Anonymous ID: eecfe1 July 26, 2018, 9:30 a.m. No.2296840   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2296595

Announcing your birthday (or age, location, gender, timezone, marital status, occupation, etc.) is not a smart idea, as it might help /badfolks/ ID you.

If you have the ability to change your IP address I would suggest doing so now.

Remember anon, you are in a literal war zone and there are enemies lurking who would just as soon see you dead.

No, I'm not kidding.

Anonymous ID: eecfe1 July 26, 2018, 9:33 a.m. No.2296872   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7023

>>2296600

Every fad is suspicious.

Anons sense it intuitively.

Who wants to create this fad and why?

Who does it benefit?

 

So selfies isn't just about narcissism and living one's life in a very public way that defies surveillance and privacy.

 

Learn from this and be suspicious of any new fad. Remember Pokemon Go? Intelligence agencies were using phantoms on GPS maps to get people with cellphones to capture imagery on the ground of places of interest, at times of interest.

Anonymous ID: eecfe1 July 26, 2018, 9:43 a.m. No.2296974   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6994 >>7036 >>7317

>>2296954

I didn't know what Mandrax is.

 

"Methaqualone, sold under the brand name Quaalude and sometimes stylized "Quāālude" in the United States and Mandrax in the United Kingdom and South Africa, is a sedative and hypnotic medication. It is a member of the quinazolinone class."

Anonymous ID: eecfe1 July 26, 2018, 9:46 a.m. No.2297025   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2296993

Good morning/good day Boss.

 

>What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?

>Known beforehand?

Yes, said this yesterday in rsp to your crumb.

Logical conclusion is that Q team controls Ryan, and can be certain RR impeachment motion will be brought forward for a vote.

 

Am enjoying the show.

Anonymous ID: eecfe1 July 26, 2018, 9:50 a.m. No.2297080   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2297023

This anon does not have TV.

Does not watch movies.

Had a smartphone but no cell signals.

Turned the cellphone off months ago and does not use it.

Has the GPS chip turned off.

Has WiFi and Bluetooth turned off.

Does not use WiFi in the house.

Electrical tape over all PC cameras.

 

It is enough?

No, but it's prudent.

 

Asking Q:

WHEN/HOW are we going to get our personal privacy back? I don't see how it can happen, short of dismantling a whole lot of useful technology and destroying all the databases. I don't see how it can happen.

Anonymous ID: eecfe1 July 26, 2018, 9:53 a.m. No.2297124   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7170

>>2296993

>https://1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf

 

First few paragraphs of 48 page doc:

"ROBERT MUELLER: UNMASKED

by Congressman Louie Gohmert

Robert Mueller has a long and sordid history of illicitly targeting innocent people that is

a stain upon the legacy of American jurisprudence. He lacks the judgment and credibility

to lead the prosecution of anyone.

I do not make these statements lightly.

Each time I prepared to question Mueller during Congressional hearings, the more

concerned I became about his work ethic. Then as I went back to begin compiling all that

information in order to recount personal interactions with Mueller, the more clearly the

big picture began to come into focus. At one point I had to make the decision to stop

adding to this or it would turn into a far too lengthy project.

My goal was to share some first-hand information as other Republican Members of

Congress had requested, adding, “You seem to know so much about him.” This article is

prepared from my viewpoint to help better inform the reader about the Special

Prosecutor leading the effort to railroad President Donald J. Trump through whatever

manufactured charge he can allege. Judging by Mueller's history, it doesn't matter who

he has to threaten, harass, prosecute or bankrupt to get someone to be willing to allege

something—anything—about our current President, it certainly appears Mueller will do

what it takes to bring down his target, ethically, or unethically, based on my findings. …"

Anonymous ID: eecfe1 July 26, 2018, 10:04 a.m. No.2297259   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>2297186

I'm OK with it being a vow honoring JFK's death/sacrifice; respect; or remembrance. I'm not OK with praying to dead people; that would be blasphemy (dishonoring God). Blasphemy would inconsistent with everything else we think we know about POTUS and Q, so I do not attribute it to them.