Anonymous ID: 724b5c July 26, 2018, 9:23 a.m. No.2296789   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6945 >>7171 >>7193

Why are Hillary Clinton, John Podesta, Laurance Rockefeller, and Steven Greer pushing for FULL DISCLOSURE of aliens? (since the early 2000s).

 

https://www.cia.gov/library/readingroom/docs/CIA-RDP86-00513R001343720008-3.pdf

 

Page 19 and 20:

 

A Russian scientist makes a "photometer…" capable "…of measuring the brightness of the firmament".

 

Go on to say halos are "near-sun" and that we assume this on a "flat Earth".

 

Here is a PDF from NASA saying that airplanes only work on a flat non-rotating Earth (page 7 in the summary):

 

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19890005752.pdf

 

Here is another article/pdf by NASA saying that planes are considered point mass and the flight trajectory is strictly confined in a verticle plane on a "non-rotating, flat earth":

 

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20060053337

 

Here is a NASA document saying that radar data and roll-stabilized platforms would not be possible on a spherical Earth (By saying that these methods are only possible on a flat Earth):

 

https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19720012071.pdf

 

They (NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTRE) go on to define an Earth-fixed coordinate system that is flat in all direction. "It is assumed herein that the Earth is a flat, non-rotating reference frame"

 

Why did we look for moon rocks in Antarctica? (how would they have known?)

 

Why does the Apollo 17 video of Earth have a 25 hour time lapse where the CLOUDS DONT MOVE.

 

How come a NASA offical said "[The pics of the Earth are] photoshopped, because it has to be."? (Cant leave low Earth orbit, requiring to take photos of many sections and splicing them together, otherwise "…it would look flat.")

 

Why are the 'rocks' they took back from the moon actually petrified wood?

 

How come we can't go back to the Moon? NASA (Hebrew for deceit btw) has said we cant get past the "Van Allen Radiation Belts" and that we "lost the technology they used in 1969".

 

How come every NASA mission is named after false 'gods'? (Apollo for instance)

 

Why was NASA formed by Free Masons/NAZIs (Operation Paperclip)/Lucifarians?

 

Why was DARPA formed the same year as NASA?

 

Why did they have a project named Project Dominic (Meaning "Of the Lord") and within it a Project Fishbowl where they sent nukes into high altitude? (keep in mind this was after many operations in Antarctica)

 

If the Earth curves 8" per mile squared (8" first mile, 32" second mile, etc) then how come the Danyang-Kunshan Grand Bridge is flat without the 7000ft difference from one end to the other? (100miles long) (Pic related)

Anonymous ID: 724b5c July 26, 2018, 10:06 a.m. No.2297281   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7295

>>2296945

 

It works until you hit the radius of the Earth. Think of a man on top of a circle looking tangential outwardly, if you tried to measure past the Earth's radius the formula breaks down.

 

Here is a calculator:

 

https://dizzib.github.io/earth/curve-calc/?d0=100&h0=6&unit=imperial

 

NO OFFICAL CURAVTURE OF THE EARTH EXISTS. NO INSTITUTE SHOWS THESE CALCULATIONS.

 

Here is another guy (not a Flat Earther) coming to the same number:

 

https://www.davidsenesac.com/Information/line_of_sight.html

 

Quote:

 

"The Earth has a radius of approximately 3965 miles. Using the Pythagorean theorem, that calculates to an average curvature of 7.98 inches per mile or approximately 8 inches per mile (squared). The distance to the horizon in miles from height of an observer is approximately equal to 1.23 times the square root of the height in feet. For example 1.23 times the square root of 8 divided by 12 equals 1 mile. Inversely given the horizon distance in miles, the height in feet required to be visible equals the distance in miles squared divided by 1.513. The second example above concerning the Moon rising over a distant range also requires some topographic map calculations using the tan trigonometric function. Thus if a peak rises up 1844 feet at a distance of 10.0 miles or 52,800 feet, it will form an angle of 2 degrees with a theoretical flat horizon. The tan is 1844/52800=0.0349 or 2 degrees. However due to the Earth's curvature, it would appear as though it was only 1778 feet tall with the lowest 66 feet below the horizon."

 

If you believe in numberology:

 

How fast does the Earth move around the sun? (18.5 MILES PER SECOND, translated to MILES PER HOUR = 66,600)

What is the axis tilt of the Earth? (23.4 Degrees, 90 - 23.4 = 66.6 Degrees)

8 inches per mile squared is .666ft per mile squared.

 

Now those numbers prove nothing but make me go "hmmmmm".

Anonymous ID: 724b5c July 26, 2018, 10:13 a.m. No.2297395   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2297171

 

Alright, well forget I ever said 8" per square mile (even though that estimate is accurate).

 

A government agency even using the word "firmament" should tip you off.

The fact that planes don't move faster against Earth's spin than with Earth's spin should tip you off.

The lies from NASA should tip you off that maybe you shouldn't be listening to what they are saying.

 

Oh and let's look at your diety Nicolaus Copernicus, the forgotten freemason/satanist.

 

https://www.freemasons-freemasonry.com/forgotten_freemasons.html

https://www.themasonictrowel.com/books/the_square_and_compasses_falconer/files/chapter_51.htm