Confessed al-Qaida terrorist to Army judge: Guantánamo war court's a ‘covfefe’

WASHINGTON

A confessed al-Qaida terrorist turned U.S. government informant who is awaiting sentencing at Guantánamo complained to a war court judge this week of problems between his attorneys and prosecutors at a brief war court hearing ahead of his 2019 sentencing. “Over the last past six years, I’ve … been struggling with this whole process and the whole military commission system is pretty stagnant,” prisoner Majid Khan, a suburban Baltimore high school graduate, told a new judge on his case Tuesday, according to a transcript released by the Pentagon. “I call it ‘cluster covfefe,’ ” the Pakistani citizen added, using a made-up word or typo that President Donald Trump tweeted a year ago, in a midnight commentary about negative press coverage.

Khan, 38, a Pakistani former legal U.S. resident is awaiting sentencing next year on charges of conspiring with al-Qaida, murder, attempted murder and spying, under a plea agreement that permits his release from the prison in 13 years. He was held and tortured for more than three years in the CIA’s secret prison network, according to his lawyers and the Senate intelligence committee’s declassified version of the so-called Torture Report. Without explaining further, he told the judge that his lawyers and prosecutors weren’t getting along. “I hear a lot of ominous language from prosecutors all the time, so I don’t know where I am standing,” he said, adding that he preferred a more “amicable milieu.”

One issue had been the timing of his sentencing, now set for July 1, 2019. As part of the 2012 plea, he agreed to become a government witness, something his military jury might view favorably in deciding his sentence. But no war crimes case has come to trial that required his testimony, so his sentencing hearing has been has twice postponed by agreement of both sides. “Majid just wants to move forward and maximize his cooperation with as little disruption as possible,” said defense attorney Wells Dixon, who represents Khan pro bono. “He may get frustrated from time to time, but that’s only human. He’s done remarkably well over the last six years. We’re very proud of him.”

Another issue appears to be a churn of lawyers on the case. For Tuesday’s 2-hour, 10-minute hearing, there was a different judge, different prosecution team and different military defense attorney from his last appearance in September 2016. Khan’s long-serving military defense attorney, Army Lt. Col. Jon Jackson, has retired from service and was replaced by Navy Lt. Cmdr. Jared Hernandez, who is due to leave the case in September.

Khan, who Hernandez described in court as “Guantanamo’s only high-value cooperator,” wants the Pentagon to hire Jackson as a civilian defense lawyer for the case. Khan’s new military judge, Army Col. Douglas Watkins, last year handled the sentencing hearing of another al-Qaida foot soldier turned Guantánamo informant, former low-value detainee Ahmed al Darbi, a Saudi who was sent home to serve his sentence. For Tuesday’s hearing, Khan’s legal team questioned Watkins about possible conflicts, something that typically happens when a new judge appears at the war court.

“Not at all,” Watkins replied to a question of whether the CIA influences his decision making or controls his court. He said he was aware that Khan been held by the CIA and was aware of allegations of torture by lawyers but had never read the Senate intelligence committee’s torture report. At one point, Dixon asked, “Has your honor ever been involved in a case, in any fashion, where the accused was beaten or sleep deprived or stripped naked, waterboarded, or sexually assaulted?” — a clear reference to abuses that Khan’s lawyers say their client suffered. “Not that I’m aware of,” the judge replied.

Watkins declined to offer an opinion of whether those things individually or in combination constituted torture.

Read more here: https://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/nation-world/national/national-security/article215159130.html#storylink=cpy

(1 of 2)

>>2296748

Judge Orders New Trial in Al Qaeda Terror Case

Mr. Khan and Mr. al-Baluchi were the other detainees whose statements were cited in the judge’s ruling. Mr. Paracha, who did certain tasks for Mr. Khan, including checking on his immigration paperwork, offered the authorities varying and, at times, incriminating statements about what he knew of Mr. Khan’s and Mr. al-Baluchi’s ties to Al Qaeda, the opinion said.

At his trial, Mr. Paracha testified that key portions of his incriminating statements were false, “made out of a combination of fear, intimidation and exhaustion,” the judge wrote. Mr. Paracha also testified that he had never knowingly aided a terrorist group, saying, “If I had known these people were Al Qaeda, I would not have helped them out,” the judge noted.

In 2008, after Mr. Paracha’s conviction was affirmed on appeal, he filed a new trial motion, citing the detainee statements, which had been made before military tribunals or in interviews with federal agents, the judge said.

In his opinion, Judge Stein said that key portions of the statements “directly contradict the government’s case that defendant knowingly aided Al Qaeda.” Mr. Khan, for example, had said explicitly that Mr. Paracha was “innocent,” and Mr. Khan said he had never disclosed his Qaeda ties to Mr. Paracha. Judge Stein also cited statements by Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, who had “openly confessed his responsibility for dozens of heinous crimes and terrorist plots.”

“Crucially, K.S.M. nowhere mentions defendant or his father,” Judge Stein said. “From this new evidence,” the judge added, Mr. Paracha could “credibly ask the jury” to infer his innocence and “lack of involvement in the operations discussed.”

https:// www.newsround247.com/judge-orders-new-trial-in-al-qaeda-terror-case/

https://www.nytimes.com/topic/organization/al-qaeda (I placed this here to show where else its being reported)

(2 of 2)

>>2296830 (Connecting the Dots)

Snippet:

Guantanamo Bay detainee from Baltimore County details torture

Majid Khan's attorneys submitted notes describing the harsh treatment for review by the U.S. government, and they were declassified after a formal review. The notes provide new details beyond the actions described in a Senate Intelligence Committee report on the CIA's interrogation program.

excerpts describing a campaign that included:

•Being waterboarded twice in 2003.

•Being hung from a wooden board for three days and not fed.

•Spending nearly all of 2003 in complete darkness.

•Being held in solitary confinement for almost two years between 2004 and 2006.

The CIA declined to comment, but has said previously that its interrogation program generated information that was useful in confronting Khan after his capture.

https:// www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/bs-md-ci-majid-khan-torture-20150602-story.html

(1 of 2)