldened by his election win, which he views as a “mandate” to enact policies he believes will strengthen the US from within. Everything from cutting foreign aid to damaging relationships with long-held partners is on the table for the Republican, who Mr Turnbull believes will flip-flop on just about any deal when he sees fit.

 

“We should honour [commitments] on trade and in particular should be working to expand our free trade relations with other countries that do share our values of free trade, which Mr Trump does not,” Mr Turnbull continued.

 

He praised renewed efforts to revive the Australia–European Community free trade agreement and Emmanuel Macron’s push to associate France with the CPTPP. “In other words, expanding relationships – and a similar approach should be done in defence.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 11, 2025, 3:39 a.m. No.23158119   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23158114

 

2/2

 

On the rising tensions in the Indo-Pacific, Mr Turnbull identified Taiwan as the most likely flashpoint. China has made no secret of its ambitions to usurp the tiny island nation sitting off its shores, which global powers, including Australia, have committed to defend.

 

“It is the most likely flashpoint. I hope it doesn’t ever come to [it]. It has been an uneasy status quo… but defending Taiwan is very difficult,” he said.

 

“Xi Jinping… if he is seeking to take over Taiwan, he would want to do so without fighting.”

 

Turnbull then stressed the difficulty the US would face defending Taiwan.

 

“Taiwan is very close to China… a long way from the United States. This is going to be a very difficult place for the United States to defend in the current environment,” he said.

 

Mr Turnbull has now urged Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to be wary of negotiating with Trump at the upcoming G7 meeting. As we’ve seen in recent months, global leaders tend to be treated like misbehaving children by the current US President.

 

“One of the problems with Trump… is you go along and seek to strike a deal with him – how do you know he will abide by it? He does not regard his word as his bond,” Mr Turnbull continued.

 

Turnbull also dismissed the idea that Australia should sacrifice its Critical Minerals Office access in negotiations. “Hopefully, we’re not going to give them to him,” he said, pointing out that rare earths aren’t rare, but that China currently dominates their processing.

 

“China has greater leverage,” he said. “If the Americans are prepared to make the investment to process rare earths, that would be a fantastic development… a win-win.”

 

On defence spending, Mr Turnbull said he supports a strategic increase but cautioned against simply buying more US equipment.

 

“That very likely is simply going to be making us more dependent… when America is less dependable and less reliable.”

 

“We should be focusing on the capabilities we need,” he added. “Measure the effort by what we actually get for our money – not by how much we spend.”

 

https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/malcolm-turnbulls-warning-for-the-world-as-donald-trump-solidifies-power-in-the-us/news-story/045ea4149889647059c576e9609eda25

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YW0-wJGWxrE

 

https://qanon.pub/#479

 

https://qanon.pub/#908

 

https://qanon.pub/#910

 

 

America’s Allies Must Save Themselves

 

How to Pick Up the Pieces of the World Order Trump Is Breaking

 

Malcolm Turnbull - June 6, 2025

 

https://archive.is/20250606060527/https://www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/americas-allies-must-save-themselves

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 1:25 a.m. No.23163733   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3735 >>3745 >>3758 >>3785 >>3835 >>4081 >>4371 >>4548 >>4595 >>4623 >>4845 >>5018 >>2448 >>2504 >>6828 >>2204 >>2280 >>7965 >>2722 >>2728 >>4931 >>2255

>>22968851

Pentagon launches review of Aukus nuclear submarine deal

 

Ending pact would be blow to security alliance with Australia and UK

 

Demetri Sevastopulo - 12 June 2025

 

1/2

 

The Pentagon has launched a review of the 2021 Aukus submarine deal with the UK and Australia, throwing the security pact into doubt at a time of heightened tension with China.

 

The review to determine whether the US should scrap the project is being led by Elbridge Colby, a top defence department official who previously expressed scepticism about Aukus, according to six people familiar with the matter.

 

Ending the submarine and advanced technology development agreement would destroy a pillar of security co-operation between the allies. The review has triggered anxiety in London and Canberra.

 

While Aukus has received strong support from US lawmakers and experts, some critics say it could undermine the country’s security because the navy is struggling to produce more American submarines as the threat from Beijing is rising.

 

Australia and Britain are due to co-produce an attack submarine class known as the SSN-Aukus that will come into service in the early 2040s. But the US has committed to selling up to five Virginia class submarines to Australia from 2032 to bridge the gap as it retires its current fleet of vessels.

 

That commitment would almost certainly lapse if the US pulled out of Aukus.

 

Last year, Colby wrote on X that he was sceptical about Aukus and that it “would be crazy” for the US to have fewer nuclear-powered attack submarines, known as SSNs, in the case of a conflict over Taiwan.

 

In March, Colby said it would be “great” for Australia to have SSNs but cautioned there was a “very real threat of a conflict in the coming years” and that US SSNs would be “absolutely essential” to defend Taiwan.

 

Sceptics of the nuclear technology-sharing pact have also questioned whether the US should help Australia obtain the submarines without an explicit commitment to use them in any war with China.

 

Kurt Campbell, the deputy secretary of state in the Biden administration who was the US architect of Aukus, last year stressed the importance of Australia having SSNs that could work closely with the US in the case of a war over Taiwan. But Canberra has not publicly linked the need for the vessels to a conflict over Taiwan.

 

The review comes amid mounting anxiety among US allies about some of the Trump administration’s positions. Colby has told the UK and other European allies to focus more on the Euro-Atlantic region and reduce their activity in the Indo-Pacific.

 

One person familiar with the debate over Aukus said Canberra and London were “incredibly anxious” about the Aukus review.

 

“Aukus is the most substantial military and strategic undertaking between the US, Australia and Great Britain in generations,” Campbell told the Financial Times.

 

“Efforts to increase co-ordination, defence spending and common ambition should be welcomed. Any bureaucratic effort to undermine Aukus would lead to a crisis in confidence among our closest security and political partners.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 1:26 a.m. No.23163735   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23163733

 

2/2

 

The Pentagon has pushed Australia to boost its defence spending. US defence secretary Pete Hegseth this month urged Canberra to raise spending from 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent. In response, Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese said: “We’ll determine our defence policy.”

 

“Australia’s defence spending has gradually been increasing, but it is not doing so nearly as fast as other democratic states, nor at a rate sufficient to pay for both Aukus and its existing conventional force,” said Charles Edel, an Australia expert at the CSIS think-tank in Washington.

 

John Lee, an Australia defence expert at the Hudson Institute, said pressure was increasing on Canberra because the US was focusing on deterring China from invading Taiwan this decade. He added that Australia’s navy would be rapidly weakened if it did not increase defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP.

 

“This is unacceptable to the Trump administration,” said Lee. “If Australia continues on this trajectory, it is conceivable if not likely that the Trump administration will freeze or cancel Pillar 1 of Aukus [the part dealing with submarines] to force Australia to focus on increasing its funding of its military over the next five years.”

 

One person familiar with the review said it was unclear if Colby was acting alone or as part of a wider effort by Trump administration. “Sentiment seems to be that it’s the former, but the lack of clarity has confused Congress, other government departments and Australia,” the person said.

 

A Pentagon spokesperson said the department was reviewing Aukus to ensure that “this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the president’s ‘America First’ agenda”. He added that Hegseth had “made clear his intent to ensure the [defence] department is focused on the Indo-Pacific region first and foremost”.

 

Several people familiar with the matter said the review was slated to take 30 days, but the spokesperson declined to comment on the timing. “Any changes to the Administration’s approach for Aukus will be communicated through official channels, when appropriate,” he said.

 

A British government official said the UK was aware of the review. “That makes sense for a new administration,” said the official, who noted that the Labour government had also conducted a review of Aukus.

 

“We have reiterated the strategic importance of the UK-US relationship, announced additional defence spending and confirmed our commitment to Aukus,” the official added.

 

The Australian embassy in Washington declined to comment.

 

https://www.ft.com/content/4a9355d9-4aff-49ec-bf7e-ea21de97917b

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 1:34 a.m. No.23163745   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3748 >>2255

>>22968851

>>23163733

US launches AUKUS review to ensure it meets Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda

 

Brad Ryan and Emilie Gramenz - 12 June 2025

 

1/2

 

The Pentagon is reviewing the AUKUS security pact between Australia, the US and the UK to ensure it aligns with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda, a US defence official told the ABC.

 

But Defence Minister Richard Marles said he remained confident the pact would remain intact, and a review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do.

 

The news follows US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's recent request for Australia to significantly boost its defence spending "as soon as possible".

 

The US defence official said the review "will ensure the initiative meets … common sense, America First criteria".

 

"As Secretary Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs," the official said.

 

Under the AUKUS pact, Australia would be armed with nuclear-powered submarines at a cost of more than $350 billion.

 

Elbridge Colby, who is the under secretary of Defense for Policy and has voiced scepticism about AUKUS, is leading the review, according to the UK's Financial Times.

 

Last August, Mr Colby tweeted he was an AUKUS "agnostic".

 

"In principle it's a great idea. But I've been very skeptical in practice," he wrote, but added he'd become "more inclined based on new information I've gleaned".

 

Mr Marles told ABC Radio Melbourne he was "very confident this [AUKUS] is going to happen".

 

"The meetings that we've had with the United States have been very positive in respect of AUKUS," Mr Marles said. "That dates back to my most recent meeting with Pete Hegseth in Singapore."

 

He pushed back on the suggestion Australia needed a plan B.

 

"There is a plan here. We are sticking to it and we're going to deliver," he said. "Chopping and changing guarantees you will never have the capability."

 

White House 'regularly' reviewing foreign agreements

 

Former ambassador to the US Joe Hockey speculated Mr Colby may have initiated the review himself, suggesting he had "seen the opportunity" when Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reacted dismissively to US requests for more defence spending.

 

"At the end of the day, there is still strong support for AUKUS across the Congress and in the White House," he told ABC Radio National.

 

A White House official told the ABC that the Trump administration was "regularly" reviewing foreign agreements to ensure they fit the America First agenda, especially those initiated by the Biden administration.

 

The Australian government paid the US almost $800 million earlier this year — the first in a series of payments to help America improve its submarine manufacturing capabilities.

 

AUKUS has enjoyed bipartisan support in all three countries, and senior Trump administration figures including Mr Hegseth and Secretary of State Marco Rubio have previously spoken in support of it.

 

But late last month, Mr Hegseth met Defence Minister Richard Marles in Singapore, and said Australia needed to lift its defence spending.

 

Mr Trump himself has said little publicly about the AUKUS pact, and his criticisms of America's traditional alliances have fuelled anxieties about its future in Canberra and London.

 

When a reporter asked Mr Trump about AUKUS in February, he appeared to be unfamiliar with the term, replying: "What does that mean?"

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 1:36 a.m. No.23163748   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23163745

 

2/2

 

Push for Trump-Albanese talks

 

Mr Biden announced the AUKUS deal in 2021, when Australia terminated an earlier deal to purchase submarines from France.

 

Under "Pillar I" of the two-pillar AUKUS deal, the first submarine would arrive in Australia no sooner than 2032. It would be a second-hand US Virginia-class vessel.

 

The US would subsequently supply Australia with between three and five submarines, before Australia began building its own in Adelaide, modelled on British designs.

 

Mr Albanese was expected to meet Mr Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada next week. But that's now in limbo after the US condemned Australia and several other countries that placed sanctions on two far-right Israeli ministers.

 

Mr Hockey said it was important Mr Albanese had a detailed discussion with Mr Trump about the AUKUS deal's benefits to both countries.

 

"By gosh, I keep suggesting to the Australian government in various ways that you can't ignore the Trump administration," he said.

 

"If we do not get the Virginia class submarine in 2032, we have no options left. We have no submarines.

 

"And for the sake of our national security, we need to make sure that we can at least provide some deterrence to potential hostile threats to our nation."

 

Scrapping AUKUS would cause Beijing to rejoice: Congressman

 

Critics of the deal, including former prime ministers Malcolm Turnbull and Paul Keating, have long warned it is unfair and risky. "I've never done a deal as bad as this," Mr Turnbull told Radio National earlier this year.

 

The Greens have proposed a "plan B" defence policy that would eventually see AUKUS cancelled.

 

There are also longstanding concerns around the US's consistent failure to meet its own submarine-building targets to fully stock its military fleet.

 

Connecticut Democrat Joe Courtney, one of the most vocal supporters of the deal in the US Congress, said: "To abandon AUKUS — which is already well underway — would cause lasting harm to our nation's standing with close allies and certainly be met with great rejoicing in Beijing."

 

A UK government spokesperson told the ABC it was "understandable that a new administration would want to review its approach to such a major partnership, just as the UK did last year".

 

In the ABC News Leaders Debate during the election campaign, Mr Albanese was asked whether Australia needed a contingency plan. He said: "No, because this is in the interests of both Australia and the United States, and the United Kingdom as well."

 

The Australian embassy in Washington declined to comment. The ABC has attempted to reach Mr Colby for comment.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-12/aukus-pentagon-review-donald-trump-america-first/105406254

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 1:52 a.m. No.23163758   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3759 >>4623 >>2256

>>22968851

>>23163733

‘Save Australia from itself’: Paul Keating fires up as Trump administration announces review into AUKUS deal

 

Samantha Maiden - June 12, 2025

 

1/2

 

America’s bombshell review into the future of the AUKUS nuclear power submarine deal could be the “moment Washington saves Australia from itself”, former Prime Minister Paul Keating has said.

 

Australia made its first AUKUS down payment to the US in February, transferring nearly $800 million to help boost the country’s submarine production.

 

Overnight, the Trump Administration announced its biggest AUKUS sceptic Elbridge Colby will head a review into whether the US should pull out of the submarine deal with Australia.

 

Former Prime Minister Paul Keating has joined the chorus of Australia’s own AUKUS sceptics, saying the move “might very well be the moment Washington saves Australia from itself … from the most poorly conceived defence procurement program ever adopted by an Australian government”.

 

In a statement, Mr Keating described AUKUS as being “hurriedly scribbled on the back of an envelope by Scott Morrison, along with the vacuous British blowhard Boris Johnson, and the confused president, Joe Biden – put together on an English beach, a world away from where Australia’s strategic interests primarily lie”.

 

“The Albanese government had the chance to undertake a review on its own terms when first elected to office in May 2022, but denied itself the opportunity for fear of being seen as dodgy on the alliance,” Mr Keating said.

 

“Now President Trump’s Pentagon, as it is entitled to do, is subjecting the deal to the kind of scrutiny that should have been applied to AUKUS in the first instance.

 

“The review makes clear that America keeps its national interests uppermost. But the concomitant question is: why has Australia failed to do the same?”

 

Turnbull trashes Aussie sub ‘fiasco’

 

Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull earlier warned the deal risks becoming a billion-dollar “fiasco” for Australia, telling news.com.au that the “terrible deal” inked by Scott Morrison had always included a clause or caveat that no submarines will be handed over unless it had submarines to spare.

 

“So this is a risk that Australia has taken with its eyes wide open,” Mr Turnbull said.

 

“It will be a fiasco, I think. So that’s one alternative. Another alternative is to go back to France. They’ve been double crossed once before.

 

“It is a debacle. I’ve been saying this for years. It was a debacle when Morrison recklessly entered into it, and it was a debacle when Labor, to avoid a political wedge, went along.

 

“It’s fundamentally a bad deal. I’m not saying naval nuclear propulsion is a bad idea. It’s a good idea, but it’s a very expensive one.

 

“But the problem with this deal is it’s so asymmetrical, we give the Americans $3 billion, they only have to give us submarines if they feel they could spare them.

 

“This whole exercise is designed to get us nuclear powered submarines, but the upshot could be that we end up with no submarines at all.”

 

Scott Morrison defends AUKUS

 

Meanwhile, former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has taken to social media to defend the review and urge critics to not “over-interpret” the move.

 

“The current US Department of Defense review of AUKUS is well within its remit and not unlike the strategic assessment recently conducted by the new UK Government following the election of Prime Minister Starmer,” he wrote.

 

“This is a departmental review, not a policy decision, and should not be over-interpreted.”

 

Mr Morrison, one of the original architects of the security pact, said it was a good opportunity for “Australia to make the case again”.

 

“We have a good case to make in both our own interests and those of our AUKUS partners, especially the US.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 1:53 a.m. No.23163759   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23163758

 

2/2

 

All or nothing’ submarine deal

 

Australia’s former US ambassador Joe Hockey said Australia’s defence spending is likely being used by Washington as an excuse to launch a review into the AUKUS pact.

 

Speaking with ABC’s Radio National Breakfast, Joe Hockey said the deal was “all or nothing”.

 

“If we don’t get the Virginia Class submarines in 2032, we have no options left. We have no submarines,” he said.

 

“So this is all or nothing for Australia. And for the sake of our national security, we need to make sure that we can at least provide some deterrent for potential hostile threats to our nations.”

 

“We have something to trade on AUKUS. Not only are we paying for our submarines, not only have we paid forward with a $500m check but an Australian company that most people have never heard of, called Austal, is actually helping build the AUKUS submarines … so not only are we paying for them, we’re helping to build them.

 

“That’s the sort of trade that Donald Trump would not be aware of”.

 

Defence Minister Richard Marles reacts to AUKUS news

 

Defence Minister Richard Marles has broken his silence on US moves to review the AUKUS security pact insisting the US and Australia remained committed to the deal.

 

“The United States advised Australia and the UK of the review,’’ he said on Thursday morning.

 

“It is natural that the Administration would want to examine this major undertaking including progress and delivery, just as the UK Government recently concluded an AUKUS review and reaffirmed its support including through the appointment of Sir Stephen Lovegrove as its AUKUS Adviser.

 

“All three countries are committed to ensuring AUKUS meets national and trilateral objectives.

 

“Importantly, AUKUS will grow both the US and Australian defence industry as well as generating thousands of new manufacturing jobs.

 

“There is bipartisan support in the United States with the passage of important provisions in the National Defence Authorization Act in 2023 to enable the transfer of US Virginia class submarines to Australia, and to enable Australians to work on maintenance activities of US Virginia class submarines.”

 

“Our engagement with the Trump Administration and across the full political spectrum in the United States has shown clear and consistent support for AUKUS.

 

“We look forward to continuing our close co-operation with the Trump Administration on this historic project.”

 

The Prime Minister discussed the AUKUS deal in a phone call with President Trump on February 11 and as recently as May 5.

 

The Deputy Prime Minister also discussed AUKUS with Secretary of Defense Peter Hegseth May 30, just 12 days ago.

 

‘Catastrophic’ move

 

A former top advisor to US President Donald Trump has warned that cancelling the AUKUS pact would be “catastrophic”.

 

John Bolton, who served as President Trump’s national security advisor, told Nine the review is likely aimed at scaling back AUKUS, or abandoning the pact altogether.

 

“It’s more a question of how much of a downsize (of AUKUS) they are looking at, including potentially total cancellation — which would be catastrophic, a huge mistake for the US with enormous consequences for Australia and the UK.”

 

Democratic Senator Jeanne Shaheen warned that Beijing would be cheering at the news.

 

“News that the Trump Administration is considering backing away from AUKUS will be met with cheers in Beijing, which is already celebrating America’s global pullback and our strained ties with allies under President Trump,” Senator Shaheen said.

 

“Scrapping this partnership would further tarnish America’s reputation and raise more questions among our closest defence partners and our reliability.”

 

In a statement, the Pentagon confirmed the review was aimed at ensuring AUKUS served the best interests of the United States.

 

“The Department is reviewing AUKUS as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous Administration is aligned with the President’s America First agenda,” the statement said.

 

“As (Defence) Secretary (Pete) Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs,” the Pentagon said.

 

“This review will ensure the initiative meets these common sense, America First criteria.”

 

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/debaclemalcolm-turnbull-trashes-aussie-sub-fiasco-as-trump-administration-announces-review-into-deal/news-story/c4356fb5a925eb5bd87625cfb2b0935e

 

https://x.com/TroyBramston/status/1932971700846801258

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 2:23 a.m. No.23163785   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3788 >>4595 >>2256

>>22968851

>>23163733

‘Time to wake up’: Turnbull, opposition seize on Trump’s AUKUS review

 

Michael Koziol - June 12, 2025

 

1/2

 

Defence Minister Richard Marles and AUKUS architect Scott Morrison have insisted they are confident the United States will keep supporting the $368 billion submarine deal despite the Trump administration’s decision to review the security pact to ensure it puts “America first”.

 

The United States on Thursday confirmed it was conducting a 30-day review into whether the AUKUS submarine deal should be changed or scrapped, throwing into doubt Australia’s future maritime defence and adding a pressure point to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s expected meeting with US President Donald Trump on the G7 sidelines in Canada next week.

 

Former prime ministers Paul Keating and Malcolm Turnbull, both prominent AUKUS critics, said the US review gave the Albanese government cause to revisit the deal. But Marles downplayed the situation and revealed the government had known about the review for weeks.

 

The United States’ decision to review the Joe Biden-era AUKUS arrangement – which will be examined to ensure it meets Trump’s “America First” priorities – follows its demands for American allies, including Australia, to significantly boost defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

 

Labor plans to lift spending from 2 per cent to 2.3 per cent by the 2030s. Coalition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said there was bipartisan support for AUKUS, but said the Albanese government had to come clean on whether the US had been provoked by Australia’s failure to pour more money into defence.

 

Morrison, who led the deal as prime minister, said the US review should not be overblown. “This is a departmental review, not a policy decision, and should not be over-interpreted,” he said in a statement.

 

Marles matched Morrison’s relaxed stance. “The review that’s been announced is not a surprise. We’ve been aware of this for some time. We welcome it. It’s something which is perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do,” Marles said on ABC Melbourne on Thursday morning.

 

“The United Kingdom undertook their own review when the Labour government was elected there in the middle of last year – and that’s reported, and is in fact very positive about AUKUS … The agreement is for the submarines to come in the early 2030s and that is what we are all working to, and I’m very confident that that is what is going to happen.”

 

The review was first reported on Wednesday (Thursday AEST) by The Financial Times, which said it would be headed by defence undersecretary Elbridge Colby and take about 30 days.

 

“The department is reviewing AUKUS as part of ensuring that this initiative of the previous administration is aligned with the president’s America First agenda,” a US defence official confirmed to this masthead.

 

“As [Defence] Secretary [Pete] Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs.”

 

A separate US government official said: “The Trump administration is regularly reviewing foreign agreements to ensure they align with the American people’s interests, especially those initiated under the failed Biden foreign policy agenda.”

 

Taylor warned that Australia would “pay a heavy price” if AUKUS fell over as he pushed the Albanese government to escalate its defence spending to be closer in line with American asks.

 

“The Coalition stands ready to work with Labor to make sure that AUKUS is a success. It needs to be strong and it needs to be effective, but bipartisanship will not be a shield for inaction,” he said.

 

Critics made the opposite case. Keating said the review gave Australia an opportunity to forge a new path on national security and accused the Labor government of avoiding its own review “for fear of being seen as dodgy on the alliance”.

 

“AUKUS will be shown for it always has been: a deal hurriedly scribbled on the back of an envelope by Scott Morrison, along with the vacuous British blowhard Boris Johnson and the confused president, Joe Biden,” he said in a statement.

 

“The usual American apologists are already out in the press today insisting that the prime minister leaves his meeting with Trump on the weekend with a guarantee that AUKUS survives. It is an impossible ask.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 2:25 a.m. No.23163788   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23163785

 

2/2

 

Turnbull also questioned why Australia had not reviewed the scheme. “The UK is conducting a review of AUKUS. The US … is conducting a review of AUKUS,” he said on X. “But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed. Time to wake up?”

 

Marles said that Labor’s broad defence strategic review, commissioned when it came to government, had sufficiently probed the AUKUS deal as he told critics “to take a deep breath”.

 

Morrison said the original case for AUKUS had been built on convincing the US and UK defence institutions – including in the first Trump administration – of the pact’s technical merit, sovereign capability and shared security interests.

 

“It has enjoyed bipartisan and institutional support in both Washington and London from the outset. That foundation matters and was important to secure,” he said. “Now is the time for Australia to make the case again. We have a good case to make in both our own interests and those of our AUKUS partners, especially in the US.”

 

British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer last month declared the AUKUS defence pact the centrepiece of his government’s national security strategy, and a UK government spokesperson on Thursday said AUKUS was “one of the most strategically important partnerships in decades”.

 

“It is understandable that a new administration would want to review its approach to such a major partnership, just as the UK did last year,” they said. “The UK will continue to work closely with the US and Australia at all levels to maximise the benefits and opportunities which AUKUS presents for our three nations.”

 

Australian government sources, who downplayed the news, said the government learnt about the review before Marles met US defence secretary Pete Hegseth at the Shangri-La Dialogue at the end of last month.

 

One MP pointed out the US review was instigated by Colby, who has been heavily focused on AUKUS, but said others high up in the administration did not share his scepticism.

 

Colby has previously called himself an AUKUS sceptic and last year said it would be “crazy” if the arrangement resulted in nuclear-powered submarines going to the wrong places at the wrong time. Of particular concern is the US’ lagging rate of submarine production and failure to meet its own needs. As part of the AUKUS deal, the president of the day can refuse to release a boat to Australia if it is required for American defence priorities.

 

However, Colby expressed more optimism about AUKUS at his confirmation hearing earlier this year, saying he wanted to remove red tape and barriers to submarine production so that the partnership could be expedited.

 

Under the first pillar of the pact, Australia would purchase three to five nuclear-powered submarines from the US, starting in the 2030s, and build more through a joint initiative with the US and UK. Under the second pillar, the three nations would collaborate on advanced defence technologies.

 

Australia is also contributing at least $US3 billion ($4.6 billion) to the US defence industrial base to shore up submarine production; $800 million has already been paid.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/aukus-in-doubt-as-us-starts-review-into-whether-the-deal-is-america-first-20250612-p5m6rn.html

 

https://x.com/TurnbullMalcolm/status/1932910050043179255

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 2:41 a.m. No.23163812   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2155

>>23152313

>>23152324

Jihadi preacher concedes ‘sermons not private’ in hate speech case

 

Wissam Haddad has acknowledged his sermons on Jews after October 7 could be accessed broadly and would not stay confined to his Bankstown prayer centre.

 

JAMES DOWLING - June 12, 2025

 

Lawyers for Jihadi preacher Wissam Haddad have conceded a central pillar of their defence, acknowledging the cleric’s sermons were not private amid a racial discrimination trial that has hinged on the public accessibility of his remarks.

 

Mr Haddad, who legally changed his first name to William more than twenty years ago but who is also known as Abu Ousayd, has sought to argue he was only speaking to his Muslim congregants at the Bankstown Al Madina Dawah Centre – a co-respondent in his Federal Court case brought by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot – when he made sermons about the conflict in Israel after October 7, 2023.

 

At the beginning of the case’s closing remarks on Thursday, ECAJ barrister Peter Braham SC said Mr Haddad had conceded the argument and acknowledged his speeches were likely to be seen by an audience outside of his congregation.

 

Mr Haddad’s barrister, Andrew Boe, confirmed this.

 

“We formally communicated to the appellant’s team that the respondents concede that the speeches were not … private,” Mr Boe said.

 

The partial concession means Justice Angus Stewart need only judge Mr Haddad’s potential breach of two other elements of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act – whether Mr Haddad’s sermons were likely to offend and whether they targeted those of a specific race, colour or national or ethnic origin.

 

Mr Haddad took to the witness box on Wednesday, defending his preachings in the face of Mr Braham’s suggestion he was a wannabe influencer who “revelled” in “flippant ­provocations”.

 

The wide-ranging cross-examination presented Mr Haddad with a patchwork of alleged media stunts he conducted in the lead-up to five speeches about Jews that provoked the legal action, which Mr Braham contended indicated a pattern of willing and incendiary public dialogue by Mr Haddad.

 

He told the Federal Court he “never set out to insult Jews” when he recited parables about their killing and made sermons at his Bankstown prayer centre in Sydney’s southwest calling them treacherous and vile.

 

“I never set out to insult Jews,” he said. “The words of Allah are eternal, so whatever He said then holds now, but specifically for Jews of faith, not ethnicity.”

 

Probing this defence, Mr Braham at one stage asked Mr Haddad why he had parroted an anti-Semitic trope suggesting Jewish cabalists controlled mass media and Hollywood, with Mr Haddad saying he had been referencing the Israeli government.

 

“Jews of the Israeli government don’t have Hollywood blockbuster films, Mr Haddad, Hollywood’s in Los Angeles in America,” Mr Braham said.

 

Mr Haddad told the barrister he “wouldn’t have a clue” where Hollywood was because he had “never been to the States”.

 

It was part of a series of stipulations he made in the witness box about his prior sermons, suggesting remarks that seemingly applied to the entire Jewish diaspora were rather about Jews who practised their faith or specific indictments of senior Israeli government figures. His audience of Muslim congregants would understand these stipulations implicitly, the court heard.

 

He has repeatedly said his remarks were pulled from Islamic scripture.

 

“A very large part of the respondent’s case here is that these speeches were delivered in private to a purely Muslim audience, and it wasn’t reasonably likely that they would come to the attention of the broader community, and that is absolutely not how this man has run his life,” Mr Braham said.

 

“It’s put forward by the respondent that the purpose for which the speech was given was a serious discussion of current affairs, but this is not a man, in our submission, who engages in serious discussions.

 

“A very large part of the respondent’s case here is that these speeches were delivered in private to a purely Muslim audience, and it wasn’t reasonably likely that they would come to the attention of the broader community, and that is absolutely not how this man has run his life.

 

“He’s a man who engages in flippant provocations of other segments of the community … and that’s how he gains attention.”

 

ECAJ is seeking declarations that Mr Haddad contravened section 18C, injunctions to remove the five offending sermons from the internet, and an order that the cleric refrain from publishing similar speeches in future.

 

The trial will conclude on Friday before Justice Stewart retires to consider his judgement.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/jihadi-preacher-concedes-sermons-not-private-in-hate-speech-case/news-story/e71f5793b2413ea60417ad1418d4e121

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 2:49 a.m. No.23163825   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3829 >>2429 >>2224

>>23120646

>>23125030

>>23139142

Battlelines drawn as Governor approves July 19 Tasmanian election

 

MATTHEW DENHOLM - June 11, 2025

 

1/2

 

Tasmanians will go to the polls on July 19 – for the second time in 16 months – after the state’s Governor on Wednesday night ­finally agreed to the early election requested by Premier Jeremy Rockliff.

 

The election – Tasmania’s fourth in a little over seven years – follows an extended power vacuum after Mr Rockliff last week suffered a no-confidence motion in the House of Assembly.

 

Governor Barbara Baker, who on Tuesday night deferred a decision on Mr Rockliff’s election request, said she had ­decided there was no real alternative. “Notwithstanding the recent 2024 election, the public interest in avoiding the cost of another election and the prevailing public mood against holding an election, I have granted Premier Rockliff a dissolution,” Ms Baker said.

 

“I make this grant because I am satisfied that there is no real possibility that an alternative government can be formed.”

 

Mr Rockliff welcomed the ­decision. “A state election has been called for July 19 – one that we’re going to fight in the name of common decency,” he said via social media.

 

“To draw a line in the sand, as Tasmanians, and stand up for what we believe in. Not political games. But building a better Tasmania.

 

“Your support over these last few days has been nothing short of incredible. I have been truly humbled. Now let’s get on with it.”

 

Labor leader Dean Winter said Tasmanians now had “a choice”, flagging a campaign ­attack based on Mr Rockliff’s abandoned privatisation agenda.

 

“The Liberals want to sell off Tasmania, while Labor will keep Tasmania in Tasmanian hands,” Mr Winter said. “Selling off Tasmania means higher prices for power, public transport, and other essentials.

 

“Only a vote for Labor will ­ensure Tasmanian profits stay in Tasmania, investing in schools, health, and housing. Our entire labour movement is united and ready to send the Liberals a loud message – Tasmania is not for sale.

 

“It’s time for a fresh start for Tasmania.”

 

There had been pressure within the Liberal Party and the business community for Mr Rockliff to resign to allow the party to choose another leader and avoid the snap poll.

 

However, Mr Rockliff refused to quit and despite several senior ministers being willing to take his place, none were willing to force a spill of the leadership.

 

The Liberal government, in power since 2014, most recently in a weakened minority administration since March 2024, faces an uphill battle to retain power.

 

It has taken the state deeply into state debt, recently unveiling a budget doubling net debt to almost $11bn by 2028, while being plagued by allegations of bungled infrastructure projects.

 

The most notable of these was the failure to build adequate wharf facilities for $1bn new Bass Strait ferries, and alleged mishandling of the contentious $1bn Hobart AFL stadium.

 

Both major parties are committed to the stadium – a key condition of Tasmania gaining an AFL team.

 

However, the election casts further doubt over the project’s future, given delays to legislation fast-tracking the project and uncertainty over the make-up of any crossbench, with few ­pundits predicting a majority government.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 2:50 a.m. No.23163829   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23163825

 

2/2

 

Labor is ahead in the polls for the first time in years, but has a new, untested leader in Mr Winter and a history of poor election campaigns.

 

The Liberals have 14 seats in the 35-seat Assembly, Labor 10, the Greens five, independents five and the Jacqui Lambie Network (not running candidates at this election) one.

 

The latest opinion poll, by EMRS in May, showed Labor on 31 per cent, Liberals 29 per cent, independents 17 per cent, the Greens 14 per cent, and JLN 6 per cent.

 

Earlier, Ms Baker met Mr Winter, who told her he was unwilling to govern with the Greens, leaving her little choice but to agree to Mr Rockliff’s election request.

 

Mr Rockliff was earlier accused by some within his party of resisting a request by a cabinet minister to call a meeting of the Parliamentary Liberal Party on Wednesday to discuss the crisis sparked by the no-confidence motion.

 

However, Mr Rockliff on Wednesday night said he had eventually – before visiting the Governor a second time – convened a PLP meeting where he had “once again, received unanimous support to continue to lead the Liberal Party”.

 

Sources said Mr Rockliff’s was earlier dismissive of the idea of a PLP meeting. Two senior ministers – Eric Abetz and Michael Ferguson – were understood to be willing to assume the leadership, but unwilling to challenge him for it.

 

Greens leader Rosalie Woodruff blamed both major parties for the early election, saying Mr Rockliff should have resigned and Mr Winter agreed to govern with Greens support.

 

She flagged a campaign against the stadium and for better public services. “The Greens will be campaigning to stop the stadium, and invest instead in health and housing,” Dr Woodruff said.

 

“We will make sure environmental protection and climate action are front and centre – as we always have. With a new government and the Greens in the balance of power, we can make real change happen.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/beleaguered-shunned-premier-refusing-to-quit-rejected-meeting-call/news-story/9f422c2fd3a4dd402dab76c5ea94c870

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 12, 2025, 3 a.m. No.23163835   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4081 >>4371 >>4548 >>4845 >>5018 >>2225

>>23158072

>>23106961

>>23163733

Albanese-Trump G7 meeting in limbo as Israeli cabinet sanctions trigger US rebuke

 

Jacob Greber - 12 June 2025

 

Anthony Albanese may not meet with Donald Trump next week in Canada as relations with the US administration sour.

 

The countries' relationship is being tested by Australia's decision to sanction two Israeli cabinet members, plus a fresh American review of AUKUS following a disagreement over defence spending.

 

While a potential in-person meeting on the sidelines of the Group of Seven leaders gathering in Alberta is still anticipated, senior sources told the ABC it was too soon to be "definitive" and that there were "lots of moving parts".

 

The prime minister departs for North America on Friday morning for the June 15-17 summit amid expectations he will sit down with Mr Trump to discuss US trade tariffs on Australian steel and other goods, and defence cooperation.

 

But there is also an awareness inside the Australian and US governments that Australia's decision to slap sanctions on two hard-right Israeli ministers — Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich — could trigger the "mercurial" Mr Trump's ire.

 

The sanctions, which were mirrored by the UK, Canada, Norway and New Zealand, triggered an exchange of words on Wednesday between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio — who described them as counterproductive to peace in the region — and Mr Albanese, who dismissed the US charge as "predictable, frankly".

 

While Mr Albanese downplayed potential fallout from the sanctions, saying the matter was not a priority, he insisted the Israeli government "does need to uphold its obligations under international law".

 

The clash with the US over the sanctions came hot on the heels of a disagreement with the Trump administration over defence spending levels, followed this week by revelations the Pentagon would review whether the AUKUS defence pact fit with Mr Trump's "America-first" agenda.

 

Mr Albanese this month rebuffed US Defense Secretary Peter Hegseth's call for Australia to increase "as soon as possible" its military spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from the current level of just over 2 per cent.

 

While there is uncertainty about Mr Trump's willingness to meet with Mr Albanese, there is also a sense the US president is enduring his own disagreements with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Gaza.

 

Labor's decision to impose sanctions on the Israeli cabinet members was criticised by the Greens as "extremely late" while the opposition warned the government had "made a mistake".

 

Liberal senator Andrew Bragg said the use of "Magnitsky-style" sanctions on democratically elected ministers of state was inappropriate.

 

The Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council (AIJAC) slammed the government's "unprecedented" sanctions as a major escalation, while acknowledging the two ministers were controversial.

 

"AIJAC finds many statements by Smotrich and especially Ben-Gvir insupportable and we share the government's concern about settler violence against West Bank Palestinians and call on Israeli authorities to do more to stop them," said the group's executive director, Colin Rubenstein.

 

"However, there are many leaders of the Palestinian Authority, Iran, Turkey, and Qatar who are saying things at least as inflammatory, if not more so.

 

"Yet, there is no discussion of sanctioning any of them."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-12/albanese-trump-g7-meeting-uncertain-israel-sanctions/105405674

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 4:38 p.m. No.23174081   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2225

>>23158072

>>23163733

>>23163835

Labor’s Israeli sanctions ‘put Australia on the US radar’

 

SARAH ISON - June 12, 2025

 

Increasing differences between Washington and Canberra on foreign policies, including the approach to Israel and position on defence spending, have put Australia “on the US radar” and opened up the “opportunity” for the Trump administration to trigger a review of the multibillion-dollar AUKUS deal, former government ministers say.

 

Despite Labor confirming it had known about the Trump administration’s intention to review AUKUS for “some time”, the formal announcement came just a day after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the sanctioning of two Israeli ministers by Australia and Five Eyes partners such as Britain, saying the move did “not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire”.

 

Defence Minister Richard Marles sought to downplay the review, to be led by vocal AUKUS critic and Under Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby, saying it was a “natural step” for US President Donald Trump to take. “I am comfortable about it and I think it’s a pretty natural step for an incoming government to take and we’ll have an opportunity to engage with it,” he told Sky News. “Obviously, I met with my counterpart, Pete Hegseth, just a couple of weeks ago and that was a very positive meeting in relation to the progress of AUKUS and how we see it going.”

 

Former Australian ambassador to Washington Joe Hockey said Anthony Albanese’s push back against Mr Hegseth’s call for Australia to spend 3.5 per cent of its GDP on defence was part of there reason behind the review.

 

“I think he would have seen the opportunity in the disagreement between Secretary Hegseth and Prime Minister Albanese,” he told ABC. “He would have seen that as an opportunity to have a review of AUKUS, probably initiated by himself.”

 

Mr Hockey said there was “still strong support for AUKUS across congress and the White House”.

 

Former Labor minister and co-convener of Labor Friends of Israel Mike Kelly said it was clear the government had been moving out of step with the US and there were now clear consequences.

 

“Certainly, I think we’re now starting to appear on the US radar in terms of our activities,” he said.

 

“The denial of the visit by Hillel Fuld to Australia has been raised in the US. This sanctions activity and what steps we might take at this UN meeting (next week) will also be of great interest to the US.”

 

The Prime Minister on Wednesday labelled the outcry from the US over the sanctioning of ­Israeli ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich as “predictable” and added the matter was “not the priority” in discussions that he had with Mr Trump.

 

Whether Mr Albanese is able to have his first proper face-to-face discussion with Mr Trump on the sidelines of the G7 is yet to be seen, with the US President having not yet confirmed whether a bilateral meeting or informal pull-aside discussion would take place.

 

Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said a meeting between the two leaders needed to take place “as soon as possible” to provide clarity and certainty on the future of AUKUS.

 

“When will the Prime Minister meet with … President Trump, to discuss this face to face? We understood there was a meeting that was going to proceed. That is less clear now,” he said. “It is hugely important the Prime Minister meet with the President to discuss this.”

 

While Labor’s sanctions of Israeli ministers and response to calls to increase defence spending were pointed to as having likely inflamed tensions with Mr Trump, analysts said an increasing divide between the US and Australia had been months in the making.

 

Strategic Analysis Australia founder Michael Shoebridge said Labor had benefited politically from distancing itself from Mr Trump and the US during the campaign, while seeking to accuse Peter Dutton of “copying” policies from the US, but was potentially now seeing the consequences of that language.

 

He said the diverging positions between the US and Australia came as Washington was grappling with significantly curbing its own submarine capability in order to lock in supply to Australia.

 

“Their core question is, is weakening America to strengthen Australia worth doing?” he said.

 

“If there’s a war over Taiwan, will Australian submarines be there? And our government’s made the obvious point, we’ll make our own decision at the time.

 

“We can’t give and we wouldn’t give future commitments.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/labors-israeli-sanctions-put-australia-on-the-us-radar/news-story/95e7ab7bd7ebc0f5ca5057d3930c1b00

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 5:34 p.m. No.23174371   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4382 >>2256

>>23163733

>>23163835

Anthony Albanese’s mission: save the AUKUS pact

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - June 12, 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese is preparing a series of major defence funding announcements and will ensure Australia delivers on its pledge to service US nuclear submarines from 2027, as his government scrambles to lock in support from Donald Trump on the $368bn AUKUS pact.

 

The Prime Minister on Friday will fly from Canberra on a critical one-week overseas trip that will bring him face to face with the President for the first time, amid concerns from the US that AUKUS will force it to deliver major funding and defence capabilities to a country that has not committed to support Washington in a conflict over Taiwan.

 

Ahead of Mr Albanese travelling to Fiji, the US and Canada, the Pentagon on Thursday announced a snap 30-day review of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, led by influential Defence Under Secretary for Policy, Elbridge Colby, who has expressed concerns about Australian defence spending and American industrial shipbuilding capacity.

 

As G7 leaders prepare to gather in the Canadian town of Kananaskis over the weekend amid rising tensions between the US and Iran, The Australian understands Mr Trump is yet to lock in any bilateral meetings with counterparts including Mr Albanese.

 

While the Prime Minister faces a backlash over so far resisting a concerted push from Washington to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, US government ­officials said they believed the meeting with Mr Trump was likely to proceed.

 

They told The Australian that, on top of the view Canberra should lift investment in defence, there was concern over giving submarines to a country that had not expressed willingness to join any conflict over Taiwan.

 

AUKUS had also always been considered “Australia’s idea”, with the need to justify the project resting firmly with Canberra, the sources said.

 

Defence Minister Richard Marles said he had known about the US AUKUS review “for some time” and welcomed it. Both the British and Australian governments had also conducted reviews into the defence pact. Mr Marles singled out Australia’s financial contributions to the American shipbuilding industrial base and said “AUKUS is under way right now … activities are happening under the banner of AUKUS”.

 

“We’re really confident about the progress of AUKUS and we’re confident about how it will proceed under the Trump Administration,” he said.

 

Former prime minister Scott Morrison, who hatched the AUKUS deal with Joe Biden and Boris Johnson in 2021, said the focus of the review was not new and “rightly centres on US submarine production rates”.

 

“This is a known and genuine challenge for the US industrial base,” Mr Morrison told Sky News. “This goes directly to the maintenance and expansion of the US submarine fleet, and it’s an area where Australia is already uniquely contributing under AUKUS Pillar I.

 

“I’ve known Elbridge for some years and he’s made observations in the past. He’s a pretty straight shooter in my experience. This is really about what can the US produce and how can they lift their own production capability and so they can meet their obligations that have been set out under AUKUS.”

 

Australian National University professor of international security and intelligence studies John Blaxland said Mr Colby had a “US-first, zero-sum approach to the submarine allocation”.

 

“For him, the question is – we can’t be 100 per cent sure that, in a conflict, Australia would be on our side – which is true,” Professor Blaxland told The Australian.

 

But he said “any self-respecting democracy” could not commit in advance to something that was outside the scope of its treaty obligations – in this case, the ANZUS alliance. “Taiwan is not in the treaty,” he said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 5:36 p.m. No.23174382   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23174371

 

2/2

 

Mr Albanese, who will meet ­Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni ­Rabuka on Friday, is expected to hold formal talks on the sidelines of the G7 summit with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, ­Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and new South Korean President Lee Jae-myung.

 

Mr Albanese will visit the US west-coast city of Seattle on the weekend to meet business leaders and talk up the Australia-US trade relationship amid concerns over Mr Trump’s tariffs. Government sources said he would likely travel to Washington DC later this year for a meeting with the President at the White House.

 

The Australian understands the Albanese government was first made aware of the AUKUS review ahead of the May 30 meeting between Mr Marles and US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. Mr Hegseth, who discussed AUKUS with Mr Marles during the meeting, both privately and publicly urged his counterpart to lift Australia’s defence spending to 3.5 per cent “as soon as possible”.

 

He also issued a stark warning over the “imminent threat” posed by China to Taiwan.

 

As the US, Japan, Britain and other Indo-Pacific allies significantly lift defence budgets amid Chinese military expansion and aggression in the region, the ­Albanese government’s defence spend is currently projected to hit 2.33 per cent by 2033-34.

 

The AUKUS review, which Australian officials believe is not directly linked to defence spending, has been ordered by Mr Hegseth to ensure “this initiative of the previous (Biden) administration … is aligned with the President’s America First agenda”.

 

The Australian understands the Albanese government – under pressure from former defence ministers, Labor leaders including Kim Beazley, the Coalition and ­security analysts to lift the defence budget to at least 3 per cent of GDP – will increase defence spending over the coming months.

 

In addition to ensuring Fleet Base West in Western Australia is ready to receive US nuclear submarines from 2027, which was agreed to in the AUKUS deal, the government is expected to unveil extra funding for projects including the Henderson consolidation project (where AUKUS submarines will be built and maintained) and the SEA3000 program adding 11 frigates to the fleet.

 

After Mr Hegseth this month warned about the rise of China and the risk of Beijing invading Taiwan by 2027, senior officials believe Australia will be ready by that year to begin Submarine Rotational-Force West, which is the first phase in the AUKUS Pillar 1 ­program. Under the AUKUS agreement, one British Astute class submarine and up to four US Virginia class submarines will have a rotational presence at the HMAS Stirling base.

 

Given the pressures on the US navy fleet, Australian maintenance and support operations could help the Americans keep at least up to two extra boats on the water and not stuck in queues.

 

While senior Australian officials don’t believe Mr Trump will tear up the AUKUS pact – a 30-day review has given them more optimism than a longer investigation would have – they are on alert and watching carefully given the unpredictable nature of the Trump administration. Some US and Australian defence experts said there was a chance that the Colby review could result in changes to the AUKUS agreement “at the periphery”.

 

Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, who was at Parliament House in Canberra on Thursday, is understood to be in close communication with Mr Albanese over the review.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/anthony-albaneses-mission-save-the-aukus-pact/news-story/b0d16917d7aa3fdad37ad5625b9bb4d2

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 6:01 p.m. No.23174548   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4556 >>2258

>>23163733

>>23163835

Give Trump ‘a new Pine Gap’, say experts claiming AUKUS go-slow

 

Paul Sakkal - June 12, 2025

 

1/2

 

Slow progress on new submarine bases is fuelling calls to offer the US “another Pine Gap” in Western Australia, as defence and diplomatic heavyweights claim a lack of urgency on AUKUS is giving Americans reasons to doubt Australia’s seriousness about the pact.

 

Defence analyst Michael Shoebridge and Yaron Finkelstein, who was chief adviser to former prime minister Scott Morrison when he signed up to the AUKUS pact, said the US had doubts about how much Australia valued the program.

 

Shoebridge said AUKUS was a “gift to the Albanese government that let them wave this totem around” to demonstrate national security credentials at a time when Australia was spending “almost nothing” in the next 10 years and deferring big-spending decisions.

 

Finkelstein, Morrison’s former principal private secretary, said the Biden administration also had concerns about what it perceived as Australian delays in pushing ahead with AUKUS.

 

“There’s a bit of a legacy, a perception, about [whether] our heart is in it,” he said on Sky News. “They had a view that maybe we don’t want this as much as when we first started.”

 

One solution Shoebridge and former Home Affairs chief Mike Pezzullo endorse is a joint submarine base in Australia.

 

The prospect of a US submarine base in Australia is highly contentious, with union and Labor left figures arguing nuclear submarines are dangerous.

 

South Coast Labour Council Secretary, Arthur Rorris, said on Thursday that AUKUS was “the most costly, dangerous and treacherous decision ever made by an Australian government in this space”.

 

AUKUS was announced in 2021, but the government has not picked a nuclear waste site or an east coast submarine base, and there are concerns about the speed of planning for a shipyard in Henderson, Western Australia.

 

Australia made the first of six $US500 million ($770 million) payments to boost the capacity of the US submarine industry earlier this year as part of the $368 billion deal, and has hosted visiting American vessels.

 

The US informed Australia about a 30-day review of the pact weeks ago, which became public on Thursday. Defence Minister Richard Marles said he welcomed the review. “It’s something which is perfectly natural for an incoming administration to do,” he said on the ABC.

 

Senior Australian government sources, not permitted to speak publicly, said the US stood to gain from AUKUS and believed the review might be designed to gain leverage as Washington pushed Australia to spend more on defence.

 

Former US ambassador Joe Hockey said bases should be expanded into locations at which the US could perform large volumes of submarine maintenance to help the US overturn a backlog crippling its ability to keep subs in operation.

 

“It would be enormously important to the Americans and allow for a significant increase in their capability and deterrence value in the region,” Hockey told this masthead. “Australia is lagging behind.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 6:02 p.m. No.23174556   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23174548

 

2/2

 

The man central to the US’ AUKUS review, defence official Elbridge Colby, has previously expressed reservations about handing over nuclear submarines in the early 2030s at the same time as a potential confrontation between China and Taiwan may demand all the US’ firepower.

 

Colby has this year made more positive remarks about AUKUS’ first pillar. The review was instituted by Colby, not the White House.

 

But Colby’s focus on war-readiness in the case of a conflict with China – which is far from guaranteed, and may not draw in Australia – has spurred calls to make the AUKUS deal more useful for its short-term focus on China.

 

Pezzullo, who helmed the 2009 defence white paper, said the Henderson base should be transformed into a joint facility.

 

“Better still, Australia could establish this shipyard, by treaty, as a joint Australian-US facility, in recognition of its vital role in the alliance, which could be at least as significant as the contribution of the Pine Gap satellite ground station,” he wrote in an article for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute think tank last month. In 2023, the Albanese government dismissed Pezzullo for exerting undue political influence under the previous Coalition government.

 

“Being able to operate routinely in the Indian Ocean without having to transit the congested littoral waters of South-East Asia and in the western Pacific in times of tension and conflict is of immense strategic value to the US,” Pezzullo wrote.

 

Such a move would likely be contentious and trigger concerns, particularly on the left, about Australian sovereignty and hewing more closely to the US at a time when Western allies and citizens are growing more doubtful about US President Donald Trump’s reliability.

 

But Shoebridge said Australia was already deeply enmeshed in US military architecture via Pine Gap, a critical intelligence facility near Alice Springs, and the presence of US Marines in Darwin, approved by former prime minister Julia Gillard.

 

“I think it would be getting to a level with Pine Gap,” Shoebridge said, backing the idea of a bigger plan for Henderson and criticising Labor for the speed of decision-making and funding on AUKUS milestones.

 

“If we’re not doing those long lead-time items, how can we still tell the Americans we are serious about AUKUS?”

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/give-trump-a-new-pine-gap-say-experts-claiming-aukus-go-slow-20250612-p5m6tj.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 6:12 p.m. No.23174595   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2258

>>22977683

>>23163733

>>23163785

Malcolm Turnbull wants Australia to invest in alternative defence capabilities as US reviews AUKUS agreement

 

Paul Johnson - 12 Jun 2025

 

Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull says the Australian government is misinformed when it comes to the AUKUS deal and the United States' ability to provide nuclear submarines.

 

Mr Turnbull, a longtime critic of the defence pact, claimed Defence Minister Richard Marles made an incorrect statement on 7.30, on the same day the US announced a review of the deal.

 

Mr Marles said he was confident the US could increase its production capacity to two boats per year to honour the deal.

 

"We need to get to that point in the early 2030s. That's the time frame," Mr Marles told 7.30.

 

"Right now, we are confident that we can meet that. And we are seeing real progress."

 

Mr Turnbull said Australia's defence minister was "misinformed".

 

"Richard Marles said that the rate of production of Virginia-class submarines is increasing. That's not true," Mr Turnbull said.

 

"The latest numbers given to the Congress by the navy on 11 March this year was that the rate of production is 1.1 per annum.

 

"They need to get to two by 2028 to be able to meet their own requirements, and to 2.33 to meet their own, plus Australia's.

 

"And they have not been able to lift production rates despite the expenditure of over $10 billion over the last six or seven years. So, they've got a real problem."

 

Mr Turnbull said it was unlikely that Elbridge Colby, who is leading the Pentagon's review, would say the US could spare the submarines even if they could increase their production capacity.

 

"They're short of submarines today," Mr Turnbull said.

 

"They're producing about half as many as they need to produce for their own needs. The competitive threat from China is increasing. And there is a risk of war imminently, according to [US Defence Secretary Pete] Hegseth, over Taiwan.

 

"I think that they'll conclude in the review that that question is either answered in the negative — they can't spare them — or they certainly won't be saying they can."

 

While Mr Marles has repeatedly called for calm and said the US strategic review was what any new administration would do, Mr Turnbull said the matter would only end in one nation's favour while President Donald Trump pursued an "America first" position.

 

"I'm sure they'd like to continue receiving the $3 billion, of which Richard's given them the first deposit," Mr Turnbull said.

 

"As to whether we get any submarines, that will be judged purely and solely in accordance with their legislation in America's interest. And it is America First. That's the Zeitgeist."

 

Morrison's 'great achievement'

 

There is speculation the US will use the review to squeeze Australia on defence spending.

 

Mr Marles told 7.30 that discussions and dialogue with the US remained open and he continued to push back on the suggestion Australia needed a 'plan B'.

 

"There is a plan here. We are sticking to it and we're going to deliver," he said. "Chopping and changing guarantees you will never have the capability."

 

But according to Mr Turnbull, Australia does need a plan B, with the current crop of Collins-class submarines nearing the end of their service life.

 

"It may be that it is too late. It may be that we end up with no submarines," he said, before firing a broadside at former prime minister Scott Morrison, who signed the AUKUS deal after scrapping a Turnbull government agreement for French submarines.

 

"That may be Scott's great achievement," he said.

 

"Let's assume that's the worst case.

 

"In that case, what we should be doing … and this is certainly what's being canvassed by the Americans — we should be investing in alternatives.

 

"We could do the base, do the maintenance, leave the submarining to the Americans, and invest in other military capabilities that give us the ability to defend ourselves over a long range — long-range missiles, long-range bombers. Those capabilities."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-12/turnbull-questions-marles-over-under-review-aukus-deal/105410774

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMk_d5kyjyE

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 6:16 p.m. No.23174623   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2258

>>23032055

>>23163733

>>23163758

Paul Keating is right, US AUKUS review might very well ‘save Australia from itself’

 

Global Times - Jun 12, 2025

 

The Financial Times cited six sources on Wednesday reporting that US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby is leading a review of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal with the UK and Australia to determine whether the US should scrap the project. The report noted that this move has triggered anxiety in Canberra.

 

Some Australian media outlets were quick to respond with headlines like "not to worry" and "not a harbinger of collapse." The eagerness to defend the project instead made the anxiety quite obvious. However, other voices emerging from Australia have proven more compelling and harder to ignore.

 

Australian former prime minister Paul Keating issued a statement on Thursday, saying that "the review makes clear that America keeps its national interests uppermost. But the concomitant question is: why has Australia failed to do the same?" Another former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull said Australia should "wake up" and review the agreement itself. "The UK is conducting a review of AUKUS. The US department of defence is conducting a review of AUKUS. But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review," he wrote on X on Thursday.

 

Such perspectives were echoed by some Australian netizens, one stated, "Let's hope the US DOES walk away from it," while another noted, "It would have been better if Australia terminate AUKUS as it demonstrates our sovereignty."

 

Perhaps some organizations and individuals may express disappointment or even shock over the US review, but clear-headed Australians have likely breathed a quiet sigh of relief. For those anxious about the US review, this may also be an opportunity to confront the reality that Australia has always been the party paying the highest price with little gain in this deal.

 

If the US abandons AUKUS, Australia's chances of obtaining submarines will remain unchanged - they were very unlikely to receive any anyway. In recent years, Australian observers have made it clear: Australia won't own AUKUS submarines but will instead host a US naval base with American-controlled submarines. This hollowing of Australia's autonomy is turning the country into a forward operating garrison for US global operations and future conflicts - offering no real security, only greater risk.

 

If the US does not walk away from AUKUS, the situation won't be any better. The core reason behind this review is that the US can no longer conceal a harsh reality: It's questionable whether its industrial capacity can produce enough submarines to sustain the project. Colby cautioned last year that submarines are a scare, critical commodity and the US industry couldn't produce enough to meet domestic demand. A Pentagon spokesperson also said the department was reviewing AUKUS to ensure that this initiative is aligned with "America First" agenda.

 

Some observers suggest following this review, the US is likely to demand more from Australia in the AUKUS project. Warwick Powell, an Australian scholar, told the Global Times, "Australian subimperial fealty is being tested. In an America First frame, the US is likely to demand more from Australia without providing any further guarantees."

 

He further stated that it's conceivable the US will first increase demands on financial contributions from Australia, and second, at best offer access to submarines captained by the US navy and based out of Australian ports. For critics of AUKUS, this would confirm Australia's abandonment of any pretense of national security autonomy and sovereignty.

 

Chen Hong, a professor and director of the Australian Studies Centre at East China Normal University, told the Global Times that Australia, as an island nation surrounded by ocean, enjoys a natural layer of security. In this context, advancing the AUKUS project amounts to planting the seeds of future military conflict - bringing risks not only to Australia itself but also to regional peace and stability. Moreover, given the current state of Australia's economy, it is hardly in a position to shoulder the enormous costs required to sustain such a project.

 

China certainly is not a fan of AUKUS, as it undermines peace and stability in the region. However, China is far from alone; many countries across the region have also voiced concerns or outright opposition to the pact.

 

After the Pentagon launched a review of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, Western media rushed to quote American politicians speculating that it would "be met with cheers in Beijing." Ultimately, some American politicians appear overly fixated on how China might react with a zero-sum mentality - while overlooking a more urgent question: How much credibility does the US still have as an ally and partner?

 

https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202506/1336026.shtml

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 7:04 p.m. No.23174845   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4859 >>2420 >>2504 >>6849 >>3273 >>2155

>>23158072

>>23163733

>>23163835

PM’s meeting with Trump in doubt as Middle East conflict escalates

 

Paul Sakkal - June 13, 2025

 

1/2

 

Canberra/Nadi: Anthony Albanese’s first face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump risks being derailed as Israeli strikes on Iran seize global attention ahead of a G7 summit in Canada.

 

Albanese told Australians to avoid the region and pointed to new government advice not to travel to Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories as Iran prepared retaliatory strikes.

 

Speaking in Fiji on Friday before heading to the United States and Canada, the prime minister warned of Iran’s nuclear program, but called for a diplomatic solution.

 

“We, of course, are very conscious of the threat that Iran becoming a nuclear state would represent to peace and security in the region,” Albanese said on Friday.

 

“We want to see these issues resolved through dialogue, and the United States has been playing an important role there.”

 

Despite weeks of commentary about possible talks with Trump on tariffs and defence, a Trump-Albanese meeting had not been formally secured when the prime minister departed on Friday.

 

Trump has not yet confirmed meetings with any world leaders at the G7, which begins on June 15, but Australia was confident it would secure an informal conversation on the sidelines or a bilateral meeting in Canada.

 

Two Australian government sources familiar with planning for the trip said Australia had for several days contemplated if an Israel-Iran war, which had been foreshadowed for some time, might force Trump to skip the G7 meeting entirely. Trump is also managing a heated domestic row, which he has been widely accused of stoking, over protests in Los Angeles.

 

If the president does attend, according to the sources who asked for anonymity to discuss the thinking inside the government, his focus may be a long way from the Australia-US relationship.

 

The AUKUS submarine pact is in the spotlight ahead of the potential talks after the US Defence Department announced a snap 30-day review of the program. Labor ministers reacted calmly to the news and some privately believe it is a tool to leverage Australia to spend more on defence.

 

Albanese talked down the significance of the fresh US assessment of the landmark defence pact, echoing AUKUS architect and former prime minister Scott Morrison’s remarks on Thursday.

 

“The United States says an incoming government is having a review, just like the Australian government did … and just like the government of Keir Starmer in the United Kingdom,” the prime minister said.

 

“We are very confident, though, that AUKUS is in the interest of all three of our nations and that it will play an important role in peace, security and stability around the world.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 7:06 p.m. No.23174859   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23174845

 

2/2

 

On Saturday morning, Albanese will depart for a two-day business-focused visit to Seattle, in the US, before flying on to Kananaskis in the Canadian province of Alberta for the G7 summit.

 

Health Minister Mark Butler said Albanese would have lots to talk about with Trump “if there’s the opportunity with the US president”.

 

Coalition senator Dave Sharma, also speaking on the ABC, said the Middle East conflagration would “take over anything else” that was on the agenda at the G7.

 

“It’s not yet clear whether President Donald Trump will actually attend that meeting,” the former diplomat said.

 

“It doesn’t mean the prime minister shouldn’t seek to have a bilateral [meeting] with the president and seek to put our views on AUKUS and other important issues, but clearly we’ll also be asked, and the prime minister will be asked, about our views and concerns around this latest development.”

 

Israel’s attack on Iran – in which 200 jets hit more than 100 sites and killed three of Iran’s security chiefs – sparked global fears of damaging counterattacks and an oil and energy price spike, prompting Foreign Minister Penny Wong to express alarm.

 

“This risks further destabilising an already volatile region. We call on all parties to refrain from actions and rhetoric that would further exacerbate tensions,” she said earlier on Friday, in the same week she announced sanctions on hardline Israeli ministers.

 

Colin Rubenstein, of the Australia-Israel Jewish Affairs Council, said diplomacy had failed in curbing Iran, a nation with a stated aim of destroying Israel with the help of its proxies in Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen.

 

Israel’s ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, described the attacks as self-preservation, citing Israeli intelligence that Iran possessed enough enriched uranium to build nine nuclear bombs.

 

“Recent reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency confirm that Iran is in serious breach of its … commitments,” he said.

 

But Greens foreign affairs spokesman David Shoebridge said Israel’s latest attack was a “dangerous escalation” that risked global war.

 

“Australia must clearly state we won’t participate and will prohibit use of Pine Gap and other joint US facilities in these attacks,” he said.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/pm-s-meeting-with-trump-in-doubt-as-middle-east-conflict-escalates-20250613-p5m77n.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 7:40 p.m. No.23175018   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>5030 >>2225

>>23032055

>>23163733

>>23163835

COMMENTARY: Anthony Albanese’s ‘doublespeak’ no substitute for straight talk on defence

 

CHRIS UHLMANN - 14 June 2025

 

1/2

 

The subtext of Anthony Albanese’s speech to the National Press Club could not have been louder if he had screamed it from the podium: the biggest threat to Australia is the contagion of American ideas. It was summed up in this sentence: “Australians voted against importing conflicts and ideologies that have no basis in our national culture or character.”

 

Importing what conflicts and ideologies? From where? The religious hatred Iran and its proxies mobilise across the Middle East and export here? The tyrannical ideologies that China and Russia want to normalise and impose on this nation and the world?

 

No. This statement was aimed squarely at the ideas the Prime Minister says Australians rejected at the election, the ones the Coalition stands accused of smuggling in from the US: culture wars and small government.

 

“Australians voted against mass sackings in the public service and the damage that would do to our social safety net,” Albanese said. Here you are invited to conjure a crazy billionaire running amok with a chainsaw in Centrelink. This is apparently what the Coalition intended with its modest, botched, proposal that the number of federal public servants should be reduced through natural attrition and that the rest should be required to work from work.

 

Labor successfully poisoned this well by broadening the threat from federal employees to the entire workforce.

 

“Australians overwhelmingly rejected policies designed to drive down wages, undermine job security and take flexibility away from working families,” Albanese said.

 

Typically, the Coalition reacted like a kangaroo caught in the headlights of a road train. In the end, the only trace of the policy was a bloody smear on the tarmac and flyblown meat on the bull bar. The result? Everyone in politics now apparently agrees the federal public service carries no fat and the highest-paid bureaucrats on earth should never be pressed to ply their trade from the vast, expensive, purpose-built empty offices that litter Canberra.

 

Seriously, if the Liberal Party cannot campaign for smaller government at future elections, then maybe it is time to fold the tent.

 

But I digress.

 

Albanese’s theme was clear: Labor saved Australia from becoming a colonial outpost of Trumpian America. Albanese knows there are rich political fields to be ploughed here and all available evidence supports him.

 

An extract from the latest Lowy Institute Poll records Australians’ trust in the US fell by 20 points in a year, “with only 36 per cent of the public expressing any level of trust, a new low in two decades of Lowy Institute polling. Almost two-thirds of the public (64 per cent) say they hold ‘not very much’ trust (32 per cent) or no trust ‘at all’ (32 per cent) in the United States to act responsibly.”

 

This is an astounding vote of no confidence in our major ally, and the fault lies entirely with Donald Trump. But what is intriguing are the signals that Labor sees enduring opportunity in highlighting differences with the US for domestic political profit.

 

When challenged by the US Defence Secretary to lift defence spending, Albanese channelled his inner John Howard: “We’ll determine our defence policy.” When Australia joined four other nations in sanctioning two Israeli ministers for “inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank”, the Prime Minister described the furious response from Washington and Israel as “predictable, frankly”. In announcing the sanctions Foreign Minister Penny Wong made the perfectly reasonable observation that Australia and the US did not always walk in lock-step.

 

“The alliance is an alliance that is strong and that has stood the test of time through administrations and prime ministers, governments of different political persuasions,” she said. “From time to time we have differences of views.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 13, 2025, 7:41 p.m. No.23175030   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23175018

 

2/2

 

There are good reasons Canberra should differ with Washington, but with a president as mercurial and transactional as Trump this is a highwire act.

 

There is also a hazard in dog-whistling disdain for the US President while downplaying the real and present danger posed by China’s Xi Jinping.

 

Observers in Washington might have noted the tone Albanese adopted when asked whether he thought China was a national security threat. “I think that our engagement with the region and the world needs to be diplomatic, needs to be mature and needs to avoid the, you know, attempts to simplify what are a complex set of relationships,” Albanese said.

 

Here the Prime Minister was at pains to de-escalate language, refusing to endorse the word “threat” when discussing Beijing. He turns strategic competition into constructive engagement, the opposite of the tone he applies to American populist ideological contagion. This jars with the 2023 Defence Strategic Review his government commissioned and endorsed. It clearly defines China as a threat and it is driving the government’s claimed step-up in military spending.

 

Six days before the prime ministerial address, Australia’s Chief of the Defence Force, Admiral David Johnston, hammered the point home. “Perhaps finally we are having to reconsider Australia as a homeland from which we will conduct combat operations,” Johnston said.

 

It’s a fair bet the defence chief was not talking about manning the domestic barricades against the US. In every conversation about defence the subtext always screams China. So the distance between this statement and the Prime Minister’s happy talk is the gap between a loaded gun and a diplomatic cable. And, in passing, if we are to be consistent about sanctioning governments for mistreating Muslims, when will Canberra target Chinese ministers for the state-sponsored terror campaign against the Uighurs? The parliaments of Canada and Britain call it genocide. The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights calls it a possible crime against humanity.

 

Canberra chides Washington, soothes Beijing and hopes America will cover the yawning gap between our rhetoric and our defences. This Janus-faced divide could become awkward as Albanese tries to arrange his first meeting with Trump. It will be an interesting week.

 

Right now Australia cannot defend itself without American support. The Lowy poll shows the public still appreciates that. So does Albanese, which is why he and his ministers stress the enduring value of the alliance. But alliances come with costs as well as benefits, so it is time we faced some tough choices. Canberra words and deeds need to be brought back into alignment. If the Albanese government truly believes China is not a threat and finds the American alliance politically uncomfortable, it can abandon costly nuclear-powered submarines, spend the money on welfare and distance itself from Washington.

 

If it thinks China is a threat and America is a worry, it should be preparing for the worst and pumping money into defence based on Australia’s needs, not Trump’s demands. That has to begin with the Prime Minister levelling with the Australian people and echoing the urgency of the language of his defence force chief. This means annoying Beijing.

 

At present Labor is doing neither. It talks up defence as capability shrinks while gambling that America will rescue us. That is no longer a safe bet.

 

Right now we are speaking softly out both sides of our mouth and carrying a very small stick. We may soon discover that doublespeak is no substitute for straight talk and hard power.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/anthony-albaneses-doublespeak-no-substitute-for-straight-talk-on-defence/news-story/795732e255cb9f84c39e4814e2a0391a

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 15, 2025, 2:15 a.m. No.23182420   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6849 >>3273 >>3311 >>2698 >>2155

>>23158072

>>23174845

Israel’s top diplomat clips Penny Wong for phoning Iranians

 

Paul Sakkal - June 15, 2025

 

Israel’s ambassador to Australia has delivered a veiled barb to Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Western leaders pushing for diplomacy after she revealed she had phoned her Iranian counterpart urging restraint after Israel’s strikes on Iran.

 

Wong has backed Israel’s right to defend itself against Iran’s nuclear program, the expansion of which earned a censure from the international nuclear watchdog before Israel launched an attack on Iran on Friday. Wong has also been dealing with Israeli officials since the conflict broke out. Many other Western leaders have made similar remarks urging diplomatic talks rather than more violence.

 

But she has declined to explicitly endorse Israel’s military action, instead emphasising the need for diplomacy as tit-for-tat barrages continued.

 

“This is precisely the same message I put to [Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi]: that we urge restraint because whatever people’s views about what has occurred to date, what happens tomorrow matters to all peoples in the region,” Wong said on ABC’s Insiders on Sunday.

 

“I directly put to the Iranian foreign minister, ‘We are saying to you, exercise restraint, return to diplomacy and dialogue because continuing to escalate this has consequences’.”

 

Iran has been increasingly co-operating with a group of authoritarian nations threatening Western hegemony, including China, Russia and North Korea. The theocratic state funds proxy outfits Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen to help bring about its stated aim of damaging Israel.

 

Despite this, Australia maintains diplomatic ties with Iran, unlike the United States, so that Australian officials can deliver messages from allies, including warnings. The Albanese government – as it faced criticism from pro-Israel groups for not siding strongly enough with Israel over the Gaza war – was pressured by the Coalition to expel the Iranian ambassador last year over his violent statements about Israel. Many European nations also have diplomatic relations with Iran.

 

Israeli ambassador Amir Maimon, a critic of Australia’s policies on the Middle East, latched onto Wong’s remarks about her call with Tehran, releasing his own statement about an hour after she spoke. The statement did not mention Wong by name but made reference to her calls for diplomacy and suggested such sentiments were unrealistic.

 

“Iran isn’t hiding its intent, it declares it. And it’s building the weapons to fulfil it,” Maimon said.

 

“Through its pursuit of nuclear arms, Iran has turned this into an asymmetric conflict, between a democracy seeking to defend itself and a regime bent on destruction.”

 

“Yet some still urge diplomacy, as if words can stop warheads.”

 

Wong has also been engaging with the Israeli embassy in Canberra. She had a call with the Israeli foreign minister scheduled for Friday, but it was postponed; both sides are working to reschedule.

 

The Iranian foreign ministry released a statement about its call with Wong on social media. The readout appeared to give the impression that Wong was critical of Israel’s actions, but it omitted her public statements about Iran’s nuclear program, the threat it posed to world peace, and Israel’s right to defend itself.

 

“The Australian foreign minister voiced deep regret and serious concern over the escalation of tensions in the region,” the Iranian statement said.

 

“Wong stressed that such developments risk further regional destabilisation. She also urged all sides to refrain from actions that risk escalating tensions.”

 

In the same ABC interview, Wong emphasised Israel’s entitlement to keep itself safe from the threat of Iran but declined to explicitly endorse the Netanyahu government’s military action.

 

“Well, Israel has a right to self-defence. It does have a right to self-defence,” she said.

 

“But the question here is not a legal proposition, the question here is what do we do now? We know Iran is a threat. We know that its nuclear program poses a threat to international peace and obviously to Israel.

 

“And how do we respond in a way that lessens the risk of more civilians … being brought into this conflict?”

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese advised Australians to follow government advice to avoid travel to Israel or occupied territories.

 

“Australia does not play a role in this military conflict. I wouldn’t expect that there would be a request for Australia to play a military role, but we will continue to play a role in terms of looking after Australian citizens,” he said from Seattle on the way to a G7 summit in Canada.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/israel-s-top-diplomat-clips-penny-wong-for-phoning-iranians-20250615-p5m7ir.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 15, 2025, 2:26 a.m. No.23182429   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2226

>>23163825

Nationals oppose Liberals’ Hobart AFL stadium to win Tasmania seats, open to ex-JLN MPs

 

MATTHEW DENHOLM - June 12, 2025

 

The Nationals – seeking to “take Tasmania by storm” at the state election – have joined the Greens in vowing to kill Hobart’s “irresponsible” Macquarie Point AFL stadium.

 

Seeking to re-establish the party in the decentralised island state, after six years without an elected representative, the Nationals on Thursday announced they would stand candidates in three of the five multi-member electorates.

 

The Nationals’ vow to ditch the $1bn stadium – championed by the minority Liberal government – gives anti-stadium voters in those seats an alternative to the Greens, with Labor and the Liberals standing by the project.

 

Nationals Senate leader Brid­get McKenzie, in Tasmania to kickstart her party’s campaign, ­denied the stadium stance was disloyal to her national Coalition partner.

 

“We are not a faction of the Australian Liberal Party,” Senator McKenzie told The Australian.

 

She said voters in Bass, Braddon and Lyons who did not want the stadium but did not want to vote for the Greens or independents now had another, less de­stabilising option.

 

“We are not a party of protest like the Greens, like other minor parties … we are a party of government and have a very responsible approach to the work of representation, to fiscal respon­sibility,” she said.

 

“When it comes to the stadia, the policy developed by the Tasmanian Nationals is because they care about the state of the state budget and the (debt-related) intergeneration issues.

 

“You’ve got a $1bn project proposal which the state of the state budget would indicate would be an irresponsible decision at this time. The Tasmanian Nationals 100 per cent support an AFL team but they do not support a Macquarie Point stadium. That is a clear point of ­difference.”

 

The party has called for candidate nominations and is not ruling out embracing former Jacqui Lambie Network sitting MPs Andrew Jenner, Rebekah Pentland and Miriam Beswick.

 

“The National Party in Tasmania welcomes everyone to join and nominations are open,” Senator McKenzie said, adding the ex-JLN MPs would have to follow the party’s normal process: “Be part of this political movement that we hope is going to take Tasmania by storm.”

 

Her party had a history in Tasmania dating back to 1920 when William McWilliams became the first leader of the Federal Country Party. Its last Tasmanian elected representative was former senator Steve Martin, who lost his seat in 2019.

 

“This is a state we’ve always felt is a natural fit for the National Party – key industries like ag, fishing, forestry and mining are our bread and butter,” Senator McKenzie said.

 

The Greens, hoping to build on their five seats in the 35-seat Assembly, are also focusing their campaign on the stadium, a condition of the Tasmania Devils’ entry to the AFL. “This election is an opportunity to put a stop to it once and for all,” said Greens leader, Rosalie Woodruff.

 

With Labor and Liberal both backing the stadium and a recent opinion poll showing 57 per cent of Tasmanians oppose its fast-track through parliament, the issue could send voters into the arms of independents and minor parties.

 

Peter George, an anti-salmon candidate who gave Labor a scare in the seat of Franklin in the federal election and is standing for the mirror state seat, added his voice in opposition to the stadium.

 

Tasmania, going to the polls on July 19 for the second time in 16 months because of a no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff, has five electorates each returning seven MPs.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/nationals-oppose-liberals-hobart-afl-stadium-to-win-tasmania-seats-open-to-exjln-mps/news-story/a57fa8f346caeda94e21006008f46171

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 15, 2025, 2:37 a.m. No.23182448   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2259

>>23163733

‘Pillar 1 problematic, Pillar 2 great’: Inside Colby’s AUKUS mind

 

MATTHEW CRANSTON - June 12, 2025

 

If US Under-Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby’s personal views on AUKUS come to fruition, then Australia’s largest ever military project won’t be happening in its current form.

 

A review is now being conducted by the Pentagon so it’s wait and see, but in a long interview conducted with Mr Colby just before he was hand-picked by Donald Trump for the Pentagon, he conveyed his view on the two pillars of AUKUS, approved by Congress, and subject to Presidential authority.

 

“Pillar I is very problematic, Pillar II is great, no problem,” Colby said.

 

Pillar I involves the US selling nuclear-powered submarines to Australia in the early 2030s.

 

Pillar II is about other military intelligence sharing including the development of artificial intelligence.

 

Colby scuttled several positive takes I posed about the sale of nuclear submarines to Australia.

 

“How are we supposed to give away nuclear attack submarines in the years of the window of potential conflict with China?” he asked me back.

 

“A nuclear attack submarine is the most important asset for a western Pacific fight, for Taiwan, conventionally. But we don’t have enough, and we’re not going to have enough,” Colby said.

 

America is nowhere near producing enough of its own submarines. so why would they sell any to Australia?

 

In just four years following the attack on Pearl Harbour, the United States built 273, albeit significantly less sophisticated, diesel-powered subs. Today, it’s barely producing two nuclear submarines per year.

 

“We are in what’s called a submarine bathtub. We have way too few attack submarines for what we need as a nation,” Colby said.

 

What about the fact that having a few submarines under the command of an ally like Australia, which can create a strategic ambiguity for China’s People’s Liberation Navy is a positive?

 

“A green asset is an ally. But there’s nothing like a blue asset. Blue means it’s ours,” Colby said, “As long as they’re under our command at the end of the day when the balloon goes up, because we need to know that.”

 

What about jointly crewed?

 

“If it’s 50-50, that’s not enough,” he said.

 

Surely there is strategic benefit in having a few submarines ready in the South Pacific rather than moored in San Diego?

 

That’s not that big an advantage either, apparently.

 

For Colby, the whole of AUKUS is viewed through practical priorities.

 

I asked him to explain this in the context of Trump’s America First strategy.

 

“America First has baggage, but it's a more business-like approach,” Colby said. America, he said, was divided into three camps when it comes to military strategy.

 

“You have the primacists – or the neo-conservatives – that are traditional like the Mitch McConnell types, then you have on the other side, the restrainers, who are more inward looking (think the Tucker Carlson of America) and then there are people like me, we are more in the middle, the prioritisers,” he said.

 

“Americans need to understand that we have constrained resources. We’re facing a pure superpower for the first time in our history. And really, there are serious fiscal problems where you can’t run the Reagan playbook when you got 100 per cent debt to GDP ratio.”

 

So what about the fact that Australia has promised to contribute $4bn to help America build its submarine industrial base and, on top of that, pay billions of dollars per submarine purchased from the US?

 

Australia has also already made the first $500m payment to the US under AUKUS, when Defence Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles met with his US counterpart in February.

 

“The key thing for Australia, if it were up to me, and I don’t make any predictions about my role, is that we need to understand we have constrained resources,” Colby said before being appointed to his current position.

 

There is a lot to read into statement, particularly given the request made earlier this month by US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth for Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

 

Former US Secretary of the Navy Richard Spencer was asked on Thursday if Colby’s scepticism worried him.

 

“No, I have great respect for Elbridge Colby’s intellectual capability to analyse situations,” he said.

 

“There should be people back testing and asking questions as we go forward, because things are going to change.”

 

Colby’s personal views before Trump’s appointment of him are one thing, but being inside the Trump administration is another.

 

This whole review into AUKUS might turn out to be just another bargaining chip with Australia on tariffs – another test for Trump’s so-called ‘art of the deal’.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/pillar-1-problematic-pillar-2-great-inside-colbys-aukus-mind/news-story/55fc5c2451c18aeb3f814857fd62dd8f

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 15, 2025, 2:40 a.m. No.23182456   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2460 >>2504 >>6845 >>2226

Amazon boosts Australian data centre investment to $20bn as Albanese visits Seattle

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 15 June 2025

 

1/2

 

US global tech giant Amazon will pump $20bn into Australia over five years to expand its data centre network, cloud infrastructure and energy generation, including new investment in three solar farms across Victoria and Queensland.

 

Amazon Web Services chief executive Matt Garman – who leads the company’s cloud, data centre and artificial intelligence business – said the funding pledge out to 2029 was the “largest investment ever announced by a global technology provider in Australia”.

 

Standing alongside Anthony Albanese at Amazon’s Seattle headquarters on Sunday (AEST), Mr Garman was asked whether nuclear power would be required over the long-term to ensure energy-intensive data centres can sustainably harness the full power of AI.

 

With competitors including Microsoft and Google directing major funding and resources into nuclear Small Modular Reactors, Mr Garman has repeatedly outlined the importance of nuclear energy in supporting AI development since becoming AWS chief executive in June last year.

 

After signing agreements last year to support the development of SMRs, Mr Garman declared that nuclear is a “safe source of carbon-free energy that can help power our operations and meet the growing demands of our customers”.

 

Mr Garman, who recently urged British authorities to ramp up nuclear generation alongside renewables to help power the data centres needed for developing artificial intelligence, on Sunday said it was definitely the case that “the explosion of AI requires a lot of power”.

 

“That’s one of the things we’re thinking about. Here in the United States, we see nuclear as part of that portfolio. I think depending on the local set-up and economies and other things, it’s a global question, but there’s no question that we will continue to need more and more power going forward,” Mr Garman said.

 

“It’s an important thing that we spend a lot of time on. But it depends on which source of power we choose. Sometimes it’s renewables sources, sometimes it’s hydro.

 

“From a technology perspective, Australia is incredibly important and a great market for us. From an energy perspective, it’s a portfolio approach for us and I don’t think any one technology is right for every situation.”

 

The $20bn AWS commitment, which incorporates prior funding pledges made by the company, includes expansions of Amazon’s data centres in Sydney and Melbourne, and investment in three new solar projects. The solar farms will be delivered by European Energy, with Amazon committing to purchase a combined capacity of more than 170MW.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 15, 2025, 2:41 a.m. No.23182460   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23182456

 

2/2

 

Amazon already has investments in eight solar and wind projects in Victoria, Queensland and NSW, which help power AWS operations including data and fulfilment centres. Mr Garman said once all 11 renewable energy projects are up-and-running, they will generate more than 1.4 million megawatt hours of emissions-friendly power annually.

 

Mr Albanese said the Amazon investment represents “an exciting opportunity for Australia to build AI capability using secure, resilient infrastructure”.

 

With the Albanese government positioning productivity as a top economic priority during its second term, the Prime Minister said the AWS expansion plans were “exactly the kind of economic investment in our nation that we want to see, and creates opportunities for continued innovation and growth”.

 

“The investment will generate economic opportunity for Australians, including skilled jobs and infrastructure that can support complex AI and supercomputing applications,” Mr Albanese said.

 

Amazon’s investment builds on the $13.2bn commitment it made in 2023 to expand cloud operations in Sydney and Melbourne by 2027. AWS has also been engaged by the government on a $2bn deal to establish a “top secret” data cloud that will store classified military and intelligence information.

 

After AWS helped support the rise of Australia’s biggest tech success stories including Canva and Atlassian, Mr Garman said he was excited about collaborating with CBA and helping the bank harness the power of AI to support a range of services including fraud detection and automated credit scoring, which would assist in matching loans for customers.

 

Asked about warnings issued last week by top energy regulators and executives about spiralling clean energy build-out costs threatening Australia’s ambition to claim a share of the global data centre market, Mr Garman said Amazon’s investment includes renewable projects.

 

“We bring co-ordination. We make sure that we can build those in a sustainable way. We feel confident that with these new wind and solar projects that we’re adding, that brings net new energy to the country and we feel good about those.”

 

Mr Albanese will attend a technology and innovation business reception hosted by Australia’s Ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, in Seattle later on Sunday. The Labor leader will talk-up the strength of the Australia-US trade relationship in front of US-based tech executives from companies including Diraq, Trellis Health, BHP Ventures, Airwallex and Anthropic.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/amazon-boosts-australian-data-centre-investment-to-20bn-as-albanese-visits-seattle/news-story/f6757a3c400a0dda79f5ff2acfa7826f

 

https://www.news.com.au/national/politics/amazon-mega-deal-underscores-economic-relationship-with-us-minister-says/news-story/37ca270baa2a1457dc7f21de071e4a4a

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 15, 2025, 2:56 a.m. No.23182504   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2509 >>6828 >>2204 >>2221 >>2259

>>23163733

>>23174845

>>23182456

PM locks in meeting with Trump to discuss AUKUS, tariffs

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 15 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese will meet Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit to discuss the long-term future of the $368bn AUKUS deal, the strategic importance of the US-Australia relationship in the Indo-Pacific and why Australian companies should be exempt from the US President’s tariffs.

 

The Prime Minister on Sunday (AEST) confirmed he would hold formal bilateral talks with Mr Trump at the Kananaskis summit in Alberta, where leaders of the world’s most powerful western democracies will gather in the next 24-hours under the backdrop of wars in the Middle East and Ukraine.

 

Speaking at the Amazon headquarters, where AWS chief executive Matt Garman announced a $20bn investment over four-years in Australian data centres and renewables projects, Mr Albanese said a meeting with Mr Trump had been locked-in.

 

Mr Albanese, who has spoken three times with the US President since his return to the White House, said while Mr Trump was dealing with major global and domestic issues he expected to have a “constructive engagement” with him. The meeting is expected to occur overnight Tuesday (AEST).

 

“Obviously we will raise tariffs, we will raise the importance of AUKUS. And we will have a discussion as two friends should,” Mr Albanese said.

 

Under pressure from US officials for Australia to urgently lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Mr Albanese said the context of his AUKUS discussions would centre around what Australia contributes and the potential of the military pact in terms of benefits for the US.

 

After the Pentagon last week ordered a snap 30-day review into the AUKUS nuclear submarine agreement, Mr Albanese said he would reiterate to Mr Trump the significant strategic outcomes the deal presents. These include Australia’s substantial financial assistance for the US industrial capability, of which the government has already contributed $500m.

 

“Australia has currently over 100 personnel in Hawaii, working on (nuclear submarine) maintenance, working on skills and contributing there. As well as many more people here in the United States,” Mr Albanese said.

 

“The potential of what’s going to occur, the infrastructure investment at Henderson (shipyards) will be important in increasing the capacity of US submarines, as well as UK submarines, to be in the water for longer and for maintenance to occur there.

 

“The benefit that the presence of US Marines has in the Northern Territory is also important, as well as the fuel reserves that are there in the Northern Territory. There are a range of ways in which Australia’s contribution to the United States, not just through AUKUS pillar one.”

 

Asked about the ideal outcome of negotiations on a tariffs deal, Mr Albanese said the 10 per cent baseline tariff announced by Mr Trump earlier in the year was applied across the board. He refused to pre-empt outcomes before the meeting takes place.

 

“I will put forward Australia’s interests respectfully because it’s also in the interests of the United States for Australia to be treated appropriately. Tariffs across the board, of course, impose an increased cost on the purchases of those goods and services.”

 

“Those goods and services have still been provided here in the United States, and indeed in some sectors. If you look at the beef sector, Australian beef producers have been able to find export destinations as well.

 

“I will enter into those discussions constructively. The discussions that were previously had with President Trump were constructive, but those 10 per cent tariffs, of course, have been the minimum … that have been applied right across the board.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 15, 2025, 2:58 a.m. No.23182509   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23182504

 

2/2

 

Mr Trump is scheduled to arrive in Calgary at 9pm local time on Sunday night (Monday AEDT). He is due to have his first bilateral meeting the following morning and be involved in the official welcome ceremony with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney before participating in the G7 ‘family photo’.

 

The following day Mr Trump will have a working breakfast followed by two bilateral meetings. Following his last bilateral meeting before returning to Washington DC, Mr Trump will hold a press conference.

 

Senior US officials have flagged that Mr Trump would be involved in working discussions across a range of economic and security issues, including the global economy, critical minerals, migrant and drug smuggling, wildfires, international security, artificial intelligence and energy security.

 

They said Mr Trump also wanted to have discussions around making “America’s trade relationships fair and reciprocal, unlocking new markets for American energy exports, and positioning the US to be the world leader and international partner of choice on AI technologies”.

 

In addition to meeting with Mr Trump, Mr Albanese is also expected to hold bilateral meetings with Mr Carney, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German chancellor Friedrich Merz, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and new South Korean president Lee Jae-myung.

 

On the widening conflict between Israel and Iran, which will dominate talks at the G7 summit, Mr Albanese said in response to instability in the world, Australia had “doubled defence spending”.

 

Asked if he would attempt to replicate the deal struck by Mr Starmer with Mr Trump to remove tariffs from British products and use critical minerals as a lever in negotiations, Mr Albanese said “Australia will follow our model”.

 

“Australia has a very different economy and potential from the United Kingdom. We have something in the order of 36 of the 50 critical minerals that have been identified. And Australia is a major contributor in our region to security. And the relationship that we have with the United States is an important one.”

 

“Our trading relationship with the United States is very different as well. We have different biosecurity measures. And we have made it very clear that we want to continue to increase our trade with the United States and we want constructive outcomes.

 

“I’ll put forward Australia’s national interest but I do think that the economies of the UK and Australia are different and hence the engagement will be different as well. Also Australia has the free trade agreement with the United States. One of the things that I will state … is that the United States has enjoyed a very long trade surplus with Australia.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pm-locks-in-meeting-with-trump-to-discuss-aukus-tarriffs/news-story/3c2468820d0bb4341c9175915ddc4bec

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mMk_nEseBQ4

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 16, 2025, 2:30 a.m. No.23186828   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6831 >>2204 >>2221 >>2259

>>23163733

>>23182504

Defence ties with Australia key to Albanese’s pitch in historic Trump meeting

 

James Massola - June 16, 2025

 

1/2

 

Calgary: Anthony Albanese will stare down Donald Trump’s demands for Australia to double its defence spending, but reassure the president the country is a trustworthy partner in the strategic contest with China as the prime minister works to safeguard the AUKUS pact.

 

In a meeting with Trump this week that looms as among the most important of his three decades in politics, Albanese will put access to Australia’s critical minerals on the table as the Trump administration reviews whether AUKUS fits with its “America First” agenda.

 

Asked whether Australia would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the US if China attempted to take Taiwan by force – a source of some concern in some parts of the Trump administration – Albanese did not answer directly on Monday.

 

But the prime minister said AUKUS would play a key peace and security role.

 

“Australia’s a trusted partner to promote peace and security in our region,” Albanese said. “We have been so forever. If you look at the role that Australia has played, [we] will continue to play an important role in the Pacific. The visit that I had on the way here to Fiji is another example and a reminder of the fact that Australia is a trusted partner in the Pacific.”

 

Trump and Albanese’s first face-to-face meeting, which will take place against a backdrop of the Russia-Ukraine war and the Iran-Israel missile strikes, is scheduled for the early hours of Wednesday morning, Australian time, on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada.

 

Australian officials said that anything more than 20 minutes would be regarded as a win within the government after Trump used other meetings with world leaders to stage made-for-TV clashes.

 

Fresh from a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, another world leader who benefited electorally from distancing himself from the US president, Albanese said that he defined success with Trump as being able to argue Australia’s case.

 

“I don’t want to preempt outcomes of meetings [but] a successful meeting is one where we are able … to put forward our position,” Albanese said on Sunday, local time.

 

Australian officials, unauthorised to speak publicly, expect Trump to raise the issue of collective security against China’s rapidly expanding military and ask for more defence spending. Australia spends about 2 per cent of GDP on defence and is on track to increase to 2.3 per cent.

 

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth recently said his country wanted Australia to raise spending by about $40 billion per year to about 3.5 per cent.

 

Albanese has pushed back against that call, arguing Australian defence spending has increased significantly on his watch and that the nation wouldn’t set an arbitrary target before choosing how to spend the extra money.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 16, 2025, 2:32 a.m. No.23186831   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23186828

 

2/2

 

On Monday (AEST), Carney and Albanese discussed deepening defence ties – including through the proposed Canadian acquisition of a sophisticated Australian-made radar system – as well as that country’s participation in AUKUS’ “pillar 2”, which is focused on advanced technology.

 

Earlier this year, Carney won the Canadian election in a major upset, in part by vowing to “stand up” to Trump, who had suggested Canada could become a US state.

 

The Australian prime minister will meet a bevy of leaders when he attends the G7 summit on the edge of the Canadian Rockies mountain range this week, including the prime ministers of England, Japan and Germany, the presidents of France, South Korea and France, and EU leaders.

 

The conflict between Israel and Iran will feature prominently at the summit, as will discussions on access to critical minerals, climate change, energy security and the global economy.

 

But Albanese’s first meeting with Trump at the summit, which will not issue its typical joint communique, has dominated the lead-up to the event and comes at a time when there are an unusual number of sticking points in the usually smooth Australia-US relationship.

 

“Our position when it comes to tariffs is very clear,” Albanese said. “We see tariffs as acts of economic self-harm by the country imposing the tariffs because what it does is lead to increased costs for the country that is making those decisions,” he said.

 

“There aren’t increased steel production facilities that have appeared since January 20 in the United States, the exports are still going in there. They’re just paying more for them.”

 

He defended AUKUS, saying it would support the US’ military industrial capacity, submarine maintenance and bolster the broader defence relationship that includes American soldiers in Darwin.

 

In a veiled reference to China, Albanese argued that the transfer of nuclear-powered submarines to Australia would benefit all three nations and make the Indo-Pacific more secure.

 

Ahead of his meeting with Albanese, Carney highlighted Canada’s recent decision to pursue the purchase of Australia’s Jindalee Operational Radar Network in what would be Australia’s biggest ever defence export deal, worth an estimated $6.5 billion.

 

The radar network, which already operates in Australia and has a range of about 3000 kilometres, would be used by Canada to monitor its northern approaches in the Arctic region, which is increasingly contested and accessible to ships because of climate change.

 

The Canadian prime minister said the two nations were “great partners, share the same values, share many of the same interests in defence, security, a partnership reinforced, actually, by yourself and myself through the over-the-horizon radar [deal]”.

 

Although not a member of the G7, Australia is attending as an outreach partner along with the leaders of Brazil, India, Mexico, South Africa and Ukraine.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/before-meeting-trump-albanese-meets-the-man-who-vowed-to-stand-up-to-the-president-20250616-p5m7n8.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 16, 2025, 2:45 a.m. No.23186845   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6846 >>2226

>>23182456

Albanese faces Labor dissent over Amazon’s access to government contracts

 

JACK QUAIL - 15 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese is facing internal dissent over Amazon’s access to lucrative public contracts, with NSW Labor senator Tony Sheldon calling for the tech giant to be barred from receiving such work, while three ministers are among at least 17 government MPs who have accused the company of exploiting its workers.

 

With the Prime Minister on Saturday (Sunday AEST) visiting the Seattle headquarters of the company’s cloud computing subsidiary Amazon Web Services, fellow NSW Right senator Deb O’Neill backed using government procuring power to hold the company accountable.

 

The multinational has also been condemned by a host of Labor MPs including Helen Polley, Tania Lawrence, Matt Burnell, Cassandra Fernando, Marielle Smith, Luke Gosling, Raff Ciccone, Dave Smith, Jana Stewart, Varun Ghosh and Glenn Sterle, who have accused the firm of undermining labour laws and employing tax avoidance tactics.

 

Amazon has also been criticised in federal parliament by Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino, Aged Care and Seniors Minister Sam Rae, as well as Assistant Resources Minister Anthony Chisholm.

 

In recent years, Amazon has emerged as a key recipient of government contracts, with AWS securing work with the Australian Taxation Office, CSIRO, Treasury, and the Department of Defence – including a $2bn agreement to develop and operate top-secret data centres in partnership with national security agencies.

 

Despite criticism from within Labor, Mr Albanese met with AWS chief executive Matt Garman at the weekend, where he witnessed a new $7bn funding pledge by the tech giant to help support the booming demand for artificial intelligence in Australia.

 

The commitment will support the expansion of its data centre networks in Sydney and Melbourne and underwrite solar farms in Victoria and Queensland to meet its energy demands.

 

Mr Albanese’s office declined to comment on Sunday when asked about criticism of Amazon within Labor’s ranks.

 

The internal disquiet over Amazon comes as Communication Minister Anika Wells is set to sign off on one of the biggest federal government contracts with the company – a deal with the National Broadband Network to deliver satellite internet services to the bush.

 

Under the agreement, expected to total hundreds of millions of dollars, Amazon subsidiary Kuiper Systems will provide low-latency internet access to the NBN’s rural and remote customers via its constellation of 3000 low-Earth orbit satellites.

 

Neither Ms Wells – who in 2021 accused Amazon of employing an “exploitative model” in its on-demand delivery arm Amazon Flex – nor the NBN responded to a request for comment.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 16, 2025, 2:46 a.m. No.23186846   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23186845

 

2/2

 

One of Amazon’s most outspoken critics within Labor is Senator Sheldon, who has labelled the multinational “the worst corporate actor in Australia” and accused it of operating a business model that “destroys the communities it operates in” and “destroys livelihoods”.

 

In November, Senator Sheldon, a former secretary of the Transport Workers Union, insisted that Labor “can and must go further” in its crackdown on the tech giant, urging the government to deny it access to lucrative government contracts.

 

“It’s time we consider ending the supply of government contracts to Amazon until it proves it is capable of making a positive contribution to our economy,” he said at the time.

 

Asked if he stood by his previous comments, Senator Sheldon said: “The government has the largest purchasing power in the country and that’s why it’s critical that our procurement practices meet community expectations of value for money and ethical behaviour, including fair labour standards.”

 

Senator O’Neill, who enjoys the backing of the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (SDA) – a longstanding critic of Amazon’s approach to workplace practices – has similarly implored the government to use its buying power to “hold Amazon to account”.

 

Late last year, she criticised the multinational for being “anti-worker and fiercely anti-union”, while claiming it had engaged in “countless examples of calculated exploitation” of its workforce.

 

She has accused the company of acting as a “champion tax dodger” and argued that lucrative government contracts had helped “power the Amazon behemoth and keep its practices going.”

 

In response to questions about those remarks, Senator O’Neill said: “I stand by my previous comments.”

 

Amazon Australia did not comment on the claims made by Labor MPs.

 

Under current government procurement regulations, public funds must not be used to support unethical or unsafe supplier practices, such as tax avoidance or worker exploitation.

 

The ACTU, alongside the TWU and the SDA, are pushing Labor to tighten procurement rules to block multinational corporations – including Amazon – from accessing billions in federal contracts unless they end practices the unions claim are unethical.

 

Labor sources acknowledged there was a need for further changes, with one senior MP admitting it had done a “pretty shit job” of reforming federal procurement rules in its first term. They expected the matter would be revisited in caucus during this term of parliament.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/albanese-faces-labor-dissent-over-amazons-access-to-government-contracts/news-story/185f50074aa8592540192a4f72b922ee

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 16, 2025, 2:54 a.m. No.23186849   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3311 >>2682 >>2691 >>2157

>>23158072

>>23174845

>>23182420

Hundreds of Australians seek help to leave Israel and Iran

 

Tom Crowley - 16 June 2025

 

Several hundred Australians have registered interest in leaving Israel and Iran amid escalating hostilities between the two countries, but have been advised to shelter where they are while airspace remains closed.

 

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said 300 Australians had advised the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) of their desire to leave Israel, and 350 Australians had done so for Iran, with more registrations expected.

 

Senator Wong said that while no flights are possible yet given the risk of missile strikes on civilian aircraft, the government was working on "a range of plans" to help people leave when safe.

 

"I understand how concerned, how distressed many Australians are about what is occurring. I understand how particularly those who are in the Middle East, in Israel or Iran, how worrying this situation is, and how frightening it is," she told reporters on Monday.

 

At least 224 people have been killed in Iran and 13 in Israel after several days of strikes.

 

The episode began on Friday, local time, with an Israeli strike on Iran which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said was an attempt to destroy nuclear facilities behind what he said would be an "existential threat to Israel".

 

It came shortly after the UN nuclear watchdog concluded Iran was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty, and shortly before planned talks with the United States.

 

Wong repeats calls for de-escalation

 

Senator Wong repeated calls for "de-escalation", a view she said she had conveyed to her counterparts in both countries and was shared by the UK, Canada and France, and was "consistent with what President Trump has said".

 

"No-one doubts the threat Iran poses, we have long been speaking about this as an international community," she said.

 

"But what I would say is we don't want to see an escalation which leads to … dire consequences for the people of the region."

 

Australian citizens, permanent residents and family members with entry rights are eligible to register their interest in an assisted departure with DFAT and are encouraged to do so on the official Smartraveller website.

 

That website also provides up-to-date official guidance for those who are in Israel or Iran. The government currently advises people to listen to local authorities, who are telling residents to shelter in place. It also advises those outside Israel and Iran to not travel there.

 

"Obviously that is a very difficult thing to say to people but that is the advice that we have," she said.

 

Earlier, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese echoed calls for de-escalation.

 

"I have expressed before our concern about Iran gaining the capacity of nuclear weapons as something that is a threat to security in the region. But we, along with other like-minded countries, do want to see that priority on dialogue and diplomacy," he told reporters in Canada, where he is attending a G7 summit.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-16/australians-seek-help-to-leave-israel-and-iran/105422940

 

https://www.smartraveller.gov.au/news-and-updates/conflict-middle-east

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 16, 2025, 3:05 a.m. No.23186853   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6860 >>2228

>>22968851

>>23111605

USS America, USS San Diego, USS Rushmore arrive in Sydney with 31st Marines

 

Robert Dougherty - 16 JUNE 2025

 

The US Navy amphibious assault ship USS America has arrived in Sydney during a routine stop for troops from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit.

 

The flagship of the America Strike Group brings more than 2,500 sailors and marines to Sydney under a US scheduled port visit from 14 June.

 

The ship brings significant capabilities to the region, including a detachment of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 242, equipped with the advanced F-35B Lightning II aircraft.

 

“Sydney’s warm welcome has been exceptional,” according to USS America Commanding Officer Captain Ethan Rule.

 

“This port visit provides a valuable opportunity to strengthen the bonds between our nations, experience Australia’s unique culture, and reinforce our shared values.”

 

Royal Australian Navy Liaison Officer, LCDR Craig Hamilton is currently serving aboard USS America with the mission of fostering seamless cooperation and interoperability between the two navies.

 

He will host Australian military and government officials for a tour of the ship, highlighting its capabilities and the close partnership between the US and Australia.

 

“The US-Australia alliance is a cornerstone of peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific,” said Erika Olson, chargé d’affaires, US mission to Australia.

 

“The arrival of America, USS San Diego and USS Rushmore marks the first time that the three-ship America Strike Group are together in Sydney.

 

“We are excited to have sailors and marines here, and warmly welcome them to Sydney.”

 

The US 7th Fleet is the US Navy’s largest forward-deployed numbered fleet and routinely interacts and operates with allies and partners to preserve a free and open Indo-Pacific region.

 

The USS America is joined by amphibious transport dock ship USS San Diego and amphibious dock landing ship USS Rushmore and embarked elements from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit.

 

“I want to thank the city of Sydney for their hospitality and the warm welcome of the America Amphibious Ready Group (ARG),” said Capt. John Baggett, commodore of Amphibious Squadron 11, which oversees the America Amphibious Ready Group (ARG).

 

“Our port visit allows us to deepen friendships with our Australian allies, which is instrumental to our two nations’ forces operating together to maintain regional peace and stability.”

 

This marks the first time America, San Diego, and Rushmore are moored in Sydney at the same time.

 

America, San Diego, and Rushmore are part of the America Strike group, which is capable of responding to a range of military operations, including combat operations and humanitarian assistance and disaster response.

 

https://www.defenceconnect.com.au/naval/16230-uss-america-uss-san-diego-uss-rushmore-arrive-in-sydney-with-31st-marines

 

https://au.usembassy.gov/uss-america-arrives-in-sydney/

 

https://x.com/USEmbAustralia/status/1934138030383853983

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 16, 2025, 3:19 a.m. No.23186860   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2228

>>23186853

USS America docks in Sydney after 30 days at sea

 

Amphibious assault ship USS America has steamed into Sydney Harbour, with its 2500-strong ready to hit the town. Our in-house American James Morrow checked out life on board.

 

James Morrow - June 14, 2025

 

If you seem to be hearing a lot of American accents in Sydney this week, you’re not hallucinating.

 

At noon on Saturday, the amphibious assault ship USS America steamed into Sydney Harbour with its crew of around 2500 American sailors and marines ready for a bit of shore leave after a 30-day cruise from their home base in Japan.

 

As The Sunday Telegraph’s in-house American, I was offered the chance to chopper out to the ship aboard a Seahawk helicopter with a small delegation to meet the crew and check out life aboard the ship.

 

After a quick but thorough safety briefing and the distribution of flotation devices and helmets (“cranials”, in navy-speak), our delegation was whisked via Seahawk helicopter to the ship as it steamed its way towards the Heads.

 

Aboard, an atmosphere of tightly controlled chaos reigned as the crew readied the America for arrival at Garden Island, nimbly navigating the ship’s disorienting network of gangways, ramps, and stairs.

 

Tilt-wing Ospreys sat arrayed towards the ship’s bow, further astern were a number of the Pentagon’s prized F35B fighter jets.

 

Able to land vertically like a helicopter on the America’s relatively short flight deck, and equipped with impossibly advanced computer systems, one aviator would be heard to remark that there was “magic in those machines”.

 

Elsewhere, excited sailors went about the business of bringing the ship in safely while also revealing their plans for their leave in Australia – almost all of them as first-time visitors.

 

One, an avid outdoorsman, revealed his plans to go to the Blue Mountains for a day.

 

Another junior officer studying to earn his stripes as a surface warfare officer confessed to being a “big foodie” who was looking forward to checking out some good rooftop bars.

 

This correspondent tried to warn a pair of marines about the threat of “drop bears” but our cover was blown when Lt Commander Craig Hamilton – a Royal Australian Navy officer from Goomeri, QLD on a two-year posting to the ship – laughed a little too loudly.

 

Hamilton said that while he loved the ship, he was thrilled to be back in Australia and was “looking forward to catching up with my brother, who’s also in the navy, for a couple of beers”.

 

https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/uss-america-docks-in-sydney-after-30-days-at-sea/news-story/80235ac0e70afa2ff9fcc80e83085b80

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 17, 2025, 1:50 a.m. No.23192204   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2206 >>2221 >>2260

>>23163733

>>23182504

>>23186828

PM in subs, regional pitch to keep Trump sweet

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 16 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese will use the $368bn AUKUS nuclear submarine deal and Australia’s expanding role in the South Pacific to reassure Donald Trump’s administration that his government is committed to countering Chinese military aggression in the Indo-Pacific.

 

Ahead of his critical first in-person meeting with the US President on Wednesday (AEST), which is scheduled for at least 20 minutes on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, Mr Albanese has launched a major defence of his government’s backing of the US in terms of military support and increased security co-ordination.

 

Amid concerns about Xi Jinping’s military build-up in the ­region, there are now more US marines based in Australia than since the end of World War II, and joint defence and intelligence operations have been ramped up to unprecedented levels.

 

The Australian Defence Force is preparing to host more than 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations next month as part of the 11th Australia-US led Exercise Talisman Sabre, which will for the first time include training sites in Papua New Guinea.

 

The Australian understands the Prime Minister is preparing to green-light US access to Australia’s critical minerals as Western nations grapple with China’s dominance in the supply of the ­resources.

 

Canberra is also lifting defence investment to allow US naval ships to dock and be maintained at domestic ports. The commitments will be used to ensure Mr Trump sticks with the AUKUS deal, which is currently subject to a snap 30-day review by the Pentagon.

 

Under both Joe Biden’s and Mr Trump’s administrations, US officials have consistently expressed serious concerns over China’s military expansion, aggression and aspirations to reclaim Taiwan. Some have also privately voiced anxieties about Australia’s commitment to joining them in battle with China if required in the event of conflict.

 

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth, who last month urged Defence Minister Richard Marles to lift Australia’s defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP “as soon as possible”, has warned that by 2027 China could invade Taiwan and spark a major regional war.

 

Asked on Monday (AEST) if Mr Trump could be confident that Australian would stand side-by-side with the US in the event of conflict in the Indo-Pacific or China invading Taiwan, Mr Albanese said the AUKUS nuclear submarine pact and deeper engagement with Indo-Pacific ­allies was focused on “peace and security in the region”.

 

“Australia is a trusted partner to promote peace and security in our region. We have been so forever, if you look at the role that Australia has played,” Mr Albanese said.

 

While deflecting a question on whether Mr Trump would raise China with him, Mr Albanese pointed to his meeting with Fijian Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka in Nadi last Friday as a “reminder that Australia is a trusted partner in the Pacific”.

 

Mr Albanese, who has spoken with Mr Trump three times on the phone since his return to the White House, has ramped up his government’s focus on diplomatic and military ties with South Pacific nations, which are being targeted by big-spending Chinese officials.

 

“We’ll continue to play an important role in the Pacific. What that does is to add to security in our region. That is our job. That is what we do. And we all want to see that advance,” he said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 17, 2025, 1:51 a.m. No.23192206   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23192204

 

2/2

 

As Mr Albanese and other world leaders seek new trade and defence partnerships to insulate themselves from rising geostrategic competition, Mr Albanese has flagged the potential of Canada co-operating with Australia, the US and Britain under the AUKUS pillar two stream. After meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in Calgary, Mr Albanese confirmed they discussed “pillar two and Canada’s desire to be involved”.

 

In a meeting on Wednesday (AEST) with European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa, Mr ­Albanese is also expected to green-light formal discussions on a non-binding bilateral security and defence partnership with the EU. Mr Albanese has asked Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Mr Marles to launch negotiations with their EU counterparts.

 

The EU currently has security pacts with seven countries, including Japan, South Korea and Britain. The pact would be a non-binding memorandum of understanding designed to expand collaboration between Australia and the EU on defence industry, cyber, critical tech and counter-terrorism.

 

The meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Albanese is expected to occur shortly before the US President departs Canada. G7 leaders will heavily focus discussions on the wars in the Middle East and Ukraine.

 

Other topics on the G7 agenda include energy security, the global economy, geopolitical instability, migration and people-smuggling, climate change and wildfires.

 

Mr Albanese on Tuesday (AEST) will meet with new South Korean President Lee Jae-myung and NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte before attending a G7 welcome reception and dinner with other world leaders invited by Mr Carney to attend the summit. He will attend the G7 summit at the Pomeroy Kananaskis Mountain Lodge on Wednesday (AEST) and participate in talks ­focused on the future of global ­energy security.

 

On the final day of the G7, Mr Albanese will hold bilateral meetings with French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and Mr Trump.

 

Asked what a successful meeting with the US President would look like, Mr Albanese cited tariffs and AUKUS. “A successful meeting is one where we are able to … put forward our position,” he said. “Our position when it comes to tariffs is very clear. We see tariffs as acts of economic self-harm by the country imposing the tariffs because what it does is lead to increased costs for the country that is making those decisions.

 

“I would hope that over a period of time, the United States revisits that position.

 

“On AUKUS, it is very much in the interest of all three countries. What AUKUS offers the United States is, firstly, the support that we’re providing for their industrial capacity. Secondly, the increased capacity to have their subs in the water, as well, because of the maintenance facilities that will take place at Henderson. In ­addition to that, there’s all of the support that we give to the United States and with our defence relationships, including fuel reserves in the Northern Territory, including the presence of US forces in Darwin as well.”

 

Mr Albanese said there were a range of benefits in Australia, ­Britain and the US “all having ­increased nuclear-powered submarines”.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/pm-in-subs-regional-pitch-to-keep-trump-sweet/news-story/6a6fbd2845e0b145ebc3bab805cf9d29

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 17, 2025, 2 a.m. No.23192221   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2223 >>2231 >>2240 >>2280 >>7936 >>7948 >>3238 >>3273 >>3311 >>2707 >>2722 >>2728 >>8742 >>0188 >>4836 >>4844 >>9557 >>9568 >>8416 >>8432 >>2157

>>23182504

>>23186828

>>23192204

Albanese’s meeting with Trump cancelled because of Iran-Israel war

 

James Massola and Michael Koziol - June 17, 2025

 

1/2

 

Calgary: Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will have to wait until at least September to take Australia’s case on the AUKUS defence pact directly to Donald Trump, after the US president was forced to leave the G7 summit early to deal with the crisis in the Middle East.

 

The White House confirmed the departure while Albanese was holding a press conference at the summit on issues that he would be discussing with Trump, including trade and AUKUS.

 

Trump’s decision to fly home early is a blow for Albanese, who was due to meet the president face to face for the first time on Wednesday morning (Australian time) to emphasise Australia’s defence contributions as the US reviews the AUKUS submarine deal and calls for more military spending.

 

The government played down the president’s decision to leave, arguing it was understandable against the backdrop of escalating conflict in the Middle East and affected the leaders of Mexico and Ukraine as well.

 

But it leaves Albanese behind numerous other world leaders who have secured time with the president. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on X that Trump had a good day at the G7 and signed a trade deal with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer.

 

“Much was accomplished, but because of what’s going on in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with Heads of State,” she said on X.

 

Fox News reported Trump dined with the G7 leaders in Canada, and then immediately left for Washington. Australia, which is not a member of the G7, was not invited to attend the dinner.

 

Albanese was instead invited to a function with the heads of other nations in the same category such as South Korea and Mexico.

 

It is not the first time Trump has left a G7 meeting early. In 2018, after contentious sessions with world leaders over trade and Russia’s exclusion from the group, Trump departed hours before the summit ended and headed for Singapore, where he met North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un.

 

Albanese had also planned to lobby Trump to wind back 50 per cent tariffs imposed on Australian steel and aluminium and a 10 per cent tariff on other goods entering the United States.

 

A spokeswoman for the prime minister said that the president’s departure was “understandable” as conflict escalates between Israel and Iran.

 

“As the prime minister said a short time ago, we are very concerned about the events in the Middle East and continue to urge all parties to prioritise dialogue and diplomacy,” the spokeswoman said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 17, 2025, 2:01 a.m. No.23192223   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23192221

 

2/2

 

Speaking in Canberra on Tuesday, Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the president’s decision was unsurprising and that the prime minister would have other opportunities to build on his relationship with Trump.

 

“Obviously, this was always a chance of happening, given what we’re seeing in the Middle East,” Chalmers said. “This is a perilous moment.”

 

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Trump’s decision was understandable, given the conflict in the Middle East, but was bad for Australia.

 

“This was an important opportunity for the prime minister to seek assurances on AUKUS and protect Australia from tariffs,” Ley said.

 

“Given global volatility and the growing list of issues in our relationship with the United States, this underscores that the Albanese government should not have merely relied on meeting with the president on the sidelines of international summits.

 

“The prime minister should have been more proactive in seeking to strengthen this relationship,” she said.

 

“The Coalition reiterates our offer of support to the Albanese government to work with them in any capacity we can to advance our national interest. We want them to succeed.”

 

But Liberal senator Dave Sharma went further than Ley, saying the loss of the meeting was “an abject failure of Australian diplomacy” and posting a list of foreign leaders who had got time with the president on X.

 

Albanese had been scheduled to meet Trump only for about 20 minutes of the G7 summit, a gathering of most of the world’s largest and most important economies.

 

Albanese now plans to travel to the United States in September to address the UN General Assembly in New York, with the government hoping to secure a longer and more substantial meeting with Trump in the White House.

 

Earlier, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer held a joint press conference with Trump. The British leader said that “we’re proceeding with” AUKUS and that the submarine deal, which will see Australia purchase up to five Virginia-class submarines, was “really important” to both the US and UK.

 

Trump added that “we’re very long-time partners and allies and friends, and we’ve become friends in a short period of time”.

 

Albanese said the comments by Starmer and Trump were “very positive”. “It is in Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom’s interests that AUKUS not just proceed.”

 

He argued Australia would assist the US with maintenance at its Henderson base in Perth “which will mean that American subs can stay in the water for longer and that their maintenance is much more efficient, and their capacity to be in the Indian Ocean and in the region around Australia will be much greater as well.”

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-s-meeting-with-trump-meeting-cancelled-because-of-iran-israel-war-20250617-p5m7ym.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIO6Ntxs3vw

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 17, 2025, 2:05 a.m. No.23192231   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2157

>>23192221

Donald Trump left G7 before one-on-one with Anthony Albanese

 

Maani Truu - 17 June 2025

 

Anthony Albanese's one-on-one meeting with Donald Trump has been abandoned, after the American president departed the three-day G7 summit early citing developments in the Middle East.

 

The planned talks were highly anticipated, particularly after the Trump administration revealed it was reviewing the $368 billion AUKUS submarine deal last week.

 

News of Mr Trump's unexpected departure broke just minutes after the prime minister told a media conference in Calgary that he "looked forward to the meeting and looked forward to it taking place".

 

The face-to-face meeting - which would have been the first between the two leaders - was scheduled to take place on the sidelines of the summit on Wednesday morning.

 

But in a statement posted to social media on Tuesday, US Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Mr Trump would instead be returning to Washington after dinner.

 

"President Trump had a great day at the G7, even signing a major trade deal with the United Kingdom and Prime Minister Keir Starmer," the statement read.

 

"Much was accomplished, but because of what's happening in the Middle East, President Trump will be leaving tonight after dinner with the Heads of State."

 

The president had planned to hold other meetings with world leaders, including Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, that were also scrapped.

 

Mr Albanese had previously said he intended to raise the Trump administration's tariffs on Australian exports and the AUKUS partnership during the high-stakes talks.

 

In a statement, a spokesperson for the prime minister said Mr Trump's decision to leave early was understandable "given what is occurring in the Middle East".

 

"As the prime minister said a short time ago, we are very concerned about the events in the Middle East and continue to urge all parties to prioritise dialogue and diplomacy," they said.

 

Back in Australia, Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles also downplayed the significance of the president's cancellation.

 

"We shouldn't be reading more into it than that, this is essentially the American president needing to deal with what is obviously playing out in the world today," he told reporters on Tuesday.

 

"We have seen our prime minister and the president have a number of phone calls to date, they are building a rapport, we have been able to deal with our issues with the United States, [and] I'm sure that in the not to distance future they will meet face-to-face."

 

Albanese set expectations for talks

 

Mr Albanese appeared unaware of any changes to the president's plans as he spoke to reporters in Calgary, suggesting it would be unreasonable to expect that the meeting would result in the complete removal of the tariffs.

 

"When I first raised with President Trump the issue of tariffs, of course, he said he would give it great consideration," he told reporters.

 

"I would expect that that will continue and that we'll continue to put forward our case as we have in all of the discussions that I've had with President Trump."

 

The prime minister said he had prepared extensively for his talks with Mr Trump, including by conferring with United States Ambassador Kevin Rudd and golfing great Greg Norman, who is friends with the president.

 

"I take that responsibility seriously and I look forward to tomorrow's meeting," he said.

 

Mr Albanese was also asked whether the president had responded to his invitation to visit Australia, to which he said Mr Trump would "always be a welcome guest".

 

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley echoed the government's comments that the cancellation was understandable, but added that the prime minister should have "been more proactive in seeking to strengthen" Australia's most important relationship.

 

"This was an important opportunity for the prime minister to seek assurances on AUKUS and protect Australia from tariffs," she said in a statement.

 

"Given global volatility and the growing list of issues in our relationship with the United States, this underscores that the Albanese government should not have merely relied on meeting with the president on the sidelines of international summits."

 

The prime minister will go ahead with other planned meetings on Wednesday, including with European leaders and Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-17/trump-to-leave-g7-early-albanese-meeting/105425602

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OcsudTjKP34

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 17, 2025, 2:12 a.m. No.23192240   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2242 >>2159

>>23192221

Anthony Albanese still can’t get a sit-down meeting with Donald Trump

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 17 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Donald Trump’s shock decision to leave the G7 summit early and cancel his meeting with Anthony Albanese has put the Prime Minister in a politically awkward position that has immediately drawn criticism over when he will sit down in person with the US President.

 

Trump, who is dealing with a genuine threat that the Israel-Iran war could morph into a wider Middle East war and draw in US armed forces, has left Albanese in an embarrassing position after weeks of build-up that the pair would finally develop their relationship beyond three phone calls.

 

Just minutes after Albanese finished a late afternoon press conference in Calgary, which is about one hour away from the G7 summit action in the Canadian mountainside town of Kananaskis, Mr Trump’s press secretary Karoline Leavitt delivered the news that Australian officials had been dreading – the meeting was off. Over recent days as the Middle East conflict escalated, Albanese and his ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, had been concerned the long-awaited meeting with Trump may not eventuate.

 

Albanese was scheduled to speak with Trump for at least 20 minutes about 5.15pm local time on Tuesday afternoon (Wednesday AEST), shortly before the PM returned home from Canada. The 62-year-old was expected to be the second last leader to hold talks with Trump before the US President jetted home to deal with the war.

 

In the past five days, Albanese has caught up with other key strategic allies and partners in Canada and Fiji. But overwhelmingly, the purpose of the trip was geared around the meeting with Trump. Albanese is not the only leader who misses out on a G7 meet with Trump. But the abrupt cancellation will spark criticism from detractors who will describe it as a “snub” and say it is proof that Australia does not rate highly on Trump’s radar.

 

There was one bright spot for Albanese.

 

Shortly before he spoke with reporters, Trump appeared to back in the $368bn AUKUS nuclear submarine defence pact that is currently subject to a snap 30-day Pentagon review.

 

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who had a huge win after Trump exempted the UK from his trade tariffs because “I like them”, put the billionaire on the spot over AUKUS after the pair clinched a sweeping new economic prosperity deal.

 

Standing next to Trump after their G7 bilateral meeting, Starmer responded to a question on the nuclear submarine deal by declaring “we’re proceeding” with AUKUS. Trump nodded his head and responded by saying “we’re very long-time partners and allies and friends” and noted he and Starmer had “become friends in a short period of time”.

 

Albanese’s meeting with Starmer on Wednesday will be important. He will be able to exchange notes with the British PM on his talks with Trump on AUKUS, how he won exemptions and how to deal with the wildcard president.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 17, 2025, 2:12 a.m. No.23192242   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23192240

 

2/2

 

While it’s difficult to pin the blame on Australian officials over the cancelled meeting given events in the Middle East and chaotic planning in Trump’s White House, Rudd will be targeted by critics who question whether he has enough reach to get Australia the access it needs in Washington.

 

Ironically, if Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney had followed the lead of previous summit hosts and invited guest leaders to participate in joint sessions with G7 leaders, Albanese would at least had the opportunity for a meet-and-greet photo and casual chat with Trump.

 

Despite meeting with virtually all of the G7 leaders except Trump, the heads of the European Union and European Council, and NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte, the final day of Albanese’s one-week overseas trip won’t have the impact he had hoped for.

 

Trump’s 24-hour return to the world summit stage had all the unpredictability you would expect.

 

His comments that Vladimir Putin shouldn’t have been ejected from the then G8 and that China should be invited to join goes to the heart of his belief that historic groupings such as the G7 and G20 have lost their way. As Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa form their own bloc after being excluded from the G7, Trump knows the West can no longer sit back and allow the BRICS (which includes Iran) to usurp their waning power.

 

The drift into irrelevance for traditional western powers will continue without change, and some leaders, such as Starmer and Carney, understand that.

 

Trump’s call for allies, including Australia, to stop relying on the US and start paying their fair share on defence spending and capability is all about strengthening western democracies under fire from an aggressive Chinese and Russian led autocratic bloc.

 

Albanese, who due to the May 3 election decided to not travel to the White House immediately after Trump’s inauguration in January as other leaders did, will have further chances to get a deal on tariff exemptions and lock-in the AUKUS pact.

 

The pair will cross paths at upcoming leaders meetings and there is growing speculation that Albanese may score a White House visit when he travels, as expected, to New York for the UN leaders gathering in September.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/anthony-albanese-still-cant-get-a-sitdown-meeting-with-donald-trump/news-story/3ba31fe9dd4bd872a1d7e593e9d719f1

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 17, 2025, 2:37 a.m. No.23192280   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7936 >>2707 >>2722 >>2260

>>23163733

>>23192221

Anthony Albanese relies on Keir Starmer to secure Donald Trump’s backing for AUKUS

 

BEN PACKHAM - 17 June 2025

 

When it comes to AUKUS, Anthony Albanese is lucky to have Sir Keir Starmer in his corner.

 

Australia’s Prime Minister has missed his chance, for now, to personally win Donald Trump’s direct support for the submarine pact, with the US President departing the G7 in Canada to deal with the Middle East war.

 

But amid a snap 30-day review of AUKUS ordered by the Trump administration, the British Prime Minister appears to have secured presidential backing for the deal.

 

Unlike Albanese, Sir Keir managed to get a meeting with Trump before he skipped town.

 

Asked later at a joint press conference with the President whether the trilateral subs deal was proceeding, the pair looked at each other and nodded in agreement.

 

Answering for them both, Sir Keir said: “Yep, we’re proceeding with that, it’s a really important deal to both of us.”

 

While not quite from the horse’s mouth, the statement will be a relief for Albanese.

 

Britain can build its nuclear submarines if need be, but Australia would be up the proverbial creek if the AUKUS deal fell over.

 

The navy’s six Collins-class boats are on their last legs, even with planned life-extending upgrades. After having run down the clock with false starts on Japanese and French submarines, the collapse of AUKUS would leave Australia without a viable submarine force for decades.

 

And as the government has warned, only nuclear-powered submarines offer the capability Australia needs to stealthily deter Chinese threats.

 

The fact Albanese has to rely on Sir Keir to get Trump to endorse the AUKUS deal is somewhat embarrassing for him, but he’ll take any help he can get.

 

Sir Keir and Trump get along well, despite their political differences. “He’s slightly more liberal than I am, but for some reason we get along,” Trump said after their meeting in Kananaskis, Alberta.

 

Albanese and Trump have had three phone conversations but are yet to meet in person. And there are question marks over the PM’s ability to win over the unpredictable President. Trump is also renowned for tearing up deals signed by his predecessors, and key figures in the Trump administration are deeply sceptical of AUKUS.

 

The Albanese government has put on a brave face after the review announcement, arguing it’s normal for an incoming government to run the rule over such a big undertaking.

 

Yet there are very real concerns about the US’s long-term commitment to the deal and its ability to deliver a promised three to five Virginia-class submarines to Australia before supporting the US and Britain to build their own fleets of SSN AUKUS subs.

 

The US is building 1.2 Virginia boats a year but needs to turn out at least 2.33 a year to have enough to give to Australia without undermining its submarine force.

 

The US’s influential Pentagon deputy Elbridge Colby told a British think tank last year he would have been “quite sceptical” about signing off the AUKUS agreement, saying its benefits were “questionable … My concern is, why are we giving away this crown jewel asset when we most need it?

 

“AUKUS is only going to lead to more submarines collectively in 10, 15, 20 years, way beyond the window of maximum danger, which is in this decade.”

 

Colby is also concerned that any submarines given to Australia might not be made available in the event of a war with China over Taiwan. The results of the review are likely to elaborate on these problems and more.

 

But Trump’s nod for AUKUS looks like keeping open the “optimal pathway” for us to acquire nuclear submarines … for now.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/anthony-albanese-relies-on-keir-starmer-to-secure-donald-trumps-backing-for-aukus/news-story/6454b955894fc823ac3d4b57369cbebc

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 2:14 a.m. No.23197936   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7937 >>7948 >>3238 >>2229

>>23192221

>>23192280

Australia races to lock in new meeting with Trump to avoid second snub

 

James Massola - June 18, 2025

 

1/2

 

Kananaskis: Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, is leading a diplomatic push to lock in a meeting for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese with US President Donald Trump in Europe next week, which would force Albanese to depart Australia again just days after returning from his failed attempt to meet Trump in Canada.

 

The president is scheduled to be at the NATO summit beginning June 24 in The Hague, and a meeting would give the prime minister a chance to press Australia’s case with the US on the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, defence spending and tariffs.

 

But the risk that Trump could cancel to deal with escalating conflict in the Middle East presents a dilemma for Albanese, who has tried to brush off the blow of Trump cancelling their meeting at the G7 for the same reason.

 

A day after saying he expected Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles would attend the NATO summit, Albanese changed his mind and said he could go. “Yes, that’s being considered,” he told reporters travelling with him at the G7 summit in Canada.

 

Sources familiar with Australia’s diplomatic approach, who weren’t authorised to speak publicly, said Rudd was leading work on a potential meeting and that Albanese was unlikely to go to NATO unless time with Trump was certain.

 

While Rudd is leading the push to secure the meeting, Albanese has also sought advice from Greg Norman about how to build a connection with Trump. The strategy mirrors the playbook of Malcolm Turnbull, who also turned to the professional golfer to get in touch with Trump in 2016.

 

The White House confirmed two weeks ago that Trump would attend the NATO summit, which is expected to focus on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the ongoing war between Israel and Iran. Yet on Wednesday morning, a US State Department official said that Trump’s plan to attend could change because of the “rapidly changing situation in the Middle East”.

 

Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum tweeted on Wednesday morning that she had received a phone call from Trump after her own meeting was cancelled, but Albanese said he had not had a similar phone call.

 

Instead of an audience with the US president in Canada, the prime minister met with three of Trump’s most senior economic advisers, salvaging some time with White House officials.

 

Joined by Rudd, Albanese met Kevin Hassett, Trump’s director of the National Economic Council, and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. He then met US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent for about 20 minutes.

 

The discussions focused on trade between the two nations, the US imposition of tariffs on Australian aluminium, iron ore and other goods and Australia’s willingness to be a reliable supplier of critical minerals and rare earths to the US.

 

Albanese played down the fact that he had not received a call from Trump as Sheinbaum had.

 

“We’re mature about the circumstances of what happened. It’s perfectly understandable. We’ll reschedule a meeting. From time to time, that is what occurs,” he said.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 2:15 a.m. No.23197937   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23197936

 

2/2

 

In a whirlwind final day of meetings, Albanese met with world leaders including Britain’s Sir Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba, French President Emmanuel Macron, European Union Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.

 

In an unguarded moment, Albanese embraced Zelensky as the G7 leaders gathered for the so-called family photo at the foot of Canada’s spectacular Rocky Mountains.

 

Australia has been one of the largest non-NATO contributors of assistance – including weapons systems such as the Abrams M1 tank – to Ukraine in its brutal war with Russia. Albanese and Zelensky have previously met in Kyiv.

 

Albanese and Starmer met in the final hours of the summit for discussions that focused on the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, which is currently under review by the US, as well as the war in Ukraine and deepening trade ties.

 

Starmer said the bilateral relationship “could not be stronger in my view”, which he backed with an invitation for Albanese to visit the UK.

 

Following the meeting with Starmer, Albanese was asked if the UK prime minister had indicated whether the US president was still supportive of the AUKUS pact that binds the three nations.

 

“I’ve seen nothing to suggest otherwise,” he said. It’s not up to me to speak on behalf of others … But Prime Minister Starmer, of course, has made public statements and the US Defence Secretary has made clear statements as well.”

 

At the beginning of his discussion with Germany’s Merz, the chancellor noted that free trade negotiations between Australia and the EU had restarted recently after being put on hold in October 2023.

 

The deal stalled because of disagreements over Australian farmers gaining increased access to the giant EU market, and disagreement over naming protections for European products such as cheese and wine.

 

In a brief exchange between Albanese and Merz that was open to the media, the German leader asked: “Is there anything I can do to speed it up a little bit?” referring to the trade deal, to which Albanese replied, “We are very keen on getting it done quickly”.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/trump-left-the-g7-and-albanese-in-the-lurch-but-the-pm-salvaged-something-20250618-p5m8ao.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 2:29 a.m. No.23197948   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7953

>>23192221

>>23197936

G7: Anthony Albanese invokes concerns about China’s dominance of global critical minerals supply chains

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 18 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese has invoked concerns about China’s dominance of global critical minerals supply chains in his first speech at the G7 summit, warning that “critical minerals markets are concentrated and vulnerable to manipulation”.

 

Speaking to G7 leaders in the Canadian Rockies town of Kananaskis, the Prime Minister spruiked Australia’s vast deposits of critical minerals and raised the perverse impacts geopolitical tensions are having on energy security and supply chains.

 

Asked to address the summit by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Mr Albanese said over recent years “we have all felt the impact of conflict, non-market practices and unfair competition”.

 

Mr Albanese did not mention China specifically but Xi Jinping’s Communist regime has overseen a domination of critical minerals supply chains. The US, Australia, Japan, South Korea and other regional allies have been working together to break Beijing’s stranglehold on critical minerals supply chains.

 

“Critical minerals are the new drivers of energy security. Australia is blessed to have some of the largest critical minerals deposits on earth. But we are increasingly finding that critical minerals markets are concentrated and vulnerable to manipulation,” Mr Albanese said.

 

“Producers struggle to remain competitive, and supply chains are affected by export bans and controls.”

 

As the Albanese government progresses deals with the US and other allies to turbocharge Australia’s critical minerals market, Mr Albanese said “energy security underpins our growth and prosperity, and is essential for our economic resilience and national security”.

 

“Whether that is to meet the challenge of climate change and drive the energy transition or to power new technologies that can transform our economy into the future – it is essential to our national interest,” he said.

 

After announcing a critical minerals reserve ahead of the May 3 election, Mr Albanese said his government was focused on developing Australia into a “globally significant producer and supplier of critical minerals”.

 

“Extracting and refining our natural assets to safeguard the resilience of our economy and support the economic security of our partners. Our new Strategic Reserve will allow us to deal with trade and market disruptions while meeting increasing global demand.”

 

“I am pleased that Australia is joining the G7 Critical Minerals Action Plan, which will support secure, diversified critical minerals supply chains. We welcome efforts to level the playing field and establish a stable market that reflects the real costs of delivering high-standard products and trade practices.”

 

Mr Albanese said Australia would work with Indo-Pacific partners on their clean energy transition and ensure regional partners can “build resilient, sustainable energy sectors and unlock trade and investment”.

 

In a second summit intervention, Mr Albanese linked Australia’s critical minerals push to the development of “high tech manufacturing, and advancements in Artificial Intelligence and quantum”.

 

“Australia has made significant investments in quantum technologies – including working with the private sector to develop the first utility-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer. We are building on our strengths in quantum and AI applications, especially in mining, agriculture and medical technology.”

 

“Australia can be a leader in data centres in our region due to our abundant land and renewable energy resources. We are also harnessing new technologies to become a leader in green metals and clean energy.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 2:31 a.m. No.23197953   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23197948

 

2/2

 

Earlier in the day, Mr Albanese committed to enhancing Australia’s security co-operation with Japan and accelerating the finalisation of a free trade agreement with the European Union in his first bilateral meetings at the G7 summit.

 

After Donald Trump ditched the G7 and meetings with world leaders including Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Mr Albanese told Japan Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz he wanted to enhance and accelerate security, economic and trade links with the EU and Japan.

 

Mr Albanese, who will arrive back in Australia on Thursday morning, was due to hold four meetings on his first visit to the official G7 summit site at Kananaskis. The 62-year-old was joined by the leaders of nine other countries invited by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney to participate in summit talks. During the G7 family photo, Mr Albanese hugged Mr Zelensky after both men had meetings with Mr Trump cancelled.

 

In his meeting with Mr Ishiba, Mr Albanese encouraged more investment from Japanese companies, acknowledged the “important and reliable” role Australia plays in supporting Japan’s energy security and declared the relationship as “closer than it has ever been”.

 

Amid a significant ramping-up of joint naval exercises and Japanese military presence in Australia, Mr Ishiba told Mr Albanese that economic and geostrategic pressures were increasing in their complexity.

 

As Australia, Japan, the US and Britain join forces to disrupt Chinese military aggression in the South China Sea, Mr Ishiba said he wanted to take “our special strategic partnership to new heights”.

 

“The international economy is increasing its complexity. At the G7 we have discussed in a very frank and fruitful manner about the state of the international affairs. It is becoming more complex with Ukraine, Middle East and Asia, everything is connected the world,” Mr Ishiba said.

 

“And under such circumstances, I think Japan-Australia coordination really continues to set an example of what a like-minded country’s co-operation is, and going forward together I would like to make sure that free and open Indo-Pacific will be realised.”

 

During brief remarks exchanges with Mr Merz, Mr Albanese thanked him for supporting the “free trade agreement we are trying to get done with the European Union, it’s very important”.

 

In response to Mr Merz offering to do “what we can … to speed it up a little”, Mr Albanese said “we’re very keen on getting it done quickly”.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/g7-anthony-albanese-invokes-concerns-about-chinas-dominance-of-global-critical-minerals-supply-chains/news-story/88a2e94e45d712d57cbb487c1b4cb18c

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 2:43 a.m. No.23197965   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7971 >>2261

>>22968851

>>23087088

>>23163733

Scott Morrison calls for an AUKUS pillar 3 – the space frontier

 

SIMON BENSON - 18 June 2025

 

Scott Morrison, the chief architect of the AUKUS pact has called for the military alliance to be expanded into space under a third pillar that would see Australia take a key role in the geopolitical deterrence in the southern hemisphere.

 

The former Coalition prime minister has declared that space technology would become as critical to western defence architecture as the submarine program and could bring other nations including Japan and NATO into the alliance.

 

With the AUKUS program now under review by the Pentagon, the extension of the program into a third pillar – space technology – would also provide the political incentive Donald Trump needs to put his own stamp on the AUKUS pact which was inked by Mr Morrison and former Democrat President Joe Biden and the UK’s former Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

 

“As the Trump administration examines how to improve AUKUS, there’s another important factor – space,” Mr Morrison says in an opinion piece published in the US paper, The Wall Street Journal.

 

“If our nations are serious about deterrence, then we must prepare for new theatres of geopolitical competition. The global space economy now exceeds $630 billion and is projected to nearly triple in value by 2035. But space is no longer a benign domain.

 

“It is contested, competitive and strategically vital. In March, Commander of US Space Command General Stephen Whiting recently warned Congress, space superiority has become foundational to homeland defence and global deterrence.

 

“Beijing is already operating dual-use, civil-military technology across its space sector, launching manoeuverable satellites, conducting co-orbital rendezvous operations, and testing systems capable of disabling adversary assets, such as its Shenlong spaceplane.

 

“China has also deployed ground-based lasers and high-powered microwaves capable of targeting Western satellites. Russia regularly jams and spoofs satellites and Moscow has tested destructive anti-satellite capabilities.

 

“No American president since John F. Kennedy has shown more commitment to space than President Trump, from backing the Artemis Moon to Mars program to creating the US Space Force and promoting commercial innovation through public-private partnerships and now the Golden Dome. That leadership makes him the natural champion of an Aukus Pillar III that consolidates co-operation across launch systems, satellite architecture, cybersecurity, data integration, and industrial innovation.

 

“Australia brings unique advantages to this effort. We already host U.S. assets like the Space Surveillance Telescope and C-Band radar in Western Australia. We’re also leading the AUKUS allies’ effort to develop Deep Space Advanced Radar Capability, or DARC.

 

“Due to be operational in 2026, DARC will track objects in geosynchronous orbit, which includes some of the most valuable and vulnerable satellite assets.

 

“Our Southern Hemisphere geography gives us lines of sight inaccessible from the north.

 

“Australia is the only Five Eyes nation in the southern half of the planet with the large landmass and secure jurisdiction critical for both passive surveillance and active launch capabilities.”

 

Mr Morrison also said that the Trump administration’s request that allies lift defence spending to above three per cent was not an “unreasonable request”.

 

“AUKUS is a new platform for collective deterrence against an axis of autocratic regimes threatening global and regional security, especially in the Indo-Pacific,” Mr Morrison writes.

 

“The agreement’s first pillar enables Australia’s acquisition of its first nuclear-powered sub fleet. Its second pillar facilitates co-operation on advanced military capabilities, from quantum computing to hypersonic missiles.

 

“The Chinese Communist Party opposed AUKUS vehemently, confirming its strategic value.

 

“(But) AUKUS isn’t like other alliances. There are no free riders. Each nation must bring its own capability, commitment and strategic clarity to the table.

 

“Australia is doing its part.

 

“It is time to take AUKUS into space. Establishing a Pillar III would ensure that space, the ultimate high ground, is secured by free nations, not our enemies. America and Australia have stood shoulder to shoulder on land, at sea, and in the skies. Now we must do the same in orbit.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/scott-morrison-calls-for-an-aukus-pillar-3-the-space-frontier/news-story/a26e47e4e92731442657c35187d237b3

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 2:48 a.m. No.23197971   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7972 >>2261

>>23197965

How Donald Trump can launch AUKUS into space

 

Scott Morrison - 18 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Time has borne out what I said to President Trump on the White House South Lawn in September 2019: While Australia may look to the US as a vital ally, we will never leave it to America alone to deal with security issues.

 

In that spirit, in early 2020 as prime minister I assigned a small team to engage Washington about the possibility of Australia acquiring nuclear-powered submarine technology. Two years later the AUKUS agreement among Australia, the UK and the US was born, amid bipartisan support in all three nations. Now, it’s time for AUKUS to grow, and Mr Trump is the right person for the job.

 

AUKUS is a platform for collective deterrence against an axis of autocratic regimes threatening global and regional security, especially in the Indo-Pacific. The agreement’s first pillar enables Australia’s acquisition of its first nuclear-powered sub fleet. Its second pillar facilitates cooperation on advanced military capabilities, from quantum computing to hypersonic missiles. The Chinese Communist Party opposed AUKUS vehemently — confirming its strategic value.

 

AUKUS isn’t like other alliances. There are no free riders. Each nation must bring its own capability, commitment and strategic clarity to the table.

 

Australia is doing its part. Under Pillar I, by 2029 we will have invested up to $3billion directly into the American defence industrial base to increase nuclear submarine production capacity. No other US ally can make that claim. We are building our own fleet of SSN-Aukus submarines with the UK and upgrading infrastructure in Western Australia to support, service, and operate American, UK, and Australian submarines from our western coast.

 

Some observers reacted to the Pentagon’s current review of AUKUS as if it spells the alliance’s doom. But a review – which isn’t unusual for an incoming administration – is a chance to refocus and recalibrate.

 

The review is motivated by the shortfall of US nuclear-submarine production. The current output of Virginia-class submarines is about 1.3 a year, below the 2.33 needed to meet both Aukus and American naval commitments. This threatens the timeline for Australia to acquire its first boats from the US and ultimately undermines deterrence. Mr Trump’s commitment to fixing this shortfall is welcome and essential.

 

America is also calling on Australia to lift its defence spending to above 3% of gross domestic product. That isn’t an unreasonable request. The US can’t be expected to carry the world’s security burden in isolation, and Washington has been right to push for similar commitments from allies in and outside the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.

 

Australia stood with America in every major conflict for over a century, even when others turned their backs. Our interests and loyalties are strongly aligned. A stable Indo-Pacific is critical to Australia’s security and prosperity. That includes protecting the status quo in Taiwan, freedom of navigation, and the rule of law. Washington can rely on us to turn up when it counts.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 2:49 a.m. No.23197972   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23197971

 

2/2

 

As the Trump administration examines how to improve AUKUS, there’s another important factor — space. If our nations are serious about deterrence, then we must prepare for new theatres of geopolitical competition. The global space economy now exceeds $630 billion and is projected to nearly triple in value by 2035. But space is no longer a benign domain. It is contested, competitive and strategically vital. As General Stephen Whiting, commander of US Space Command, warned Congress, space superiority has become foundational to homeland defence and global deterrence.

 

Beijing is already operating dual-use civil-military technology across its space sector—launching maneuverable satellites, conducting co-orbital rendezvous operations, and testing systems capable of disabling adversary assets, such as its Shenlong spaceplane. China has also deployed ground-based lasers and high-powered microwaves capable of targeting Western satellites. Russia regularly jams satellite communications and spoofs GPS, and Moscow has tested destructive antisatellite capabilities.

 

No American president since John F. Kennedy has shown more commitment to space than Mr Trump, from backing the Artemis Moon to Mars program to creating the US Space Force and promoting commercial innovation through public-private partnerships and now the Golden Dome. That leadership makes him the natural champion of an AUKUS Pillar III that consolidates cooperation across launch systems, satellite architecture, cybersecurity, data integration and industrial innovation.

 

This would enable better coordination of allied space policies and create shared standards across defense and commercial systems. It should also provide a platform for integrating non-Aukus allies such as Japan and NATO members into the same architecture. That would make clear that the allies’ space systems are resilient, interconnected and can’t be targeted in isolation.

 

Australia brings unique advantages to this effort. We already host US assets like the Space Surveillance Telescope and C-Band radar in Western Australia. We’re also leading the AUKUS allies’ effort to develop Deep Space Advanced Radar Capability, or DARC. Due to be operational in 2026, DARC will track objects in geosynchronous orbit, which includes some of the most valuable and vulnerable satellite assets.

 

Our Southern Hemisphere geography gives us lines of sight inaccessible from the north. Australia is the only Five Eyes nation in the southern half of the planet with the large landmass and secure jurisdiction critical for both passive surveillance of space and active launch capabilities.

 

Our private space sector is also already working to establish new sovereign launch capabilities. I’m proud to be part of Space Centre Australia’s initiative to establish the Atakani Space Port near Weipa in northern Queensland. At a latitude of only 12 degrees south, it will be the closest equatorial launch site in a secure allied jurisdiction, superior in location to Florida’s Cape Canaveral or Texas’s Boca Chica. For polar orbits, Australia also has Whalers Way in southern Australia. Both launch corridors provide secure and commercially viable solutions for allied and dual-use payloads. These are the launchpads of deterrence in the space age.

 

Establishing a Pillar III would ensure that space, the ultimate high ground, is secured by free nations, not our enemies. America and Australia have stood shoulder to shoulder on land, at sea and in the skies. Now we must do the same in orbit.

 

Scott Morrison served as Australia’s prime minister from 2018-22 and is vice-chairman of American Global Strategies.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/how-donald-trump-can-launch-aukus-into-space/news-story/20ca44e64a6dc691380fd1333fdd80b8

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 3 a.m. No.23197979   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7981 >>2228

>>23076633

Ghost Bat missile trial looms amid growing foreign interest

 

BEN PACKHAM - 17 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Boeing Australia’s MQ-28A Ghost Bat drone will be trialled as an armed platform later this year in a major leap forward for the program, as the government ramps up efforts to acquire lethal uncrewed aircraft.

 

The developmental drone will test-fire an air-to-air missile after a successful trial last week in which two of the aircraft were operated simultaneously from an RAAF jet.

 

The government, which has poured $1bn of taxpayers’ funds into the aircraft, had deferred plans to arm the Ghost Bat, intending to develop it initially for surveillance and electronic warfare missions.

 

But there is growing confidence in the drone after the latest test at South Australia’s top-secret Woomera range, prompting the fast-tracking of the missile trial.

 

“There will be an armed trial later this year,” Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said. “Boeing is working on plans that will involve an air-to-air weapons test.”

 

The drone will fire a US-made AMRAAM missile, which the RAAF uses on its F-35s and F/A-18 Super Hornets.

 

Mr Conroy declined to say when the Ghost Bat was expected to enter service but said the program was running four months ahead of schedule and indicated it was in line for further funding when its budget was expended by the end of the year.

 

He said the drone was one of the top five capabilities the government was marketing to foreign militaries, and was already attracting strong interest from potential overseas buyers.

 

“It’s one of the most advanced collaborative combat aircraft in the world,” Mr Conroy said.

 

The endorsement follows Boeing’s failure to gain entry into the US’s Collaborative Combat Aircraft program to acquire hundreds of “loyal wingman”-style drones to operate with crewed fighter jets, prompting fears the Ghost Bat could become an expensive “orphan” capability.

 

The US Air Force selected tech disrupter Anduril and longtime drone-maker General Atomics as its top candidates for manufacturing and testing under the CAA program.

 

But Mr Conroy said the government was hopeful the Ghost Bat could still gain entry to the US program.

 

The two Ghost Bats involved in last week’s trial were operated from an E-7A Wedgetail – an airborne early warning and control aircraft based on a Boeing 737 airframe.

 

Boeing defence, space and security chief executive Steve Parker said the demonstration was a “first of its kind” with a collaborative combat aircraft.

 

He told reporters at the Paris Air Show that the company had been honing its machine learning, autonomy and artificial intelligence in the Ghost Bat’s development, delivering “the most advanced CCA” available.

 

“We are seeing a lot of interest from around the globe, back into the US, as well as (in) Europe,” Mr Parker said.

 

Further testing will see the drones operated from Super Hornets and F-35s. The Ghost Bat received $400m from the Albanese government in February 2024 to deliver three new prototype aircraft by the end of this year, after $600m in earlier funding.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 3 a.m. No.23197981   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23197979

 

2/2

 

The government is under pressure to accelerate the acquisition of armed drones given developments in Ukraine and the Middle East, where uncrewed aircraft have been used to great effect.

 

Defence last year acquired an undisclosed number of US-made Switchblade “loitering munition”-style drones, and is supporting the development of new $5000 drones made from domestically sourced parts and those from friendly countries.

 

But the ADF has no cheap and lethal “first-person view” drones controlled by optical fibre links, which have been widely used in Ukraine because they cannot be electronically jammed.

 

Meanwhile, Mr Conroy declared the government’s upcoming selection of a new general purpose frigate design would be made on the merits of the ship and the bidders’ ability to get it into service quickly, rather than for geopolitical reasons.

 

“We’re going to choose the frigate that offers the best capability for the Royal Australian Navy, on the schedule that we’ve set in stone, that offers value for money for the commonwealth, as well as factors like the ability to transfer production to Australia and opportunities for the Australian supply chain in producing them here,” he said.

 

The statement will be welcomed by Germany’s ThyssenKrupp Marine Systems, which feared it would lose out in the $10bn tender race with Japan’s Mitsubishi Heavy Industries because of Australia’s need to strengthen ties with its key Indo-Pacific partner.

 

Japan is mounting a whole-of-government campaign to win the contract, leveraging its “quasi alliance” with Australia and the need for closer defence co-operation in the Indo-Pacific to counter China’s growing military might.

 

Japan’s upgraded Mogami frigate is a newer design than Germany’s Meko-200 and is seen as potentially more capable.

 

Yet Japan’s bid is considered by many to be more risky as it has never exported a warship to a foreign buyer or built one in another country.

 

Defence has been assessing the risks, capabilities and costs of both frigate bids, with a decision on a successful design due by the end of the year.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/successful-ghost-bat-drone-missile-trial-piques-interest-of-foreign-militaries/news-story/7f8b51d24c95760e8329bd758b4ddf49

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 3:33 a.m. No.23198013   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8018 >>2279

>>23032055

Top China military official disappears in latest purge under Xi Jinping amid rising factional politics

 

Bang Xiao - 18 June 2025

 

1/2

 

The disappearance of another high-ranking Chinese military official has demonstrated that no-one is indispensable to President Xi Jinping in achieving his goals.

 

Even those among his closest allies.

 

General He Weidong, China's second-ranking military official and co-vice chairman of the powerful Central Military Commission (CMC), has not been seen in public since March 11.

 

His name was also absent from the official list of attendees at the funeral of his former colleague, Xu Qiliang, who was also a co-vice chairman of the CMC.

 

With silence often treated as confirmation in China's highly choreographed political system, He's ongoing absence confirms his removal from power.

 

His disappearance follows a similar pattern of recent high-profile purges. Former foreign minister Qin Gang and former defence minister Li Shangfu also disappeared from public view before they were removed from their positions.

 

He's dismissal comes after a longstanding personal and professional relationship with Xi.

 

Xi and He both served in the local government of Fujian province in the 1990s and 2000s, with He promoted to "full general" — the highest military rank — in 2017 and eventually co-vice chairman in 2022.

 

It's a position that granted him more than just command of the military. It also made him a member of the elite Politburo — the top decision-making body of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).

 

His sudden fall just three years into the role underscores the intensity of internal instability within the CCP.

 

Despite projecting a unified public image, the highest level of China's political system is a pressure cooker of competing ambitions, ideological divides, and factional loyalties.

 

Xi's leadership has been marked by a relentless consolidation of power and a sweeping anti-corruption campaign, but the frequent removal of his own appointees suggests cracks in the system he has built.

 

Xi's gamble amid political uncertainty

 

The timing of He's disappearance could be politically charged.

 

In August, the 4th Plenary Session of the 20th Central Committee is scheduled to take place — a key meeting where leadership direction is often recalibrated behind closed doors.

 

It is precisely during such sensitive periods that purges are most common, either as a pre-emptive strike or a signal of discipline.

 

The disappearance of He also exposes the fragility in China's defence system at a time when Beijing is expanding its military footprint and increasing its defence budget.

 

The People's Liberation Army (PLA) has been conducting joint air and naval exercises in the South China Sea, a move likely aimed at both foreign and domestic audiences.

 

On one hand, the drills serve as a warning to neighbouring countries and the United States.

 

On the other, they reinforce the narrative of a combat-ready PLA under Xi's direct control.

 

Military strength and political authority go hand in hand in China, and Xi's tightening grip on the armed forces is as much about addressing internal rot as external deterrence.

 

Purges at such moments are rarely about a single person.

 

Since 2023, at least three senior generals have been removed from their posts — including two defence ministers hand-picked by Xi — as part of a broader campaign targeting entrenched corruption and disloyalty within the ranks.

 

But in He's case, the removal may have been less about personal wrongdoing and more about managing factional rivalry and consolidating political control.

 

While no-one knows exactly why He was purged, his downfall serves as a warning that even those within Xi's own circle are not immune.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 18, 2025, 3:36 a.m. No.23198018   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23198013

 

2/2

 

Factional dynamics within the party

 

China's Communist Party may be a one-party state, but it is far from monolithic.

 

Since the Mao era, internal factions have formed around shared regional ties, ideological leanings, and personal loyalties.

 

Under Xi, many of the traditional groupings — such as the Youth League faction and the "princelings" (descendants of senior CCP members) — have weakened, but factionalism has not disappeared. Instead, it has adapted.

 

He, for instance, was associated with the so-called "Fujian clique", a group of military officials who served in the province of the same name when Xi was governor.

 

That connection, however, did not protect him.

 

Xi's promotions have not been driven solely by factional alignment, but by an emphasis on military preparedness and loyalty.

 

However, when factions grow too influential or individuals are perceived as potential threats — even loyal ones — they may be sidelined or purged by Xi to protect the party's image and his authority.

 

In that sense, purges are not just about corruption or disloyalty, but also about managing internal rivalries and reinforcing Xi's dominance.

 

Still, constant purging fosters distrust, undermines morale, and narrows the pool of reliable successors.

 

Who comes after Xi?

 

At the heart of all these manoeuvres lies a deeper question: who will succeed Xi?

 

Officially, no heir apparent has been named.

 

Laying out a succession plan in China's political system is like walking on eggshells — too much clarity can be just as dangerous as none at all.

 

The absence of a clear plan has fuelled factional rivalry, as competing blocs within the party manoeuvre to position their own candidate for future leadership.

 

But naming a successor too early is risky — once identified, that person can quickly become a political target for rival factions looking to block their rise.

 

Xi's real enemy may not be rival factions but the one-party system he leads.

 

As long as the CCP remains opaque and centralised, leadership transitions will always be fraught with uncertainty.

 

In such an environment, political rivals may not be able to directly challenge Xi, but they can target his allies and undermine his influence from the inside.

 

The disappearance of He is unlikely to be the last.

 

As elite competition intensifies ahead of future leadership changes, more purges are likely.

 

Xi may appear unassailable, but the hollowing out of his inner circle reveals the fragility of his position.

 

After all, power in China is centralised, but it is also precarious.

 

Ultimately, the downfall of a top general is not just a story about one man.

 

It is a window into the inner workings of a regime that has long prized loyalty over stability — and now relies increasingly on purges in place of transparency.

 

The costs of that strategy may not be fully visible yet. But the silence is.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-18/chinese-president-xi-jinping-purges-ally-what-does-it-mean/105426566

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 19, 2025, 2:16 a.m. No.23203238   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3239 >>2229

>>23192221

>>23197936

Anthony Albanese seeks window for Trump sit-down

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 18 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese has left the door open for a last-minute dash to The Hague next week as he continues to seek his first face-to-face meeting with Donald Trump at the NATO leaders’ summit after the US President ditched their G7 talks.

 

The Prime Minister was blindsided on Tuesday when the President cancelled their meeting and departed the G7 early following an escalation of the Israel-Iran war, forcing Mr Albanese to make his long-awaited pitch on the need for the US to lift its tariffs on Australian products to Mr Trump’s economic officials instead.

 

After sitting down with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett, and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday (AEST), Mr Albanese revealed he had not heard from Mr Trump directly since the cancellation of their meeting, despite other leaders such as Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum having received a call from the President.

 

While failing to make ­material progress with the US on issues surrounding AUKUS and tariffs, Mr Albanese was able to make headway on a security and defence partnership with the ­European Union, which had come as a surprise to the Labor leader when first raised with him in Rome earlier this year.

 

Just 24 hours after Mr Albanese said he expected Defence Minister Richard Marles would attend the upcoming NATO summit in the Netherlands, the 62-year-old said he was now considering attending the two-day NATO heads of state and government meeting mid-next week, rather than wait for a meeting with Mr Trump at the UN leaders’ summit in New York, scheduled in September.

 

Mr Albanese – who is under pressure from the Coalition for being unable to progress his relationship with Mr Trump and secure wins on tariff exemptions and the long-term ­future of the $368bn AUKUS deal – said he had had discussions with a range of people in recent days including NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte.

 

The Australian understands that several meeting scenarios are being explored and that Mr Albanese would not attend the NATO summit if there was no chance of a meeting. Should Mr Albanese attend NATO, the Labor leader would be exposed to the debate on what countries should be spending on defence, relative to GDP, with Australia having resisted calls from the US so far to lift spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

 

As White House officials sought to fill the void Mr Trump left at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Mr Albanese and US ambassador Kevin Rudd met for 20 minutes with Mr Greer and Mr Hassett, who is the US President’s principal economic adviser. The group held another 20-minute meeting that included Mr Bessent.

 

The meetings, not open to the media and initially kept under wraps, allowed Mr Albanese to put forward the case for tariff exemptions and plans to unlock Australia’s vast critical minerals and rare earths reserves in partnership with the US. Mr Albanese said he made the point clearly to the economic officials that the US-Australia free trade agreement had delivered for both countries, with the US enjoying a trade surplus over more than two decades.

 

“It was a real opportunity to meet three of the President’s senior economic team together,” he said. “We’ll continue to engage constructively.”

 

Concerns about the Pentagon’s snap 30-day review into the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal and US calls for Australia to lift its defence spending were not raised with Mr Trump’s economic officials, Mr Albanese said.

 

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in a meeting with his Australian counterpart, told Mr Albanese they would take co-_operation on defence, security and the AUKUS deal to “another level”. A day after landing a major trade deal with Mr Trump and winning assurances from him on the AUKUS pact, Sir Keir said the bilateral relationship between Australia and the UK “could not be stronger in my view”.

 

“We’ve both taken it on ourselves to take it to another level when it comes to defence and security, to our work on AUKUS, but also on issues like energy and the global issues that matter,” Sir Keir said. “We think alike, we work alike and we have a shared agendas to work together.”

 

Mr Albanese said of the UK that there was “no relationship more important than the one between our two great nations”.

 

He said the defence relationship and AUKUS partnership with Britain were “so important”.

 

“I travelled up to Barrow (in the UK) and saw first-hand what is happening there (with the nuclear submarines),” Mr Albanese said.

 

He praised Sir Keir for his government’s leadership on supporting Ukraine in its war with Russia.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 19, 2025, 2:18 a.m. No.23203239   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23203238

 

2/2

 

After his meeting with Mr Trump was cancelled, Mr Albanese focused his four bilateral meetings at the G7 on strengthening security and trade ties with Europe, Britain, Germany and Japan.

 

After meeting European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen and European Council president Antonio Costa, Mr Albanese said he had authorised ministerial discussions on a non-binding security and defence _partnership, which has attracted some criticism over its potential to distract Canberra from the Indo-Pacific. Mr Albanese has instructed Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Mr Marles to commence negotiations on a security partnership with the EU that will not be considered a treaty nor include military-deployment obligations.

 

Ms von der Leyen, who is expected to travel to Australia by ­August, endorsed the resumption of formal negotiations to finalise an Australia-EU free trade agreement. “In a time of rising tensions and strategic competition, trusted partners must stand together,” Ms von der Leyen said.

 

After new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz offered to do what he could to “speed” up the FTA process, Mr Albanese told him “we’re very keen on getting it done quickly”.

 

Making his first appearance on the final day of the G7 summit at the Pomeroy Kananaskis Mountain Lodge, Mr Albanese took part in a photo with the remaining G7 leaders and those invited by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney including Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky and ­Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who also had a scheduled meeting with Mr Trump cancelled.

 

Mr Albanese, who will arrive back in Australia on Thursday morning, hugged Mr Zelensky and greeted other G7 leaders.

 

Amid a significant ramping up of joint naval exercises and Japanese military presence in Australia, Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told Mr Albanese that economic and geostrategic pressures were increasing in their complexity.

 

As Australia, Japan, the US and Britain join forces to disrupt Chinese military aggression in the South China Sea, Mr Ishiba said he wanted to take “our special strategic partnership to new heights”.

 

“It is becoming more complex with Ukraine, Middle East and Asia – everything is connected, the world,” Mr Ishiba said. “Under such circumstances, I think Japan-Australia co-ordination really _continues to set an example of what a like-minded country’s co-operation is, and going forward together I would like to make sure that free and open Indo-Pacific will be realised.”

 

Mr Albanese earlier invoked concerns about China’s dominance of global critical minerals supply chains in his first speech at the G7 summit, warning critical minerals markets were “concentrated and vulnerable to manipulation”. He spruiked Australia’s vast deposits of critical minerals and raised the impacts geopolitical tensions were having on energy security and supply chains.

 

Asked to address the summit by Mr Carney, Mr Albanese said that over recent years “we have all felt the impact of conflict, non-market practices and unfair competition”.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-seeks-window-for-trump-sitdown/news-story/d879c3852e7efd4e36b6a7a4c0f9d51d

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 19, 2025, 2:31 a.m. No.23203256   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2159

>>23099049

>>23152313

>>23152367

Kunafa chef charged for chanting ‘All Zionists are terrorists’ at pro-Palestinian rallies

 

MOHAMMAD ALFARES - 18 June 2025

 

Victoria Police will argue in court that chanting “all Zionists are terrorists” in public is anti-Semitic and effectively brands the majority of Jewish Australians as such, in a major legal test of hate speech laws targeting pro-Palestinian activists.

 

Summary of statement documents obtained by The Australian reveal Victoria Police deemed the controversial chant “anti-Semitic” and considered the use of it as an “affront” to the Jewish community while pressing charges against activists.

 

The documents concern charging kunafa chef Jad Awwad Abu Alsendyan under Section 17(1) of the state’s Summary Offences Act – which prohibits profane, indecent or obscene language – for allegedly saying “all Zionists are terrorists” at pro-Palestinian rallies.

 

If proven, the crime is punishable with two months’ prison for the first ­offence, three months for the second, and six months for three or more.

 

Mr Alsendyan, who owns the popular Kunafeh House food truck, is facing two charges.

 

The 48-year-old activist is widely regarded in Melbourne’s Middle Eastern community for making Nablus-style kunafa (Palestinian dessert).

 

Police allege Mr Alsendyan led the chant during the Protest Until Ceasefire rally in Melbourne’s CBD on April 6, using a megaphone to amplify the slogan. Detectives say they relied on footage shared by pro-Palestinian groups online to identify him and other participants.

 

“During the march, the accused was walking at the head of the march with a megaphone,” the informant’s summary states.

 

“The accused chanted ‘all Zionists are terrorists’ a total of three times, encouraging the protest group to chant in unison by saying ‘Louder!’

 

“The chant ‘all Zionists are terrorists’ was deemed to be anti-Semitic and offensive language as it categorises the majority of the Australian Jewish community as terrorists, seen as an affront to that community.”

 

Speaking to Mr Alsendyan, detectives asked him how he would define the chant.

 

“Everyone in the protest, they chant. So all the thousands of people they chant,” he said.

 

“We didn’t say anything bad. We didn’t attack any person or any religion or any country.”

 

The conflation between Zionism and anti-Semitism has been a flashpoint in public discourse since October 2023, complicating debates around the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and freedom of speech in Australia.

 

Pro-Palestinian supporters argue that Zionism is a settler-colonial ideology that led to the displacement of Palestinians in 1948 (the Nakba). They see it as the driving force behind the ­establishment of Israel on land they consider historically Palestinian. But mainstream Jewish organisations in Australia argue that activists had been hiding ­behind the “Zionist” euphemism to vilify Jews.

 

Mr Alsendyan told The Australian he planned on camping outside the Melbourne Magistrates Court until his case was heard later this month.

 

Rule of Law Institute of Australia vice-president Chris Merritt said the decision by police to use the Summary Offences Act raised the question of why it was not used earlier.

 

“This act has been on the statute books since 1966 and imposes jail time for public threats, abuse and insults – conduct that is now a regular occurrence on the streets of Melbourne,” Mr Merritt said.

 

“It has a much broader reach than Victoria’s recently enacted anti-vilification law, which appears incapable of protecting ­Zionists from vilification.

 

“But Zionism, or support for the Jewish homeland, is a political belief that is not determined by race or religion. And vilification on the basis of political ­belief is not one of the new law’s protected attributes.”

 

He said while the Summary Offences Act carried lesser penalties, it was not restricted by definitions based on race, religion or other specific characteristics.

 

It is understood a total of five activists have been charged by Victoria Police for using the chant.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/kunafa-chef-charged-for-chanting-all-zionists-are-terrorists-at-propalestinian-rallies/news-story/0abef29f892f6e5db8c4477effb67c30

 

https://www.instagram.com/kunafehhouse/

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 19, 2025, 2:43 a.m. No.23203273   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3278 >>2698 >>4374 >>2159

>>23174845

>>23182420

>>23192221

Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi calls on Anthony Albanese to condemn Israel, issues warning to Donald Trump

 

Paul Johnson - 18 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Iran's ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, has called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to condemn Israel's strikes on the Middle Eastern nation and denied that the Islamic Republic is working on a nuclear weapons program.

 

Mr Sadeghi made the comments to 7.30 during a wide-ranging interview where he also refused to recognise Israel's right to exist as a state and warned US President Donald Trump there may be consequences for 80,000 US troops stationed in the Persian Gulf if the US strikes Iranian targets.

 

Mr Sadeghi described Israel's June 13 attack on Iranian targets — that has seen a reported 224 people there killed — as "unprovoked".

 

Since then, there have been a reported 24 casualties in Israel as a result of Iranian retaliatory strikes, with civilians dying on both sides.

 

Mr Sadeghi defended the Iranian response as "its inalienable right to just defensive measures", before he called on Mr Albanese to condemn Israel for the June 13 attack that has pushed the Middle East to the brink of a wider conflict.

 

"You have to have the punishment of the aggressor," Mr Sadeghi told 7.30.

 

"If you let it go unpunished [and] the prime minister of this regime [Benjamin Netanyahu] declared publicly and arrogantly that 'I ordered such an attack against Iran'.

 

"If you just let them go free, it has very bad consequences."

 

Asked by 7.30 host David Speers if that meant "condemnation," Mr Sadeghi responded "exactly".

 

"We ask Australia, as a friendly nation that we are in the good relation with, they have to condemn."

 

Asked if that meant a public condemnation of Israel from the Albanese government, the Iranian ambassador said: "Yes, I ask them."

 

Warning issued to Trump

 

As he asked for Australia to condemn Israel's actions, which began with attacks on Iranian nuclear sites, Mr Sadeghi issued a warning about possible US involvement.

 

Israel's original strikes targeted Iranian nuclear facilities at Natanz, Sifahan, and Fordow, and several scientists involved in nuclear research and development, reflecting Israel's fears about Iran's nuclear program and potential capability to soon produce nuclear weapons.

 

But the Fordow site is deep underground, and it has been suggested that only US bunker-busting bombs could breach it.

 

Mr Trump has so far avoided getting the US directly involved but has called for Iran's "unconditional surrender" and warned Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei that the US will not kill him "for now".

 

"We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding," Mr Trump posted on Truth Social. "He is an easy target, but is safe there — we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now.

 

"But we don't want missiles shot at civilians or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!"

 

Mr Sadeghi told 7.30 that Iran was "fully prepared" to negotiate but warned that US military involvement could lead to a wider conflict.

 

"The Mr Trump … character … he was supposed to be a man of peace, now he's come to man of war," Mr Sadeghi said.

 

"Around 80,000 US personnel are in the Persian Gulf area; they may not be as comfortable as much as now.

 

"The other Islamic nations around … in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq — if Iran would be attacked by US, they wouldn't be silent.

 

"We advise Mr Trump to [not] be dragged into an unwanted war that Netanyahu is going to make. Netanyahu is notorious to put the burden of [his] own unjust war on shoulder of the other players.

 

"I ask Mr Trump to be very careful about that."

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 19, 2025, 2:46 a.m. No.23203278   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23203273

 

2/2

 

Nuclear weapons denial

 

Mr Sadeghi earned himself a diplomatic rebuke from Mr Albanese last year for "antisemitic" and "hateful" comments he made on social media that called for the "wiping out" of Israelis in Palestine by 2027.

 

During his appearance on 7.30, he was repeatedly challenged to acknowledge Israel's right to exist and refused to do so.

 

However, when he was challenged on whether Israel had a right to fear Iran's nuclear capability, Mr Sadeghi maintained the programme was peaceful.

 

That ran against comments made earlier in June by Rafael Grossi, director of the UN's nuclear watchdog, the IAEA.

 

In a statement, Mr Grossi said the IAEA was not "in a position to provide assurance that Iran’s nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful".

 

Mr Sadeghi disputed that was the case and went on to deny Iran was pursuing a nuclear weapons programme.

 

"He (Grossi) came back to Vienna and had a sort of declaration that was not consistent with work cooperation Iran was doing," Mr Sadeghi said.

 

"All the inspection on the Iranian programmes just signifies that Iran's programme has been peaceful and nothing as the initiation with regard to nuclear arms."

 

Asked if that meant that Iran would not pursue the manufacture of nuclear weapons, Mr Sadeghi said the nation would not.

 

"Of course not," he said.

 

"It has been prohibited by our supreme leader."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-18/iranian-ambassador-ahmad-sadeghi-issues-warning-to-united-states/105433262

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCuzbAEPje0

 

https://qresear.ch/?q=Ahmad+Sadeghi

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 19, 2025, 3:18 a.m. No.23203311   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3314 >>2682 >>2691 >>2160

>>23182420

>>23186849

>>23192221

Armoured cars, ferries: How Australians are fleeing the Middle East

 

Olivia Ireland - June 19, 2025

 

1/2

 

Australians are resorting to chartering armoured cars and ferries to flee Israel, or sheltering in place in Iran, as Australia’s embassies scramble to organise evacuations in a region where flights are not operating and conflict is escalating.

 

Almost 3000 Australians have registered to be evacuated out of Israel and Iran, representing a near doubling in the number of people seeking to flee for each day the conflict has continued, and some have accused the government’s response of being “delinquent”.

 

At least two buses have already left Israel for Jordan with Australians on board, including one organised by insurers and the other by the government, but others are paying private companies for evacuation via armoured car or ferries to Cyprus.

 

Wong told ABC News Breakfast on Thursday the missile strikes between Israel and Iran made the situation difficult because they made it impossible to conduct evacuation flights.

 

“It’s a very, very difficult situation on the ground at the moment,” Wong said. “Obviously, there are more opportunities [to evacuate people] in relation to Israel. We took the opportunity to get a small group out across by land crossing yesterday. And we’ll seek to continue that … Iran is a very complicated situation, a very risky situation.”

 

Airspace over the region has been closed since June 13, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched dozens of missile attacks on Iranian targets with the aim of ending the expansion of its nuclear weapons development program. Iran has since retaliated.

 

Governments’ struggles to evacuate citizens have spurred demand for private exit routes. Earlier this week tour groups of Jewish Australians co-ordinated to join a ferry to evacuate from Haifa to Cyprus.

 

US medical and security response company Global Rescue also reported a spike in requests from people who would have to pay thousands for their rescue.

 

The company’s associate director Harding Bush said one Australian in Israel was driven by private security guards in an armoured SUV to the country’s eastern border where a Jordanian team picked him up and took him to the airport.

 

Evacuations of this kind were executed all week from Israel, Bush said, as well as some from Iran that proved to be more difficult.

 

“As soon as airspace shuts, while governments are still figuring out how to organise group evacuations, we tend to get stranded travellers searching us on the internet, because there’s no other way to get out,” he said.

 

David Morris, a Jewish Australian executive from Sydney, is one of the many stuck in Jerusalem along with his wife since the attacks, spending hours each night in their hotel’s safe room.

 

Morris said he was frustrated by the lack of information from DFAT, which has told Australians to make their own assessments about the safety of leaving Israel.

 

“We can’t make our own assessments because we have no information,” he said. “I’m sitting in the hotel room and I’m going to use social media to make an assessment?”

 

On Tuesday, Morris received an email from the department asking if he wanted to make a land crossing to Jordan via a private bus.

 

The email said “you will be responsible for your onward travel after arrival in Jordan”.

 

Despite responding “yes”, Morris said he received no reply.

 

“This is really unacceptable and the Australian government is delinquent in the way they are managing this situation,” Morris said, questioning why there was not more proactive support available to evacuate citizens once they reach Jordan.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 19, 2025, 3:22 a.m. No.23203314   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23203311

 

2/2

 

According to government travel advice, Australians should make their own safety assessments before travelling by land from Israel into neighbouring countries. “Transport routes may be disrupted. Roads may be crowded and exposed to security risks such as military action, rocket attacks and terrorism, as may border crossings,” the Smart Traveller website says.

 

National security expert John Blaxland said it was likely Australians were shuttled out through Jordan and into Egypt, where airspace was open.

 

“There’s clear routes through Egypt that you can transit and the airports that are working are through Egypt,” he said.

 

Israel’s borders with Lebanon and Syria in the north, which traverse heavily militarised areas, are unlikely to be used for evacuating Australians.

 

The director of AUSIRAN, a group that advocates against Iranian authorities’ repression, Rana Dadpour said many of her friends and family stuck in Tehran cannot access internet, let alone evacuate.

 

“Since 14 hours ago, all internet has been cut off so we’ve lost contact with everyone in Iran,” Dadpour said. “The situation is very scary right now because the regime began arresting people for sharing concerns for their lack of safety.”

 

Wong said the closure of airspace complicates the government’s ability to assist people, but she believed more Australians would want to leave in coming days and weeks.

 

“Those numbers, I anticipate will continue to climb. They’ve certainly increased over the last few days in Iran, the situation is obviously very challenging and our advice is to leave, if safe to do so, otherwise, to shelter,” she said.

 

Sydney mother Sandra Steinberg said she was “incredibly angry” with DFAT, after her 30-year-old son became stuck in Tel Aviv.

 

“People are dying on both sides and the government has washed their hands completely,” Steinberg, who is Jewish, told this masthead. “People are feeling abandoned by the government, they feel like the government doesn’t care.”

 

She said her son was in Israel for a Pride festival, staying in an AirBnb without a reinforced safe room, but had left on Wednesday on a bus for neighbouring Jordan, where he was waiting for a flight home on Thursday evening.

 

“My son’s insurance company organised [the bus], why couldn’t the government?” Steinberg asked.

 

The crisis in the Middle East forced US President Donald Trump to cut short his attendance at the G7 in Canada, resulting in a first face-to-face meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese being cancelled.

 

Senior American officials are reportedly preparing for the possibility of a strike on Iran in coming days, a sign that Washington is assembling the infrastructure to enter a conflict with Tehran.

 

Trump told reporters at the White House on Wednesday he has “ideas as to what to do” and that he prefers to make the “final decision one second before it’s due” because the situation in the Middle East is fluid.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/australians-shuttled-out-of-israel-overland-as-thousands-register-for-evacuation-20250619-p5m8oi.html

 

https://www.smartraveller.gov.au/news-and-updates/conflict-middle-east

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 1:23 a.m. No.23212682   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2684 >>2691 >>2160

>>23186849

>>23203311

Australian embassy staff in Tehran rushed out of Iran amid fears of bigger conflict in the Middle East

 

Stephen Dziedzic - 20 June 2025

 

1/2

 

The federal government has suspended its embassy in Iran and rushed out Australian diplomats in Tehran across the border into Azerbaijan as fears of a major war in the Middle East continue to mount.

 

It is also ramping up its warnings to Australians in Iran, urging them to make their own way out of the country by road if they can safely do so.

 

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the government had directed the departure of all Australian officials and dependents and suspended operations at its embassy in Tehran based on advice about "the deteriorating security environment in Iran".

 

She warned the situation was volatile.

 

"The government has a responsibility to ensure the safety of our staff … we do not have to cast our minds back too far in history to understand the risk to foreign officials in Iran in times of unrest," Senator Wong said.

 

The ABC has been told that Australian diplomats — along with family members — spent almost 24 hours travelling by car to get out of the country as Israel and Iran continue to trade strikes, and as President Donald Trump contemplates US military action against Tehran.

 

At least some of those Tehran-based diplomats are expected to stay in place near the Iran-Azerbaijan border as they work to evacuate more Australians from Iran.

 

The minister said she was conscious that the embassy's closure would add to difficulties for Australians seeking to leave the country, but said staff continued to work on contingency plans for when Iran's airspace reopened.

 

"We are really conscious it is difficult. I wish it were not so, I wish that we had more capacity to assist, but the difficult reality is the situation on the ground is extremely unstable," Senator Wong said.

 

Foreign embassies have been repeatedly targeted before during crises in Iran, most famously during the 1979 Revolution when US diplomats were taken hostage.

 

In 2006, paramilitary groups attacked the Danish embassy in Tehran to protest cartoons of Prophet Mohammad in a Danish newspaper, while Azerbaijan's embassy was attacked in January this year.

 

Senator Wong hoped the embassy would be able to reopen.

 

More urgent warnings for Australians

 

The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) is also now issuing more urgent warnings to Australians in Iran, saying that it "urge[s] Australians who want to leave Iran to do so now, if it is safe".

 

"Australians in Iran who are unable to leave, or do not wish to leave, are advised to shelter in place," it said.

 

Just over 2,000 Australian citizens, permanent residents and their immediate family members have now registered with the federal government to say they want to leave Iran.

 

The travel advice tells Australians they can potentially leave by road to Türkiye, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, but also warns roads "may be crowded and exposed to security risks such as military action, rocket attacks and terrorism".

 

"You should consider the risks carefully before attempting to leave by any route and you should make your own assessment whether it's safe for you to travel in current circumstances," it said.

 

"If you are not confident in the safety and reliability of any departure option, shelter in place and follow the advice of local authorities."

 

The advice also said Australians would need a visa to cross most of those borders, with the exception of Armenia.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 1:25 a.m. No.23212684   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23212682

 

2/2

 

One DFAT official — who is not based in Iran — told the ABC that the Tehran-based diplomats should have been evacuated from the country earlier and that the government and senior DFAT management in Canberra had been too slow to grant their request to leave.

 

The US State Department directed all non-essential personnel at its embassy in Iraq to leave the country on Wednesday last week, just before Israel's initial strike on Iran's nuclear facilities.

 

A separate government source defended DFAT's response, saying it had to juggle a host of competing imperatives in a very fluid and uncertain environment.

 

Meanwhile, a spokesperson for the US Department of State said Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Penny Wong had a call where they agreed to "continue to work together closely to commit to a path of peace and ensure that Iran never develops a nuclear weapon".

 

It came as the federal government and DFAT officials intensified efforts to get more Australians out of Israel, as well as Iran.

 

The government has been preparing to send in either Australian Defence Force or chartered flights out of the region for stranded Australians, but said it was impossible to take that step right now with airspace closed and as missiles continue to fly.

 

Flights to major international airports in both Israel and Iran remain suspended, while Iraq and Jordan have also suspended many flights in the midst of the conflict.

 

The government has already organised buses to help a small number of Australians, believed to measure in the dozens, to leave Israel.

 

Senator Wong said on Thursday that the government had "taken the opportunity to get a small group of Australians out of Israel through a land border crossing" on Wednesday, and was "seeking to try and do more of that over the next 24 hours".

 

Some other Australians have also been turning to private transport companies to get out of Israel.

 

Many European countries have already repatriated hundreds of citizens from Israel, largely by bus to Egypt and Jordan, where they have been able to take flights back home.

 

US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee has also said their embassy was "working on evacuation flights and cruise ship departures" for "American citizens wanting to leave Israel".

 

While organising evacuations from Iran is more complicated, China has said that it has now assisted more than 1,600 of its citizens to leave the country.

 

Beijing said on Thursday its "embassies and consulates will continue to make every effort to assist in the safe transfer and evacuation of Chinese citizens".

 

Around 1,000 Pakistanis have also fled Iran so far, along with at least 110 Indian students.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-20/australian-diplomats-rushed-out-of-iran-amid-israeli-bombardment/105439516

 

https://crisis.dfat.gov.au/

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 1:31 a.m. No.23212691   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2698 >>8389 >>2160

>>23186849

>>23203311

>>23212682

Albanese government to evacuate Australians stranded in the Middle East amid Iran-Israel war

 

BEN PACKHAM and SARAH ISON - 20 June 2025

 

The Albanese government has shuttered the nation’s embassy in Iran and launched a major operation to evacuate Australian citizens from the Middle East, as US President Donald Trump granted Tehran a two-week window to abandon its nuclear program ­before he decides whether to launch US strikes on the country.

 

Mr Trump said he believed there was a “substantial chance of negotiations” with Tehran, sparking a fresh European push for a diplomatic solution to the conflict in talks with Iran’s foreign minister in Switzerland.

 

The evacuation mission, announced amid ongoing strikes between Israel and Iran on Friday AEST, includes the deployment of two RAAF passenger airlifters together with air force and army personnel and the relocation of consular staff to Azerbaijan to support Australians fleeing across the border from Iran.

 

More than 2000 Australians and their family members are seeking help to leave Iran, while another 1200 have sought evacuation from Israel.

 

Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the mission, dubbed Operation Beech, was currently unable to airlift Australians from either country but the government was preparing plans for the reopening of the region’s airspace.

 

She said the decision to order the evacuation of Australian diplomats from Tehran was not taken lightly and the nation’s ­ambassador, Ian McConville, would remain in the region to support the government’s response to the unfolding crisis.

 

“It is a decision based on the deteriorating security environment in Iran; a decision I directed after consultation with the Prime Minister and the Deputy Prime Minister,” Senator Wong said.

 

“We urge Australians who are able to leave Iran to do so now if it is safe. Those who are not able to do so or who do not wish to leave are advised to shelter in place.”

 

She revealed she had a phone call overnight on Thursday with her US counterpart Marco Rubio, who said Mr Trump’s two-week window for Iran had opened the way for “de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy”.

 

In a statement read by White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, the President said: “Based on the fact that there’s a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.”

 

The pause followed days of escalating rhetoric by Mr Trump, who had warned the US was preparing for a “total and complete victory” unless Tehran agreed to an unconditional surrender.

 

The President has been weighing the use of US “bunker buster” bombs to destroy Iran’s underground Fordow uranium-enrichment facility as the US masses air and naval power in the Middle East to support potential combat operations and protect US personnel in the region.

 

Late on Friday AEST, the White House was waiting on the results of talks between the British, French, German and EU foreign ministers, and their Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi.

 

UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy – who met with Mr Rubio in the White House on Thursday to discuss the unfolding situation – said it was time to bring the conflict to an end.

 

“A window now exists within the next two weeks to achieve a diplomatic solution,” he said.

 

“Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one.“

 

Israel on Friday struck Iranian targets with 60 fighter jets, hitting a nuclear research facility and multiple missile production sites.

 

“These sites were built over years and were the industrial centre of gravity of the Iranian Ministry of Defence,” the Israel Defence Forces said.

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his military had destroyed at least half of Iran’s missile launchers while also eliminating key military leaders and paramilitary forces.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/pm-launches-operation-bring-em-home/news-story/6fcaaf980d23f7a0daa9661cdb52c0d7

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 1:49 a.m. No.23212698   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2699 >>2162

>>23182420

>>23203273

>>23212691

Australia urges diplomacy as deadly Israel-Iran strikes ramp up and Trump weighs US options

 

Natassia Chrysanthos and Olivia Ireland - June 20, 2025

 

1/2

 

Foreign Minister Penny Wong has joined demands for Iran to stop its nuclear weapons program and come to the negotiating table within the two-week deadline set by US President Donald Trump on Friday as he decides whether to join Israel’s strikes on the country.

 

But as the Israel-Iran war entered its second week, more than 60 Israeli warplanes struck targets in Iran on Friday, including what Israel said were industrial sites used to produce missiles.

 

Israel said it had also hit the headquarters of Iran’s Organisation of Defensive Innovation and Research, which the US had previously linked to the possible development of nuclear weapons.

 

Meanwhile, Iran condemned Israel’s strike on its Arak heavy-water reactor on Thursday, describing it as a violation of international protocols designed to protect nuclear sites.

 

“Any military attack on nuclear facilities is an assault on the entire IAEA safeguards regime and ultimately the NPT,” Iran’s Foreign Minister Sayyid Abbas Araghchi posted on X.

 

In Israel, the emergency service said seven people suffered minor injuries when Iranian missiles hit a residential area in the south, causing damage to buildings.

 

Separately, Israel accused Iran of deliberately targeting civilians with cluster munitions, which disperse small bombs over a wide area.

 

And Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz warned Lebanon’s Hezbollah to exercise caution, saying Israel’s patience with “terrorists” who threaten it had worn thin.

 

A day earlier, the head of Iran-backed Hezbollah, Naim Qassem, said the Lebanon-based group would act as it saw fit in the face of what he called “brutal Israeli-American aggression”.

 

Diplomatic efforts in the shadow of missiles

 

Penny Wong spoke to her US counterpart, Marco Rubio, on Friday, as Trump warned he would decide within two weeks whether to attack Iran, most likely by striking its Fordow uranium enrichment facility, which is concealed deep underground.

 

The foreign minister said Rubio had not requested military support and did not give her own view on potential US involvement, as she stressed that Australia was not a central player in the conflict.

 

“These are matters that the US will make decisions about,” Wong said, adding that she and Rubio had “agreed to continue to work together closely to commit to a path of peace”.

 

“We want dialogue, diplomacy, and we want de-escalation, and we want Iran to return to the table. We want Iran to stop any nuclear weapons program. Iran has the opportunity to engage in diplomacy, and they should take it.”

 

A separate diplomatic initiative got under way as Araghchi prepared to travel to Geneva for meetings with the European Union’s top diplomat, and counterparts from the UK, France and Germany.

 

“Now is the time to put a stop to the grave scenes in the Middle East and prevent a regional escalation that would benefit no one,” British Foreign Minister David Lammy said before the meeting.

 

However, Araghchi told Iranian media that his country would not hold talks with the US as it was a “partner in this [Israel’s] crime” against Iran.

 

As missile and airstrikes continued in both countries, Australia was forced to evacuate its Tehran embassy, making it more difficult for the 2000 Australians in Iran and 1200 in Israel to leave, with flights in the region remaining suspended.

 

Canberra has sent military aircraft and personnel to the Middle East to help Australians in case airspace reopens, but some people have resorted to chartering ferries and private armoured cars to flee Israel. Many in Iran have struggled to make contact due to limited web access during a 36-hour internet blackout.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 1:51 a.m. No.23212699   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23212698

 

2/2

 

‘Extremely difficult’ situation

 

As several Australians expressed frustration with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, Wong acknowledged it was an “extremely difficult” situation.

 

In a statement, Wong said DFAT would provide 24-hour consular support through the emergency centre, adding that the embassy closure was in line with steps taken by other countries, including New Zealand and Switzerland.

 

“We urge Australians who are able to leave Iran to do so now if it is safe. Those who are not able to do so or who do not wish to leave are advised to shelter in place”.

 

For those stuck in Israel, Wong acknowledged the forthcoming Sabbath would make travel more difficult, but said Australia hoped to “increase the number of people who are travelling out, if they wish to do so, by bus to Jordan over the coming days”.

 

But Coalition senator Bridget McKenzie criticised DFAT’s communication, saying the information flow from the government to stranded Australians needed to improve.

 

“It’s not hard these days to actually communicate via mobile devices, to keep people up to date with the latest developments. Even if there is no development, that sort of notification can often lessen anxiety in these types of situations,” McKenzie said on Sky News.

 

Trump’s two-week timeline

 

In a White House briefing on Friday morning AEST, press secretary Karoline Leavitt delivered a message from Trump: “Based on the fact that there’s a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.”

 

Trump has frequently used “two weeks” as a time frame for making decisions, but has allowed deadlines to slide.

 

As Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Saeed Khatibzadeh warned that US intervention could lead to “hell for the whole region”, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said he trusted Trump would “do what’s best for America”.

 

“That’s a decision for the president to make, but I can tell you that they’re already helping a lot,” Netanyahu said.

 

The Kremlin warned on Friday that the Middle East was plunging into “an abyss of instability and war” and said Moscow was worried by events and still stood ready to mediate.

 

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping have both condemned Israel and urged de-escalation, with Putin’s press secretary Dmitry Peskov warning that Moscow would react “very negatively” if Israel assassinated Iran’s leader with any support from the US.

 

Israel attacked Iran on June 13, saying it aimed to prevent its long-time enemy from developing nuclear weapons. Iran retaliated with missile and drone strikes, and insists its nuclear program is peaceful.

 

At least 639 people have been killed in Iran by Israeli strikes so far, according to the Human Rights Activists News Agency, including many of the country’s military elite and nuclear scientists.

 

Israel said 24 civilians had died in Iranian missile attacks. Neither figure has been independently confirmed.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/australian-embassy-to-iran-evacuated-as-security-deteriorates-20250620-p5m8z0.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 2:05 a.m. No.23212707   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2229

>>23192221

>>23192280

UK makes plans to welcome Albanese to London

 

Nick Bonyhady and Olivia Ireland - June 20, 2025

 

The British government is making plans to welcome Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to London on a visit that could come as soon as next week if he attends Tuesday’s NATO summit in the Netherlands.

 

The behind-the-scenes work to prepare for Albanese is the strongest sign yet that he will attend next week’s summit, which could provide a chance to make up for his failed attempt to meet US President Donald Trump in Canada.

 

Sources familiar with the preparations, who were not authorised to speak publicly, said Albanese had not yet decided whether to attend the NATO event in The Hague in part because he was wary of Trump cancelling again.

 

The prime minister’s office and the British High Commission to Australia did not respond to a request for comment, but by Friday government sources believed Defence Minister Richard Marles was more likely to attend the NATO summit in Albanese’s stead.

 

Trump departed the G7 summit in Canada early to deal with the crisis in the Middle East, meaning Albanese’s first face-to-face meeting with the president was cancelled.

 

The blow has been repeatedly brushed off by Albanese and his ministers as leaders of Mexico, India, South Korea, Ukraine, and other countries also had meetings cancelled.

 

Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, is leading a diplomatic push to lock in a meeting for Albanese with Trump in Europe next week as the prime minister ponders attending the NATO event.

 

Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles was originally expected to attend, however, Albanese changed his mind and said he could go. “Yes, that’s being considered,” he told reporters.

 

The decision remains a dilemma for Albanese as the risk of Trump cancelling a second time could hurt him politically.

 

While in Canada, Albanese was also invited to 10 Downing Street by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and will make a stop in London if he does go to NATO. French President Emmanuel Macron also urged Albanese to make the trip to the Netherlands when the pair spoke.

 

Conflict between Iran and Israel remains the focus for Trump, who released a statement on Friday morning AEST, that he would decide in two weeks whether the US will join Israel and launch strikes on Iran.

 

“Based on the fact that there’s a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks,” Trump said.

 

Trump’s White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt – who read the statement to reporters in Washington – confirmed the president would attend the NATO summit later this week but that is subject to change.

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/uk-makes-plans-to-welcome-albanese-to-london-20250619-p5m8xg.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 2:33 a.m. No.23212722   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2724 >>2728 >>2263

>>23163733

>>23192221

>>23192280

Albanese ‘must raise subs with Trump’ as AUKUS deadline looms

 

SARAH ISON - June 19, 2025

 

1/2

 

The waning possibility of Anthony Albanese landing a face-to-face meeting with Donald Trump in coming weeks has sparked alarm from the Coalition and defence ­experts, who have raised concern about the two leaders not meeting before Washington’s controversial AUKUS review concludes and instead leaving the outcome “to chance”.

 

Despite indications from the Prime Minister that he may attend the NATO summit in The Hague next week – which Mr Trump may also take part in – The Australian understands that this option is becoming increasingly unlikely, amid questions over whether Mr Trump will be able to leave the US because of the Middle East crisis.

 

Without meeting the President on the sidelines of NATO, the next best option being considered by the government is a sit-down ­between the two leaders on the sidelines of a UN summit in New York in September.

 

That would be well after the Pentagon’s 30-day snap review of AUKUS concludes, which was ­announced on June 12.

 

Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said the ­inability of Mr Albanese to put ­forward Australia’s case for the ­defence pact and Canberra’s ­defence spending – which the US has been demanding be lifted – was “disappointing”.

 

“A face-to-face meeting is ­crucial to seek assurances on AUKUS,” he said. “Australia should be at the table engaging at the highest levels to advocate the importance of AUKUS and ensure our interests are understood and defended, not waiting on the sidelines. It is disappointing the Prime Minister appears unlikely to meet with President Trump before the Pentagon’s review into AUKUS concludes.”

 

Mr Taylor said the matter needed to be made a “diplomatic priority” and called for a sit-down between the two leaders to be ­secured “as soon as possible”.

 

The cancellation of their long-awaited meeting by Mr Trump – who instead left the G7 early – was downplayed by Mr Albanese as being “understandable” given the events in Israel and Iran.

 

However, unlike other leaders who had meetings with the President cancelled – such as the Mexican President and Indian Prime Minister – Mr Albanese did not receive a phone call from Mr Trump.

 

Former Defence Department deputy secretary Peter Jennings said he could not think of a prime minister who had as “unpromising” a relationship with their US counterpart in the past 40 years.

 

“I can go back in my mind as far as the Fraser government to how prime ministers have dealt with presidents,” he said. “I can’t think of a prime minister that’s had as unpromising a relationship with an American president as Mr ­Albanese and Donald Trump.

 

“That’s just a real concern. It shouldn’t be that way, given the success of the alliance and the wider relationship. So what’s going on here? Why is Albanese not trying to fix this properly? Not on a side meeting at an inter­national summit. I think he’s got his strategy completely wrong.”

 

In comments that signalled Mr Albanese might not attend the NATO summit, Foreign Minister Penny Wong said “whether it’s the Prime Minister or another senior minister, certainly Australia will be represented”. “The Prime Minister has said before he left Canada that he was considering whether he should attend NATO. Obviously, we will weigh that up,” she told ABC.

 

“What I would say is this is a time, very unstable time in the world, conflict in many parts of the world, but we have a war in Europe and a war in the Middle East, and we really need to work with other countries to do all we can to protect peace, security, and stability.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 2:34 a.m. No.23212724   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23212722

 

2/2

 

US tariffs represent another significant issue Mr Albanese has been seeking to raise with Mr Trump in person. But Senator Wong said the “perspective” on the matter had changed in light of the Israel-Iran war. “The immediate focus is on potential armed conflict and what’s going the Middle East,” she said.

 

“Opposition on tariffs remains the same … We’ll continue to press that case at every level. Obviously, the other issue that we will be discussing, and continue to discuss with the Americans, is the benefits to the United States and to the UK, as well as Australia, of the AUKUS agreement.”

 

She stressed that the meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Albanese didn’t occur purely because of the Middle East conflict, which was understandable, and that Australia was “not alone” in having missed out on such a sit-down.

 

Strategic Analysis Australia founder Michael Shoebridge said AUKUS was a national enterprise, and any review that went to the defence pact needed to be raised by national leaders.

 

“It seems important to me that our two national leaders have a discussion about AUKUS, and don’t just leave the review to people in the Pentagon,” he said.

 

“To leave it to chance, and leave it to even the most motivated defence ministers and bureaucrats in the Pentagon just doesn’t look like what a leader should do.”

 

He said that the view from the government and others that the AUKUS deal was probably not at risk was “overly complacent”. “The Australian commitment to AUKUS is one thing the Americans are continually measuring,” he said.

 

“If it doesn’t matter enough to our Prime Minister to even make contact when there’s a unilateral American review under way, that sends a signal that at the national level, we’re not all in.”

 

However, the head of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, Justin Bassi, dismissed concerns about Mr Albanese not having met with Mr Trump, saying “too much” had been read into it. “Not having a meeting within the 30-day review period is not going to determine the outcome,” he said. “AUKUS is a trilateral partnership and the UK Prime Minister has met Trump and discussed AUKUS. So a negative outcome would be neither the fault of (Keir) Starmer for meeting, nor Albanese for not meeting.”

 

Several defence and foreign ­affairs experts raised the question over how sincerely Mr Albanese was in wanting to meet Mr Trump, considering how unpredictable the President could be.

 

United States Studies Centre chief executive Michael Green added that Mr Albanese had not yet “articulated Australia’s grand strategy” in the way that Sir Keir and others had.

 

“I get the sense there’s some big, hard realities hitting Australia, like many countries. And having won a big election victory, the Prime Minister and the cabinet have got to sort out what their strategy is,” he said.

 

“I think that’s how (Sir Keir) has succeeded with Trump.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/albanese-must-raise-subs-with-trump-as-aukus-deadline-looms/news-story/96eee44240afa4cae9419950482f9daf

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 2:43 a.m. No.23212728   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2230

>>23163733

>>23192221

>>23212722

Rudd works overtime to secure Albanese an audience with Trump

 

Anthony Albanese won’t go to the NATO summit, dashing the slim chance of a meeting with Donald Trump, but work continues behind the scenes to lock in a meeting.

 

Andrew Tillett- Jun 20, 2025

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has decided against attending next week’s NATO summit in the Netherlands, dashing the slim possibility of a first face-to-face meeting with Donald Trump.

 

Albanese’s attendance at the summit was probably 50-50 at best, but after being stood up by Trump at the G7 summit in Canada this week, the Prime Minister is facing scrutiny over whether Australia is “off” with the leader of our biggest ally.

 

The snap 30-day review of the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine plan led by Pentagon official Elbridge Colby, an AUKUS sceptic; demands for Australia to lift defence spending; and a sense other countries have leaped ahead of Canberra to secure tariff concessions from Trump is also fuelling concerns.

 

At this stage, the AUKUS review process also does not provide transparency about how Australian officials can engage to make their case.

 

Multiple government sources, speaking anonymously, dispute suggestions Australia is in the diplomatic doghouse. They say Albanese was mugged by timing, both by the escalation of conflict between Israel and Iran, and the abrupt way Trump’s departure was announced.

 

Albanese, Ambassador Kevin Rudd and other Australian officials were given no heads-up that Trump was planning to leave a day early, with the announcement coming just minutes after the PM’s press conference when he told reporters he was well-prepared for the meeting with Trump.

 

Trump’s departure was reasonable given the circumstances and several other non-G7 leaders missed out on their bilateral with Trump too. But other leaders who had their meetings cancelled received the consolation prize of a presidential phone call.

 

Trump called India’s Narendra Modi and invited him to swing by the White House on his way home from Canada. Modi knocked it back, deciding he would push ahead with his already-scheduled visit to the global powerhouse of … Croatia … instead.

 

Modi also upbraided Trump over the president’s claim he helped broker the recent ceasefire between India and Pakistan. According to the briefing given to Indian media, Modi told Trump the US had nothing to do with it, and it was instead achieved through the usual communications channels when things run hot between the two countries. Such is the clout that comes when you are the biggest country in the world.

 

A government source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Albanese had been contemplating going to NATO well before his Trump meeting fell over, rejecting the idea it emerged as a last-minute fallback.

 

The sentiment was that with no guarantee Trump would go anyway, there are better places to meet and planning is underway for such an outcome.

 

US officials also privately say they are keen for Albanese and Trump to meet and are working to make it happen.

 

Late on Thursday, Foreign Minister Penny Wong spoke to her US counterpart, Secretary of State Marco Rubio. While the Middle East was the main topic, Rubio is the person the government needs to work on to get a meeting in Trump’s diary with Albanese, given his dual hats as both top diplomat and national security adviser.

 

However there are rumours Rudd is struggling to make inroads with the White House, with loyalists such as Stephen Miller, who is the president’s deputy chief of staff, nursing a long memory over Rudd’s past take-downs of Trump.

 

Other government sources dispute that, pointing out that Rudd has good access to cabinet secretaries (he was able to organise Albanese’s meeting with US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamison Greer at short notice), as well as securing a seat for Wong to Trump’s scaled-back inauguration ceremony.

 

“There are always detractors in Australia trying to take down the work he [Rudd] is doing,” one government source said.

 

There is definitely a danger in over reading the tea leaves. There has never been an administration like Trump’s. ‘Chaos in DC’ is just one description bandied about.

 

One little-noticed change that has had a big impact on the ability for both Australian and US officials to make Australia’s case is Trump’s gutting of the National Security Council.

 

In past administrations, this had been the key conduit for Rudd and his predecessors, as well US diplomats in Canberra, to tap straight into the White House.

 

It’s only just now that new appointees have taken up their job to replace purged officials. But there are fewer of them, meaning they have more countries jockeying for their ear.

 

Albanese will need to speak up to make Australia’s voice heard.

 

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/rudd-works-overtime-to-secure-albanese-an-audience-with-trump-20250620-p5m91q

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 3:24 a.m. No.23212786   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2787 >>2230

>>23041388

>>23067527

>>23094587

High Court challenge: Ben Roberts-Smith wants ex-lover to give evidence about secret recording

 

STEPHEN RICE - June 18, 2025

 

1/2

 

Ben Roberts-Smith has asked the High Court to allow a new trial in his failed defamation case that would permit his former mistress to give evidence about her explosive secretly recorded conversation with Nine reporter Nick McKenzie.

 

In an application to the court for special leave to appeal, Roberts-Smith argues that a new trial is required because cogent evidence from the woman about the conversation – in which the journalist claimed he had been “actively briefed” about Nine’s legal strategy – was concealed by the Nine newspapers.

 

In a separate notice of filing lodged with the High Court, the former SAS soldier argues he was denied the presumption of innocence in the defamation trial and wrongly branded a serial war criminal, “a criminal condemnation of the most ruinous kind”.

 

The High Court challenge is Roberts-Smith’s last chance of overturning the landmark finding by Judge Anthony Besanko that, on the balance of probabilities, the former SAS soldier was complicit in the murder of unarmed detainees in Afghanistan.

 

The High Court has not yet agreed to accept the appeal, and may not announce a decision for several weeks.

 

Last month the Full Court of the Federal Court upheld Justice Besanko’s verdict in favour of the Nine newspapers, and also rejected a claim by Roberts-Smith that he had been the victim of a miscarriage of justice after the release of a tape in which McKenzie claimed to have access to the former SAS soldier’s legal strategy.

 

In that conversation McKenzie told Roberts-Smith’s former mistress he was being “actively briefed” about the soldier’s legal strategy and that he had “breached his f..king ethics”.

 

On appeal, the Full Court found there was no “real possibility” that McKenzie’s conduct would have affected the outcome of the case.

 

The Full Bench found that McKenzie was a witness of credit and accepted his account, rejecting Roberts-Smith’s attack on his evidence. The appeal judges found no evidence that anything privileged was accessed.

 

The judges observed that the interests of justice might have required a new trial if cogent evidence was disclosed which had been concealed by Nine, but found there was no evidence that the newspapers had concealed the recordings.

 

In his new application to the High Court, Roberts-Smith says the Full Court was wrong because Nine did have prior knowledge of the conversation.

 

In an affidavit which was the subject of suppression orders during the Federal Court appeal, Roberts-Smith’s former lover, known in the trial as Person 17, revealed that in November 2023 – before the appeal commenced – she had threatened to sue Nine.

 

The woman had served a draft statement of claim on the newspapers that included her claims that McKenzie had told her he was being “actively briefed” about the soldier’s legal strategy and had breached his ethics.

 

“This was evidence which, if admitted, was capable of supporting a finding that (Nine and McKenzie) had indeed brought about the concealment of evidence that they had obtained legally privileged information, namely, the applicant’s strategy for cross-examining Person 17”, Roberts-Smith says in his application.

 

The soldier’s lawyers say the woman’s affidavit should have been allowed into evidence.

 

They say she should have been called to give evidence about her conversation with McKenzie and her conversation with Nine’s legal counsel at the time, Nicholas Owens, now a Federal Court judge.

 

“Only (Nine and McKenzie) were in a position to know what they had obtained and what had been done with that information, yet they resisted all attempts by (Roberts-Smith) to employ the processes of the court to further investigate the matter,” the application states.

 

The appeals court found there was no way of knowing if the secret recording had been “doctored”, but Roberts-Smith says there was no evidence of that, and McKenzie had not suggested it.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 3:25 a.m. No.23212787   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23212786

 

2/2

 

The application acknowledges that some of Person 17’s affidavit might have been inadmissable, but says that if Roberts-Smith had been permitted to rely on her evidence, she could have been cross-examined about the conversation and the integrity of the recording.

 

Roberts-Smith did not know what privileged information Nine had accessed and to require him to establish “a real possibility” that McKenzie’s conduct would have changed the outcome of the trial was “both unrealistic and fundamentally unfair”.

 

It meant the court would have to “take a chance” on whether the outcome of a trial of major public importance was affected by misconduct.

 

Roberts-Smith’s application for special leave also challenges the findings that he was complicit in the murder of Afghan detainees, including a ­farmer kicked off a cliff in the ­village of Darwan, and a one-legged man dragged from a tunnel at the compound known as ­Whiskey 108.

 

Roberts-Smith says that, in affirming Justice Besanko’s findings, the Full Court “erred by preferring delayed, contradictory, and memory-impaired eyewitness accounts over contemporaneous Australian Defence Force operational records of engagements”.

 

“The findings brand the applicant a serial war criminal, a criminal condemnation of the most ruinous kind, yet they were reached in civil proceedings absent the criminal trial safeguards of a jury, prosecutorial disclosure and proof beyond reasonable doubt,” the application says.

 

Last month, the Full Court appeal judges accepted the evidence of the Nine newspapers that Roberts-Smith killed the one-legged man at Whiskey 108 during a mission on Easter Sunday in 2009, observing: “The problem for the appellant is that, unlike most homicides, there were three eye­witnesses to this murder.”

 

The appeal court also accepted the evidence of Afghan witnesses from the village where Roberts-Smith was alleged to have kicked an unarmed man named, Ali Jan, off a cliff in Darwan in 2012, before ordering another soldier to shoot him.

 

Justice Besanko had given sufficient weight to discrepancies between the evidence of the Afghan witnesses, the appeal judges said, and although there were inconsistencies between their evidence and that of an Australian soldier present, Roberts-Smith’s counsel had “exaggerated their significance”.

 

Roberts-Smith’s application for special leave to appeal to the High Court argues the soldier was not given sufficient benefit of the presumption of innocence, considering the gravity of the allegations against him.

 

His lawyers argue that both Justice Besanko and the Full Court failed to properly consider the “Briginshaw principle”, which dictates that serious allegations should be treated very cautiously when a civil court makes findings.

 

In this case, “those findings rest on inconsistent and memory-impaired recollections adduced more than a decade after the events, in circumstances where contemporaneous ADF operational records are exculpatory, in the sense they record lawful engagements and no executions”, the application states.

 

“Allegations of war crimes cannot be upheld in civil proceedings unless proved to the exacting degree of cogency that (the Evidence Act) unequivocally demands.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/ben-robertssmith-wants-exlover-to-give-evidence-about-secret-recording/news-story/5f8ab66ddaf6dcf84db05c0228660884

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 4:35 a.m. No.23212894   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2899 >>2910 >>2249

>>23145527

Hawthorn's AFLW star Tilly Lucas-Rodd undergoes gender affirming top surgery

 

Marnie Vinall - 20 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Over the AFLW off-season, Hawthorn star Tilly Lucas-Rodd underwent top surgery, a gender-affirming procedure that involves the removal of breast tissue in essentially a double mastectomy.

 

"People often have asked me, 'How do I feel now that I've had it' — post surgery seeing myself," Lucas-Rodd told ABC Sport.

 

"A lot of people [who've had the operation] have really big emotions and really big elation.

 

"But for me, it was like, 'this is how I've always looked when I saw myself' … This is what I've always thought and always seen internally."

 

Lucas-Rodd had their nipples put back on with nipple grafts, which some people post-surgery choose not to.

 

Before the surgery, the 29-year-old midfielder-turned-halfback would tape their chest or wear a really tight binder, including when they were playing footy.

 

The compression would restrict their rib cage movement, make it hard to breathe and hurt their back.

 

"But the alternative was to feel really uncomfortable on a national stage playing sport — and something that's so public," said Lucas-Rodd, who is an inaugural AFLW player, former Hawks captain and All Australian.

 

Lucas-Rodd even played in a guernsey at least two sizes too big, to hide their body.

 

"Last year I wore, I think, a size medium or large when I was previously an extra small," they said.

 

"I had huge discomfort around my chest, huge dysphoria. It didn't match up with what I felt internally I should look like."

 

Now, Lucas-Rodd beams when thinking about playing this season, which starts in August.

 

"I've already felt that with training and being able to just be free, to not wear a sports bra, not wear a binder, just put my jumper on," they said.

 

"Going out onto the track in our training guernseys or our singlets, I just feel so, so happy and so just like me."

 

'What am I scared of?'

 

Lucas-Rodd is the first current AFLW player to get top surgery.

 

Former players El Chaston (Collingwood, now captain of Essendon's VFLW side) and Tori Groves-Little (Gold Coast) underwent the procedure after being delisted from their respective clubs.

 

Two years ago, Lucas-Rodd was the third player to come out as non-binary, following in the footsteps of Groves-Little and Carlton star Darcy Vescio.

 

Through a video posted to Hawthorn's website, Lucas-Rodd told fans: "I don't really identify strongly as my assigned gender at birth, which is female.

 

"I don't really feel strongly that I fit into that label as a female, and at the same time I don't feel like I'm a male, either. I guess I'm in between that. So for me, the label 'non-binary' feels most comfortable about how I identify in terms of my gender."

 

Some people who identify as non-binary also use trans rhetoric, which Lucas-Rodd said they are exploring in their self-identity.

 

"Obviously I'm non-binary, but there's transmasc," they said.

 

"But it's something I'm still exploring and getting to and I think that's awesome.

 

"That's the thing about your sexuality and gender, it's constantly evolving and ever changing."

 

Having other players be outspoken about their surgery journeys helped Lucas-Rodd. They often messaged Chaston leading into their own procedure for advice on recovery timeline and the process.

 

"I was messaging a friend a few weeks ago, and at first I wasn't going to come out publicly, and they were just curious, they said, 'Why wouldn't you?' It really made me reflect. What am I scared of?" they said.

 

"And then seeing two other people that have come from the same path of AFLW do it. I was like, 'Why can't I?' They've done it and they were accepted. So I could be the next one to do that."

 

A lot of people in Lucas-Rodd's own life don't know they've had the surgery yet.

 

"How do you bring it up?" they said. "It's daunting having to come out to individual people".

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 4:37 a.m. No.23212899   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23212894

 

2/2

 

While their close friends at the club knew about the surgery prior to it — defender Jenna Richarson was in the hospital recovery room — the rest of the Hawks' playing group and staff found out at preseason camp.

 

"I knew that we were going to be doing water based activities and things like that — and also, being football, you do a lot of recovery, and are in the water a lot, in your bathing suits together — and for me, now the greatest thing is I don't have to wear anything on top," they said.

 

"So I knew going into camp that I'd kind of have to tell the team.

 

"I messaged the group and they were amazing. I saw them the next day at footy, and there were a few questions and lots of interest … But everyone just met me with such love and acceptance."

 

Comments that were hard to read

 

It is, however, a daunting prospect for Lucas-Rodd having the wider AFL community learn about their story.

 

"Nerve-racking," is the word they use.

 

"Whenever I've spoken out on queer issues, whether it be Pride Round or when I came out as non binary a few years ago, the comments that were hard to read were from probably not the AFLW community, it was the AFL and the broader Australian community," they said.

 

"There was some horrendous stuff (on X and Facebook). So I've definitely spoken to my family and friends about that, that possibility the broader AFL community will now have comment. It's not going to be in my safe space of just AFLW fans.

 

"But when you're doing it for something that's bigger than yourself, you kind of take that and you accept that that's going to happen.

 

"And I've got really supportive people in my close circle that will shower me with love, and put their arms around me."

 

Lucas-Rodd wanted to share their story for others who might be able to relate or feel seen.

 

"For people that might not be able to have these conversations, might not be able to start this process of gender affirming care, because they can't have those conversations with people in their own lives," they said.

 

"It's also to show gender diverse and trans people that there is a place for them in sport.

 

"Coming out publicly with top surgery, people will say and do what they want, but I'm trying to show people that no matter what gender you are, no matter how you express that, no matter anything about you, that you belong in sport and you belong in sport at a professional and elite level.

 

"That's a big thing for me … being like regardless of your gender and how you express that, there is this place for you in sport."

 

The main emotion tied to Lucas-Rodd's surgery is joy.

 

"If I see myself, especially shirtless, I'm like, 'This rocks,'" they said.

 

"Being on the other side now, it's a huge relief. You can kind of build it up in your head, and obviously there's nervousness and anxiety, and that's a real thing.

 

"There's real reasons you feel that. But being on the other side, yeah, it's amazing."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-20/tilly-lucas-rodd-top-surgery-first-aflw-player/105432144

 

https://www.instagram.com/tillylr/reel/DLIyaPeTuVH/

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 4:42 a.m. No.23212910   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2919 >>2249

>>23145527

>>23212894

AFLW star Tilly Lucas-Rodd ‘so happy’ after gender-affirming top surgery

 

Non-binary Hawthorn star Tilly Lucas-Rodd has spoken about undergoing gender-affirming top surgery during the AFLW off-season.

 

heraldsun.com.au - June 20, 2025

 

AFLW star Tilly Lucas-Rodd has revealed they are “so happy” and feel so much like themselves after having gender-affirming top surgery during the off-season.

 

The 29-year-old Hawthorn star is the league’s first current player to undergo the surgery - which removes breast tissue in a similar way to a double mastectomy - and said they feel so much more comfortable.

 

“People often have asked me, ‘How do I feel now that I’ve had it’ - post-surgery, seeing myself,” Lucas-Rodd, who identifies as non-binary, told ABC Sport.

 

“… for me, it was like, ‘this is how I’ve always looked when I saw myself’ … This is what I’ve always thought and always seen internally.”

 

Prior to the surgery, Lucas-Rodd was taping or binding their chest and wearing a guernsey multiple sizes too large in order to reduce dysphoria.

 

This practice however, was causing issues, sometimes restricting breathing and movement, and creating back pain.

 

Since returning to training, however, Lucas-Rodd said they are relishing the freedom of not needing a sports bra or chest bindings.

 

“Going out onto the track in our training guernseys or our singlets, I just feel so, so happy and so just like me,” they said.

 

“I had huge discomfort around my chest, huge dysphoria. It didn’t match up with what I felt internally I should look like.”

 

The halfback came out publicly as non-binary in 2023, saying at the time that they “don’t really identify strongly as my assigned gender at birth, which is female.”

 

“I don’t really feel strongly that I fit into that label as a female, and at the same time I don’t feel like I’m a male, either. I guess I’m in between that,” they said in a video shared on the Hawthorn website.

 

“So for me, the label ‘non-binary’ feels most comfortable about how I identify in terms of my gender.”

 

Two other AFLW players, Carlton star Darcy Vescio and former Gold Coast player Tori Groves-Little, also identify as non-binary, and two former players have undergone gender-reaffirming top surgery since leaving the league.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 21, 2025, 4:45 a.m. No.23212919   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23212910

 

2/2

 

Lucas-Rodd spoke to their Hawthorn teammates about the surgery when returning to training and said they were met with “such love and acceptance”.

 

While opening themselves up to public commentary by sharing their story has been nerve-racking, Lucas-Rodd said they hope to help others in a similar position.

 

“It’s also to show gender diverse and trans people that there is a place for them in sport,” they said.

 

“Coming out publicly with top surgery, people will say and do what they want, but I’m trying to show people that no matter what gender you are, no matter how you express that, no matter anything about you, that you belong in sport and you belong in sport at a professional and elite level.

 

“That’s a big thing for me … being like regardless of your gender and how you express that, there is this place for you in sport.”

 

Since sharing their ABC Sport interview on Instagram, Lucas-Rodd has recieved many messages of support, including from Aussie musician G Flip who said, “Hells yeah Tilly,” and Wentworth star Zoe Terakes, who shared a series of strong arm and love heart emojis.

 

https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/aflw/aflw-star-tilly-lucasrodd-so-happy-after-genderaffirming-top-surgery/news-story/e67f07be30395d0d37b327f1a8194ffd

 

https://www.hawthornfc.com.au/video/1327324/an-announcement-from-aflw-captain-tilly-lucas-rodd

 

 

Former AFLW player El Chaston opens up on life-changing breast removal surgery to find their true self

 

Lauren Wood - May 19, 2023

 

El Chaston doesn’t want to shock you. They want to educate you. About why they identify as non-binary and what for them was an easy decision to have a double mastectomy to fully embrace who they are. They share their incredible story with Lauren Wood.

 

https://www.instagram.com/p/CnROE6ovkgx/

 

https://www.valleyplasticsurgery.com.au/dr-alys-saylor/

 

https://archive.vn/d8OqC#18871739

 

>Think logically.

>Ask yourself - is this normal?

>Conspiracy?

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 22, 2025, 2:01 a.m. No.23218742   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8746 >>8784 >>8831 >>8858 >>4342 >>4354 >>4365 >>4370 >>4374 >>4390 >>4392 >>0111 >>0126 >>0188 >>4829 >>8389 >>2162

>>23192221

Trump warns against Iran retaliation after ‘spectacular success’ of US nuclear strikes

 

JOE KELLY - 22 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Donald Trump has threatened further attacks on Iran if the regime retaliates to the US precision strikes against three of the rogue nation’s nuclear enrichment facilities, warning that it will be met with a tragedy “far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days.”

 

The US President said that America had “completely and totally obliterated” the Islamic theocracy’s nuclear enrichment facilities, arguing that he had worked as a team with Israel to inflict a major blow against the rogue nation.

 

In an address to the nation at 10:00pm on Saturday night, Mr Trump demand that Iran sue for peace and accept a diplomatic solution to relinquish its dream of a nuclear bomb. He reminded the regime that “there are many targets left.”

 

“If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill,” he said. “Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.”

 

Posting on his Truth Social platform a short time later, Mr Trump said that “any retaliation by Iran against the United States of America will be met with force far greater than what was witnessed tonight.”

 

Three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites were targeted by America including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan.

 

The US deployed its massive 30,000 pound “bunker buster” bombs for the first time in an active military operation to target the Fordow site which is buried deep under a mountain and 80 metres of solid rock.

 

It is too early for a clear assessment.

 

While Mr Trump said on Thursday that he would take a decision on whether to intervene in the Middle East within two weeks, he surprised the world by striking the three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites just two days later.

 

Addressing the nation on Saturday night, Mr Trump said that his “objective was the destruction of Iran’s nuclear enrichment capacity and a stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world’s number one state sponsor of terror.”

 

“The strikes were a spectacular military success. Iran’s key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated,” he said. “Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier.”

 

“This cannot continue,” he said. “There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days.”

 

The US President said that he had “worked as a team” with Israel “like perhaps no team has ever worked before. And we’ve gone a long way to erasing this horrible treat to Israel.”

 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Mr Trump’s “bold decision to target Iran’s nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history.”

 

“America has been truly unsurpassed. It has done what no other country on earth could do,” he said. “History will record that President Trump acted to deny the world’s most dangerous regime the world’s most dangerous weapons.”

 

Mr Netanyahu said that the US President had “created a pivot of history that can help lead the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity and peace.”

 

Israel was alerted by Washington before the strikes and the US President spoke with his Israeli counterpart after the operation. Mr Trump posted on his Truth Social platform following the precision strikes that “now is the time for peace.”

 

“This is an historic moment for the United States of America, Israel and the world.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 22, 2025, 2:02 a.m. No.23218746   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23218742

 

2/2

 

However, leading Democrats took aim at Mr Trump’s decision to intervene, with the Minority Leader of the US House of Representatives Hakeem Jeffries arguing that the “risk of war has now dramatically increased, and I pray for the safety of our troops.”

 

“President Trump misled the country about his intentions, failed to seek congressional authorisation for the use of military force and risks American entanglement in a potentially disastrous war in the Middle East,” he said.

 

Jim Himes, the ranking Democrat on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence said that Mr Trump “decision to launch direct military action against Iran without congressional approval is a clear violation of the Constitution.”

 

“It is impossible to know at this stage whether this operation accomplished its objectives,” he said. “We also don’t know if this will lead to further escalation in the region and attacks against our forces.”

 

Democratic representative for New York, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, said that Mr Trump had “impulsively risked launching a war that may ensnare us for generations.”

 

“It is absolutely and clearly grounds for impeachment.”

 

However, the Republican House Speaker, Mike Johnson, defended the decision to strike Iran’s nuclear enrichment facilities without congressional approval.

 

He said there was an understanding within Congress of the “urgency of this situation,” and posted on social media that Mr Trump had “evaluated that the imminent danger outweighed the time it would take for Congress to act.”

 

“Tonight’s necessary, limited, and targeted strike follows the history and tradition of similar military actions under presidents of both parties,” he said.

 

Majority Senate Leader John Thune said that the “regime in Iran, which has committed itself to bringing ‘death to America’ and wiping Israel off the map, has rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace.”

 

“President Trump has been consistent and clear that a nuclear-armed Iran will not be tolerated,” he said. “That posture has now been enforced with strength, precision and clarity.”

 

Roger Wicker, the Republican Chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said that Mr Trump had made a “deliberate - and correct - decision to eliminate the existential threat posed by the Iranian regime.”

 

“We now have very serious choices ahead to provide security for our citizens and our allies and stability for the middle-east,” he said.

 

The current conflict began when Israel launched its Operation Rising Lion on June 13 which had the central objective of removing the existential threat posed by Iran’s nuclear weapon program.

 

The campaign had already achieved major victories in crippling the Iranian chain of command and gaining supremacy in the air.

 

The Israelis also took out the regime’s top military commanders, killed several of its leading nuclear scientists, degraded its missile capabilities and struck vital energy infrastructure including its oil and gas facilities.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/trump-warns-against-iran-retaliation-after-spectacular-success-of-us-nuclear-strikes/news-story/71f64aba0e7f313e032b5e08a2f52539

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fw7OKmoMbt8

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jWObjdvVaLk

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 22, 2025, 2:26 a.m. No.23218784   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8786 >>8831 >>8858 >>4342 >>2162

>>23218742

Australian government calls for de-escalation of war in Iran as Coalition endorses US strikes

 

Maani Truu - 22 June 2025

 

1/2

 

The Australian government has offered no endorsement of the United States's strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, instead issuing a statement reiterating calls for de-escalation as the opposition put forward its support for the military action.

 

Donald Trump announced the United States had dropped "a full payload of bombs" on the Fordow nuclear site on Sunday, along with strikes on two other locations, declaring Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities "completely and totally obliterated".

 

In response, a government spokesperson said: "We have been clear that Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security.

 

"We note the US president’s statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy."

 

A short time after the government released its statement, the opposition came out in support of what it called the "proactive action" to bomb the nuclear facilities.

 

"The Coalition supports the military action taken by the United States to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, specifically the strikes taken today against the facilities at Isfahan, Natanz and, critically, Fordow," acting Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister Andrew Hastie told reporters in Western Australia.

 

"We could never accept a nuclear Iran — Iran is a repressive, theocratic autocracy, and it's a sponsor of terrorism.

 

"The Coalition does not want war, we do not want war, but we believe this was a necessary action to take by the United States military."

 

Current and past Liberal politicians were quick to offer their strong support for the strikes, calling on the government to do the same.

 

Former prime minister Scott Morrison said Mr Trump was left with no other option given the risks of Iran's nuclear program, while Liberal Senator Dave Sharma told Sky News it was "essential that Australia supports what the United States has done".

 

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is yet to respond to the developments personally.

 

Earlier on Sunday — before Mr Trump announced the strikes — Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles said the government's position remained de-escalation, while noting it recognised Israel's right to defend itself and the risk of Iran's nuclear program.

 

"We acknowledge all of that, but we are concerned about the prospect of escalation here and this entering into some wider kind of conflict," he told Sky News.

 

"And that's why we are exercising our voice internationally, along with many other countries, to de-escalate and to put an emphasis on dialogue, on diplomacy."

 

Meanwhile, Greens foreign affairs spokesperson David Shoebridge urged the government to distance itself from the conflict and state clearly it would not participate in the war, including by allowing the use of military bases in Australia as part of attacks.

 

"Our government needs to call out Donald Trump for the warmonger that he is and clearly say that Australia will not be a part of this and speak against yet another escalation of violence in the Middle East," he said.

 

"You cannot bomb your way to peace … and the people who are always going to pay the price are the ordinary people on the street."

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 22, 2025, 2:28 a.m. No.23218786   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23218784

 

2/2

 

Coalition MP calls for clarity on use of bases

 

In an address to the nation late on Saturday night, local time, Mr Trump described the action as a "spectacular military success", while a spokesperson for Iran's nuclear organisation told state media the Fordow site experienced limited damage.

 

The extent of the damage is yet to be independently assessed.

 

Mr Trump later posted to Truth Social — a social media platform — that any Iranian retaliation on the United States would be "met with a force far greater than what was witnessed tonight".

 

Speaking to ABC's Insiders minutes before Mr Trump announced the attack, Mr Hastie warned that escalating the war was "very dangerous and risky" and could lead to unintended consequences.

 

"We could see regime change, a collapse of the Iranian regime, large-scale migration and refugees across the world, but particularly Europe. We don't know who would fill the power vacuum," he said.

 

"If there is one lesson I take out of Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya — be careful what you wish for. Sometimes it's better the devil you know, particularly for stability."

 

He also said there needed to be greater transparency over how the United States used Australian military bases.

 

Mr Marles this week did not say whether American forces could make use of Australian military bases in the north in an action against Iran, stating "we have a system of full knowledge and concurrence" of operations from Australia.

 

"We need greater transparency, to talk about operationalising the alliance, building guard rails for combat operations and defining our sovereignty," Mr Hastie said.

 

"This will make things clearer for us, so we can better preserve our national interests."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-22/government-opposition-response-us-strikes-iran/105446620

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-22/donald-trump-says-us-bombed-three-iranian-nuclear-sites/105446590

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 22, 2025, 2:55 a.m. No.23218831   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2164

>>23218742

>>23218784

Andrew Hastie slams Labor’s ‘ambiguous’ response to Iran strikes

 

BEN PACKHAM and ELLIE DUDLEY - 22 June 2025

 

Opposition acting foreign affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie has slammed the Albanese government’s “ambiguous” response to the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites.

 

Mr Hastie, speaking to reporters in Perth, said the Coalition backed US president Donald Trump’s move to strike the facilities, saying Iran was “moving towards acquiring a nuclear weapon”.

 

“We could never accept a nuclear Iran. Iran is a repressive theocratic autocracy, and it’s a sponsor of terrorism,” he said.

 

“President Trump gave the offer of negotiations, and over the last two days, the Iranians have not taken up that offer. The Coalition stands in solidarity with the Iranian people. We regret the loss of life in Iran and Israel, and we hope for a peaceful settlement going forward.”

 

Asked what he made of the Albanese government’s response to the strikes, Mr Hastie said it was “far too ambiguous”.

 

“The United States is a close ally. The United States has a key role in re-establishing order and peace in the Middle East,” he said. “And Iran, by contrast, is a regime that sponsors terrorism. It sponsored Hamas, Hezbollah.”

 

Earlier on Sunday, an unnamed government spokesperson called for “de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy” but did not explicitly support or condemn the actions of Mr Trump.

 

Former home affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo told The Australian on Sunday the Albanese government can’t leave the US to do the world’s “dirty work” without Australian support.

 

Mr Pezzullo said the US strikes were the only way to decisively set back Iran’s nuclear program.

 

“Australia should voice its support for this necessary action,” the noted strategist said.

 

“It cannot leave the dirty work of confronting threats to peace and stability such as that posed by Iran’s nuclear weapons program to the United States, and in the case of Iran, Israel.

 

“Peace can ultimately only be preserved by strength and the will to use that strength.”

 

Mr Pezzullo said the government would be unable to say precisely how Australia might have supported the strikes behind the scenes.

 

But he said it should be transparent with the public that “as a matter of long-standing policy, Australia hosts a range of US intelligence, surveillance, and communications capabilities that might from time to time play a role in US force projection operations”.

 

“The Australian government has full knowledge of, and concurs with, the use by the United States of these functions,” he said, in an apparent reference to joint facilities at Pine Gap and North West Cape, and agreements for the US to use Australian military bases.

 

“If it is the case that Australian infrastructure and facilities were used physically in direct support of this strike mission, the Australian people should be told, at least in general terms.

 

“Australia should be ready to further assist the United States to deal with retaliatory action by Iran, on the clear understanding that our forces need to remain focused on deterrence in the Indo-Pacific region,” Mr Pezzullo said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/pezzullo-urges-australia-to-help-us-do-the-dirty-work-to-deter-iran/news-story/9965f43f6e853b536a3b940146708421

 

https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1936605842796687502

 

https://x.com/WhiteHouse/status/1936605859406135328

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 22, 2025, 3:12 a.m. No.23218858   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2164

>>23218742

>>23218784

‘Last resort’: Scott Morrison backs US attack on Iranian nuclear sites

 

The former prime minister has weighed in on the US strikes on Iran, and the Australian government’s conduct towards the Middle East conflict.

 

Samantha Maiden - June 22, 2025

 

Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has backed US President Donald Trump’s decision to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities as “a last resort”, urging Australia to now speak with clarity about why the US had to act.

 

Describing the bombing as “a necessary event”, Mr Morrison stressed that the United States had launched a targeted mission and was not proposing regime change.

 

Speaking on Sky News, he said it reflected the fact the US was the only ally of Israel with the military hardware to penetrate Iran’s underground nuclear bunkers.

 

“There were no other options available to the President,’’ Mr Morrison said.

 

“I think President Trump has been very clear about seeking to get an agreement with Iran.

 

“This was completely rejected, and made it very clear that there was no negotiation now there was the opportunity for complete capitulation and that was not offered, and they are the only military in the world that is capable of doing what it has just done, and that is what has happened.”

 

But in a barbed observation on the conduct of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong he urged Australia to now speak with “clarity.”

 

“Well, it’s time for some clarity. I think there’s been far too much ambiguity about this from Australia, far too much ambiguity,’’ he said.

 

“And it’s time for clarity. And the clarity is we were dealing with a theocratic authoritarian state that sponsored an attack on a close friend in Israel back on October 7.

 

“They have shown their true colours. And Iran is not a friend of Australia. It’s not a friend of Australia’s interests. This is not a conflict not with the people of Iran who are wonderful people.”

 

Mr Morrison said that President Trump would have been a reluctant convert to involving the US military in the conflict.

 

“The President came to office with a peace through strength doctrine, and we have now seen what that means when all other avenues fail,’’ Mr Morrison said.

 

“This is a President that I think doesn’t wish to rush to these outcomes or to use these capabilities, but if necessary will. And as a result, a massive blow has been struck against Iran’s nuclear capability.

 

“This is not something that I believe he wants to see widened, but this hopefully resolves that question of their nuclear capability, which is something that has been sought for a very long time.”

 

The big issue to understand Mr Morrison said was that only the US had the capability to drop a bomb that could target Iran’s underground nuclear bunker.

 

“I think obviously, if Israel had been capable of doing this, then, then that would have been the preferred option, no question other than to evolve, you know, the direct defensive capability of the United States, that would not have been a preferred option, as I said, it became the necessary option,’’ he said.

 

“Now Israel will make its own decisions about how it continues to prosecute its conflict with Iran, the US has played, I think, a very specific role here which only they could have, only they could have done. I think that needs to be underlined. That was the only reason I believe that this would have drawn the US directly into this.”

 

Mr Morrison said it was not about “regime change” in Iran.

 

“This is not the place that President Trump would rather be. He has not rushed towards this and further. This is not about the US trying to oppose some sort of regime change,’’ he said.

 

https://www.news.com.au/world/last-resort-morrison-backs-trump-attack/news-story/8337086045393645f1bd94d27a336c83

 

https://x.com/ScoMo30/status/1936588744792109494

 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114724035571020048

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 23, 2025, 1:54 a.m. No.23224342   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4344 >>4354 >>4365 >>4370 >>4374 >>0111 >>0126 >>0188 >>4829 >>2164

>>23218742

>>23218784

Anthony Albanese declares Australia backs US strikes to stop Iran’s nuclear program - a day later

 

NOAH YIM - 23 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese has reiterated that his government backs the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites but that it does not want to see an “escalation and a full-scale war” following the attack.

 

“The world has long agreed that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon and we support action to prevent that – that is what this is,” the Prime Minister said at a press conference in Canberra on Monday morning.

 

“The US action was directed at specific sites central to Iran’s nuclear program. We don’t want escalation and a full-scale war. We continue to call for dialogue and for diplomacy.

 

“As I have said for many days now, we are deeply concerned about any escalation in the region and we want to see diplomacy, dialogue and de-escalation.”

 

Mr Albanese called on Iran to “not to take any further action that could destabilise the region”.

 

Mr Albanese declined to say whether or not Australia was given warning – like the UK was – before the US struck Iranian nuclear sites.

 

“This was a unilateral action taken by the United States,” the Prime Minister said.

 

He was asked repeatedly whether this meant his government did not know this would happen but Mr Albanese declined to provide a direct answer.

 

He however noted the UK “has been one of the countries that’s been at the negotiating table with Iran for many years on its nuclear weapons program”.

 

Earlier Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong said the Albanese government backed the US decision to strike nuclear facilities in Iran, the enunciation of support coming almost 24 hours after the US operation.

 

The government, in the hours after the attack, urged “de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy”, and did not explicitly back the US strikes.

 

But on Monday, Senator Wong said she backed the attack. “We support action to prevent Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon,” she told Channel 9. “And that is what this is. So the answer – the answer is yes.”

 

She said the US had not made a request for Australian military assistance.

 

Senator Wong said she remained “concerned, as are so many people around the world, about continued escalation”.

 

“No one wants to see full-scale war in the Middle East,” she said.

 

Senator Wong, when presented with the apparent difference between the US’s decision to strike nuclear sites and the Albanese government’s constant appeals for de-escalation, claimed she was broadly in line with key allies.

 

“What I said was Iran had to come to the negotiating table, and we urged Iran to come back to the negotiating table and engage in diplomacy,” she said.

 

“It’s the same thing. I think the US President was saying it’s the same thing that (UK) Prime Minister (Keir) Starmer was saying. It’s the same thing.”

 

On Monday, Mr Albanese called a meeting of the National Security Committee.

 

The Prime Minister has not made public appearances since returning from the G7 summit late last week. The National Security Committee is a subcommittee of cabinet.

 

Mr Albanese and Senator Wong chose against addressing Australians on Sunday after the US became directly involved in the conflict, ­instead issuing a statement from an unnamed government spokesman.

 

Senator Wong said she was “sure” Mr Albanese would address the public later in the day, responding to criticism the public had not heard from Mr Albanese after the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. “It’s not an unusual thing for government to use spokespeople,” she told Channel 7 when asked why the government statement response yesterday was not from Mr Albanese.

 

While Mr Trump warned of “far greater” attacks against Iran unless it pursued peace, the ­Albanese government, through its spokesman, said it would “continue to call for de-­escalation, dialogue and diplomacy … We have been clear that Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to inter­national peace and security.

 

“We note the US President’s statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile.”

 

The statement was in line with comments issued by Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles before the US intervention being made public, signalling Labor’s position in the conflict may not be impacted by the ­actions of Australia’s closest mil­itary ally.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 23, 2025, 1:56 a.m. No.23224344   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23224342

 

2/2

 

Senator Wong’s belated media appearances on Monday morning follow Labor’s relationship with the US coming under growing scrutiny, given the Prime Minister has not secured a face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump.

 

The Coalition immediately threw its support behind Mr Trump’s attack, in a rare point of difference with Labor on foreign affairs since the May election drubbing.

 

Acting opposition foreign affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie condemned the Albanese government for being “far too ambiguous” on the issue.

 

“The US is a close ally. The US has a key role in re-establishing order and peace in the Middle East,” he said. “And Iran, by contrast, is a ­regime that sponsors terrorism. It sponsored Hamas, Hezbollah.”

 

Mr Hastie said Iran was moving towards “acquiring a nuclear weapon”, a development that was unacceptable.

 

“We could never accept a ­nuclear Iran,” he said. “Iran is a repressive theocratic autocracy, and it’s a sponsor of ­terrorism.”

 

Former prime minister Scott Morrison said it was “time for some clarity” from the Albanese government on the issue.

 

Mr Morrison – a co-architect of AUKUS who is now employed at a US-based national security think tank – said “there were no other options available” to Mr Trump.

 

“This has been the most decisive and the most comprehensive action to terminate that threat,” Mr Morrison told Sky News.

 

Former home affairs secretary Michael Pezzullo said the Albanese government couldn’t leave the US to do the world’s “dirty work” without Australian support.

 

After the government issued its statement via an unnamed spokesman, Mr Pezzullo said the US strikes were the only way to decisively set back Iran’s nuclear program.

 

“Australia should voice its support for this necessary action,” he told The Australian. “It cannot leave the dirty work of confronting threats to peace and stability such as that posed by Iran’s nuclear weapons program to the US and, in the case of Iran, Israel.

 

“Peace can ultimately only be preserved by strength and the will to use that strength. Australia should be ready to further assist the US to deal with retaliatory action by Iran, on the clear understanding that our ­forces need to remain focused on deterrence in the Indo-Pacific ­region.”

 

Mr Marles, who will this week represent Australia at the NATO summit in The Netherlands scheduled to be attended by Mr Trump, refused to say whether he believed Iran was close to securing a nuclear weapon.

 

“We do believe that the Iranian nuclear and ballistic missile program is a threat to the peace and stability of both the region and the world,” Mr Marles told Sky News less than two hours before Mr Trump announced the strikes had taken place.

 

“But our view also in relation to this conflict is that there is a real risk of escalation here, which is why we have used our voice to urge a de-escalation.”

 

Writing in The Australian, Strategic Analysis Australia director Peter Jennings described the Albanese government’s response as a “shambles”.

 

He accused Mr Marles of calling “three times for ‘de-escalation’ even as Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities were being dismantled in real time”.

 

“Calling for dialogue at this point is detached from reality and weakens Australia’s credibility among key allies,” he wrote.

 

He also accused Mr Marles of performing a “major breach of operational security” by describing a build-up of Australian personnel at the Al Minhad military base near Dubai.

 

“Al Minhad could clearly be an Iranian or proxy force target if the regime lashes out against the US and allies in the region. There was no need for Marles to announce a build-up of Australian Defence personnel,” he wrote.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/anthony-albanese-us-at-odds-over-actions-and-approach-in-middle-east/news-story/887fa7604d85a2c2ad12d0d22d26672e

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lPeKURMoJ8

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiDLIWrCxOg

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 23, 2025, 2:07 a.m. No.23224354   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4356 >>2165

>>23218742

>>23224342

COMMENTARY: Canberra out of its depth as US, Israel remake Middle East

 

PETER JENNINGS - 22 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Donald Trump just redrew the strategic map of the Middle East – and Australia’s response is to urge “dialogue”.

 

Trump claimed the US strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities was a “spectacular military success” and that the sites had been “completely and totally obliterated”.

 

It’s too early to be completely certain of that, particularly about the effectiveness of the strike on the deeply buried Fordow nuclear fuel enrichment facility.

 

The US will do bomb damage assessment based on satellite imagery and, if necessary, go back to complete the job.

 

It’s remarkable that Iran seemed not to offer resistance.

 

Fordow was reportedly protected by Russian S-300 anti-aircraft missiles, presumably destroyed by earlier Israeli strikes.

 

Remarkable, too, was President Trump’s willingness to promise more bombing after a domestic political debate where Republican and Democratic Party leaders emphasised strikes should not happen or be very limited.

 

In a statement after the attack, Trump emphasised that if Iran did not make peace, there are many other targets the US can hit “in a matter of minutes”.

 

Trump said: “Future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier. This cannot continue. There will be either peace or there will be tragedy for Iran, far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days.”

 

Military strikes alone don’t solve complex problems, but, politically, Trump emerges from these events in a stronger position to move beyond the constraints on international military action demanded by US isolationists.

 

That’s important because at a time of significant challenge to the US’s international leadership coming from China, Russia and its regional partners Iran and North Korea, Trump needs the latitude to use military force.

 

He can go to the NATO summit this week in a position to demand more military investment from his European allies. Many need no further persuasion.

 

The US strike has been of enormous political benefit to Israel.

 

Trump said: “I want to thank and congratulate Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. We worked as a team like perhaps no team has ever worked before.”

 

In this team, Netanyahu deserves the credit for shaping the strategy of the attack on Iran, which ultimately brought in the US.

 

It is likely Israel had developed a plan to destroy Fordow, perhaps using special forces. Letting the US do it cements a political partnership of immense value to Israel as it consolidates its military dominance over Iran.

 

Make no mistake: Netanyahu sees this campaign as reshaping the Middle East balance of power. He told the Hebrew-language Kan News on June 19: “There is a historic turning point. I see this through a historical lens … The entire Middle East axis is shifting.”

 

Israel will keep prosecuting the war, hoping the Iranian regime collapses under its own weight. There will be no shift to peace negotiations soon.

 

Israel will have great incentive to keep hitting Iranian missile and drone capabilities. It will want to maintain control over Iranian airspace indefinitely. The speed with which Iran’s missile capabilities and senior military leadership have been destroyed is, frankly, astonishing. Israel cannot afford to give Iran breathing space to reconstitute.

 

The big strategic question here is: can the Iranian regime survive? I would not underestimate its capacity to repress the Iranian people into submission.

 

Brutal regimes in the Middle East try to hang on to power for as long as possible, but as we saw in Syria in December last year, when the end comes it comes fast.

 

What we have seen so far is that the Iranian military and Revolutionary Guard have been completely hollow.

 

It will be difficult to launch major retaliatory strikes against the US or Israel in an environment where they have lost control of their airspace.

 

One can’t rule out attacks on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, or from the Houthis in the Red Sea, or from Iranian-backed militias in Iraq. These may not be of a scale that shifts the advantage back to Tehran. The Iranian regime faces profound instability. If Iranians lose their fear of repression, collapse may follow.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 23, 2025, 2:09 a.m. No.23224356   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23224354

 

2/2

 

Australia’s response remains a shambles. Appearing on Sky News on Sunday morning, Defence Minister Richard Marles called three times for “de-escalation”, even as Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities were being dismantled in real time.

 

He acknowledged “the risk that the Iranian nuclear and ballistic missile program represents to both the region and the stability of the world” but still emphasised that “we’ve been urging dialogue and diplomacy”.

 

Calling for dialogue at this point is detached from reality and weakens Australia’s credibility among key allies.

 

Marles also told Sky News: “We have a C-17 and a KC-30 (aircraft) which both can take hundreds of passengers placed in Al Minhad, which is just outside of Dubai … We normally have a footprint of about 40 people at the base that we operate out of at Al Minhad. That’s been raised to about 300.”

 

This is a major breach of operational security. Al Minhad could clearly be an Iranian or proxy force target if the regime lashes out against the US and allies in the region.

 

There was no need for Marles to announce a build-up of Australian defence personnel. His ill-considered comments add to the risk they might be attacked.

 

Marles says that if Iran and Israeli airspace “opens up”, Australian citizens can be flown home, but if the airspace is opened, they can catch commercial flights. Our government is just focused on theatrics, not substance.

 

Marles will also go to NATO this week denying that Australia should urgently lift its defence spending. That will put him on the outer with the US, with many European countries and with Japan, New Zealand and South Korea – the other members of the so-called IP4 – meeting at The Hague summit.

 

What is it that all these countries see that Australia can’t about our strategic outlook? Marles is completely out of his depth in a government that has marginalised our international standing. He continues to weaken our military at a time the rest of the democratic world is waking up to the threat.

 

Peter Jennings is director of Strategic Analysis Australia and was executive director of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute from 2012 to 2022. He is a former deputy secretary for strategy in the Defence Department (2009-12).

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/canberra-out-of-its-depth-as-us-israel-remake-middle-east/news-story/1b95c4fdfb6ae14c1cc07cccac2bef68

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 23, 2025, 2:21 a.m. No.23224365   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2165

>>23218742

>>23224342

Anthony Albanese, Penny Wong too slow to back Iran strikes

 

Labor’s reluctant show of support for US strikes on Iran will give Donald Trump fresh cause to question Canberra’s dependability.

 

BEN PACKHAM - 23 June 2025

 

The Albanese government has yet again been dragged kicking and screaming to support its closest ally as it does the heavy lifting to strengthen global security.

 

It took a staggering 24 hours for the government to back the US’s surgical strikes on Iran to prevent the rogue state getting nuclear weapons.

 

On Sunday, as Australians digested the momentous news, Labor’s issued an equivocal statement calling for “de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy”, delivered via an unnamed spokesman.

 

Not a word from Anthony Albanese or Penny Wong.

 

Fast forward to Monday morning and it had finally got its act together, rolling out the Foreign Minister to voice Australia’s support for the action.

 

A terse nine-minute press conference followed, in which the Prime Minister suggested the government had backed the strikes all along.

 

“The world has long agreed that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, and we support action to prevent that. That is what this is,” he said.

 

This was inevitably where the government was going to land. Why couldn’t it have said so earlier?

 

“We issued a statement yesterday,” Albanese retorted, when asked about the delay.

 

All of this will have given the Trump administration further cause to see Australia under Labor is a less dependable ally than it once was.

 

Yet the government still expects the full benefits of US protection and its “crown jewels” – nuclear submarine technology.

 

Unlike Britain’s Keir Starmer, who was given a heads-up on the strikes by the White House, the PM indicated Australia received no prior warning.

 

It’s inconceivable to think any other Australian government would have been kept in the dark on such a consequential mission, at least since the dark days of the alliance under Whitlam and Nixon.

 

Polls show Australians overwhelmingly dislike Donald Trump, a sentiment Labor happily took advantage of to seal its landslide election victory.

 

But Australians also overwhelmingly support the US alliance and deserve to know where their government stands when such consequential world events are unfolding.

 

Australians don’t want more war and suffering in the Middle East but they are smart enough to know that the world faces an even bigger threat if Tehran obtains nuclear weapons.

 

The Australia-US alliance has lasted 73 years and remains solid. But it has become clear the Albanese government’s relationship with the Trump administration is not where it needs to be.

 

The President’s move to cancel his G7 meeting with Albanese without so much as a phone call was a clear snub for the PM and a warning over the parlous state of the relationship.

 

There is still no sign of when the leaders will have their first meeting, and the longer it goes the worse things will get.

 

Australia-US ties will be in the spotlight once again at the NATO summit in the Netherlands this week, where Richard Marles – standing in for the PM – will have to sit through fresh US calls for its allies to spend more on their own security.

 

Labor is stubbornly refusing to countenance lifting its defence budget from its current 2 per cent of GDP to the 3.5 per cent sought by the White House.

 

This is unsustainable and will blow up in the government’s face before too long.

 

Unless Labor gets with the program, Albanese will face the sort of bruising Oval Office encounter experienced by Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky and South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa when he finally clinches that White House sit-down.

 

That would be devastating for the bilateral relationship and for Albanese’s own leadership.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/anthony-albanese-penny-wong-too-slow-to-back-iran-strikes/news-story/b530cfc28775f7fea4bb170e67d6e3fc

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 23, 2025, 2:28 a.m. No.23224370   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2165

>>23218742

>>23224342

Albanese doesn’t want a bar of Middle East conflict, but that comes at a cost

 

James Massola - June 23, 2025

 

Anthony Albanese’s government appears more distant than ever from the Trump administration following the United States’ decision to join Israel in bombing Iranian nuclear facilities.

 

On the face of it, nothing much has changed. Albanese, joined by Penny Wong, announced Australia’s support for US strikes on Monday morning because “the world has long agreed that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon and we support action to prevent that”.

 

Make no mistake, there are small but subtle shifts under way in the US-Australia relationship now that Donald Trump is back in the White House. The fact he has not met Albanese face to face surely has not helped.

 

Whatever you think about Trump – and a solid majority of Australians don’t like him one bit – the US remains our major military and strategic partner. It is (probably) still selling us submarines under the AUKUS deal, which the government views as crucial to Australia’s self-defence.

 

So it mattered when Albanese curtly pointed out to journalists three times on Monday that the US decision to bomb Iran was unilateral, all but confirming Australia had not been briefed ahead of time by the US. British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer got a heads-up.

 

Last week, when Albanese was asked if Australia could send a ship to the Middle East in support of the US, he gave a categorical “no”. That answer made clear the prime minister’s view of Australia’s potential entanglement in the fight: he doesn’t see a need for it in this age of “progressive patriotism”.

 

It was strange, then, that Albanese appeared almost annoyed in his press conference that he had been left out of the loop on the US decision to strike even as he confirmed that “we aren’t a central player in this conflict – that’s just a fact.”

 

When the prime minister was asked for a third time why the federal government had waited 24 hours before expressing unequivocal support for the US bombing, he bit back. “We issued a statement,” he deadpanned.

 

The Sunday statement came from a government spokesperson, not from the prime minister or the foreign minister, nor from either of their offices, which in itself was a deliberate decision to downplay its significance.

 

“We have been clear that Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security,” the statement read. “We note the US President’s statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy.”

 

There’s nothing wrong with that statement, but it is not in any way the same as Albanese’s declaration of support for the US on Monday.

 

The kicker? Albanese also confirmed he has still not spoken to Trump since the cancelled G7 meeting in Canada last week.

 

Ahead of Albanese’s formal support of the US action, Wong had declared it on ABC’s News Breakfast program (before the National Security Council had met) and also appeared on radio 5AA, Sunrise, Today and ABC radio’s AM program, just in case you missed her.

 

It’s worth considering how a former prime minister such as John Howard, Tony Abbott or Scott Morrison might have handled the situation from the time Israel’s bombing began.

 

There is a decent chance that all three men would have volunteered to send an Australian naval vessel or an air-to-air refuelling plane to the region before being asked. Not that the United States actually needs the assistance – it’s just what Australia has always done.

 

Like the UK’s Sir Keir Starmer on this occasion, Howard would have probably received a phone call because Australia would have had forces in the region, rather than waiting more than 24 hours to respond to one of the most serious hot-war escalations in the Middle East in decades.

 

Howard or Abbott would have been out early, already briefed and proclaiming that Australia stands shoulder to shoulder with the US.

 

Again, this is not to criticise the current government’s response. For every Australian who wants us to be in lock-step with the United States on every decision, without hesitation, there is another who loathes our close alliance with the United States and longs for a more independent Australian foreign policy.

 

Like a Rorschach test, some Australians will be pleased the government didn’t immediately back the actions of the US government; others will be alarmed and see evidence of a somewhat frayed alliance.

 

Whatever your view, Labor’s approach to the latest round of conflict in the Middle East has marked a different emphasis and intent in Australia’s strategy.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/albanese-doesn-t-want-a-bar-of-middle-east-conflict-but-that-comes-at-a-cost-20250623-p5m9gb.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 23, 2025, 2:33 a.m. No.23224374   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2167

>>23203273

>>23218742

>>23224342

Iranian ambassador says US military bases could be targeted after strikes

 

Andrew Probyn - Jun 23, 2025

 

Exclusive: Iran's ambassador to Australia has warned Donald Trump's "act of animosity" in ordering the bombing of Iranian nuclear sites could see US military bases targeted and a key sealane closed.

 

In an exclusive interview with 9News, Ahmad Sadeghi said the US president had proved himself to be the "puppet" of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for which there would be "consequences".

 

"Islamic countries all around the world would consider this (an) act of animosity and they won't be silent inside the region," Sadeghi said.

 

"The US does have personnel and bases, either in southern part of the Persian Gulf or other regions in the West Asia, that they have bases.

 

"The other (consequence) is, you know, the ramification on the Persian Gulf from the navigation and just transfer of energy in the region."

 

A fifth of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz and its closure would see fuel prices skyrocket.

 

Sadeghi said Australia, as a peace-loving country, should "support justice and legality" and not side with the US.

 

"We are friendly with Australia. We do not have any sort of animosity with them," he said.

 

"What we have to do is just remind them, what is the real situation on the ground, and just remove the misunderstanding, because Iran's nuclear program has been legal and has been a peaceful, neutral program."

 

Asked if Iran was enriching uranium to near-weapons grade quality, Sadeghi said, "of course not".

 

"The Director General of IAEA Rafael Grossi is responsible in this bloodshed," he said.

 

"IAEA inspectors had maximum access to Iran.

 

"Iran was unique in terms of accepting inspection. Therefore, Mr Grossi had a very bad failure in that regard."

 

Sadeghi said Iran did not believe that the US wants regime change.

 

"When it comes to our country, the people are consolidated and united inside Iran to protect their country, and they protect their government."

 

https://www.9news.com.au/national/us-iran-conflict-iranian-ambassador-says-us-military-bases-could-be-targeted-after-strikes/e1569028-7aa4-4850-88f3-ffeebd9d8d24

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMgFqRodOAk

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 23, 2025, 2:56 a.m. No.23224390   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4392 >>2167

>>23218742

Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

 

Saeed Shah - June 21, 2025

 

ISLAMABAD, June 21 (Reuters) - Pakistan said on Saturday it would recommend U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that he has said he craves, for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between India and Pakistan.

 

Some analysts in Pakistan said the move might persuade Trump to think again about potentially joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has condemned Israel's action as a violation of international law and a threat to regional stability.

 

In May, a surprise announcement by Trump of a ceasefire brought an abrupt end to a four-day conflict between nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan. Trump has since repeatedly said that he averted a nuclear war, saved millions of lives, and grumbled that he got no credit for it.

 

Pakistan agrees that U.S. diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries.

 

"President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation," Pakistan said. "This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker."

 

Governments can nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize. There was no immediate response from Washington. A spokesperson for the Indian government did not respond to a request for comment.

 

Trump has repeatedly said that he's willing to mediate between India and Pakistan over the disputed Kashmir region, their main source of enmity. Islamabad, which has long called for international attention to Kashmir, is delighted.

 

But his stance has upended U.S. policy in South Asia, which had favored India as a counterweight to China, and put in question previously close relations between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

 

In a social media post on Friday, Trump gave a long list of conflicts he said he had resolved, including India and Pakistan and the Abraham accords in his first term between Israel and some Muslim-majority countries. He added: "I won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do."

 

Pakistan's move to nominate Trump came in the same week its army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met the U.S. leader for lunch. It was the first time that a Pakistani military leader had been invited to the White House when a civilian government was in place in Islamabad.

 

Trump's planned meeting with Modi at the G7 summit in Canada last week did not take place after the U.S. president left early, but the two later spoke by phone, in which Modi said "India does not and will never accept mediation" in its dispute with Pakistan, according to the Indian government.

 

Mushahid Hussain, a former chair of the Senate Defence Committee in Pakistan’s parliament, suggested nominating Trump for the peace prize was justified.

 

"Trump is good for Pakistan," he said. "If this panders to Trump’s ego, so be it. All the European leaders have been sucking up to him big time."

 

But the move was not universally applauded in Pakistan, where Trump's support for Israel's war in Gaza has inflamed passions.

 

"Israel's sugar daddy in Gaza and cheerleader of its attacks on Iran isn't a candidate for any prize," said Talat Hussain, a prominent Pakistani television political talk show host, in a post on X. “And what if he starts to kiss Modi on both cheeks again after a few months?"

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/pakistan-nominate-trump-nobel-peace-prize-2025-06-21/

 

https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/posts/114717932061341718

 

https://x.com/TalatHussain12/status/1936164423040704908

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 23, 2025, 3:02 a.m. No.23224392   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2167

>>23218742

>>23224390

Pakistan condemns Trump's bombing of Iran - a day after nominating him for Peace Prize

 

Saeed Shah - June 23, 2025

 

ISLAMABAD, June 22 (Reuters) - Pakistan condemned on Sunday the strikes ordered on its neighbour Iran by Donald Trump, a day after Islamabad had said it would nominate the U.S. President for the Nobel Peace Prize.

 

Pakistan on Sunday said Trump's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities violated international law and that diplomacy was the only way to resolve the Iran crisis.

 

“The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran is deeply disturbing. Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond,” Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said.

 

Also on Sunday, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif telephoned Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and “conveyed Pakistan’s condemnation of the U.S. attacks," a statement from the Pakistani leader said.

 

Pakistan’s information minister and the foreign ministry did not respond to requests for comment on the apparent contradiction in the country’s positions over the weekend.

 

In Pakistan’s biggest city, Karachi, thousands marched in protest against the U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran.

 

A large American flag with a picture of Trump on it was placed on the road for demonstrators to walk over. The protesters shouted out chants against America, Israel and Pakistan’s regional enemy India.

 

Pakistan on Saturday said it was nominating Trump as "a genuine peacemaker" for his role in bringing a four-day conflict with India to an end last month. It said he had “demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship”.

 

https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/pakistan-condemns-trumps-bombing-iran-day-after-nominating-him-peace-prize-2025-06-22/

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 24, 2025, 2:27 a.m. No.23230111   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0113 >>4836 >>2169

>>23218742

>>23224342

Anthony Albanese rejects he was ‘flat-footed’ responding to US strikes on Iran; defends NATO no-show

 

NOAH YIM - 24 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese has dismissed criticism that he was “flat-footed” in his response to the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, with the public only hearing from the Prime Minister 24 hours after the attack had happened.

 

Mr Albanese said criticism came from “the usual suspects” and that “there are some in the media who have a criticism of anything that the Labor government does”.

 

“What my government does is act in an orderly, coherent way,” he told Sky News on Tuesday. “And we were very clear for some period of time that Iran could not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon.

 

“We called for Iran to come to the table to ensure that the United States wouldn’t have to take the action which they did. The action that they took, we made clear that we supported action that would ensure that Iran couldn’t gain that nuclear weapon.”

 

Mr Albanese reiterated that he wanted “to see … the ceasefire announced by President Trump implemented”.

 

The Prime Minister also stood by his decision not to attend the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation summit in The Netherlands, despite reports Donald Trump was seeking a meeting with Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand at the summit.

 

The Prime Minister said “three of the four” IP4 (Indo-Pacific 4) leaders would not be at the summit and that it was “appropriate” that Defence Minister Richard Marles attended instead.

 

Mr Albanese said Australia and the US had agreed Mr Albanese and Mr Trump would “have a meeting and that will take place at a time that’s convenient for both of us”.

 

“The President of Korea is not there, the Prime Minister of Japan is not there,” Mr Albanese said. “In terms of the IP4, three of the four leaders aren’t there.

 

“That was a part of the decision-making process that we made. NATO is about NATO. It’s about all of the countries that are a part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. Of course it is appropriate that the Defence Minister attend the meeting.”

 

Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba was due to attend the meeting, but local media reported on Tuesday morning Australian time that he had cancelled the trip.

 

Mr Albanese dismissed a suggestion that if Mr Marles were to meet with Mr Trump at NATO in coming days, it would show the Prime Minister “could have also got that face-to-face time”.

 

“I’ve been to the United States on five separate occasions … as Prime Minister,” he said. “And I do note that the same people who constantly say I should do more international travel every time I do are critical.”

 

He reiterated the government backs “Israel’s right to defend itself” after the escalation of war in the past few weeks, but also that “there is a need to resolve the Palestinian question”.

 

“We want to see the right of Israelis to live in secure borders in Israel,” the Prime Minister told Sky News. “We also want to see the legitimate aspirations of the Palestinian people fulfilled and we want to see peace and security in the region (that) has been a source of global instability for a long period of time.”

 

Mr Albanese was asked whether he supported Israel’s “right to strike Iran recently as well”.

 

“We support Israel’s right to defend itself,” he said. “What we say, we haven’t been uncritical of Israel where we believe that the actions have not been consistent.

 

“We, for example, continue to call for support for aid to go into Gaza at the same time of course as we call for the hostages to be released.”

 

Mr Albanese said there had been no change in the national security situation after warnings Iran may activate “sleeper cells” in Western countries such as the US and Australia in retaliation to the US strike on Iran’s nuclear sites.

 

“It is constantly monitored, but there’s been no change in the national security alert,” the Prime Minister told Sky News. “We continue to have our national security agencies to monitor the situation.”

 

PM welcomes ceasefire push

 

Earlier on Tuesday, Mr Albanese welcomed Mr Trump’s announcement of an imminent ceasefire between Israel and Iran.

 

Mr Trump’s announcement came hours after Iran launched strikes against an American military base in Qatar – retaliation for US strikes over the weekend against Iranian nuclear sites.

 

In response, Mr Albanese issued a statement on Tuesday morning.

 

“We have consistently called for dialogue, diplomacy and de-escalation,” the Prime Minister said. “The safety of Australians in the region is our priority.

 

“We continue to closely monitor the situation in the Middle East and are deeply concerned about keeping Australians safe.”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 24, 2025, 2:29 a.m. No.23230113   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23230111

 

2/2

 

Fears of ‘devastating’ Middle East war

 

Penny Wong earlier warned Australians that Iran could strike targets outside the Middle East in response to US ­attacks on its nuclear sites, amid revelations Tehran threatened to activate sleeper cells to carry out terrorist attacks on American soil.

 

The Foreign Minister on Tuesday condemned Iran’s strikes on US bases in Qatar and Iraq, warned about the devastating consequences of a “full-scale war” in the region and urged de-escalation.

 

Senator Wong said her department was reconsidering its travel advice for Australians as the ­nation’s intelligence agencies ­assessed the possibility of domestic terror threats arising from the conflict.

 

Australians urged to watch for travel advice

 

Speaking after a meeting of the cabinet’s national security committee on Monday morning, ­Senator Wong urged Australians abroad to watch for updated travel warnings.

 

“Obviously there are always risks, not only from escalation in the region, but also potential for risk more broadly,” the Foreign Minister said.

 

Australia’s terrorism threat level remains at “probable”, where it has been since last August, when it was raised from “possible”.

 

There are two higher threat levels that can be invoked should the circumstances demand it – “expected” and “certain”.

 

Mr Albanese said threat assessments were being made on an ongoing basis.

 

“We are constantly under a position where the ASIO director-general and our security intelligence agencies are constantly engaged in monitoring. There’s been no change in any of the advice that has been issued,” the Prime Minister said.

 

ANU terrorism expert Levi West said it was “highly likely” Iran would attempt to hit back at the US using its proxy network of terrorist groups and supporters.

 

“We would expect Iran, both in their strategic thinking and their strategic doctrine, to use whatever proxies they can, and that will range from their intelligence services directly, all the way through to actors who barely even realise that they’re working on behalf of the Iranians, to engage in a very wide array of activities, including terrorism,” Dr West said.

 

He said Hezbollah had been Iran’s foremost proxy force before it was decimated by Israeli attacks in Lebanon, undermining its ability to mount wider operations.

 

“The capacity of a group like Hezbollah to do what it could have done 12 months ago, both in the region and beyond, will be significantly less than it was,” Dr West said. “That’s not to say it is nothing, but most of the senior leadership has been decimated, and that has an enormous impact on a terrorist organisation.”

 

He said the risk of attacks in Australia arising from the conflict was “probably relatively low”.

 

“I would be very surprised if we saw a change in the threat level,” he said. “This is more like conventional state versus state. Yes, Iran has got a proxy network, but that’s been hammered over the past 12 months, two years. And I think they’d be looking for bigger-ticket responses.”

 

ASIO director-general Mike Burgess said this year that Iran was one of “at least three or four” countries involved in foreign interference in Australia’s diaspora communities. Former Defence Department deputy secretary Peter Jennings said Mr Burgess had been clear that it was not “just China” engaging in espionage and asymmetric warfare, and Iranian sleeper agents could be anyone from university students to government officials.

 

“You might plant an agent into a country for a period of five, 10, 15 years and they work themselves into jobs and positions that might be useful from the point of view of some type of sabotage operation,” he said. “When the moment arrives, they’re activated and told to go off and do what you’re trained to do … ASIO would certainly be taking it seriously and they would definitely be aware of intelligence activities of the Iranian embassy in Canberra.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/experts-warn-of-wider-reprisal-attacks-after-us-act-of-animosity/news-story/7c28c1009ccb55ee7602525fc1b0eebb

 

https://x.com/SenatorWong/status/1937260429195247793

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 24, 2025, 2:43 a.m. No.23230126   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0131 >>2169

>>23218742

>>23224342

COMMENTARY: PM’s confusion, passivity and weakness has made us irrelevant

 

GREG SHERIDAN - 24 June 2025

 

1/2

 

It is difficult to think of a time when Australia has been so inconsequential, so powerless, so much without influence, so incapable of affecting its own destiny or anyone else’s, as we have become under the Albanese government.

 

The truly astonishing performance on the question of the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities is a classic case.

 

It seems at one level eccentric, even for an Australian, to focus on the performance of the government in Canberra when the world is gripped by crisis in the Middle East and has so many other crises to be going on with.

 

Critical events will unfold over the next few weeks. Exactly how will Iran frame its response to the US actions? Does it really want more kinetic conflict with the US, or will its actions be more gesture and performance?

 

Donald Trump’s position is fascinating. A stubborn minority of his MAGA base – particularly Tucker Carlson and Steve Bannon – bitterly opposes the strikes. This is unlikely to trouble Trump in the short term. Congressional Republicans will back him overwhelmingly.

 

But does the internal division within MAGA constrain the President in the future?

 

What next for Israel? When will it exhaust meaningful targets in Iran? Can Israel replenish its missile interceptor stocks quickly enough to continue to provide general safety to its citizens?

 

What will be the approach of Iran’s nuclear weapons possessing strategic partners, namely Russia, North Korea and China? Dimitry Medvedev, a former president of Russia and still influential in Vladimir Putin’s reign, said several nations would willingly supply nuclear weapons to Iran. He also seemed to cast off all pretence that Iran’s nuclear program was exclusively for peaceful purposes, saying the future production of nuclear weapons would be unaffected by US strikes.

 

It’s unlikely Russia would give nuclear warheads to Iran. Moscow has always had great concern about Islamic nukes too close to its borders. But these are strange words from Medvedev. Iran has received help on its nuclear program from Russia and China in the past.

 

So as all these giant issues roil the international environment, it may seem strange to focus on the follies of Canberra.

 

But we are Australians after all, and we have to worry deeply about our government.

 

There was a marvellous 1959 comedy with Peter Sellers called The Mouse That Roared, about a tiny nation that became unexpectedly powerful and didn’t have a clue what to do. Under the Albanese government, Australia has become The Mouse That Doesn’t Even Squeak, has no power at all and also doesn’t have a clue what to do.

 

Consider the absolute weird lameness of the government’s response to the US’s actions. They happened on Sunday morning our time and every sentient being on the planet knew about them and had a view. Not the Albanese government. It put out one of its characteristic non-statements.

 

In diplomacy there is a thing called a non-paper. Our government specialises in non-statements, designed to show that it’s roughly aware something is going on but doesn’t have the faintest idea what its view of it is.

 

Albanese has no relationship to speak of with Trump. Australia in modern times has seldom been less influential on, or less inside the thinking of, Washington. Britain was informed of the US actions in advance. Naturally, Australia was not.

 

We live on the capital of the goodwill of our past and the continued relevance of our geography. But Australia would be just as relevant strategically if it were a colony of penguins.

 

Then on Monday, through gritted teeth, came government statements saying Australia supported the US actions in Iran because it was important to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. The Albanese government got to the right position but, characteristically, only after exhausting all other alternatives.

 

The statement and the unbearably stilted, constipated, almost pre-AI robotic performance at the press conference were frankly a national embarrassment.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 24, 2025, 2:45 a.m. No.23230131   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23230126

 

2/2

 

This column has noted before that Albanese has the greatest difficulty in any national security conversation moving beyond his approved talking points and sticks mechanically to whatever form of words he has been given.

 

Thus a questioner said: “Why did it take until Monday to form the view that we supported the American action?” Albanese replied: “We put out a statement yesterday.” But the statement on Sunday didn’t offer support. So, as with virtually all the other questions, Albanese simply refused to answer.

 

The ridiculous rule at PM press conferences now is that journalists can’t ask follow-up questions, so the PM just refuses to answer and moves on to the next questioner. It’s utterly embarrassing and of course an insult to the normal workings of liberal democracy.

 

Foreign Minister Penny Wong, who remains the only member of the national security team who can normally mount any kind of argument, was asked in that same press conference whether she regarded the US actions as legal within international law. She didn’t answer. She was asked the same question on the ABC and again didn’t answer, referring to Australia’s opposition to Iran’s nuclear program but not answering the question on the legality of US actions.

 

I put the same inquiry to the Foreign Minister’s office and was referred to the non-answer on the ABC. This is frankly pathetic. No one is asking the Australian government to be the final arbiter on all questions of international law. It has an absolutely unavoidable responsibility, however, to judge whether its own actions and positions comply with international law.

 

Presumably, the Albanese government wouldn’t support actions it regards as illegal. It supports the US action. Therefore it must regard the US action as legal.

 

So why on earth will it not say that? The government constantly behaves like a rabbit startled in a spotlight, unable to move forwards or backwards.

 

Its structural contradiction is that it wants to preserve the US alliance and all the benefits that come to Australia from that, but it is a government dominated by the Labor Left, perpetually scared of internal rebellion and terrified of losing votes to the Greens domestically. It’s a government without any apparent moral or strategic compass.

 

Here’s another question. If the government supports the US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, why did it not support similar Israeli strikes? Under international law, Israel has a stronger case that it has been repeatedly attacked by Iran and faces imminent danger from Iran. Principle anyone? Consistency?

 

Albanese was very lucky he didn’t go to NATO. Imagine trying to get an appointment with Trump so you can whine about tariffs while all this is happening. And what about the embarrassment that NATO now wants member states to spend 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence while we spend a pitiful 2 per cent?

 

Nobody sane could argue that the Albanese government is responding effectively to the strategic challenges we face.

 

Dumb luck may not guarantee our future.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/pms-confusion-passivity-and-weakness-has-made-us-irrelevant/news-story/45a7b23b4a2ac25aba3d35aee23e26ef

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 24, 2025, 3:07 a.m. No.23230188   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4836 >>4869 >>8447 >>2230

>>23192221

>>23218742

>>23224342

Chalmers to push tariffs case on Trump team, still no meeting for Albanese

 

Nick Bonyhady - June 24, 2025

 

Treasurer Jim Chalmers will attempt to ward off tariffs and massive taxes on Australian superannuation funds investing in the US when he speaks to his American counterpart on Wednesday as the prime minister defends his absence from a key NATO meeting.

 

Anthony Albanese has sent Defence Minister Richard Marles to the NATO summit in the Netherlands this week, where Trump had reportedly hoped to meet with the prime minister and other Asia-Pacific leaders.

 

The prime minister has not met Trump face to face more than five months into the US leader’s second presidency, spurring demands from Opposition Leader Sussan Ley that Albanese attend the NATO gathering to make up for his cancelled meeting with Trump at the G7 in Canada.

 

“Now is the time for Australia to stand with the United States, our allies and like-minded countries,” Ley said. “The prime minister should be taking every opportunity to do so.”

 

But Albanese said other world leaders, including the president of South Korea and prime minister of Japan, were not at NATO despite reports Trump hoped to meet with them as a bloc and suggested his critics were being hypocritical.

 

“I’ve been to the United States on five separate occasions … as prime minister,” Albanese said on Sky News on Tuesday. “And I do note that the same people who constantly say I should do more international travel, every time I do, are critical of it as well.”

 

Albanese’s planned meeting with Trump at the G7 this month was billed as a chance for him to build rapport with the president and make the case for the AUKUS nuclear submarines program and better treatment for Australian exporters and investors in the US.

 

But the meeting was cancelled when Trump returned to Washington to deal with the situation in the Middle East, and the president did not call Albanese despite doing so for other world leaders who also missed out.

 

Australian goods entering the United States are subject to a 10 per cent tariff, as are most other countries’ exports.

 

Congress is also considering legislation that would impose extra taxes of up to 20 per cent on investors from countries that it deems have anticompetitive laws, which could include Australia’s pharmaceutical benefits scheme.

 

Superannuation funds have more than $400 billion of Australians’ retirement savings invested in the US.

 

Chalmers said on Tuesday he would speak to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent about the legislation Congress is considering, as well as trade, tariffs, critical minerals and the global economy.

 

“This will be an opportunity to engage once again on issues which are central to this very important economic relationship between the United States and Australia,” Chalmers said.

 

The treasurer also invited Ted O’Brien, the shadow treasurer, to a round table on economic reform he is hosting with union, business and community groups in August.

 

“I think it would give us a better chance of making the kind of progress that we desperately need to see on reform and in our economy more broadly,” Chalmers said on Tuesday.

 

O’Brien said he had accepted the offer. “The Coalition will be constructive where we can and critical where we must, and I will engage in a business-like fashion,” he said. “The Coalition will hold the government to account every step of the way and won’t be there to rubber-stamp a talkfest.”

 

https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/chalmers-to-push-tariffs-case-on-trump-team-still-no-meeting-for-albanese-20250624-p5m9yq.html

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 24, 2025, 3:34 a.m. No.23230223   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0227 >>2250

>>23145527

>>23145597

>>23145628

Royal Children’s Hospital board must not ignore judge’s trans case findings

 

Patrick Parkinson - 24 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Justice Andrew Strum, who recently decided the case of Re Devin, was so concerned about the evidence he heard from a clinician at the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne he prohibited a mother from taking her son back to its gender service unless the father agreed.

 

Justice Strum also considered it in the public interest to name one of the experts, the hospital’s chief of medicine, Michelle Telfer, who has been Australia’s foremost leader in promoting what some call “gender-affirming care”.

 

In the way the best judges do, he delivered a carefully reasoned explanation about why he found the RCH’s practices so disturbing, based on the trial evidence that had lasted four weeks.

 

At the heart of his concerns was that Telfer – and the other expert witness who was identified only as a “senior clinical psychologist” – did not offer the court a coherent justification for their clinical practice. Telfer and the senior clinical psychologist, the judge noted, believe gender identity is “internal and immutable” and not open to external influence. But he observed “neither of those experts were able to point to any empirical or substantive basis for their opinion but, rather, only to anecdotal reports from transgender adults”.

 

According to Justice Strum, Telfer made assertions that seemed to contradict the idea that a child’s gender identity is immutable. Neither clinician could say at what age children have the capacity to know their “true” gender identity, but both were confident that in this case the child could do so when he was only six years old.

 

The questions raised by Justice Strum are important. At the heart of the issue is whether a young person’s gender identity is innate and immutable. The RCH’s own published data shows 25 per cent of its young patients have had eating disorders and 45 per cent have autistic traits. This is consistent with research elsewhere. Many of these young people seeking medical treatment from gender clinics have had adverse childhood experiences, including child abuse and family breakdown. Insisting these factors are quite independent of the young person’s identification as “trans” seems to fly in the face of all the evidence.

 

Judges are sometimes critical of expert witnesses, but this was much more than criticism about some details. Justice Strum expressed concern about the basis of the RCH’s practices. If gender identity in children is not immutable – and the overwhelming evidence from research is that it is not – why would we put primary school children on a pathway to irreversible modifications of their sex characteristics?

 

We might do that if the evidence of benefit is overwhelming and the risks of not treating are grave. But one systematic review after another across the world has been unable to find such evidence. The consensus is, the evidence to support the benefits of prescribing puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones to minors is very weak. Without puberty blockers, the majority of children seen at specialist gender clinics have resolved their gender incongruence before, or during, puberty.

 

This month a high-profile study in the US, led by a well-known proponent of gender-affirming care, Jo Olson-Kennedy, found no mental health benefits from puberty blockers. Yet at the time they entered the study, before receiving puberty blockers, 28.6 per cent of these children reported elevated depression symptoms and 22 per cent had clinically significant anxiety.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 24, 2025, 3:37 a.m. No.23230227   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2250

>>23230223

 

2/2

 

After an experienced and highly respected judge has so strongly criticised the hospital’s chief of medicine, and called into question the clinical practices at its gender service, one might expect the chief executive or the board to announce the hospital was treating the issues raised with the utmost seriousness. In a similar situation, other hospital boards might well have announced a formal independent inquiry.

 

Instead, the hospital released a statement saying its gender service delivers a “world-leading, multidisciplinary model of care”.

 

Really? The RCH did not go on to explain which countries are following its lead. In Britain, after the landmark Cass review, the Labour government has banned the use of puberty blockers for the treatment of gender dysphoria outside a clinical trial. In Scandinavia and elsewhere, governments have taken a restrictive approach to puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones for minors, preferring a psychotherapeutic approach in the first instance. The treatment is banned or restricted in 25 US states and, this month, these laws were upheld as constitutional by the US Supreme Court in US v Skrmetti.

 

Last month, this newspaper revealed that the gender service’s treatment protocol had not been approved by the RCH’s new technology and clinical practice committee in the normal way. A prerequisite for approval by that committee is that “evidence of efficacy and clinical effectiveness must exist”.

 

The Australian’s report indicates the committee was not provided with such evidence.

 

The RCH’s reputation is on the line. The situation in Victoria is no doubt complicated by the position of its government, which has championed the practices of the RCH gender service and incorporated the underlying beliefs of the transgender movement into its educational policies and programs.

 

But this is an issue about whether the RCH is practising evidence-based medicine. It is also a child protection issue, for the consequences of providing unnecessary and irreversible treatments to children, with such adverse and lifelong effects, could be grave. This is a board responsibility now. It must not shirk it.

 

Patrick Parkinson is emeritus professor of law at the University of Queensland.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/commentary/royal-childrens-board-must-not-ignore-judges-trans-case-findings/news-story/c18ddb1396d7f54453c1fe270140f9e9

 

 

U.S. Study on Puberty Blockers Goes Unpublished Because of Politics, Doctor Says

 

The leader of the long-running study said that the drugs did not improve mental health in children with gender distress and that the finding might be weaponized by opponents of the care.

 

Azeen Ghorayshi - Oct. 23, 2024

 

https://archive.is/20250107012809/https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/23/science/puberty-blockers-olson-kennedy.html

 

https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/1849207760463757564

 

https://reporter.nih.gov/search/OPTb_4f5-kOe2wU2YYzolA/project-details/10615754#outcomes

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 25, 2025, 2:40 a.m. No.23234829   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4833 >>2170

>>23218742

>>23224342

Trump scolds Israel and Iran as he accuses both of violating ceasefire

 

Michael Koziol - June 25, 2025

 

1/2

 

Washington: US President Donald Trump has unleashed a tirade on Israel for violating his ceasefire, saying both it and Iran “don’t know what the f*ck they’re doing” in an unprecedented display of rage at a close American ally.

 

Trump had declared a ceasefire between the two enemy states at 6pm on Monday, US time, saying it would start at midnight and end a conflict that has raged since Israel launched missiles at Iran in the early hours of June 13.

 

But in short order, both sides were accusing each other of violating the deal. A statement from the office of Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, reported by The Times of Israel, said Israel “attacked forcefully in the heart of Tehran” hours before the ceasefire started, killing “hundreds of Basij and Iranian security forces”.

 

The statement also said a barrage of Iranian missiles then killed four Israeli citizens in Beersheba, a city in the Negev desert in southern Israel, just before the truce was due to begin.

 

Leaving the White House for the NATO summit in the Netherlands early Tuesday morning, US time, Trump said he had watched coverage of the ceasefire on television all night and was deeply disappointed in the violations, particularly from Israel.

 

“I think they both violated it. I’m not sure they did it intentionally, they couldn’t rein people back,” he said before boarding a military helicopter.

 

“I don’t like the fact that Israel went out this morning at all. As soon as I can get away from you, I’m going to see if I can stop it,” Trump told reporters.

 

“Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs the likes of which I’ve never seen before. The biggest load that we’ve seen.

 

“I’m not happy with Israel. When I say, ‘OK now you have 12 hours’, you don’t go out in the first hour and just drop everything you have on them. So I’m not happy with them. I’m not happy with Iran either.”

 

Unprompted, Trump added: “We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the f*ck they’re doing. Do you understand that?”

 

Netanyahu’s office brushed aside the criticism, saying in the aforementioned statement that Trump expressed his appreciation for Israel during a phone call with Netanyahu, along with his confidence in the stability of the ceasefire.

 

“Following President Trump’s conversation with Prime Minister Netanyahu, Israel refrained from additional attacks,” Netanyahu’s office said.

 

Later, aboard Air Force One bound for Europe, Trump struck a more conciliatory tone, and thanked Netanyahu for showing restraint.

 

“Israel, as you know, turned back. They didn’t do that raid this morning, fortunately. That was a big thing - [I] appreciate it,” Trump said.

 

“They had a lot of planes going, and they were going to do something, and they didn’t do it, and we’re happy about that … The ceasefire is very much in effect, and I think we’re going to keep it there for a long time.”

 

Later, he declared mission accomplished in a Truth Social post from the plane: “Both Israel and Iran wanted to stop the War, equally! It was my great honor to Destroy All Nuclear facilities & capability, and then, STOP THE WAR!”

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 25, 2025, 2:42 a.m. No.23234833   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23234829

 

2/2

 

But the president’s fiery earlier rhetoric was not limited to Israel and Iran. He also lashed out at the major US news networks for what he said was poor coverage of American strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities on the weekend.

 

Trump insists the sites were destroyed and is unhappy that journalists are querying the extent of the damage, which is yet to be formally confirmed by the Pentagon or the international nuclear watchdog.

 

“All night long they’re trying to say: well, maybe it wasn’t really as demolished as we thought,” Trump said. “It was demolished. You take a look at the pinpricks, and you see: that place is gone.”

 

“CNN ought to apologise to the pilots of the B-2s [bomber planes]. I think MSDNC ought to apologise,” Trump said, referring to MSNBC, a left-of-centre channel.

 

“These guys, these networks and these cable networks, are real losers. You really are. You’re real losers. You’re gutless losers. I say that to CNN because I watch it - I have no choice, I’ve got to watch that garbage, it’s all garbage, it’s all fake news.”

 

Hours later, CNN revealed that a Defense Intelligence Agency report on the US bombing operation characterised the damage done as partial, and that core components of Iran’s nuclear program were not destroyed.

 

CNN cited four sources briefed on the report, one of whom said Iran’s nuclear ambitions had been set back “maybe a few months, tops”.

 

In a statement to this masthead sent by the Pentagon, Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth stood by his earlier assessment that the bombing campaign obliterated Iran’s nuclear ambitions. But he conceded evidence was buried under the rubble.

 

“Based on everything we have seen – and I’ve seen it all – our bombing campaign obliterated Iran’s ability to create nuclear weapons,” Hegseth said.

 

“Our massive bombs hit exactly the right spot at each target – and worked perfectly. The impact of those bombs is buried under a mountain of rubble in Iran; so anyone who says the bombs were not devastating is just trying to undermine the president and the successful mission.”

 

The White House dismissed the intelligence assessment as “wrong”, and said it was leaked by “an anonymous low-level loser” in the intelligence community.

 

The president arrived at the NATO summit on Tuesday evening, local time, and attended a social dinner with other world leaders hosted by King Willem-Alexander and Queen Máxima. He will then participate in official sessions on Wednesday and return home to Washington that evening.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/trump-scolds-israel-and-iran-as-he-accuses-both-of-violating-ceasefire-20250624-p5ma18.html

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fmrEfW7lEI

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 25, 2025, 2:44 a.m. No.23234836   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4844 >>2231

>>23192221

>>23230111

>>23230188

PM cannot say when he’ll meet Donald Trump

 

Phillip Coorey - Jun 24, 2025

 

Anthony Albanese says his decision to not attend this week’s NATO summit in The Hague, which may have included a meeting with Donald Trump, was driven by other Indo-Pacific leaders also opting to miss the event.

 

Defence Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles will represent Australia at the summit and, while he refused to speculate whether he might break the ice by having an audience with the US president, government sources said it was highly unlikely.

 

With Trump using the summit to pressure the 32 European members to lift their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP, the US wants Australia to lift its spending from the current rate of 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent “as soon as possible”.

 

Marles, if he meets Trump, is expected to echo the arguments Albanese made last week in Canada that Australia was pulling its weight because of the additional in-kind support provided to US forces operating out of Australian bases and ports.

 

On Monday, both the Reuters and Nikkei news agencies reported Trump wanted a standalone meeting in The Hague with the leaders of Australia, New Zealand, Japan and South Korea. These nations form a NATO-aligned group known as the IP4.

 

Late last week, after Trump cancelled a planned meeting with Albanese at the G7 summit in Canada, the prime minister considered attending the NATO summit, being held Tuesday and Wednesday this week, to try to catch up with the president there.

 

He decided against it on Friday. New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon is the only IP4 leader attending the NATO summit.

 

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Albanese should hop on a plane to The Hague if the reports about Trump wanting to meet the four leaders were true.

 

But Albanese pointed to the absence of Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba and South Korean President Lee Jae-myung, saying that contributed to his decision to not attend NATO.

 

“They’re not there. The president of Korea is not there. The prime minister of Japan is not there,” he said.

 

“In terms of the IP4, three of the four leaders aren’t there. That was a part of the decision-making process that we made. NATO is about NATO. It’s about all of the countries that are a part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation.”

 

Asked by Sky News on Tuesday when he might meet Trump, to whom he has only ever spoken by phone, Albanese was unsure.

 

“We have agreed that we will have a meeting and that will take place at a time that’s convenient for both of us. That will be a good thing,” he said.

 

Albanese is hoping to meet Trump in September when he travels to New York for the United Nations General Assembly.

 

After Trump cancelled last week’s meeting, Albanese secured a meeting with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trump’s principal economic adviser Kevin Hassett.

 

Treasurer Jim Chalmers will speak by phone to Bessent on Wednesday and continue to lobby him on tariffs.

 

Earlier this month, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte agreed for member nations to increase their spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, with the other 1.5 per cent made up of “defence-related expenditure”.

 

Spain, however, has rejected the 5 per cent target as “unreasonable”. The alliance operates on a consensus that requires the backing of all 32 members.

 

Trump lashed out at Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s government, saying: “NATO is going to have to deal with Spain. Spain’s been a very low payer.”

 

He also criticised Canada as “a low payer”.

 

Albanese is not opposed to sending more on defence but says Australia should decide its needs and fund them accordingly.

 

He did intend to tell Trump last week that his government had not only increased defence spending by $57 billion over the next decade, but was also providing the US with billions of dollars worth of in-kind support with “a range of benefits”.

 

He cited Australia’s $800 million contribution to enhance the production of submarines in the US, and the provision of more than 100 personnel, who will learn how to maintain the vessels at a base in Hawaii.

 

The prime minister also noted Australia’s commitment to upgrade the Henderson Naval Base in Western Australia to host US submarines from 2027 onwards.

 

“Henderson will be important in increasing the capacity of US submarines, as well as UK submarines, to be in the water for longer and for maintenance to occur there,” he said.

 

Albanese also pointed to the rotation of US marines and aircraft through Darwin and fuel reserves in the Northern Territory.

 

“[The] AUKUS pillar one is very much in Australia’s national interest, but it’s also in the interest of the United States.”

 

https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/pm-cannot-say-when-he-ll-meet-donald-trump-20250624-p5m9rk

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 25, 2025, 2:53 a.m. No.23234844   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4849 >>9557 >>9568 >>2231

>>23192221

>>23234836

Anthony Albanese faces date with Xi before Trump as Marles NATO meeting hopes fade

 

SARAH ISON and BEN PACKHAM - 24 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese could meet Xi Jinping for a fourth time before getting his first face-to-face talks with Donald Trump, amid preparations for a prime ministerial visit to Beijing around the middle of July.

 

While the government is scrambling to secure a meeting between the US President and Mr Albanese in Washington in the coming weeks, plans for the Beijing trip are well advanced and the Prime Minister could head to China first.

 

Meanwhile, world leaders have converged on The Hague for the NATO summit, with the NATO “family photo” mirroring the current gulf between the US and Australia on everything from defence spending to Middle East policy.

 

Hopes of a meeting between Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles and the US President faded after Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba cancelled plans to attend, scuttling a scheduled session with Mr Trump and NATO’s Indo-Pacific partners.

 

Multiple sources familiar with preparations for Mr Albanese’s China visit for the nations’ annual leaders’ talks were still waiting on final confirmation that the Prime Minister would proceed with the mid-July trip, despite the program having been largely finalised.

 

The Prime Minister’s office declined to provide any details, while senior government sources said securing the Trump meeting was the priority.

 

If those efforts failed and Mr Albanese headed to Beijing before Washington, it would underscore the current difficulties in the Australia-US relationship and potentially complicate his efforts to forge a personal relationship with Mr Trump, who is more hawkish on China than the Prime Minister.

 

Mr Trump has taken a hard line with Beijing, hitting it with punishing tariffs, halting semiconductor exports to China, and focusing US military power on preparing for a potential conflict with the Asian superpower.

 

The Albanese government has taken a different tack, stabilising Australia’s previously frayed ties with its biggest trading partner, adopting a “co-operate where we can, disagree where we must and engage in the national interest” mantra.

 

The Coalition said Mr Albanese could combine the China visit with a trip to Washington, arguing that the need for a meeting with Mr Trump was now urgent. ­Opposition foreign affairs spokeswoman Michaelia Cash said: “Mr Albanese should make every effort to meet with Mr Trump as soon as possible. As he will already be overseas, Mr Albanese has a golden opportunity to also travel to the United States in July and meet with President Trump. It is important that Mr ­Albanese reaffirms the importance of (the) AUKUS (security pact with the US and the UK) during these uncertain times and that he also puts our case for tariff ­exemptions.”

 

The Prime Minister has had three phone calls with Mr Trump, but the pair are yet to meet in ­person, with the President skipping their scheduled talks at the G7 summit in Canada this month due to the unfolding war in the Middle East.

 

Mr Albanese said the cancellation of the meeting was ­“understandable”, given the circumstances, but he notably missed out on a follow-up phone call – a courtesy extended to other world leaders who were stood up in person by the President, including India’s Narendra Modi and Mexico’s Claudia Sheinbaum.

 

Mr Albanese has met Mr Xi three times since he became Prime Minister: in November last year at the G20 summit in Rio de Janeiro; in November 2023 in Beijing; and at an icebreaking meeting in ­November 2022 at the G20 summit in Bali. It is China’s turn to host the countries’ leaders’ talks after ­Chinese Premier Li Qiang visited Australia in June last year for the meeting.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 25, 2025, 2:55 a.m. No.23234849   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23234844

 

2/2

 

The travel preparations came as Defence Minister Richard ­Marles prepared to face fresh US pressure at the NATO summit for America’s ­allies to spend more on defence.

 

There remains a possibility Mr Marles could get a meeting with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was expected to convene talks with NATO’s “Indo-Pacific Four”.

 

Any meeting with Mr Rubio would likely include a discussion of defence spending and the Trump administration’s snap 30-day review of AUKUS, which is due to be completed next month.

 

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth publicly called this month for Australia to increase its defence budget from its current 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent. In the March budget, the Albanese government only committed to an increase to 2.33 per cent.

 

Mr Hegseth’s move was followed soon after by a Pentagon announcement that AUKUS would be reviewed to ensure it was aligned with Mr Trump’s “America First” agenda.

 

Carnegie Endowment for International Peace vice-­president for studies Evan ­Feigenbaum warned in a paper this week that a “quiet crisis” was brewing in the Australia-US alliance.

 

The respected strategic analyst said the US would not let up on Australia over the nation’s defence budget.

 

“That is almost certainly why, on June 11, Pentagon officials leaked a story to the Financial Times that they are not only reviewing the submarine and technology partnership between Australia, the United Kingdom, and the United States but teased a linkage between the outcome of this review and Canberra’s next set of choices on defence spending,” Dr Feigenbaum wrote.

 

He said there was also a US ­expectation that Australia would commit to supporting the US in a potential conflict with China over Taiwan, but there was “no way” Canberra would do so.

 

Dr Feigenbaum said there were “inherently political” differences between the alliance partners.

 

“The back and forth between Hegseth and Albanese over the defence budget is a warning of what may come,” he said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/anthony-albanese-faces-date-withxi-jinping-before-ovaloffice-invite-from-donald-trump/news-story/6aac99964ea8cd73b96e25c6b67d1569

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 25, 2025, 3:04 a.m. No.23234869   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4872 >>8447 >>2232

>>23230188

Chalmers urges Bessent to reconsider ‘revenge tax’ on super funds

 

Michael Read and Lucas Baird - Jun 25, 2025

 

1/2

 

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has urged his US counterpart Scott Bessent to reconsider a controversial proposal that would raise taxes on super funds and companies investing in the US, as he pushed back on calls to increase Australia’s defence spending.

 

Institutional investors are alarmed by section 899 of the Trump administration’s so-called “big beautiful bill”. The proposed law would give the administration scope to use “revenge taxes” on foreign countries that it deemed treated American firms unfairly, such as through digital services taxes.

 

Australia could be in the firing line because of its news media bargaining incentive, which forces US tech giants to pay for local news shared on their platforms, and its adoption of the OECD’s global minimum corporate tax rate of 15 per cent.

 

While some Australian companies are hit with a 30 per cent withholding tax on income sourced from the US, section 899 would see this jump another 5 percentage points for each year unfair duties are imposed by another country for up to four years.

 

The bill would also remove the tax exemptions enjoyed by sovereign wealth funds and pension funds. That has alarmed players in the $4.2 trillion superannuation industry, which have almost $400 billion invested in the US, and generally do not pay capital gains tax from these investments.

 

Chalmers said he had a productive discussion with Bessent on Wednesday morning, where he raised Australian investors’ concerns about section 899.

 

“I know that there’s a lot of concern among our Australian institutional investors – super funds, the Future Fund and other institutions – when it comes to section 899 of the proposed so-called big beautiful bill in the US,” Chalmers said.

 

“I’ve engaged a lot with Australian investors over the course of the last couple of weeks on their concerns. I was able to represent them and raise their concerns directly with US Treasury Secretary Bessent.”

 

The section 899 rules were originally set to start from 2026, but the Senate last week pushed it out to January 1, 2027. They have alarmed the $4.2 trillion superannuation industry, which has built huge investment portfolios in the US and could face increased taxes that crimp returns to members.

 

MLC is one of the largest retail super funds, and its chief investment officer Dan Farmer said he was watching the bill cautiously.

 

“We’re assessing it on a case-by-case, pragmatic basis. Any new unlisted long-term private market investments we are committing to, we’re running an assessment about what section 899 means for those investments,” Farmer said.

 

“The impact of our assessment has not been as great as you might expect on many of our asset classes,” he added, namely the fund’s fixed-interest and private equity investments. “There is a lot of water to go under the bridge. The US Senate has been watering it down.”

 

Other parts of Trump’s flagship “big beautiful bill” had forced MLC to reconsider its litigation financing activities in the US.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 25, 2025, 3:05 a.m. No.23234872   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23234869

 

2/2

 

May be open to changes

 

Chalmers said he did not want Australian investors or funds unfairly treated or disadvantaged when it came to developments out of the US Congress, and hinted that Bessent may be open to changes.

 

“I’m confident [Bessent] understands these issues. They’ve been raised with him directly. I was able to raise them directly with him as well, and we hope for some good developments on this front in the coming days. If not the coming days, then certainly the coming weeks,” Chalmers said.

 

Section 899 was included in the broader legislation by Republican Jason Smith, who chairs the House Ways and Means Committee, the chief tax-writing body in Congress.

 

It would overrule existing tax treaties between Australia and the US, given the latter’s “later in time” principle where the most recent legislation supersedes previous arrangements. An explainer circulated by Republican members says the increases “apply to certain income, withholding, and excise taxes imposed on non-residents”.

 

The juiced-up rate would also be applied for any taxes “economically borne, directly or indirectly, disproportionately by” US businesses, leaving the door open for it to be used in response to Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code, which was included in a list of grievances alongside the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme’s patent rules circulated by US trade representatives in early April.

 

The Senate will soon vote on the “big beautiful bill”, which would extend soon-to-expire tax cuts first proposed in Trump’s first term and enact a huge list of budget and tax changes, such as eliminating taxes on tips, repealing Biden-era clean energy incentives and cutting funding for healthcare.

 

The lower house, which passed the original version in late May, must then weigh up whether it still supports the amended version.

 

Chalmers rejected US calls for Australia to lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP from 2 per cent.

 

“It’s not unusual for our partners and friends around the world to express or have a preference for us to spend more on defence,” he said.

 

“We are actually already very substantially increasing our investment in defence. We’ve found room in tight budgets for an extra $11 billion over the forward estimates and around $57.5 billion over the course of the next decade.”

 

https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/chalmers-urges-bessent-to-reconsider-revenge-tax-on-super-funds-20250625-p5ma8f

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 25, 2025, 3:25 a.m. No.23234931   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2263

>>22968851

>>23163733

US congressmen urge Trump administration to continue 'critical' AUKUS submarine deal to secure Indo-Pacific

 

Stephen Dziedzic 24 June 2025

 

US politicians who have championed AUKUS have stepped up lobbying efforts with the Trump administration, saying the defence technology pact is "critical" to deterring "Chinese aggression" and urging the White House not to dump it.

 

The Trump administration said earlier this month it would conduct a 30-day review of AUKUS, with US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth telling Congress last week his department would "make sure it fits the priorities of the president and that our defence and shipbuilding industrial base can support."

 

The federal government has played down the impact of the review, saying it was confident the White House would continue to endorse the initiative.

 

Five US congressmen who sit on multiple influential house defence committees have now written to the defense secretary to declare their support for AUKUS, saying it was a "critical mission" to "deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific region."

 

US wants Australia to step up

 

The senior Pentagon official conducting the review, Elbridge Colby, has previously said the US will only be able to sell at least three Virginia-class nuclear submarines to Australia under AUKUS if it succeeds in rapidly lifting its rate of submarine production.

 

Australia has committed $3 billion to help bolster America's submarine industrial base under AUKUS.

 

The five congressmen — including Republican and House Armed Services Committee chair Mike Rogers as well as Democrats Joe Courtney and Adam Smith — said in their letter that they were "confident in our ability to meet both US fleet requirements and our AUKUS commitments."

 

The politicians said additional funding commitments from Congress, on top of Australia's payments, have allowed US shipyards to ramp up steel fabrication and increase construction pace.

 

"Shipbuilders delivered two attack submarines in 2024 (USS New Jersey and USS Iowa), with two more slated for delivery in 2025 (USS Massachusetts and USS Idaho), and another two in 2026," they wrote.

 

They argued that increasing capacity would "open a pathway to selling the Virginia-class submarines to Australia in 2032, 2035, and 2038", as planned.

 

The congressmen also talked up progress on skills, saying "over 120" Australian sailors and officers were currently completing joint nuclear submarine training, with other Australian sailors already joint-crewing US Virginia-class submarines."

 

Marles 'confident' Australia can deliver

 

The letter comes as AUKUS supporters in both the Senate and Congress — as well as Australian officials — intensify efforts to reassure senior Trump administration officials that it should stand.

 

Late last week, Democrat Senator Tim Kaine and Republican Senator Pete Ricketts introduced a bipartisan bill aimed at strengthening AUKUS by "streamlining defence industrial base collaboration" and exempting Australia and the UK from congressional notification for overseas manufacturing.

 

Defence Minister Richard Marles discussed AUKUS during talks with his UK counterpart John Healy in London ahead of his visit to the NATO meeting in the Hague.

 

He again said the review was a "perfectly natural step" for the Trump administration to take and expressed confidence in AUKUS, although he said he would not speculate on its outcome.

 

Mr Marles also acknowledged that developing enough highly trained submariners, engineers, and specialists would be crucial to the success of AUKUS in Australia.

 

"We are confident that we can get this right, but we're not sanguine about it," he said.

 

"There is a lot of work to be done to meet the human challenge, but we believe we can get it done."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-24/us-congressmen-lobby-trump-administration-continue-aukus-deal/105455188

 

https://courtney.house.gov/media-center/press-releases/bipartisan-leaders-send-letter-secretary-hegseth-expressing-strong

 

https://courtney.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/courtney.house.gov/files/evo-media-document/06-23-25-letter-to-secdef-on-aukus-review.pdf

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 26, 2025, 2:45 a.m. No.23239557   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9558 >>9568 >>8416 >>2232

>>23192221

>>23234844

‘Daddy’ Trump takes centre stage as NATO bows to his demands

 

LARISSA BROWN AND BRUNO WATERFIELD - 26 June 2025

 

1/2

 

President Trump, the “daddy”, as Mark Rutte, NATO’s secretary-general, now refers to him, awoke on Wednesday after a night in the Huis ten Bosch palace, nestled in a forest on the edge of The Hague, in an “excellent mood”.

 

For the diplomats, who had tailored the entirety of the NATO summit to Trump’s limited attention span and the need to avoid unscripted outbursts, it was a good sign for the day ahead.

 

“The day begins in the beautiful Netherlands. The King and Queen are beautiful and spectacular people,” he posted on Truth Social after breakfast with King Willem-Alexander and Queen Máxima. “Our breakfast meeting was great! Now it’s off to the very important Nato meetings. The USA will be very well represented!”

 

At the World Forum where the summit was taking place, the popcorn was already out. “I think I’m going to cancel my subscription to Netflix because reality is much more interesting,” one senior NATO diplomat said before the day had begun.

 

On Sunday, four days earlier, the US president had stunned allies by launching an attack on Iran’s nuclear sites using 30,000lb bunker busting bombs and two dozen BGM-109 Tomahawk missiles. Officials were anxious in the days leading up to the event that Trump would cancel his trip to Europe.

 

To ensure he turned up, Rutte, known as the Trump “whisperer” for his ability to smooth over tensions between the US president and allies, had pulled out all the stops. “Truly extraordinary”, “daring” and a “big success” were among the gushing epithets in a caps-filled message from Rutte to Trump as he prepared to board Air Force One on Tuesday.

 

“Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran,” Rutte wrote in the personal message leaked by Trump.

 

“You are now flying to another great success in the Hague,” he added, as NATO prepared to sign up to a historic target of 5 per cent of GDP on military and defence-related spending. “It wasn’t easy, but we got them all to 5 per cent. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your success!”

 

On the flight across the Atlantic, Trump questioned whether the US would automatically come to the aid of European allies under the alliance’s Article 5 mutual defence clause.

 

“Depends on your definition,” he told reporters travelling on Air Force One. “There’s numerous definitions of Article 5, you know that, right? But I’m committed to being their friends.” Such remarks did little to ease the anxiety of member states on Nato’s eastern border, worried Russia might invade if the security guarantee falls apart.

 

When Air Force One landed and Trump emerged on Tuesday night, donning his white USA baseball cap, NATO diplomats breathed a temporary sigh of relief.

 

“Until I see him, I won’t believe he is there,” one senior military figure inside the alliance said two hours before he touched down.

 

Trump was whisked away in his motorcade along closed off motorways for a dinner with other alliance leaders hosted by Willem-Alexander.

 

Trump had the seat of honour next to Willem-Alexander with Giorgia Meloni, Italy’s populist prime minister, sitting on his other side. Out of all of Europe’s leaders, Meloni is closest to Trump politically and has close links to his Maga movement.

 

They dined on charred tuna and a mousse of Amsterdam pickles, marinated vegetables, chive cream and crispy onion. For the main course they had veal fillet, chanterelle mushroom sauce, asparagus, legumes and pommes Paolo, followed by a chocolate tart with Tonka beans, soft caramel and vanilla sauce. At the royal dinner Trump met the successor to the Dutch throne, Catharina-Amalia, the Princess of Orange.

 

Willem-Alexander and Maxima do not often invite guests to Huis ten Bosch as they live there themselves and see it as a family home. But Trump delights in the pomp and circumstance of royal places and his overnight stay in the ornate 1645 royal palace, rather than his initial plan to stay in a beachside hotel 19 miles away, was seen as a diplomatic triumph.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 26, 2025, 2:46 a.m. No.23239558   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23239557

 

2/2

 

Not far away, at the World Forum, Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, was due to open the dinner for defence ministers with a speech, but he said he would rather speak at the end.

 

John Healey, the defence secretary, who wished he had a pint of beer for the meal rather than the offerings of wine, explained: “First of all, he was slated to speak first. He said, ‘no’, I’d rather speak at the end.

 

“He put aside his scripted speech, and what he did was a reflection and a sum-up of the discussion.”

 

Healey described Hegseth as “smart” and “not worried about having his own views”.

 

“He’s got a clear view of what he wants to do with defence and also of how he wants to amplify the challenge that Trump has made to NATO.” After finishing his vanilla, strawberry and chocolate mousse, Hegseth told his counterpart that he recognised tonight that “nations have stepped up and the 5 per cent benchmark that we’re going to agree tomorrow is really historic”.

 

“All the NATO defence ministers, including me, recognise actually it’s down to us now to do the hard yards, not just in ten years time, for turning that into delivery,” Healey added.

 

As Trump arrived at the venue on Wednesday his convoy, flying the Dutch flag and the Stars and Stripes, was ushered into a special enclosure built especially for the Americans out of the public gaze.

 

Footage showed blue NATO doors being slammed shut around the presidential “Cadillac One” known as the “Beast” so he could enter in private.

 

In a press conference ahead of a two and half hour meeting of the North Atlantic Council, the principal political decision-making body of NATO, the US president compared Iran and Israel to “two kids in a school yard”.

 

In a long, rambling defence of his strikes against Iran, Trump boasted that he had stopped the longstanding conflict between Israel and Iran.

 

“They’re not going to be fighting each other. They’ve had it. They’ve had a big fight, like two kids in a schoolyard. You know? They fight like hell,” he said.

 

Interrupting him, Rutte said: “Daddy sometimes has to use strong language.” The comment was a reference to Trump’s outburst that the two countries “don’t know what the f*** they’re doing” on Tuesday.

 

Trump agreed, saying: “Yes, you have to use a certain word.”

 

For some, Rutte had gone too far.

 

British government sources described the American mood as “jubilant”. “They’re doing a victory lap and you can see why,” one said. But the source also said the Americans acknowledged how hard they had been on other NATO allies. “They did seem to recognise they’d been playing quite hardball.”

 

Officials said it was difficult to hold discussions with the US delegation when Trump could change his mind on an issue at any moment.

 

“Even when you’re speaking to the closest members of his team, even at secretary of state level, it’s not that people are lying to you but you need to be aware that if the president wakes up and reads something that makes him change direction, they won’t always know what is coming,” one diplomat said.

 

But overall, another said: “The mood is good.”

 

Ahead of Wednesday’s meeting allies had been told that rather than speaking at the beginning of the session as is conventional, Trump “wants to have the last word”. No one was going to stop him.

 

In a press conference afterwards, Rutte brushed off a suggestion that his gushing praise of “daddy” might be seen as weak, adding that his remarks were a “question of taste”. “He’s a good friend,” he said of Trump. “Doesn’t he deserve some praise?”

 

Trump said allies in the meeting “were so respectful of me … it was really moving”. He said there had been a “great victory” with allies agreeing to spend 5 per cent of national income on security.

 

“Almost everyone of them said thank God for the United States,” he said.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/world/the-times/daddy-trump-takes-centre-stage-as-nato-bows-to-his-demands/news-story/43d31f18897f62b1942e1ea4e84fc22e

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfNIV8n98iE

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 26, 2025, 3:05 a.m. No.23239568   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>9570 >>8416 >>8432 >>2232

>>23192221

>>23234844

>>23239557

Anthony Albanese looking at spending more on missiles and drones after pressure from Donald Trump

 

GEOFF CHAMBERS - 25 June 2205

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese, Richard Marles and Jim Chalmers are actively considering increasing defence spending on missiles, drones, frigates and nuclear submarine facilities but will not bow to pressure from Donald Trump to lift Australia’s defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

 

As the US President flew into the Netherlands for a royal reception amid rising hopes that his ­historic ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran would hold, Mr Trump was on the verge of another major foreign policy coup with NATO members set to increase defence spending to a total 5 per cent of GDP.

 

The pledge – a response to ­repeated demands from the White House that Europe pay more for its own security – was celebrated by Mr Trump after he leaked a ­private text message sent to him by NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte, which lauded him for striking Iran’s nuclear facilities and his success in pushing allies to spend more on defence.

 

Sitting with Mr Rutte, the US President said NATO, which he has regularly criticised, would now “be strong with us.”

 

“It’s a great victory for everybody I think,” Mr Trump said. “I’ve been asking them to go up to 5 per cent for a number of years, and they’re going up to 5 per cent, that’s a big (jump) from 2 per cent and a lot of people didn’t even pay the 2 per cent so I think that’s going to be a very big news.”

 

Mr Marles, who is representing the Prime Minister at the NATO summit in The Hague, was not ­expected to meet Mr Trump, who is only visiting the Netherlands for a short period of time.

 

The Defence Minister on Wednesday (AEST) was also not scheduled to meet any officials from the Trump administration, instead meeting officials from Germany, Poland, the Netherlands, Japan New Zealand and South Korea.

 

Government sources left open the possibility that Mr Marles would meet US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth but that depended on whether Mr Hegseth would leave the summit early with Mr Trump.

 

It is still not clear when Mr ­Albanese will finally have his first face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump after the latter had to leave the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada early to deal with the ­Israel-Iran war. The Australian revealed on Wednesday that the Prime Minister’s well-advanced trip to China may take place before he meets Mr Trump.

 

Mr Marles played down the absence of Mr Albanese at the NATO summit after it was suggested this had something to do with Mr Trump’s treatment of allies.

 

“Well, I wouldn’t overread, you know, the presence at any given meeting of leaders,” the Defence Minister said.

 

Mr Marles said NATO had become “much more significant” for Australia in recent years despite Mr Albanese’s absence. “This forum has been much more significant to us than it would have been five years ago – and indeed, in that time, our Prime Minister has attended two NATO summits and I’ve now attended two.”

 

Papua New Guinea’s Foreign Minister Justin Tkatchenko has also reportedly told local media that the country’s Prime Minister James Marape is hoping to meet Mr Trump in coming weeks

 

As NATO member countries deliver on the Mr Trump’s ­demands to lift defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP by 2035, ­senior Albanese government ­figures believe there is a disconnect between specified defence spending figures and how funding is allocated. Under the NATO spending spread, 3.5 per cent of the commitment would be for core defence ­expenditure and 1.5 per cent would cover upgrading of roads, bridges, ports and airfields.

 

The Australian understands the Albanese government is ­resistant to simply appearing to lift Australia’s defence spending by adding associated infrastructure like roads to total expenditure.

 

Many NATO countries are ­expected to fall short of their 3.5 per cent defence spending pledges, while Spain has been ostracised for rejecting the 5 per cent target as “unreasonable”.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 26, 2025, 3:06 a.m. No.23239570   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23239568

 

2/2

 

The Treasurer – who spoke with US Treasury secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday – said the government was watching NATO’s moves closely but had ­already done a lot in its March pre-election budget to boost military spending.

 

“It’s not unusual for our partners and friends around the world to express or have a preference for us to spend more on defence,” the Treasurer said. “We are actually already very substantially increasing our investment in defence. We’ve found room in tight budgets for an extra $11bn over the forward estimates and around $57.5bn over the course of the next decade.

 

“Obviously we’ve seen the ­announcements out of Europe. We’re obviously tracking those developments very closely.

 

“(Defence Minister) Richard Marles will do a characteristically great job representing our interests at the NATO summit, but we are already dramatically increasing our investment in defence. That’s warranted, and that’s why we’re doing it.”

 

The Albanese government, which is expected to announce spending boosts in coming months for the Henderson consolidation project and SEA3000 frigates program, has authorised major purchases over the past 12 months for US ammunition, rockets and guided weapons.

 

As the US and key allies including Britain and Japan ramp up ­defence spending, senior government sources made clear they were exploring ­increased funding for specific ­defence capabilities and projects, which would lift overall defence spending levels.

 

They also believe that the strategic advantage the US would gain from accessing Australian naval bases from 2027 was another major positive in the US-Australia defence relationship.

 

Amid pressure from Mr Hegseth for the Albanese government to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP as soon as possible and the Pentagon ordering a snap 30-day review into the AUKUS nuclear submarine pact, Australian and US defence chiefs are finalising plans for their biggest joint military exercise.

 

In defiance of Chinese military aggression in the Indo-Pacific and after Mr Hegseth raised concerns about the potential of President Xi Jinping ordering an invasion of Taiwan by 2027, more than 35,000 defence personnel from Australia, the US and 17 other countries will participate in Exercise Talisman Sabre from July 13 to August 4. The show of force will include live fire and training exercises, amphibious landings, ground-force manoeuvres, air combat and ­maritime operations in Australia, and for the first time, Papua New Guinea.

 

Sussan Ley on Wednesday urged Mr Albanese to increase defence spending to at least 3 per cent of GDP with a “focus on key capabilities, including space, drones and missiles”. Speaking at the National Press Club after receiving a national security briefing on Tuesday night, the Opposition Leader said global instability has “only worsened” since the Defence Strategic Review was delivered more than two years ago.

 

“Look at how much further it has deteriorated, even since last month’s election,” Mr Ley said. “Look at how much has changed in the past week alone. These developments underscore the need for Australia to step up our commitment to defence. Across the world autocratic countries are spending more on military capabilities. Many of our trusted allies are responding by matching urgent rhetoric with urgent action.”

 

Strategic Analysis Australia founder Michael Shoebridge said it was “highly embarrassing and beyond awkward” for Mr Marles to be at NATO “watching ­countries do what he knows he should be doing” in lifting defence investment. “He should be looking at what happened to Spain, when the Spanish Prime Minister tried to get out of the funding increase to defence saying ‘we’ll invest in capability, we don’t need to spend more than 2.1 per cent’,” he said.

 

“He was roundly condemned and pressured to change because the rest of NATO knew this didn’t make sense. If the 32 NATO member nations know they have to do more, then us lonely people down here in the Indo Pacific facing china as security challenge sure as hell need to do so.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/anthony-albanese-looking-at-spending-more-on-missiles-and-drones-after-pressure-from-donald-trump/news-story/79791bf963529fffc94f9355b6b17c5d

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 26, 2025, 3:21 a.m. No.23239588   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2279

>>22998144

>>23094566

>>23134162

Australia to boost cyber security and provide vehicles for Solomon Islands Pacific Islands Forum

 

Stephen Dziedzic - 26 June 2025

 

Australia will provide Solomon Islands with dozens of vehicles and cybersecurity support to help it host a high-profile meeting of Pacific leaders in September, as well as ramping up funding for aerial surveillance to track illegal fishing flotillas across the region.

 

The Pacific Minister Pat Conroy is in Honiara on Thursday, where he will announce a $20 million support package for the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) leaders meeting.

 

Leaders at the meeting will grapple with a host of issues, including climate finance and Australia's bid to co-host a Conference of the Parties climate meeting, a new "Oceans of Peace" security framework championed by Fiji's prime minister, and a potentially contentious review of the Pacific's diplomatic architecture.

 

But the gathering will also inevitably be seen as a litmus test of China's sway in Solomon Islands, where Beijing has rapidly built political influence since establishing ties with Honiara in 2019.

 

Earlier this month China's ambassador to Solomon Islands handed Acting Prime Minister Fredrick Kologetoa a $US1 million ($1.5 million) donation to buy 27 vehicles which will ferry Pacific leaders around at PIF.

 

Australia's $20 million package will be broader, providing funding for about 60 vehicles, cybersecurity, road upgrades and logistics support.

 

Australia has not directly criticised China's contribution to the meeting, but Mr Conroy said the Pacific was "best served by Pacific-led institutions and processes".

 

"Australia's commitment to Solomon Islands and the broader Pacific is steadfast. We are stronger together," Mr Conroy said.

 

China is also expected to push for its policing teams to play a visible role providing security at the leaders meeting, something Australia will be keen to prevent, in order to burnish its credentials as a security partner for the Pacific.

 

Illegal fishing in the Pacific a 'scourge'

 

During an interview with the ABC on Tuesday while visiting Papua New Guinea, Mr Conroy reiterated that China was "seeking a permanent security presence in the Pacific".

 

When the ABC asked him if China might try to leverage its Pacific policing links to help it establish "dual use" commercial infrastructure which it could exploit for military purposes down the track — something Australian officials have warned of privately — Mr Conroy said that was a "reasonable conclusion" to draw.

 

"We've made it very clear that we don't think it's appropriate for nations outside the region to be looking at securing policing footholds like that," he said.

 

The ABC has been told the pacific minister will also use his visit to Honiara to announce the government will deliver on its 2022 election promise to double funding for aerial patrols delivered under the Pacific Maritime Security Program, which he will cast as a major win for regional security.

 

Pacific nations have become increasingly alarmed by the illegal fishing in the region, which has devastated ecosystems and livelihoods, costing them up to $500 million in lost revenue over recent years.

 

In 2022 Labor promised that if elected it would increase funding to the program by $12 million a year from 2024-25, and federal government tender documents — first reported on by Reuters — suggest the government will pour a total of up to $477 million into the program over the next decade.

 

While there is only limited public data available on illegal fishing in the Pacific, analysts have previously told the ABC that vessels from China and Taiwan are responsible for much of the devastation.

 

While in PNG Mr Conroy took a thinly veiled swipe at Beijing on illegal fishing, labelling it a "scourge" and saying countries that failed to rein in it were "literally stealing food out of the mouths of Pacific Island people".

 

"We will use every resource available to us to outlaw that scourge," he said.

 

"And I would urge all balanced observers to reflect on the countries that allow that activity to occur and think: Do they have the interests of the Pacific islands of the heart if they allow that illegal fishing to occur?"

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-26/australia-to-support-solomon-islands-pacific-islands-forum/105461512

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 28, 2025, 1:10 a.m. No.23248389   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8393 >>2170

>>23212691

>>23218742

US president says he could bomb Iran again, as 3,200 Australians and family members register with DFAT

 

Max Walden and Sally Brooks - 28 June 2025

 

1/2

 

US President Donald Trump has warned Iran he would order another bombing raid on its nuclear sites if Tehran resumed efforts to develop a nuclear weapon.

 

Speaking to reporters at the White House on Friday (US time), Mr Trump said he would "without question, absolutely" consider further military action if necessary.

 

His comments came as the number of Australians and family members in Iran registered with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) crisis portal grew to 3,200.

 

Soon after Israel began bombing Iran in mid-June, DFAT evacuated its staff from Tehran to Azerbaijan.

 

On the advice of DFAT, some Australians in Iran travelled to the Iran-Azerbaijan border hoping leave Iran last week but got knocked back by Azerbaijan officials in part because they didn't have a special code, the ABC reported on Thursday.

 

Late on Friday, a DFAT spokesperson said the backlog of Australian requests for border crossing codes had been resolved.

 

They said DFAT was supporting Australians who wished to leave Iran secure seats on commercial flights that had begun operating out of the country.

 

A US government security alert said Iranian airspace had partially reopened, "although commercial travel from Tehran and other major hubs may be disrupted".

 

Iranian-Australians 'disillusioned'

 

Melbourne woman Maryam is worried for her mother, brother and his family who live in Iran.

 

"The possibility of war would take everything away, you know, and you worry about what would happen to them and just how we could support them in in all of this," said Maryam.

 

Maryam's mother is not an Australian citizen and while she has previously held visitor visas, she does not have a visa that is currently valid.

 

DFAT allows people who are citizens or their close relatives to register for emergency assistance via the crisis portal.

 

Maryam said Australia backing the US strikes against Iran did not sit well with many Iranians in Australia.

 

"I think every Iranian I talk to, they felt very disillusioned," she said.

 

"You're working here. You're paying tax. We are trying to contribute to this society."

 

There are more than 85,000 Iranian-born people living in Australia, according to Home Affairs.

 

Australian-Iranian Soroush, a civil engineer who works in fly-in fly-out jobs in West Australia, arrived back in Australia last week after leaving Iran via Turkiye.

 

Soroush was in Iran visiting his parents and sister for the first time in two years, but his trip got cut short by the Israel-Iran war.

 

Soroush said he drove from Tehran to the border with Turkiye to escape — and faced chaotic situations trying to get out of Iran.

 

He had tried to register with DFAT but couldn't get through the process because of a lack of internet access in Iran.

 

Iranian authorities have regularly cut off internet access in the country since the war with Israel broke out — on some occasions for days at a time.

 

"I couldn't even phone my friends to tell them to do this for me, and then when I decided to exit from Turkiye," Soroush said.

 

"I thought, 'if I get stuck somewhere, I will continue registering'."

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 28, 2025, 1:13 a.m. No.23248393   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23248389

 

2/2

 

Heated exchanges continue

 

As a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran continued to hold, there was further heated rhetoric from the White House in response to comments from Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei.

 

Mr Trump scoffed at Ayatollah Khamenei's warning to the US not to launch future strikes on Iran, as well as the Iranian supreme leader's assertion that Tehran "won the war" with Israel.

 

Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi hit back at Mr Trump in a social media post on Saturday.

 

He said a potential nuclear deal was conditional on the US ending its "disrespectful tone" toward the supreme leader.

 

"If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers," Mr Araghchi said on X.

 

Iran has rejected a request by the UN's nuclear watchdog to visit sites bombed by the US and Israel, saying it suggested malign intent.

 

Behind the cover of war

 

Martin Hodgson is a senior advocate with the Foreign Prisoner Support Service, which works to get Australians detained or otherwise in jeopardy overseas back home.

 

He said he was currently assisting "more than 10" Australians seeking to leave Iran who feared not only Israeli bombs but also Iranian authorities, who he said many suspected were using the war as cover to detain those viewed as unfriendly to the regime.

 

This could include Iranian-Australians who were known to be secular intellectuals, people of the Kurdish ethnicity, and Sunni Muslims, he said.

 

Iran's theocratic regime and most of its population are of the Shia sect of Islam.

 

Iranian authorities said on Wednesday (Tehran time) they had executed three men they accused of spying for Israel.

 

Amnesty International's deputy director for the Middle East and North Africa, Hussein Baoumi, said calls from Iranian officials for expedited trials and executions of those accused of collaborating with Israel showed an effort to "weaponise the death penalty to assert control and instil fear".

 

"The authorities must ensure all those detained are protected from enforced disappearance, torture and other ill-treatment, and afforded fair trials at all times, including during armed conflict," he said.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-28/us-president-says-he-could-bomb-iran-again-/105472516

 

https://x.com/araghchi/status/1938716761450520678

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 28, 2025, 1:30 a.m. No.23248416   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8419 >>8432 >>2233

>>23192221

>>23239557

>>23239568

Doing enough: Anthony Albanese leaps to his own defence

 

GREG BROWN and JOE KELLY - 27 June 2025

 

1/2

 

Anthony Albanese has hit back at a fresh claim by the Trump ­administration that his government is not investing enough in defence, declaring the budget Labor took to the May election “received the overwhelming ­support” of Australians as he ­talked up spending on health, wages and paid parental leave.

 

The Prime Minister would not say whether he feared Australia would face extra tariffs from the US if he did not increase spending on defence, after the US President threatened to double tariffs on imports from Spain for refusing to join other NATO nations in agreeing to lift yearly defence ­investment to 5 per cent of GDP.

 

“I’m not going to comment on things between Spain and the United States. What my job is (is) to look after Australia’s national interests,” Mr Albanese said.

 

After White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt on Friday (AEST) urged Asia-Pacific ­allies to increase ­defence spending in line with NATO nations, the Prime Minister said “we have lifted our spending”.

 

When asked whether he would stick to limiting the planned increase in defence spending to 2.3 per cent so he could prioritise investment in programs such as Medicare and the NDIS, Mr Albanese said he would ensure Australia had “the capability that we need”.

 

He said that, “in addition” to increasing spending on defence, the government was investing in paid parental leave and backing higher wages and superannuation payments.

 

“The increase in the minimum wage is all about the agenda that we took to the election that ­received the overwhelming ­endorsement of the electorate,” Mr Albanese said on Friday.

 

“We are providing for our defence investment, including $57bn of additional investment. I have said very clearly, we will invest in the capability that Australia needs.

 

“What we do is we put forward our budget. We took it to an election, it received the overwhelming support (of voters).”

 

The White House sent a firm message to Australia that it was not doing enough on defence spending, as it urged America’s partners in the Asia-Pacific to match the new effort made by NATO members.

 

In an outcome seen as a major win for the US President, NATO members this week committed at The Hague to investing 5 per cent of GDP “on core defence requirements as well as defence and security-related spending by 2035 to ensure our individual and collective obligations”.

 

Ms Leavitt said: “Our allies agreed to invest 5 per cent of their GDP annually in defence because President Trump demanded it. This will be the most significant … enforcement of NATO’s collective defence in the history of the NATO alliance. And as a result the United States of America will carry less of the burden and our NATO allies will be stronger than ever before. President Trump made this change possible.”

 

Asked what the expectations were for Asia-Pacific nations, including Australia, she responded that “if our allies in Europe and our NATO allies can do it, I think our allies and our friends in the Asia Pacific region can do it as well”.

 

“But as for our specific relations and those discussions, I’ll let the President speak on those,” she added.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 28, 2025, 1:31 a.m. No.23248419   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23248416

 

2/2

 

Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth had previously urged Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP “as soon as possible” – a message that was conveyed to his Australian counterpart Richard Marles on the sidelines of the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore in late May.

 

Pressed on Mr Trump’s cancelled meetings with world leaders, including Mr Albanese, after the President left the G7 summit in Canada early, Ms Leavitt said the US President was responding to an international emergency in the Middle East.

 

“I think many of those world leaders understood the situation happening in the Middle East and the urgency and the need for the President to get back to Washington to monitor that situation,” she said. “And obviously that was the right call considering the success of not only the operation on Saturday night but also the ceasefire that the President has since brokered.”

 

Charles Edel, the inaugural Australia chair at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said Australia needed to boost defence spending to counter China. “The threat Beijing poses to the stability of the region demands a more robust response from all nations interested in preserving a favourable balance of power,” Mr Edel said.

 

“That means greater efforts, greater resources, and greater commitments by Australia, by Japan, by New Zealand, by South Korea, and also by the United States.

 

“For America’s allies and partners in the region, sovereign decisions about resource allocation will not be made on the basis of what America demands. But leaning into defence should be a natural response to the deteriorating security environment, and an urgent matter of national interest.”

 

Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said Australia needed to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP, arguing the Albanese government was not funding the recommendations from its own Defence Strategic Review.

 

“That includes making sure that we have the missile manufacturing capacity we need in this country, making sure we’ve got those new technologies, drone and counter drone technologies that are essential in the modern world,” Mr Taylor said.

 

“Hardening our northern facilities at a time like this. Funding the Henderson sub facility, which is going to be so crucial to AUKUS.”

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/defence/doing-enough-anthony-albanese-leaps-to-his-own-defence/news-story/e249f37bdb909b48ee774bc0ecde876d

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 28, 2025, 1:47 a.m. No.23248432   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8435 >>2233

>>23192221

>>23239568

>>23248416

Anthony Albanese catches diplomatic Spanish flu with defiance against Donald Trump on defence spending

 

SIMON BENSON - 28 June 2025

 

1/2

 

If Anthony Albanese is trying to get noticed in Washington, he is going the right way about it. But not for the right reasons.

 

In leveraging his election victory and unprecedented domestic political capital to openly defy Donald Trump, the prime minister risks putting at stake something far greater.

 

Suggestions that the US/Australia alliance is in peril might appear to be slightly hysterical.

 

But this week has produced now a trifecta of further annoyances, including the delayed support for the US strikes on Iran and the admission it sought legal advice over it. And now a rebuff of Trump’s defence spending demands.

 

That is not to say that elements of the alliance aren’t potentially at risk. And Albanese’s posturing suggests one of three things: he is either unaware of this, disbelieves it or isn’t bothered by it.

 

The Prime Minister, emboldened and supported by a caucus moulded from his own liking, is trying to set the terms of the engagement with the US President with defence spending having become the crucible that now carries the relationship.

 

But his attempt to project strength by appearing to poke Trump in the eye, is not without risk considering we are now midway through the 30 day Pentagon review of the AUKUS arrangements.

 

Defiance of Trump might be more acceptable in Washington if Albanese was equally strident with Beijing.

 

Albanese is justifiably seeking to pivot off his thumping election victory to project strength, having effectively campaigned domestically against Trump as well as Peter Dutton.

 

This is understandable. The question is whether it is wise and whether this sort of domestic posturing put Labor’s political interests ahead of the national interest and asks the question as to whether Canberra lost sight of the value of the political capital invested in the relationship at a deeper level.

 

It’s hard to work out what Albanese is playing at.

 

While the alliance will survive, there is a risk that it will be damaged. At best, it may lead to lost opportunity.

 

There have been worse periods, such as when Whitlam took it near breaking point with Nixon.

 

But among the hawks in Canberra, there are deep concerns about where it is once again headed.

 

But there is a more fundamental question that underlines Trump’s calls for a lift in spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

 

Why does Australia need the US to point this fact out? Surely, the government and the defence establishment in Australia advising it should have already worked this out for themselves.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 28, 2025, 1:49 a.m. No.23248435   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23248432

 

2/2

 

It doesn’t matter if Albanese doesn’t like Trump. Most Australian’s don’t. But the vast majority of Australians still have unshakeable belief in the strategic importance of the alliance.

 

Albanese appears to be playing to the first at the expense of the second.

 

The second Trump administration’s new posture suggests it has worked out that the global strategic threat is greater than may have been appreciated by the Biden administration.

 

There is also a sense that US military strength alone may not be enough to deter it. Hence the aggressive approach to secure a greater step up from other members of the western alliance.

 

If the US strategy is to ultimately rebalance out of Europe, and into the Indo-Pacific, Trump would need to be satisfied that Europe is sorted and had dramatically lifted its defence commitment and capability.

 

He also needs greater stability in the middle-east.

 

While the majority of Europeans agreed to lift defence spending to five per cent of GDP, there was a standout exception – Spain – which has argued its own social spending program was more important.

 

As Trump now looks to the Asia Pacific, he sees a wobbly Japan and an increasingly difficult Australia.

 

Albanese is justified in his claim that his mandate, secured by his unprecedented victory, remains paramount.

 

To find 1.5 per cent extra in defence spending would punch a massive hole in Labor’s social program.

 

And he correctly argues that defence spending is in fact increasing. The consensus is growing, however, that this is not nearly enough considering the increasing uncertainty and volatility of the geo-strategic balance.

 

In the previous environment, Australia could not have been accused of being a free-rider. But the game has fundamentally changed.

 

The message from Trump’s office is clear: If Europe can lift its stake, then so can Australia.

 

There are those that are now worried that Trump could easily spite Albanese by backing out of the Virginia class submarines if this sort of domestic swaggering continues, and Albanese starts to show symptoms of the Spanish flu of diplomacy.

 

https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/albanese-catches-diplomatic-spanish-flu-with-defiance-against-trump-on-defence-spending/news-story/25ed8a4ba01838ab0faffd99888ddb46

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 28, 2025, 2:04 a.m. No.23248447   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2236

>>23230188

>>23234869

Reprieve for Australian super funds as US dumps 'revenge tax'

 

Tom Crowley - 27 June 2025

 

Australians investing in the United States will be spared from a tax of up to 15 per cent that the Trump administration was threatening to impose as "revenge" on countries that tax its tech giants.

 

US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he would ask that the tax be taken out of Mr Trump's "big, beautiful bill" after he secured an exemption from multinational tax rules.

 

Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who had lobbied Mr Bessent about the tax earlier this week, said the decision was "a really welcome one for Australians".

 

"I would like to thank the treasury secretary again for his time this week, where I was able to represent and raise those concerns with him directly," he said.

 

"In that meeting, he said he was progressing what he could to try and resolve these issues and we're really pleased to see some of that progress."

 

Government sources say Australia was not the main target of the tax, which was motivated chiefly by grievances with Europe resolved in G7 talks.

 

But the legislation, which targeted countries with "discriminatory" policies and specifically taxes on "digital services", was likely to capture Australia's proposed tax on social media platforms, which is to apply to platforms that fail to pay for news.

 

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer complained about that policy in a G7 meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last week.

 

The 15 per cent "revenge" tax would have applied to any Australian investors in the United States, with major implications for Australian super funds.

 

"We do not want to see our investors and our funds unfairly treated or disadvantaged," Mr Chalmers had said earlier this week.

 

Multinational tax gripe

 

The Trump administration has a staunch objection to the global multinational tax agreement known as "pillar two", which had been signed by the Biden administration.

 

Pillar two, which involves 140 countries, seeks to impose a worldwide minimum tax of 15 per cent on multinational companies, regardless of where they are headquartered.

 

In January, Mr Trump signed an executive order withdrawing the US from pillar two and a second order effectively threatening to use US tax law to retaliate against countries that sought to impose the minimum tax on American companies.

 

Mr Bessent now says he has struck a G7 agreement to instead recognise the US's own minimum tax regime on US investments in foreign companies ("GILTI"), which is between 10.5 per cent and 13.125 per cent.

 

In exchange, Mr Bessent said the US would no longer seek to impose retaliatory taxes. The move erodes the consistency of pillar two by carving out the US, but appears to have staved off the threat of an all-out American attack on the multinational framework.

 

"I want to thank my G7 counterparts for their partnership and collaboration towards achieving this historic outcome," he said, adding he had asked the US Senate and House to remove the revenge taxes from the bill.

 

"This understanding with our G7 partners provides greater certainty and stability for the global economy."

 

Rachel Reeves, the UK's Chancellor of the Exchequer, said the "important action" would "ensure a level playing field on tax".

 

Mr Chalmers said Australia would "consider the details" but would "continue to engage constructively … on international tax rules that are fair and ensure multinationals pay their fair share in Australia".

 

Further opportunities for revenge

 

Despite the reprieve on the digital revenge tax, Mr Bessent left the door open to the continued use of US tax policy to threaten countries whose laws the US dislikes.

 

"The Trump administration remains vigilant against all discriminatory and extraterritorial foreign taxes applied against Americans," he said.

 

"We will defend our tax sovereignty and resist efforts to create an unlevel playing field for our citizens and companies."

 

Mr Trump on Thursday threatened Spain with higher tariffs if it failed to increase defence spending in line with other NATO countries, in a move that could set a precedent for similar pressure on Australia if it does not lift its own spending.

 

Anthony Albanese declined to comment on the development but affirmed Australia would make its own defence spending decisions.

 

"I'm not going to comment on things between Spain and the United States. What my job is, is to look after Australia's national interest, that includes our defence and security interests and that's precisely what we are doing," he told reporters on Friday.

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-27/reprieve-for-australian-super-funds-as-us-dumps-revenge-tax-/105468208

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 28, 2025, 2:24 a.m. No.23248467   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>2236

>>23094566

Nearly one-third of Tuvalu residents apply for Australian climate change visa program

 

AFP / abc.net.au - 27 June 2025

 

Nearly a third of Tuvalu's citizens are seeking a landmark climate visa to live in Australia, as rising seas threaten the Pacific nation's palm-fringed shores.

 

Australia is offering visas to 280 Tuvalu citizens each year under a climate migration deal Canberra has billed as "the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world".

 

More than 3,000 Tuvaluans have already entered a ballot for the first batch of visas, according to official figures on the Australian programme, almost a full third of the nation's population, according to official figures seen by AFP news agency.

 

One of the most climate-threatened corners of the planet, scientists fear Tuvalu will be uninhabitable within the next 80 years.

 

Two of the archipelago's nine coral atolls have already largely disappeared under the waves.

 

"Australia recognises the devastating impact climate change is having on the livelihoods, security, and wellbeing of climate vulnerable countries and people, particularly in the Pacific region," Australia's foreign affairs department told AFP.

 

Australia and Tuvalu inked the groundbreaking Falepili Union in 2024, part of Canberra's efforts to blunt China's expanding reach in the region.

 

Under that pact, Australia opened a new visa category specially set aside for adult citizens of Tuvalu.

 

Already, there are signs the programme will be hugely oversubscribed.

 

Official data on the programme shows 3,125 Tuvaluans entered the random ballot within four days of it opening last week.

 

"This is the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world, providing a pathway for mobility with dignity as climate impacts worsen," a spokesperson for Australia's foreign affairs department said.

 

Tuvalu is home to 10,643 people, according to census figures collected in 2022.

 

Registration costs $25, with the ballot closing on July 18.

 

Concern over skilled worker shortages

 

The visa programme has been hailed as a landmark response to the looming challenge of climate-forced migration.

 

"At the same time, it will provide Tuvaluans the choice to live, study and work in Australia," the department said.

 

But the programme has also fanned fears that nations like Tuvalu could be rapidly drained of skilled professionals and young talent.

 

University of Sydney geographer John Connell warned that a long-term exodus of workers could imperil Tuvalu's future.

 

"Small states do not have many jobs and some activities don't need that many people," he told AFP.

 

"Atolls don't offer much of a future: agriculture is hard, fisheries offer wonderful potential but it doesn't generate employment," he added.

 

The Falepili pact commits Australia to defending Tuvalu in the face of natural disasters, health pandemics and "military aggression".

 

"For the first time, there is a country that has committed legally to come to the aid of Tuvalu, upon request, when Tuvalu encounters a major natural disaster, a health pandemic or military aggression," Tuvalu Prime Minister Feleti Teo said at the time.

 

"Again, for the first time there is a country that has committed legally to recognise the future statehood and sovereignty of Tuvalu despite the detrimental impact of climate change-induced sea level rise."

 

The agreement also offers Australia a say in any other defence pacts Tuvalu signs with other countries, raising concerns at the time that the Pacific nation was handing over its sovereignty.

 

Tuvalu is one of just 12 states that still have formal diplomatic relations with Taipei rather than Beijing.

 

Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said last year his country shared a vision for a "peaceful, stable, prosperous and unified region".

 

"It shows our Pacific partners that they can rely on Australia as a trusted and genuine partner."

 

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-06-27/tuvalu-residents-apply-for-australian-climate-change-visa/105466846

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 28, 2025, 2:54 a.m. No.23248497   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8501

Paedophile priest Alexis Rosentool: The scandalous case that sank the Aussie Cossack revealed

 

Perry Duffin - June 27, 2025

 

1/2

 

A senior priest of the Russian church in Australia can be revealed as a paedophile after a court suppression order concealed his name from the public as he faced trial.

 

Meanwhile, a devout Kremlin propagandist has chalked up 920 days hiding in Sydney’s Russian consulate after flagrantly breaching the same suppression order, having played a bizarre part in the priest’s downfall.

 

Alexis Rosentool is a senior figure in the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia, a branch of the church that went into exile during the rise of the Soviet Union in 1920. Last week he was found guilty of four charges related to his abuse of three males, this masthead can reveal.

 

Two male victims were indecently assaulted in the 1980s, and Rosentool had an “unlawful sexual relationship” with a child victim two decades later.

 

Details of the crime are sparse because Rosentool’s name has been suppressed by the courts for years. The order suppressing his name only lifted as the priest was taken into custody to await sentencing.

 

An unusual twist to the saga involves a Sydney-born, pro-Russian YouTuber who calls himself the “Aussie Cossack”, whose collaboration with police contributed to Rosentool’s arrest.

 

However, Simeon Boikov’s involvement has also resulted in him spending time in jail before he eventually fled to the Russian consulate in Woollahra to avoid rearrest weeks after being released.

 

Boikov, 35, rose to prominence during the COVID-19 pandemic by organising and speaking at anti-lockdown, anti-vaccine rallies in Sydney.

 

He was raised in the Russian Orthodox Church and in late 2019 learnt that Rosentool was an abuser at the monastery in Bombala on the NSW South Coast where he was based.

 

“There was a culture of suppression,” Boikov told this masthead.

 

“People gave excuses: ‘it was before my time’, ‘don’t rock the boat’. It infuriated me.”

 

Boikov began collaborating with police, and encouraging victims to make statements.

 

“I felt it was my mission to get this over the line,” he said.

 

When Rosentool was arrested and charged in May 2022, a suppression was put over his name to prevent Boikov from tainting a jury pool with his enormous social media following.

 

However, Boikov hosted an anti-lockdown rally at Circular Quay days later and, in a live-streamed speech, defiantly called out Rosentool’s name, violating the court suppression order.

 

“Now, guys, let’s make a very scandalous announcement here as well,” Boikov told the crowd.

 

Boikov was charged with recklessly breaching the suppression order, convicted and jailed for 10 months.

 

His time in custody was spent in the strictest conditions after he was classified as a national security risk. Boikov supports Russian President Vladimir Putin and in 2014 allegedly journeyed to the Donbas to meet the Russian militant who shot down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.

 

(continued)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 28, 2025, 2:57 a.m. No.23248501   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>23248497

 

2/2

 

After four months in prison Boikov was paroled in September 2022, and weeks later was approved by the parole authority to travel to Russia. A good friend, a priest, had just been killed on the frontline.

 

While buying thermal underwear, Boikov spotted a group of pro-Ukrainian activists at Town Hall and began filming.

 

A 76-year-old man confronted Boikov, who pushed the older man away. The older man fell and struck his head.

 

Boikov claimed self-defence but was charged, and released, by police without his passport.

 

However, the parole authority wanted to bring the propagandist back to custody. The assault on the Ukraine supporter, they believed, had violated his parole.

 

In April 2023, this masthead reported the first interview with Boikov after he made the fateful decision to seek shelter in the Russian consulate, rather than see out his parole period in prison.

 

This coming week Boikov will chalk up 930 days inside the consulate.

 

The ABC this year reported Boikov’s legal fees were paid by a fund bankrolled by Russian intelligence agencies. It also revealed tensions between the propagandist and the consulate staff.

 

He was convicted in absentia of assaulting the Ukraine supporter but can no longer annul that conviction because so much time has passed.

 

He will immediately be arrested once leaving the consulate but police and lawyers don’t believe he will do an extra day in prison for the assault.

 

“He spent 2½ years in the consulate to avoid – drumroll – four weeks in prison for the suppression,” one police source with knowledge of Boikov’s cases said.

 

Boikov says he remains in hiding because he fears more significant charges being laid, after accusations of foreign interference were levelled against him by Ukrainians in Australia and in the media.

 

“My psych sits there thinking I must be delusional, thinking there’s a way out of here,” Boikov said with a laugh.

 

“It’s hard to say I’m of sound mind. Would a person of sound mind stay here for 930 days?”

 

During Boikov’s legal and diplomatic dramas Rosentool continued to face suppressed court hearings but his absence was noted by the diocese.

 

“The Ecclesiastical Court has received letters of support of Archimandrite Alexis, as well as new letters of complaints from various people,” his church wrote in late 2019.

 

“The suspension of priestly function placed on Archimandrite Alexis as well as temporary removal from all priestly duties remains in force until the conclusion of the investigation.”

 

Rosentool will face a sentence hearing in August.

 

https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/the-scandalous-case-that-sank-the-aussie-cossack-revealed-20250624-p5m9x6.html

 

''Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia: Statement concerning Archimandrite Alexis (Rosentool) - 27 Jun 25''

 

https://www.rocor.org.au/?p=17550

 

https://www.rocor.org.au/news10/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/Announcement.pdf

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:29 a.m. No.23252089   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Notables

are not endorsements

 

#41 - Part 1

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 1

>>22964021 Hung parliament looms as possible federal election outcome, Newspoll shows - Almost half of all voters believe the Albanese government should be thrown out of office, but a greater number remain unconvinced that a Peter Dutton-led Coalition was ready to govern with the election still potentially poised to produce a hung parliament. An exclusive Newspoll conducted for The Australian shows no shift in the primary vote for either Labor or the Coalition over the past week, with combined support for both the major parties remaining at a near-record low heading into the final week of the campaign. With the Liberal leader declaring the election was still winnable, Labor’s primary vote remains unchanged from last week at 34 per cent compared to the Coalition’s primary vote of 35 per cent for the second poll in a row. This is a 1.4 per cent improvement for Labor on its May 2022 election result, which saw Labor elected on its lowest ever primary vote at an election. But the Coalition’s primary vote remains lower than its last election result of 35.7 per cent, which produced the lowest level of representation since the Liberal Party was formed under Robert Menzies. It also confirms the narrowest gap between the two major parties on primary vote since October 2023 prior to the failed voice referendum.

 

>>22964024 Dutton doesn’t want Welcome to Country on Anzac Day - Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has escalated his intervention in a contest over Welcome to Country ceremonies by saying they should not be conducted on Anzac Day because most veterans did not want them included. Dutton’s comments will inflame the debate that has unfolded since far-right hecklers disrupted ceremonies at Anzac Day services in Perth and Melbourne on Friday. Both Dutton and Prime Minister Anthony Albanese condemned the agitators, who included known neo-Nazis, and called for respect last week. But Dutton changed his tone on Monday, latching onto the culture war to take a strong stance on Welcome to Country while the Coalition’s agenda on immigration and road taxes were being called into question over conflicting statements from frontbenchers. He also criticised Qantas’ practice of acknowledging Indigenous lands on its flights, saying they were over the top. Asked at a press conference on Monday if an Anzac Day dawn service was an event significant enough for Welcome to Country, the opposition leader said it was not. “No would be my answer to that. It is ultimately for the organisers of the events and they can make the decision based on their membership,” he said. “But listening to a lot of veterans in the space, Anzac Day is about our veterans … I think the majority view would be that they don’t want it on that day.”

 

>>22964027 Kooyong MP Monique Ryan a ‘Zionist’ as Jewish leaders urge action - Kooyong MP Monique Ryan has declared she’s a supporter of Zionism and conceded that she made “mistakes” after October 7, having previously backed an arrest warrant for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and voiced support for the United Nations’ Hamas-linked aid agency. Most of her fellow teals failed to back Dr Ryan’s vocal support for ­Zionism as she said she “utterly supported” Israel’s self-determination and supported calls for a ­judicial inquiry into rising anti-Semitism in Australia. At a community forum in Kooyong on Thursday, Dr Ryan said she was supportive of Zionism, which she defined as “belief in the right of Jewish people to make a homeland in Israel and in the self-determination of Israel”. “I’m ­utterly supportive of that,” she said. Although Jewish leaders welcomed her stance, they warned that supporting Israel must go ­beyond “sound bites”. “Monique’s voting record, including voting often with the Greens and continued backing of UNRWA funding, suggest otherwise … Support for Zionism can’t end at a sound bite,” Zionism Victoria president Elyse Schachna said. “Backing Zionism and the Jewish community means opposing those who deny Israel’s legitimacy or excuse terrorism, and we haven’t consistently seen that from Monique. The Jewish community is paying close attention and actions will always speak louder than words.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:30 a.m. No.23252091   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 2

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 2

>>22964031 Monique Ryan’s desperate cash grab as Kooyong race tightens - Kooyong MP Monique Ryan has resorted to a last-minute plea for $20,000 in donations after claiming shadowy conservative forces were conspiring against her as her grip on the once-safe Liberal seat slips. In an email to locals on Saturday, Dr Ryan accused the Liberal Party and conservative groups like Advance Australia, Australians for Prosperity and Better Australia of orchestrating “co-­ordinated, well-funded” attacks designed to mislead voters. She mentioned neo-Nazi disruptions and grassroot anti-teal campaigners “Repeal the Teals” in an attempt to rally support ­during the final week of the ­campaign. Dr Ryan admitted she was scrambling for $20,000 to fund last-ditch digital advertising, telling supporters the seat could be decided by as few as 200 votes. The incumbent MP, who said she was facing an electorate of 37,000 undecided voters, claimed the “conservative ecosystem” - backed by the Liberals’ $120m “Cormack Foundation war chest” – was out to get her. “I never wanted to have to make this final financial ask, but I need to,” the email reads. “We need to raise $20,000 in the next few days to fund critical digital advertising - so we can cut through the noise, reach undecided voters, and tell them the truth. We’ve seen a scale of attacks I never thought possible – co-ordinated, well funded, and designed to mislead voters in the final stretch.”

 

>>22964037 ‘Hate’ for Jacinta Allan, Victorian Labor diminishing party stronghold - Victorian Liberals remain confident Peter Dutton’s outer-­suburban campaign strategy, combined with what Labor figures concede is “hate” towards Labor Premier Jacinta Allan, will see the party’s vote surge in the ALP stronghold of Bruce. While stopping short of predicting a surprise victory there on May 3, Liberals are reporting a positive response from voters in the electorate that Labor has held for some 29 years. Liberals hope this sense of support on top of a favourable redistribution that brought strong Liberal areas of Berwick into the electorate has weakened Labor’s grip enough to give them an outside chance. A Victoria Liberal identity who has been campaigning hard in the traditional Labor stronghold has stopped short of tipping a victory on Saturday, but predicted a surge in support. “I reckon it will be close,” they said. “It still feels OK.” A senior Victorian ALP source has conceded that while there was “no real concern” within the party that Bruce might fall to the Lib­erals, campaign staff had detected “lots of hate” directed to state Labor and the Premier among traditional Labor voters. “The days of this being a safe seat for us are over,” the source said. “Cost of living, state taxes, housing and the fact Labor’s been in power in Victoria for 21 of the past 25 years means they’re really blaming Labor.”

 

>>22964042 Election 2025: Muslim Votes Matter’s ‘strategic’ move to flip Labor seats - A pro-Palestine political movement aiming to elect Greens and independents has dramatically intervened to help the Liberal Party in Gough Whitlam’s old seat of Werriwa, in a “strategic” move to flex its electoral muscle to the ALP and punish Labor in a handful of marginal electorates. Werriwa is quickly becoming the Liberals’ last hope of snaring one of the ALP’s marginal southwest Sydney seats, which is held on a 5 per cent margin, and it is one of only four electorates where Muslim Votes Matter is preferencing the opposition over the government. In Werriwa, MVM’s how to vote card direct voters first toward the Greens and Libertarians, and then the Liberals before Labor. It’s a similar tactic being deployed in WA Labor-held marginals Cowan and Tangey, and Jim Chalmers’ Queensland seat of Rankin. Labor strategists have grown optimistic that incumbent Anne Stanley will hold off the Liberals’ Sam Kayal, but the final result could come down to just a thousand or so votes. Peter Dutton recently launched his party’s campaign in the seat, illustrative of how seriously it is vying for the electorate.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:30 a.m. No.23252092   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 3

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 3

>>22968774 Video: Group with historical CCP links ‘required’ Chinese Australians to vote for Ryan - Volunteers wearing Monique Ryan campaign T-shirts have been captured on video saying a community organisation, which has historical links to the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign influence operation, told them to vote for the teal MP. In the footage, a woman says the instruction came from Ji Jianmin, who is the president of the Hubei Association, an organisation representing people from the Chinese province that has also been accused of working with the United Front Work Department, a central party agency that advances CCP interests at home and abroad. Australia had a major reckoning with allegations of Chinese influence operations late last decade, prompting Malcolm Turnbull’s government to introduce foreign interference laws and making MPs more cautious about working with diaspora groups linked to foreign powers. In a video taken by Tharini Rouwette, who runs a group called COMPELL that advances multiculturalism in Australian politics, and uploaded to a Kooyong community Facebook group on April 22, two people wearing Ryan T-shirts claim Ji told them to vote for Ryan. “The Hubei Association President Ji Jianmin, how should I say this, he required us Chinese diaspora to support her,” says one of the Ryan volunteers, whose name is given only as Jessica. Another volunteer in the video, Stephen, adds: “Monique [Ryan] is an independent federal MP, her policies are quite suited to the needs of us Chinese diaspora. It feels like she can give a voice to us, so we want to support her.” The video has since been deleted from Facebook but remains on TikTok.

 

>>22968796 Video: Australian Electoral Commission refers Monique Ryan volunteers ‘Beijing links’ video to integrity taskforce - Australia’s election watchdog has referred a video involving Kooyong MP Monique Ryan’s campaign volunteers to a national taskforce for investigation, after footage emerged of volunteers saying they were directed to vote for her by groups accused of ties to Beijing’s foreign influence operations. A spokesperson for the Australian Electoral Commission said the agency had become aware of the footage when it was published on Monday and launched a review. “This includes referral for consideration by the Electoral Integrity Assurance Taskforce,” it said in a statement. “It is important to note that Australia has a secret ballot. Nobody knows how another individual votes. Your vote is your choice. We have also published advice to voters about influence in Australian elections, including a general reminder for all voters that every voter is responsible for making their own decision”. The taskforce is made up of officials from several government agencies, including the AEC, ASIO and the federal police. Earlier, Ms Ryan said she had herself referred to the AEC allegations that volunteers with alleged links to the Chinese Communist Party were directed to campaign for her.

 

>>22968807 Coalition vow: more Pacific infrastructure loans to undercut Beijing - Peter Dutton is moving to distance himself from Donald Trump’s foreign aid cuts, pledging an extra $2bn in Pacific infrastructure loans to counter surging Chinese influence across the ­region. Coalition foreign affairs spokesman David Coleman said a Dutton government would lift the Australian Infrastructure Fin­ancing Facility for the Pacific’s loans ceiling from $3bn to $5bn to deliver a raft of economy-strengthening projects. The move comes as Beijing looks to take advantage of the Trump administration’s decision to axe USAID support for the developing world, including $388m a year for Pacific countries. It’s understood the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade has been modelling the impact of Australian foreign aid cuts in case a Dutton government decides to mimic the Trump policy. However, a senior Coalition source said there would be no reduction to development assistance for the Pacific in its final election costings to be released on Thursday. Mr Coleman said more Australian-funded loans to Pacific countries would undercut efforts by Australia’s adversaries to win over regional leaders. “Infrastructure financing has become yet another battleground for influence in our region,” he said. “A larger AIFFP under a ­Coalition government will work to further strengthen Australia’s partnerships with nations across the Pacific and Timor-Leste. “It will complement the defence, security and other economic ties which were at the core of the Coalition’s Pacific Step-up when last in government.” The AIFFP so far has issued about $1.1bn in loans, which would leave nearly $4bn available for new ports, airports, energy and telecommunications projects if the Coalition is elected. The Opposition Leader named China in Sunday’s leaders’ debate as the biggest threat to Australia’s national security.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:31 a.m. No.23252093   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 4

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 4

>>22973535 Video: ‘They are calling’: Trump confirms Albanese has been trying to speak to him - US President Donald Trump confirmed he is aware the Australian government has been trying to contact him to discuss trade - and that he is yet to take Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s call. “They are calling, and I will be talking to him, yes,” Trump told this masthead and Nine News on Tuesday (Wednesday AEST) when asked whether he would speak to the Australian prime minister. Later, Albanese said if he won Saturday’s election, he would expect a phone call with Trump after. He told ABC radio on Wednesday morning he was not embarrassed by the president’s admission that he was not answering the phone. “Not at all. It’s a light-hearted throwaway comment from the president,” Albanese said. “I assure you I’m not staying up at night trying to ring anyone at the moment, I’m in an election campaign. “I’m sure if we are successful [in the election], we will have a discussion after Saturday. We have a relationship, we’ve already had a couple of phone calls.” Albanese has been under pressure from Opposition Leader Peter Dutton over his failure to secure another phone call with the US president following their conversation in February. During that call, Trump agreed to consider an exemption on tariffs for Australian steel and aluminium, but ultimately granted no country relief. Australia was also hit with a 10 per cent universal tariff in April, along with the United Kingdom and many other US allies. Albanese described that decision as having no basis in logic and “not the act of a friend”.

 

>>22973536 Final campaign dash kicks off as Albanese sweats on last-minute Dutton suburban fightback - Both sides of politics are gearing up for a frenetic 72 hours of campaigning with Anthony Albanese visiting every state before election day amid Labor fears Peter Dutton is staging a last-minute recovery. Despite a reported slide in the Coalition's primary vote to levels that would have historically made victory impossible, speculation has emerged that disgruntled outer-urban voters are more likely to preference the Liberal party than in previous elections. John Scales, co-founder of polling company JWS Research, said disenchanted voters in commuter-belt working class suburbs are sceptical of both major parties. However, unlike in 2022 when around two-thirds of One Nation and other centre-right minority party voters put the Coalition ahead of Labor, they now look likely to break 80:20 or as much as 90:10 towards Mr Dutton. The findings are based on polling across more than a dozen seats, with samples of 800 voters apiece where respondents were given the names of candidates and pressed to nominate a preference for the major parties. Mr Scales said the findings - if borne out on Saturday — mean the Liberals can still win as many as 10 such seats despite a falling primary vote. Seats that may break as Mr Scales described include Ryan in Brisbane, Bullwinkel in Western Australia, and Whitlam and Werriwa in New South Wales. He said the drift towards a Coalition-friendly preference flows was not evident in inner-city or teal-held seats, where the split was a more traditional 66:33. "We're not saying [Dutton] can win, we're saying it's a lot closer than people think," Mr Scales told the ABC.

 

>>22973546 Election 2025: Resurrected voice inevitable, says Penny Wong - Foreign Minister Penny Wong has suggested an Indigenous voice is inevitable and Australians will one day be incredulous there was ever an argument about it. In an episode of the Betoota Talks podcast released on Monday, Senator Wong said Anthony Albanese went ahead with the voice referendum in 2023 because “he is not a pull-the-pin kind of guy”, he thought it was the right thing to do and “a lot of First Nations leaders wanted the ­opportunity”. “I think we’ll look back on it in 10 years’ time and it’ll be a bit like marriage equality,” she said. “I ­always used to say, marriage equality, which took us such a bloody fight to get that done, and I thought, all this fuss. It’ll become something, it’ll be like, people go ‘did we even have an argument about that?’ “Like, kids today, or even adults today, barely kind of clock that it used to be an issue. Remember how big an issue that was in the culture wars? Blimey, just endless.” On October 14, 2023, 60.1 per cent of Australians voted no to an Indigenous advisory body ­enshrined in the Constitution. When Mr Albanese was questioned about the voice in the leaders debate, he repeated his long-stated position that he respects the outcome. Asked if he still believed in it, Mr Albanese replied: “It is gone.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:31 a.m. No.23252094   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 5

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 5

>>22973557 Election 2025: AEC refers Clare O’Neil to integrity taskforce over Chinese polling booth recruits - Australia’s election watchdog has confirmed it will refer allegations that the Hubei Association was planning to send out dozens of Chinese volunteers to Labor Minister Clare O’Neil and the Greens Party to a national taskforce for investigation. The taskforce is made up of officials from several government agencies, including the federal police, ASIO and the AEC. Cabinet minister Ms O’Neil has been embroiled in an election-eve controversy over Chinese campaign volunteers, with confirmation 10 individuals linked to an organisation ­associated with Beijing’s foreign influence operation were being ­recruited to staff her polling booths on election day. As part of their ongoing investigation into teal MP Monique Ryan’s campaign in Kooyong, the Australian Electoral Commission will review reporting of further irregularities concerning the Labor minister and a Greens candidate for the seat of Menzies. A spokesperson for the AEC said on Wednesday that the agency was aware of the latest developments after The Australian revealed the organisation had been planning to release more volunteers at polling booths to campaign for Labor and the Greens. “They will review all current reporting, and other available information, as part of what they’re looking into,” a spokesperson for the AEC said.

 

>>22977652 Election 2025: Chinese operative admits he has been helping Labor at elections for years - A Labor Party member at the centre of a controversy over the recruiting of Chinese volunteers for Housing Minister Clare O’Neil says he has “mobilised” political campaigners from an ­organisation linked to the CCP over multiple federal elections. As the Australian Electoral Commission broadened its investigation on Wednesday into the axed plan to provide volunteers for Ms O’Neil from the Hubei ­Association, Chap Chow described himself as a political ­organiser and “friend” of the ­Albanese government cabinet minister. Mr Chow said he travelled on a trip to China funded by a Chinese airline and it can also be revealed he campaigned to keep mainland Chinese separated from Hong Kong and Taiwanese community members as part of a planned redistribution of federal electorates in Melbourne. The Australian has obtained an email written last year by Mr Chow relating to the AEC’s ­redistribution in which he ­“expressed his concerns” over the plan to include the suburb of Box Hill in the electorate of Menzies. In the letter, the Labor Party member suggested it would be better to keep voters with mainland Chinese heritage apart from Hong Kong and Taiwanese people if possible to “avoid riots”. “The electorate of Menzies contains two suburbs … Doncaster and Templestowe which respectively each accommodates large proportion of Chinese Australians,” the email states. “Box Hill too contains quite a large proportion of Chinese … the only difference is, while the ­Chinese who live in Doncaster and Templestowe are mainly ­immigrants from Taiwan and Hong Kong, those who live in Box Hill are predominantly from mainland China. Given the tension in recent history over the Taiwan Strait and the Hong Kong riot, mixing … does not foster social harmony … the Eastern Freeway … would make a most convenient and identifiable border.”

 

>>22977668 Catholic schools election intervention in key seats sparks independents’ ire - The Catholic Church in Victoria has intervened in the federal election campaign, attempting to dissuade their school parents from voting for Greens or independent candidates in seven hotly contested electorates. A series of letters written by the Victorian Catholic Education Authority and distributed to parents of Catholic school students in the seats of Monash, Wannon, Goldstein, Kooyong, Cooper, Wills and Macnamara, highlights the support provided for Catholic school funding by major party candidates while raising uncertainly about the position of independents and minor party candidates. It urges parents to “take this letter into consideration” when they vote. The VCEA, as a registered charity, is prohibited by Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission (ACNC) rules from promoting or opposing a political party or candidate for political office. VCEA chairman James Merlino, a former Labor deputy premier of Victoria, defended the intervention. “The information provided to parents and carers was factually correct and focused on the positions of the main candidates, as this would be most relevant to parents,” he said in a statement. “It does not endorse a particular candidate. “It is entirely up to parents how they use the information that has been provided to them. We make no apology for representing the best interests of Catholic schools, parents, teachers and students.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:32 a.m. No.23252096   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 6

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 6

>>22981918 Final Newspoll: Anthony Albanese to defy historic major party slump - The combined primary vote of the major parties has fallen to a record low on the eve of the election, with Anthony Albanese on track to be returned for a second term but without any guarantee of securing majority government. But both leaders will also ­contest the election with deeply negative approval ratings, with both the Prime Minister and Peter Dutton suffering declines in personal support in the final week of the campaign. The final Newspoll of the ­campaign conducted for The Australian shows Labor ahead of the Coalition with a two party preferred lead of 52.5-47.5 per cent. A majority of voters claim they would be better off personally over the next three years under a Labor government than the Coalition. As the two candidates for the Lodge made their final pitches to voters on Friday, the Opposition Leader claimed the nation could not ­afford another three years of the economic trajectory it was on under Labor. “We can’t afford to continue on our current path,” Mr Dutton told The Australian, as he spent his final full day of campaigning swinging through the Perth ­suburbs. “We’ve had the largest fall in living standards in history, power bills, food and insurance costs are all higher, housing is unaffordable, and our country is less safe. “The Prime Minister is weak and simply not up to the job.” Mr Albanese - who spent his day fighting for votes in Tasmania, Melbourne and Mr Dutton’s northern Brisbane seat of Dickson – said the election presented a clear choice and urged voters to stick with Labor during uncertain times. “This election is a choice,” the Prime Minister told The Australian. “Building Australia’s future under Labor with tax cuts, stronger Medicare, 20 per cent off student debt, 5 per cent first home deposit – or higher taxes, bigger deficits and savage cuts under the Liberals. In uncertain times ­Australians cannot risk the ­Liberals’ chaos … (they) have changed policies daily.”

 

>>22981936 Video: Election 2025: Peter Dutton banking on ‘surprises’ in key seats - Peter Dutton is confident of winning at least 10 seats from Labor on Saturday night but would need a miracle to beat Anthony Albanese, according to Coalition strategists relying on tracking polling in key electorates and strong pre-poll support for the Liberals and Nationals. The Australian can reveal that despite the Liberals and Nationals falling behind the ALP in national polls, Coalition campaign headquarters believes it can win as many as 10 seats from Labor, three seats from teal independents and one from the Greens. After seat polling in January indicated Mr Dutton was on track for a historic victory over the first-term Albanese government, the Coalition’s position has deteriorated on the back of Labor scare campaigns and a boost for the Prime Minister after Donald Trump’s tariffs blitz. As of Wednesday night, senior Liberal strategists believed the Coalition was most likely to pick up 10 seats. Based on the most optimistic and best-case scenario, which opposition figures concede won’t happen, there is a pathway that could give the Coalition 22 seats. Despite many battleground contests being considered line ball, the Coalition is hopeful of winning a rump of ALP seats including Aston, Gilmore, McEwen, Tangney, Solomon, Paterson, Werriwa, Gorton, Hawke and the newly established Western Australia seat of Bullwinkel, which is notionally held by Labor.

 

>>22981951 Video: Election 2025: Anthony Albanese and Penny Wong dine out with friends of Chinese Communist Party - Labor has courted Beijing-backed property developers and senior figures in the Chinese Communist Party’s foreign-influence arm in a pre-election push to secure Australian Chinese donations and lock in the community’s votes in key seats. The Australian can reveal ­Anthony Albanese celebrated his birthday in March at an intimate lunch with the Chinese Building Association of NSW, which has close ties to state-run construction firms in China. And Foreign Minister Penny Wong enjoyed yum cha in ­Brisbane last month with ALP donor Peter Zhiwu Zheng, the president of a Chinese cultural ­association linked to the CCP’s United Front Work Department. Australian Chinese votes will be critical in at least 10 seats in Saturday’s election, including four each in Sydney and Melbourne, and one each in Brisbane and Perth. Members of the CBANSW sang happy birthday to Mr Albanese and presented him with a sparkler-topped cake at the function in early March, just weeks before the Prime Minister called the May 3 poll. Video of the event was circulated on WeChat by a Beijing-based influencer who shares Australian content with more than 3 million followers.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:32 a.m. No.23252097   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 7

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 7

>>22985904 Video: Voting polls officially open for 2025 Federal Election - Voting polls across Australia have officially opened for the 2025 Federal Election. - 9 News Australia

 

>>22985947 Federal election polls open in most Australian way imaginable - In pictures: Election Day 2025 kicks off - May 3, 2025

 

>>22985966 Video: Australia Federal Election LIVE: Australians Head to Vote | Anthony Albanese vs Peter Dutton - BONDI BEACH LIFE SAVING CLUB, SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA - Australians vote in the country's federal election. Australians are voting on Saturday with the ruling centre-left Labor party a favourite to secure a majority government, according to a recent YouGov poll. Incumbent Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is seeking to defeat main challenger Peter Dutton of the conservative coalition to become the country’s first leader in two decades to win consecutive elections. The country’s cost-of-living crisis has dominated the lead-up to the polls, with both Labor and the Coalition unveiling a number of policies intended to ease spiralling housing costs. Recent uncertainty caused by US President Donald Trump has also had an unforeseen effect on Australian political discourse, with candidates navigating major geopolitical shifts across the Pacific. Australians have been casting their ballots in early voting since April 22, with more than 8.5 million people voting by pre-poll or postal votes before election day - a considerable jump on the 2022 election. - CNBC-TV18

 

>>22985970 Video: Australia Election Results 2025: Vote Counting Begins | Australia Election 2025 - Votes are counted after polls closed on the east coast in Australia's general election. The center-left Labor Party of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is seeking a second three-year term. - CNN-News18

 

>>22985972 Video: Australia Decides: LIVE Federal election coverage from 9 News Australia - Join Nine News for the most comprehensive 2025 Federal Election coverage. - 9 News Australia

 

>>22985977 Video: Election Results: Sky News Australia - Sky News Australia brings you the latest results from the Australian Federal Election. - Sky News Australia

 

>>22985981 Video: LIVE: ABC NEWS Election Night Live with full results and analysis - David Speers and Sarah Ferguson deliver comprehensive results and analysis of the 2025 Australian Federal Election with Casey Briggs, Antony Green, Laura Tingle, Jeremy Fernandez, Bridget Brennan and Patricia Karvelas. - ABC News (Australia)

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:33 a.m. No.23252100   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 8

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 8

>>22986131 Election 2025:Albanese leads Labor to historic victory as Dutton on brink of losing seat- Anthony Albanese will hold power as prime minister after leading Labor to an extraordinary victory at the federal election and driving Peter Dutton to the brink of defeat in his home seat. A significant swing to Labor in more than a dozen seats put Labor in position to increase its majority in parliament, with some supporters calling the results a landslide. The results made it impossible for Dutton to claim power, whether in minority or majority government, as the opposition leader was in danger of losing his seat of Dickson on the northern edge of Brisbane. The prime minister signalled his confidence in seizing key seats from the Liberals at the end of a campaign fought on the cost of living, while early counting showed Australians were shifting to Labor in battleground seats. The voting showed the Labor candidate for Dutton’s seat, Ali France, had posted a significant gain in her primary vote, putting her in a strong position to win the seat. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said the Coalition’s nuclear policy had worked against Dutton in his home seat after he said he was willing to have a nuclear power station in his local area. Albanese insisted he could hold on to power during a series of interviews on Saturday, as he campaigned in Melbourne and Sydney and joined his partner, Jodie Haydon, and his son, Nathan, in casting his vote in his home seat of Grayndler. “Majority government is, I think, very much in the interests of Australians,” he said. Labor supporters said privately that the early count vindicated their predictions of a landslide for Albanese, although federal ministers have insisted they took nothing for granted and believed it was a tight contest. Dutton argued throughout the campaign that Labor would have to rely on the Greens in a hung parliament unless voters swung behind the Coalition, and he kept up the message in the final hours of the campaign.

 

>>22986141 ‘Very sad’: Dutton loses seat of Dickson in heavy Coalition defeat - Peter Dutton has lost his seat of Dickson in suburban Brisbane and become the first federal opposition leader to suffer such a loss in a devastating result for Coalition MPs. The result has sent a shockwave through the Coalition, which will be in opposition for another term after a heavy loss on Saturday night. Just weeks ago, the Coalition believed Dutton had a serious chance of defeating Anthony Albanese’s Labor government after just one term, but now there is an open contest for the leadership of the Liberal Party. The Coalition leader was defeated by Labor candidate Ali France, a disability advocate with an amputated leg who had already contested the seat against Dutton twice. She had to overturn a 1.7 per cent margin to win. Dutton, 54, is the first sitting party leader to lose their seat at an election since then-prime minister John Howard was beaten in Bennelong on the same night he lost government in 2007. Nationals leader Charles Blunt lost his seat of Richmond at the 1990 election, which was won by Labor. Dutton told Coalition supporters in Brisbane that he had called France to congratulate her on her victory, saying: “She will do a good job as a local member … I wish her all the best.” Dutton said France’s late son Henry, who died of leukemia last year, would be proud of his mother’s victory. He added that he was proud of breaking the “one-term curse” in Dickson that had seen the seat regularly change hands between major parties before his victory in 2001. Before Dutton’s loss was confirmed, Coalition finance spokeswoman Jane Hume said it “will be very sad” to see Dutton leave parliament if he loses his seat as the vote returns suggest. “Peter is a very popular colleague among his colleagues,” Hume told Channel Seven. “He is a very good man.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:33 a.m. No.23252102   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 9

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 9

>>22986156 COMMENTARY: A calamity for the Coalition and a stunning win for Anthony Albanese - "The significance of Anthony Albanese’s victory is as stunning as it is for the loss of Peter Dutton and potentially his own seat. Yet three months ago it was an unlikely outcome. The Prime Minister has defied his government’s own record of failures and the majority-held view of the electorate that Labor did not deserve to be re-elected because of it. Yet this is what has occurred. For the Coalition this result is a calamity. The Liberals and Nationals now face their own existential questions. The Coalition failed in the seats that Labor rightly feared would fall. It failed in seats it should have kept. It is redeemed only by the few surprise seats that it flipped. But it misread the social dynamic, misread the mood and misread the polls. Three key factors underscore what has occurred. The nation has confirmed that it remains in a post-Covid cycle of government dependency. Labor exploited this to maximum effect. An unwritten agreement continues to exist that while people understand things are bad, as long as their bank accounts keep being topped up, they won’t disturb the equation. This was as much a victory for an addiction to government intervention over aspiration as it was a striking result for the Labor Party campaign machine. Dutton’s defeat represents a complete collapse of the Coalition’s political operation. The turbulence of Trump, the global uncertainty have played to incumbency. This is a complete reversal of the global dynamics that western governments faced 12 months ago. Dutton failed to pivot to this shift. Finally, Labor’s aggressive campaign against Dutton was met with ineffective resistance. Just as Labor positioned Scott Morrison at the last election and won the contest, Labor effectively positioned Dutton as well with an absence of response. At 8pm on Saturday night, it was clear the Coalition was not in a position to win. This would be among the earliest calls on a federal election. This represents the scale of the debacle." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

 

>>22986163 How Anthony Albanese rediscovered his mojo to deliver election win - Labor MPs at the beginning of this election year had one big fear - Anthony Albanese waiting all the way till May before leading them to a federal election. After a torrid two years of a cost of living crisis, an embarrassing loss at the Indigenous Voice referendum and Peter Dutton on the up and up in the polls, the ALP thought if the Prime Minister waited too long that things would only get worse. “Back then, we were thinking we need to go soon because if we wait until May we’re stuffed,” one Labor insider said. “In the end we were looking at that date in April, which was really the earliest we could have gone because of the WA election, but then there was the cyclone (in Queensland).” On Saturday night, Mr Albanese proved a May election was far from a stuffing. Labor was on its way to a bigger majority than it got in 2022 and the Albanese Government had experienced a resurrection. Mr Albanese has benefited from some significant momentum-boosting moments of the campaign including Peter Dutton’s backflip on key policies and escaping worse-than-average tariffs inflicted by Donald Trump. But government insiders say the Prime Minister rediscovered his mojo months before calling the election, citing an early January test drive through Queensland and a big Medicare play earlier in the year to frame the party’s re-election platform as key to Labor’s rebound.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:34 a.m. No.23252105   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 10

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 10

>>22986232 COMMENT: The truth about this election is that Anthony Albanese got lucky - "As the Prime Minister marched into a polling booth clutching his long-suffering cavoodle Toto on Saturday, the biggest danger of this election was hanging in the air. Anthony Albanese got lucky. He got lucky that he ran against Scott Morrison when he was popular as dysentery in 2022. The Prime Minister got lucky again when he stuffed up the Voice referendum and the Liberal Party started thinking, “Oh, something is happening, we could win”. Instead, they got complacent. They didn’t do the work. That’s why one Liberal MP described treasury spokesman Angus Taylor as “an absolute disaster” on Saturday night. He got lucky when the Liberal leader wanted to dot the landscape with little nuclear reactors and sack 41,000 public servants. This might be red-meat to the Liberal Party base that already votes for him, but it’s not a huge turn on for swinging voters unless you can explain it properly. He didn’t. The election of Donald Trump? Lucky again. The US President promptly spooked the horses in Australia from the day of his inauguration, with his meeting with the Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, before spraying friends and foes with trade tariffs. He got lucky the Liberals didn’t have a coherent tax policy and promised to repeal tax cuts if elected. Lucky when Peter Dutton had his tyres over-pumped by supporters who inflated his chances of defeating a first term government for the first time since the 1930s. He got lucky that the Liberal leader didn’t have a strategy to inoculate himself from inevitable attacks about his record as health minister on bulk billing. Finally, he got lucky with two wildly popular Labor premiers - first in WA at the 2022 election and now in South Australia. WA saved him from minority government in 2022. Farmers Union Iced Coffee was deployed to do the same in 2025 - as the PM and the SA Premier were photographed downing a carton of the good stuff. The “Mali factor” - the popularity of SA Premier Peter Malinauskas – was expected to deliver the ALP the seat of Sturt in 2025, a blue ribbon seat which hasn’t voted Labor since 1969. Meanwhile, the PM even got lucky when there was a terrible cyclone in Queensland, which gave ALP strategists more time to repair and hand down a budget, something the Liberals insisted he would never do. They were wrong." - Samantha Maiden - news.com.au

 

>>22986290 Keir Starmer Tweet: - Congratulations, @AlboMP on your election win. The UK and Australia are as close as ever - and we will continue to work together to deliver a brighter future for working people in both of our countries.

 

>>22986956 Volodymyr Zelenskyy Tweet: - Congratulations to Prime Minister @AlboMP on a confident electoral victory. I wish you continued success in serving the people of Australia and delivering meaningful achievements. Ukraine sincerely values Australia’s unwavering support and its principled stance on ending Russia’s war and securing a dignified and lasting peace. We look forward to further strengthening our productive partnership in pursuit of peace, security, and freedom.

 

>>22986965 Emmanuel Macron Tweet: - Congratulations, dear Prime Minister @AlboMP, on your re-election. In the face of global challenges, Australia and France have so much to achieve together - especially in the Indo-Pacific. Let us continue to write, with ambition and friendship, the new chapter of our partnership.

 

>>22986981 Secretary Marco Rubio Tweet: Congratulations to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on his victory in Australia’s federal election. Australia is a valued U.S. friend and a close partner. We look forward to continuing to promote freedom and security in the Indo-Pacific and around the world.

 

>>22989198 Foreign Ministry Spokesperson’s Remarks on the Result of the Federal Election of Australia: - China notes the reports and congratulates the Labor Party and Prime Minister Albanese. China stands ready to work with the new Australian government led by Prime Minister Albanese and, under the fundamental guidance provided by the important common understandings between the leaders of the two countries, continue advancing a more mature, stable, and productive comprehensive strategic partnership between China and Australia to further benefit both countries and peoples, and contribute positively to the peace and stability of the region and beyond.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:35 a.m. No.23252109   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 11

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 11

>>22989207 Australia election win seen strengthening Albanese's hand with US - Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is likely to work more closely with centre-left governments in Britain and Canada, as well as other democratic allies, after a resounding election win strengthened his hand in dealing with the U.S., analysts said. Albanese's Labor Party rode a voter backlash against the policies of U.S. President Donald Trump to a come-from-behind victory that expanded his parliamentary majority, echoing the reelection win a week ago by Canada's ruling party. After his cabinet is sworn in, Albanese is expected to visit Washington for discussions on U.S. tariffs and defence matters, while also working with Asian and European nations to broaden export markets and defence cooperation, hedging against U.S. reliance. Albanese had presented himself to voters as a safe pair of hands amid global turmoil, in contrast to conservative opposition leader Peter Dutton, who was compared to Trump, former strategists for the opposition Liberal Party said in assessing their loss. Treasurer Jim Chalmers said on Sunday there were global challenges ahead for the returned government. "People recognised if you want stability while the global economy was going crazy then a majority Labor government was the best way to deliver that," he said in an interview with the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Chalmers said his immediate focus was global economic uncertainty, particularly the impact of tariff tensions between the United States, Australia's main security ally, and China, its largest trading partner.

 

>>22989224 Opinion: Dutton was never a Trump clone. But he fell for the trap of MAGA-style politics - "Anthony Albanese has two cyclones to thank for his historic trouncing of the Coalition. Cyclone Alfred’s arrival off the Queensland coast delayed plans for an April election and allowed Labor to use the budget to launch into the election campaign. Even more important was the hurricane-like return of Donald Trump to the White House. Cyclone Donald made landfall in Canada last week, delivering the centre-left Liberal Party a fourth-term victory that seemed impossible at the start of this year. Then he crashed through Australia’s electoral map, demolishing the Coalition’s hopes of victory. The parallels between the two countries, both close American allies, are unmistakable. Canadian Conservative Party leader Pierre Poilievre lost not just the election but his own seat, as did Peter Dutton. Local factors at play in this election - Dutton’s woeful campaign, Albanese’s astuteness, interest rates beginning to fall – were all crucial. But around the world, Albanese’s victory will be interpreted as a repudiation of Trumpism and the latest sign of a revival of social democratic politics. The turnaround from the start of this year has been rapid and remarkable. As Trump’s second inauguration approached on January 20, centre-left parties were grasping for relevance. In an era of high inflation, incumbency had become a curse and left-wing governments were in an especially grim position. Conservative populism was in the ascendancy. Canada’s progressive prince, Justin Trudeau, announced his retirement in January as a beleaguered, unpopular figure. Labor was falling behind the Coalition in the polls, raising the likelihood of a Dutton prime ministership. Trump’s radical and in many ways frightening return to office has breathed new life into centre-left parties and laid a booby trap for conservative leaders. Dutton was never a Trump clone, and notably called him out for berating Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. But he dabbled in MAGA-style politics by appointing Jacinta Price to an Elon Musk-style government efficiency role, and praised Trump as shrewd and a “big thinker” when he proposed his bizarre plan to turn Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East”. Albanese, cleverly, rarely invoked Trump’s name but weaponised his presidency by accusing Dutton of wanting to take Australia down an American-style path on healthcare and wages. With uncertainty roiling the globe, he presented Labor as a beacon of stability and even kindness - a word not associated with Trump’s bullying and bluster. The contrast was largely implicit but impossible to miss." - Matthew Knott - theage.com.au

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:35 a.m. No.23252110   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 12

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 12

>>22989228 Defeated Liberals now brace for leadership and policy war - The next leader of the Liberal Party is expected to be Sussan Ley, Angus Taylor or Dan Tehan, as MPs prepare for an internal war on their future policy direction after Peter Dutton led the Coalition to one of its biggest electoral drubbings. Several MPs said the leadership battle would likely be between the deputy Liberal leader, opposition Treasury spokesman and the immigration spokesman, after Mr Dutton lost his seat of Dickson. Conservative Liberal MPs are likely to swing in behind Mr Taylor, but there will be fierce resistance to him being rewarded after failing to outline a coherent economic narrative as Treasury spokesman. While Ms Ley was the deputy Liberal leader under Mr Dutton, some MPs argue she was sidelined from his inner sanctum and would be the Coalition’s best hope of winning back affluent seats lost to the teals and Labor over the past two terms. Coalition MPs told The Australian there needed to be a policy fight early in the next term of parliament, arguing the opposition should have done this after losing in 2022. “We haven’t had the policy debates,” one MP said. There are Liberal MPs who say it was a big mistake to pursue cult-like unity rather than getting the policies right, with Mr Dutton’s leadership marked with a zero-tolerance of any MP who spoke against the party position.

 

>>22989242 Video: Jewish leaders congratulate Labor on win, hail Greens’ ‘electoral punishment’ - Jewish leaders have praised voters for the “electoral punishment” given to the Greens, while hailing the re-election of Anthony Albanese and Labor’s historic return to government in a thumping landslide. Tensions between Australia’s Jewish community and the Albanese government have deepened since the October 7 Hamas attacks, but with Labor’s return to office, Jewish leaders say there is now a chance to rebuild trust and ensure the government follows through on its promises to combat anti-Semitism. Labor’s Mark Dreyfus, Josh Burns and Mike Freelander, along with Liberal MP Julian Leeser, all retained their seats on election day - a result welcomed by leaders as a sign of support for Jewish representation across party lines. The most Jewish-heavy electorates in the country delivered higher Liberal primary votes and a repudiation of the Greens in Saturday’s election compared to figures from the rest of the country. In the four seats with the highest proportion of Jewish voters, the Liberal primary vote fell by just 0.4 percentage points, 3.4 points better than the national average. The Greens’ primary vote dropped by 1.7 points across these seats, also outperforming the national slump. Zionist Federation of Australia president Jeremy Leibler described the election as taking place during a “deeply painful period” for Jewish Australians, with many in the community experiencing unprecedented levels of insecurity. Prominent Israeli community leader Menachem Vorchheimer also said the election marked a “clear rejection of the Greens”. Mr Vorchheimer, who hit the Greens with a human rights complaint alleging failures to address overt anti-Semitism at anti-Israel protests they attended, said the minor party was now “hanging by a thread”.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:35 a.m. No.23252112   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 13

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 13

>>22989251 Analysis: The sheer drama of this victory cannot hide the trouble for the future - "Historic. Stunning. Extraordinary. There is no way to convey the sheer drama of this election result without reaching for words that sound overblown. But the victory for Anthony Albanese and his Labor colleagues is an incredible moment. Albanese has shocked many of his own supporters with the scale of their success and the way they have driven Peter Dutton and the Coalition into the ground. The opposition leader has lost his seat in parliament and some of his shadow ministers are heading the same way. The survivors will form a Liberal rump, searching for leadership, and the recriminations will be savage. The story of the campaign is simple: Labor prepared with care and fought with discipline; the Coalition planned complacently and fought atrociously. The story of the election, however, is complex: Labor achieved its goal of increasing its majority - emphatically – but faces a severe challenge in lifting a jaded electorate that is so bruised by the pressure on household finances. Dutton sought to frame Albanese as a weak leader in the worst government since the 1970s, but the polls found that voters returned to Labor and its leader after drifting away last year over the economy. The election twisted all the old attack lines. Albanese outlined a big agenda and threw himself into a strong campaign, while Dutton hedged for too long and presided over a weak and shambolic campaign. If there is a word for this Labor victory, it is certainly not weak. But the campaign drama cannot hide the danger signs for the future. It is not just that Trump is proving that Australia can no longer rely on its great ally - it is that he ushers in an era of economic turmoil and strategic danger. The economy is not robust enough, productivity is not high enough, the budget is not strong enough and our political decisions are not tough enough for the times. Albanese and Chalmers are returned to their jobs with an emphatic victory. But everything at this election proves that their jobs will not get any easier." - David Crowe - theage.com.au

 

>>22992823 Demands for quotas as three post-Dutton leadership options firm - Three senior Liberals are courting support among their colleagues to take over from Peter Dutton as both conservative heavyweight Tony Abbott and leading moderate Simon Birmingham urge the Liberal Party to democratise how it picks candidates. Deputy leader Sussan Ley, shadow treasurer Angus Taylor and immigration spokesman Dan Tehan were all speaking to colleagues on Sunday about a leadership role, according to half a dozen MPs unable to speak publicly about the private discussions. Whoever wins the leadership contest will run a party that has recorded the worst result in its history and is now facing calls for dramatic action, including Birmingham’s demand for the party to introduce “fast and ambitious” quotas to recruit women. As the party reels from a generational loss, two sources close to defence spokesman Andrew Hastie said the West Australian, who had been touted as “leadership material” by colleagues, was unlikely to run and would instead bide his time. Taylor, 59, has the support of the large national right-wing faction and is therefore in the box seat to seize control of the party, even though he has received severe criticism for the opposition’s economic agenda. Tehan managed to fend off a Climate 200-backed challenge in his regional Victorian seat of Wannon, which could bolster his credentials, while Ley’s path to the leadership could be assisted by the NSW moderate faction’s aversion to Taylor, from the state’s right.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:36 a.m. No.23252116   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 14

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 14

>>22992834 Angus Taylor, Donald Trump blamed for Coalition’s devastating defeat - Liberal senator Hollie Hughes has ripped into shadow treasurer Angus Taylor, saying he is incapable of leading the party and failed to deliver any economic ideas for the Coalition’s disastrous election campaign. Party members have flocked to the airwaves on Monday morning to explain why Opposition Leader Peter Dutton suffered a catastrophic loss in Saturday’s election, including his own seat, as the Coalition is expected to fall to fewer than 45 seats in parliament. This masthead reported in June last year the extraordinary rift between Hughes and Taylor as she blamed him for bumping her down on the Senate ticket. The NSW senator quipped on ABC Radio National that, while she is set to leave parliament in June this year, she will have a vote for the next Liberal leader as she slammed Taylor. “We had zero economic policy to sell. I don’t know what [Taylor’s] been doing for three years. There was no tax policy, there was no economic narrative,” she said. Hughes argued that Treasurer Jim Chalmers skated through with no scrutiny from Taylor over the government’s big spending pledges and ballooning deficit. Hughes told Radio National and Sky that, as the former shadow assistant minister for mental health, she had submitted “seven fully costed policies” to the shadow expenditure review committee and never heard back from anyone. “Policies that had been developed, had been costed, just seemed to disappear into a vortex,” she said, adding that she had heard similar stories from colleagues.

 

>>22992843 Video: Trump calls Albanese after saying he had ‘no idea’ who PM’s opponent was in election - US President Donald Trump called Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to congratulate him on his election victory, and the two men had a “warm and positive” conversation canvassing trade and the AUKUS security pact, Albanese said. The phone call paves the way for a future in-person meeting, possibly at next month’s G7 meeting in Canada, which Albanese confirmed he would attend as an invited guest, or in Washington. “I thanked him for his very warm message of congratulations,” Albanese said. “We talked about AUKUS and tariffs. We’ll continue to engage. We’ll engage with each other on a face-to-face basis at some time in the future … I thanked him for reaching out in such a positive way. “I won’t go into all of the personal comments that he made. But he was very generous in his personal warmth and praise towards myself. He was fully aware of the outcome, and he expressed the desire to continue to work with me in the future.” The two spoke by phone about 11am, Canberra time, shortly after Trump returned to Washington from his weekend home in Florida. Upon disembarking the US Marine Corps helicopter at the White House, Trump praised Albanese when asked by this masthead about the Australian election. “Albanese, I’m very friendly with,” Trump said. “I don’t know anything about the election other than the man that won, he’s very good.” Asked about Albanese’s description of Trump’s tariffs as “not the act of a friend”, and whether they would soon speak, Trump said: “I can only say that he’s been very, very nice to me, very respectful to me. “I have no idea who the other person is that ran against him, and, you know, we [Albanese and I] have had a very good relationship.”

 

>>22998090 Video: Federal Election 2025: Teal MP Zoe Daniel loses seat of Goldstein as Sky News calls seat for Liberal candidate Tim Wilson - Teal MP Zoe Daniel has lost her seat of Goldstein, after claiming victory and celebrating too early on election night. Sky News called the closely watched electorate for Liberal candidate Tim Wilson on Tuesday at 2.07pm. The call marks a dramatic reversal of fortune for Ms Daniel, after she declared victory on Saturday night to cheers, confetti, and the sound of Sia’s pop song, Titanium. Ms Daniel's early lead vanished after postal vote counts heavily favoured Mr Wilson, giving him the lead. She posted to social media after falling behind that she would "keep dancing" while awaiting the result. “It’s a resilience test that’s for sure, but no matter what we will keep dancing,” she said. Comments were turned off for the video. Sky News Chief Election Analyst Tom Connell confirmed that with thousands of postal votes breaking decisively for the Liberals, Ms Daniel cannot recover. “The best case scenario for Zoe Daniel right now … would be something like getting within 500 votes,” he said. “Tim Wilson will be returned to parliament, he will be the first Liberal MP to so far gain a seat - not from Labor but from Climate 200.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:37 a.m. No.23252120   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 15

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 15

>>22998096 Video: Greens leader Adam Bandt in danger of losing Melbourne seat as preferencing swings in Labor's favour - Greens leader Adam Bandt is in danger of losing his seat of Melbourne as Liberal preferences look to boost the Labor candidate's chances of claiming victory. A decision by the Liberals to preference the party last may help to see all the Greens' House of Representatives seats turn red, with the Greens leader among those to potentially fall victim. The two-candidate preferred count is currently swaying in Labor candidate Sarah Witty's favour, with a swing of 10.89 per cent and a 985 vote margin over Mr Bandt. The Greens leader came out in top in first preference votes in the seat with 41 per cent, with Ms Witty receiving 31.43 per cent and Liberal’s Steph Hunt getting 18.57 per cent. But Mr Bandt could be in danger if Labor continues to edge higher with help from Liberal Party preferences. Sky News Chief Election Analyst Tom Connell said Ms Witty has a “chance of winning” the seat as Labor will get a “strong preference” from the Liberal Party. “Labor on 31 (per cent) would not be competitive without preferences from the Liberal Party,” Connell said. The Greens are yet to officially win any seats in the 2025 federal election, but the party is having an impact on Labor’s tally, particularly in Brisbane electorates.

 

>>23002826 Video: Greens leader Adam Bandt set to lose seat of Melbourne - Greens leader Adam Bandt is set to lose the seat of Melbourne in a shock defeat that leaves the party in disarray after a series of extraordinary setbacks at the election. Labor claimed victory for its candidate, charity chief Sarah Witty, in the tight contest on Wednesday after gaining more than 53 per cent of the vote so far, but Bandt has not conceded. The Australian Electoral Commission extended its booth-by-booth, two-party preferred count of the seat showing substantial swings to Witty, who was leading against Bandt by more than 2000 votes late on Wednesday afternoon. In the key booth of Richmond, which Labor won 51-49 at the 2022 election, Witty won 61-38. In the nearby Cremorne booth, Witty enjoyed a 15 per cent swing while in Fitzroy - a Greens’ stronghold - she was boosted by a near 9 per cent swing. ABC election analyst Anthony Green said on Wednesday afternoon that based on current voting trends, Bandt would lose the seat. Greens observers said there were as many as 15,000 absentee and declaration votes still to be counted, which meant they were not conceding the seat. Among those outstanding votes are 4000 postal ballots, which Witty is winning 64-36. A Greens spokesperson said the count had to proceed. “While there are many, many thousands of votes to be counted, we are not conceding Melbourne,” the spokesperson said. Bandt achieved one of the greatest victories for the Greens when he won Melbourne from Labor in 2010 and became the first of his party to win a seat in the House of Representatives at a full federal election, beginning a period of growth that led to three other Greens MPs joining him in 2022. His likely defeat is a devastating blow for the party after the loss of Greens housing spokesman Max Chandler-Mather in the Queensland seat of Griffith on Saturday night and the defeat of Greens MP Stephen Bates in the neighbouring seat of Brisbane.

 

>>23002836 History-making Wilson wins in Goldstein, Hamer hopes in Kooyong - Tim Wilson has won Goldstein in a dramatic comeback after building an unassailable lead over teal incumbent MP Zoe Daniel through a postal vote surge. After trailing Daniel by 1800 votes on election night, the Liberal candidate was ahead of the incumbent teal independent MP by 725 votes on Tuesday evening following the latest count update in Goldstein. Wilson’s victory has wider significance for the Liberal Party as it reels in the wake of Saturday’s disastrous election loss to Labor. Wilson was a prominent and energetic member of the Morrison government who led the attack on Labor’s then franking credits policy, and has previously campaigned strongly on free speech. He is also a rare moderate urban Liberal in a party room in the throes of selecting a replacement for Peter Dutton as leader. In another teal versus Liberal contest, Kooyong challenger Amelia Hamer is riding a postal vote surge that is eating away at the lead of incumbent independent Monique Ryan. Ryan leads Hamer 50.5 per cent to 49.5 per cent on a two-candidate-preferred basis. That equates to about 1002 votes based on figures published by the Australian Electoral Commission at 4.30pm on Tuesday. That margin has decreased from about 1400 votes on Monday night with 10,009 votes in the pile yet to be counted, 8564 of which are postal votes.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:37 a.m. No.23252123   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 16

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 16

>>23002844 Liberals revolt over policy failures as Sussan Ley is ‘pragmatic’ frontrunner for leader - A raft of Liberal policies across ­environment, health, defence, tax and education were either not released or held back so long that they “barely saw the light of day”, insiders have revealed, as Sussan Ley emerges as the “pragmatic” frontrunner over Angus Taylor in the race to be the next leader. Coalition insiders said policies worked on for years that would have laid out how the opposition would “halve” approval times for environmental projects and address the defence force’s personnel crisis were spiked by Peter Dutton’s office and Liberal HQ, while proposals in portfolios such as education were held up for months until it was almost too late to spruik them to voters. “People in the policy unit or whatever you want to call it thought they knew better than everyone else,” one senior Liberal source said. The Australian understands defence spokesman Andrew Hastie was effectively shut out of policy development in his portfolio by Mr Dutton, a former defence minister, who Liberal sources claim leaned instead on an Institute of Public Affairs policy blueprint funded by Gina Rinehart - a longtime detractor of Mr Hastie. “Most decisions came from four or five people, Peter (Dutton), Angus (Taylor) and a few in the Senate, like (James) Paterson,” one Liberal MP said. Tasmanian senator Jonathon Duniam on Tuesday became the latest Liberal to blast the handling of the election by the Coalition’s campaign headquarters. “Many of us on the ground right across the country, (including) me here in Tasmania, saw some pretty alarming signs, which we fed in but were ignored,” Senator Duniam told Sky News.

 

>>23002853 Analysis: Beware the landslide - Ardern’s lesson for victorious Albanese - "Watching Australia’s 2025 federal election from Wellington gave me an uncanny sense of deja vu. As Labor swept to power with a commanding parliamentary majority and the Coalition suffered its worst defeat in generations, I could not help but think: “I have seen this movie before.” New Zealand’s Labour Party swept to power in 2020 with the first single-party majority under our proportional representation system. Jacinda Ardern secured 50 per cent of the vote while ­National collapsed to 26 per cent - their worst result in decades. Three years later, Labour was unceremoniously ejected. How could fortunes reverse so dramatically? And what might this mean for Anthony Albanese’s triumphant Labor Party? The Australian results mirror New Zealand’s 2020 election. Labor now commands nearly 90 seats in the 151-seat House of Representatives. The Coalition lies shattered, with Peter Dutton losing his seat. In Melbourne, Adelaide and Brisbane, Liberal representation has virtually disappeared, a blood-bath of historic proportions. After such a victory, Labor’s strategists must feel the intoxicating pull of ambition. Why not seize this moment to fundamentally reshape Australia? New Zealand’s experience offers a sobering answer. Ardern’s government, drunk on its parliamentary majority, embarked on an ambitious agenda of structural reforms that nobody had actually voted for. Consider their “Three Waters” program - a classic case of centralist overreach. Councils would be forced to relinquish control of water assets to new mega-entities with complex co-governance arrangements with Maori. In reality, it exemplified bureaucratic empire-building and sparked nationwide backlash. No matter how overwhelming the majority, governments ultimately face the most effective constraint: the judgment of ordinary citizens, concerned more with results than rhetoric, willing to discard yesterday’s political ­heroes when the results do not match the promises. That is both the frustration and glory of democracy - a lesson New Zealand’s Labour learned the hard way. Australia’s Labor Party might believe they are different. They are not." - Oliver Hartwich, executive director of The New Zealand Initiative - theaustralian.com.au

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:38 a.m. No.23252124   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 17

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 17

>>23007391 Ley gets backing from party elders as Liberal leadership battle grows hostile - Liberal deputy leader Sussan Ley has won support from three former Liberal premiers in the quest to lead the party out of its sweeping defeat, with Jeff Kennett, Nick Greiner and Barry O’Farrell naming her as the best choice. The former premiers went public with their support as another senior Liberal, former party president Shane Stone, also named Ley as the best leader to win back voters who deserted the party at the ballot box. Others are throwing their support behind the shadow treasurer, Angus Taylor, in a contest that threatens ongoing stability by pitting conservatives against moderates in an increasingly hostile leadership battle, with files circulated highlighting rival weaknesses. Kennett, who was premier of Victoria from 1992 to 1999, said the Liberals had a chance to rebuild within three years if they learnt the lessons from what he called the “amateurish” campaign to the federal election. “I am not one of those who believe that the future for the party is lost or necessarily will take two elections before we are again a viable alternative,” he said. “I would very much endorse Sussan Ley coming in as the leader. Why do I say that? One, I like the fact that as deputy, she was a loyal deputy. Secondly, she has a great deal of parliamentary experience. She’s a very rounded person. My experience over life is that women are more consultative, they listen more, they think more than a lot of men. I’m not suggesting she should be the next leader because she’s female - I’m saying it’s because I think she’s the best person for the job.”

 

>>23007424 Jacinta Price defects to Liberals to run as Taylor’s deputy in leadership bid - Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price will run as shadow treasurer Angus Taylor’s deputy in the battle for the Liberal Party leadership against Sussan Ley, after her shock defection from the National Party on Thursday afternoon. The move has effectively blown apart the Coalition, angering Liberal moderates hoping current deputy leader Sussan Ley would replace Peter Dutton as opposition leader and devastating the National Party. Price only phoned Littleproud as she released a statement announcing her move, according to two sources familiar with Price who were unauthorised to speak publicly. The late call was designed to head off any attempt by Littleproud to thwart the switch. As a member of the Country Liberal Party, the Northern Territory’s merged division of the Coalition, she can sit in either the National or Liberal party rooms in Canberra, but it is unclear if the CLP itself gets to decide where Price sits. The move gives Price a vote in the tight contest between Taylor and Ley, which one Liberal MP supporting Ley described as a “desperate branch stack” and a “hostile takeover by the National Party”. Sources close to Taylor, unable to speak publicly, said Price may run as Taylor’s deputy when the party room meets on Tuesday to elect a new leader. The shadow treasurer’s camp believes her star power in the party room and with the base will make Taylor’s ticket hard to resist. Former prime minister Tony Abbott played a key role convincing Price to move. The senator, who is hugely popular among conservatives, had been interested in joining the Liberal Party last term. She has also been courted by Liberals to run for a lower house seat, but that is not on the cards immediately.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:38 a.m. No.23252125   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 18

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 18

>>23007443 Ed Husic, Mark Dreyfus axed in factional power play as Albanese prepares new ministry - Labor faction leaders have cut down two cabinet ministers in a brutal display of caucus power, forcing out Industry Minister Ed Husic and Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus and sparking anger from MPs at the “chaos and disunity” days after the federal election. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has accepted the outcome despite promising stability at the election, but caucus members were dismayed at the way the faction leaders forced the issue, with the Right faction deciding it would not support two of its most senior members. Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, the most senior member of the Right, led a push from Victorian colleagues to gain more sway at the top of the government and promote younger members aligned with his faction. The moves triggered anger from NSW Right MPs at Marles and his loyalists over the shock changes, which they said compromised the unity and stability of the government in the first days of its second term. “How do we explain this to the public? It looks like chaos and disunity to knife two ministers whose performance has never been in question,” one NSW MP said. The fiery meeting of the national Right was repeatedly delayed on Thursday afternoon as deals were hashed out, and several MPs spoke out against the plan to remove Dreyfus and Husic. Another member of the Right, western Sydney MP Mike Freelander, said the outcome “beggars belief” because of the quality of the two ministers, praising Dreyfus in particular. “It’s disgraceful, it’s stupid and it’s wrong,” he told this masthead. “It’s an ill wind that blows through this place - two highly-performing ministers being replaced by union hacks.”

 

>>23007460 Defeated Adam Bandt likens climate change to ‘invasion’ as Peter Dutton cites voter ‘disgust’ at Greens - Former Greens leader Christine Milne has warned her devastated party it needs to focus on core green issues if it is to be effective in the new parliament, as a vanquished Adam Bandt called on the left to treat climate change like an “invasion”. Mr Bandt’s concession of defeat in the seat of Melbourne leaves his deputy, Mehreen Faruqi, and senators Larissa Waters and Sarah Hanson-Young jostling ahead of a leadership vote to lead a party left with only one lower-house member. Mr Bandt lashed the major parties on Thursday, calling for climate change to be treated like a “war” and blamed “One Nation and Liberal preferences” for his defeat as Labor’s campaign machine celebrated its second party leader scalp. Also on Thursday, Peter Dutton cited rejection of anti-Semitism as a reason for Mr Bandt losing the seat of Melbourne to Labor’s Sarah Witty, who is a foster carer and is chief executive of the Nappy Collective, a charity providing nappies to needy families. “No spin by Adam Bandt can change the reality that he, and other Green members, lost their seats because of their appalling treatment of the Jewish community,” the former Liberal opposition leader tweeted on Thursday afternoon. “Australians were rightly disgusted at their behaviour. We were proud to preference the Greens last, helping to ensure Adam Bandt’s loss.” During Mr Bandt’s concession speech on Thursday, he blamed Mr Dutton as a reason why the Greens have lost seats, saying many Australians had voted Labor as the “best option to stop Dutton.”

 

>>23012428 Jacinta Nampijinpa Price’s defection kills off any potential Taylor-Ley leadership peace deal - A bloody civil war threatens to engulf the federal Liberal Party beyond next Tuesday’s vote to replace Peter Dutton, after Angus Taylor orchestrated the high-profile defection of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from the Nationals to bolster his numbers. The Australian can reveal efforts to broker a peace deal between Acting Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and Mr Taylor have been abandoned, with Liberal MPs fearing a tight vote would split the party and undermine the authority of the winning candidate. Ahead of a Tuesday showdown in Canberra next week, the fight between Ms Ley and Mr Taylor turned ugly as Senator Price quit the Nationals and Liberals conceded that toxic factional NSW Liberal Party brawling had now been transplanted into the federal parliamentary team. Mr Taylor’s move to recruit Senator Price triggered anger from senior Nationals, including Matt Canavan, who compared his former colleague with Lidia Thorpe. The Nationals could now lose its major party status in the Senate after Senator Price’s defection and Nationals deputy leader Perin Davey’s failure to win re-election. The party’s numbers in the upper house will now shrink to four. The Australian understands Senator Price did not consult with Nationals colleagues before she quit.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:38 a.m. No.23252129   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 19

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 19

>>23012474 NT Nationals weigh retribution against Price for defection to Liberals - Both Coalition parties have been plunged into open warfare by conservative senator Matt Canavan’s challenge for the Nationals leadership and party officials weighing up dropping Jacinta Nampijinpa Price from their Senate ticket for defecting to the Liberals to support Angus Taylor. Canavan’s unlikely push to oust David Littleproud means the Nationals and Liberals will hold leadership duels on Monday and Tuesday, respectively, after Taylor and Sussan Ley on Friday declared their candidacy for the Liberal role. Price’s move from the Nationals to the Liberals has ramifications for both leadership contests and could reduce the salary and office entitlements of at least one Nationals senator, infuriating her colleagues. According to parliamentary rules, parties need at least five senators to have a party whip - who is responsible for party discipline, paid more and has a larger office – but Price’s departure combined with Nationals senator Perrin Davey’s loss in the election takes the party to four. Price, the popular but controversial Indigenous senator, declared on Thursday she would shift to the Liberal Party and is expected to run as Taylor’s deputy. Four Coalition sources, unable to speak publicly about internal party workings, said the Country Liberal Party, which Price represents in the Northern Territory, was considering whether to disendorse Price or opt not to pick her as a candidate at the next election.

 

>>23012489 Queensland senator Matt Canavan to challenge David Littleproud as senior Nationals warn: if Coalition splits, so be it - Queensland Nationals senator Matt Canavan, a minister in the Turnbull and Morrison governments, is challenging for the leadership of the National Party, deepening the crisis in the crushed Coalition and increasing the rift with the Liberals. Senator Canavan will challenge incumbent leader David Littleproud in a partyroom meeting in Canberra on Monday with an appeal for the Nationals to fight for themselves and their supporters in the face of Liberal Party losses and the defection of Jacinta Nampijinpa Price to the bigger Coalition partner. Senior Nationals are accusing the Liberals of not behaving like true partners and of betraying the faith of the Country Liberal Party and their supporters, and blame the Liberals for the extent of the loss, warning that if the Coalition should split then “so be it”. One senior National MP said Senator Nampijinpa Price’s defection on Thursday to the Liberal Party would “have an effect on the Coalition agreement”, with the future of the agreement now in question and due to be discussed at the next National Party federal management meeting. Senator Canavan told The Australian: “On Monday, I plan to stand for the leadership of the Nationals party to bring back our fighting spirit. Only if we fight, will we have a fighting chance.”

 

>>23020102 Video: Dumped cabinet minister says Richard Marles a 'factional assassin', and demotion partly due to outspoken views on Gaza - Dumped cabinet minister Ed Husic says his decision to speak out on the conflict in Gaza was partly to blame for him being dropped from the frontbench, while making an extraordinary accusation that the deputy prime minister acted as a "factional assassin" out of naked ambition for his branch. Mr Husic told Insiders his experience in cabinet was that Labor had to be "encouraged" to speak out on the issue, but said he would not be silent on it. "To be able to take part in a cabinet meant a great deal. You can't celebrate diversity and expect it to sit in a corner silent," Mr Husic said. "I certainly took the view you need to speak up for the communities you care about. I certainly tried to help us navigate wretchedly difficult issues, such as Gaza post the horrors of October 7. "I don't think I could ever stay silent in the face of innocent civilians slaughtered in tens of thousands, starved out of Gaza." The outgoing minister also lashed out at Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles, who had a hand in Mr Husic being booted from the frontbench. "I think people, when they look at a deputy prime minister, they expect to see a statesman, not a factional assassin," he said. "The difficult issue here is that we've had bare-faced ambition and a deputy prime minister wield a factional club to reshape the ministry." He added that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese should have intervened to stop the factional play, but failed to do so.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:39 a.m. No.23252130   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 20

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 20

>>23024096 Talent over factions: Angus Taylor and Sussan Ley promise to end the Liberal civil war and fight PM - Angus Taylor has pledged to ­reward talent over factional allegiances, elevate more women into leadership positions and make the Liberal Party campaign machine “fitter, flatter, faster and more ­focused” ahead of his showdown with Sussan Ley on Tuesday. In an interview with The Australian, the opposition Treasury spokesman said the Coalition must focus on policies that “go for growth” and allow a full range of technologies to deliver “the ­affordable, reliable energy Australians want”. Mr Taylor and Ms Ley - who spent Mother’s Day at home with their families on Sunday – are locked in a tight contest to ­replace Peter Dutton as opposition leader. The combatants and their supporters will hit the phones on Monday as they seek to win over undecided colleagues ahead of the federal Liberal Party parliamentary team voting for a new leader and deputy leader in Canberra on Tuesday morning. In a video statement released by Ms Ley on the weekend, the Acting Opposition Leader said “we have enormous depth of talent in our partyroom, and I want to draw on all of it over the next three years”. “We will develop strong policy offerings through robust party room processes so we can demonstrate we will deliver better outcomes for all Australians. We need to change, the Liberal Party must respect modern Australia, reflect modern Australia and represent modern Australia,” Ms Ley said. ‘My election as leader of the Liberal Party would send a very strong signal that we understand that things must be done ­differently.” Responding to concerns raised by some Liberal MPs about NSW factionalism infecting the federal partyroom, Mr Taylor said “our numbers are now so depleted that if we start selecting what roles people play based on tribal allegiances we will not succeed, full stop”.

 

>>23024121 Video: Albanese makes big changes, unveils new Plibersek role in major reshuffle - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will fly to Rome within days to join world leaders at the inauguration mass for Pope Leo XIV, after overhauling federal cabinet by naming new ministers to workplace relations, environment and social services. A day after Husic called Deputy Prime Minister and Defence Minister Richard Marles a “factional assassin” for removing colleagues, Albanese played down the internal strife by saying the reshuffle followed the usual process in the Labor caucus to choose the frontbench. Albanese promised an “ambitious agenda to change this country for the better” and noted that Labor would have the largest federal caucus since federation, with at least 92 seats. The Coalition has only 41 seats in the latest counting. In a sign of the scale of the changes, Tanya Plibersek has been moved sideways from her old portfolio of environment to become minister for social services, a key task after past departmental scandals over robo-debt and income support. Albanese has installed Queensland senator Murray Watt as minister for environment and water at a time when the government wants to restart talks with the Greens to pass a stalled bill to set up an agency to oversee project approvals, the environment protection agency. Amanda Rishworth, former minister for social services, becomes minister for employment and workplace relations to replace Watt.

 

>>23024135 David Littleproud remains as Nationals leader, seeing off Matt Canavan challenge - David Littleproud will continue as federal leader of the Nationals after a party room vote in Canberra, seeing off a challenge from his colleague Matt Canavan. Mr Littleproud, who became leader in 2022, was approved to continue by his colleagues in the closed-door ballot, after an election which saw the minor party go backwards by one seat in each house. The margin has not been disclosed. Kevin Hogan was chosen as deputy leader and Bridget McKenzie remained as Senate leader. Mr Hogan was the opposition trade spokesperson in the last parliament, and Senator McKenzie was infrastructure spokesperson. "It's a great honour to lead our great party. I'm proud of our achievements over the last three years, three years where I think we set the policy agenda," Mr Littleproud said after the meeting. National Party rules see the leadership "spilled" automatically after each election, even if there is no rival. But the conservative Senator Canavan revealed late on Friday he would nominate, saying the party needed to be "louder" in opposition to climate targets.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:39 a.m. No.23252131   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 21

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 21

>>23024162 Liberal candidate for Kooyong Amelia Hamer concedes defeat to teal MP Monique Ryan - Liberal candidate Amelia Hamer has formally conceded defeat to teal MP Monique Ryan in the seat of Kooyong, saying the remaining ballots would not be enough to secure her victory. In a statement released on Monday afternoon, Ms Hamer said she had phoned Dr Ryan to congratulate her on her re-election and praised the “beautiful local community” of Kooyong. “Whilst counting continues, it is now clear that the remaining ballots will not deliver us the majority we need to win the seat,” Ms Hamer said. “Standing as the Liberal candidate for Kooyong has been an honour.” The contest in the once blue-ribbon Liberal stronghold has been closely watched following Dr Ryan’s 2022 win over then-treasurer Josh Frydenberg. “Liberal values - like individual freedom, equality of opportunity, and free enterprise – are timeless. They are worth fighting for,” Ms Hamer said. “We are so lucky to have a beautiful local community, a fair democracy, and a wonderful country. I hope to play my small part in making it a better place, now and into the future.” Dr Ryan claimed victory of the seat in an official statement released shortly after Ms Hamer’s announcement. “Serving as the member for Kooyong has been the privilege of a lifetime. I’m incredibly honoured to continue in this role, and thank the electorate for this opportunity,” she said.

 

>>23027918 'We have to have a fresh approach':Sussan Ley becomes first woman to lead Liberal Party after defeating Angus Taylor- Sussan Ley has promised a fresh approach for the Liberals after defeating Angus Taylor to become the first woman to lead the party in its 81-year history. Ley, the moderate candidate who was deputy under Peter Dutton for the last three years, narrowly saw off conservative shadow treasurer Taylor 29 votes to 25 in this morning's party room meeting. "We have to have a Liberal Party that respects modern Australia, that reflects modern Australia, and that represents modern Australia," Ley said following her victory. "And we have to meet the people where they are. And that's what I am committed to doing and what I am determined to do. "I want to do things differently, and we have to have a fresh approach." Ley will become not just the first woman to lead the Liberals, but also the first to be federal opposition leader - from either party – in Australian history. Ted O'Brien, one of the most strident supporters of the Coalition's nuclear plan in his former role as shadow energy spokesperson, was elected her deputy. He defeated surprise candidate Phil Thompson 38 votes to 16. Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, who had made a controversial defection from the Nationals to the Liberal Party late last week to stand for the deputy leadership under Taylor, didn't officially nominate for the deputy position after Taylor had been defeated. Price later said Taylor's defeat was the reason she didn't contest the position. She congratulated Ley on her election and said she would work with her and O'Brien, but also admitted the decision wasn't what she wanted. "While I am disappointed Angus Taylor was not elected leader, I respect the decision made by my colleagues within the party room today," Price said.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:40 a.m. No.23252132   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 22

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 22

>>23032017 Australian Electoral Commission investigates after missing ballot papers found at election worker's home - Almost 2,000 ballot papers went missing on election night and were later recovered from the Sydney home of a temporary Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) worker, the ABC can reveal. While the AEC said the incident did not affect the result in the seat of Barton because the votes had already been counted, it has not explained how the ballots ended up at the worker's home and has launched an investigation. The AEC confirmed the worker collected a secure container holding 1,866 House of Representatives votes from a polling booth in the Sydney suburb of Hurstville after polls closed on May 3, but failed to deliver it to the commission's central counting centre. "Ballot papers were securely packaged in the presence of scrutineers with an authorised transport officer collecting two ballot paper transport containers for delivery to a central counting centre to await further processing," an AEC spokesperson said in a statement. "The staff member responsible erroneously returned one less container than was expected." Officials at the AEC only noticed the container was missing when they began a routine recount of votes in the electorate last week. "The AEC's tracking processes for ballot paper transport containers identified that one of the two transport containers for the Hurstville polling place was not returned to the central counting centre on election night as it should have been," the spokesperson said. The AEC recovered the container early last week. "This issue relates to a single transport container that remained sealed and intact and has not affected the election," the AEC said. "The uniquely coded security seals were not broken, and the AEC's purpose-built ballot paper transport container was intact. "All ballot papers are accounted for. The AEC takes ballot paper handling extremely seriously." The AEC was not able to provide details about where in the worker's home the container was found. "It was obtained from the individual's home where it was collected by permanent AEC staff," the spokesperson said. "The only specific detail I have regarding the collection is that it was obtained during a conversation outside the staff member's house, following identification of the custody of the container." The commission has launched an investigation into the matter but declined to say whether it had referred the incident to law enforcement agencies.

 

>>23032019 Sussan Ley reframes herself as supporter of Israel - Sussan Ley has lashed Anthony Albanese’s response to the Middle East conflict as a major threat to “social cohesion” and asserted her support for Israel, as she sought to distance herself from her past pro-Palestinian views. In her first public address as Opposition Leader, Ms Ley said while she was still a “steadfast friend” of Palestinians, and criticised their leaders for “letting them down”, she had changed her views on the conflict. Ms Ley, a former co-chair of the Parliamentary Friends of Palestine group, said she now saw the issues through a “different prism” after a trip to Israel, a move that has been praised by Jewish leaders. Ms Ley said in 2008 that Palestinians are “airbrushed out of existence”, but on Tuesday declared it was one of the “great privileges” of age that she could re-examine her views after the issue had been “thoroughly ventilated” with her colleagues. “Following my appointment as deputy, I took a trip at the invitation of Julian Leeser, an outstanding colleague and dear friend, to Israel,” Ms Ley said. “I spent a lot of time seeing what was happening on the ground. The impact of that trip and the changed geopolitical circumstances of the Abraham Accords, with Israel reaching out for peace to Saudi and Morocco, and then, of course, the hideous events of October 7 in Gaza, have changed my thinking on the entire subject.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:40 a.m. No.23252134   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 23

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 23

>>23032025 Jacinta Price ‘chickened out’ of deputy vote, say infuriated and blindsided Angus Taylor backers - Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price shocked the allies who brought her into the Liberal Party when she did not put her hand up to run as deputy once her running mate, Angus Taylor, lost the leadership ballot against Sussan Ley. Price had not told anyone in Taylor’s camp that she would only run if Taylor won, prompting fellow conservative Phillip Thompson to nominate on the spur of the moment to fill the gap. The Northern Territory senator’s defection from the Nationals to the Liberals last week to run on Taylor’s ticket caused bad blood between the Coalition partners and alarmed Liberal moderates worried that the maverick politician did not have the experience for the role, having been in parliament for just three years. But senior Liberals, including Tony Abbott, engineered the move believing she would energise the party’s base. But in Tuesday’s meeting in Canberra, Price failed to put her hand up when nominations for the deputy position opened. Energy spokesman Ted O’Brien, who supported Ley as leader, immediately declared his candidacy for the deputy spot when nominations opened at 10.17am. Price, according to several MPs in the room, turned to look towards a section of the opposition party room where her Right faction allies, including Andrew Hastie and others, were seated. She shook her head, the MPs said, indicating she would not be running. Last-minute nominee Thompson, an up-and-coming 37-year-old from Townsville, lost the ballot to O’Brien by 38 votes to 16, but his conservative allies were relieved that he chose to create a contest and represent his Right faction. “She totally f*cked us,” one supporter of Taylor said of Price’s blindsiding.

 

>>23032032 Andrew Hastie declares ‘desire to lead’ the Liberal Party - Andrew Hastie has declared his “desire to lead” the Liberal Party, revealed the de-industrialisation of Australia keeps him up at night and warned about the power of big tech and corporates in a podcast with a Labor-aligned think tank. In a 50-minute podcast recorded on Tuesday after Sussan Ley pipped Angus Taylor for the Liberal Party leadership, Mr Hastie outlined his vision to connect with younger voters and focus on the four enterprise institutions of family, the home, education and small business. Speaking on the Curtin’s Cast podcast with John Curtin Research Centre executive director Nick Dyrenfurth and RedBridge Group pollster Kos Samaras, the 42-year-old cited his young family and the pressures of commuting from Western Australia as reasons he decided not to run for leadership. In the immediate aftermath of the Coalition’s May 3 election bloodbath, the former Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security chair and Special Air Service regiment officer was touted for leadership by senior Liberal figures after he secured primary and two-party preferred swings in his outer-metropolitan Perth seat of Canning. While Liberal MPs in capital cities across the country lost their seats, Mr Hastie increased his margin. Mr Hastie, the son of a Presbyterian minister and public school teacher, who has three children with wife Ruth aged between three and nine, said he was focused on understanding the “problem that we’re facing as a party”. “Leadership is going to come in many forms over the next three years. Susan Ley has just made history as the first female leader of the Liberal Party. That’s a really important role,” Mr Hastie told the Curtin’s Cast podcast. “But leadership can’t be confined to just the position. We’ve also got to lead in the battle of ideas as well. And I think that’s where I want to make a contribution. I’d be foolish to say I don’t have a desire to lead. I do have a desire to lead. But the timing was all out for personal reasons. A really important thing in politics is to know where you stand. And I came to that conclusion very quickly.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:40 a.m. No.23252138   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 24

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 24

>>23032040 ‘Swamp creature’ exit: Babet to quit politics after praising Kanye West’s Heil Hitler track, slamming ‘mentally ill’ left - United Australia Party senator Ralph Babet says he’ll quit politics in 2028 to avoid becoming a “swamp creature” - but not before unleashing a late-night ­tirade in which he endorsed Kanye West’s Heil Hitler track and said he’d rather associate with neo-Nazis than “mentally ill” left-wing Australians. The Victorian senator, who has a history of incendiary social media posts, told his followers in an Instagram story that the American rapper’s song Heil Hitler was his favourite of the week. “All I said was it was a good song, right?” Senator Babet said. “I like Kanye West. He’s a great artist … If someone else doesn’t like what he puts out, don’t buy it. Don’t listen to it. But don’t you fcking dare tell me what I can and can’t listen to.” He rejected accusations of anti-Semitism and said attempts to label him a Nazi were “fcking bullshit”. “If they’re going to try and associate me with being a Nazi - a brown immigrant from Africa – that’s f*cking bullshit. You know it. I know it,” he said. West, who also goes by the name “Ye”, became one of the most influential musicians of his generation, until he made no secret of his admiration for Adolf Hitler in a series of social media posts on Elon Musk’s X platform. The multi-award winning artist released a video for Heil Hitler on his X account last week and received more than 8½ million views from his 33 million loyal ­followers.

 

>>23035918 Larissa Waters chosen as new Greens leader - Larissa Waters has been chosen as the new federal Greens leader, replacing Adam Bandt. The Greens held a party room meeting in Melbourne today to select a leader following the shock loss of Adam Bandt. The race was between Mehreen Faruqi, Sarah Hanson-Young and Senator Waters. A Greens source told the ABC the role was decided by "consensus". Senator Faruqi, who is from New South Wales, was chosen as deputy and Senator Hanson-Young, from South Australia, was chosen as manager of business in the Senate. "I feel so strengthened by the sentiment of the room and by this amazing team," Senator Waters told reporters after the meeting. "We've got a lot of work to do because people are really hurting and the planet is hurting, and we need a parliament that actually delivers for people and has the courage and the boldness and the heart to deliver some help to people." A disappointing election campaign saw the minor party lose three of its four seats in the lower house after a modest drop in its national share of the first preference vote. But the party will again exert significant influence in the Senate, where it has retained its 11 seats and is likely to be in the balance of power, meaning Labor could pass legislation with its support alone.

 

>>23035926 Greens new leader Larissa Waters, deputy Mehreen Faruqi double down on Gaza - Newly elected Greens leader Larissa Waters and deputy Mehreen Faruqi insist the party will maintain its focus on the Gaza war, as both senators said they would continue to condemn “genocide” in the war-torn territory. The party’s 12 members spent almost two hours in a meeting on Thursday to decide the leadership structure after former leader Adam Bandt lost his Melbourne seat to Labor at the election on May 3. The Greens lost three of its four House of Representatives seats - including the stunning defeat of Bandt – at the poll, as its national primary vote flatlined and party elders called into question the Greens’ “hypermilitant” agenda and the way it communicates with Australian voters. But after the meeting to decide the leadership on Thursday, Waters and Faruqi warned the Albanese government that the minor party would not take a backward step, seeking to deliver an ultimatum to Labor about who it should work with in the Senate. “We will always be there calling out atrocities, calling out a genocide and standing strong on social justice and human rights,” Waters said. “The Labor Party have a choice. They can work with us … and help people and protect nature, or they can choose to work with the Coalition. They’re going to need to pick because they don’t have the numbers in the Senate to pass the legislation that they want to work on.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:41 a.m. No.23252140   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 25

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 25

>>23053614 Sussan Ley: ‘We lost the flag, but we’re ready for a new season’ - "If you are one of the millions of dedicated footy fans, if you have barracked for one of our incredible Olympians or if you have been in a stadium cheering on the mighty Tillies, you will know you can’t always be on the winning side. As a Sydney Swans supporter I know after the loss of a grand final, when you get towelled up you don’t give up. You don’t drop your team or your belief in it either. You get a bag of ice, you watch the tapes and you get to work rebuilding. You do the work to come back stronger and faster next season. As someone who has served as an MP for the Liberal Party for almost 25 years, I have experienced both success and defeat. Just days ago we were handed a big loss that we must accept with humility. Despite the result, the Liberal Party remains the most successful political party in Australian history. We have won more flags than any other team. Our party has, more than any other, helped shape Australia into the prosperous, strong and fair society it is today. But we have to face up to the fact that despite our best efforts, we have failed to connect with a changing electorate. Now more than ever, the federal Liberal Party must respect, reflect and represent modern Australia. As leader, I have committed to a full assessment of why we lost the election. The next steps for our party are focused on listening to the community and rebuilding our movement. But we will never shy away from our timeless values, which will always underpin our policy development processes. We are ready to do the work; we are up for it; we will take a good hard look at ourselves. Preseason is about to begin and I know my team is hungry to get to work." - Sussan Ley, Leader of the Opposition - theaustralian.com.au

 

>>23076612 Zoe Daniel calls for Goldstein recount after Tim Wilson wins by 260 votes - Zoe Daniel has requested a recount in Goldstein after counting today arrived at a final margin of 260 votes in favour of Liberal Tim Wilson. The Australian Electoral Commission automatically undertakes a recount if the margin is under 100 votes, but candidates can also request one if they have sufficient grounds. A spokesman for the AEC said the full distribution of preferences was finalised today in favour of Wilson. “A recount request is being considered, and an announcement regarding that decision will be made when able,” he said. Daniel said: “In light of the very tight margin and several errors being picked up in the portion of the count that was included in the distribution of preferences, leading to unusual fluctuations and large numbers of votes moving to and fro in the final stages of the count, I have taken expert advice and asked the AEC to consider whether a full recount is appropriate. “There are also several outstanding questions regarding the broader count which would be resolved by a recount. As always, I will respect the process and await the commission’s decision.” Posting to social media platform X, Wilson said the AEC had confirmed the final Goldstein margin of 260 votes in his favour. “We have continually had a majority of votes for nearly three weeks, and it never fell below 100 which is the threshold for an automatic recount,” he said. Wilson said the votes had been counted at least four times and Liberal and teal volunteers had scrutineered the count. “And now the former MP is asking for a full recount,” he said. “At some point we should respect the professional staff at the [AEC]. I wish Zoe Daniel, her family and staff well in the next chapter. I hope she finds peace.” Daniel initially claimed victory in Goldstein on election night but postal votes came in strongly in Wilson’s favour leading him to claim a win in the seat two weeks ago. However, Daniel did not concede and since then the count in Goldstein has continued, with Daniel narrowing the margin to as little as 128 votes to Wilson at one stage.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:41 a.m. No.23252142   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 26

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 26

>>23083147 Recount in Goldstein after Wilson’s slim margin prompts request by Daniel - There will be a partial recount of votes in Goldstein to ensure confidence in the result and the counting process after a request was made by independent Zoe Daniel, the Australian Electoral Commission has announced. Liberal Tim Wilson recorded a slim margin of 260 votes ahead of Daniel after the final count finished on Saturday. A spokesman for the AEC said the decision to conduct the recount was made after advice from the national election manager to the electoral commissioner “to ensure the greatest level of confidence in the final result and the utmost integrity in the counting process”. The recount will begin on Wednesday and will take up to four days. Wilson said he was relaxed about the recount. “We have been very relaxed about every count and recount to date in Goldstein, as we know the count will deliver the result that reflects the will of the people of Goldstein,” he said. Daniel said given the corrections picked up in the final stages of the distribution of preferences, the AEC had said it was appropriate and reasonable to do an additional check of first preferences. “Once again, I’d like to thank my scrutineers and AEC staff for their diligence and dedication to the democratic process,” she said. The partial recount will involve a re-examination of all first preference ballot papers for Wilson and Daniel, as well as all informal votes, but the full distribution of preferences will not be recounted. “The recount request submitted by independent candidate Zoe Daniel was carefully considered and was instructive but not determinative, and her request for a full recount has not been granted,” the AEC spokesman said.

 

>>23087084 Pro-Voice Liberal says referendum defeat gave the party ‘a false sense of confidence’ - The Coalition’s success in defeating the Voice to parliament referendum gave the Liberal party “a false sense of confidence” about its chances of victory in the federal election, says former shadow attorney-general Julian Leeser, who resigned from his opposition portfolio in 2023 in order to campaign for the referendum. Noting that Prime Minister Anthony Albanese “seemed to lose his way” after the Voice referendum was defeated in all states in October 2023, Leeser told ABC’s Afternoon Briefing that this, combined with Albanese’s poor handling of the local antisemitism crisis, “gave so many in our party a false sense of confidence”. Leeser says he was “shocked” that the internal polling conducted for the Coalition by Freshwater’s Mike Turner used the number of Labor voters who voted no in the referendum in his calculations of a swing against the government, which was instead returned in a landslide and is likely to end up with 94 seats, equalling John Howard’s record in 1996. “On one level, there is nothing wrong with trying to target those Labor voters who voted no in the referendum campaign,” he said, saying Howard targeted those who rejected the republic proposal in 1999, but only to remind them of other issues such as border security. “I thought it was very strange there was such a focus even on the campaign itself,” Leeser said. “Part of the reason my colleagues were successfully defeating the referendum was in 2023 the issue did not seem to be one of top priority for Australian voters. Certainly, in 2025, it was completely irrelevant and I had no idea why the issue kept reappearing in our campaign.” Leeser said he was “completely surprised” by the focus in the last week on Welcome to Country and the Voice. “It indicated we were not in touch with the concerns of ordinary Australians. People were not talking to me about those issues until we raised them; they were concerned about paying the electricity bills, their mortgage, about the future of their children and what sort of jobs they would have in a world where AI will present both threats and opportunities. We were not talking about any of those enough, and instead focused on esoteric issues and I think it indicated a lack of discipline and real focus.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:42 a.m. No.23252144   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 27

2025 Australian Federal Election - Part 27

>>23103516 Tim Wilson officially new member for Goldstein after tight margins saw Zoe Daniel order a recount - A new member for the Melbourne seat of Goldstein has been crowned, four weeks after the federal election. Independent candidate Zoe Daniel demanded a recount after losing the seat to Liberal moderate Tim Wilson by just 260 votes, saying several errors were made during the distribution of preferences. The Australian Electoral Commission finalised the partial recount of 85,000 votes on Saturday confirming Mr Wilson had won with a margin of 175 votes. The former teal independent MP confirmed over social media she had officially conceded the marginal Melbourne seat, throwing jabs at the Liberal Party campaign in the process. In a video to her supporters, the climate-200 backed candidate suggested that “two steps forward is sometimes followed by one back”. “We do not seek to divide to win, we do not shelve our ethics or our principles. We do not resort to attack advertising, misinformation, disinformation, dirty tricks or personal attacks,” she said. “Winning that way is not something to be proud of.” In a statement posted to social media, Mr Wilson said after 29 days of counting the Liberals had 14,697 more first preference votes than the former MP. “I want to thank all Goldstein voters, but particularly the extraordinary effort some went to so their voice was heard,” he said. “Now the recount is finished, the result is clear. It is time to get on with the job and take the voice and values of Goldstein to shape the future of Australia.”

 

>>23139134 Muslim Vote to support candidates in NSW, Victorian elections - A pro-Palestine political movement that failed to win a seat at the May federal election has vowed to push on and support candidates for the upcoming Victorian and NSW state elections. The Muslim Vote endorsed independent candidates in three Labor-held seats - Watson and Blaxland in western Sydney and Calwell in Melbourne’s north-west. Its greatest success was in Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke’s seat of Watson, where independent Ziad Basyouny was the second-most popular candidate on a two-candidate preferred basis. Burke, who was accused of “vote buying” after holding pre-election mass citizenship ceremonies in Sydney’s culturally diverse western suburbs, still comfortably won the seat, receiving 66 per cent of the vote after preferences were distributed. In Education Minister Jason Clare’s seat of Blaxland, Ahmed Ouf won 18.76 per cent of first preferences, but the Liberal candidate was second-preferred. In Calwell, Samim Moslih only garnered 6.85 per cent of first preferences. Despite failing to win a seat, Muslim Vote convenor Sheikh Wesam Charkawi said the results were a “significant step” that “demonstrated the model works”. In each seat, the independent campaign ate into both Labor and the Liberals’ first preference vote distribution from the 2022 federal election. “One form of success in the political arena is unseating the sitting minister. Another form is winning hearts and minds of the masses, setting the foundations for future challenges,” Charkawi said. “We’ve had an avalanche of people reach out to us post-election, either to be candidates or to support our work … The community isn’t backing down. We all want to continue.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:42 a.m. No.23252145   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 28

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 1

>>23058421 Australia rebukes Israel in joint statement demanding aid for starving Gazans - Australia has joined a coalition of 23 countries demanding the full resumption of humanitarian aid into Gaza and accusing Israel of politicising the delivery of essential food and medicine to Palestinian civilians. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Monday that Israel would allow some aid to enter Gaza after a two-month blockade, but international aid organisations say this will not be nearly enough to meet the needs of the local population and will risk the lives of aid workers. Netanyahu has said that Israel will take full control of the strip as he ordered the Israeli military to intensify ground operations in the ravaged strip, including by instructing civilians to leave the southern city of Khan Yunis. Penny Wong and the foreign ministers from 22 other nations said in a joint statement they could not support the limited aid delivery the Israeli government had proposed. “It places beneficiaries and aid workers at risk, undermines the role and independence of the UN and our trusted partners, and links humanitarian aid to political and military objectives,” the foreign ministers said. “Humanitarian aid should never be politicised, and Palestinian territory must not be reduced nor subjected to any demographic change.” Alongside Wong, the foreign ministers who signed the 23-nation joint statement are representatives from Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden and the UK. “As humanitarian donors, we have two straightforward messages for the government of Israel: allow a full resumption of aid into Gaza immediately and enable the UN and humanitarian organisations to work independently and impartially to save lives, reduce suffering and maintain dignity,” the foreign ministers said. “We remain committed to meeting the acute needs we see in Gaza.”

 

>>23083142 ‘People are starving’: Albanese attacks Israel over ‘outrageous’ Gaza food restrictions - Anthony Albanese is coming under growing internal and international pressure to sanction Israel and recognise Palestinian statehood before a major United Nations conference next month, as the prime minister rounded on the Netanyahu government for limiting the delivery of food and other supplies going into Gaza. Israel last week ended its 11-week blockade of aid entering the ravaged strip but the United Nations and leading international charities argue the trickle of supplies is not nearly enough to meet the demands of Gaza’s 2.3 million people. Australia last week joined 23 other nations to condemn Israel for politicising the delivery of humanitarian aid, but did not sign onto a stronger statement by the United Kingdom, France and Canada warning Israel of sanctions if it did not stop settlement building in the West Bank. The three nations also said they were “committed to recognising a Palestinian state as a contribution to achieving a two-state solution and are prepared to work with others to this end”, as they noted the UN is preparing to hold a high-level conference on a two-state solution. “Israel’s actions are completely unacceptable,” Albanese told reporters on Monday, using some of his most forceful language on the issue in recent times. “It is outrageous that there be a blockade of food and supplies to people who are in need in Gaza. We have made that very clear by signing up to international statements.” Albanese said he had expressed his criticisms directly to Israeli President Isaac Herzog when they met in Rome on the sidelines of Pope Leo’s inauguration mass. “I made it very clear that Australia finds these actions completely unacceptable and we find Israel’s excuses and explanations completely untenable and without credibility,” he said. “People are starving.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:43 a.m. No.23252147   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 29

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 2

>>23094549 Israel’s president Isaac Herzog invites Anthony Albanese to Jewish State after Gaza claims - In an effort to preserve relations with Australia, the President of Israel, Isaac Herzog, told an Australian media delegation visiting Jerusalem that he wanted Anthony Albanese to visit Israel to engage first-hand with the problems of the region. The explicit request from President Herzog - well informed on Australian politics – directly challenges the Albanese Government where distaste for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is visceral, with Labor’s preference being to keep its distance from Israel’s executive leader and driver of its Gaza war strategy. The deterioration in Australia-Israel ties is deepening with the Prime Minister’s attack on Israel earlier this week over humanitarian aid saying “Israel’s actions are completely unacceptable,” branding its behaviour “outrageous “and saying that Australia had aligned with other nations in expressing its opposition. In remarks to Australian editors and journalists, President Herzog made clear he would like to see Mr Albanese involved more directly - a sentiment that reflects the ingrained Israeli view that Australia has become both a remote and poorly informed critic of Israel’s Gaza strategy. “I welcome and invite the Prime Minister to visit Israel - absolutely,” President Herzog told the delegation. At the same time the president made clear his willingness to visit Australia as well. This follows a brief exchange between the president and PM in Rome for the recent inauguration of the new Pope, Leo X1V. Albanese has said he made it “very clear” to President Herzog in their Rome meeting that Israel’s failures on humanitarian aid to Gaza were “completely untenable and without credibility” since people were starving and “the idea that a democratic state withholds supply is an outrage.”

 

>>23099049 Video: Radical imam Ahmed Zoud’s apology to Jews one day, call for Allah to kill all ‘oppressors’ the next - An extremist cleric who preached that Jews were “bloodthirsty monsters” who “ran like rats” from the October 7 Hamas attack has formally apologised after Australia’s peak Jewish body lodged a vilification complaint over the ­sermon he delivered in 2023. However, The Australian can reveal that, as recently as last Friday, Sheikh Ahmed Zoud issued a prayer to the people of Gaza at the end of his sermon, for Allah to “deal with the tyrants and the oppressors” and to “kill them all, and leave none of them behind”. While Sheikh Zoud did not mention Jews by name in his latest rant, he had pledged in his apology not to repeat statements that “could be interpreted as targeting Jewish people as a whole”. On Thursday, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry ­welcomed the resolution of its complaint against Sheikh Zoud (also known as Sheikh Zod) to the Australian Human Rights ­Commission following Mr Zoud’s “unreserved” apology. ECAJ co-chief executive Peter Wertheim said the apology to the Jewish community was “a welcome admission of wrongdoing by Ahmed Zoud and we hope that it will serve as an example for the ­future about the limits of freedom of expression”. “We hope that the resolution of this complaint will serve as a ­reaffirmation of the principle that Australia is a safe place for ­people of all backgrounds, and no place for the kind of ­immoderate and at times anti-­Semitic rhetoric that we have ­witnessed in recent times.” Upon learning of Sheikh Zoud’s latest inflammatory remarks, Mr Wertheim told The Australian that, if the imam failed to adhere to his undertakings, “we will have no hesitation in availing ourselves of legal remedies to ­enforce them.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:43 a.m. No.23252149   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 30

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 3

>>23099119 Video: Radical cleric Wissam Haddad slams Muslim leaders - A Sydney Islamic fundamentalist at the centre of a Federal Court battle has accused Muslim leaders of abandoning him in a case he claims pits “Islam against disbelievers”, while urging them to publicly defend the right to quote inflammatory scripture about Jews. Wissam Haddad, who also goes by the name Abu Ousayd and leads the hardline Al Madina Dawah Centre, this week released a video appealing for religious unity ahead of a looming court showdown with the Executive Council of Australian Jewry. The Federal Court proceedings, which are expected to test the limits of religious expression and hate speech laws, centre on whether Mr Haddad’s public sermons - referencing verses in the Koran about Jews – amount to incitement or protected religious expression. The proceedings have been brought by ECAJ co-CEO Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot AO, and allege that Mr Haddad’s public speeches included derogatory generalisations about Jewish people, in which he described them as “vile people” and a “treacherous people”, and claimed they hide like “rats” when fighting Muslim men. In the video posted on Tuesday, Mr Haddad said he was concerned that Muslim leaders were retreating from the right to quote Islamic texts in public. “For the past couple of months I had been struggling, striving, trying to have the Muslim community at large and specifically the sheiks (clerics) and Muslim organisations understand that what I am currently facing in the Federal Court is not an issue of Abu Ousayd or Al Madina Dawah Centre versus the Jewish lobby … rather, it’s a battle between Islam and kuffar (disbelievers),” he said. “They wish to take and make those ayat and hadith (verses in the Koran) and historic accounts that speak about the Jews to what they see as insulting … they seek to make it criminal.”

 

>>23139131 Israeli influencer Hillel Fuld’s visa cancelled for Australian speaking tour - The Albanese government has cancelled the visa of high-profile Israeli-American tech influencer Hillel Fuld, citing concerns that his presence in the country may pose a risk to “the health, safety or good order” of the Australian community, particularly among Muslim Australians. The Department of Home Affairs quietly cancelled Mr Fuld’s travel visa this week, accusing him of using social media to deny “documented atrocities” in Gaza, promote Islamophobic views, and spread inflammatory content that could incite division amid heightened community tensions. Mr Fuld was due to speak at fundraising events in Melbourne and Sydney later this month hosted by Magen David Adom Australia - the local affiliate of Israel’s national emergency medical and blood service. The events were billed as discussions on Israeli innovation and technology, with Mr Fuld expected to share insights on the tech sector and his personal experiences. Funds raised were to go toward the construction of a new ambulance station in southern Israel. But according to departmental records obtained by The Australian, Home Affairs officials concluded that Mr Fuld had a documented pattern of sharing provocative content, including broad attacks on the Palestinian identity, denial of “documented atrocities” in Gaza, and claims that large segments of the Muslim population support terrorism. One post cited in the visa cancellation decision was a March 2024 Instagram video in which Mr Fuld dismissed as “propaganda” reports by international media outlets that Israeli troops had opened fire on starving Palestinians looking for food aid in Gaza, killing over 100.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:43 a.m. No.23252150   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 31

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 4

>>23144540 US pressures Australia over ban on Israeli-American speaker Hillel Fuld - The Albanese government is facing diplomatic pressure from Washington after US ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee personally appealed to Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke to overturn a visa cancellation of Israeli-American tech advocate Hillel Fuld. The rare intervention came hours after The Australian revealed how the Department of Home Affairs quietly cancelled Mr Fuld’s travel visa and accused him of using social media to deny “documented atrocities” in Gaza, promote Islamophobic views and spread inflammatory content that could incite division amid heightened community tensions. In a lengthy email sent directly to Mr Burke, Mr Huckabee described Mr Fuld as a “highly respected” dual US-Israeli citizen who poses “no threat of any kind” to Australia and urged the minister to allow his visit for “the sake of the very important charity event” organised by Magen David Adom Australia. “Mr Fuld is highly respected member in his community and well known in Israel. While he holds strong views against terrorism and the kind of massacre that occurred on October 7, he would pose no threat to the people of Australia by his actions or words,” Mr Huckabee, governor of Arkansas from 1996 to 2007, wrote. “I fully respect the decision to grant the visa is solely in your hands and you have a sovereign right to make the decision to deny entry to someone you consider a threat to national security (but) I do not feel Mr Fuld poses any threat of any kind. I would respectfully request … you would be willing to review his visa application and grant the opportunity to make his brief visit for the sake of the very important charity event for the humanitarian emergency medical service organisation.”

 

>>23152313 Video: Hate-spewing preacher Wissam Haddad’s sword post ahead of court battle with Jewish leaders - Hate preacher Wissam Haddad has ramped up threats on the eve of his legal battle against Australia’s peak Jewish body, warning in a video “we are not going to come unarmed, we’re going to fight them with everything that we have,” followed by the image of a sword. The video has been condemned by Jewish community members who believe it is an incitement to young radicals to commit violence, with Mr ­Haddad set to appear in the Federal Court on Tuesday to defend claims that he breached vilification laws over his sermons asserting Jews are “vile” and “treacherous” people. The provocative post comes as radical American Islamist Sheik Ahmad Musa Jibril exhorts his followers around the world to help fund Mr Haddad’s defence, with a radical Salafi account linked to Sheik ­Jibril claiming the Sydney-based cleric is “one of the most ­targeted men in Australia by the disbelievers”. Mr Haddad, also known as Abu Ousayd, is being sued by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry over alle­gations that he breached the Racial Discrimination Act through his sermons in the wake of the Hamas October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. Mr Haddad or speakers at his Bankstown-based Al Madina Dawah Centre have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing, and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”.

 

>>23152324 Video: Jihadi preacher’s sermons ‘comfort to Muslim congregants’, court hears - Lawyers for Jihadi preacher Wissam Haddad have argued his sermons were given to provide private “comfort” to Muslim congregants, despite accusations he was in active dialogue with reporters as a self-proclaimed “masjid (mosque) shock jock”. Mr Haddad, whose first name is William but who is also known as Abu Ousayd, arrived at court on Tuesday ahead of his racial discrimination hearing, avoiding questions and surrounded by his legal team, as he stares down a four-day trial over alle­gations by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry that he breached the Racial Discrimination Act through his sermons in the wake of the Hamas October 7, 2023 attacks on Israel. Mr Haddad or speakers at his Al-Madina Dawah Centre have called Jewish people “descendants of pigs and monkeys”, recited parables about their killing and said people should “spit” on Israel so its citizens “would drown”. In most cases, he has claimed he was referring to or reciting Islamic scripture.Mr Haddad’s representative, Andrew Boe suggested Mr Haddad throughout his sermons addressed only historical Jewish tribes referenced in the Koran or the state of Israel and the influential figures within it, not the global Jewish diaspora.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:44 a.m. No.23252152   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 32

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 5

>>23152367 Video: Imam Samir Mohtadi’s hate speech from pulpit - A high-profile Victorian Muslim leader who branded Zionists as “scavengers” and “bloodsucking humans” has declared that Australia is waging a war on Islam, as he plans to build a multimillion-dollar Islamic “sanctuary” north of Melbourne. Sheik Abu Hamza, also known as Samir Mohtadi, is spearheading a $6.9m religious development in the fast-growing suburb of Mickleham, where he aims to establish an Islamic facility to cater for the city’s burgeoning Muslim population. But while fundraising millions through his registered charity, the Islamic Information and Services Network of Australasia, Sheik Mohtadi has also launched inflammatory public attacks on Zionists, Australian politicians, the “West” and secular institutions. In a hate-fuelled sermon delivered at the Australian Bosnian Islamic Centre in Melbourne’s west last week, which was attended by The Australian, the prominent imam prayed for victory for “our mujahideen (fighters) in Palestine” and called on Allah to “cast terror into the hearts of the Zionists”. Sheik Mohtadi’s sermon then turned to Australia itself, as he accused the federal government and institutions of waging an ideological “war of no God”. He preached to worshippers that they were not obliged to adopt the values of the country that had hosted them, granted them citizenship, and provided them full political, social, and economic rights - including the freedom of religion. He declared that as long as they had their own values, culture, language, and religion, they did not need to embrace Australia’s.

 

>>23158072 Video: Australia joins UK in sanctioning Israeli ministers over Gaza comments - Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong says there “remains a great deal of strategic alignment” between the US and Australia after the Trump administration condemned the sanctions applied overnight on two right-wing Israeli ministers. Senator Wong did not say whether or not the US was given advance notice that Australia, alongside Canada, New Zealand, Norway and the UK, would impose the sanctions on Israeli national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and finance minister Bezalel Smotrich. The Israeli ministers will face travel bans and have their assets frozen, in a move condemned by Israel as “outrageous”. In a joint statement with other foreign ministers early Wednesday morning, Senator Wong said the two men would be black-listed for “for inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank”. “Settler violence is incited by extremist rhetoric which calls for Palestinians to be driven from their homes, encourages violence and human rights abuses and fundamentally rejects the two-state solution,” she said. The Trump administration condemned Australia and others over the sanctions, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio saying the move will not advance ceasefire efforts, the rescue of hostages, or an end to the war. Mr Rubio urged the five countries to reverse the sanctions, saying in a statement the US “condemns the sanctions imposed by the governments of the United Kingdom, Canada, Norway, New Zealand and Australia on two sitting members of the Israeli cabinet. We reject any notion of equivalence: Hamas is a terrorist organisation that committed unspeakable atrocities, continues to hold innocent civilians hostage, and prevents the people of Gaza from living in peace. We remind our partners not to forget who the real enemy is.”

 

>>23158079 ‘Entirely unacceptable’: Ambassador condemns Australian sanctions on senior Israeli ministers - A diplomatic brawl has broken out between Australia and the US after the Albanese government joined with allies in taking the extraordinary step of sanctioning far-right ministers in the Israeli government on the eve of a peace summit in New York. Highlighting Israel’s growing diplomatic isolation, Australia and the UK spearheaded a months-long push to freeze assets and slap travel bans on Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich over settler violence in the West Bank and advocating for the displacement of Gazans. Australia announced the move in a statement with Five Eyes security partners Canada and New Zealand and the diplomatically influential nation of Norway, in one of the most striking examples of Western pressure on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to wind down Israel’s action in Gaza. The Israeli ambassador to Australia, Amir Maimon, said the Israeli government would meet early next week to determine how to respond. “The decision to impose sanctions on two Israeli cabinet ministers is deeply concerning and entirely unacceptable. These ministers are part of a government that operates under the principle of collective responsibility, making such measures unreasonable,” Maimon said.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:44 a.m. No.23252155   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 33

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 6

>>23163812 Jihadi preacher concedes ‘sermons not private’ in hate speech case - Lawyers for Jihadi preacher Wissam Haddad have conceded a central pillar of their defence, acknowledging the cleric’s sermons were not private amid a racial discrimination trial that has hinged on the public accessibility of his remarks. Mr Haddad, who legally changed his first name to William more than twenty years ago but who is also known as Abu Ousayd, has sought to argue he was only speaking to his Muslim congregants at the Bankstown Al Madina Dawah Centre - a co-respondent in his Federal Court case brought by Executive Council of Australian Jewry co-chief executive Peter Wertheim and deputy president Robert Goot – when he made sermons about the conflict in Israel after October 7, 2023. At the beginning of the case’s closing remarks on Thursday, ECAJ barrister Peter Braham SC said Mr Haddad had conceded the argument and acknowledged his speeches were likely to be seen by an audience outside of his congregation. Mr Haddad’s barrister, Andrew Boe, confirmed this. “We formally communicated to the appellant’s team that the respondents concede that the speeches were not … private,” Mr Boe said. The partial concession means Justice Angus Stewart need only judge Mr Haddad’s potential breach of two other elements of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act - whether Mr Haddad’s sermons were likely to offend and whether they targeted those of a specific race, colour or national or ethnic origin.

 

>>23174845 PM’s meeting with Trump in doubt as Middle East conflict escalates - Anthony Albanese’s first face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump risks being derailed as Israeli strikes on Iran seize global attention ahead of a G7 summit in Canada. Albanese told Australians to avoid the region and pointed to new government advice not to travel to Israel and the occupied Palestinian territories as Iran prepared retaliatory strikes. Speaking in Fiji on Friday before heading to the United States and Canada, the prime minister warned of Iran’s nuclear program, but called for a diplomatic solution. “We, of course, are very conscious of the threat that Iran becoming a nuclear state would represent to peace and security in the region,” Albanese said on Friday. “We want to see these issues resolved through dialogue, and the United States has been playing an important role there.” Despite weeks of commentary about possible talks with Trump on tariffs and defence, a Trump-Albanese meeting had not been formally secured when the prime minister departed on Friday. Trump has not yet confirmed meetings with any world leaders at the G7, which begins on June 15, but Australia was confident it would secure an informal conversation on the sidelines or a bilateral meeting in Canada.

 

>>23182420 Israel’s top diplomat clips Penny Wong for phoning Iranians - Israel’s ambassador to Australia has delivered a veiled barb to Foreign Minister Penny Wong and Western leaders pushing for diplomacy after she revealed she had phoned her Iranian counterpart urging restraint after Israel’s strikes on Iran. Wong has backed Israel’s right to defend itself against Iran’s nuclear program, the expansion of which earned a censure from the international nuclear watchdog before Israel launched an attack on Iran on Friday. Wong has also been dealing with Israeli officials since the conflict broke out. Many other Western leaders have made similar remarks urging diplomatic talks rather than more violence. But she has declined to explicitly endorse Israel’s military action, instead emphasising the need for diplomacy as tit-for-tat barrages continued. “This is precisely the same message I put to [Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi]: that we urge restraint because whatever people’s views about what has occurred to date, what happens tomorrow matters to all peoples in the region,” Wong said on ABC’s Insiders on Sunday. “I directly put to the Iranian foreign minister, ‘We are saying to you, exercise restraint, return to diplomacy and dialogue because continuing to escalate this has consequences’.” Israeli ambassador Amir Maimon, a critic of Australia’s policies on the Middle East, latched onto Wong’s remarks about her call with Tehran, releasing his own statement about an hour after she spoke. The statement did not mention Wong by name but made reference to her calls for diplomacy and suggested such sentiments were unrealistic. “Iran isn’t hiding its intent, it declares it. And it’s building the weapons to fulfil it,” Maimon said. “Through its pursuit of nuclear arms, Iran has turned this into an asymmetric conflict, between a democracy seeking to defend itself and a regime bent on destruction. Yet some still urge diplomacy, as if words can stop warheads.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:44 a.m. No.23252157   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 34

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 7

>>23186849 Hundreds of Australians seek help to leave Israel and Iran - Several hundred Australians have registered interest in leaving Israel and Iran amid escalating hostilities between the two countries, but have been advised to shelter where they are while airspace remains closed. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said 300 Australians had advised the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) of their desire to leave Israel, and 350 Australians had done so for Iran, with more registrations expected. Senator Wong said that while no flights are possible yet given the risk of missile strikes on civilian aircraft, the government was working on "a range of plans" to help people leave when safe. "I understand how concerned, how distressed many Australians are about what is occurring. I understand how particularly those who are in the Middle East, in Israel or Iran, how worrying this situation is, and how frightening it is," she told reporters on Monday. At least 224 people have been killed in Iran and 13 in Israel after several days of strikes. The episode began on Friday, local time, with an Israeli strike on Iran which Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said was an attempt to destroy nuclear facilities behind what he said would be an "existential threat to Israel". It came shortly after the UN nuclear watchdog concluded Iran was in violation of its obligations under the global non-proliferation treaty, and shortly before planned talks with the United States.

 

>>23192221 Conflict cancellation:Albanese’s meeting with Trump cancelled because of Iran-Israel war- Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will have to wait until at least September to take Australia’s case on the AUKUS defence pact directly to Donald Trump, after the US president was forced to leave the G7 summit early to deal with the crisis in the Middle East. The White House confirmed the departure while Albanese was holding a press conference at the summit on issues that he would be discussing with Trump, including trade and AUKUS. Trump’s decision to fly home early is a blow for Albanese, who was due to meet the president face to face for the first time on Wednesday morning (Australian time) to emphasise Australia’s defence contributions as the US reviews the AUKUS submarine deal and calls for more military spending. The government played down the president’s decision to leave, arguing it was understandable against the backdrop of escalating conflict in the Middle East and affected the leaders of Mexico and Ukraine as well. But it leaves Albanese behind numerous other world leaders who have secured time with the president. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on X that Trump had a good day at the G7 and signed a trade deal with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Fox News reported Trump dined with the G7 leaders in Canada, and then immediately left for Washington. Australia, which is not a member of the G7, was not invited to attend the dinner. Albanese was instead invited to a function with the heads of other nations in the same category such as South Korea and Mexico.

 

>>23192231 Video: Donald Trump left G7 before one-on-one with Anthony Albanese - Anthony Albanese's one-on-one meeting with Donald Trump has been abandoned, after the American president departed the three-day G7 summit early citing developments in the Middle East. The planned talks were highly anticipated, particularly after the Trump administration revealed it was reviewing the $368 billion AUKUS submarine deal last week. News of Mr Trump's unexpected departure broke just minutes after the prime minister told a media conference in Calgary that he "looked forward to the meeting and looked forward to it taking place". The face-to-face meeting - which would have been the first between the two leaders - was scheduled to take place on the sidelines of the summit on Wednesday morning. But in a statement posted to social media on Tuesday, US Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said Mr Trump would instead be returning to Washington after dinner. The president had planned to hold other meetings with world leaders, including Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, that were also scrapped. Mr Albanese had previously said he intended to raise the Trump administration's tariffs on Australian exports and the AUKUS partnership during the high-stakes talks. In a statement, a spokesperson for the prime minister said Mr Trump's decision to leave early was understandable "given what is occurring in the Middle East". "As the prime minister said a short time ago, we are very concerned about the events in the Middle East and continue to urge all parties to prioritise dialogue and diplomacy," they said.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:45 a.m. No.23252159   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 35

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 8

>>23192240 Anthony Albanese still can’t get a sit-down meeting with Donald Trump - Donald Trump’s shock decision to leave the G7 summit early and cancel his meeting with Anthony Albanese has put the Prime Minister in a politically awkward position that has immediately drawn criticism over when he will sit down in person with the US President. Trump, who is dealing with a genuine threat that the Israel-Iran war could morph into a wider Middle East war and draw in US armed forces, has left Albanese in an embarrassing position after weeks of build-up that the pair would finally develop their relationship beyond three phone calls. Just minutes after Albanese finished a late afternoon press conference in Calgary, which is about one hour away from the G7 summit action in the Canadian mountainside town of Kananaskis, Mr Trump’s press secretary Karoline Leavitt delivered the news that Australian officials had been dreading - the meeting was off. Over recent days as the Middle East conflict escalated, Albanese and his ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, had been concerned the long-awaited meeting with Trump may not eventuate. Albanese was scheduled to speak with Trump for at least 20 minutes about 5.15pm local time on Tuesday afternoon (Wednesday AEST), shortly before the PM returned home from Canada. The 62-year-old was expected to be the second last leader to hold talks with Trump before the US President jetted home to deal with the war. In the past five days, Albanese has caught up with other key strategic allies and partners in Canada and Fiji. But overwhelmingly, the purpose of the trip was geared around the meeting with Trump. Albanese is not the only leader who misses out on a G7 meet with Trump. But the abrupt cancellation will spark criticism from detractors who will describe it as a “snub” and say it is proof that Australia does not rate highly on Trump’s radar.

 

>>23203256 Kunafa chef charged for chanting ‘All Zionists are terrorists’ at pro-Palestinian rallies - Victoria Police will argue in court that chanting “all Zionists are terrorists” in public is anti-Semitic and effectively brands the majority of Jewish Australians as such, in a major legal test of hate speech laws targeting pro-Palestinian activists. Summary of statement documents obtained by The Australian reveal Victoria Police deemed the controversial chant “anti-Semitic” and considered the use of it as an “affront” to the Jewish community while pressing charges against activists. The documents concern charging kunafa chef Jad Awwad Abu Alsendyan under Section 17(1) of the state’s Summary Offences Act - which prohibits profane, indecent or obscene language – for allegedly saying “all Zionists are terrorists” at pro-Palestinian rallies. If proven, the crime is punishable with two months’ prison for the first ­offence, three months for the second, and six months for three or more. Mr Alsendyan, who owns the popular Kunafeh House food truck, is facing two charges. The 48-year-old activist is widely regarded in Melbourne’s Middle Eastern community for making Nablus-style kunafa (Palestinian dessert). Police allege Mr Alsendyan led the chant during the Protest Until Ceasefire rally in Melbourne’s CBD on April 6, using a megaphone to amplify the slogan. Detectives say they relied on footage shared by pro-Palestinian groups online to identify him and other participants.

 

>>23203273 Iranian ambassador Ahmad Sadeghi calls on Anthony Albanese to condemn Israel, issues warning to Donald Trump - Iran's ambassador to Australia, Ahmad Sadeghi, has called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to condemn Israel's strikes on the Middle Eastern nation and denied that the Islamic Republic is working on a nuclear weapons program. Mr Sadeghi made the comments to 7.30 during a wide-ranging interview where he also refused to recognise Israel's right to exist as a state and warned US President Donald Trump there may be consequences for 80,000 US troops stationed in the Persian Gulf if the US strikes Iranian targets. Mr Sadeghi described Israel's June 13 attack on Iranian targets - that has seen a reported 224 people there killed — as "unprovoked". Since then, there have been a reported 24 casualties in Israel as a result of Iranian retaliatory strikes, with civilians dying on both sides. Mr Sadeghi defended the Iranian response as "its inalienable right to just defensive measures", before he called on Mr Albanese to condemn Israel for the June 13 attack that has pushed the Middle East to the brink of a wider conflict. "We ask Australia, as a friendly nation that we are in the good relation with, they have to condemn," Mr Sadeghi told 7.30. Asked if that meant a public condemnation of Israel from the Albanese government, the Iranian ambassador said: "Yes, I ask them."

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:45 a.m. No.23252160   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 36

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 9

>>23203311 Armoured cars, ferries: How Australians are fleeing the Middle East - Australians are resorting to chartering armoured cars and ferries to flee Israel, or sheltering in place in Iran, as Australia’s embassies scramble to organise evacuations in a region where flights are not operating and conflict is escalating. Almost 3000 Australians have registered to be evacuated out of Israel and Iran, representing a near doubling in the number of people seeking to flee for each day the conflict has continued, and some have accused the government’s response of being “delinquent”. At least two buses have already left Israel for Jordan with Australians on board, including one organised by insurers and the other by the government, but others are paying private companies for evacuation via armoured car or ferries to Cyprus. Wong told ABC News Breakfast on Thursday the missile strikes between Israel and Iran made the situation difficult because they made it impossible to conduct evacuation flights. “It’s a very, very difficult situation on the ground at the moment,” Wong said. “Obviously, there are more opportunities [to evacuate people] in relation to Israel. We took the opportunity to get a small group out across by land crossing yesterday. And we’ll seek to continue that … Iran is a very complicated situation, a very risky situation.” Airspace over the region has been closed since June 13, after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu launched dozens of missile attacks on Iranian targets with the aim of ending the expansion of its nuclear weapons development program. Iran has since retaliated.

 

>>23212682 Video: Australian embassy staff in Tehran rushed out of Iran amid fears of bigger conflict in the Middle East - The federal government has suspended its embassy in Iran and rushed out Australian diplomats in Tehran across the border into Azerbaijan as fears of a major war in the Middle East continue to mount. It is also ramping up its warnings to Australians in Iran, urging them to make their own way out of the country by road if they can safely do so. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the government had directed the departure of all Australian officials and dependents and suspended operations at its embassy in Tehran based on advice about "the deteriorating security environment in Iran". She warned the situation was volatile. "The government has a responsibility to ensure the safety of our staff … we do not have to cast our minds back too far in history to understand the risk to foreign officials in Iran in times of unrest," Senator Wong said. The ABC has been told that Australian diplomats - along with family members — spent almost 24 hours travelling by car to get out of the country as Israel and Iran continue to trade strikes, and as President Donald Trump contemplates US military action against Tehran. At least some of those Tehran-based diplomats are expected to stay in place near the Iran-Azerbaijan border as they work to evacuate more Australians from Iran. The minister said she was conscious that the embassy's closure would add to difficulties for Australians seeking to leave the country, but said staff continued to work on contingency plans for when Iran's airspace reopened.

 

>>23212691 Albanese government to evacuate Australians stranded in the Middle East amid Iran-Israel war - The Albanese government has shuttered the nation’s embassy in Iran and launched a major operation to evacuate Australian citizens from the Middle East, as US President Donald Trump granted Tehran a two-week window to abandon its nuclear program ­before he decides whether to launch US strikes on the country. Mr Trump said he believed there was a “substantial chance of negotiations” with Tehran, sparking a fresh European push for a diplomatic solution to the conflict in talks with Iran’s foreign minister in Switzerland. The evacuation mission, announced amid ongoing strikes between Israel and Iran on Friday AEST, includes the deployment of two RAAF passenger airlifters together with air force and army personnel and the relocation of consular staff to Azerbaijan to support Australians fleeing across the border from Iran. More than 2000 Australians and their family members are seeking help to leave Iran, while another 1200 have sought evacuation from Israel. Foreign Minister Penny Wong said the mission, dubbed Operation Beech, was currently unable to airlift Australians from either country but the government was preparing plans for the reopening of the region’s airspace. She said the decision to order the evacuation of Australian diplomats from Tehran was not taken lightly and the nation’s ­ambassador, Ian McConville, would remain in the region to support the government’s response to the unfolding crisis.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:46 a.m. No.23252162   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 37

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 10

>>23212698 Australia urges diplomacy as deadly Israel-Iran strikes ramp up and Trump weighs US options - Foreign Minister Penny Wong has joined demands for Iran to stop its nuclear weapons program and come to the negotiating table within the two-week deadline set by US President Donald Trump on Friday as he decides whether to join Israel’s strikes on the country. But as the Israel-Iran war entered its second week, more than 60 Israeli warplanes struck targets in Iran on Friday, including what Israel said were industrial sites used to produce missiles. Israel said it had also hit the headquarters of Iran’s Organisation of Defensive Innovation and Research, which the US had previously linked to the possible development of nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, Iran condemned Israel’s strike on its Arak heavy-water reactor on Thursday, describing it as a violation of international protocols designed to protect nuclear sites. “Any military attack on nuclear facilities is an assault on the entire IAEA safeguards regime and ultimately the NPT,” Iran’s Foreign Minister Sayyid Abbas Araghchi posted on X. In Israel, the emergency service said seven people suffered minor injuries when Iranian missiles hit a residential area in the south, causing damage to buildings. Separately, Israel accused Iran of deliberately targeting civilians with cluster munitions, which disperse small bombs over a wide area. And Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz warned Lebanon’s Hezbollah to exercise caution, saying Israel’s patience with “terrorists” who threaten it had worn thin. A day earlier, the head of Iran-backed Hezbollah, Naim Qassem, said the Lebanon-based group would act as it saw fit in the face of what he called “brutal Israeli-American aggression”.

 

>>23218742 Video: Trump warns against Iran retaliation after ‘spectacular success’ of US nuclear strikes - Donald Trump has threatened further attacks on Iran if the regime retaliates to the US precision strikes against three of the rogue nation’s nuclear enrichment facilities, warning that it will be met with a tragedy “far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days.” The US President said that America had “completely and totally obliterated” the Islamic theocracy’s nuclear enrichment facilities, arguing that he had worked as a team with Israel to inflict a major blow against the rogue nation. In an address to the nation at 10:00pm on Saturday night, Mr Trump demand that Iran sue for peace and accept a diplomatic solution to relinquish its dream of a nuclear bomb. He reminded the regime that “there are many targets left.” “If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill,” he said. “Most of them can be taken out in a matter of minutes.” Posting on his Truth Social platform a short time later, Mr Trump said that “any retaliation by Iran against the United States of America will be met with force far greater than what was witnessed tonight.” Three Iranian nuclear enrichment sites were targeted by America including Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. The US deployed its massive 30,000 pound “bunker buster” bombs for the first time in an active military operation to target the Fordow site which is buried deep under a mountain and 80 metres of solid rock.

 

>>23218784 Australian government calls for de-escalation of war in Iran as Coalition endorses US strikes - The Australian government has offered no endorsement of the United States's strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, instead issuing a statement reiterating calls for de-escalation as the opposition put forward its support for the military action. Donald Trump announced the United States had dropped "a full payload of bombs" on the Fordow nuclear site on Sunday, along with strikes on two other locations, declaring Iran's nuclear enrichment facilities "completely and totally obliterated". In response, a government spokesperson said: "We have been clear that Iran’s nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security. "We note the US president’s statement that now is the time for peace. The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue, and diplomacy." A short time after the government released its statement, the opposition came out in support of what it called the "proactive action" to bomb the nuclear facilities. "The Coalition supports the military action taken by the United States to stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons, specifically the strikes taken today against the facilities at Isfahan, Natanz and, critically, Fordow," acting Shadow Foreign Affairs Minister Andrew Hastie told reporters in Western Australia.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:46 a.m. No.23252164   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 38

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 11

>>23218831 Andrew Hastie slams Labor’s ‘ambiguous’ response to Iran strikes - Opposition acting foreign affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie has slammed the Albanese government’s “ambiguous” response to the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. Mr Hastie, speaking to reporters in Perth, said the Coalition backed US president Donald Trump’s move to strike the facilities, saying Iran was “moving towards acquiring a nuclear weapon”. “We could never accept a nuclear Iran. Iran is a repressive theocratic autocracy, and it’s a sponsor of terrorism,” he said. “President Trump gave the offer of negotiations, and over the last two days, the Iranians have not taken up that offer. The Coalition stands in solidarity with the Iranian people. We regret the loss of life in Iran and Israel, and we hope for a peaceful settlement going forward.” Asked what he made of the Albanese government’s response to the strikes, Mr Hastie said it was “far too ambiguous”. “The United States is a close ally. The United States has a key role in re-establishing order and peace in the Middle East,” he said. “And Iran, by contrast, is a regime that sponsors terrorism. It sponsored Hamas, Hezbollah.” Earlier on Sunday, an unnamed government spokesperson called for “de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy” but did not explicitly support or condemn the actions of Mr Trump.

 

>>23218858 ‘Last resort’: Scott Morrison backs US attack on Iranian nuclear sites - Former Prime Minister Scott Morrison has backed US President Donald Trump’s decision to bomb Iran’s nuclear facilities as “a last resort”, urging Australia to now speak with clarity about why the US had to act. Describing the bombing as “a necessary event”, Mr Morrison stressed that the United States had launched a targeted mission and was not proposing regime change. Speaking on Sky News, he said it reflected the fact the US was the only ally of Israel with the military hardware to penetrate Iran’s underground nuclear bunkers. “There were no other options available to the President,’’ Mr Morrison said. “I think President Trump has been very clear about seeking to get an agreement with Iran. This was completely rejected, and made it very clear that there was no negotiation now there was the opportunity for complete capitulation and that was not offered, and they are the only military in the world that is capable of doing what it has just done.” But in a barbed observation on the conduct of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Foreign Minister Penny Wong he urged Australia to now speak with “clarity.” “Well, it’s time for some clarity. I think there’s been far too much ambiguity about this from Australia,’’ he said. “And the clarity is we were dealing with a theocratic authoritarian state that sponsored an attack on a close friend in Israel back on October 7. They have shown their true colours. And Iran is not a friend of Australia. It’s not a friend of Australia’s interests. This is not a conflict not with the people of Iran who are wonderful people.”

 

>>23224342 Video: Anthony Albanese declares Australia backs US strikes to stop Iran’s nuclear program - a day later - Anthony Albanese has reiterated that his government backs the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites but that it does not want to see an “escalation and a full-scale war” following the attack. “The world has long agreed that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon and we support action to prevent that - that is what this is,” the Prime Minister said at a press conference in Canberra on Monday morning. “The US action was directed at specific sites central to Iran’s nuclear program. We don’t want escalation and a full-scale war. We continue to call for dialogue and for diplomacy. “As I have said for many days now, we are deeply concerned about any escalation in the region and we want to see diplomacy, dialogue and de-escalation.” Mr Albanese declined to say whether or not Australia was given warning - like the UK was – before the US struck Iranian nuclear sites. “This was a unilateral action taken by the United States,” the Prime Minister said. He was asked repeatedly whether this meant his government did not know this would happen but Mr Albanese declined to provide a direct answer. Earlier Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong said the Albanese government backed the US decision to strike nuclear facilities in Iran, the enunciation of support coming almost 24 hours after the US operation. The government, in the hours after the attack, urged “de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy”, and did not explicitly back the US strikes.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:46 a.m. No.23252165   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 39

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 12

>>23224354 COMMENTARY: Canberra out of its depth as US, Israel remake Middle East - "Donald Trump just redrew the strategic map of the Middle East - and Australia’s response is to urge “dialogue”. Trump claimed the US strike on three Iranian nuclear facilities was a “spectacular military success” and that the sites had been “completely and totally obliterated”. In a statement after the attack, Trump emphasised that if Iran did not make peace, there are many other targets the US can hit “in a matter of minutes”. Australia’s response remains a shambles. Appearing on Sky News on Sunday morning, Defence Minister Richard Marles called three times for “de-escalation”, even as Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities were being dismantled in real time. He acknowledged “the risk that the Iranian nuclear and ballistic missile program represents to both the region and the stability of the world” but still emphasised that “we’ve been urging dialogue and diplomacy”. Calling for dialogue at this point is detached from reality and weakens Australia’s credibility among key allies. Marles will also go to NATO this week denying that Australia should urgently lift its defence spending. That will put him on the outer with the US, with many European countries and with Japan, New Zealand and South Korea - the other members of the so-called IP4 – meeting at The Hague summit. What is it that all these countries see that Australia can’t about our strategic outlook? Marles is completely out of his depth in a government that has marginalised our international standing. He continues to weaken our military at a time the rest of the democratic world is waking up to the threat." - Peter Jennings, former deputy secretary for strategy in the Defence Department (2009-12) - theaustralian.com.au

 

>>23224365 Anthony Albanese, Penny Wong too slow to back Iran strikes - "The Albanese government has yet again been dragged kicking and screaming to support its closest ally as it does the heavy lifting to strengthen global security. It took a staggering 24 hours for the government to back the US’s surgical strikes on Iran to prevent the rogue state getting nuclear weapons. On Sunday, as Australians digested the momentous news, Labor’s issued an equivocal statement calling for “de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy”, delivered via an unnamed spokesman. Not a word from Anthony Albanese or Penny Wong. Fast forward to Monday morning and it had finally got its act together, rolling out the Foreign Minister to voice Australia’s support for the action. A terse nine-minute press conference followed, in which the Prime Minister suggested the government had backed the strikes all along. “The world has long agreed that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon, and we support action to prevent that. That is what this is,” he said. This was inevitably where the government was going to land. Why couldn’t it have said so earlier? “We issued a statement yesterday,” Albanese retorted, when asked about the delay. All of this will have given the Trump administration further cause to see Australia under Labor is a less dependable ally than it once was. Yet the government still expects the full benefits of US protection and its “crown jewels” - nuclear submarine technology." - Ben Packham - theaustralian.com.au

 

>>23224370 Albanese doesn’t want a bar of Middle East conflict, but that comes at a cost - "Anthony Albanese’s government appears more distant than ever from the Trump administration following the United States’ decision to join Israel in bombing Iranian nuclear facilities. On the face of it, nothing much has changed. Albanese, joined by Penny Wong, announced Australia’s support for US strikes on Monday morning because “the world has long agreed that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear weapon and we support action to prevent that”. Make no mistake, there are small but subtle shifts under way in the US-Australia relationship now that Donald Trump is back in the White House. The fact he has not met Albanese face to face surely has not helped. It was strange, then, that Albanese appeared almost annoyed in his press conference that he had been left out of the loop on the US decision to strike even as he confirmed that “we aren’t a central player in this conflict - that’s just a fact.” When the prime minister was asked for a third time why the federal government had waited 24 hours before expressing unequivocal support for the US bombing, he bit back. “We issued a statement,” he deadpanned. The Sunday statement came from a government spokesperson, not from the prime minister or the foreign minister, nor from either of their offices, which in itself was a deliberate decision to downplay its significance." - James Massola - smh.com.au

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:47 a.m. No.23252167   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 40

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 13

>>23224374 Iranian ambassador says US military bases could be targeted after strikes - Iran's ambassador to Australia has warned Donald Trump's "act of animosity" in ordering the bombing of Iranian nuclear sites could see US military bases targeted and a key sealane closed. In an exclusive interview with 9News, Ahmad Sadeghi said the US president had proved himself to be the "puppet" of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, for which there would be "consequences". "Islamic countries all around the world would consider this (an) act of animosity and they won't be silent inside the region," Sadeghi said. "The US does have personnel and bases, either in southern part of the Persian Gulf or other regions in the West Asia, that they have bases. The other (consequence) is, you know, the ramification on the Persian Gulf from the navigation and just transfer of energy in the region." A fifth of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz and its closure would see fuel prices skyrocket. Sadeghi said Australia, as a peace-loving country, should "support justice and legality" and not side with the US. "We are friendly with Australia. We do not have any sort of animosity with them," he said.

 

>>23224390 Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize - Pakistan said on Saturday it would recommend U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that he has said he craves, for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between India and Pakistan. Some analysts in Pakistan said the move might persuade Trump to think again about potentially joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has condemned Israel's action as a violation of international law and a threat to regional stability. In May, a surprise announcement by Trump of a ceasefire brought an abrupt end to a four-day conflict between nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan. Trump has since repeatedly said that he averted a nuclear war, saved millions of lives, and grumbled that he got no credit for it. Pakistan agrees that U.S. diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries. "President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation," Pakistan said. "This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker." Governments can nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize. There was no immediate response from Washington. A spokesperson for the Indian government did not respond to a request for comment.

 

>>23224392 Pakistan condemns Trump's bombing of Iran - a day after nominating him for Peace Prize - Pakistan condemned on Sunday the strikes ordered on its neighbour Iran by Donald Trump, a day after Islamabad had said it would nominate the U.S. President for the Nobel Peace Prize. Pakistan on Sunday said Trump's decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities violated international law and that diplomacy was the only way to resolve the Iran crisis. “The unprecedented escalation of tension and violence, owing to ongoing aggression against Iran is deeply disturbing. Any further escalation of tensions will have severely damaging implications for the region and beyond,” Pakistan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said. Also on Sunday, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif telephoned Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and “conveyed Pakistan’s condemnation of the U.S. attacks," a statement from the Pakistani leader said. Pakistan’s information minister and the foreign ministry did not respond to requests for comment on the apparent contradiction in the country’s positions over the weekend. In Pakistan’s biggest city, Karachi, thousands marched in protest against the U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran. A large American flag with a picture of Trump on it was placed on the road for demonstrators to walk over. The protesters shouted out chants against America, Israel and Pakistan’s regional enemy India. Pakistan on Saturday said it was nominating Trump as "a genuine peacemaker" for his role in bringing a four-day conflict with India to an end last month. It said he had “demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship”.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:47 a.m. No.23252169   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 41

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 14

>>23230111 Anthony Albanese rejects he was ‘flat-footed’ responding to US strikes on Iran; defends NATO no-show - Anthony Albanese has dismissed criticism that he was “flat-footed” in his response to the US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, with the public only hearing from the Prime Minister 24 hours after the attack had happened. Mr Albanese said criticism came from “the usual suspects” and that “there are some in the media who have a criticism of anything that the Labor government does”. “What my government does is act in an orderly, coherent way,” he told Sky News on Tuesday. “And we were very clear for some period of time that Iran could not be allowed to have a nuclear weapon. We called for Iran to come to the table to ensure that the United States wouldn’t have to take the action which they did. The action that they took, we made clear that we supported action that would ensure that Iran couldn’t gain that nuclear weapon.” Mr Albanese reiterated that he wanted “to see … the ceasefire announced by President Trump implemented”. The Prime Minister also stood by his decision not to attend the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation summit in The Netherlands, despite reports Donald Trump was seeking a meeting with Australia, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand at the summit. The Prime Minister said “three of the four” IP4 (Indo-Pacific 4) leaders would not be at the summit and that it was “appropriate” that Defence Minister Richard Marles attended instead. Mr Albanese said Australia and the US had agreed Mr Albanese and Mr Trump would “have a meeting and that will take place at a time that’s convenient for both of us”.

 

>>23230126 COMMENTARY: PM’s confusion, passivity and weakness has made us irrelevant - "It is difficult to think of a time when Australia has been so inconsequential, so powerless, so much without influence, so incapable of affecting its own destiny or anyone else’s, as we have become under the Albanese government. The truly astonishing performance on the question of the US strikes on Iran’s nuclear facilities is a classic case. It seems at one level eccentric, even for an Australian, to focus on the performance of the government in Canberra when the world is gripped by crisis in the Middle East and has so many other crises to be going on with. Consider the absolute weird lameness of the government’s response to the US’s actions. They happened on Sunday morning our time and every sentient being on the planet knew about them and had a view. Not the Albanese government. It put out one of its characteristic non-statements. Albanese has no relationship to speak of with Trump. Australia in modern times has seldom been less influential on, or less inside the thinking of, Washington. Britain was informed of the US actions in advance. Naturally, Australia was not. We live on the capital of the goodwill of our past and the continued relevance of our geography. But Australia would be just as relevant strategically if it were a colony of penguins. Then on Monday, through gritted teeth, came government statements saying Australia supported the US actions in Iran because it was important to prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons. The Albanese government got to the right position but, characteristically, only after exhausting all other alternatives. The statement and the unbearably stilted, constipated, almost pre-AI robotic performance at the press conference were frankly a national embarrassment." - Greg Sheridan - theaustralian.com.au

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:48 a.m. No.23252170   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 42

Middle East Conflict - The Australian Perspective - Part 15

>>23234829 Trump scolds Israel and Iran as he accuses both of violating ceasefire:They don’t know what the f*ck they’re doing!- US President Donald Trump has unleashed a tirade on Israel for violating his ceasefire, saying both it and Iran “don’t know what the fck they’re doing” in an unprecedented display of rage at a close American ally. Trump had declared a ceasefire between the two enemy states at 6pm on Monday, US time, saying it would start at midnight and end a conflict that has raged since Israel launched missiles at Iran in the early hours of June 13. But in short order, both sides were accusing each other of violating the deal. A statement from the office of Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, reported by The Times of Israel, said Israel “attacked forcefully in the heart of Tehran” hours before the ceasefire started, killing “hundreds of Basij and Iranian security forces”. Leaving the White House for the NATO summit in the Netherlands early Tuesday morning, US time, Trump said he had watched coverage of the ceasefire on television all night and was deeply disappointed in the violations, particularly from Israel. “I think they both violated it. I’m not sure they did it intentionally, they couldn’t rein people back,” he said before boarding a military helicopter. “I don’t like the fact that Israel went out this morning at all. As soon as I can get away from you, I’m going to see if I can stop it,” Trump told reporters. “Israel, as soon as we made the deal, they came out and they dropped a load of bombs the likes of which I’ve never seen before. The biggest load that we’ve seen. I’m not happy with Israel. When I say, ‘OK now you have 12 hours’, you don’t go out in the first hour and just drop everything you have on them. So I’m not happy with them. I’m not happy with Iran either.” Unprompted, Trump added: “We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don’t know what the fck they’re doing. Do you understand that?”

 

>>23248389 US president says he could bomb Iran again, as 3,200 Australians and family members register with DFAT - US President Donald Trump has warned Iran he would order another bombing raid on its nuclear sites if Tehran resumed efforts to develop a nuclear weapon. Speaking to reporters at the White House on Friday (US time), Mr Trump said he would "without question, absolutely" consider further military action if necessary. His comments came as the number of Australians and family members in Iran registered with the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) crisis portal grew to 3,200. Soon after Israel began bombing Iran in mid-June, DFAT evacuated its staff from Tehran to Azerbaijan. On the advice of DFAT, some Australians in Iran travelled to the Iran-Azerbaijan border hoping leave Iran last week but got knocked back by Azerbaijan officials in part because they didn't have a special code, the ABC reported on Thursday. Late on Friday, a DFAT spokesperson said the backlog of Australian requests for border crossing codes had been resolved. They said DFAT was supporting Australians who wished to leave Iran secure seats on commercial flights that had begun operating out of the country. A US government security alert said Iranian airspace had partially reopened, "although commercial travel from Tehran and other major hubs may be disrupted".

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:50 a.m. No.23252175   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 43

Australian Politics and Society - Part 1

>>22964101 Roberts-Smith’s appeal dealt blow after ‘fishing expedition’ cut down - Disgraced soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has suffered a blow to his plans to appeal against a defamation judgment which found he committed war crimes while on duty in Afghanistan. The former Special Air Service corporal sued the publisher of this newspaper, then known as Fairfax Media, and The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald investigative journalist Nick McKenzie, after a series of articles alleged Roberts-Smith carried out war crime murders while deployed with the SAS. The Federal Court dismissed the case in June 2023 when a judge found, to the civil standard of the balance of probabilities, that Roberts-Smith had committed multiple war crime murders, assaulted Afghans and engaged in a campaign of bullying against Australian troops a decade earlier. The Victoria Cross recipient appealed against the judgment and has been waiting for a decision for more than a year. Last month, he filed an application to reopen his appeal to introduce as evidence a recording of McKenzie speaking to a woman the famed soldier had an affair with, known in the trial as Person 17. In the call, McKenzie allegedly says Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife, Emma Roberts, and her close friend, Danielle Scott, were “actively briefing us on his legal strategy in respect of you”. Roberts-Smith’s legal team on Wednesday defended wide-ranging subpoenas they had issued to McKenzie, the journalist’s lawyers, Person 17, Roberts, Scott, and the ABC. “To say that (the recording) contents are shocking is an understatement,” Roberts-Smith’s lawyer Arthur Moses, SC, told the court. Moses called the subpoenas an attempt to follow “the ripples of a breach”. Nine’s lawyers opposed the subpoenas, characterising them as a “fishing expedition” which were too broad in scope and time-frame. On Thursday, Justice Nye Perram appeared to agree by striking out the vast bulk of Roberts-Smith’s requests for information. Eight of 10 categories of information sought from McKenzie were deleted.

 

>>22964102 ‘Sneering and supercilious’: Reporter Nick McKenzie takes stand against Ben Roberts-Smith’s silk - When Nick McKenzie walks into the witness box of the Federal Court on Thursday to testify in what may be the most consequential moment of his career, all eyes will turn to the rear of the court to see if his nemesis, Ben Roberts-Smith, has arrived at his favourite window seat. The Victoria Cross recipient, who attended almost every day of his defamation trial against the Nine newspapers, has not appeared at any of the hearings in his appeal against judge Anthony Besanko’s finding that he was a war criminal. But the prospect of seeing the tables turned against McKenzie, the investigative reporter whose sleuthing led to his downfall, may prove too tempting. The 11th-hour bid to reopen the appeal is the endgame in a titanic struggle between Australia’s most decorated soldier and its most decorated journalist: the recipient of the Victoria Cross for conspicuous gallantry locked in combat with the winner of 16 Walkley Awards, the country’s highest journalism honour. And now on the table: the possible upending of the country’s ­biggest and most expensive defamation case. McKenzie never took the stand in the defamation trial, but now, after a secret recording suggested he obtained what Roberts-Smith says is privileged information about his legal strategy, the reporter has chosen to confront the allegation head-on. It’s a bold but risky move by the highly respected McKenzie. Friends say he is anxious to present his side of the story and confident he will be shown to have acted ethically, despite his secretly recorded comments. He will argue that none of the information he received from Roberts-Smith’s ex-wife Emma Roberts and her best friend Danielle Scott was legally privileged. But giving evidence means also exposing himself to cross-examination by the former soldier’s lawyer. And not just any lawyer: Arthur Moses, the fearsome Sydney silk who was on the losing side of the defamation case.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:50 a.m. No.23252176   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 44

Australian Politics and Society - Part 2

>>22964138 Talisman Sabre 2025Video: Talisman Sabre 2025 is coming from 13 July - 04 August 2025- Australia will host the largest ever Exercise Talisman Sabre from 13 July to 4 August 2025 with over 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations set to participate in activities across Australia, and for the first time, in Papua New Guinea. Now in its 11th iteration, Talisman Sabre is the largest bilateral combined training activity between the Australian Defence Force and the United States military, reflecting the closeness of our Alliance. Participating partner nations in Talisman Sabre 2025 also include Canada, Fiji, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, the Philippines, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Thailand, Tonga, and the United Kingdom. Brunei, Malaysia and Vietnam will also attend as observers. Talisman Sabre 2025 will focus on multi-domain warfighting. Key activities will include amphibious and airborne lodgements, firepower demonstrations, and combat across land, air, sea, space and cyber domains. The logistics for preparing, staging, integrating and moving forces to and around Australia are the most complex ever undertaken for a Talisman Sabre. The activities are scheduled to take place right across the nation, including Queensland, Western Australia, the Northern Territory, New South Wales and on Christmas Island. For the first time ever, Papua New Guinea will also host an activity, highlighting the growing capabilities and interoperability with Pacific partners as Papua New Guinea marks its 50th Anniversary of Independence.

 

>>22964138 Talisman Sabre -Magic Sword- https://''www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw'' - https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic

 

>>22968833 Anthony Albanese ducks as Russian envoy goes on the offensive - Vladimir Putin’s top envoy to Indonesia said on Monday that Russia views Australia as a “non-friendly state” that sanctions its President and supplies money and armaments to Ukraine, as Anthony Albanese dodged questions over whether he knew about Moscow’s request to base long-range military aircraft in Papua before the election campaign kicked off. The comments came as the Prime Minister faced fresh questions over the issue, first reported by the respected Janes defence journal on April 14, after having previously sown doubt over whether Russia actually made the request. Asked on Monday whether he knew what Russia was asking for before the election campaign - as revealed in The Australian – he appeared to change tack, saying he would not be goaded into using intelligence for political gain. “What adults do on intelligence is receive them and not do it – conduct it through the media,” Mr Albanese said. “When it comes to intelligence, adults act like adults.” The Prime Minister also told Sydney radio 2GB his government had been “completely clear that the Indonesia government have said that this is not going to happen and, what’s more, my opponent verballed the President of Indonesia, an important country that we have an important diplomatic ­relationship with”. “Russia, of course, will engage in the sort of propaganda that tries to assert its influence,” he said. “The truth is that Russia is struggling to beat the brave people of Ukraine under President Zelenskyy - something my government has backed Ukraine everyday.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:52 a.m. No.23252179   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 45

Australian Politics and Society - Part 3

>>22973571 Cyclist injured in Blairgowrie crash with Daniel Andrews pockets secret out-of-court settlement - A cyclist struck by Daniel and Catherine Andrews’ SUV has pocketed a secret out-of-court settlement worth several hundreds of thousands of dollars. The Herald Sun can reveal major law firm Slater & Gordon has agreed to hand over the massive payout to Ryan Meuleman just weeks before an explosive Supreme Court trial was due to begin. Ryan’s lawyer, Marcus Clarke KC, confirmed a confidential settlement had been reached over the family’s claim that the Labor-aligned law firm failed to act in his best interests in the aftermath of the crash. “In the end he received an offer too good to refuse,” Mr Clarke said. “I am pleased for Ryan. He now has closure in relation to his claim against Slater & Gordon.” But the “bike boy” dispute is far from over, with the Meuleman family moving to pursue the former Victorian premier and his wife directly through the courts over the near-fatal 2013 crash. “I’ve been telling the truth since I was 15 years old,” Ryan said. “The people in the car are next. They shouldn’t get away with lying either.” Ryan’s father, Peter Meuleman, said: “My son has been called a liar since he was a teenager. Can you imagine what that does to a boy? The truth will now come out in the lawsuits against Andrews and his wife for defamation. Ryan isn’t stopping. Damning evidence has been covered up and ignored for a decade. It was always there to find.” Mr and Mrs Andrews were served with concerns notices in January - separate to the Slater & Gordon case - over statements they made following the release of a damning review of the crash conducted by the state’s former Assistant Commissioner for Traffic and Operations Dr Raymond Shuey.

 

>>22973582 Video: Slater and Gordon reach settlement with Ryan Meuleman over 2013 crash with Dan Andrews’ vehicle - A cyclist left injured after a collision with former Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews’ car more than a decade ago has agreed to settle a lawsuit against his former law firm. Ryan Meuleman launched legal action against Slater and Gordon alleging it failed to act in his best interest when negotiating an $80,000 compensation settlement with the Transport Accident Commission. Mr Meuleman, who was 15 at the time, was seriously injured in January 2013 after colliding with the then-Labor opposition leader’s Ford Territory, which was being driven by his wife Catherine at Blairgowrie. Mr Andrews and the couple’s three children were in the car at the time. The family have consistently denied any wrongdoing, and no charges were laid following an investigation by Victoria Police. Mr Meuleman spent 11 days in hospital after the crash. He has alleged the car struck him, while the Andrews’ have repeatedly insisted the cyclist crashed into their car. On Wednesday, Mr Meuleman’s lawyer, Marcus Clarke KC, confirmed the lawsuit had been settled after Ryan received a confidential offer “too good to refuse”. Details of the settlement are confidential, however, in a statement, Mr Meuleman said it felt incredible to be “supported and believed”.

 

>>22977695 ‘Secret recording’ win as Ben Roberts-Smith appeals war crimes ruling - Nine reporter Nick McKenzie has acknowledged writing in his book that he had “his balls in a vice” because his career would be over if he lost the defamation case brought against him by Ben ­Roberts-Smith, but insisted he was only ever motivated “to find evidence of truth”. McKenzie took the stand late on Thursday in Robert-Smith’s appeal against the finding that he was a war criminal, after the Federal Court ruled earlier in the day that the secret recording at the heart of the case should be ­allowed into evidence. The recording was a snippet of a phone conversation between McKenzie and Roberts-Smith’s former mistress, known in the case as Person 17, in which the journalist appears to admit having access to the war veteran’s privileged legal strategy. Roberts-Smith argues that this access gave Nine newspapers an unfair advantage in the defamation trial and constituted a miscarriage of justice. In cross-examination, barrister Arthur Moses, appearing for Roberts-Smith, probed McKenzie about whether it was ethical for a journalist to unlawfully gain unauthorised access to someone else’s personal data, and whether he had ever done so. “In your work as an investigative journalist, have you ever unlawfully gained unauthorised access to someone else’s personal data by using subterfuge?” Moses asked. “I believe - well, yes,” McKenzie replied. However, he strenuously denied acting unethically.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:53 a.m. No.23252182   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 46

Australian Politics and Society - Part 4

>>22982064 Video: Trump called this Australian billionaire a ‘red-haired weirdo’. Now, they’ve met again - Eighteen months ago, when a troubling story emerged alleging Donald Trump had disclosed sensitive information about US nuclear submarines to packaging magnate Anthony Pratt at Mar-a-Lago, Trump denied it and called the Australian billionaire a “red-haired weirdo”. Now, Pratt is a US green card holder and - having just announced his company will invest billions of dollars in American manufacturing – scored an invitation to a White House ceremony, where the president described him as a friend. Seated in the White House’s grand foyer on Wednesday, Washington time, about 80 dignitaries listened as Trump read through a list of business leaders who were contributing to US industry, like an emcee thanking donors at a charity ball. “Executive global chairman of Pratt Industries, friend of mine, Anthony Pratt - he’s investing $US5 billion ($7.82 billion), thank you,” Trump said as Pratt stood in his blue suit, flashed his hand up in thanks, and sat down again. Trump went on: “I read a report that he’s the richest man in Australia, but who the hell knows. Do you think you’re the richest man in Australia?” Pratt stood up again, hesitated and gestured to indicate he wasn’t sure. “Close,” Trump assisted. “I don’t like to put you on the spot like that, Anthony, but that’s pretty good.” According to the 2025 Forbes rich list, Pratt was the eighth-wealthiest person in Australia, though he is now US-based.

 

>>23012385 Video: American Robert Francis Prevost elected Pope Leo XIV - The new leader of the Catholic Church is the American cardinal Robert Prevost, who has taken the papal name Leo XIV. Pope Leo XIV, the first American pope, emerged on the balcony overlooking St Peter’s Square early this morning Australian time to huge cheers and prolonging applause from the tens of thousands of people who stampeded into the area once the bells tolled and white smoke billowed from the Sistine Chapel on day two of voting. Amid wild excitement and cheers of “Abbiamo Papa, ole, ole, ole” Leo XIV emerged about an hour later quietly raising his hands and waving with both arms. He appeared to choke up when the crowd responded with chants of ‘Viva il Papa’. The new pope is a 69-year-old dual citizen, originally from Chicago, who took Peruvian citizenship after serving in that country for several decades. Most recently he has been the head of the church’s Dicastery for Bishops overseeing the selection of new bishops. Pope Leo XIV is not without controversy however. He was previously criticised for not doing enough within the church to deal with historic sexual assault allegations, although he had referred the complaints to the police. Leo XIV is considered a compromise candidate, and a centrist embracing a pastoral role not unlike Francis. However he opposes ordaining women as deacons and on other issues of church doctrine is somewhat conservative. Tim Costelloe, the Archbishop of Perth, was among the first to congratulate the new pope. “Cardinal Prevost brought to his most recent role as Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops an approachability and willingness to listen which were no doubt developed throughout his many years as an Augustinian missionary in Peru. He will be warmly welcomed by the Church in Latin America, as Pope Francis was, by the Church in the United States from where he comes, from the English-speaking world as a native English speaker, and from the whole Church as a man of God steeped in the rich spirituality of his Augustinian Religious Order. As Pope Leo XIV, our new pope will bring the benefit of his wide experience to the many challenges and opportunities before him.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:53 a.m. No.23252183   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 47

Australian Politics and Society - Part 5

>>23012408 Video: PM congratulates incoming Pope Leo XIV, invites him to Australia - Anthony Albanese has congratulated Pope Leo XIV and invited the new pontiff to Australia in three years’ time. Robert Prevost, 69, was announced as the 267th leader of the Catholic Church on Thursday (local time) after the Conclave deliberated for two days - one of the shortest papal elections in history. The first American pope, he was introduced as Leo XIV to the tens of thousands gathered in St Peter’s Square. The Prime Minister said on Friday the new pope’s “leadership comes at an important time for the Catholic Church and for the world”. “I will invite His Holiness Pope Leo to Australia for the International Eucharistic Congress which is being proudly hosted in 2028,” Mr Albanese told reporters at Parliament House. “And I’ve had discussions with Archbishop Anthony Fisher of Sydney, who of course I know very well, about the importance of Australia hosting that very significant event in just a few years’ time. “And I know that the Church here in Australia is very excited to have this privilege and honour.”

 

>>23012560 Google AI chatbot, Gemini, to be available to Aussie kids under 13 within months - Google will launch its Gemini AI chatbot for Australian children under 13 within months, the ABC can reveal. The tech giant is rolling out the program in the US this week, with a worldwide launch to follow in the coming months, although no date has yet been specified. The ABC understands the chatbot will be automatically available to children via Google's Family Link app after the launch, although parents will have the option to switch it off. "It's unusual to me that this would be turned on by default," said Professor Lisa Given, an expert in the social impact of technology at RMIT University. "It relies on parents … or the child themselves, having the skill to navigate the controls and turn things off." Multiple experts expressed alarm at the plan, saying AI chatbots pose more acute risks for children. They warned Google's Gemini chatbot has the potential to confuse, misinform and manipulate children. "Systems that are enabled by AI can certainly hallucinate or make up information," Professor Given said. Every expert the ABC spoke to had concerns younger people may have difficulty understanding that the chatbots are not human. "These systems really attempt to replicate or mirror how people engage with each other," said Professor Given, adding that even adults weren't immune to the illusion. "I've done some research looking at Replika, where adults were actually very much taken in … and really came to believe that they had a relationship with the system itself, very much like a friend or even a romantic partner," she said.

 

>>23012568 ‘I build relationships’: Albanese ready for crucial tariff negotiations with Trump - Anthony Albanese says his people skills will stand him in good stead when he sits down with Donald Trump in the Oval Office in coming weeks, in what looms as a pivotal meeting to plead Australia’s case for a tariff carve-out. “I build relationships with people,” the Prime Minister told Sky News when asked how he would navigate the encounter. “I have many friends in the business community, in the union movement, in civil society, groups that I’ve engaged with for a long period of time. “I’m pretty upfront in how I engage with people and I’ve developed that as well on an international level.” Mr Albanese will go into the meeting with a renewed mandate and fresh confidence following his election win and President Trump’s conciliatory sit-down with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney this week. A soon-to-be announced trade deal between the US and Britain, teased by Mr Trump on his Truth Social network on Wednesday, will also set a positive tone for the talks. The agreement will be the first of Mr Trump’s second term and comes as his administration progresses trade talks with India and Japan, and prepares for critical negotiations with China. Don Farrell, who hopes to be reappointed Trade Minister when Mr Albanese unveils his frontbench in coming days, is also preparing a diplomatic push to shore up Australia’s trade ties. If he retains his job, as is widely expected, he is likely to attend the APEC trade ministers meeting in South Korea next Thursday for talks with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and rattled Asian counterparts whose economies could be ruined by Mr Trump’s tariff blitz.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:53 a.m. No.23252185   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 48

Australian Politics and Society - Part 6

>>23024200 Video: Australian Nick Parsons killed in Ukraine while clearing mines - A former Australian Defence Force member killed in eastern Ukraine while clearing mines for an explosives disposal charity has been described as “a hero for Ukrainians” who was engaged in dangerous work close to the frontlines. Nick Parsons, who was working for a US-registered organisation named Prevail Together, was killed last week in Izyum. A Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade spokeswoman confirmed DFAT was “providing consular assistance to the family of an Australian man who died in Ukraine”. Mr Parsons, believed to be from Queensland, had been working to clear mines and other unexploded ordnance in Ukraine following a long stint in the Australian Defence Force, which one source said he had recently left. Izyum is a city in the Kharkiv Oblast region approximately 40km from the frontline. Ukrainian ambassador Vasyl Myroshnychenko told The Australian on Monday Mr Parsons was “a hero for Ukrainians who was on a very important mission”. “There are individuals like Nick Parsons who couldn’t sit on the couch, and decided to go and travel,” Mr Myroshnychenko said. “I understand he was trained to be an engineer … I understand there was also another British guy who he was with, and both of them got killed, as mates being there, they got rid of unexploded ordnance as well as mines.”

 

>>23027894 High Court to decide if information gathered on encrypted messaging app AN0M was legally obtained - The High Court will on Tuesday delve into the murky world of organised crime and encrypted messaging on an app known as AN0M, which was secretly controlled by the FBI and the Australian Federal Police (AFP). The operation known as "Ironside" began in 2018, when phones with the app began to circulate among criminal elements, encouraged by people the police identified as "criminal influencers", who unwittingly recommended the devices. It appeared to be a secure way to send messages, except that every communication was being copied and forwarded to police. In 2021 there was a worldwide crackdown. The app had collected about 28 million messages, including 19 million relating to Australia. The Australian Criminal Intelligence Commission (ACIC) said there were nearly 1,000 arrests globally, with 42 tonnes of illicit drugs and $US58 million in cash and crypto currency seized. According to AFP data, there have been nearly 100 people in Australia charged, with drugs, firearms, and substantial amounts of money seized. The ACIC said at the time the operation "provided voluminous, invaluable intelligence and insight that has never been obtained before by Australian law enforcement". But now two South Australian men, who are alleged members of the Comancheros bikie group, want the High Court to find that information was not legally obtained. The two are charged with belonging to a criminal group and possession of prohibited firearms. Their lawyers will tell the High Court the evidence against them collected from AN0M should be inadmissible in their trial, because its collection breached The Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979. "The question is whether communications obtained covertly by the AN0M application were obtained as the result of an unlawful interception," their submissions to the court said.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:54 a.m. No.23252186   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 49

Australian Politics and Society - Part 7

>>23032082 Video: Australian labourer Caleb List feared dead in Ukraine - A Queensland labourer who travelled to Ukraine three years ago to join the fight against Russia's invasion is feared to have been recently killed in battle, but authorities are yet to locate his remains. Sources in Ukraine have told the ABC that former Gladstone resident Caleb List, who signed up with Ukraine's armed forces in 2022, is believed to have died last month during heavy fighting in the Kharkiv region. In an interview in 2023 with German international public broadcaster Deutsche Welle (DW), the young Australian outlined his motivation for volunteering with Ukraine's Foreign Legion shortly after President Vladimir Putin launched the invasion. "I wanted to test myself; I wanted to join the French Foreign Legion, I wanted to push myself to the extreme - so I came here with the same motivation, and I've basically done that and now I just do this because it's the only thing I'm really good at," he told DW. A figure connected to Ukraine's Armed Forces has told the ABC Mr List is believed to have been killed by artillery fire in heavily contested territory near the city of Izyum late last month, but his remains have not yet been recovered by his unit. The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) has declined to comment on the case, but in a statement, it reminded Australians that travel to Ukraine was considered extremely dangerous. "The Australian government has consistently advised Australians not to travel to Ukraine or Russia since Russia's full-scale invasion began in February 2022," a DFAT spokesperson told the ABC. Before travelling to Europe, Mr List worked as a trade assistant at Queensland's Yarwun refinery. While at school he joined the army cadets but his subsequent application to become an Australian soldier was rejected.

 

>>23035935 Australia PM Albanese meets Indonesia counterpart in first international visit since re-election - Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese held talks with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto on defence cooperation and global trade on Thursday, describing Jakarta as an "indispenable partner" on his first international visit since his re-election. Albanese, sworn into office on Tuesday after his centre-left Labor party won an increased majority in parliament, said his visit showed the priority Canberra placed on defence and economic ties with Jakarta. "Indonesia is an indispensable partner for Australia," he said in opening remarks, meeting with Prabowo and ministers at the Presidential Palace. He urged Prabowo to forge closer defence ties with Australia, after an agreement was struck last year covering maritime security, counter-terrorism and disaster response. "Security is built on the sovereignty of every nation and the rules that govern all nations," he said when the two leaders addressed the media after their meeting. Indonesia committed to completing the ratification of the defence agreement, Prabowo said. "We will continue discussing the opportunities to improve and increase cooperation in defence sector," he said. Trade and investment, food security, energy transition and critical minerals were also discussed, Prabowo said. "We also invite Australia to participate more in our economy. It is important to strengthen such cooperation amid global economy uncertainty," he added.

 

>>23035962 Prabowo’s warm words for Albanese are tinged by a Russian shadow - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will back Indonesia’s inclusion in a free-trade deal that includes countries such as Japan, Canada and Mexico, in what would be a boost to the nation’s economy and further bolster its ties to Australia. In his first foreign visit since his May 3 election win, Albanese declared in Jakarta that he would support Indonesia’s bid to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership as well as the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Earlier, Albanese railed against Russia during a news conference before meeting with Prabowo, who visited Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin last year as president-elect. Their meeting comes weeks after respected military website Janes reported that Russia had lodged a formal request to base warplanes in Indonesia’s easternmost province, Papua, just 1400 kilometres from the Australian mainland - a report Indonesia’s Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin later denied. “Russia, of course, will try to increase its influence,” Albanese said, while dodging questions about what Moscow had or had not asked of Prabowo and the Indonesians. “We make very clear our position when it comes to Russia around the world - be it the brutal invasion of Ukraine, its interference in cybersecurity issues as well, its tolerance of criminal organisations that have been involved in that – are anathema to our values.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:54 a.m. No.23252187   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 50

Australian Politics and Society - Part 8

>>23041388 Ben Roberts-Smith loses appeal over war crimes judgment - After a seven-year defamation fight and tens of millions of dollars in legal costs, former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith has failed in his bid to overturn a landmark decision that found he committed war crimes in Afghanistan. The former Special Air Service corporal launched a court challenge to his comprehensive loss against The Age and The Sydney Morning Herald after a marathon defamation trial that was billed as a test of public interest reporting and a quasi war crimes investigation. But the Full Court of the Federal Court - Justices Nye Perram, Anna Katzmann and Geoffrey Kennett – unanimously dismissed his appeal on Friday and ordered him to pay the newspapers’ costs. Roberts-Smith was not in court to hear the judgment being delivered. The ruling was touted by Nine, the publisher of The Age and the Herald, as an “emphatic win” for investigative journalism. In a 2023 decision, Federal Court Justice Anthony Besanko upheld the newspapers’ truth defence and found Roberts-Smith was complicit in the murder of four unarmed prisoners while deployed in Afghanistan between 2009 and 2012. The appeal court said in a summary of its decision that “we are unanimously of the opinion that the evidence was sufficiently cogent to support the findings that [Roberts-Smith] … murdered four Afghan men”. Besanko’s decision was made to the civil standard, on the balance of probabilities, rather than the higher criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt. “I continue to maintain my innocence and deny these egregious spiteful allegations,” Roberts-Smith, a Victoria Cross recipient, said in a statement after the decision.

 

>>23041418 The seven words that ended Ben Roberts-Smith’s $1.5m appeal bid - The dismissal of Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation appeal was clinical in its execution. One by one, Federal Court Justice Nye Perram, on behalf of the full bench, brushed the disgraced soldier’s claims into a dustpan, and tipped them into the bin. Dozens of sleepless nights, thousands of hours of work, millions of dollars in costs. Lawyers estimate Roberts-Smith’s bid to overturn the court’s 2023 finding that he was a war criminal set both sides back a combined $4 million, coming on top of the $30 million spent on the original 110-day hearing. A late bid to re-open the appeal last month alone contributed $1.5 million to the total. Perram dispensed of it in seven words: “The application should be dismissed with costs.” Roberts-Smith released a statement outlining his intention to appeal to the High Court. “I continue to maintain my innocence and deny these egregious spiteful allegations,” he said.

 

>>23045675 Australia steps up bid for Pope Leo visit as PM visits Rome for inauguration - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met Catholic Church leaders in Rome ahead of the inauguration mass for Pope Leo XIV, joining them at a sanctuary church that welcomes visiting Australians. Albanese met Sydney Archbishop Anthony Fisher and Melbourne Archbishop Peter Comensoli at the church centre, which also houses Australians who have come to Rome for the mass. The church, called the Sanctuary of our Lady of Pompeii, has a connection with Pope Leo because he was elected by cardinals on May 8, the feast day for Our Lady of the Rosary of Pompeii. Albanese spoke briefly in the church’s rose garden, known as Domus Australia, about the importance of the inauguration mass for Australia’s 5 million Catholics. Earlier, the nation’s top diplomat at the Vatican, Keith Pitt, was stepping up attempts to bring Pope Leo to Australia in the first papal visit in two decades, in a key message ahead of the inauguration Mass on Sunday to confirm the new pope in office. The Australian ambassador-designate to the Holy See, also a former cabinet minister, Pitt was making the formal invitation one of the major priorities for the embassy as the new papacy begins. In an interview ahead of the inauguration Mass, Pitt named issues ranging from climate change, artificial intelligence and child sexual abuse as areas where the Australian government would seek to work with the new pope. He said Australia also wanted to work with Pope Leo and the Vatican on helping Pacific Island nations, a region with large numbers of Catholics.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:55 a.m. No.23252189   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 51

Australian Politics and Society - Part 9

>>23045726 Video: Wong, Albanese attack ‘sham’ 13-year Russian prison sentence for Oscar Jenkins - Foreign Minister Penny Wong says the Albanese government is appalled by the 13-year sentence in a Russian maximum-security prison handed to Australian Oscar Jenkins after he was convicted of fighting as a mercenary alongside Ukrainian forces. The 33-year-old from Melbourne, captured in December last year while serving in Ukraine’s military, was found guilty by a court in the Russian-controlled Luhansk region of eastern Ukraine. Russian authorities claimed Jenkins, a former biology teacher in China, was paid up to 800,000 rubles ($15,000) a month to participate in military operations against their troops in Ukraine. State-run media claimed he had “fully admitted his guilt”. Wong condemned the outcome, saying: “The Australian government is appalled at the sham trial and 13-year sentence given to Australian man Oscar Jenkins. “As a full-serving member of the regular armed forces of Ukraine, Mr Jenkins is a prisoner of war. The Australian government has made clear to Russia that Mr Jenkins must be given the protections afforded to him as a prisoner of war. Russia is obligated to treat him in accordance with international humanitarian law, including humane treatment.” Wong’s comments were echoed hours later by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. “Let’s be very clear. This sentence by Russia is an outrage - it is a continuation of the way they have behaved, abrogating their responsibilities,” he said, speaking to reporters in Rome. “This conflict began with them choosing to invade a sovereign nation, and their decision to abrogate their responsibility to uphold international law.”

 

>>23049366 Video: Albanese to meet Zelenskyy amid moves to secure release of Jenkins - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese is expected to meet Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Rome in the wake of the Inauguration Mass for Pope Leo XIV, as the government intensifies its efforts to free Australian man Oscar Jenkins from a Russian jail. Jenkins was captured in December last year after fighting for Ukraine, and earlier this week he was sentenced to 13 years in a Russian "penal colony" for fighting as a mercenary in the conflict. Mr Albanese slammed that decision as an "outrage" and called the legal process in Russia "very politicised" and invalid. He also said Russia was abrogating its responsibilities under international law because it had declared Jenkins a mercenary rather than an enemy combatant, which would impose additional obligations on Moscow. "It is a continuation of the way that they have behaved, abrogating their international responsibilities," he said. "This conflict began with them choosing to invade a sovereign nation and to abrogate their responsibility to uphold international law." The prime minister is expected to discuss Jenkins with the Ukraine president when they sit down on the sidelines of the massive gathering in Rome. Some analysts have speculated Australia might try to secure his freedom as part of a broader prisoner swap deal between Russia and Ukraine. Both countries made an in-principle agreement to swap 1,000 prisoners during a meeting held in Türkiye this week, although the two countries remain far apart on the fundamental issues that would underpin a deal.

 

>>23053629 Pope Leo vows not to be an autocrat, receives the ring of office - The faithful came in their thousands to see Pope Leo XIV begin his work as one of the world’s most powerful spiritual leaders, in a ceremony that combined ancient symbols and modern statecraft. Joining the faithful were national leaders, who networked before the Mass in their places at the front of the inauguration, proving the diplomatic reach of the Vatican. US Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio sat in the same area as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, European Union President Ursula von der Leyen and Prince Edward, representing King Charles. Zelensky and Vance shook hands - more than two months after the US vice president berated the Ukrainian president in the White House. Behind the scenes at the Mass, Rubio has spoken of the Vatican as a possible third party to host peace talks between Russia and Ukraine, highlighting the potential for the new Pope to become a trusted broker between states. The informal talks before the Mass gave Prime Minister Anthony Albanese time to speak with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and others. He met the Pope soon after the Mass, shaking hands briefly along with other leaders within the Vatican. Albanese was due to meet Zelensky and von der Leyen in separate talks after the Mass, as the ceremony gives way to an informal leadership gathering in Rome.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:55 a.m. No.23252190   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 52

Australian Politics and Society - Part 10

>>23053647 Video: Another Catholic in the crowd: Anthony Albanese joins thousands at Pope Leo XIV’s inauguration - In a sea of world leaders and ­ecstatic Catholics waiting for the era of Leo XIV to officially begin, Anthony Albanese stood out as much as any cardinal or nun in his Akubra. A Prime Minister at the height of his powers was among hundreds of dignitaries in Rome on Sunday, as he waited for the new Pope’s inauguration mass alongside the likes of JD Vance, Giorgia Meloni, new German chancellor Friedrich Merz and Prince Edward standing in for the King. Mr Albanese started his time in the Holy See with Australian bishops admiring the masterpieces and the godliness of a church that has stood for thousands of years. And he was due to end the day firmly in the present with meetings with Europe’s top official, ­Ursula von der Leyen, and Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky scheduled. But for a few moments, Mr Albanese was just another Catholic in the crowd watching the first American pope take his place in a 2000-year-old story. “When Pope Leo gave his address after his election, he spoke about peace and justice in the world,” Mr Albanese said ahead of the mass. “And following on from what I think was an extraordinary role that Pope Francis played in sending out that message of justice and looking after the vulnerable and the poor … is important in today’s world, where we have so much turbulence and people are looking for some constancy, and they’re looking for higher values and a belief, that is important.”

 

>>23053666 Video: Europe seeks defence pact with Australia as tanks head to Ukraine - The European Union is seeking a defence pact with Australia to deepen military co-operation in a move that highlights fears of a sharp increase in global instability. The EU put the proposal to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Rome on Sunday in the hope of matching other defence partnerships that have cleared the way for closer intelligence work and joint exercises. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen revealed the idea in talks with Albanese after the inaugural Mass for Pope Leo XIV at the Vatican, saying it could add to European military ties with South Korea and Japan. The sharper focus on military ties with Europe is part of a wider debate about global security after US President Donald Trump took office in January and began threatening allies such as Canada. Von der Leyen did not name Trump in her public remarks with Albanese, but she declared that the security outlook had grown worse since she spoke to the prime minister at a summit in Brazil in November. “The geopolitical tensions have massively increased,” she said before the private talks began. “The good thing is, Australia and Europe are reliable partners. We’re predictable. We share the same values. And this is the reason also that we do not only see you as a trading partner, but we see you as a strategic partner, and we would very much like to broaden this strategic partnership.”

 

>>23053676 Video: Europe eyes defence pact with Australia - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese held separate talks with EU president Ursula von der Leyen and Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of Pope Leo XIV’s inauguration mass on Sunday, assuring Mr Zelensky Australian tanks were on their way, as Russia’s brutal and ongoing invasion dominated discussions. At his meeting with the Ukrainian president, Mr Albanese pledged Australia’s continuing support for Kyiv’s fight against Russia and told Mr Zelensky that the promised M1A1 Abrams tanks were “on their way at the moment”. In April it was revealed that forty-nine Australian Army tanks promised to Ukraine six months ago were yet to leave the country. Mr Albanese also raised the fate of Melbourne man Oscar Jenkins, who was on Friday sentenced to 13 years in a Russian colony after being captured fighting for Ukraine. But he would not be drawn on whether he had asked Mr Zelensky to push for Mr Jenkins’s release in any future prisoner swap. “What we did was … in a diplomatic way, seek Ukraine’s further support for Oscar Jenkins,” he said. Mr Zelensky, who also met with US Vice President JD Vance in Rome and was expected to speak with Donald Trump by phone on Monday, thanked Mr Albanese for “the news of the tanks” and called for more economic sanctions against Russia. “Together we can really move this situation closer to peace with pressure on Russia and we are very thankful for sanctions,” he said. “I want to raise with you also this topic, which is very important, put more pressure, more sanctions on Russia.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:55 a.m. No.23252192   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 53

Australian Politics and Society - Part 11

>>23053683 The haunting plight of Oscar Jenkins: ‘It’s just cold. I don’t like the cold’ - In a dimly lit video posted quietly to YouTube, Oscar Jenkins sits slouched and unshaven, his bruised face drawn with fatigue. His speech is slow and fragmented, as if he is assembling thoughts under the weight of something unspoken. The unverified video, posted in March, is the first of Jenkins speaking at length seen outside the war zone since his capture by Russian forces in Ukraine. What emerges is not the voice of a hardened mercenary, as Russian prosecutors would later allege, but that of a conflicted man swept up in a war he barely understands. “Personally, I don’t want to be in Ukraine … I don’t know Ukrainian culture,” the 33-year-old former Melbourne Grammar School student tells a person off-camera, who appears to be one of his captors. “I don’t know Ukrainian people very well. It’s just cold. I don’t like the cold … However, if there is a just war, maybe it is this Ukraine war, on the Ukraine side.” Jenkins’ murky rationale is hardly the call to arms of a political zealot. “I’m not very political,” he says, admitting much of his knowledge of the conflict was gleaned from Wikipedia. This masthead has not been able to verify when, where or the circumstances in which the heavily edited, 11-minute video was made. Jenkins’ reflections veer between history, geopolitics and personal discomfort. He references the shared culture of Russia and Ukraine, and makes vague assertions about land and liberty. “I think they want resources and land,” Jenkins says. “I think Putin maybe, I don’t know him, is interested in also having more land for Russia, maybe the USSR he has dreams of.” Then comes a moment of unexpected clarity: “I don’t want a world where people kill each other. I would rather have a world where there’s all peace, security, freedom. The best, the best world.”

 

>>23058406 Video: Nationals call it quits on decades-long coalition with Liberals - The Nationals will split from the Liberal Party after days of negotiations between the two sides failed to result in a coalition agreement, breaking with a century-long tradition. Nationals leader David Littleproud made the announcement at Parliament House on Tuesday, describing it as one of the "hardest political decisions of his life". He told reporters the Nationals would continue to work constructively with the Liberal Party but they would not re-enter into a formal coalition agreement at this stage. "The National Party will sit alone on a principle basis," Mr Littleproud said. "On the basis of looking forward, not having to look back, and to try and actually regain important policy pieces that change the lives of the people we represent." Emboldened by an election result that saw the minor party retain nearly all of its lower house seats while the Liberal Party went backwards, Nationals MPs had previously flagged that the arrangement was up for discussion. The sticking points for the minor party were the continuation of a nuclear power policy, the Regional Australia Future Fund, and the desire for divestiture powers for supermarkets. Hours after the Nationals announcement, a disappointed Ms Ley said the minor party had sought commitments on specific policies during negotiations. "I proposed that we stand up a joint shadow ministry consisting of Liberal Party shadow ministers and National Party shadow ministers," she said. "And that we then work separately on policies, as we should, in our separate party rooms and come together articulating what those policies are at the right time. The Nationals did not agree to that approach." The Liberals also argued the Nationals would not explicitly agree to traditional shadow cabinet solidarity, which obliges frontbenchers to back Coalition policies. But Ms Ley said she remained a "committed coalitionist" and that her door was open to restarting negotiations, but added that a fully Liberal frontbench would be unveiled later this week.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:56 a.m. No.23252194   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 54

Australian Politics and Society - Part 12

>>23058411 Video: ‘Door remains open’ says Sussan Ley amidst shock Coalition split following federal election disaster - Nuclear energy has blown up a political agreement between the Nationals and the Liberals after leaders failed to reach common ground but left the door open for a reconciliation. The traditional political marriage couldn’t be consecrated following a disastrous result for the Coalition at the federal election with the Nationals standing firm on wanting to retain four key policies. These included remaining committed to nuclear energy, divestiture powers to break up big supermarkets, a $20 billion investment fund that would disperse $1 billion a year on regional infrastructure and universal phone services. Landlines and payphones must have service no matter where they are in Australia but this doesn’t extend to mobile phones, which the Nationals have been fighting to include. Nationals Leader David Littleproud said the party didn’t want to have to re-prosecute the case to retain the policies it fought for under the previous agreement in opposition. “It’s on a principled position of making sure that those hard-fought wins are maintained and respected and we continue to look forward,” Littleproud told reporters in Canberra on Tuesday. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley addressed the media in the afternoon, emphasising her commitment to the Coalition despite the recent split. “I really believe that the Coalition is stronger together, I am a committed Coalitionist,” she said. “I do pay tribute to my Liberal Party colleagues in this room now and their intention to work constructively for the future with new and different policies, but never stepping away from our timeless values. Our policies may change, our values never will. But we need to give that process due diligence and I, as leader, want to harness the real initiative, interest, talent and the smarts of so many.”

 

>>23058414 Anthony Albanese formally invites Pope Leo XIV to Australia in Vatican meeting - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has met privately with Pope Leo XIV at the Apostolic Palace in Vatican City, formally inviting the new pontiff to Australia for a major Catholic conference that Sydney will host in 2028. Mr Albanese met Leo XIV the day after the new pope's inaugural mass in Rome, hours after the pontiff met US Vice-President JD Vance. He is the first prime minister to have a private audience with the pope since Kevin Rudd, who met Pope Benedict XVI in 2008. The ABC has been told that Mr Albanese and the pope discussed their shared concerns about conflicts around the world and the humanitarian catastrophes they have wrought. The pope also blessed rosary beads that had been owned by the prime minister's mother Maryanne, a staunch Catholic who passed away in 2002. During their meeting on Monday local time, Mr Albanese gifted the new pope a framed Indigenous artwork by artist Amanda Westley, who is part of the Ngarrindjeri clan in South Australia. The prime minister also issued a formal letter of invitation to Pope Leo XIV to attend the International Eucharistic Congress, which Sydney will host in 2028. The congress is typically held every four years, and is expected to draw thousands of Catholics from around the world to Australia. Benedict XVI was the last pope to visit Australia, for World Youth Day in 2008. The prime minister had earlier met briefly with Pope Leo XIV on Sunday after the mass and had a "very warm" discussion before their longer meeting on Monday afternoon. Mr Albanese said that during that brief discussion, the pope had "expressed his affection for Australia". He said he had told Leo that Australia's 5 million Catholics "would be watching and wishing him well".

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:56 a.m. No.23252196   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 55

Australian Politics and Society - Part 13

>>23062839 Video: Liberals back Nationals' split as 'necessary reset' after election lashing - Some senior Liberals have quietly voiced support for the Nationals' decision to walk away from the Coalition, describing the dramatic split as a necessary - if uncomfortable — reset following the opposition's devastating federal election defeat, even as Liberal luminary John Howard calls on the parties to reunite. While few are willing to endorse the move publicly, multiple Liberal MPs told ABC News the Coalition had become politically untenable, with the Nationals increasingly seen as obstructive on key policy fronts - particularly on climate policy — and a drag in crucial metropolitan electorates. "This gives us breathing space," one MP said. "After a loss like that, everything has to be on the table." Another added: "This helps us as Liberals rebadge and reposition. It's clear that the link with the Nationals was compromising our policies and hurting our brand appeal, especially in the cities. "They were net beneficiaries in the relationship. We were net losers in electoral terms and the link with the 'climate deniers' of Barnaby [Joyce] and [Matt] Canavan hurt us greatly in cities, with women, and with non-boomer voters." A third Liberal was more philosophical: "Maybe you have to hit rock bottom before you start to rebuild and part of hitting rock bottom is this split."

 

>>23067420 Video: Coalition seeks to reverse break-up just two days after sensational split - The Coalition could come back together within weeks after Nationals leader David Littleproud and Liberal leader Sussan Ley agreed to put their next steps on hold while they search for a fix that will allow their MPs to walk back into parliament together. Littleproud announced the dramatic about-face in a snap press conference in Canberra on Thursday, just two days after he walked away from the Coalition partnership - the first split in 38 years. He said it followed a meeting with Ley on Thursday morning, in which he agreed to her request that he give her time to convene a meeting of Liberal MPs to discuss the Nationals’ four policy demands for a Coalition agreement. Both Littleproud and Ley had planned to unveil their separate portfolio spokespeople on Thursday afternoon. But Littleproud said he had sent his team home from Canberra “in good faith”, and that Ley would also refrain from unveiling her frontbench pending further Liberal party room meetings. “This is a positive step forward, one in which we’ve always said we’d be productive and constructive, and I think the Nationals have acted in good faith,” he said. “I’m proud to say that we’ll allow this process to take place and the Liberal Party to convene at whatever period is for them and convenient for them, and I think that is the way forward in a mature and sensible. I’ve always said that I’d be constructive moving forward … This will allow time for a process for Sussan Ley to call her party room together to discuss those four policy areas.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:56 a.m. No.23252197   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 56

Australian Politics and Society - Part 14

>>23067458 Video: ‘Look at Australia’: Trump ambushes South African president over ‘white genocide’ - US President Donald Trump confronted his South African counterpart with unfounded claims of a genocide of Afrikaner farmers, and ranted extensively about the American media, in another extraordinary and tense Oval Office meeting with a foreign leader. Trump dimmed the lights and played a video purporting to back up his assertions about the state-sanctioned mass murder of Afrikaners, the white ethnic minority that ruled South Africa during apartheid, as the country’s president, Cyril Ramaphosa, was made to watch. Trump twice cited Australia as evidence during the exchange, claiming both Australia and the United States were being flooded with white South African farmers. Dozens arrived in the US last week after the Trump administration fast-tracked their approval as refugees. “You take a look at Australia, they’re being inundated and we’re being inundated with people that want to get out,” Trump said. “This is a very serious situation and … if we had a real press, this would be exposed.” Trump held up printouts of articles about white farmers whom he said had been the victims of farm attacks, including robberies, land dispossession and murders. Gang violence is rife in South Africa, although as Ramaphosa and other officials pointed out during the Oval Office meeting, most murder victims in South Africa are black. “You’re taking people’s land away from them,” Trump told Ramaphosa. “We have not,” Ramaphosa responded. Trump continued: “And those people in many cases are being executed. And they happen to be white, and most of them happen to be farmers. That’s a tough situation, I don’t know how you explain that. How do you explain that? “We have thousands of people that want to come into our country. They’re also going to Australia, in a smaller number … They’re white farmers and they feel like they’re going to die.” Later, the White House issued links to several media reports it said proved Trump was right about the situation in South Africa. It included two reports from Australia’s news.com.au from 2017 and 2018, and a television editorial by Sky News Australia’s Rita Panahi.

 

>>23067527 Investigators probe Ben Roberts-Smith over more murders and video drinking from dead man’s prosthetic limb - The secretive agency investigating war criminal Ben Roberts-Smith over multiple murders, including cases not canvassed in his marathon defamation trial, has secured the co-operation of new witnesses. Amid the damning fresh evidence is footage of the disgraced ex-soldier swilling beer from the prosthetic leg of an Afghan man he executed. Roberts-Smith’s comprehensive loss before the full bench of the Federal Court - which affirmed the finding that the Special Air Service Regiment veteran ordered the murder of four Afghans – paves the way for the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) to move to prosecute the former corporal. The OSI is examining suspected murders beyond the four cases that were part of the ex-soldier’s failed bid to clear his name. Five sources with knowledge of the OSI’s ongoing four-year investigation said its investigators had secured co-operation from key witnesses who had not participated in Roberts-Smith’s defamation trial. The OSI is working closely with the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions as it builds its case against Roberts-Smith, having collected statements from over a dozen SASR soldiers who claim Roberts-Smith arranged or participated in executions, including an incident in which he kicked a bound civilian off a small cliff. The OSI has also uncovered a video of Roberts-Smith drinking from the prosthetic leg of a man he had earlier executed during an Easter Sunday 2009 operation targeting a compound called Whiskey 108. The video was filmed in a makeshift bar called the Fat Lady’s Arms at the Australian army base in southern Afghanistan and contradicts Roberts-Smith’s evidence during his defamation trial when he told Justice Anthony Besanko he had never drunk from the plastic leg.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:57 a.m. No.23252199   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 57

Australian Politics and Society - Part 15

>>23072269 Liberals and Nationals closer on Coalition fix, spotlight moves to Littleproud leadership - The Liberal and National parties are inching towards reforming the Coalition after Liberal MPs gave Sussan Ley in-principle agreement for most of David Littleproud’s policy demands, but speculation is growing about Littleproud’s future as leader of the regional party. Ley convened a lively party room meeting on Friday afternoon at which her MPs gave their leader the authority to strike a deal with the Nationals to create a joint shadow cabinet by the time parliament resumes, days after Littleproud sparked chaos by splitting from the Liberals. Critically, the Nationals ditched the plan to build seven nuclear power sites, paving the way for a watered-down Coalition policy to merely lift the moratorium and allow for potential private investment into nuclear energy. The in-principle agreement does not extend to the precise details of Littleproud’s demands, which are still due to be thrashed out in a shadow cabinet. Moderate Liberal MPs expressed concerns about Littleproud’s demand, first reported in this masthead, to extend forced supermarket break-up laws to big-box retailers such as Chemist Warehouse and Officeworks. Liberals also have doubts about the administration and funding of the $20 billion regional building fund, highlighting the potential for a bumpy path back to reunification. The turbulent week in right-wing politics has led to chatter inside the Nationals about whether Littleproud could survive the affair. His leadership is bolstered by the lack of widespread support for any other contender, but former leader Barnaby Joyce told at least one colleague on Friday that Littleproud’s position was precarious.

 

>>23072429 Kevin Rudd says Donald Trump’s ban on foreign students at Harvard is ‘distressing’ - Donald Trump’s administration on Thursday revoked Harvard’s right to enrol foreign students - more than a quarter of its annual intake – in a major escalation of the President’s fight with one of the world’s most storied universities. The university in Cambridge, Massachusetts, quickly slammed the move as “unlawful” and said it would hurt both the campus and the country, while one student said the community was “panicking”. Australia’s US Ambassador Kevin Rudd said the decision to block foreign students from enrolling at Harvard University was “distressing” for Australian students. Mr Rudd says he is working with the Trump administration following its decision. “We are monitoring closely developments at Harvard University in relation to the administration’s statement this afternoon on the future enrolment of international students,” Dr Rudd wrote in a post to social media platform X on Friday. “I know this will be distressing for Harvard’s many Australian students. The Embassy is working with the United States Government to obtain the details of this decision so that Australian students can receive appropriate advice.” According to the Ivy League institution, approximately 120 Australian students are enrolled at the university. The decision dramatically deepens the rift between Mr Trump and the university, and will force thousands of international students enrolled at the university to either relocate to another institution or leave the US entirely. Mr Trump is furious at Harvard, which has produced 162 Nobel prize-winners, for rejecting his demand that it submit to oversight on admissions and hiring over his claims that it is a hotbed of anti-Semitism and “woke” liberal ideology.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:57 a.m. No.23252200   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 58

Australian Politics and Society - Part 16

>>23079989 Taylor, Tehan and Paterson set for security roles in Ley’s top team - Sussan Ley and David Littleproud have agreed that the Nationals will receive six shadow cabinet spots and two outer ministry positions as part of negotiations on a Coalition frontbench that is expected to see Ms Ley’s Liberal rival, Angus Taylor, receive the foreign affairs or defence portfolio. After a tumultuous week that resulted in the Liberal and Nationals leaders poised to announce separate ministries as late as Thursday morning, Ms Ley and Mr Littleproud restarted talks on a Coalition agreement at the weekend and are expected to come to a position on the shadow ministry and policies such as ­nuclear energy in coming days. While Ms Ley reached out to former Nationals leaders Michael McCormack and Barnaby Joyce to broker a resolution to the split before Mr Littleproud agreed to renegotiate, ­neither MP expects to receive a frontbench position thanks to their roles in fuelling Nationals leadership speculation in recent days. “Barnaby (Joyce) and I will still contribute if we’re not selected in that leadership team. And who knows, we’ll probably be sitting up the back together,” Mr McCormack said. Despite suggestions within the Nationals that Mr Littleproud would not remain leader in “the long term” after his decision to split from the Coalition and then backflip on that decision, Mr Littleproud on Sunday said he was “relaxed” about his position. “The vast majority of my partyroom decided to leave the ­Coalition. I enacted what was directed,” he said on Sky News.

 

>>23079997 OPINION: Roberts-Smith’s rabid band of supporters has an outspoken new member - Gina Rinehart - "“What went on over there, stays over there.” - “You can’t judge combat from the comfort of an armchair.” - “What right have you to tear down our heroes?” - “It’s war, for god’s sake.” - Since the first public challenges to Victoria Cross recipient Ben Roberts-Smith’s reputation in 2017, those words, this retaliatory refrain, has been unrelenting and unchanged. All in the face of profound evidence revealing Australia’s most decorated living soldier is a war criminal. After last week’s 245-page rejection of Roberts-Smith’s Federal Court appeal and Justice Anthony Besanko’s 726-page ruling in 2023, the keen eyes of four judges have now found to a civil court standard that Roberts-Smith murdered four captives in Afghanistan. Under the Geneva Convention and Australia’s own laws of armed conflict, executing detainees is unlawful. But there are rules and there are norms, and the norms according to the “it’s war” apologists are based on an insiders’ “take no prisoners” realpolitik. Within the Defence diaspora, online debate runs hot and loud. The “I stand with Ben” brigade is undeterred by the court rulings. Brigadier Adrian d’Hage, former head of Defence public relations who was awarded a Military Cross for his service in Vietnam, is taking them on. And he’s far from alone among soldiers with combat experience disavowing the so-called realists’ justification for murder. “That is not the way we fight. We have a long and hard-won reputation as being feared fighters, but fighters who engage according to the Geneva Convention,” d’Hage says. Billionaire Kerry Stokes has spent millions on Roberts-Smith’s case. Multi-millionaire John Singleton funded a full-page newspaper advertisement describing attacks on the war hero as “disgraceful”. And now Australia’s richest person, Gina Rinehart, is quoted querying why this “brave and patriotic man” should be “under such attack”. I can only wonder what is in their minds. Do they believe that in their real world, ruthlessness is a necessity that should be honoured?" - Chris Masters, Gold Walkley award-winning journalist and the first Australian journalist to be embedded with special forces in Afghanistan - theage.com.au

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:58 a.m. No.23252201   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 59

Australian Politics and Society - Part 17

>>23080001 Video: Footage released of Qld man feared dead in Ukraine - Ukraine’s Ambassador to Australia has released footage of the Queenslander feared dead in “Russian-controlled territory”, offering a glimpse into his efforts during the war. Gladstone builder, Caleb List, joined the Ukrainian foreign legion after he was rejected by the Australian Army. It is understood Mr List went missing and is believed to have been killed following fighting in the Kharkiv region last month. The YouTube video, posted by Ambassador of Ukraine to Australia, Vasul Myroshnychenko on Saturday, offered a glimpse into Mr List’s life on the Ukrainian front lines, where he had been fighting since 2022. At the start of the video, Mr List talks to the camera, stating, “It’s a good fight. It’s a necessary fight, so that is why I am here in the cold freezing my arse off”. A montage of photos and snippets of his efforts with the Ukrainian Army follows, including videos of Mr List during training exercises, working on the ground, and joking with fellow soldiers. The caption for the YouTube video read that it would be “known for certain” whether Mr List was dead once his body, which remained in Russian-controlled territory, could be recovered and identified. “For now, I ask you to remember Caleb. If he is alive, we will work on getting him swapped,” the caption read. “If he is dead, we will mourn him and will never forget his ultimate sacrifice.”

 

>>23090691 Coalition gets back together after week-long split - The Liberal and National parties have struck a deal to reunify, a week after the Coalition's extraordinary split in the wake of a ruinous election defeat. The ABC has been told a press conference will be held later today, and that frontbench positions are being allocated. Nationals Leader David Littleproud announced last Tuesday that his party would be ending the Coalition Agreement with the Liberals over four policy issues the party demanded be kept. Days later, the Liberal Party agreed in principle not to include those policies - nuclear power, a Regional Australia Future Fund, break-up powers for the supermarket sector and better mobile coverage in the bush — in a sweeping review of the Coalition's election loss. The Liberals and Nationals will not pursue their election commitment to build seven nuclear power plants, but will continue to push to lift the national ban on nuclear power. The parties have also negotiated a position on three other election commitments: to introduce divestiture powers that could be used to break up supermarket and hardware store chains found to be abusing their market power, a $20 billion future fund that could be drawn down on to pay for regional services and infrastructure, and minimum broadband speeds of at least 25Mbs and basic mobile service requirements for regional and rural Australia.

 

>>23090698 Jane Hume dumped, Jacinta Nampijinpa Price demoted in Sussan Ley’s new shadow cabinet - Sussan Ley has dumped work-from-the-office policy architect Jane Hume from shadow cabinet and demoted conservative stalwart Jacinta Nampijinpa Price in a major refresh of her depleted Coalition team. After repairing the Coalition deal following a week of chaos on Wednesday, the Opposition Leader and Nationals leader David Littleproud announced a new opposition frontbench in Canberra. Senator Hume was the highest-profile casualty of the shuffle, losing a position on the frontbench altogether. The Victorian had suffered significant backlash within Coalition ranks after her push to get public servants to stop working from home was successfully weaponised by Labor, and her comments claiming “Chinese spies” could be working on polling booths went viral. After Senator Hume supported Angus Taylor in the Liberal leadership ballot, Ms Ley claimed she had a big future ahead of her, despite having just removed her entirely from the frontbench. Senator Price, who abandoned the Nationals for the Liberals in a failed run for the latter’s deputy leadership, has been pushed to the outer shadow ministry and will be the spokeswoman for defence personnel.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:58 a.m. No.23252204   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 60

Australian Politics and Society - Part 18

>>23090699 Tesla wins council approval for new factory in South Australia despite vocal anti-Musk sentiment - Elon Musk’s Tesla is one step closer to opening a factory in Adelaide despite overwhelming community opposition expressing “anti-Tesla and anti-Elon Musk sentiment”. On Tuesday night the City of Marion council voted to seek state government approval to sell the site to a developer who will build a battery-repurposing factory, a showroom and servicing facilities. Environmental concerns and worries the site will draw protesters were cited by those opposed to the plan. Ninety-five per cent of submissions called for the application to be rejected. Many voiced their opposition with words that were censored in the city’s official records, such as “Elon Musk and Tesla are a [redacted] on humanity”. Tesla sales have slumped amid a backlash against Musk for his work for the Trump administration, including slashing funding for government departments through his “department of government efficiency”, as well as his ideology and actions including what some saw as an apparent fascist salute. But Marion’s mayor, Kris Hanna, said blocking the sale of the site would have no impact on Musk and would have cost 100 local jobs. Hanna said the site’s soil was contaminated and not safe for recreation, so “it makes sense to have it sealed over with a renewable technology facility”. “If we didn’t proceed, it would have cost 100 jobs to local residents but it would have had no impact on Elon Musk,” he said. “Tesla would almost certainly find somewhere else in Australia to build their factory.” The factory is to be used to recover and recycle Tesla lithium-ion batteries.

 

>>23092967 Australia: They use mass immigration to create a housing crisis, which they use to push more people into renting - “You will own nothing” - In the following essay, Alison Bevege details how the housing crisis in Australia has been deliberately created using mass immigration. As housing becomes unaffordable for native Australians, large corporations swoop in to “save the day” by constructing build-to-rent tower blocks. In the vein of WEF’s “you will own nothing,” build-to-rent homes create permanent renters. “They want private property ownership phased out in favour of build-to-rent,” Bevege writes. When the housing crisis seems to be waning, the cycle begins again. The corporations which are building properties for rent lobby the government to increase migration, creating a housing crisis, which the lobbyists then use to remove more private ownership of property by building properties to rent. Using immigration, they have found a way to create a permanent crisis for which their solution, so they will tell you, is required. The Australian government has announced that it wants to import 13.5 million migrants by 2065, averaging 235,000 additional migrants each year. That’s enough immigrants per year to keep the housing crisis scam going for the next 40 years. This scam is not only affecting Australians; it is a global affair. The same scam is operating in the UK and the US, and some of the corporations involved are Canadian.

 

>>23094571 Australia will keep pushing US to drop Trump tariffs after court ruling, trade minister says - Australia will continue to push Donald Trump to abandon his administration’s tariff regime entirely, after a US court blocked the president’s “liberation day” tariffs from coming into effect. The Manhattan-based court of international trade said the US constitution gives the Congress exclusive powers to regulate commerce with other countries, and ruled that power was not superseded by the president’s self-declared “emergency” he cited to safeguard the US economy. The Trump White House filed an appeal against the judgment minutes after it was handed down. The regime imposed a 10% across-the-board tariff on all Australian imports to the US. Several specific products, including steel and aluminium, are subject to higher tariff rates, up to 25%, which are not impacted by the court’s ruling. The Australian trade minister, Don Farrell, said the Australian government would agitate for tariffs on Australian goods to be dumped entirely. “We will study this ruling of the US Federal Courts on reciprocal tariffs closely and note that they may be subject to further legal processes through the courts,” he said. “The Albanese Government has been consistent in the view that these tariffs on Australian imports into the US are unjustified,” Farrell said. “We will continue to engage and strongly advocate for the removal of tariffs.” The US court found Trump overstepped his authority by imposing across-the-board tariffs on imports from countries all over the world. Trump called the tariffs, announced on 2 April, America’s “liberation day”.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:58 a.m. No.23252205   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 61

Australian Politics and Society - Part 19

>>23094582 Video: Kevin Rudd says Australia can solve US critical minerals dilemma - Kevin Rudd says a draft accord proposed by Australia and presented to the Trump administration would allow the US to effectively become self-reliant in critical minerals, bolstering American economic resilience against China and strengthening ties between Canberra and Washington. Speaking at the Mackinac Policy Conference in Detroit, Dr Rudd said there were opportunities to enhance collaboration with America in the areas of critical minerals and by tapping the power of Australian superannuation funds for US-based investments - including in Michigan. The Australian ambassador also identified a key challenge for democracies in an era of growing political polarisation - the prevention of social disruption which threatened to break the “democratic contract between government and the governed”. A failure on this score would lead people to “look for alternatives”, he said. Speaking in conversation with Sandy Baruah, the chief executive of the Detroit Regional Chamber, Dr Rudd warned that China was seeking to entrench its dominance “across the 50 categories of critical minerals” designated by the US government. “The President of the United States has said this is a strategic priority. We agree with him,” he said. “The geology of the United States does not permit you to be self-reliant in all 50 because they’re not all here. But if you add Canada and Australia, you are. So what we need to work out - and we have a draft accord with the administration at present on these questions – is how do we collaborate both on the mining, the extraction, the transportation and the processing and the stockpiling to make our economies resilient, including what you’ll need for future battery manufacture for the future.”

 

>>23094587 War crimes investigator launches raids in major escalation - The elite anti-war crimes agency probing the involvement of ex-SAS soldiers in executions in Afghanistan conducted surprise raids in Perth on Wednesday as part of its ongoing investigations. It is the first time the Office of the Special Investigator (OSI) has launched raids on targets and amounts to a major escalation of its almost five-year inquiry into civilian deaths at the hands of Australian soldiers. The raids were confirmed by three official sources not permitted to speak publicly about the agency’s work. It is not clear if the raids were connected to the OSI’s examination of disgraced former soldier Ben Roberts-Smith, although detectives from the agency have spent months finalising the statements of witnesses who have agreed to testify against the disgraced war hero over his execution of prisoners and civilians. The OSI is examining suspected murders beyond the four cases that were part of the ex-soldier’s failed bid to clear his name. Witness statements collected by the OSI also deal with attempts by Roberts-Smith to cover up his war crimes. The raids were welcomed by SAS veterans who served in Afghanistan and who believe Roberts-Smith and the small number of other soldiers who allegedly executed civilians and prisoners brought shame onto the special forces regiment and should be held to account. However, veterans who back the war crimes suspects turned to social media to attack the OSI actions, claiming the raids were unjust. One post claimed the war crimes investigators, who include some of Australia’s most experienced homicide detectives, were trying to “shake the tree” to find evidence.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 12:59 a.m. No.23252207   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 62

Australian Politics and Society - Part 20

>>23099153 Video: Call to arm: US in direct defence spending plea to Richard Marles - Donald Trump’s Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth has issued a direct call for Australia to lift defence spending in face-to-face talks with Richard Marles, amid a US push for its global allies to stop free-riding off American military power. The Defence Minister assured his US counterpart that Australia was “very much up for that ­conversation”, just a day after Anthony Albanese ridiculed the nation’s top strategic think tank over its criticism of Australia’s “business as usual” defence budget. The US Defence Secretary’s call comes ahead of the Prime Minister’s first meeting with the US President in a fortnight at the G7 summit in Canada, where Mr Albanese will be looking for tariff ­relief and a firm commitment from Mr Trump to the AUKUS nuclear submarine partnership. The government left the ­defence budget languishing at about 2 per cent of GDP in the March budget, rising to a forecast 2.33 per cent in eight years, despite its own warnings of unprecedented strategic circumstances and US calls for allies to lift military spending to at least 3 per cent of national output. Mr Marles revealed Mr Hegseth urged him to boost the ­defence budget when they met on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Friday.

 

>>23103541 Video: ‘Unjustified’: Donald Trump claims steel tariff will double, as Australia lashes surprise move - Donald Trump has claimed the tariff rate on steel will double to 50 per cent, drawing the ire of the Australian government. The US President blurted out the latest development in his trade war at a steel mill rally in Pennsylvania, on Saturday morning Australian time. Australian Trade Minister Don Farrell said the latest tariff hike was unjustified. Mr Farrell has flagged a meeting, brokered by US Ambassador Kevin Rudd, with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer in Paris sometime next week. “This is certainly not the act of a friend, we’ve had a very long and trusting relationship with the United States… We’re going to coolly and calmly argue for the removal of these tariffs,” Minister Farrell said. The Labor minister pointed to the government’s track record negotiating with China on tariffs imposed on Australian products during the Morrison government. He will also meet with Chinese trade representatives on Monday for the 10th time which he says will ensure continued “tariff-free” trade with the nation’s biggest trading partner. Earlier in the day, Mr Farrell said Australia’s position had been consistent and clear. “These tariffs are … an act of economic self harm that will only hurt consumers and businesses who rely on free and fair trade. We will continue to engage and advocate strongly for the removal of the tariffs.”

 

>>23103570 Video: ‘Real and could be imminent’: Hegseth warns on China threat, says US ready to fight - US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has delivered a blistering warning to China that America stands ready to “fight and win decisively” if it seeks military conflict over Taiwan, declaring the threat posed is real and could be imminent. In a strident speech to top defence officials from across the Indo-Pacific, Hegseth said the region was America’s “priority theatre” and declared the Trump administration had a renewed focus on deterring China. He said the US would not instigate conflict with China or seek regime change, but in a significant declaration of policy said “we will not be pushed out of this critical region, and we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated”. “There’s no reason to sugar coat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,” he said in the speech to the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Asia’s leading security conference. America’s goal was to prevent war through forceful deterrence, he said - but if that failed, the US would act. “If deterrence fails and if called upon by my commander in chief, we are prepared to do what the Department of Defence does best, to fight and win decisively,” Hegseth said. Hegseth’s remarks are some of the strongest to date from the Trump administration about its preparedness to defend the Indo-Pacific with military force in the face of increasing Chinese territorial aggression in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea. He also used the speech on Saturday to press US partners in Asia to boost defence spending towards 5 per cent of gross domestic product. Hegseth had already pushed his Australian counterpart, Richard Marles, to ramp up defence spending to counter China’s increasing assertiveness. Marles declined to divulge what figure the pair discussed, but the demand would likely mean billions of dollars in extra defence funding.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1 a.m. No.23252209   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 63

Australian Politics and Society - Part 21

>>23103619 ‘Peace through strength’: Marles backs Hegseth after ‘stark’ China warning - Defence Minister Richard Marles has endorsed a blistering address by his US counterpart warning China that America stands ready to “fight and win decisively” if Beijing seeks military conflict over Taiwan. In a strident speech to top defence officials from across the Indo-Pacific on Saturday, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said the region was America’s “priority theatre” and that the threat posed by China is real - and potentially imminent. Speaking to this masthead after the address - the first major declaration of the Trump administration’s Indo-Pacific policy – Marles described it as “a very clear articulation of American intent, that what they seek is peace through strength”. “It gives us a lot to work with in terms of working with this administration … there was a really clear focus on allies and partners,” Marles said in an interview on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Security Dialogue, Asia’s premier defence summit, in Singapore on Saturday. “One of our key concerns is that we have witnessed with China the biggest conventional military build-up of any country since the end of the Second World War, and that has happened without strategic reassurance or transparency.” Hegseth used his speech to send the message that the US would not instigate conflict with China or seek regime change, while reassuring allies the US was prepared to defend the region in the face of China’s increasing territorial aggression in the Taiwan Strait and South China Sea, saying “we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated”. Hegseth also made clear the Trump administration would push its Asian allies to ramp up defence spending to near 5 per cent of gross domestic product, in line with commitments by NATO partners, which he claimed were spending more to combat a less formidable threat.

 

>>23106959 ‘We’ll determine our defence policy’: PM pushes back on Hegseth pressure over China - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has pushed back on US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth’s calls for Australia to ramp up its defence spending to counter China’s growing assertiveness in the Indo-Pacific region. Hegseth made the request to Defence Minister Richard Marles when the pair met on Friday on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore, where the US defence chief later delivered a strident speech warning China posed a real and potentially imminent threat to the region. But on Sunday, Albanese defended Australia’s defence spending and policy settings when asked about Hegseth’s remarks, and whether Australia would lift its defence budget to 3 per cent of gross domestic product - the figure the Trump administration has previously nominated. “What we’ll do is we’ll determine our defence policy, and we’ve invested just across the forward [estimates], an additional $10 billion in defence. What we’ll do is continue to provide for investing in our capability but also investing in our relationships in the region,” Albanese said at a press conference in Tasmania. “Our position with regard to Taiwan is very clear, has been for a long period of time, which is a bipartisan position to support the status quo.” The prime minister’s comments on defence spending contrast with those made by Marles, who has also defended the government’s investment but has said that Australia was “absolutely up for having this conversation” with the US about increasing it further.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1 a.m. No.23252210   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 64

Australian Politics and Society - Part 22

>>23106961 Albanese urged to confront Trump in person after doubling down on tariffs - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has condemned Donald Trump’s latest tariff salvo on Australian metals, describing it as reckless as the opposition urged Albanese to confront the US president about the trade strikes during a coming meeting. On Saturday, Trump said he would double tariffs on steel and aluminium imports to 50 per cent, days after the Court of International Trade found Trump had overstepped his authority to enact a baseline 10 per cent blanket tariff on all types of goods. The steel and aluminium tariffs were underpinned by a different set of laws to the 10 per cent across-the-board tariff, meaning Australia must secure an exemption to get out of it. The US eliminated tariffs on British steel and aluminium in a deal with UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in May, creating a precedent for Australia to strike a similar agreement when Albanese and Trump meet for the first time this month. They are expected to meet either on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada or during a trip to the US. Speaking in Hobart on Sunday, Albanese said the new trade barrier, which will affect about $1 billion worth of Australian metal exports, represented an “inappropriate action by the Trump Administration”. “This is an act of economic self-harm by the United States that will increase the cost for consumers in the United States,” he said, echoing the language he used after Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs. “Because it is [applied] across the board, what it will do is not create any comparative advantage or disadvantage for Australia compared with other countries that export into the United States. This is something that will just increase the cost for consumers in the United States.”

 

>>23111511 US asked Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP - Australia has been asked to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP “as soon as possible,” with the request being relayed directly from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the Shangri La Dialogue in Singapore. This is a major increase on the current levels of defence spending and would require the government to pour many tens of billions of extra money into the defence budget. It is also a significant step-up on the three per cent of GDP that US Under Secretary of Defence for Policy, Elbridge Colby, had signalled was needed in his nomination hearing in March. The American readout of the meeting between Mr Hegseth and Mr Marles, who is also the Australian Defence Minister, stated that the two men “discussed aligning investment to the security environment in the Indo-Pacific, accelerating US force posture initiatives in Australia, advancing defence industrial base co-operation, and creating supply chain resilience.” However, it also noted that, “on defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible.” The US is pushing its allies and partners across the world to contribute more to their own defence rather than seeking to free ride on the American defence shield and nuclear umbrella. Mr Marles previously acknowledged that Mr Hegseth had urged Australia to increase defence spending following their meeting late last week. But he did not disclose the exact increase requested by his US counterpart.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:01 a.m. No.23252211   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 65

Australian Politics and Society - Part 23

>>23111526 Video: Albanese government must decide how to respond to Trump call on defence spending - "After being spectacularly called out by the Trump administration over its go-slow increase in defence spending, the Albanese government now faces a dilemma of its own making about how to respond. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has deliberately provoked Australia by publicly stating the Trump administration wants a dramatic increase in spending from 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent. Hegseth did not need to reveal this request publicly, but chose to do so in order to increase pressure on Australia to lift its contribution to regional and global security. Indeed Defence Minister Richard Marles tried to hide the specifics of their meeting in Singapore by failing to mention the 3.5 per cent figure to Australian media. Why was Marles so shy? Because it now puts the Albanese government in a very awkward spot - a spot for which it alone is responsible. If the government rushes to increase defence spending now, it risks being seen as a lackey of Trump and would make a lie of Albanese’s insistence that “we’ll determine our defence policy”. Yet to do nothing and completely ignore the requests of our closest ally - a country which is asking all of its allies to step up around the world – makes Australia appear like a laggard on collective global security at a time of grave strategic uncertainty. Such a vocal call-out by the Trump administration would not have been necessary if the government had done the right thing before the election and pledged a meaningful increase in defence spending." - Cameron Stewart - theaustralian.com.au

 

>>23111593 Taiwan tipping point as US-Australia forces prepare for war - Australia and the US have ­elevated military exercises and ­security agency co-operation to a war footing amid China’s unprecedented armed forces build-up in the Indo-Pacific and fears Xi ­Jinping could imminently move to invade Taiwan, triggering a major global conflict. The new flashpoint in US-China relations was sparked when US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth warned Beijing was preparing to potentially use military force to “alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific” and that Mr Xi had ordered his armed forces to be capable of invading Taiwan by 2027. Mr Hegseth’s speech, at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, which was immediately ­attacked by Chinese officials who cautioned the US to not “play with fire” on Taiwan, came amid an ongoing build up of American military personnel in Australia. The US has been strengthening its military presence in northern Australia and enhancing collaboration with Australian defence and security agencies as it prepares for the prospect of regional conflict with China. With close to 2500 marines rotating through the Northern Territory, the US military presence in Australia has hit its highest levels since the end of World War II. More than 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations will participate in the 11th Exercise Talisman Sabre, led by Australia and the US, from July 13 to August 4. The largest ever Talisman Sabre will be staged at sites in Australia and, for the first time, Papua New Guinea, consisting of live-fire and field training exercises, force preparation activities, amphibious landings, ground force manoeuvres, air combat and maritime operations.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:01 a.m. No.23252213   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 66

Australian Politics and Society - Part 24

>>23111605 ''Talisman Sabre 2025:'' United Kingdom’s flagship carrier HMS Prince of Wales leads Strike Group heading to Darwin - A powerful British Carrier Strike Group is heading to Darwin. The Strike Group is led by the United Kingdom’s flagship carrier HMS Prince of Wales and will be accompanied by the Royal Navy’s destroyer HMS Dauntless and frigate HMS Richmond. It will be the first time since in almost two decades that a British carrier will visit Australia. Australian Minister for Defence Industry and Pacific Island Affairs Pat Conroy confirmed the Carrier Strike group’s Darwin visit and its participation in Exercise Talisman Sabre. In an address to the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore, Mr Hegseth said the threat posed by China to the region’s balance of power was real. Defence Minister Richard Marles said Australia cannot rely on the United States alone to counter China’s military strength in the Indo-Pacific. Minister Conroy said Australia and the United Kingdom stand shoulder to shoulder against challenges to the rules-based global order. “We’re very excited to see the carrier strike group in Australian waters.” Exercise Talisman Sabre 2025 has 19 nations taking part. It is a large-scale, multinational military exercise hosted by Australia. It will be the eleventh iteration of the exercise and will focus on multi-domain war fighting, including land, air, sea, space, and cyber domains. The exercise will involve more than 30,000 personnel and will take place from July 13 to August 4, 2025. For the first time, Talisman Sabre 2025 will include activities in Papua New Guinea, in addition to areas across Australia.

 

>>23111605 Talisman Sabre -Magic Sword- https://''www.youtube.com/watch?v=G02wKufX3nw'' - https://qalerts.pub/?q=Operation+Specialists - https://qalerts.pub/?q=magic - https://qresear.ch/?q=Talisman+Sabre

 

>>23115808 Video: Greens aghast as Dorinda Cox jumps ship to Labor - Dorinda Cox’s shock defection from the Greens to Labor has blindsided her former colleagues and angered ex-staffers who had complained of bullying during their time in her office. Senator Cox appeared alongside Anthony Albanese at Perth’s Kings Park on Monday just over an hour after she called Greens leader Larissa Waters to inform her of her decision. The West Australian senator’s defection followed months of internal conflict within the Greens over Senator Cox, the failure of her bid to become deputy leader in the wake of last month’s dismal election showing, and the growing realisation that she was not going to be preselected in a winnable position on the party’s next Senate ticket. Several former staffers to Senator Cox came forward last year with claims that they had been bullied by the senator and had ­endured a toxic workplace environment marred by extremely high levels of staff turnover. While her parliamentary colleagues had been broadly supportive of the senator in the wake of last year’s bullying allegations, many of the rank-and-file Greens members in Western Australia are understood to have seen things very differently. She had also long ago lost the support of the party’s Indigenous faction, the Blak Greens, and many prominent members of the Indigenous community. Senator Cox had a fractious relationship with another Greens Senate ­defector, Lidia Thorpe, and had been concerned about reports - denied by Senator Thorpe – that her rival still had influence over the Greens.

 

>>23115822 ‘All dealt with’: Albanese defends Greens defector after bullying allegations - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese insists bullying complaints against West Australian senator Dorinda Cox were dealt with appropriately as he hailed her shock defection from the Greens to join his government. The move represents a body blow to the Greens, which lost three of its four lower house seats, including that of former leader Adam Bandt, at the election but had held its ground in the Senate. Cox said she only informed new Greens leader Larissa Waters of her decision 90 minutes before Albanese held an afternoon press conference with Cox in Perth on Monday before a cabinet meeting in the state on Tuesday. “I have reached a conclusion after deep and careful reflection that my values and priorities are more aligned with Labor than the Greens,” Cox said. “I’ve worked hard to make Australia fairer and much more reconciled. But recently, I’ve lost some confidence in the capacity for the Greens to assist me in being able to progress this.” Albanese said the problems had been addressed. “We examined everything that had been considered in the past. Those issues were dealt with appropriately. My government has established very clear guidelines,” Albanese said. “They were all dealt with in Senator Cox’s case and dealt with appropriately.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:03 a.m. No.23252216   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 67

Australian Politics and Society - Part 25

>>23115832 Bullying complaints against Labor’s Dorinda Cox ‘not over’ - Indigenous and Jewish leaders have questioned Dorinda Cox’s decision to defect from the Greens to Labor, with one of the senator’s former staffers warning that bullying allegations against the senator are not settled. Senator Cox made the shock announcement of her move to Labor on Monday, just weeks after she missed out on the deputy leadership of the Greens. She said her switch - which also came days after Environment Minister Murray Watt approved the North West Shelf gas extension she had opposed – showed that her “values and priorities are more aligned with Labor”. The West Australian senator looked increasingly unlikely to secure a winnable spot on the Greens’ next Senate ticket amid tensions between her and party members. Senator Cox last year apologised after multiple staff came forward with allegations that they had been bullied during their time in her office, and many grassroots Greens members and the Blak Greens faction are angry about what they see as a lack of action from the top of the party in response to those complaints. Anthony Albanese on Monday said the allegations had been “dealt with” through the appropriate channels. One of the complainants against the senator, Esther Montgomery, told The Australian on Tuesday that she had “no doubt” that her decision to join Labor would ultimately end in tears for the Albanese government. “Dorinda Cox is a creature of habit. She’s a bully by nature, and it’s going to be very, very interesting, the dynamics within the party,” she said. Ms Montgomery, an Indigenous elder and veteran activist, spent a “nightmare” two months employed in Senator Cox’s office and went public with her complaints last year.

 

>>23115924 TikTok fires shot in social media war, putting heat on the federal government’s crackdown - The Albanese government will come under enormous pressure to deliver on its pre-election pledges relating to social media age restrictions and the news media bargaining code, as tech companies prepare well-funded public campaigns to lobby for amendments to the laws. Video-sharing app TikTok fired its first post-election shot at the federal government last week, paying tens of thousands of dollars for four-and-a-half pages of advertising in the Nine-owned Australian Financial Review extolling the supposed educational and social benefits for children who use the social media platform. In December, the government passed legislation to ban children under 16 from accessing certain social media platforms, including TikTok, Snapchat, Instagram and Facebook, but granted an exemption for YouTube because of its perceived educational value. That decision has angered YouTube’s commercial rivals, which are preparing extensive ad campaigns in the weeks and months ahead seeking to undermine the federal government’s social media legislation, due to come into effect in December. The intense lobbying in Australia by the social media platforms, and companies Meta and Google with regards to the media bargaining code, is complicated by the political landscape in the US, where tech companies are seeking to closely align themselves with the Trump administration, which is broadly sympathetic to their cause.

 

>>23115940 US Space Forces Indo-Pacific commander highlights growing role of space in regional security at Australian Space Summit - U.S. Space Force Brig. Gen. Anthony Mastalir, USSF Indo-Pacific commander, emphasized the critical role of space capabilities in ensuring stability across the Indo-Pacific region at Australian Space Summit 2025, May 27-28. Speaking to a diverse audience of defense leaders, industry partners, and policymakers, Mastalir underscored the evolving mission of the U.S. Space Force and the depth of the U.S.-Australia military alliance during a keynote address and panel discussion. “In light of today’s challenges and the imperative for a robust, integrative response … we established U.S. Space Forces Indo-Pacific in 2022,” Mastalir said. “Our mission remains unchanged: integrated space operations to preserve a free and open Indo-Pacific.” Mastalir highlighted the recent establishment of Space Force components in South Korea and Japan, underscoring a growing forward presence designed to deter threats and enhance operational integration with allies. “Guardians in these components work side by side with our allies to integrate space capabilities into military operations and protect friendly forces from space-enabled attacks,” he explained. He also reaffirmed the indispensable role of Australia in U.S. defense strategy, “Australia is not just a strategic partner, but a true friend, and an essential pillar of deterrence here,” Mastalir said. “Our nations have forged a bond that is both enduring and meaningful.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:03 a.m. No.23252217   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 68

Australian Politics and Society - Part 26

>>23120646 Video: Tasmanian Labor leader Dean Winter tables no-confidence motion in Premier Jeremy Rockliff - Tasmanian Premier Jeremy Rockliff has warned the state will head to the polls early if Labor's no confidence motion in him is successful. Mr Rockliff's leadership hangs by a thread, with the Greens' decision about whether to support a no-confidence motion set to determine whether or not he stays in the top job. Labor leader Dean Winter declared during his budget reply speech on Tuesday that he had no confidence in Mr Rockliff. Mr Winter's position has already won the backing of three crossbenchers - independents Kristie Johnston and Craig Garland, and Jacqui Lambie Network MP Andrew Jenner. "Today, I've tabled a motion that says the house has no confidence in this premier, because he's wrecked the budget, because he's planning to sell our power companies, our ports and our public transport, and because no one can trust him after the handling of the Spirit of Tasmania fiasco," Mr Winter said. The opposition has repeatedly described last Thursday's budget, which forecast four deficits and debt reaching $10.8 billion in the 2028-29 financial year, as the worst budget in the state's history. Mr Winter threw the gauntlet down to the crossbench to support the motion. "If they really are opposed to the premier's agenda of debt, deficit and debacle as they claim, then tell the house you've lost confidence in this premier," he said. "When enough members indicate their support for my motion, I will move it. If not, they will show they're happy to go along with this agenda, all of the debt, all of the cuts, all of the privatisation." The motion needs the support of eight crossbenchers to succeed. It currently has three, but will have the required eight if the Greens vote to support it at a partyroom meeting on Wednesday.

 

>>23120665 Chaos, election looms as Premier rolled by parliament - Tasmania is in political limbo, with a lame-duck premier attempting to force an early election rather than resign - and no-one sure who will be leading the state by the weekend. The island state’s beleaguered Liberal Premier, Jeremy Rockliff, is expected to visit acting governor Christopher Shanahan on or before Thursday morning to call an early election, rather than resign due to an ongoing no-confidence motion he appears certain to lose. Despite losing the confidence of a majority of MPs for his minority government, Jeremy Rockliff on Wednesday vowed to “fight to my last breath”. For now, it appears his shaken Liberals colleagues are standing by him, resisting the urge to cut him loose or accept any invitation by Chief Justice Shanahan to change leaders. That means Labor leader Dean Winter may be called on to try to form a government - an invitation, with just 10 seats out of 35, sources suggest he is unlikely to accept. Barring any change by the key players, such a standoff would force Tasmanians to the polls for a second time within 15 months, with a state budget frozen in parliament, threatening payment of public service wages. Labor leader Dean Winter has secured the support of the Greens and three independents to oust Mr Rockliff, with grievances cited including alleged budget mismanagement, bungled ferry infrastructure projects, a privatisation agenda and the AFL stadium. Mr Winter told the House of Assembly Mr Rockliff was taking state net debt from $1 billion when he became Premier in April 2022 to almost $11 billion by 2028-29. “Jeremy Rockliff is sending Tasmania broke and his only plan to fix it is to sell Tasmanian assets that Tasmanians built together over the past 100 years,” Mr Winter said.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:04 a.m. No.23252218   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 69

Australian Politics and Society - Part 27

>>23120675 Australia spared Trump tariff letter as Ley says Albanese should secure special deal - Australia has been spared a letter from the Trump administration demanding countries cut trade barriers to US goods as the White House prepares to reinstate its “liberation day” tariffs, but has not secured a UK-style exemption to increased steel and aluminium import taxes. Trade Minister Don Farrell met his US counterpart Jamieson Greer in Paris overnight as Albanese prepares to hold his first meeting with Trump later this month, either in the US or on the sidelines of the G7 meeting of the world’s largest economies in Canada. The meeting is expected to be dominated by Trump’s trade war and US requests for its allies to boost defence spending. Albanese this week pushed back against a request from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth for Australia to boost its military spending from about 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent. The United States Trade Representative, the office primarily responsible for trade matters, sent a letter to countries asking them to provide their best offer for a trade deal by Wednesday, US time. The Trump administration confirmed the missive, first reported by Reuters. The letter suggests fresh urgency from the Trump administration as it looks to settle trade deals with partners before July 8, when the 90-day “pause” on Trump’s so-called reciprocal tariffs expires. An Australian government spokeswoman said Australia did not receive the letter because it was only sent to nations with a higher tariff rate than the baseline 10 per cent rate. “Australia is in the lowest ‘baseline’ tariff tier of 10 per cent,” she said. “As such, the US administration has confirmed Australia has not been sent a letter. Trade Minister Farrell met with his US counterpart today in Paris and pressed for the removal of unjustified tariffs imposed on Australian goods.”

 

>>23125030 ‘Video: Cowardly power grab’ says ‘heartbroken’ Premier ahead of election call - An emotional Tasmanian Premier has restated his intention to seek a snap early election, after losing a no-confidence vote in state parliament, accusing Labor of “cowardice” and a “grab for power”. The state’s House of Assembly voted 18 votes to 17 to express no confidence in Premier Jeremy Rockliff over alleged budget mismanagement, bungled ferries infrastructure and a privatisation push. The vote was tied 17 each way, with Labor Speaker Michelle O’Byrne using her casting vote to pass the motion. Ms O’Byrne said no one could expect her to vote confidence in a Liberal premier, while also warning the house would need to continue to sit long enough to pass a special supply bill to ensure public servants could be paid during any election period. Mr Rockliff restated his intention to seek an early election, after the no-confidence motion passed. “This will be an election that Tasmanians don’t want and that Tasmania cannot afford,” he told the Assembly. However, he said a snap poll was “on the heads” of Labor leader Dean Winter and the ALP. “This has been a selfish grab for power that we will fight and do our darnedest to win … This is not a fair fight; this is a cowardice act.”

 

>>23134204 Video: PM insists biosecurity is 'first priority' as beef tops agenda in upcoming US trade talks - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has vowed not to compromise biosecurity as trade negotiations over beef are set to top the agenda in crucial talks with US President Donald Trump. Trump singled out Australia's ban on US beef during a Liberation Day tariff announcement in April, claiming Australia "won't take any of our beef" due to a concern over mad cow disease. Cattle Australia disputes that claim, because a ban on US beef was lifted in 2019, provided the cattle is born, raised and slaughtered in the US. But concerns over "mixed herds" mean beef from the US rarely makes it to Australian plates. US exporters are currently unable to prove their herds don't include beef that was born in Mexico and Canada, which are still rated a biosecurity risk, then later slaughtered in the US. "We haven't been assured there's a system that allows the appropriate tracing of animals, or appropriate traceback of animals," Cattle Australia chief executive Dr Chris Parker said. A review is underway into whether that should change, which could be used as a bargaining chip for Trump to drop all tariffs against Australia.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:04 a.m. No.23252219   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 70

Australian Politics and Society - Part 28

>>23139142 ‘Dump Jeremy Rockliff to stop election disaster’, senior Tasmanian Liberals, business leaders tell party - Tasmanian Liberal MPs are under mounting pressure - from senior party figures and business leaders – to dump Premier Jeremy Rockliff to prevent an early election, as MPs blamed the AFL for the state’s political crisis. Federal Liberal frontbencher Jonathon Duniam on Friday described Mr Rockliff’s push to send Tasmanians back to the polls for a second time within 15 months as “nuts”. The state parliamentary Liberal Party is so far standing by Mr Rockliff, who is planning to request a snap election rather than resign, after the House of Assembly passed a no-confidence motion in him on Thursday. Senator Duniam, a leading party conservative, told The Australian the PLP needed to take “whatever steps necessary” to prevent the snap poll. “Unless my colleagues are 100 per cent certain that the voters of Tasmania are not going to punish them for sending them to an early election, they should be taking whatever steps are necessary,” Senator Duniam said. “Going to an election will be a bad outcome. The PLP needs to have a good, long think about this.” Some MPs share Senator Duniam’s concerns, with Liberal Party strategists warning it will lose seats and potentially government at any poll. However, most are so far standing with Mr Rockliff, believing an election within 12 months is likely anyway, and preferring to go now with Mr Rockliff as leader than later with a less popular alternative.

 

>>23144364 Video: Scott Morrison receives country's highest honour for leading Australia through COVID crisis - Scott Morrison has credited Australians for their "courage and resilience" in the face of crises, including the Black Summer bushfires and a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic, as he receives the country's highest honour for his leadership. The 30th prime minister has been appointed a Companion of the Order of Australia (AC) for his "eminent service" to the country and direction of the national COVID response, as part of the King's Birthday honours. Mr Morrison was prime minister for just over three and a half years - between 2018 and 2022 — a period in which he said, "we were hit with pretty much every crisis you can imagine". "From natural disasters to a global pandemic, once in a hundred years, and of course the threats we faced in our region, and a recession caused by that global pandemic," he said in a sit-down interview before his appointment was publicly announced. "Through all of this Australians were just incredible and the one assumption I made is that that's how they would be - their character would pull them through and that's the basis on which we built the policies that helped us to achieve that." The AC is the highest award in the King's Birthday honour list, designed to recognise achievements "in service to Australia or humanity at large". Former prime ministers are typically appointed, but the time between their service and the recognition varies. Mr Morrison's appointment - three years after he lost the prime ministership — also notes his contributions to international engagement, economic initiatives and national security, particularly through his role in securing the AUKUS agreement. The latter was named by the former prime minister as one of his proudest achievements in office, among other work he said his government undertook to strengthen Australia's sovereignty.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:06 a.m. No.23252221   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 71

Australian Politics and Society - Part 29

>>23144424 King’s Birthday honours: Scott Morrison says Labor’s weaponisation of Brittany Higgins a ‘new low mark’ - Scott Morrison has urged the ­Coalition to embrace policies that give people economic choices in life and mount the case that governments in a post-pandemic era can only “treat symptoms for so long before it starts eroding your capacity to have a strong economy”. The former Liberal prime minister and treasurer - awarded a Companion of the Order of ­Australia in the King’s Birthday honours list – said the Covid years had fundamentally changed the way Australians think about the major parties and economic security. Mr Morrison’s legacies include striking the AUKUS deal and re-engaging the Quad, his government’s management of the Covid pandemic, standing up to Chinese aggression, record mental health funding, winning the 2019 election just nine months after replacing Malcolm Turnbull, strengthening economic, military and diplomatic ties with the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Japan and Israel, and securing free-trade agreements with India and Britain. Mr Morrison’s tenure as ­Australia’s 30th prime minister from 2018-22 also featured lowlights, including the fallout from the Robodebt scandal, his government’s handling of Ms Higgins’ alleged sexual assault, China’s trade bans, the furore over his family holiday in Hawaii during the Black Summer bushfires, and Labor’s criticism over him secretly swearing himself into multiple ministries during the pandemic. “The weaponisation of natural disasters, and even what happened over the alleged events in Parliament House with Brittany Higgins, which you know now plays out in the courts, the weaponisation of these things politically by my opponents, both within the parliament and outside it, I think was a new low mark,” Mr Morrison said. “There had been the practice that in times of natural disaster, there’s strong bipartisanship, and I can’t say I enjoyed a lot of that. The weaponisation, whether it was of Covid or of bushfires or other things, when I and my team were out there … the selective attacks that were made were very disappointing, but you had to push through them.”

 

>>23144488 No regrets for Morrison on pandemic-era actions - Scott Morrison has called out blanket vaccine mandates and school closures during the pandemic, defended his creation of the national cabinet and backed big-spending measures that ensured the nation’s economy “rocketed out the other side of Covid”. The former prime minister, who does not regret his government’s call to not bank a surplus at the end of 2019, said hard decisions were made by Josh Frydenberg and Mathias Cormann that helped deliver the “biggest fall in the deficit in Australia’s history of over $100bn”. Reflecting on the pandemic fallout after receiving a Companion of the Order of Australia in the King’s Birthday honours list, Mr Morrison said he opposed blanket vaccine mandates and school closures ordered by state and territory governments. Mr Morrison, whose AC was awarded for his leadership of the national Covid-19 response alongside achievements on the global stage including his role as co-architect of the AUKUS deal, remains convinced the national cabinet model he set up was the “right vehicle”. The former Liberal leader, who had running pandemic battles with premiers including Daniel Andrews, Annastacia Palaszczuk and Mark McGowan over lockdowns and border closures, said the bottom-up, bureaucracy-laden COAG (Council of Australian Governments) forum had become a place where policy issues “went to die”. “Vaccine mandates employed unilaterally by states were not decisions of the national cabinet. Decisions to close schools were not decisions of national cabinet. In fact, on both of those, I opposed them,” Mr Morrison told The Australian.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:06 a.m. No.23252222   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 72

Australian Politics and Society - Part 30

>>23144780 Former trade minister urges Anthony Albanese not to ‘concede’ to Donald Trump on tariffs - The architect of multiple landmark free-trade agreements has urged Anthony Albanese to focus on the nation’s shared history with the US in a potential meeting with Donald Trump, declaring there was no basis on which Australia should be “conceding or negotiating” on tariffs. Former trade minister Andrew Robb, who secured free-trade deals with China, Japan and South Korea, as well as the Trans-Pacific Partnership, said the Prime Minister needed to tell Mr Trump his decision to violate the agreement between the two countries without a phone call was “unacceptable”. As Trade Minister Don Farrell advances negotiations for a free-trade agreement with the EU, Mr Robb said striking a “good deal” with Europe would counter Mr Trump’s protectionist agenda and demonstrate to the US the benefits of opening the world economy. Mr Robb, trade minister from 2013-16, said the move to slap a 10 per cent baseline tariff on Australian exports to the US and 50 per cent on steel and aluminium was unjustifiable considering the two nations’ strong alliance and wartime history. “I find it intolerable that all these things that have been imposed on us have occurred without even a phone call,” Mr Robb told The Australian. “That’s what he should be saying to the President before those open discussions. We’ve got no need to negotiate on anything, we have been giving, and given to giving.”

 

>>23145659 Video: ‘Must be called out’: PM under pressure after 9News reporter Lauren Tomasi shot with rubber bullet during LA protests - The Greens have called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to seek “urgent explanation” from Donald Trump after an Australian journalist was shot by police with a rubber bullet in Los Angeles. 9News reporter Lauren Tomasi was hit while covering street protests that have broken out in LA following the arrests of dozens of people for alleged immigration violations. The moment was captured on camera with Ms Tomasi directly hit in the leg. “You just f*ckin’ shot the reporter!” a protester yelled at the officer before asking whether she was OK. “Yeah, I’m good,” she replied. Providing an update on 9News on Monday evening, Ms Tomasi said, “I’m okay. My cameraman Jimmy and I are both safe. “This is just one of the unfortunate realities of reporting on these kinds of incidents. It has been a really volatile day on the streets of Los Angeles. There have been a lot of tempers flaring here today and certainly tonight there is a lot of anger in the City of Angels.” In a statement, Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young called on Mr Albanese to hold the US President accountable. “US authorities shooting an Australian journalist is simply shocking,” Ms Hanson-Young said in a statement. “It is completely unacceptable and must be called out.”

 

>>23152427 ‘Horrific’: Albanese condemns shooting of Nine journalist in US - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has labelled the police shooting of Nine US correspondent Lauren Tomasi as “unacceptable”, but declined to say whether he would personally raise the incident with President Donald Trump. Tomasi was reporting live from the protests in Los Angeles when an officer appeared to turn and fire a rubber bullet at her leg on Monday morning AEST. Tomasi said she is bruised but otherwise uninjured, and continued working. Addressing the National Press Club in Canberra on Tuesday afternoon, Albanese said he had seen the “horrific” footage and spoken with Tomasi. “[That was] an Australian journalist doing what journalists do at their very best … In LA, it is not unreasonable to think that she would not have been targeted with a rubber bullet,” he said. “[She was] clearly identified as media. There was no ambiguity … We don’t find it acceptable that it occurred.” Albanese said the issue had been raised with the US administration, but refused to say whether he would personally raise the issue with Trump. “I’ll leave the discussions with the president until they occur,” he said.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:07 a.m. No.23252224   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 73

Australian Politics and Society - Part 31

>>23158064 Anthony Albanese under pressure from White House on NSW mining compensation ahead of Donald Trump talks - Anthony Albanese has been asked to personally intervene in a decade-old $400m compensation claim for Australian and US citizens over a NSW government mining confiscation as part of an upcoming deal with Donald Trump on trade tariffs. As the Prime Minister prepares to go to Canada for the G7 summit and meet the US President on the sidelines of the conference, trade representatives in Washington DC are seeking a resolution to the compensation claim arising from the NSW Liberal government’s confiscation of mining leases in 2014. US trade representatives have repeatedly raised the lack of compensation for US investors as a breach of the US-Australia Free Trade Agreement and listed it as an official “investment barrier” in its annual foreign trade barriers report released in March. Before Mr Albanese’s expected face-to-face meeting with Mr Trump, US and Australian representatives of “mum and dad” shareholders have appealed to Mr Albanese and Trade Minister Don Farrell to provide compensation and smooth trade relations. In a letter sent to Mr Albanese and Senator Farrell on behalf of 50 mum-and-dad shareholders last month, NuCoal resources chairman Gordon Galt raised concerns with the Prime Minister about the need for “proper redress for affected investors”. Mr Galt, who has fought a long-running battle with the NSW government to provide compensation for investors after then-premier Barry O’Farrell axed the Doyles Creek mining exploration licence, warned Mr Albanese that the matter threatened the “nation’s reputation as a safe destination for investment”.

 

>>23158114 Video: Malcolm Turnbull’s warning for the world as Donald Trump solidifies power in the US - Former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has thrown the gloves down again, boldly warning the world that Donald Trump risks sending America into a new era of authoritarianism. Speaking on ABC News on Tuesday afternoon, Mr Turnbull cautioned Australia and its allies to prepare for a more volatile international order, urging democratic nations to become less dependent on an increasingly unpredictable United States under the billionaire commander-in-chief. Mr Turnbull expanded on a recent essay he published in Foreign Affairs, arguing that “those countries that share the values for which the United States once stood, but currently does not, should band together to preserve what worked best in the order Trump is intent on burying.” Following Mr Trump’s inauguration, Mr Turnbull has spent much of 2025 calling for strategic independence among Western democracies and a renewed commitment to multilateralism, free trade and stability. He said Mr Trump’s “erratic” leadership has undermined trust in America’s role as a global stabiliser. He also touched on the escalating situation in Los Angeles, where federal authorities have deployed marines in response to anti-ICE protests and arrests of undocumented immigrants. “You can understand Governor Newsom feeling that Trump is trying to provoke a greater crisis there,” Mr Turnbull said. “These are dangerous times in America … There are many people in America now - serious people – who are concerned that America is slipping into a realm of authoritarianism … almost of tyranny. And that should be very concerning for us.”

 

>>23163825 Battlelines drawn as Governor approves July 19 Tasmanian election - Tasmanians will go to the polls on July 19 - for the second time in 16 months – after the state’s Governor on Wednesday night ­finally agreed to the early election requested by Premier Jeremy Rockliff. The election - Tasmania’s fourth in a little over seven years – follows an extended power vacuum after Mr Rockliff last week suffered a no-confidence motion in the House of Assembly. Governor Barbara Baker, who on Tuesday night deferred a decision on Mr Rockliff’s election request, said she had ­decided there was no real alternative. “Notwithstanding the recent 2024 election, the public interest in avoiding the cost of another election and the prevailing public mood against holding an election, I have granted Premier Rockliff a dissolution,” Ms Baker said. Mr Rockliff welcomed the ­decision. “A state election has been called for July 19 - one that we’re going to fight in the name of common decency,” he said via social media. “To draw a line in the sand, as Tasmanians, and stand up for what we believe in. Not political games. But building a better Tasmania. Your support over these last few days has been nothing short of incredible. I have been truly humbled. Now let’s get on with it.” Labor leader Dean Winter said Tasmanians now had “a choice”, flagging a campaign ­attack based on Mr Rockliff’s abandoned privatisation agenda.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:07 a.m. No.23252225   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 74

Australian Politics and Society - Part 32

>>23163835 Albanese-Trump G7 meeting in limbo as Israeli cabinet sanctions trigger US rebuke - Anthony Albanese may not meet with Donald Trump next week in Canada as relations with the US administration sour. The countries' relationship is being tested by Australia's decision to sanction two Israeli cabinet members, plus a fresh American review of AUKUS following a disagreement over defence spending. While a potential in-person meeting on the sidelines of the Group of Seven leaders gathering in Alberta is still anticipated, senior sources told the ABC it was too soon to be "definitive" and that there were "lots of moving parts". The prime minister departs for North America on Friday morning for the June 15-17 summit amid expectations he will sit down with Mr Trump to discuss US trade tariffs on Australian steel and other goods, and defence cooperation. But there is also an awareness inside the Australian and US governments that Australia's decision to slap sanctions on two hard-right Israeli ministers - Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich — could trigger the "mercurial" Mr Trump's ire. The sanctions, which were mirrored by the UK, Canada, Norway and New Zealand, triggered an exchange of words on Wednesday between US Secretary of State Marco Rubio - who described them as counterproductive to peace in the region — and Mr Albanese, who dismissed the US charge as "predictable, frankly".

 

>>23174081 Labor’s Israeli sanctions ‘put Australia on the US radar’ - Increasing differences between Washington and Canberra on foreign policies, including the approach to Israel and position on defence spending, have put Australia “on the US radar” and opened up the “opportunity” for the Trump administration to trigger a review of the multibillion-dollar AUKUS deal, former government ministers say. Despite Labor confirming it had known about the Trump administration’s intention to review AUKUS for “some time”, the formal announcement came just a day after US Secretary of State Marco Rubio condemned the sanctioning of two Israeli ministers by Australia and Five Eyes partners such as Britain, saying the move did “not advance US-led efforts to achieve a ceasefire”. Defence Minister Richard Marles sought to downplay the review, to be led by vocal AUKUS critic and Under Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby, saying it was a “natural step” for US President Donald Trump to take. Former Australian ambassador to Washington Joe Hockey said Anthony Albanese’s push back against Mr Hegseth’s call for Australia to spend 3.5 per cent of its GDP on defence was part of there reason behind the review. “I think he would have seen the opportunity in the disagreement between Secretary Hegseth and Prime Minister Albanese,” he told ABC. “He would have seen that as an opportunity to have a review of AUKUS, probably initiated by himself.” Mr Hockey said there was “still strong support for AUKUS across congress and the White House”.

 

>>23175018 COMMENTARY: Anthony Albanese’s ‘doublespeak’ no substitute for straight talk on defence - "The subtext of Anthony Albanese’s speech to the National Press Club could not have been louder if he had screamed it from the podium: the biggest threat to Australia is the contagion of American ideas. It was summed up in this sentence: “Australians voted against importing conflicts and ideologies that have no basis in our national culture or character.” Importing what conflicts and ideologies? From where? The religious hatred Iran and its proxies mobilise across the Middle East and export here? The tyrannical ideologies that China and Russia want to normalise and impose on this nation and the world? No. This statement was aimed squarely at the ideas the Prime Minister says Australians rejected at the election, the ones the Coalition stands accused of smuggling in from the US: culture wars and small government. Albanese’s theme was clear: Labor saved Australia from becoming a colonial outpost of Trumpian America. Albanese knows there are rich political fields to be ploughed here and all available evidence supports him. There are good reasons Canberra should differ with Washington, but with a president as mercurial and transactional as Trump this is a highwire act. There is also a hazard in dog-whistling disdain for the US President while downplaying the real and present danger posed by China’s Xi Jinping. Observers in Washington might have noted the tone Albanese adopted when asked whether he thought China was a national security threat. “I think that our engagement with the region and the world needs to be diplomatic, needs to be mature and needs to avoid the, you know, attempts to simplify what are a complex set of relationships,” Albanese said. Here the Prime Minister was at pains to de-escalate language, refusing to endorse the word “threat” when discussing Beijing." - Chris Uhlmann - theaustralian.com.au

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:07 a.m. No.23252226   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 75

Australian Politics and Society - Part 33

>>23182429 Nationals oppose Liberals’ Hobart AFL stadium to win Tasmania seats, open to ex-JLN MPs - The Nationals - seeking to “take Tasmania by storm” at the state election – have joined the Greens in vowing to kill Hobart’s “irresponsible” Macquarie Point AFL stadium. Seeking to re-establish the party in the decentralised island state, after six years without an elected representative, the Nationals on Thursday announced they would stand candidates in three of the five multi-member electorates. The Nationals’ vow to ditch the $1bn stadium - championed by the minority Liberal government – gives anti-stadium voters in those seats an alternative to the Greens, with Labor and the Liberals standing by the project. Nationals Senate leader Brid­get McKenzie, in Tasmania to kickstart her party’s campaign, ­denied the stadium stance was disloyal to her national Coalition partner. “We are not a faction of the Australian Liberal Party,” Senator McKenzie told The Australian. She said voters in Bass, Braddon and Lyons who did not want the stadium but did not want to vote for the Greens or independents now had another, less de­stabilising option. “We are not a party of protest like the Greens, like other minor parties … we are a party of government and have a very responsible approach to the work of representation, to fiscal respon­sibility,” she said.

 

>>23182456 Amazon boosts Australian data centre investment to $20bn as Albanese visits Seattle - US global tech giant Amazon will pump $20bn into Australia over five years to expand its data centre network, cloud infrastructure and energy generation, including new investment in three solar farms across Victoria and Queensland. Amazon Web Services chief executive Matt Garman - who leads the company’s cloud, data centre and artificial intelligence business – said the funding pledge out to 2029 was the “largest investment ever announced by a global technology provider in Australia”. The $20bn AWS commitment, which incorporates prior funding pledges made by the company, includes expansions of Amazon’s data centres in Sydney and Melbourne, and investment in three new solar projects. The solar farms will be delivered by European Energy, with Amazon committing to purchase a combined capacity of more than 170MW. Amazon already has investments in eight solar and wind projects in Victoria, Queensland and NSW, which help power AWS operations including data and fulfilment centres. Mr Garman said once all 11 renewable energy projects are up-and-running, they will generate more than 1.4 million megawatt hours of emissions-friendly power annually. Mr Albanese said the Amazon investment represents “an exciting opportunity for Australia to build AI capability using secure, resilient infrastructure”. With the Albanese government positioning productivity as a top economic priority during its second term, the Prime Minister said the AWS expansion plans were “exactly the kind of economic investment in our nation that we want to see, and creates opportunities for continued innovation and growth”.

 

>>23186845 Albanese faces Labor dissent over Amazon’s access to government contracts - Anthony Albanese is facing internal dissent over Amazon’s access to lucrative public contracts, with NSW Labor senator Tony Sheldon calling for the tech giant to be barred from receiving such work, while three ministers are among at least 17 government MPs who have accused the company of exploiting its workers. With the Prime Minister on Saturday (Sunday AEST) visiting the Seattle headquarters of the company’s cloud computing subsidiary Amazon Web Services, fellow NSW Right senator Deb O’Neill backed using government procuring power to hold the company accountable. Senator O’Neill, who enjoys the backing of the Shop, Distributive and Allied Employees Association (SDA) - a longstanding critic of Amazon’s approach to workplace practices – has similarly implored the government to use its buying power to “hold Amazon to account”. Late last year, she criticised the multinational for being “anti-worker and fiercely anti-union”, while claiming it had engaged in “countless examples of calculated exploitation” of its workforce. She has accused the company of acting as a “champion tax dodger” and argued that lucrative government contracts had helped “power the Amazon behemoth and keep its practices going.” In response to questions about those remarks, Senator O’Neill said: “I stand by my previous comments.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:08 a.m. No.23252228   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 76

Australian Politics and Society - Part 34

>>23186853 USS America, USS San Diego, USS Rushmore arrive in Sydney with 31st Marines - The US Navy amphibious assault ship USS America has arrived in Sydney during a routine stop for troops from the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit. The flagship of the America Strike Group brings more than 2,500 sailors and marines to Sydney under a US scheduled port visit from 14 June. The ship brings significant capabilities to the region, including a detachment of Marine Fighter Attack Squadron (VMFA) 242, equipped with the advanced F-35B Lightning II aircraft. “Sydney’s warm welcome has been exceptional,” according to USS America Commanding Officer Captain Ethan Rule. “This port visit provides a valuable opportunity to strengthen the bonds between our nations, experience Australia’s unique culture, and reinforce our shared values.” Royal Australian Navy Liaison Officer, LCDR Craig Hamilton is currently serving aboard USS America with the mission of fostering seamless cooperation and interoperability between the two navies. He will host Australian military and government officials for a tour of the ship, highlighting its capabilities and the close partnership between the US and Australia. “The US-Australia alliance is a cornerstone of peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific,” said Erika Olson, chargé d’affaires, US mission to Australia. “The arrival of America, USS San Diego and USS Rushmore marks the first time that the three-ship America Strike Group are together in Sydney. We are excited to have sailors and marines here, and warmly welcome them to Sydney.” America, San Diego, and Rushmore are part of the America Strike group, which is capable of responding to a range of military operations, including combat operations and humanitarian assistance and disaster response.

 

>>23186860 USS America docks in Sydney after 30 days at sea - "If you seem to be hearing a lot of American accents in Sydney this week, you’re not hallucinating. At noon on Saturday, the amphibious assault ship USS America steamed into Sydney Harbour with its crew of around 2500 American sailors and marines ready for a bit of shore leave after a 30-day cruise from their home base in Japan. As The Sunday Telegraph’s in-house American, I was offered the chance to chopper out to the ship aboard a Seahawk helicopter with a small delegation to meet the crew and check out life aboard the ship. After a quick but thorough safety briefing and the distribution of flotation devices and helmets (“cranials”, in navy-speak), our delegation was whisked via Seahawk helicopter to the ship as it steamed its way towards the Heads. Aboard, an atmosphere of tightly controlled chaos reigned as the crew readied the America for arrival at Garden Island, nimbly navigating the ship’s disorienting network of gangways, ramps, and stairs. Tilt-wing Ospreys sat arrayed towards the ship’s bow, further astern were a number of the Pentagon’s prized F35B fighter jets. Able to land vertically like a helicopter on the America’s relatively short flight deck, and equipped with impossibly advanced computer systems, one aviator would be heard to remark that there was “magic in those machines”. Elsewhere, excited sailors went about the business of bringing the ship in safely while also revealing their plans for their leave in Australia - almost all of them as first-time visitors." - James Morrow - dailytelegraph.com.au

 

>>23197979 Ghost Bat missile trial looms amid growing foreign interest - Boeing Australia’s MQ-28A Ghost Bat drone will be trialled as an armed platform later this year in a major leap forward for the program, as the government ramps up efforts to acquire lethal uncrewed aircraft. The developmental drone will test-fire an air-to-air missile after a successful trial last week in which two of the aircraft were operated simultaneously from an RAAF jet. The government, which has poured $1bn of taxpayers’ funds into the aircraft, had deferred plans to arm the Ghost Bat, intending to develop it initially for surveillance and electronic warfare missions. But there is growing confidence in the drone after the latest test at South Australia’s top-secret Woomera range, prompting the fast-tracking of the missile trial. “There will be an armed trial later this year,” Defence Industry Minister Pat Conroy said. “Boeing is working on plans that will involve an air-to-air weapons test.” Mr Conroy declined to say when the Ghost Bat was expected to enter service but said the program was running four months ahead of schedule and indicated it was in line for further funding when its budget was expended by the end of the year. He said the drone was one of the top five capabilities the government was marketing to foreign militaries, and was already attracting strong interest from potential overseas buyers.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:09 a.m. No.23252229   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 77

Australian Politics and Society - Part 35

>>23197936 Australia races to lock in new meeting with Trump to avoid second snub - Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, is leading a diplomatic push to lock in a meeting for Prime Minister Anthony Albanese with US President Donald Trump in Europe next week, which would force Albanese to depart Australia again just days after returning from his failed attempt to meet Trump in Canada. The president is scheduled to be at the NATO summit beginning June 24 in The Hague, and a meeting would give the prime minister a chance to press Australia’s case with the US on the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, defence spending and tariffs. But the risk that Trump could cancel to deal with escalating conflict in the Middle East presents a dilemma for Albanese, who has tried to brush off the blow of Trump cancelling their meeting at the G7 for the same reason. A day after saying he expected Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles would attend the NATO summit, Albanese changed his mind and said he could go. “Yes, that’s being considered,” he told reporters travelling with him at the G7 summit in Canada. Sources familiar with Australia’s diplomatic approach, who weren’t authorised to speak publicly, said Rudd was leading work on a potential meeting and that Albanese was unlikely to go to NATO unless time with Trump was certain. While Rudd is leading the push to secure the meeting, Albanese has also sought advice from Greg Norman about how to build a connection with Trump. The strategy mirrors the playbook of Malcolm Turnbull, who also turned to the professional golfer to get in touch with Trump in 2016.

 

>>23203238 Anthony Albanese seeks window for Trump sit-down - Anthony Albanese has left the door open for a last-minute dash to The Hague next week as he continues to seek his first face-to-face meeting with Donald Trump at the NATO leaders’ summit after the US President ditched their G7 talks. The Prime Minister was blindsided on Tuesday when the President cancelled their meeting and departed the G7 early following an escalation of the Israel-Iran war, forcing Mr Albanese to make his long-awaited pitch on the need for the US to lift its tariffs on Australian products to Mr Trump’s economic officials instead. After sitting down with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, National Economic Council director Kevin Hassett, and US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday (AEST), Mr Albanese revealed he had not heard from Mr Trump directly since the cancellation of their meeting, despite other leaders such as Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum having received a call from the President. Mr Albanese - who is under pressure from the Coalition for being unable to progress his relationship with Mr Trump and secure wins on tariff exemptions and the long-term ­future of the $368bn AUKUS deal – said he had had discussions with a range of people in recent days including NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte. The Australian understands that several meeting scenarios are being explored and that Mr Albanese would not attend the NATO summit if there was no chance of a meeting. Should Mr Albanese attend NATO, the Labor leader would be exposed to the debate on what countries should be spending on defence, relative to GDP, with Australia having resisted calls from the US so far to lift spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP.

 

>>23212707 UK makes plans to welcome Albanese to London - The British government is making plans to welcome Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to London on a visit that could come as soon as next week if he attends Tuesday’s NATO summit in the Netherlands. The behind-the-scenes work to prepare for Albanese is the strongest sign yet that he will attend next week’s summit, which could provide a chance to make up for his failed attempt to meet US President Donald Trump in Canada. Sources familiar with the preparations, who were not authorised to speak publicly, said Albanese had not yet decided whether to attend the NATO event in The Hague in part because he was wary of Trump cancelling again. The prime minister’s office and the British High Commission to Australia did not respond to a request for comment, but by Friday government sources believed Defence Minister Richard Marles was more likely to attend the NATO summit in Albanese’s stead. Trump departed the G7 summit in Canada early to deal with the crisis in the Middle East, meaning Albanese’s first face-to-face meeting with the president was cancelled. Australia’s ambassador to the US, Kevin Rudd, is leading a diplomatic push to lock in a meeting for Albanese with Trump in Europe next week as the prime minister ponders attending the NATO event.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:09 a.m. No.23252230   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 78

Australian Politics and Society - Part 36

>>23212728 Rudd works overtime to secure Albanese an audience with Trump - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has decided against attending next week’s NATO summit in the Netherlands, dashing the slim possibility of a first face-to-face meeting with Donald Trump. Albanese’s attendance at the summit was probably 50-50 at best, but after being stood up by Trump at the G7 summit in Canada this week, the Prime Minister is facing scrutiny over whether Australia is “off” with the leader of our biggest ally. The snap 30-day review of the AUKUS nuclear-powered submarine plan led by Pentagon official Elbridge Colby, an AUKUS sceptic; demands for Australia to lift defence spending; and a sense other countries have leaped ahead of Canberra to secure tariff concessions from Trump is also fuelling concerns. A government source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said Albanese had been contemplating going to NATO well before his Trump meeting fell over, rejecting the idea it emerged as a last-minute fallback. The sentiment was that with no guarantee Trump would go anyway, there are better places to meet and planning is underway for such an outcome. Late on Thursday, Foreign Minister Penny Wong spoke to her US counterpart, Secretary of State Marco Rubio. While the Middle East was the main topic, Rubio is the person the government needs to work on to get a meeting in Trump’s diary with Albanese, given his dual hats as both top diplomat and national security adviser. However there are rumours Rudd is struggling to make inroads with the White House, with loyalists such as Stephen Miller, who is the president’s deputy chief of staff, nursing a long memory over Rudd’s past take-downs of Trump.

 

>>23212786 High Court challenge: Ben Roberts-Smith wants ex-lover to give evidence about secret recording - Ben Roberts-Smith has asked the High Court to allow a new trial in his failed defamation case that would permit his former mistress to give evidence about her explosive secretly recorded conversation with Nine reporter Nick McKenzie. In an application to the court for special leave to appeal, Roberts-Smith argues that a new trial is required because cogent evidence from the woman about the conversation - in which the journalist claimed he had been “actively briefed” about Nine’s legal strategy – was concealed by the Nine newspapers. The former SAS soldier argues he was denied the presumption of innocence in the defamation trial and wrongly branded a serial war criminal, “a criminal condemnation of the most ruinous kind”. The High Court challenge is Roberts-Smith’s last chance of overturning the landmark finding by Judge Anthony Besanko that, on the balance of probabilities, the former SAS soldier was complicit in the murder of unarmed detainees in Afghanistan. The High Court has not yet agreed to accept the appeal, and may not announce a decision for several weeks. Last month the Full Court of the Federal Court upheld Justice Besanko’s verdict in favour of the Nine newspapers, and also rejected a claim by Roberts-Smith that he had been the victim of a miscarriage of justice after the release of a tape in which McKenzie claimed to have access to the former SAS soldier’s legal strategy.

 

>>23230188 Chalmers to push tariffs case on Trump team, still no meeting for Albanese - Treasurer Jim Chalmers will attempt to ward off tariffs and massive taxes on Australian superannuation funds investing in the US when he speaks to his American counterpart on Wednesday as the prime minister defends his absence from a key NATO meeting. Anthony Albanese has sent Defence Minister Richard Marles to the NATO summit in the Netherlands this week, where Trump had reportedly hoped to meet with the prime minister and other Asia-Pacific leaders. The prime minister has not met Trump face to face more than five months into the US leader’s second presidency, spurring demands from Opposition Leader Sussan Ley that Albanese attend the NATO gathering to make up for his cancelled meeting with Trump at the G7 in Canada. “Now is the time for Australia to stand with the United States, our allies and like-minded countries,” Ley said. “The prime minister should be taking every opportunity to do so.” But Albanese said other world leaders, including the president of South Korea and prime minister of Japan, were not at NATO despite reports Trump hoped to meet with them as a bloc and suggested his critics were being hypocritical. “I’ve been to the United States on five separate occasions … as prime minister,” Albanese said on Sky News on Tuesday. “And I do note that the same people who constantly say I should do more international travel, every time I do, are critical of it as well.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:09 a.m. No.23252231   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 79

Australian Politics and Society - Part 37

>>23233237 Beyond Beyond Meat: Lab Grown Meat Has Now Arrived For Sale In 3 Countries - Australia just gave lab-grown meat the official thumbs-up, approving the sale of cultivated Japanese quail and joining the elite global club of… three. That’s right - only Singapore, the U.S., and now Australia are on board with selling meat that’s never had feathers, feet, or a heartbeat, Bloomberg wrote last week. Sydney-based startup Vow is behind the venture and says it’ll start serving up foie gras, parfait, and other fancy dishes made from quail cells in select restaurants within weeks. This follows a long-overdue tweak to the country's food standards code, years in the making. The science behind it? Cultivating animal cells in vats instead of raising entire animals, allegedly to save the planet and spare some lives. Noble goals, sure. But the cultivated meat industry hasn’t exactly been thriving. Funding is drying up, scaling remains a headache, and the political pushback - especially in the U.S. - has turned into a sideshow. “While other markets face regulatory uncertainty, Australia is embracing innovation and consumers are ready to try something new and delicious,” Vow CEO George Peppou said, clearly feeling good about being the new kid on the bioreactor block. Vow’s lab-grown quail will show up under its Forged brand at places like NEL in Sydney and Bottarga in Melbourne.

 

>>23234836 PM cannot say when he’ll meet Donald Trump - Anthony Albanese says his decision to not attend this week’s NATO summit in The Hague, which may have included a meeting with Donald Trump, was driven by other Indo-Pacific leaders also opting to miss the event. Defence Minister and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles will represent Australia at the summit and, while he refused to speculate whether he might break the ice by having an audience with the US president, government sources said it was highly unlikely. With Trump using the summit to pressure the 32 European members to lift their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP, the US wants Australia to lift its spending from the current rate of 2 per cent of GDP to 3.5 per cent “as soon as possible”. Marles, if he meets Trump, is expected to echo the arguments Albanese made last week in Canada that Australia was pulling its weight because of the additional in-kind support provided to US forces operating out of Australian bases and ports. Asked by Sky News on Tuesday when he might meet Trump, to whom he has only ever spoken by phone, Albanese was unsure. “We have agreed that we will have a meeting and that will take place at a time that’s convenient for both of us. That will be a good thing,” he said. Albanese is hoping to meet Trump in September when he travels to New York for the United Nations General Assembly. After Trump cancelled last week’s meeting, Albanese secured a meeting with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trump’s principal economic adviser Kevin Hassett.

 

>>23234844 Anthony Albanese faces date with Xi before Trump as Marles NATO meeting hopes fade - Anthony Albanese could meet Xi Jinping for a fourth time before getting his first face-to-face talks with Donald Trump, amid preparations for a prime ministerial visit to Beijing around the middle of July. While the government is scrambling to secure a meeting between the US President and Mr Albanese in Washington in the coming weeks, plans for the Beijing trip are well advanced and the Prime Minister could head to China first. Meanwhile, world leaders have converged on The Hague for the NATO summit, with the NATO “family photo” mirroring the current gulf between the US and Australia on everything from defence spending to Middle East policy. Hopes of a meeting between Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles and the US President faded after Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba cancelled plans to attend, scuttling a scheduled session with Mr Trump and NATO’s Indo-Pacific partners. Multiple sources familiar with preparations for Mr Albanese’s China visit for the nations’ annual leaders’ talks were still waiting on final confirmation that the Prime Minister would proceed with the mid-July trip, despite the program having been largely finalised. The Prime Minister’s office declined to provide any details, while senior government sources said securing the Trump meeting was the priority. If those efforts failed and Mr Albanese headed to Beijing before Washington, it would underscore the current difficulties in the Australia-US relationship and potentially complicate his efforts to forge a personal relationship with Mr Trump, who is more hawkish on China than the Prime Minister.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:10 a.m. No.23252232   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 80

Australian Politics and Society - Part 38

>>23234869 Chalmers urges Bessent to reconsider ‘revenge tax’ on super funds - Treasurer Jim Chalmers has urged his US counterpart Scott Bessent to reconsider a controversial proposal that would raise taxes on super funds and companies investing in the US, as he pushed back on calls to increase Australia’s defence spending. Institutional investors are alarmed by section 899 of the Trump administration’s so-called “big beautiful bill”. The proposed law would give the administration scope to use “revenge taxes” on foreign countries that it deemed treated American firms unfairly, such as through digital services taxes. Australia could be in the firing line because of its news media bargaining incentive, which forces US tech giants to pay for local news shared on their platforms, and its adoption of the OECD’s global minimum corporate tax rate of 15 per cent. While some Australian companies are hit with a 30 per cent withholding tax on income sourced from the US, section 899 would see this jump another 5 percentage points for each year unfair duties are imposed by another country for up to four years. The bill would also remove the tax exemptions enjoyed by sovereign wealth funds and pension funds. That has alarmed players in the $4.2 trillion superannuation industry, which have almost $400 billion invested in the US, and generally do not pay capital gains tax from these investments. Chalmers said he had a productive discussion with Bessent on Wednesday morning, where he raised Australian investors’ concerns about section 899.

 

>>23239557 Video: ‘Daddy’ Trump takes centre stage as NATO bows to his demands - President Trump, the “daddy”, as Mark Rutte, NATO’s secretary-general, now refers to him, awoke on Wednesday after a night in the Huis ten Bosch palace, nestled in a forest on the edge of The Hague, in an “excellent mood”. For the diplomats, who had tailored the entirety of the NATO summit to Trump’s limited attention span and the need to avoid unscripted outbursts, it was a good sign for the day ahead. In a press conference ahead of a two and half hour meeting of the North Atlantic Council, the principal political decision-making body of NATO, the US president compared Iran and Israel to “two kids in a school yard”. In a long, rambling defence of his strikes against Iran, Trump boasted that he had stopped the longstanding conflict between Israel and Iran. “They’re not going to be fighting each other. They’ve had it. They’ve had a big fight, like two kids in a schoolyard. You know? They fight like hell,” he said. Interrupting him, Rutte said: “Daddy sometimes has to use strong language.” The comment was a reference to Trump’s outburst that the two countries “don’t know what the f*ck they’re doing” on Tuesday. In a press conference afterwards, Rutte brushed off a suggestion that his gushing praise of “daddy” might be seen as weak, adding that his remarks were a “question of taste”. “He’s a good friend,” he said of Trump. “Doesn’t he deserve some praise?”

 

>>23239568 Anthony Albanese looking at spending more on missiles and drones after pressure from Donald Trump - Anthony Albanese, Richard Marles and Jim Chalmers are actively considering increasing defence spending on missiles, drones, frigates and nuclear submarine facilities but will not bow to pressure from Donald Trump to lift Australia’s defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. As the US President flew into the Netherlands for a royal reception amid rising hopes that his ­historic ceasefire deal between Israel and Iran would hold, Mr Trump was on the verge of another major foreign policy coup with NATO members set to increase defence spending to a total 5 per cent of GDP. The pledge - a response to ­repeated demands from the White House that Europe pay more for its own security – was celebrated by Mr Trump after he leaked a ­private text message sent to him by NATO secretary-general Mark Rutte, which lauded him for striking Iran’s nuclear facilities and his success in pushing allies to spend more on defence. The Albanese government, which is expected to announce spending boosts in coming months for the Henderson consolidation project and SEA3000 frigates program, has authorised major purchases over the past 12 months for US ammunition, rockets and guided weapons. As the US and key allies including Britain and Japan ramp up ­defence spending, senior government sources made clear they were exploring ­increased funding for specific ­defence capabilities and projects, which would lift overall defence spending levels. They also believe that the strategic advantage the US would gain from accessing Australian naval bases from 2027 was another major positive in the US-Australia defence relationship.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:10 a.m. No.23252233   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 81

Australian Politics and Society - Part 39

>>23248416 Doing enough: Anthony Albanese leaps to his own defence - Anthony Albanese has hit back at a fresh claim by the Trump ­administration that his government is not investing enough in defence, declaring the budget Labor took to the May election “received the overwhelming ­support” of Australians as he ­talked up spending on health, wages and paid parental leave. The Prime Minister would not say whether he feared Australia would face extra tariffs from the US if he did not increase spending on defence, after the US President threatened to double tariffs on imports from Spain for refusing to join other NATO nations in agreeing to lift yearly defence ­investment to 5 per cent of GDP. “I’m not going to comment on things between Spain and the United States. What my job is (is) to look after Australia’s national interests,” Mr Albanese said. After White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt on Friday (AEST) urged Asia-Pacific ­allies to increase ­defence spending in line with NATO nations, the Prime Minister said “we have lifted our spending”. When asked whether he would stick to limiting the planned increase in defence spending to 2.3 per cent so he could prioritise investment in programs such as Medicare and the NDIS, Mr Albanese said he would ensure Australia had “the capability that we need”. He said that, “in addition” to increasing spending on defence, the government was investing in paid parental leave and backing higher wages and superannuation payments.

 

>>23248432 Anthony Albanese catches diplomatic Spanish flu with defiance against Donald Trump on defence spending - "If Anthony Albanese is trying to get noticed in Washington, he is going the right way about it. But not for the right reasons. In leveraging his election victory and unprecedented domestic political capital to openly defy Donald Trump, the prime minister risks putting at stake something far greater. Suggestions that the US/Australia alliance is in peril might appear to be slightly hysterical. But this week has produced now a trifecta of further annoyances, including the delayed support for the US strikes on Iran and the admission it sought legal advice over it. And now a rebuff of Trump’s defence spending demands. That is not to say that elements of the alliance aren’t potentially at risk. And Albanese’s posturing suggests one of three things: he is either unaware of this, disbelieves it or isn’t bothered by it. The Prime Minister, emboldened and supported by a caucus moulded from his own liking, is trying to set the terms of the engagement with the US President with defence spending having become the crucible that now carries the relationship. But his attempt to project strength by appearing to poke Trump in the eye, is not without risk considering we are now midway through the 30 day Pentagon review of the AUKUS arrangements. Defiance of Trump might be more acceptable in Washington if Albanese was equally strident with Beijing." - Simon Benson - theaustralian.com.au

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:10 a.m. No.23252236   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 82

Australian Politics and Society - Part 40

>>23248447 Reprieve for Australian super funds as US dumps 'revenge tax' - Australians investing in the United States will be spared from a tax of up to 15 per cent that the Trump administration was threatening to impose as "revenge" on countries that tax its tech giants. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he would ask that the tax be taken out of Mr Trump's "big, beautiful bill" after he secured an exemption from multinational tax rules. Treasurer Jim Chalmers, who had lobbied Mr Bessent about the tax earlier this week, said the decision was "a really welcome one for Australians". "I would like to thank the treasury secretary again for his time this week, where I was able to represent and raise those concerns with him directly," he said. "In that meeting, he said he was progressing what he could to try and resolve these issues and we're really pleased to see some of that progress." Government sources say Australia was not the main target of the tax, which was motivated chiefly by grievances with Europe resolved in G7 talks. But the legislation, which targeted countries with "discriminatory" policies and specifically taxes on "digital services", was likely to capture Australia's proposed tax on social media platforms, which is to apply to platforms that fail to pay for news. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer complained about that policy in a G7 meeting with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese last week. The 15 per cent "revenge" tax would have applied to any Australian investors in the United States, with major implications for Australian super funds.

 

>>23248467 Nearly one-third of Tuvalu residents apply for Australian climate change visa program - Nearly a third of Tuvalu's citizens are seeking a landmark climate visa to live in Australia, as rising seas threaten the Pacific nation's palm-fringed shores. Australia is offering visas to 280 Tuvalu citizens each year under a climate migration deal Canberra has billed as "the first agreement of its kind anywhere in the world". More than 3,000 Tuvaluans have already entered a ballot for the first batch of visas, according to official figures on the Australian programme, almost a full third of the nation's population, according to official figures seen by AFP news agency. One of the most climate-threatened corners of the planet, scientists fear Tuvalu will be uninhabitable within the next 80 years. Two of the archipelago's nine coral atolls have already largely disappeared under the waves. "Australia recognises the devastating impact climate change is having on the livelihoods, security, and wellbeing of climate vulnerable countries and people, particularly in the Pacific region," Australia's foreign affairs department told AFP. Australia and Tuvalu inked the groundbreaking Falepili Union in 2024, part of Canberra's efforts to blunt China's expanding reach in the region. Under that pact, Australia opened a new visa category specially set aside for adult citizens of Tuvalu.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:11 a.m. No.23252237   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 83

Virginia Roberts Giuffre - Life and Legacy - Part 1

>>22959474 ‘Heroic, fierce warrior’:Family’s tribute to Virginia Giuffre- Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse, has died by suicide. “It is with utterly broken hearts that we announce that Virginia passed away last night at her farm in Western Australia,” her family said in a statement provided to The Australian. On Saturday in Perth, West Australian police confirmed the death. “About 9.50pm Friday 25 April 2025, emergency services received a report a woman had been located unresponsive at a residence in Neergabby,” police media said. “Police and St John WA attended and provided emergency first-aid. Sadly, the 41-year-old woman was declared deceased at the scene. The death is being investigated by Major Crime detectives; early indication is the death is not suspicious.” The family statement said Ms Giuffre had “lost her life to suicide, after being a lifelong victim of sexual abuse and sex trafficking. Virginia was a fierce warrior in the fight against sexual abuse and sex trafficking. She was the light that lifted so many survivors. Despite all the adversity she faced in her life, she shone so bright. She will be missed beyond measure.” Ms Giuffre is acknowledged as the woman who undid Epstein and his racket in Nigel Crawthorne’s 2022 book, Virginia Giuffre: the extraordinary life story of the masseuse who pursued and ended the sex crimes of Ghislane Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein.

 

>>22959477 Q Post #4923 - https://twitter.com/VRSVirginia/status/1319071346282778624 - Dearest Virginia - We stand with you. Now and always. Find peace through prayer. Never give up the good fight. God bless you. Q - https://qanon.pub/#4923 - https://qanon.pub/#4568

 

>>22959480 Virginia Giuffre Tweet: (December 2019) I am making it publicy known that in no way, shape or form am I sucidal. I have made this known to my therapist and GP- If something happens to me- in the sake of my family do not let this go away and help me to protect them. Too many evil people want to see me quiteted - https://archive.is/20250426022544/https://x.com/VRSVirginia/status/1204620018035462144 - https://x.com/Venau/status/1915951801288863907

 

>>22959516 Video: Virginia Giuffre, accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, dies by suicide - Virginia Giuffre, the American-Australian woman who accused paedophile Jeffrey Epstein of trafficking her, has died by suicide, her family confirmed. Ms Giuffre was found unresponsive in the Western Australian farming area of Neergabby, about one-hour north of Perth, where she had been living for the past several years. The family announced "with utterly broken hearts" that Ms Giuffre died on Thursday. - Sky News Australia

 

>>22959520 Video: Virginia Giuffre, prominent accuser of Jeffrey Epstein dies aged 41 - Virginia Giuffre, a prominent accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, has died aged 41. - ABC News Australia

 

>>22959524 Video: Virginia Giuffre, one of Jeffrey Epstein's most prominent abuse survivors, dies by suicide - Virginia Giuffre, one of the most prominent survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, has died by suicide, her family said Friday. Giuffre, 41, was one of the earliest and loudest voices calling for criminal charges against Epstein and his enablers. Other Epstein abuse survivors later credited her with giving them the courage to speak out. NBC News' Stephanie Gosk reports. - NBC News

 

>>22959530 Video: Virginia Giuffre, accuser of Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew, dies at 41 - Virginia Giuffre, who accused Britain's Prince Andrew and other influential men of sexually exploiting her as a teenager trafficked by financier Jeffrey Epstein, has died. She was 41. - ABC7 USA

 

>>22959533 Video: Woman who accused Britain's Prince Andrew in Epstein sex trafficking scandal has died - Woman who accused Britain's Prince Andrew in Epstein sex trafficking scandal has died - WPBF 25 News USA

 

>>22959539 Video: Epstein and Prince Andrew Accuser Virginia Giuffre Dies At 41 - Virginia Giuffre the woman who accused Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew of sex crimes has died, aged 41. Her family has issued a statement, confirming she died by suicide at her farm near Perth overnight. They're remembering her as a fierce warrior in the fight against sex trafficking, and a champion for survivors. - 10 News First Australia

 

>>22959543 Video: Virginia Giuffre, who accused Britain's Prince Andrew in Epstein sex trafficking scandal, has died - Giuffre died of suicide at her home in western Australia, according to her publicist. - KTVN 2 News Nevada

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:13 a.m. No.23252239   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 84

Virginia Roberts Giuffre - Life and Legacy - Part 2

>>22959549 Video: Virginia Giuffre, Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein accuser, dies - Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse, has died by suicide aged 41, her family has said. Ms Giuffre was one of the most outspoken accusers of convicted sex offenders Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, his former girlfriend. She alleged they trafficked her to the Duke of York when she was 17, which Prince Andrew has strenuously denied. Relatives said in a statement on Friday that she had been a "fierce warrior in the fight against sexual abuse", and that the "toll of abuse… became unbearable". - BBC News

 

>>22959575 Video: Virginia Giuffre, prominent survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, dies by suicide - Virginia Giuffre, an outspoken survivor of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse, has died by suicide, her family has reported. Giuffre was one of the first people to call for criminal charges against Epstein. Giuffre recounted how she was groomed by Ghislaine Maxwell to be sexually abused by Epstein. She once said Epstein passed her around “like a platter of fruit” to other men when she was a teenager. She also accused Epstein of trafficking her to Prince Andrew when she was 17, which the prince has denied. According to interviews and depositions, Giuffre said she was recruited to the sex ring in 2000 by Maxwell while working as a locker room attendant in Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago. She was 41 when she died at her farm in Neergabby, Australia. If you are based in the U.S. and you or someone you know needs mental health assistance right now, call the National Suicide Prevention Helpline at 1-800-273-TALK (8255). This is a free, confidential crisis hotline available 24 hours a day, seven days a week. If you are in another country, you can go to www.befrienders.org to find a helpline near you. If you are experiencing feelings of distress, or are struggling to cope, you can also speak to the Samaritans, in confidence, on 116 123 (UK and ROI), email jo@samaritans.org, or visit the Samaritans website to find details of your nearest branch. - The Independent UK

 

>>22959582 Video: Jeffrey Epstein and Prince Andrew's accuser, Virginia Giuffre, dies - Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein of sexual abuse, has died aged 41. Ms Giuffre's family released a statement confirming her death at her property in rural Western Australia. - ABC News Australia

 

>>22959589 Video: Virginia Giuffre dies aged 41 - Giuffre’s family issue statement confirming she killed herself at her farm in Western Australia. - news.com.au

 

>>22959594 Video: Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault, has died, her family says - Virginia Giuffre, who accused Prince Andrew of sexual assault, has died aged 41. In a statement to Sky's US partner network NBC News on Friday, her family said she took her own life in the Perth suburb of Neergabby, Australia, where she had been living for several years. Anyone feeling emotionally distressed or suicidal can call Samaritans for help on 116 123 or email jo@samaritans.org in the UK. In the US, call the Samaritans branch in your area or 1 (800) 273-TALK. - Sky News UK

 

>>22959601 Video: Virginia Giuffre dead: Prince Andrew accuser commits suicide after 'toll of abuse' became too heavy - 'Police have said there is nothing at this time to indicate anything suspicious.' Seven News Perth Reporter, James Carmody, discusses the death of 41-year-old Virginia Giuffre, who committed suicide after 'the toll of abuse' became too heavy. - GBNews UK

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:13 a.m. No.23252240   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 85

Virginia Roberts Giuffre - Life and Legacy - Part 3

>>23024217 Video: Remembering Virginia Giuffre: The woman who helped bring down Jeffrey Epstein - Virginia Giuffre's life was never easy. She had overcome extraordinary tragedy - sexual abuse as a child, homelessness and multiple sex-trafficking rings - to become a powerful advocate for sex abuse survivors around the world. To her lawyer and friend Sigrid McCawley, she was lion-hearted. "I think Virginia's legacy is something that we haven't seen before in our history," McCawley told 60 Minutes reporter Tara Brown. "She has left us with a feeling that irrespective of whether you're a president, a politician, a billionaire, or a prince, that you can be held accountable. You are not above the law." Giuffre's loss will be felt keenly by the survivors of sexual abuse she had always supported. And for those who knew and loved her, there is now an aching hole. "I used to say that we had broken through the lawyer-client line because she would sign her emails, 'I love you Siggy'," McCawley said. "She was just a dear person in my life. And I think that the world will not be the same without her. It just won't be." - 60 Minutes Australia

 

>>23080024 Virginia Giuffre: Jeffrey Epstein survivor farewelled in private in Perth - Virginia Giuffre - a high-profile survivor of billionaire paedophile Jeffrey Epstein who alleged she was sex trafficked to Prince Andrew - has been farewelled by her family in Perth. Ms Giuffre, 41, is believed to have taken her own life at her farm in Neergabby, about 80km north of Perth, last month. The West Australian understands Ms Giuffre was cremated in recent days at Pinnaroo Valley Memorial Park in Padbury. Ms Giuffre’s death attracted worldwide headlines, but it is understood she was farewelled in private, with no funeral being publicly advertised. WA Police confirmed at the weekend that officers have concluded her death is not being treated as suspicious. Major crime detectives are in the process of preparing a report to give to the coroner. Police were called to Ms Giuffre’s property about 9.50pm on April 25 after she was found unresponsive. There was nothing that could be done to save her, and she was declared dead at the scene. Her death came less than a month after she posted to social media that she had just “four days to live” after a crash with a school bus near her home, which police later dismissed as a minor incident. Ms Giuffre shot to prominence in 2015 after filing a lawsuit in a New York court against Epstein’s longtime companion and confidante, Ghislaine Maxwell, alleging the pair kept her as a “sex slave” for the rich and powerful. She said she was recruited by Maxwell when she was 16 or 17 and working at Mar-a-Lago, Donald Trump’s club in Palm Beach. Ms Giuffre told the BBC in 2019 she was “passed around like a platter of fruit” to Epstein’s friends, flown around the world on private jets. Prince Andrew was among those powerful friends, and she claimed she was forced to have sex with him when she was 17. He strongly denies the allegations. A now-infamous photograph shows him arm-in-arm with Ms Giuffre yet in a television interview with the BBC, he said he had no memory of meeting her. When she died, Ms Giuffre was facing a charge of breaching a family violence restraining order taken out by her estranged husband, Robert Giuffre. The charge was discontinued earlier this month, with a court told the allegation related to claims she sent Mr Giuffre several text messages. The former couple moved to Perth from Cairns in 2020, buying a $1.9m six-bedroom, four-bathroom ocean-front property in Ocean Reef with her husband, Robert. Ms Giuffre left behind three children - Christian, Noah and Emily. Her family said holding her newborn daughter had inspired her to “fight back against those who had abused her and so many others”. “She was heroic and will always be remembered for her incredible courage and loving spirit,” they said. “In the end, the toll of abuse is so heavy that it became unbearable for Virginia to handle its weight.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:14 a.m. No.23252241   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 86

Julian Assange - Post-Plea Deal Freedom and Activism - Part 1

>>22959621 WikiLeaks Tweet: "Now Julian is free, we have all come to Rome to express our family’s gratitude for the Pope’s support during Julian’s persecution. Our children and I had the honor of meeting Pope Francis in June 2023 to discuss how to free Julian from Belmarsh prison. Francis wrote to Julian in prison and even proposed to grant him asylum at the Vatican." - Stella Assange

 

>>22959625 Video: Julian Assange joins mourners in Vatican City for Pope Francis's funeral - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange was among thousands of mourners who gathered in Rome for the funeral of Pope Francis. - Sky News Australia

 

>>22959629 Video: Julian Assange Seen at Vatican on Day of Pope's Funeral - Storyful News & Weather USA

 

>>22959632 Video: Julian Assange visits St Peter's square with family to attend funeral of Pope Francis - Julian Assange visits St Peter's square with family to attend funeral of Pope Francis - Global Pulse USA

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:15 a.m. No.23252242   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 87

Julian Assange - Post-Plea Deal Freedom and Activism - Part 2

>>22981980 ‘He did right by me’: Julian Assange endorses Anthony Albanese - WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has broken his silence to endorse a second term for Anthony Albanese as he praised the prime minister’s efforts to secure his release from prison. Assange, who attended Pope Francis’ funeral in the Vatican last week in a rare public sighting, has almost entirely avoided public commentary since his dramatic return to Australia last June after he struck a plea deal with the US Justice Department. He was detained for more than five years in London’s high security Belmarsh Prison after being charged with espionage and computer hacking for publishing hundreds of thousands of classified US military documents on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Albanese raised Assange’s case several times in his meetings with former US president Joe Biden, making clear his release was a priority for the Australian government and public. Assange said that, in the lead-up to Saturday’s federal election, many Australians had asked him whether Albanese’s role in his release had been overstated and whether he “has the backbone to stand up for Australians on other tough issues”. “The truth is, in what became an impressive field of advocates, Albo did more to secure my freedom than any other politician or public figure, even more than the late Pope, whose support was both moving and significant,” Assange said in a statement provided to this masthead. Assange said that Albanese had promised to lobby for his release when he was opposition leader and followed through on this pledge when he became prime minister. “Against all expectations for an Australian politician, once elected, he kept his word,” Assange said. Beyond advocating for his release, Assange said the Albanese government “has proven itself unusually capable of rescuing Australians caught up in sensitive political situations”. “Albo hasn’t just stood up to the US to end the political imprisonment of an Australian, he’s also intervened for other Australians detained in difficult circumstances, including in China,” he said, referring to the release of journalist Cheng Lei. “Does this mean Albo will put Australian interests first and skilfully navigate tensions between the US, EU, and China? I can’t say for sure. But I do know this: He can. Albo did right by me, and he is worlds apart from [Scott] Morrison. You don’t need to be a bully to have a backbone.”

 

>>23067540 'Recovered' Assange promotes Cannes documentary - Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has "recovered" from his years in detention, his wife told AFP, as a new documentary about him premiered at the Cannes film festival on Wednesday. Assange is at the world's biggest film festival to promote "The Six Billion Dollar Man" by American director Eugene Jarecki but is not yet speaking publicly. After posing for photographers on Tuesday wearing a T-shirt with the names of killed Gaza children, he reappeared Wednesday for the red-carpet screening wearing a black tuxedo. The 53-year-old former hacker has declined all interview requests, however, with his wife Stella Assange saying that "he'll speak when he's ready." But she was upbeat about his health and said he was already thinking about his next steps. "We live with incredible nature at our doorstep (in Australia). Julian's very outdoorsy. He always has been. He's really recovered physically and mentally," Stella, a Spanish-Swedish lawyer, told AFP. Assange was released from a high-security British prison last June after a plea bargain with the US government over Wikileaks's work publishing top-secret military and diplomatic information. He spent five years behind bars fighting extradition from Britain and another seven holed up in the Ecuador embassy in London where he claimed political asylum. Award-winning director Jarecki said his film aimed to correct the record about Assange, whose methods and personality make him a divisive figure. "I think Julian Assange put himself in harm's way for the principle of informing the public about what corporations and governments around the world are doing in secret," Jarecki told AFP. Anyone willing to trade years of their life for their principles, "I think you'd have to look at that person as having heroic qualities," he added.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:15 a.m. No.23252244   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 88

The Transgender Agenda - Australia and Worldwide - Part 1

>>22964124 Video: Violent clashes in Melbourne after protesters descend on women’s rights rally - Out-of-control violence has marred busy CBD streets after protesters, who were left unaccompanied by police, clashed with passersby following earlier skirmishes with law enforcement in which four officers were injured. Earlier on Saturday, trans-rights activists and police clashed as protesters roamed the city after gathering to disrupt a women’s rights rally. Pro-trans protesters moved through the streets from Parliament House, where they played drums and chanted at the Women Will Speak event on the steps outside Victoria’s parliament earlier in the day. About 50 people attended the Women Will Speak event, which drew about 440 protesters, according to Victoria Police. “Around 40 people then conducted a march across the CBD, blocking intersections with wooden pallets and swarming local retailers,” police said in a statement. Major intersections, including the corner of Collins and Swanston streets, were blocked while demonstrators chanted anti-police sentiment and pro-trans slogans. Shouts of “quit your job” and “defund the police” could be heard as dozens of police formed lines to try to control the group’s movements. Melbourne’s Women Will Speak rally is part of the global Let Women Speak movement, which argues that laws promoting trans inclusion have eroded sex-based rights and intruded unreasonably into women’s spaces. It follows this month’s UK Supreme Court ruling, which decreed that for the purposes of Britain’s Equality Act, a woman is defined by her biological sex. Before the rally, Victoria Police enacted special search-and-arrest powers to deter neo-Nazis from gatecrashing the women’s rights rally and planned counter-protest by trans activists.

 

>>23076711 As Mel’s gender ‘ricocheted’, she went under a surgeon’s knife - A young woman who thought for years she was non-binary or a transgender man is suing two doctors and Monash Health for negligence, claiming gender treatment that included having both breasts surgically removed had caused her “significant injury”. Mel Jefferies, a 33-year-old who was born as female and is now living again as a woman, has launched the civil lawsuit in the Victorian County Court. One of the defendants in the case is Dr Jeff Willcox, a Melbourne GP with an “interest in gay men’s health, sexual health … and transgender health”. The others are Jaco Erasmus, a psychiatrist with a special interest in transgender health, and Victoria’s largest public health service, Monash Health. Jefferies’ statement of claim, recently lodged with the court, accuses all three of falling short of delivering professional standards of care, including those outlined by the widely recognised World Professional Association for Transgender Health. The claim says those standards require doctors to ensure that “anyone experiencing mental health conditions must have these well-managed and thoroughly controlled prior to the commencement of the testosterone treatment”. Jefferies says her years of mental health issues were not under control at the time of her treatment and were exacerbated by the testosterone prescribed by her doctors and surgery. Her statement of claim says she has a permanently “deepened voice, hirsutism, clitoromegaly [a clitoris significantly larger than normal], vaginal pain/discomfort, abnormal body odour and acne, and pelvic floor dysfunction (as indicated by urinary incontinence).” Under Australia’s current model of transgender treatment, known as “affirming care”, people’s gender identity is “affirmed and supported” when it conflicts with the gender they were assigned at birth. “For years I just kept getting affirmed by the medical fraternity and the trans community for something I wasn’t,” Jefferies told this masthead. “They kept telling me, ‘You’re non-binary, trans, maybe you’re non-binary’. I tried to pull away but they just kept pulling me back in … I never developed the discernment to say ‘this isn’t true’.” If Jefferies’ case proceeds to a judicial decision, it could represent a test case for the duty of care doctors owe towards people seeking affirming care. It comes as the number of young people seeking treatment for gender dysphoria has increased dramatically in the past decade.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:15 a.m. No.23252246   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 89

The Transgender Agenda - Australia and Worldwide - Part 2

>>23145527 Child gender-medicine:Family Court judge critical of Michelle Telfer over gender guidelines, evidence- Australia’s foremost gender-medicine expert and the lead ­author of the nation’s guidelines on gender-affirming care, Michelle Telfer, was excoriated by a Family Court judge for giving ­misleading evidence in support of a mother who wanted her child to be prescribed puberty blockers, in a judgment that has called into question the integrity of treatment of gender-dysphoric children. Judge Andrew Strum, who stripped the mother of custody and effectively blocked the 12-year-old from accessing treatment, criticised the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne for failing to give the child a formal gender dysphoria diagnosis until the court proceedings had commenced, despite having treated the child for six years. The hospital’s chief of medicine, Professor Telfer, he said, cheapened the suffering of victims of Nazism when she suggested a landmark review that recommended limitations on medication for gender-dysphoric ­children formed part of a wave of trans­gender oppression commencing with the Nazis. Justice Strum also questioned the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents, authored by Professor Telfer, for not recognising children may not be capable of making life-altering medical decisions about their gender identity. The judgment, published in April, anonymised Professor Telfer as Associate Professor L and did not name the Royal Children’s Hospital due to statutory prohibitions preventing the identification of witnesses in Family Court proceedings. However, The Australian was on Thursday successful in petitioning the court to name ­Professor Telfer and her place of work, arguing it was in the public interest for the practices of an ­expert healthcare professional and a pre-eminent medical service to be transparent. “Nationwide News submits, and I agree, that the interests of the public are best served by members of the public having access to the entire context of Associate Professor L’s opinion or practice, so that it can be properly assessed,” Justice Strum ruled in approving the application. “Such transparency, including as to that expert’s identity, enables individuals to evaluate critically the validity, reliability and implications of that opinion and practice.” Justice Strum also agreed with The Australian’s submission that revealing Professor Telfer’s identity would assist parents, caregivers and their children in making informed decisions about their health.

 

>>23145583 ‘Public interest’: gender clinic’s practices should be open to scrutiny, judge rules - Michelle Telfer was a young paediatrician at The Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne in 2012 when she was asked to make what would become a life-changing ­decision. A colleague heading into retirement approached her to take on his small number of young transgender patients requiring support for medical transition. It was a tempting offer to work in this developing branch of medicine. “I really didn’t have much experience working with trans and gender diverse young people. I didn’t have any actually,’’ Telfer, a Perth-born former Olympic gymnast and Commonwealth Games medallist, told the Emerging Minds podcast in 2019. “But when I started to meet these young people, I really ­enjoyed it and really felt that it was a worthwhile area to assist in.” Back in 2012, the service received just 18 referrals and Telfer was advised these patients would be a small part of her clinical practice. How wrong that prediction would prove. Each year since 2012, referrals have rapidly grown (to 473 by 2020) and the cause of trans and gender diverse young people has “actually taken over my life’’, Telfer, now one of Australia’s foremost child gender medicine experts, told The Lancet Child and Adolescent Health. She was instrumental in establishing the hospital’s gender service - the country’s first multi­disciplinary clinic for children and young people, which has been lauded internationally – and played a key role in developing Australian clinical guidelines for trans and gender diverse young people. Those say children should drive decision-making around medi­cal intervention and doing nothing, or withholding gender affirming care, was not a neutral option and may increase depression, anxiety and suicid­ality. Now Family Court judge Andrew Strum has heard testimony from Associate Professor Telfer and other experts. He has agreed she and the hospital should be identified by name. Justice Strum said airing of the entire context of Telfer’s opinion or practice would enable “individuals to evaluate critically the validity, reliability and implications of that opinion and practice.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:16 a.m. No.23252248   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 90

The Transgender Agenda - Australia and Worldwide - Part 3

>>23145597 COMMENTARY: Doctor’s advocacy trumped duty to objectivity in court - "Medicalised gender change for distressed minors, driven by puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones, is experimental treatment. Since 2019, jurisdictions as different as Finland, Florida, Sweden and England have independently put these hormonal treatments to the gold-standard test; in each case, systematic reviews of the evidence have shown it to be very weak and uncertain. So, there is no good-quality evidence to claim that paediatric medical transition benefits mental health, let alone prevents suicide. The known risks include brittle bones, cardiovascular problems, loss of fertility, sexual dysfunction and potential harm to the brain. And yet children’s hospitals and clinics across Australia continue to promote “gender-affirming care” as lifesaving. How was this allowed to happen? The public deserve an answer. We know this treatment was introduced as routine, bypassing the safeguard of clinical trials. The innovator was the gender clinic of the Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, which launched radical treatment guidelines in 2018. Misleadingly badged as “Australian standards”, these low-quality guidelines have nonetheless become the de facto national blueprint for gender clinicians. There are serious questions whether normal governance processes were followed at RCH - or at myriad other institutions that proudly stated their adherence to the guidelines. Until recently, it was hard to find a single Family Court case in which the judges had decided a child was simply incapable of consenting to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones or a double mastectomy. And then, in April, the court handed down its ruling in re Devin, ordering that this 12-year-old boy be protected from puberty blockers at an unnamed children’s hospital gender service. Justice Andrew Strum’s decision in re Devin is the first detailed analysis by an Australian court of the fundamental flaws of the gender-affirming medical model. He was sharply critical of the doctor anonymised as “Associate Professor L”, who described herself as “an advocate for trans rights”. It is not a personal attack to name Dr Telfer or examine her role. In 2020, RCH claimed The Australian’s coverage of the issues was “targeted, personal, inflammatory and unprecedented,” but could not provide a single example. For some years, Dr Telfer courted uncritical media publicity. She was named in the celebratory re Kelvin ruling. She has been the central figure in the institution of gender-affirming care in Australia. When The Australian began its scrutiny of RCH, Dr Telfer was director of the country’s most influential gender clinic, first author of the de facto national guidelines and president of the activist Australian Professional Association for Trans Health; a recipe for conflicts of interest. Dr Telfer is still at RCH, as chief of medicine, and is still promoted on the gender clinic website. Just as she accepted plaudits in the past, she must be held accountable now." - Bernard Lane, writer of Gender Clinic News - theaustralian.com.au

 

>>23145628 ‘Vital’ to know who makes the calls on gender treatment: ex-judge - A former Family Court judge says it is “absolutely vital” jurists follow the example of judge Andrew Strum in making public the names of institutions treating gender dysphoric children, adding that it is critical parents are aware of the range of opinions on the efficacy of treatment. Stuart Lindsay, who presided in the Family Court from 2004-2014, praised Justice Strum’s ruling making public the identity of eminent gender-medicine expert and Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne chief of medicine Michelle Telfer, whom he had criticised for giving misleading evidence in support of a mother who wanted her child to be prescribed puberty blockers. Justice Strum, in his judgment, had also questioned the Australian Standards of Care and Treatment Guidelines for Trans and Gender Diverse Children and Adolescents, authored by Professor Telfer, for not recognising children may not be capable of making life-altering medical decisions about their gender identity. “These are cases that involve a highly controversial area of medicine and one that specifically impacts upon children, and one that a lot of practitioners in the area of medicine involved say if it’s not properly scrutinised is capable of doing great harm to children at a particularly vulnerable part of their lives,” Mr Lindsay told The Australian. “So it’s absolutely essential that people involved in making decisions or in giving advice to parents about appropriate therapy for children who might be experiencing gender dysphoria are aware of the range of opinions in relation to the efficacy of the treatment, and especially the dangers of the treatment.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:16 a.m. No.23252249   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 91

The Transgender Agenda - Australia and Worldwide - Part 4

>>23212894 Video: Hawthorn's AFLW star Tilly Lucas-Rodd undergoes gender affirming top surgery - Over the AFLW off-season, Hawthorn star Tilly Lucas-Rodd underwent top surgery, a gender-affirming procedure that involves the removal of breast tissue in essentially a double mastectomy. "People often have asked me, 'How do I feel now that I've had it' - post surgery seeing myself," Lucas-Rodd told ABC Sport. "A lot of people [who've had the operation] have really big emotions and really big elation. But for me, it was like, 'this is how I've always looked when I saw myself' … This is what I've always thought and always seen internally." Lucas-Rodd had their nipples put back on with nipple grafts, which some people post-surgery choose not to. Before the surgery, the 29-year-old midfielder-turned-halfback would tape their chest or wear a really tight binder, including when they were playing footy. The compression would restrict their rib cage movement, make it hard to breathe and hurt their back. "But the alternative was to feel really uncomfortable on a national stage playing sport - and something that's so public," said Lucas-Rodd, who is an inaugural AFLW player, former Hawks captain and All Australian. Lucas-Rodd even played in a guernsey at least two sizes too big, to hide their body. "Last year I wore, I think, a size medium or large when I was previously an extra small," they said. "I had huge discomfort around my chest, huge dysphoria. It didn't match up with what I felt internally I should look like." Now, Lucas-Rodd beams when thinking about playing this season, which starts in August. "I've already felt that with training and being able to just be free, to not wear a sports bra, not wear a binder, just put my jumper on," they said. "Going out onto the track in our training guernseys or our singlets, I just feel so, so happy and so just like me."

 

>>23212910 Video: AFLW star Tilly Lucas-Rodd ‘so happy’ after gender-affirming top surgery - AFLW star Tilly Lucas-Rodd has revealed they are “so happy” and feel so much like themselves after having gender-affirming top surgery during the off-season. The 29-year-old Hawthorn star is the league’s first current player to undergo the surgery - which removes breast tissue in a similar way to a double mastectomy - and said they feel so much more comfortable. “People often have asked me, ‘How do I feel now that I’ve had it’ - post-surgery, seeing myself,” Lucas-Rodd, who identifies as non-binary, told ABC Sport. “For me, it was like, ‘this is how I’ve always looked when I saw myself’ … This is what I’ve always thought and always seen internally.” Prior to the surgery, Lucas-Rodd was taping or binding their chest and wearing a guernsey multiple sizes too large in order to reduce dysphoria. This practice however, was causing issues, sometimes restricting breathing and movement, and creating back pain. Since returning to training, however, Lucas-Rodd said they are relishing the freedom of not needing a sports bra or chest bindings. “Going out onto the track in our training guernseys or our singlets, I just feel so, so happy and so just like me,” they said. “I had huge discomfort around my chest, huge dysphoria. It didn’t match up with what I felt internally I should look like.” The halfback came out publicly as non-binary in 2023, saying at the time that they “don’t really identify strongly as my assigned gender at birth, which is female.” “I don’t really feel strongly that I fit into that label as a female, and at the same time I don’t feel like I’m a male, either. I guess I’m in between that,” they said in a video shared on the Hawthorn website. “So for me, the label ‘non-binary’ feels most comfortable about how I identify in terms of my gender.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:17 a.m. No.23252250   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 92

The Transgender Agenda - Australia and Worldwide - Part 5

>>23230223 Royal Children’s Hospital board must not ignore judge’s trans case findings - "Justice Andrew Strum, who recently decided the case of Re Devin, was so concerned about the evidence he heard from a clinician at the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne he prohibited a mother from taking her son back to its gender service unless the father agreed. Justice Strum also considered it in the public interest to name one of the experts, the hospital’s chief of medicine, Michelle Telfer, who has been Australia’s foremost leader in promoting what some call “gender-affirming care”. In the way the best judges do, he delivered a carefully reasoned explanation about why he found the RCH’s practices so disturbing, based on the trial evidence that had lasted four weeks. At the heart of his concerns was that Telfer - and the other expert witness who was identified only as a “senior clinical psychologist” – did not offer the court a coherent justification for their clinical practice. Telfer and the senior clinical psychologist, the judge noted, believe gender identity is “internal and immutable” and not open to external influence. But he observed “neither of those experts were able to point to any empirical or substantive basis for their opinion but, rather, only to anecdotal reports from transgender adults”. According to Justice Strum, Telfer made assertions that seemed to contradict the idea that a child’s gender identity is immutable. Neither clinician could say at what age children have the capacity to know their “true” gender identity, but both were confident that in this case the child could do so when he was only six years old. After an experienced and highly respected judge has so strongly criticised the hospital’s chief of medicine, and called into question the clinical practices at its gender service, one might expect the chief executive or the board to announce the hospital was treating the issues raised with the utmost seriousness. In a similar situation, other hospital boards might well have announced a formal independent inquiry. Instead, the hospital released a statement saying its gender service delivers a “world-leading, multidisciplinary model of care”. The RCH’s reputation is on the line. The situation in Victoria is no doubt complicated by the position of its government, which has championed the practices of the RCH gender service and incorporated the underlying beliefs of the transgender movement into its educational policies and programs. But this is an issue about whether the RCH is practising evidence-based medicine. It is also a child protection issue, for the consequences of providing unnecessary and irreversible treatments to children, with such adverse and lifelong effects, could be grave. This is a board responsibility now. It must not shirk it." - Patrick Parkinson, emeritus professor of law at the University of Queensland - theaustralian.com.au

 

>>23230227 U.S. Study on Puberty Blockers Goes Unpublished Because of Politics, Doctor Says - The leader of the long-running study said that the drugs did not improve mental health in children with gender distress and that the finding might be weaponized by opponents of the care - Azeen Ghorayshi, Oct. 23, 2024 - nytimes.com

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:17 a.m. No.23252252   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 93

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 1

>>22968851 AUKUS Milestone: First Royal Australian Navy Enlisted Students Graduate Nuclear Power Training - The first eight enlisted sailors and five additional officers from the Royal Australian Navy graduated from the U.S. Navy’s Nuclear Power Training Unit (NPTU) Charleston as part of the Australia, United Kingdom, United States (AUKUS) trilateral security partnership. The graduates, who trained alongside U.S. Navy personnel, began the rigorous naval nuclear power training pipeline in October 2024. The curriculum encompassed a wide range of critical subjects, including mathematics, nuclear physics, reactor principles, and nuclear reactor technology. This achievement marks an important step in Australia’s development of a sovereign, conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarine (SSN) fleet. “This graduation marks a significant step forward for our Navy,” said Royal Australian Navy Commodore Daniel Sutherland, Commander Submarine Force. “Having naval nuclear power-qualified officers, and now sailors, is critical in meeting our goal of operating conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines.” NPTU trains officers, enlisted Sailors and civilians for shipboard nuclear power plant operation and maintenance of surface ships and submarines in the U.S. Navy’s nuclear fleet. “I remain impressed with the quality of Australian submariners who come through the naval nuclear propulsion training pipeline,” said Capt. Robert Rose, Commander, NPTU Charleston. “Six officers previously completed prototype training, each performing exceptionally well. I fully expect these recent graduates, especially our first enlisted personnel, will excel in the fleet.” “The opportunity for our U.S. Navy students to train alongside their Australian counterparts is beneficial to both our countries’ Sailors,” said Master Chief Ed Jackson, Engineering Department Master Chief for Naval Reactors. “These Royal Australian Navy sailors will now transition to our submarines to continue their training and qualifications in operating naval nuclear propulsion plants.”

 

>>22977683 Video: Malcolm Turnbull: Trump 'enormous disruption', AUKUS 'absolute shocker' - In an interview on Q+A with Jack Tame, former Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull said both New Zealand and Australia needed to do more to ensure their defence capabilities are “sovereign”, and not controlled by another country. “For countries like Australia and New Zealand, we are confronted with a United States with whom we shared the same values for 80 years now no longer sharing those values,” said Turnbull. He said Trump instead believes in the ethos of “might is right”, and that should be very concerning for smaller countries that rely on the rules-based international order. Turnbull cited the bullying of NATO members Canada and Denmark in an attempt to annex Canada as the 51st state, and Greenland as American territory, as examples of how the United States has dramatically changed. “We have to be clear-eyed about this - this is not the United States we grew up with. Trump’s values are more closely aligned with Vladimir Putin than they are with any of his predecessors – Democrat or Republican.” “This is a time of enormous disruption, and I think the challenge for Australia and New Zealand - we have to look to a world where there is no longer American leadership.” Turnbull argued the AUKUS deal, in which Australia is scheduled to receive nuclear-powered submarines, puts Australia in a dangerous position and potentially without any submarines at all. He added Australia's submarine deal as part of Pillar 1, however, is a "massive mistake" and an "absolute shocker". Turnbull explained that Australia’s existing fleet is coming to the end of its life, and under the terms of the AUKUS agreement, the Virginia-class submarines can only be given to Australia if the USA has sufficient reserves, which is very unlikely to be the case in the coming decades.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:18 a.m. No.23252253   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 94

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 2

>>23058451 AUKUS: Donald Trump’s billionaire envoy joins Keir Starmer in show of force for nuclear submarine pact - British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer declared AUKUS as central to his government’s defence policy, pledging unprecedented investment and warning that the UK must treat defence as “the first thought in the morning and the last at night”. Starmer was joined by new US ambassador Warren Stephens - a billionaire private banker and big Republican donor – who threw his full support behind the AUKUS pact at a packed event inside the Palace of Westminster on Monday night (Tuesday AEST), calling it “vital” to global peace, security and prosperity. “This is not just a project,” Starmer told MPs, diplomats and defence leaders in a surprise appearance at the gathering. “It is a national endeavour … AUKUS strengthens the bonds between our three nations, and it shows that when we talk about security and stability, we mean it - in the Indo-Pacific and here at home.” The All-Party Parliamentary Group on AUKUS event at the House of Lords marked Stephens’ first public appearance since his arrival in London. He used the opportunity to send a clear message: Donald Trump backs AUKUS. “The vital partnership of our three countries cannot be overstated … President Trump, and I know this to be true as it has been repeatedly proven throughout history.” Stephens said AUKUS could also drive prosperity through an innovative private sector, adding that government works best when “we get out of the way and let our businesses innovate, compete and collaborate to improve people’s lives”. The remarks from the banker-turned-diplomat, who gave at least $US6 million ($9.3 million) to Trump’s election campaign, appeared as a clear pitch to those concerned about the pact’s future after the president’s return to the White House. “This alliance enjoys broad bipartisan support,” said the former chief executive of financial services company Stephens Inc. “I’m sure that you all are aware that bipartisanship is certainly not always the case in American politics these days. However, it is when it comes to AUKUS.”

 

>>23087088 AUKUS in space: Scott Morrison proposes ‘Pillar 3’ for defence pact - Scott Morrison - the founder of the landmark AUKUS agreement – has proposed taking the security partnership into the space domain to bolster its effectiveness as a military deterrent and make Australia a more valuable ally. The former prime minister said he would support a new AUKUS “Pillar 3” aimed at helping Australia develop a stronger space capability that could complement US, Japanese, as well as European and UK systems. This would bolster deterrence, with Mr Morrison noting that space was “now a frontline in US-China strategic rivalry.” But he also said it would send a valuable signal to the private sector about the important role it had to play. “The blurred lines between civil and military domains created by the dual use space technologies makes this even more challenging to contest,” he said. AUKUS - the trilateral security partnership between Australia, the UK and the US – offered a chance to harness the power of the private sector in the space domain to “deliver strategic advantage over potential adversaries.” In a speech to the 2025 Australian Space Summit in Darling Harbour on Tuesday, Mr Morrison said that “Australia can and must stand out as a rising actor with the potential to plug important holes in allied capabilities.” He warned that China was “advancing, especially in satellite manoeuvrability, launch, and spaceplane tech,” while Russia was “reportedly developing a space-based nuclear anti-satellite weapon.” As space became “more enmeshed in geopolitical rivalry,” Mr Morrison said the allied network needed to function as a “cohesive whole, just as it has in all other domains for decades.” “By 2030, with deliberate development, Australia can offer unique contributions: southern-hemisphere sensors watching the skies, a strategic location for space operations, and additional resilient satellites and launch options,” he said.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:18 a.m. No.23252254   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 95

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 3

>>23115853 Video: AUKUS partnership: UK unveils radical defence overhaul as Starmer eyes Russian threat - Britain says it will radically change its approach to defence to address threats from Russia, nuclear risks and cyber attacks by investing in drones and digital warfare rather than relying on a much larger army to engage in modern combat. Responding to US President Donald Trump's insistence that Europe must take more responsibility for its security, Prime Minister Keir Starmer has pledged the largest sustained increase to UK defence spending since the end of the Cold War. The UK government's strategic defence review, published on Monday, local time, included plans to increase the size of its nuclear-powered attack submarine fleet. The new submarines will be a model jointly developed by the UK, US and Australia under the security partnership AUKUS. "We know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression," UK Defence Secretary John Healey said in a statement. Britain will build up to 12 of its next-generation attack submarines - which are nuclear-powered but carry conventional non-nuclear weapons — to replace the current fleet of seven by the late 2030s, the Ministry of Defence said in a statement. But with limited finances, the government's overall plan to boost the UK's defence capability envisages making the army more lethal, not larger, by learning from Ukraine where drones and technology have transformed the battlefield. The government has promised to raise defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2027, and target a 3 per cent level over the longer term.

 

>>23125063 Video: AUKUS has serious problems, Australia probably won't receive any submarines: Malcolm Turnbull - Malcolm Turnbull, former Prime Minister of Australia, says that AUKUS wasn't a very good deal for the country and that he thinks President Trump would love the deal as the U.S. would receive money without necessarily having to deliver anything in return. - CNBC International Live

 

>>23144688 Little penguins loom as a potential torpedo for AUKUS works - Little penguins could prove to be a big headache for Australia’s AUKUS program. Work on the key infrastructure needed to support the first Australia-based nuclear-powered submarines will be just one broken wing away from being forced to stop, at least temporarily, under conditions imposed on the project by Environment Minister Murray Watt. A single squashed skink would similarly bring work on the all-important upgrades at the HMAS Stirling naval base, on Garden Island off the coast of Rockingham in Western Australia, according to Senator Watt’s decision. Defence needs to carry out a series of upgrades and new installations at HMAS Stirling in preparation for the arrival in 2027 of the first submarines under AUKUS. The US and, later, British nuclear-powered submarines will be based out of HMAS Stirling as part of Submarine Rotational Force West as the program’s first major step. But the wildlife of Garden Island is proving a complicating factor. The main colony of little penguins on the island sits immediately southwest of HMAS Stirling’s main Diamantina pier in Careening Bay, while smaller colonies sit immediately northeast. All of them fall within the main “proposed action area” where the infrastructure upgrades will occur. The order requires Defence to “immediately initiate a stop-works procedure” in the event any little penguin, Perth slider (a type of skink) or marine mammal is found killed or injured in the area, under the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water’s conditions. Defence will also be responsible for arranging veterinary care or assistance “from an experienced wildlife carer” for any native terrestrial or marine animal” found injured. Among other conditions imposed on the work is a ban on dredging or disposing of spoil in Careening Bay during the little penguin’s breeding or moulting periods, “or as otherwise advised by a suitably qualified seabird conservation ecologist”.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:19 a.m. No.23252255   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 96

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 4

>>23163733 Alliance assessment:Pentagon launches review of Aukus nuclear submarine deal- The Pentagon has launched a review of the 2021 Aukus submarine deal with the UK and Australia, throwing the security pact into doubt at a time of heightened tension with China. The review to determine whether the US should scrap the project is being led by Elbridge Colby, a top defence department official who previously expressed scepticism about Aukus, according to six people familiar with the matter. Ending the submarine and advanced technology development agreement would destroy a pillar of security co-operation between the allies. The review has triggered anxiety in London and Canberra. While Aukus has received strong support from US lawmakers and experts, some critics say it could undermine the country’s security because the navy is struggling to produce more American submarines as the threat from Beijing is rising. Australia and Britain are due to co-produce an attack submarine class known as the SSN-Aukus that will come into service in the early 2040s. But the US has committed to selling up to five Virginia class submarines to Australia from 2032 to bridge the gap as it retires its current fleet of vessels. That commitment would almost certainly lapse if the US pulled out of Aukus. Last year, Colby wrote on X that he was sceptical about Aukus and that it “would be crazy” for the US to have fewer nuclear-powered attack submarines, known as SSNs, in the case of a conflict over Taiwan. In March, Colby said it would be “great” for Australia to have SSNs but cautioned there was a “very real threat of a conflict in the coming years” and that US SSNs would be “absolutely essential” to defend Taiwan. Sceptics of the nuclear technology-sharing pact have also questioned whether the US should help Australia obtain the submarines without an explicit commitment to use them in any war with China.

 

>>23163745 US launches AUKUS review to ensure it meets Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda - The Pentagon is reviewing the AUKUS security pact between Australia, the US and the UK to ensure it aligns with President Donald Trump's "America First" agenda, a US defence official told the ABC. But Defence Minister Richard Marles said he remained confident the pact would remain intact, and a review was a "perfectly natural" thing for a new administration to do. The news follows US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's recent request for Australia to significantly boost its defence spending "as soon as possible". The US defence official said the review "will ensure the initiative meets … common sense, America First criteria". "As Secretary Hegseth has made clear, this means ensuring the highest readiness of our service members, that allies step up fully to do their part for collective defence, and that the defence industrial base is meeting our needs," the official said. Under the AUKUS pact, Australia would be armed with nuclear-powered submarines at a cost of more than $350 billion. Elbridge Colby, who is the under secretary of Defense for Policy and has voiced scepticism about AUKUS, is leading the review, according to the UK's Financial Times. Last August, Mr Colby tweeted he was an AUKUS "agnostic". "In principle it's a great idea. But I've been very skeptical in practice," he wrote, but added he'd become "more inclined based on new information I've gleaned".

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:19 a.m. No.23252256   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 97

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 5

>>23163758 ‘Save Australia from itself’: Paul Keating fires up as Trump administration announces review into AUKUS deal - America’s bombshell review into the future of the AUKUS nuclear power submarine deal could be the “moment Washington saves Australia from itself”, former Prime Minister Paul Keating has said. Australia made its first AUKUS down payment to the US in February, transferring nearly $800 million to help boost the country’s submarine production. Overnight, the Trump Administration announced its biggest AUKUS sceptic Elbridge Colby will head a review into whether the US should pull out of the submarine deal with Australia. Former Prime Minister Paul Keating has joined the chorus of Australia’s own AUKUS sceptics, saying the move “might very well be the moment Washington saves Australia from itself … from the most poorly conceived defence procurement program ever adopted by an Australian government”. In a statement, Mr Keating described AUKUS as being “hurriedly scribbled on the back of an envelope by Scott Morrison, along with the vacuous British blowhard Boris Johnson, and the confused president, Joe Biden - put together on an English beach, a world away from where Australia’s strategic interests primarily lie”. “The Albanese government had the chance to undertake a review on its own terms when first elected to office in May 2022, but denied itself the opportunity for fear of being seen as dodgy on the alliance,” Mr Keating said. “Now President Trump’s Pentagon, as it is entitled to do, is subjecting the deal to the kind of scrutiny that should have been applied to AUKUS in the first instance. The review makes clear that America keeps its national interests uppermost. But the concomitant question is: why has Australia failed to do the same?”

 

>>23163785 ‘Time to wake up’: Turnbull, opposition seize on Trump’s AUKUS review - Defence Minister Richard Marles and AUKUS architect Scott Morrison have insisted they are confident the United States will keep supporting the $368 billion submarine deal despite the Trump administration’s decision to review the security pact to ensure it puts “America first”. The United States on Thursday confirmed it was conducting a 30-day review into whether the AUKUS submarine deal should be changed or scrapped, throwing into doubt Australia’s future maritime defence and adding a pressure point to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s expected meeting with US President Donald Trump on the G7 sidelines in Canada next week. Former prime ministers Paul Keating and Malcolm Turnbull, both prominent AUKUS critics, said the US review gave the Albanese government cause to revisit the deal. But Marles downplayed the situation and revealed the government had known about the review for weeks. Keating said the review gave Australia an opportunity to forge a new path on national security and accused the Labor government of avoiding its own review “for fear of being seen as dodgy on the alliance”. Turnbull also questioned why Australia had not reviewed the scheme. “The UK is conducting a review of AUKUS. The US … is conducting a review of AUKUS,” he said on X. “But Australia, which has the most at stake, has no review. Our parliament to date has been the least curious and least informed. Time to wake up?”

 

>>23174371 Anthony Albanese’s mission: save the AUKUS pact - Anthony Albanese is preparing a series of major defence funding announcements and will ensure Australia delivers on its pledge to service US nuclear submarines from 2027, as his government scrambles to lock in support from Donald Trump on the $368bn AUKUS pact. The Prime Minister on Friday will fly from Canberra on a critical one-week overseas trip that will bring him face to face with the President for the first time, amid concerns from the US that AUKUS will force it to deliver major funding and defence capabilities to a country that has not committed to support Washington in a conflict over Taiwan. Ahead of Mr Albanese travelling to Fiji, the US and Canada, the Pentagon on Thursday announced a snap 30-day review of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal, led by influential Defence Under Secretary for Policy, Elbridge Colby, who has expressed concerns about Australian defence spending and American industrial shipbuilding capacity. As G7 leaders prepare to gather in the Canadian town of Kananaskis over the weekend amid rising tensions between the US and Iran, The Australian understands Mr Trump is yet to lock in any bilateral meetings with counterparts including Mr Albanese.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:20 a.m. No.23252258   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 98

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 6

>>23174548 Give Trump ‘a new Pine Gap’, say experts claiming AUKUS go-slow - Slow progress on new submarine bases is fuelling calls to offer the US “another Pine Gap” in Western Australia, as defence and diplomatic heavyweights claim a lack of urgency on AUKUS is giving Americans reasons to doubt Australia’s seriousness about the pact. Defence analyst Michael Shoebridge and Yaron Finkelstein, who was chief adviser to former prime minister Scott Morrison when he signed up to the AUKUS pact, said the US had doubts about how much Australia valued the program. Shoebridge said AUKUS was a “gift to the Albanese government that let them wave this totem around” to demonstrate national security credentials at a time when Australia was spending “almost nothing” in the next 10 years and deferring big-spending decisions. Finkelstein, Morrison’s former principal private secretary, said the Biden administration also had concerns about what it perceived as Australian delays in pushing ahead with AUKUS. “There’s a bit of a legacy, a perception, about [whether] our heart is in it,” he said on Sky News. “They had a view that maybe we don’t want this as much as when we first started.” One solution Shoebridge and former Home Affairs chief Mike Pezzullo endorse is a joint submarine base in Australia. The prospect of a US submarine base in Australia is highly contentious, with union and Labor left figures arguing nuclear submarines are dangerous.

 

>>23174595 Video: Malcolm Turnbull wants Australia to invest in alternative defence capabilities as US reviews AUKUS agreement - Former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull says the Australian government is misinformed when it comes to the AUKUS deal and the United States' ability to provide nuclear submarines. Mr Turnbull, a longtime critic of the defence pact, claimed Defence Minister Richard Marles made an incorrect statement on 7.30, on the same day the US announced a review of the deal. Mr Marles said he was confident the US could increase its production capacity to two boats per year to honour the deal. "We need to get to that point in the early 2030s. That's the time frame," Mr Marles told 7.30. "Right now, we are confident that we can meet that. And we are seeing real progress." Mr Turnbull said Australia's defence minister was "misinformed". "Richard Marles said that the rate of production of Virginia-class submarines is increasing. That's not true," Mr Turnbull said. "The latest numbers given to the Congress by the navy on 11 March this year was that the rate of production is 1.1 per annum. They need to get to two by 2028 to be able to meet their own requirements, and to 2.33 to meet their own, plus Australia's. And they have not been able to lift production rates despite the expenditure of over $10 billion over the last six or seven years. So, they've got a real problem."

 

>>23174623 Paul Keating is right, US AUKUS review might very well ‘save Australia from itself’ - "The Financial Times cited six sources on Wednesday reporting that US Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Elbridge Colby is leading a review of the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal with the UK and Australia to determine whether the US should scrap the project. The report noted that this move has triggered anxiety in Canberra. Some Australian media outlets were quick to respond with headlines like "not to worry" and "not a harbinger of collapse." The eagerness to defend the project instead made the anxiety quite obvious. However, other voices emerging from Australia have proven more compelling and harder to ignore. Australian former prime minister Paul Keating issued a statement on Thursday, saying that "the review makes clear that America keeps its national interests uppermost. But the concomitant question is: why has Australia failed to do the same?" Perhaps some organizations and individuals may express disappointment or even shock over the US review, but clear-headed Australians have likely breathed a quiet sigh of relief. For those anxious about the US review, this may also be an opportunity to confront the reality that Australia has always been the party paying the highest price with little gain in this deal. China certainly is not a fan of AUKUS, as it undermines peace and stability in the region. However, China is far from alone; many countries across the region have also voiced concerns or outright opposition to the pact." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:20 a.m. No.23252259   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 99

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 7

>>23182448 ‘Pillar 1 problematic, Pillar 2 great’: Inside Colby’s AUKUS mind - If US Under-Secretary of Defence for Policy Elbridge Colby’s personal views on AUKUS come to fruition, then Australia’s largest ever military project won’t be happening in its current form. A review is now being conducted by the Pentagon so it’s wait and see, but in a long interview conducted with Mr Colby just before he was hand-picked by Donald Trump for the Pentagon, he conveyed his view on the two pillars of AUKUS, approved by Congress, and subject to Presidential authority. “Pillar I is very problematic, Pillar II is great, no problem,” Colby said. Pillar I involves the US selling nuclear-powered submarines to Australia in the early 2030s. Pillar II is about other military intelligence sharing including the development of artificial intelligence. Colby scuttled several positive takes I posed about the sale of nuclear submarines to Australia. “How are we supposed to give away nuclear attack submarines in the years of the window of potential conflict with China?” he asked me back. “A nuclear attack submarine is the most important asset for a western Pacific fight, for Taiwan, conventionally. But we don’t have enough, and we’re not going to have enough,” Colby said. America is nowhere near producing enough of its own submarines. so why would they sell any to Australia?

 

>>23182504 Video: PM locks in meeting with Trump to discuss AUKUS, tariffs - Anthony Albanese will meet Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 summit to discuss the long-term future of the $368bn AUKUS deal, the strategic importance of the US-Australia relationship in the Indo-Pacific and why Australian companies should be exempt from the US President’s tariffs. The Prime Minister on Sunday (AEST) confirmed he would hold formal bilateral talks with Mr Trump at the Kananaskis summit in Alberta, where leaders of the world’s most powerful western democracies will gather in the next 24-hours under the backdrop of wars in the Middle East and Ukraine. Mr Albanese, who has spoken three times with the US President since his return to the White House, said while Mr Trump was dealing with major global and domestic issues he expected to have a “constructive engagement” with him. The meeting is expected to occur overnight Tuesday (AEST). “Obviously we will raise tariffs, we will raise the importance of AUKUS. And we will have a discussion as two friends should,” Mr Albanese said. Under pressure from US officials for Australia to urgently lift its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, Mr Albanese said the context of his AUKUS discussions would centre around what Australia contributes and the potential of the military pact in terms of benefits for the US.

 

>>23186828 Defence ties with Australia key to Albanese’s pitch in historic Trump meeting - Anthony Albanese will stare down Donald Trump’s demands for Australia to double its defence spending, but reassure the president the country is a trustworthy partner in the strategic contest with China as the prime minister works to safeguard the AUKUS pact. In a meeting with Trump this week that looms as among the most important of his three decades in politics, Albanese will put access to Australia’s critical minerals on the table as the Trump administration reviews whether AUKUS fits with its “America First” agenda. Asked whether Australia would stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the US if China attempted to take Taiwan by force - a source of some concern in some parts of the Trump administration – Albanese did not answer directly on Monday. But the prime minister said AUKUS would play a key peace and security role. “Australia’s a trusted partner to promote peace and security in our region,” Albanese said. “We have been so forever. If you look at the role that Australia has played, [we] will continue to play an important role in the Pacific. The visit that I had on the way here to Fiji is another example and a reminder of the fact that Australia is a trusted partner in the Pacific.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:20 a.m. No.23252260   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 100

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 8

>>23192204 PM in subs, regional pitch to keep Trump sweet - Anthony Albanese will use the $368bn AUKUS nuclear submarine deal and Australia’s expanding role in the South Pacific to reassure Donald Trump’s administration that his government is committed to countering Chinese military aggression in the Indo-Pacific. Ahead of his critical first in-person meeting with the US President on Wednesday (AEST), which is scheduled for at least 20 minutes on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, Mr Albanese has launched a major defence of his government’s backing of the US in terms of military support and increased security co-ordination. Amid concerns about Xi Jinping’s military build-up in the ­region, there are now more US marines based in Australia than since the end of World War II, and joint defence and intelligence operations have been ramped up to unprecedented levels. The Australian Defence Force is preparing to host more than 30,000 military personnel from 19 nations next month as part of the 11th Australia-US led Exercise Talisman Sabre, which will for the first time include training sites in Papua New Guinea. The Australian understands the Prime Minister is preparing to green-light US access to Australia’s critical minerals as Western nations grapple with China’s dominance in the supply of the ­resources.

 

>>23192280 Anthony Albanese relies on Keir Starmer to secure Donald Trump’s backing for AUKUS - When it comes to AUKUS, Anthony Albanese is lucky to have Sir Keir Starmer in his corner. Australia’s Prime Minister has missed his chance, for now, to personally win Donald Trump’s direct support for the submarine pact, with the US President departing the G7 in Canada to deal with the Middle East war. But amid a snap 30-day review of AUKUS ordered by the Trump administration, the British Prime Minister appears to have secured presidential backing for the deal. Unlike Albanese, Sir Keir managed to get a meeting with Trump before he skipped town. Asked later at a joint press conference with the President whether the trilateral subs deal was proceeding, the pair looked at each other and nodded in agreement. Answering for them both, Sir Keir said: “Yep, we’re proceeding with that, it’s a really important deal to both of us.” While not quite from the horse’s mouth, the statement will be a relief for Albanese. Britain can build its nuclear submarines if need be, but Australia would be up the proverbial creek if the AUKUS deal fell over. The navy’s six Collins-class boats are on their last legs, even with planned life-extending upgrades. After having run down the clock with false starts on Japanese and French submarines, the collapse of AUKUS would leave Australia without a viable submarine force for decades. And as the government has warned, only nuclear-powered submarines offer the capability Australia needs to stealthily deter Chinese threats. The fact Albanese has to rely on Sir Keir to get Trump to endorse the AUKUS deal is somewhat embarrassing for him, but he’ll take any help he can get.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:21 a.m. No.23252261   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 101

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 9

>>23197965 Scott Morrison calls for an AUKUS pillar 3 - the space frontier - Scott Morrison, the chief architect of the AUKUS pact has called for the military alliance to be expanded into space under a third pillar that would see Australia take a key role in the geopolitical deterrence in the southern hemisphere. The former Coalition prime minister has declared that space technology would become as critical to western defence architecture as the submarine program and could bring other nations including Japan and NATO into the alliance. With the AUKUS program now under review by the Pentagon, the extension of the program into a third pillar - space technology – would also provide the political incentive Donald Trump needs to put his own stamp on the AUKUS pact which was inked by Mr Morrison and former Democrat President Joe Biden and the UK’s former Prime Minister Boris Johnson. “As the Trump administration examines how to improve AUKUS, there’s another important factor - space,” Mr Morrison says in an opinion piece published in the US paper, The Wall Street Journal. “If our nations are serious about deterrence, then we must prepare for new theatres of geopolitical competition. The global space economy now exceeds $630 billion and is projected to nearly triple in value by 2035. But space is no longer a benign domain. Beijing is already operating dual-use, civil-military technology across its space sector, launching manoeuverable satellites, conducting co-orbital rendezvous operations, and testing systems capable of disabling adversary assets, such as its Shenlong spaceplane.”

 

>>23197971 How Donald Trump can launch AUKUS into space - "Time has borne out what I said to President Trump on the White House South Lawn in September 2019: While Australia may look to the US as a vital ally, we will never leave it to America alone to deal with security issues. In that spirit, in early 2020 as prime minister I assigned a small team to engage Washington about the possibility of Australia acquiring nuclear-powered submarine technology. Two years later the AUKUS agreement among Australia, the UK and the US was born, amid bipartisan support in all three nations. Now, it’s time for AUKUS to grow, and Mr Trump is the right person for the job. AUKUS is a platform for collective deterrence against an axis of autocratic regimes threatening global and regional security, especially in the Indo-Pacific. The agreement’s first pillar enables Australia’s acquisition of its first nuclear-powered sub fleet. Its second pillar facilitates cooperation on advanced military capabilities, from quantum computing to hypersonic missiles. The Chinese Communist Party opposed AUKUS vehemently - confirming its strategic value. No American president since John F. Kennedy has shown more commitment to space than Mr Trump, from backing the Artemis Moon to Mars program to creating the US Space Force and promoting commercial innovation through public-private partnerships and now the Golden Dome. That leadership makes him the natural champion of an AUKUS Pillar III that consolidates cooperation across launch systems, satellite architecture, cybersecurity, data integration and industrial innovation. This would enable better coordination of allied space policies and create shared standards across defense and commercial systems. It should also provide a platform for integrating non-Aukus allies such as Japan and NATO members into the same architecture. That would make clear that the allies’ space systems are resilient, interconnected and can’t be targeted in isolation. Establishing a Pillar III would ensure that space, the ultimate high ground, is secured by free nations, not our enemies. America and Australia have stood shoulder to shoulder on land, at sea and in the skies. Now we must do the same in orbit." - Scott Morrison, Australia’s prime minister from 2018-22 and vice-chairman of American Global Strategies - theaustralian.com.au

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:21 a.m. No.23252263   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 102

AUKUS Security Pact and Nuclear Submarine Program - Part 10

>>23212722 Albanese ‘must raise subs with Trump’ as AUKUS deadline looms - The waning possibility of Anthony Albanese landing a face-to-face meeting with Donald Trump in coming weeks has sparked alarm from the Coalition and defence ­experts, who have raised concern about the two leaders not meeting before Washington’s controversial AUKUS review concludes and instead leaving the outcome “to chance”. Despite indications from the Prime Minister that he may attend the NATO summit in The Hague next week - which Mr Trump may also take part in – The Australian understands that this option is becoming increasingly unlikely, amid questions over whether Mr Trump will be able to leave the US because of the Middle East crisis. Without meeting the President on the sidelines of NATO, the next best option being considered by the government is a sit-down ­between the two leaders on the sidelines of a UN summit in New York in September. That would be well after the Pentagon’s 30-day snap review of AUKUS concludes, which was ­announced on June 12. Opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor said the ­inability of Mr Albanese to put ­forward Australia’s case for the ­defence pact and Canberra’s ­defence spending - which the US has been demanding be lifted – was “disappointing”. “A face-to-face meeting is ­crucial to seek assurances on AUKUS,” he said. “Australia should be at the table engaging at the highest levels to advocate the importance of AUKUS and ensure our interests are understood and defended, not waiting on the sidelines. It is disappointing the Prime Minister appears unlikely to meet with President Trump before the Pentagon’s review into AUKUS concludes.”

 

>>23234931 US congressmen urge Trump administration to continue 'critical' AUKUS submarine deal to secure Indo-Pacific - US politicians who have championed AUKUS have stepped up lobbying efforts with the Trump administration, saying the defence technology pact is "critical" to deterring "Chinese aggression" and urging the White House not to dump it. The Trump administration said earlier this month it would conduct a 30-day review of AUKUS, with US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth telling Congress last week his department would "make sure it fits the priorities of the president and that our defence and shipbuilding industrial base can support." The federal government has played down the impact of the review, saying it was confident the White House would continue to endorse the initiative. Five US congressmen who sit on multiple influential house defence committees have now written to the defense secretary to declare their support for AUKUS, saying it was a "critical mission" to "deter Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific region." The five congressmen - including Republican and House Armed Services Committee chair Mike Rogers as well as Democrats Joe Courtney and Adam Smith — said in their letter that they were "confident in our ability to meet both US fleet requirements and our AUKUS commitments." The politicians said additional funding commitments from Congress, on top of Australia's payments, have allowed US shipyards to ramp up steel fabrication and increase construction pace. "Shipbuilders delivered two attack submarines in 2024 (USS New Jersey and USS Iowa), with two more slated for delivery in 2025 (USS Massachusetts and USS Idaho), and another two in 2026," they wrote. They argued that increasing capacity would "open a pathway to selling the Virginia-class submarines to Australia in 2032, 2035, and 2038", as planned.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:22 a.m. No.23252264   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 103

Australia / China Tensions - Part 1

>>22964070 Chinese envoy demands Australia stands with Beijing over US ‘bully’ - China’s ambassador to Australia claims US President Donald Trump is turning the world of international trade into a “lawless jungle”, and is demanding Anthony Albanese and Peter Dutton stand with Beijing against the “bullying” of the White House’s tariff war. As Mr Trump moved to strike a deal with China and ease fears of a damaging global economic crisis, Beijing’s envoy Xiao Qian told Australia’s leaders the US-Australia alliance does not give the Trump administration a “free pass” on trade. Mr Xiao writes in The Australian that Beijing is ready to stand up to Washington, and suggests Australia as an independent nation should join the Chinese. “Faced with unilateral bullying, China will resolutely stand its ground, not only to safeguard its legitimate rights and interests but also to prevent the world from descending into a lawless “jungle” where might makes right,” Mr Xiao writes. “Both China and Australia are important countries in the Asia-Pacific region and beneficiaries as well as upholders of the multilateral system and free trade. Amidst the changing international landscape, China stands ready to work with all parties to resolutely oppose all forms of ­hegemony and bullying, firmly uphold the UN-centred international system and the international order based on inter­national law, and contribute to the prosperity and stability of the region and the world at large.”

 

>>22964078 COMMENTARY: America’s tariffs are turning the world back to ‘law of the jungle’ - "Recently, the United States has indiscriminately imposed tariffs on all its trading partners, coercing them into initiating so-called “reciprocal tariff” negotiations and demanding each country make significant concessions. The international community must remain highly vigilant against such actions. If the US is allowed to act with impunity, the world will revert to the “law of the jungle” where the strong prey on the weak, and all countries will become victims. Today, the US, obsessed with the supremacy of power, brazenly imposes tariffs on the entire world, pursues hegemonic politics and unilateral bullying in the economic and trade fields, and places American interests above the common interests of the international community, making the entire world, including its “allies” and “partners”, pay the price for its selfishness. This has subverted the existing international rules and order, and will bring the international community back to the “law of the jungle”, with small and weak countries bearing the brunt of the consequences. China is a steadfast defender of multilateralism and the international rules-based order, consistently advocating for the resolution of differences through dialogue and negotiation. However, the US, wielding the “big stick”, has indiscriminately imposed exorbitant tariffs on countries around the world. Both China and Australia are important countries in the Asia-Pacific region and beneficiaries as well as upholders of the multilateral system and free trade. History has repeatedly proven that a powerful country is not an almighty talisman, and alliance is not a free pass. On issues concerning principles and fundamental national interests, only by making independent decisions based on the interests of one’s own country and people can a nation secure a brighter future." - Xiao Qian, China’s ambassador to Australia - theaustralian.com.au

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:22 a.m. No.23252265   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 104

Australia / China Tensions - Part 2

>>22964082 COMMENTARY: Sorry, Ambassador Xiao Qian: Beijing is no defender of the free world - "If hypocrisy had a house style, the Chinese ambassador’s latest dispatch in these pages would be its template. Xiao Qian’s essay attacking the US measures the gulf between Beijing’s words and deeds in seven-league boots. In his telling, China is the guardian of global order. While there’s every reason to be disturbed about the recent actions of the US President, choosing a world run with Chinese characteristics demands a serious character check. The ambassador would have us believe Xi Jinping is a safer option than Trump. But it is not a real choice at all, only the illusion of one. There are still checks and balances on an American president; in China, only one man is truly free. Trump disrupts the order. Xi bends it to his will and wants to make us slaves to it. Xiao would have us forget what China has done and focus only on what it says. Perhaps he thinks we’re stupid and, as a close observer, probably sees our election campaign as proof of that point. No doubt the usual chorus of useful idiots will amplify the ambassador’s talking points. No doubt our government will run its usual lame line that we will co-operate where we can and disagree where we must, as China continues to push and we retreat. Still, it is good that Xiao was given space in a national newspaper to share his views. It exposes the strategy Beijing uses in every possible forum: take a sliver of truth, distort it and deploy it to undermine trust in open societies. And the courtesy of free speech might give the ambassador pause to consider this: in what Chinese paper would a foreign critic be given the same freedom? Where are the Chinese publications that dare to criticise the Communist Party? That is what makes our system and America’s better than his. The right to disagree isn’t punished with imprisonment or death. Some may see free speech as a small thing; I see it as the only thing that stands between us and tyranny. I am happy to see it extended even to someone who, if his world were realised, would take it from me. Chinese diplomats often season their rhetoric with Confucian platitudes, the moral maxims the Cultural Revolution once tried to erase from history. Here’s one from our side: the best predictor of future behaviour is past behaviour. But, frankly, that is too mild. In the days when China was hitting Australia with trade sanctions, there was talk of Beijing seeking a demonstration effect - a warning to other impudent countries – captured in an old idiom: kill the chicken to scare the monkey. In that spirit, I offer this ancient Australian riposte: I wouldn’t trust Beijing to run a chook raffle."'' - Chris Uhlmann - theaustralian.com.au

 

>>22998144 Relief in Canberra as Solomon Islands PM Jeremiah Manele averts no-confidence vote - Solomon Islands Prime Minister Jeremiah Manele has averted a high-stakes no-confidence vote led by his pro-Beijing predecessor Manasseh Sogavare after a day of political manoeuvring that had the capital Honiara on high alert and Canberra braced for a potential setback in its Pacific strategy. The move by at least 10 defector MPs, including four-time former prime minister Sogavare, threatened to plunge the Pacific Island country back into political turmoil and derail the Albanese government’s flagship $190m policing program for the Solomons designed to limit China’s growing reach in the country’s security sector. The rogue group - which included key opposition figures Matthew Wale and another former prime minister, Gordon Darcy Lilo, who tabled the no-confidence motion in parliament last week – claimed to command a slim majority in the 50-seat parliament. But Mr Manele appeared to have headed off the putsch by Monday night when he released a photo which showed him standing with 27 MPs, suggesting he had coaxed several back into the government fold. By Tuesday morning it became clear the no-confidence motion had been omitted from the day’s parliamentary schedule, prompting speaker Patteson Oti to adjourn parliament until 2pm (local time) when he announced the vote had been withdrawn. That will have come as a relief to the Albanese government, which has worked well with Mr Manele since he replaced the combative Mr Sogavare last May.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:22 a.m. No.23252266   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 105

Australia / China Tensions - Part 3

>>23007467 OPINION: A pragmatic China policy can provide Australia the certainty it seeks - "Recently, discussions within Australia have intensified regarding the trajectory of China-Australia relations, as various voices attempted to offer "road maps" for the direction the Anthony Albanese administration should take. Last week, the Australian Labor Party secured a decisive victory in the federal election, with Albanese becoming the first Australian leader in 21 years to be re-elected. Consequently, the state of China-Australia relations under Albanese 2.0 has become a focal point of public discourse. For instance, a Lowy Institute article on Wednesday suggested that Canberra should "speak up" about Beijing's "human rights issues." Similarly, the infamous Australian Strategic Policy Institute continues its anti-China agenda by labeling China "the most active state engaged in hybrid threats targeting Australia." These perspectives underscore a segment of Australian discourse that views China through a confrontational lens and aims to increase suspicion and hostility toward the country. At a time when the global economy is slowing and geopolitical tensions are rising, China and Australia - both major players in the Asia-Pacific - should continue to choose the path of dialogue and cooperation. A sustained pragmatic and rational approach to China under Albanese 2.0 will help take the bilateral relationship to a new level of mutually beneficial cooperation, which would not only serve both countries' interests but also support stability and development in the region. Experience in recent years has shown that blindly following Washington's lead and treating China as a strategic adversary has harmed Australia's diplomatic independence and dealt real blows to its economy. Learning from those lessons and continuing to pursue a pragmatic and balanced China policy is the right strategic path for Australia." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

 

>>23012508 China criticises Australia over joint exercises with Philippines, US in South China Sea - China's Foreign Ministry has sharply criticised Australia after it conducted another joint military exercise in the South China Sea with the US and the Philippines, accusing all three nations of trying to "create trouble." The Royal Australian Navy's destroyer HMAS Sydney joined a guided missile frigate from the Philippine Navy and aircraft from both the US and the Philippines last week to conduct the drills. Clashes between China's coast guard and vessels from the Philippines have intensified over the last 18 months, and several countries - including the US, Japan, Australia and Canada — have responded by stepping up joint military exercises with the Philippines in the contested waters. China's Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian told reporters in Beijing that the United States was using the Philippines as a "pawn" against China, and that Manila had "brought in and collaborated with forces outside the region to create disruptions and flex military muscles". "The US and other countries outside the region have patched up small groupings in the South China Sea to stoke confrontation in the name of cooperation, flex military muscles in the name of freedom, and create trouble in the name of upholding order," he said. "They are the biggest source of risks undermining the peace and stability in the South China Sea." China claims almost the entirety of the South China Sea as its territory, and has ignored a 2016 ruling which found that claim had no basis under international law. Australia hasn't responded directly to China's most recent criticism but the Department of Defence said last week the joint exercise was aimed at "build(ing) mutual understanding and interoperability between nations and armed forces."

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:23 a.m. No.23252267   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 106

Australia / China Tensions - Part 4

>>23032055 Xi congratulates Anthony Albanese, calls on PM to work with China to promote ‘world peace’ - President Xi Jinping has congratulated Anthony Albanese on his re-election, saying he wants to work with the Australian Prime Minister to strengthen their relationship and promote “world peace and stability”. In a written message delivered on Tuesday as the Prime Minister was sworn in by Australia’s Governor-General, the Chinese leader said he had engaged in “in-depth discussions on strategic, comprehensive and directional issues” in his three meetings with Mr Albanese. “These discussions led to important consensuses that have provided strategic guidance to improve and grow bilateral ties,” Mr Xi said, according to Chinese newsagency Xinhua. The Chinese president said he was ready to work with Mr Albanese to “advance the China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership in a steady fashion”. “Strengthening co-operation between China and Australia is of great significance for achieving shared development and promoting world peace and stability,” said Mr Xi in comments that were also run on the front-page of Wednesday’s People’s Daily, the Communist Party’s leading newspaper. China’s Premier Li Qiang also sent a congratulatory message, according to Xinhua, saying he wanted to work with the Prime Minister on promoting a “more mature, stable and fruitful China-Australia comprehensive strategic partnership”. The Prime Minister is expected to visit China later in the year. The warm comments underscore the notable improvement in the diplomatic relationship since 2022, even as polls find actions by China continue to stoke anxiety among a majority of Australians.

 

>>23032067 OPINION: Why stable China ties are vital for Australia - "In an uncertain world, people crave stability, and Australian electoral behavior is no different: In challenging times, voters tend to stick with the incumbent government. Over the past three years, the Albanese administration has been defined by cautious steadiness. It's fair to say that stabilizing relations with China has emerged as one of Labor's standout foreign policy achievements. Since Albanese's Labor Party came to power in May 2022, it has rolled back the previous Coalition's anti-China stance and taken proactive measures to enhance dialogue with Beijing. Under the direct engagement and strategic leadership of both countries' leaders, China-Australia relations have bottomed out and rebounded, warming across the board. Exchanges in various fields have taken positive strides, and economic and trade flows have fully recovered - earning widespread support on both sides. Throughout the election campaign, Labor, as the governing party, maintained continuity in its China policy and generally adopted a rational, restrained tone in all China-related statements. This pragmatic, steady approach won the trust of voters. In this election, the Australian people ultimately chose the Labor Party, the side of certainty facing an uncertain world, based on their expectations of policy stability and continuity. The Labor government now has more reason to adhere to an independent foreign policy and to work toward the steady and sustained growth of China-Australia relations. In this way, the two countries can provide a more stable and favorable policy environment for mutually beneficial economic and trade cooperation, striving to bring more tangible benefits to both countries and their people." - Wang Zhenyu - globaltimes.cn

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:23 a.m. No.23252268   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 107

Australia / China Tensions - Part 5

>>23045815 Video: AFP will train Pacific peacekeepers to help counter China’s influence - The Australian Federal Police is boosting its role in the Pacific in the face of growing competition from China by agreeing to train Pacific island police to become UN peacekeepers. The move comes at a time when China is aggressively trying to strike police co-operation deals with Pacific Island nations as a means to gain leverage over their strategic direction. In response, the AFP is boosting its policing engagement across the Pacific Island region as part of Australia’s broader diplomatic push to prevent China establishing footholds in the region. Beijing has criticised the AFP for having an “impure motive” to “contain China” in its growing push to forge closer links with ­Pacific island nations. As part of its attempts to sideline China and forge closer relationships with the Pacific, the AFP is hosting the world’s first UN Police Peacekeeping Training course tailored specifically for the Pacific region. The course, which started in Brisbane this week, brings together 100 police officers from across the Pacific and East Timor and aims to build a deployable, Pacific-led UN peacekeeping capability. AFP Assistant Commissioner Nigel Ryan said the course would help “reinforce Australia’s role as a preferred partner of choice in the Pacific for sustained peace, security and prosperity in the region”. Mr Ryan said the AFP’s presence in the Pacific had grown “exponentially” in recent years, and despite growing competition from China he believed that Australia was still the partner of choice in policing and security. “It’s no secret that China has ambitions to increase their presence in the Pacific in the security space,” he told The Australian. “But we’ve got longstanding relationships going back decades with our Pacific partners, and they’re very strong relationships. “We are part of the Pacific family and Australia is recognised as the partner of choice, particularly in the security space.”

 

>>23045840 Taiwan urges Australia to defy China on Trump-proofing trade pact - Taiwan is urging Australia to stare down opposition from Beijing and support its admission to a sweeping regional free trade pact to help buffer it from the volatility of Donald Trump’s tariff gyrations. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced during a visit to Jakarta on Thursday that Australia will back Indonesia’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), but Taiwan’s request to join the pact has been stalled since 2021. Australia is serving as the rotating chair of the 12-nation grouping this year, giving it responsibility for guiding the group’s activities and priorities. “We definitely call for Australia’s support of Taiwan’s accession to the CPTPP, which we see as the gateway to future trade,” Taiwan’s de facto ambassador to Australia, Douglas Hsu, said in an interview with this masthead. Australia does not recognise Taiwan as a state, meaning its top envoy is known as the head of its economic and cultural office rather than an ambassador. “Australia and Taiwan have a complementary trade partnership, we believe that we can meet the high standards of the CPTPP regulations and we have a good track record dealing with other trading partners. “The CPTPP is a trade mechanism, so we definitely will urge all the members to review Taiwan’s case based on the merits instead of the geopolitics.”

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:24 a.m. No.23252269   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 108

Australia / China Tensions - Part 6

>>23062845 Anthony Albanese to visit China for second time amid Xi Jinping's push for 'mature' ties with Australia - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese will travel to China later this year to meet President Xi Jinping and Premier Li Qiang, marking his second official visit to China in two years. The ABC understands the prime minister will attend the Annual Leaders' Meeting, part of a resumed high-level dialogue last held in Canberra in June 2024 during Mr Li's visit to Australia. The trip follows a warm personal letter from Mr Xi congratulating Mr Albanese on his re-election. In the message, Mr Xi highlighted China's interest in "promoting a more mature, stable and productive" relationship with Australia, a deliberate nod to Beijing's desire to build sustained engagement with the Labor government. The second visit places Mr Albanese among a small group of Australian prime ministers to be invited to Beijing so frequently. He made stabilising ties with China a core foreign policy priority during his first term, resuming ministerial dialogue and steering the relationship out of a prolonged diplomatic freeze. During his first trip to China, in November 2023, Mr Xi invited him to return and see more of the country, reinforcing what both sides now describe as a "comprehensive strategic partnership". The trip was widely seen as a diplomatic breakthrough, not only securing the release of detained Australian journalist Cheng Lei after three years in custody, but also resulting in the removal of all remaining trade impediments imposed on Australian exports during the Coalition government. The date of the meeting is yet to be announced by Mr Albanese.

 

>>23076633 Cheap Aussie ‘Mozzie’ all the buzz to replace global market-leading Chinese drones - An Australian technology company is poised to meet a critical challenge for the nation’s security, designing a $5000 drone for military use with domestically sourced parts and those from friendly countries. The only Chinese component in Grabba Technologies’ Mozzie drone is its electric motor, and the company is working with two local firms that are close to producing Australian-made alternatives. The privately owned Brisbane company was selected for the challenge by Defence’s Advanced Strategic Capabilities Accelerator, which needed an affordable multi-mission drone under 2kg for use by the Australian Defence Force and national security agencies. The locally made drone gives Australian and allied users a trusted alternative to Chinese drones that dominate the global market. The ASCA challenge followed the removal from service of more than 800 Chinese-made drones that had been operated by the ADF, and 41 in use with the Australian Border Force. The Mozzie, which can undertake surveillance missions or drop bombs on enemy soldiers, will meet US “blue list” guidelines for technology products with entirely friendly-nation supply chains. The explosion in drone warfare seen in Ukraine has piled pressure on the Australian government to bring uncrewed systems into service as rapidly as possible. Grabba Technologies is set to sell 260 of the drones to Defence for testing by the army, navy and air force, and hopes to sell tens of thousands more to the ADF and allied militaries, and law enforcement agencies.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:24 a.m. No.23252270   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 109

Australia / China Tensions - Part 7

>>23083159 Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian hits out over ‘ethically questionable’ Port of Darwin lease buyback - The Chinese ambassador to Australia says Anthony Albanese’s promise to boot a Chinese company from operating the Port of Darwin is “ethically questionable,” urging the government to honour the 99-year lease. In a statement released by the embassy on Sunday night, Xiao Qian criticised Australia’s “ethically questionable” behaviour and said port owners Landbridge Group had made “significant investments” after winning a 99-year lease in 2015 for $506m. The comments follow an election promise to buy back the lease, with the Prime Minister threatening direct intervention if the government is unable to find a new buyer. “These efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development,” Mr Xiao said. “Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment. “It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable.” Mr Xiao said Landbridge Group had undertaken an “open and transparent bidding process” to secure the commercial contract and urged the Australian government to honour its binding commitments. While he acknowledged that Australia and China were “comprehensive strategic partners”, Mr Xiao said the countries needed to “foster mutual trust”. “We hope the Australian side will view the Darwin Port project objectively, honour its binding commitments under the contract and respect the autonomous decisions made by businesses based on development needs,” he said. “We hope the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government will create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in Australia.”

 

>>23083164 Chinese ambassador blasts Darwin Port lease plan as 'ethically questionable' - China's ambassador to Australia has fired a warning shot to the Albanese government over its plans to take back the port of Darwin, describing the move as "ethically questionable". The strategically important northern Australian port has been a hotly debated national security issue since it was leased to Chinese firm Landbridge by the NT government for 99-years in 2015. During this year's federal election campaign, both Labor and the Coalition made duelling pledges to get the port "back into Australian hands". Federal Labor has not given a firm indication of exactly how it will do that, but has repeatedly said it has been speaking with Australian firms to possibly take over the lease. Ambassador Xiao Qian published a statement on his website on Sunday, days after making a trip to Darwin where he said he visited the port and met with staff at Landbridge. "A decade ago, the Landbridge Group secured the lease for the port of Darwin through an open and transparent bidding process, fully compliant with Australian laws and market principles," he said. "Over the past 10 years, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in maintaining and building Darwin Port's infrastructure, optimising its operations and management, and expanding its customer sources. These efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development." Mr Xiao also called on the Northern Territory and federal governments to "honour its binding commitments" under the contract and "respect the autonomous decisions made by businesses made by development needs". "Such an enterprise and project deserves encouragement, not punishment. It is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable." Members of the previous NT government that leased the port to Landbridge have said the decision was made to lease it after the federal government of the day failed to fund needed infrastructure upgrades.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:24 a.m. No.23252271   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 110

Australia / China Tensions - Part 8

>>23083169 Chinese Ambassador urges Australia to objectively view Darwin Port project and honor contractual commitments - "When responding to the Albanese government's pledge during the Australian election campaign to revoke the operating rights of China's Landbridge Group over the Port of Darwin in a joint media interview, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian said that it is ethically questionable to lease the port when it was unprofitable and then seek to reclaim it once it becomes profitable. Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese mentioned in April during the election campaign that his government was working on a plan to force the sale of Darwin Port from its Chinese owner on national interest grounds, Reuters reported. During an interview published on the website of the Chinese Embassy in Australia on Sunday, Xiao said that Chinese side has consistently maintained communication with both the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government (where the port is located) through diplomatic channels. He elaborated that a decade ago, the Landbridge Group secured the lease for the Port of Darwin through an open and transparent bidding process, fully compliant with Australian laws and market principles. Over the past 10 years, Landbridge Group has made significant investments in maintaining and building Darwin Port's infrastructure, optimizing its operations and management, and expanding its customer sources, said Xiao. China and Australia are comprehensive strategic partners. The two sides should foster mutual trust, as mutually beneficial cooperation aligns with our shared interests. We hope the Australian federal government and the Northern Territory government will create a fair, transparent, and predictable business environment for Chinese enterprises operating in Australia, the ambassador noted." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

 

>>23087093 US eyes Darwin Port prise from Chinese-owned company Landbridge Group - A US private equity firm with strong ties to the Trump administration is poised to make an offer to buy the Port of Darwin from its Chinese owner, in a test of ­Anthony Albanese’s resolve to bring the port back under ­Western control. The Australian can reveal New York-based Cerberus Capital Management is preparing a formal proposal to buy the port from Landbridge Group’s billionaire owner Ye Cheng, who is a close confidant of senior Chinese ­Communist Party figures. It’s understood the investment firm’s offer will be slightly above the $506m that Landbridge paid 10 years ago for its 99-year lease over the facility. The company says the facility is not for sale, but one source said the port operator was open to offers of about $1bn. The Prime Minister warned in the midst of the election campaign that Landbridge must either sell the port voluntarily or it would be forcibly acquired by the government. The US has had longstanding concerns over the port’s ­Chinese ownership, but Mr Albanese has been facing pressure from Beijing to back down on his pre-election pledge to strip Landbridge of the lease. Cerberus Capital Management was until recently run by co-­founder Steve Feinberg, who was appointed in March to be US deputy defence secretary. Representatives from the company met Landbridge Group and Northern Territory Treasurer Bill Yan last week. Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian said forcing the company to give up the lease would be “ethically questionable” given it had ­secured it through an open and transparent bidding process and made significant investments in the facility since then. “These ­efforts have brought remarkable improvements to the port, turning its financial situation from losses to profits and contributing positively to local economic and social development,” the ambassador said in comments posted on the Chinese embassy website.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:25 a.m. No.23252272   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 111

Australia / China Tensions - Part 9

>>23087100 Global Times editorial: If Australia forcibly takes back Darwin Port, it will leave behind enduring pitfalls - "As a port operation project obtained through a normal market-oriented and transparent bidding process - and one that has undergone at least three political and security reviews over the past decade unjustly - the Darwin Port operated by China's Landbridge Group has repeatedly become a "political football" in Australian domestic politics. Since the current election cycle, it has come under renewed pressure for destroying the contract and forced takeover by the Australian government. On this issue, Chinese Ambassador to Australia Xiao Qian recently stated in an interview with Chinese and Australian media that China has maintained communication with Australian federal and local governments over the Darwin port through diplomatic channels. He also noted that "It's very morally inappropriate to rent out the port when it is in the red and take it back once it is profitable." It is well known that Darwin Port only became linked to so-called "national security" and subjected to a wave of political and security scrutiny after so-called "concerns" were voiced from Washington. However, recent Australian governments' review have all concluded that there were no so-called "national security risks" associated with the port. The latest review in 2023 even found "not necessary" to cancel or alter the lease. However, the recent surge in rhetoric about tearing up the deal - even being framed during the election campaign as a bipartisan "consensus" - clearly shows that the undercurrents of anti-China sentiment in Australia are once again resurfacing. The operation of Darwin Port is, at its core, a market-driven economic project and should operate within the framework of the rule of law and market principles. However, when pressure from Washington overrides Australia's own national interests, and rule-based commercial activities are trampled by political logic, what suffers is not only Australia's international credibility, but also the fragile foundation of mutual trust and its own strategic autonomy - a space that could have been preserved from external military rivalry. We urge the Australian government to prioritize the broader picture, uphold the spirit of contract, return to the rule of law, and stop distorting economic cooperation with political bias. Whether the Port of Darwin becomes a hub of prosperous trade or the eye of a geopolitical storm is not a difficult choice, but it does test Canberra's strategic wisdom." - Global Times - globaltimes.cn

 

>>23090704 Toll, super funds join suitors for Chinese-owned Darwin Port - Logistics powerhouse Toll is part of a US private equity fund’s bid to buy out the Chinese owner of the Port of Darwin, offering an Australian flavour to a transaction being driven by national security imperatives that superannuation funds are also weighing up. The partnership by Toll and Cerberus Capital Management is just one potential suitor for the port, which is effectively on the market after Prime Minister Anthony Albanese pledged during the election campaign to terminate Chinese company Landbridge’s 99-year lease on the key cargo gateway for northern Australia. Superannuation funds are also running the rule over the port, sources familiar with the matter told The Australian Financial Review, after Albanese indicated he wanted them at the bidding table. Albanese’s promise to take the lease out of Landbridge’s hands is poised to revive diplomatic strains with Beijing after Chinese ambassador Xiao Qian warned it was ethically questionable and the company should not be punished. Two sources, granted anonymity to speak on sensitive matters, said Cerberus had partnered with Toll to take over the port and had already met with the Northern Territory government and political figures, as well as Landbridge representatives, as part of its pitch. Cerberus’ local representative declined to comment on its interest or confirm Toll’s involvement, citing commercial confidentiality. Toll did not respond to a request for comment. One of Australia’s major superannuation-backed asset managers, IFM Investors, also declined to comment on whether it was a prospective buyer. While Cerberus has links to the Trump administration through its co-founder Steve Feinberg, who was appointed to be deputy US defence secretary, the bid appears to have come independently of the US government.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:25 a.m. No.23252275   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 112

Australia / China Tensions - Part 10

>>23090715 ‘We want it in Australian hands’: Albanese cool on US bid to buy Darwin Port - Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has insisted he wants the Port of Darwin returned to Australian ownership, as an American private equity firm makes a play to buy the strategically significant asset from its Chinese owners. Both Labor and the Coalition announced during the election campaign that they would move to strip Chinese firm Landbridge of its controversial 99-year lease of the port, which sits directly opposite Darwin’s Larrakeyah Defence Precinct. The prospect of a forced divestiture has angered Beijing, which feels Chinese companies are being unfairly singled out for punishment over national security concerns. Albanese also downplayed the prospect of joining any international effort to impose sanctions on leading Israeli politicians over the war in Gaza and settlement building in the occupied West Bank, despite a call from Labor elder statesman Gareth Evans to sanction Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and two of his far-right cabinet members. Asked if he would support a bid by US investment firm Cerberus to buy the port, Albanese told reporters: “We’ve said we want to see it in Australian hands. I notice this speculation which is there, but we’ll examine the process. We’re determined to make sure it’s in the national interest for it to be in Australian hands.” He left some wriggle room on overseas offers, saying: “But if there are other proposals, we’ll work those through. But we’ll work those through on a commercial basis.”

 

>>23094566 Pacific Island nations support China's Taiwan claims at high-profile foreign ministers' meeting - Pacific nations have backed China's claim over Taiwan during a high-profile meeting, but have shied away from directly endorsing Beijing's push to "reunify" the democratically ruled island with the mainland. China has also taken a shot at the United States over climate policy, promising to work with the region to combat climate shocks despite the Trump administration's decision to abandon the Paris Agreement. China's Foreign Minister Wang Yi yesterday sat down with foreign ministers from eight Pacific nations - along with senior officials from three others — in the southern city of Xiamen. It's the third time China has held a meeting with Pacific foreign ministers, but it's the first time the event has been held in person rather than online, and Beijing has trumpeted the gathering as a major milestone. China has long been pushing to expand its influence throughout the region, and analysts say the Trump administration's sweeping global tariffs and aid cuts will open up more opportunities for it. Beijing has also been intent on building global support for its increasingly forceful stance on Taiwan, which it has pledged to bring under its control. A joint statement issued after the meeting declared that all the Pacific nations "recognise that there is but one China in the world, that Taiwan is an inalienable part of China's territory, and that the government of the People's Republic of China is the sole legal government representing the whole of China". But the statement doesn't explicitly and directly endorse the Chinese government's push to take Taiwan, as Pacific nations like Solomon Islands and Kiribati did last year. It uses slightly softer language instead, reiterating China's determination to "realising national reunification" and saying this commitment "gained wide understanding and support at the meeting".

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:25 a.m. No.23252276   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 113

Australia / China Tensions - Part 11

>>23120694 Beijing denounces Marles over ‘China threat’ as Farrell is welcomed to Shanghai - Beijing has denounced Defence Minister Richard Marles for spreading the “China threat” while inviting Trade Minister Don Farrell to visit Shanghai in November, as Canberra comes under pressure from Washington to ramp up its defence budget and reduce its economic ties with China. Late on Tuesday, China’s Foreign Ministry condemned the US, Japan, Australia and the Philippines after the four American allies met on the sidelines of a security conference in Singapore and discussed shared concerns about Beijing’s use of force and coercion in the East China Sea and the South China Sea. “The US, together with Japan, Australia, and the Philippines, brazenly spread the false accusation of (the) ‘China threat’ at the Shangri-La Dialogue and sought to use the East China Sea issue and the South China Sea issue to sow discord and incite confrontation between regional countries. China strongly deplores and firmly opposes it, and has made serious protests,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian told a press conference in Beijing. Hours later, in Paris, Senator Farrell was feted by his Chinese counterpart, Commerce Minister Wang Wentao, who urged Canberra to “jointly safeguard the multilateral trading system” with Beijing. Senator Farrell accepted an invitation from the Chinese Commerce Minister to attend the China International Import Expo in Shanghai in November, according to a Chinese government readout of the meeting, which was held on the sidelines of the OECD. It will be the third consecutive year the Australian Trade Minister has attended the trade show, the most politically important in China.

 

>>23120778 Video: PLA, the People’s Liberation Army of China, Peace-Loving Army. - PLA, the People’s Liberation Army of China. Peace-Loving Army, for the Chinese people and people of the world. - SpokespersonCHN

 

>>23120783 Video: Archive: Chinese troops fire on protesters in Tiananmen Square - First broadcast 4 June 1989. Chinese troops opened fire on pro-democracy protesters in Beijing's Tiananmen Square on Saturday evening. The collection of students and labourers had been occupying the site for several weeks. Despite the outbreak of "unremitting gunfire", the protesters refused to leave. The BBC's Kate Adie reports from the scene. - BBC News

 

>>23120792 Video: How NBC Covered Tiananmen Square In 1989 - Warning: Viewers may find some images in this video disturbing. On the 30th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square uprising, we hit the archives and revisit our coverage. - NBC News

 

>>23120800 Video: Tiananmen Square Protests 1989: Chinese Soldiers Open Fire on Civilians - "World News" report from June 4, 1989: Chinese soldiers open fire on civilian, pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing. - ABC News

 

>>23120805 Video: Tiananmen Square: Watch The 1989 Report On The Crackdown - It's 25 years since protests in Tiananmen Square, China, were brought to a bloody end by soldiers who killed hundreds of unarmed civilians. - Sky News

 

>>23120815 Video: 1989: Tiananmen Square protests - Student protests in Tiananmen Square ended when Chinese troops fired on crowds, killing hundreds and wounding thousands. - CNN

 

>>23120830 Video: Man vs. tank in Tiananmen square (1989) - A CNN crew covering the June 5, 1989, protests in Beijing recorded a man stopping a Chinese tank in Tiananmen Square. ''The story behind the iconic 'Tank Man' photo.'' - CNN

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:26 a.m. No.23252277   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 114

Australia / China Tensions - Part 12

>>23125045 ‘We stand with Australia’: PNG drives defence pact amid China push - Papua New Guinea’s push for a defence treaty with Canberra sends a message to all competing interests in the region that the ­Pacific nation “stands with Australia” and supports the international rules-based order, PNG’s Defence Minister said in a landmark speech that nails the country’s security ­allegiances to the mast. Speaking at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute defence conference in Canberra on Wednesday, Billy Joseph said the ­recent circumnavigation of Australia by Chinese People’s Liberation Army navy ships, which also entered PNG waters, had underlined the potential threats faced by Pacific nations. “We, like everybody else, have a very strong economic partnership with China,” Mr Joseph said. “And I’m sure Australia also has the same, same as the US and everybody. But when it comes to security, we choose our traditional partners, which is Australia (and the) US. For us, the economy and ­security are intertwined, and we can’t separate one from the other. Therein lies opportunity as well as risks … that countries can use economy as a means to push the security interest. And that’s ­already happening,” he added, in unusually frank comments about Chinese economic coercion in the region. Mr Joseph said Australia and PNG were “tied at the hips”, not only by their geographical proximity but by a shared history of hardship and resilience during World War II. “That is why we have proposed from the PNG side that we should have a defence treaty,” he said.

 

>>23125059 Video: Former Australian PM Malcolm Turnbull: I'm sure that Trump will not get his way with China - Malcolm Turnbull says that China's relatively consistent and measured approach compared to the U.S.'s erraticism will be welcomed by many countries, that it is dawning on Trump he cannot bully China, and that Trump's belief that "might is right" is very unattractive to middle powers like Australia who have to work together and stand up for their values. - CNBC International Live

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:26 a.m. No.23252278   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 115

Australia / China Tensions - Part 13

>>23134162 Visa refusal sparks fresh concerns Solomon Islands may block Taipei from Pacific forum - The Solomon Islands government blocked a group of Taiwanese officials from entering the Pacific country earlier this year, stirring fresh concerns in Taipei that it might be locked out of a key regional meeting in Honiara later this year. Solomon Islands will host the Pacific Islands Forum leaders meeting in September, and signalled last year that it might break with a long running precedent and refuse visas to Taiwanese officials who want to meet with their three remaining Pacific diplomatic allies on the sidelines. Both Australian and Pacific officials insist that the Solomon Islands government has given them private assurances this year that it will not take that step. But the ABC has been told that when a small group of officials from Taiwan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs applied to enter Solomon Islands in March - largely to begin planning the logistics for its PIF delegation — their visa applications were rejected. Australian government sources have said Solomon Islands has since reassured them again that Taiwan's representatives will not be blocked in September, but that this directive was still "working its way through the system", suggesting the decision was an error. A spokesperson from the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) told the ABC it was "working closely" with Solomon Islands on preparations for the leaders meeting, "as we do with every host". "There has been no change to arrangements regarding Taiwan's engagement with the Pacific Islands Forum, which have been in place since agreed by leaders in 1992," they said.

 

>>23197948 G7: Anthony Albanese invokes concerns about China’s dominance of global critical minerals supply chains - Anthony Albanese has invoked concerns about China’s dominance of global critical minerals supply chains in his first speech at the G7 summit, warning that “critical minerals markets are concentrated and vulnerable to manipulation”. Speaking to G7 leaders in the Canadian Rockies town of Kananaskis, the Prime Minister spruiked Australia’s vast deposits of critical minerals and raised the perverse impacts geopolitical tensions are having on energy security and supply chains. Asked to address the summit by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Mr Albanese said over recent years “we have all felt the impact of conflict, non-market practices and unfair competition”. Mr Albanese did not mention China specifically but Xi Jinping’s Communist regime has overseen a domination of critical minerals supply chains. The US, Australia, Japan, South Korea and other regional allies have been working together to break Beijing’s stranglehold on critical minerals supply chains. “Critical minerals are the new drivers of energy security. Australia is blessed to have some of the largest critical minerals deposits on earth. But we are increasingly finding that critical minerals markets are concentrated and vulnerable to manipulation,” Mr Albanese said. “Producers struggle to remain competitive, and supply chains are affected by export bans and controls.” As the Albanese government progresses deals with the US and other allies to turbocharge Australia’s critical minerals market, Mr Albanese said “energy security underpins our growth and prosperity, and is essential for our economic resilience and national security”.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:27 a.m. No.23252279   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 116

Australia / China Tensions - Part 14

>>23198013 Top China military official disappears in latest purge under Xi Jinping amid rising factional politics - The disappearance of another high-ranking Chinese military official has demonstrated that no-one is indispensable to President Xi Jinping in achieving his goals. Even those among his closest allies. General He Weidong, China's second-ranking military official and co-vice chairman of the powerful Central Military Commission (CMC), has not been seen in public since March 11. His name was also absent from the official list of attendees at the funeral of his former colleague, Xu Qiliang, who was also a co-vice chairman of the CMC. With silence often treated as confirmation in China's highly choreographed political system, He's ongoing absence confirms his removal from power. His disappearance follows a similar pattern of recent high-profile purges. Former foreign minister Qin Gang and former defence minister Li Shangfu also disappeared from public view before they were removed from their positions. He's dismissal comes after a longstanding personal and professional relationship with Xi. Xi and He both served in the local government of Fujian province in the 1990s and 2000s, with He promoted to "full general" - the highest military rank — in 2017 and eventually co-vice chairman in 2022. It's a position that granted him more than just command of the military. It also made him a member of the elite Politburo - the top decision-making body of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). His sudden fall just three years into the role underscores the intensity of internal instability within the CCP. Despite projecting a unified public image, the highest level of China's political system is a pressure cooker of competing ambitions, ideological divides, and factional loyalties. Xi's leadership has been marked by a relentless consolidation of power and a sweeping anti-corruption campaign, but the frequent removal of his own appointees suggests cracks in the system he has built.

 

>>23239588 Australia to boost cyber security and provide vehicles for Solomon Islands Pacific Islands Forum - Australia will provide Solomon Islands with dozens of vehicles and cybersecurity support to help it host a high-profile meeting of Pacific leaders in September, as well as ramping up funding for aerial surveillance to track illegal fishing flotillas across the region. The Pacific Minister Pat Conroy is in Honiara on Thursday, where he will announce a $20 million support package for the Pacific Islands Forum (PIF) leaders meeting. Leaders at the meeting will grapple with a host of issues, including climate finance and Australia's bid to co-host a Conference of the Parties climate meeting, a new "Oceans of Peace" security framework championed by Fiji's prime minister, and a potentially contentious review of the Pacific's diplomatic architecture. But the gathering will also inevitably be seen as a litmus test of China's sway in Solomon Islands, where Beijing has rapidly built political influence since establishing ties with Honiara in 2019. Earlier this month China's ambassador to Solomon Islands handed Acting Prime Minister Fredrick Kologetoa a $US1 million ($1.5 million) donation to buy 27 vehicles which will ferry Pacific leaders around at PIF. Australia's $20 million package will be broader, providing funding for about 60 vehicles, cybersecurity, road upgrades and logistics support. Australia has not directly criticised China's contribution to the meeting, but Mr Conroy said the Pacific was "best served by Pacific-led institutions and processes". "Australia's commitment to Solomon Islands and the broader Pacific is steadfast. We are stronger together," Mr Conroy said. China is also expected to push for its policing teams to play a visible role providing security at the leaders meeting, something Australia will be keen to prevent, in order to burnish its credentials as a security partner for the Pacific.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:27 a.m. No.23252281   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 117

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 1

>>23012542 FBI tip-off leads to arrest of Alice Springs man for child rape - An Alice Springs man has been charged with multiple child abuse offences - including the alleged rape of a child – following a referral by the United States’ Federal Bureau of Investigation. Earlier this week NT Police received an “urgent referral” from the FBI, via the Australian Federal Police, with officers executing a search warrant and allegedly seizing “large quantities” of child abuse material. Officers from the NT Joint Anti-Child Exploitation Team, a joint child abuse taskforce comprising of the Australian Federal Police and NT Police, allege the man also sexually assaulted a child “under the age of five”, who was known to him. He has been charged with nine serious child abuse charges of sexual intercourse with child under 10, two counts of gross indecency with child under 14, three counts of produce child abuse material for use via a carriage service, possess or control child abuse material, access child abuse material and transmit child abuse material. NT Police Detective Superintendent Paul Lawson commended the “seamless collaboration” between NT Police, AFP and the FBI to bring the man before the courts. “If you allegedly abuse a child or procure, access and transmit child abuse material, we will find you, and you will be prosecuted,” Superintendent Lawson said. “We will continue to work tirelessly to protect children from harm.” Senior police warned that alleged “offenders cannot hide behind a screen” if they allegedly “carry out these reprehensible and hideous acts”. It comes just months after The Australian revealed a five-year-old boy had allegedly been raped in a remote Northern Territory community, with one advocate alleging half of the 20 remote communities she visited in 2024 had children as young as five exhibiting “harmful sexual behaviour”.

 

>>23016865 Aussie teen girl to speak at sentencing for sadistic cult ringleader Kyle Spitze - The FBI has asked an Australian teenager blackmailed into livestreaming self-harm and live sex shows to speak at the sentencing of one of the ringleaders of a sadistic extremist online cult. Kyle Spitze, 25, a notorious member of terror groups 764 and offshoot HarmNation - where offenders compete with each other to coerce kids to kill their pets and produce sexual and violent content – is due to be sentenced in a court in Tennessee in July. Among the heinous crimes he has agreed to plead guilty to are possessing child sexual abuse material - some were of a child aged 12 – and distributing ‘animal crushing’ videos. His charges relate to US victims, but the FBI have also found images of the Australian girl, who we are not naming, on Spitze’s phone. After being contacted by the FBI via the Australian Federal Police, both the Australian girl and her mother will give victim impact statements via video link at Spitze’s sentencing. A detective from the NSW police has been helping them with their statements. The mother said these predators were pure evil and her daughter, who was left suicidal, was “covered with scars that are visible, and those inside her that are not”. “She was made to mutilate her body and encouraged to starve herself, leading to a diagnosis of anorexia,” her mum said. She hopes being allowed to read her impact statement to Spitze will give her 18-year-old daughter, who was 16 at the time of the abuse, some power back. Spitze’s sick activities were exposed after a video he posted of his stepfather shooting him in the ear went viral and victims outed him as an abuser. An AFP spokesperson said intelligence sharing between international and domestic law enforcement partners has enabled them to identify and investigate online users linked to some of these extreme groups online.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:28 a.m. No.23252282   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 118

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 2

>>23016875 Video: How gun-toting Texas mum Becca Spinks takes down online cult 764 - This is the gun toting Texan mum looking to take down a new wave of sadistic online abusers grooming Australian kids to livestream sick and twisted acts from their bedrooms. In July, the self-defence educator and independent investigator, Becca Spinks, hopes to be in court to watch 25-year-old Kyle Spitze, from Tennessee, get a hefty jail sentence after he agreed to plead guilty to charges of possessing child sexual abuse material and distributing ‘animal crushing’ videos. One of his victims is Australian. “I just want to look at him and see if there’s any kind of soul left,” Spinks said. “Every time I’ve seen him on video, in a picture, he just looks demonic. He looks evil.” None of Spitze’s charges relate to the NSW victim, now 18, but the FBI found pictures of her on his phone, and she alleges he and other members blackmailed her into doing livestream sex acts and self-harm shows. She was also forced to carve their names into her body with a blade. Spitze is a big scalp for Spinks, 40, who describes herself as “just a normal mum”, who hunts predators online in her spare time. His big mistake was posting a video of his stepfather shooting him in the ear in January 2024, which went viral. His victims, who saw the video, began outing him on social media as a pedophile and sadistic Satanist in an online cult called 764, and an offshoot group called HarmNation. “The day that video went viral, Kyle was on X threatening the girls who were trying to speak out against him, and his tag was Criminal764,” Spinks said. “We looked at his followers and we found all these other abusers.” Her online detective work, along with help from his victims, including the mother of the Australian teenager, played a significant role in bringing Spitze to the attention of the FBI. And it shone a light on these deviant misfits, some children themselves, who get off on torturing mainly young girls to take part in degrading sex acts, live ‘cut shows’, animal abuse - one victim bit off the head of their hamster – and where the ultimate prize is getting someone to livestream their own suicide.

 

>>23045901 Sex abuse survivor urges Timor-Leste president not to pardon paedophile ex-priest Richard Daschbach - A woman who survived sexual abuse at the hands of a convicted paedophile priest fears he will hurt her again if the Timor-Leste government succeeds in having him pardoned. Defrocked priest Richard Daschbach, a United States citizen, was convicted by a Timor-Leste court in December 2021 after being found guilty of sexually abusing orphaned and disadvantaged young girls under his care. The high-profile trial and conviction were the first of their kind in the staunchly religious nation, where about 97 per cent of the population identifies as Catholic. Daschbach, now 88 years old, has had the strong support of Timor-Leste's Prime Minister Xanana Gusmão, who attended his 2021 trial and controversially celebrated Daschbach's birthday at the time. This week it was revealed Timor-Leste's government had proposed that the ex-priest be pardoned and released from prison. Mária, who Daschbach sexually abused when she was a child at the Topu Honis children's shelter in the country's remote west, is calling for Timorese President José Ramos-Horta to reject the government-backed proposal to release him. "If he gets out, he could commit his evil deeds to other women," Mária, who the ABC has given a pseudonym for safety reasons, said. "It looks like he will go back to the Topu Honis orphanage [where he committed his crimes] and could hurt our hearts as victims who have attended [his] trial in court." Mr Ramos-Horta must decide whether to grant Daschbach's release by Tuesday, to coincide with the country's annual Independence Day celebrations. It is a tradition for convicted criminals to receive pardons on that day. The proposal to pardon Daschbach only four years into his 12-year prison term has faced a backlash from both advocates of victim-survivors and opposition MPs. Legal aid groups in Timor-Leste have called on Mr Ramos-Horta to meet victim-survivors before making a decision on the matter.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:28 a.m. No.23252283   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 119

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 3

>>23045988 Victorian sisters abused by paedophile priest say High Court decision has halted quest for compensation - Sisters Bernie and Trish have not had a restful night since they were abused by a paedophile priest in the 1970s. "You don't sleep afterwards like a normal human sleeps. You're never carefree again, Bernie said. To sleep soundly, the sisters need to know no-one can come through their bedroom doors, so their husbands made them special wooden jams to lock them in place. "You can have happy days, and you can do things, but you're not that innocent, Bernie said. "You never, ever become that carefree kid." The sisters were abused by notorious paedophile priest Bryan Coffey - who is now dead — and the pair are pursuing the Catholic Church for compensation. But the sisters' legal pursuit is in jeopardy after the High Court made it harder to find the church vicariously liable. Coffey was never convicted of the women's abuse, but Trish received a letter of apology from the Ballarat bishop's office in 2015. Another victim, known as "DP", was also abused by Coffey when he was a five year old in Port Fairy in south-west Victoria. In 2021, he was awarded $200,000 by two Victorian courts, which found the church was vicariously liable for the harm caused by Coffey. But the church appealed that ruling to the High Court and won, because Coffey was not an employee - instead, he had a relationship of a spiritual nature with the church. "This is people pushing words around on a piece of paper as if we don't even exist anymore. And we've felt insignificant for most of our lives," Bernie said. "It's really, really shit to do it when they have knowledge that he did this to us." The landmark decision late last year has placed pressure on state governments to retrospectively change the law. "We just need someone to listen to say that this is not right. We need to make these changes to help everyone. It's unfair that every time they find an avenue, a new lawyer finds a new way of doing things [to defend the church],'' Trish said.

 

>>23080012 Father of choirboy who claimed son was abused by Cardinal George Pell settles case against Catholic Church - The father of a dead choirboy who claimed his son was sexually assaulted by Cardinal George Pell has sensationally dropped his landmark legal case against the Catholic Church. The Sunday Herald Sun can reveal the man - known only as RWQ – has setlled a claim against the Catholic Archdiocese of Melbourne after a protracted three-year fight. It is understood the man is battling cancer and ended the claim a day before lawyers were due to record his evidence in a rare hospital bedside sitting. The terms of the settlement are unclear but it is understood the church admitted no fault or wrongdoing but will pay the man some of his legal costs but not damages. The man launched legal action after Pell, who died in 2023, was freed from prison following a successful High Court appeal that saw a string of convictions for child sexual assault quashed. The choirboy’s father was seeking damages for mental harm suffered as a result of being informed by police of the alleged abuse of his late son. Pell was convicted of abusing the choirboy, who cannot be identified, who died of a drug overdose in 2014 and never disclosed any allegations of abuse to his parents or authorities. But another choirboy, known only as Witness J, testified that both boys were both abused in the sacristy of St Patrick’s Cathedral after Sunday mass in 1996. After failing to appeal a string of convictions in Victoria’s Court of Appeal, Pell was ultimately acquitted by a unanimous 7-0 decision of the High Court. Despite ending his claim, RWQ’s case will leave lasting ramifications for other psychological injury claims in Victoria because of the Church’s efforts to knock it out of court. It led to a hugely significant High Court decision that ruled “secondary” victims were free to pursue damages in such claims. The Church unsuccessfully argued that parents, siblings, friends and families of abuse victims should be ineligible to launch claims. Legal experts warned the court decision would lead to a flood of claims by secondary seeking damages against a range of organisations for psychological injury. They could include the state government, WorkSafe, the TAC, schools, clubs, kinders, religious organisations and social and cultural groups. Before his shock death following complications from hip replacement surgery in January 2023, Cardinal Pell was preparing to give evidence in RWQ’s case.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:29 a.m. No.23252284   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 120

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 4

>>23090760 Video: Darwin man, 68, allegedly livestreamed horrific acts of child sexual abuse - A Darwin man has faced court after allegedly exploiting six children in the Philippines by livestreaming sexual abuse online. The 68-year-old man appeared in Darwin Local Court charged with allegedly directing the sexual abuse of young children, as he watched the crimes live on video from another location. NT JACET, comprising members of Australian Federal Police and Northern Territory Police, started an investigation after Australian Border Force officers allegedly found child abuse material on his phone. He had been selected for a bag check on his arrival in Darwin on New Year’s Day when his phone was checked as part of the search. Police later found explicit videos and images of children, as well as video calls from the man to facilitators in the Philippines instructing them to livestream sexual abuse of children as young as six. Investigators executed a search warrant on January 3 at Dinah Beach where the man had been living in a vehicle and yacht and made the arrest. He first appeared in court on January 7 and was remanded in custody to reappear on May 27. NT JACET provided information to AFP members in Manila, which led to an investigation by Philippines National Police (PNP). Philippines authorities arrested two Philippine nationals and removed six children from harm in April. The Darwin man has been charged with two counts of sexual intercourse with a child outside Australia, two counts of sexual activity with a child outside Australia and one count of possessing child abuse material.

 

>>23103697 ‘Is your father your abuser?’ Breaking free of the shame of decades of sexual abuse - Beck Rogers’ case, according to experienced police officers, is the worst case of incest they have ­encountered. While sharing it with us, her health suffered. And yet she is resolute in the hope that her story will reach someone who is suffering in silence. The first step across the threshold of a police station is the hardest one to take for sexual assault victims. In April 2023, Beck Rogers trembled as she entered the Sexual Offences and Child Abuse Investigation Team (SOCIT) office at Frankston in ­Melbourne’s southeast. Her husband, Will, had done the research. Don’t go to a police station, he told her. A Google search urged victims of sexual abuse to go directly to one of the 28 SOCIT offices in Victoria. Beck felt a wave of nausea and her head pounded, but she pushed on. She was ushered into an interview room. Her mind raced. Where to start? How to unravel 36 years of sustained torture? Beck had suffered a lifetime of ­protracted sexual abuse, emotional control and financial coercion committed wilfully and ­frequently by her father. In telling this story to The Australian ­Weekend Magazine, Beck Rogers has decided not to hide behind an alias. She is now 41, a wife and a mother. Not long ago, it would have been almost impossible to share her experience ­publicly in this way. She would have been tied up in suppression orders that ancient lawmakers had deemed were put in place for her own protection. Beck’s first memory of life was sitting in the bath at her Frankston home. She was three years of age and her father had touched her ­indecently. The last episode of sexual abuse would take place over three decades later. Beck’s story, according to experienced police officers, is the worst case of incest they have ­encountered. While sharing it with The Australian Weekend Magazine, the frequency of her seizures increased. Beck cannot drive a car and is unable to work. And yet she is resolute in the hope her story will reach someone who is suffering in silence. “I just want to help other people,” she says. “I often think if I had known about the stories of other people in similar situations, I would have come forward much earlier.” Having the courage to go to the police put an end to her father’s abuse forever. Her story is one of survival - and telling it is an extraordinary act of generosity and a signal to victims that sharing their truth can set them free.

Anonymous ID: 4d38bc June 29, 2025, 1:29 a.m. No.23252285   🗄️.is 🔗kun

#41 - Part 121

Child Sexual Abuse, Pedophilia, Human Trafficking and Satanism Investigations - Part 5

>>23120730 Child abuse survivors pay tribute to Victorian detective Denis Ryan - Former Victorian police officer Denis Ryan has been remembered for his courage in attempting to prosecute paedophile Catholic priest Monsignor John Day in the 1970s. Mr Ryan died on Tuesday at the age of 93. He was a detective based in Mildura in north-west Victoria when he was forced out of Victoria Police in 1972 for attempting to prosecute Monsignor Day. A year earlier, he had learned of multiple allegations against the priest for child sexual abuse and began his investigation, but was told to stop by his superiors. A contemporary of convicted paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale, Monsignor Day has since been shown to be one of Australia's most prolific child sex abusers. Monsignor Day remained a priest until he died in 1978, aged 74. On Wednesday, Peter Hoysted - Mr Ryan's friend and co-author of the memoir Unholy Trinity: The Hunt for Paedophile Priest Monsignor John Day — led the tributes to Mr Ryan. "He was quite simply the best man I have ever met," Mr Hoysted said. "No sanctimony, a wicked sense of humour and courage to burn." It took more than 40 years for Victoria Police to apologise to Mr Ryan in 2016, but compensation was not made until two years later. "He never let up, refused numerous inducements offered which would have silenced him and allowed terrible crimes against children to remain in the shadows," Mr Hoysted said. John Fitzgibbon, who was abused by Monsignor Day, described Mr Ryan as "a great man" who validated the abuse local children had suffered. "He listened. [It was important] to be heard and believed because when we were younger, we didn't think anybody would believe it," Mr Fitzgibbon said. "But it was always Denis who was there for you. He believed it because he had statements from us younger ones." In 2015, Victoria Police admitted a conspiracy to cover up the crimes of Monsignor Day went right to the top, with Mr Ryan telling the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse that "a Catholic mafia" within Victorian Police had thwarted his attempts to charge the priest. "His determination meant a lot to us all," Mr Fitzgibbon said. "He's a chap that's going to be really missed in our community and missed by a lot of victims that he still had time for."

 

>>23248497 Paedophile priest Alexis Rosentool: The scandalous case that sank the Aussie Cossack revealed - A senior priest of the Russian church in Australia can be revealed as a paedophile after a court suppression order concealed his name from the public as he faced trial. Meanwhile, a devout Kremlin propagandist has chalked up 920 days hiding in Sydney’s Russian consulate after flagrantly breaching the same suppression order, having played a bizarre part in the priest’s downfall. Alexis Rosentool is a senior figure in the Russian Orthodox Church Outside Russia, a branch of the church that went into exile during the rise of the Soviet Union in 1920. Last week he was found guilty of four charges related to his abuse of three males, this masthead can reveal. Two male victims were indecently assaulted in the 1980s, and Rosentool had an “unlawful sexual relationship” with a child victim two decades later. Details of the crime are sparse because Rosentool’s name has been suppressed by the courts for years. The order suppressing his name only lifted as the priest was taken into custody to await sentencing. An unusual twist to the saga involves a Sydney-born, pro-Russian YouTuber who calls himself the “Aussie Cossack”, whose collaboration with police contributed to Rosentool’s arrest. However, Simeon Boikov’s involvement has also resulted in him spending time in jail before he eventually fled to the Russian consulate in Woollahra to avoid rearrest weeks after being released.