>The constitution is clear, all PERSONS, not citizens, are guaranteed due process.
You can thank Bush Jr. for allowing 'persons' to be "enemy combatants" so you are wrong.
>The constitution is clear, all PERSONS, not citizens, are guaranteed due process.
You can thank Bush Jr. for allowing 'persons' to be "enemy combatants" so you are wrong.
all will know if Trump is a deepstate fraud if he backs Cornyn.
>>22961447
I thought we had free speech rights. I'm conservative and want the country to return to the Constitution. Why is it ok to speak about one group but not ok to speak about another? This is hypocritical and spits in the face of the First Amendment. If you don't like certain speech; you do not "shut it down"; you create more speech that supports your side. It does not matter what group(s) are in the sphere of conversation, Jewish, Christian, Muslim. Speech should be free. This is bullshit and a stupid road to go down historically.
Speech is either free or it's not. Do not say we have free speech when we clearly do not.
I can't speak to your statement because it's nonsense.
they are just play-acting with Trump. They will sandbag and stall until he is gone.
non sequitur nonsense
>Needs to read the 1st Amendment
Red herring.
I'm not talking about limits ie: "screaming fire" in a theater or inciting a riot etc. I am talking about government ALLOWING speech against one GROUP but FORBIDDING speech against another.
why are laws pertaining to antisemitism enforced but laws against pertaining to anti-christian speech ignored?
this country is a joke
"I got the J&J OneShotยฎ. Can I tell you about it?"
Start by making speech laws consistent and uniform for ALL under the 1st Amendment.
>just a bystander