Violation of the first amendment.
Yes, it is.
Take your own advice.
It means it's not parable. Truly, truly to see the kingdom of God you must be born again.
No, they don't. You can be sued civilly, but government does not get to dictate "truth" and decide what can and can not be published.
Who decides if it "really happened"?
>shouting fire in a crowded theatre
You mean the Truth of it?
People like you ALWAYS have some "justification" to limit our God given constitutionally protected right to free speech.
You can be sued for it.
Should you be stopped from publishing Truth because the ministry of truth says it's not true?
You know you're replying to yourself right? kek
>>22973804
Notice you enemies to the constitution always project bullshit on those calling out the violation of our constitution?
>Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
Except I didn't spam anything, I simply commented on the topic. You do know there are multiple anons here right? You're projecting onto me while accusing me of projecting kek
You done with your >reeeeeeeeeeeeee
now?
See more projection
> We'll just have to agree to disagree.
I asked if you were done with your >reeeeeee but you weren't.
KMAO projections all you've got.
Oh feel free to reeeeeeeee, I'm not the one against the first amendment here remember? I'm the one for it.
Once again you're projecting nonsense. I never had a problem with posting the bill. Post away.
I'm never against shining a light.
Not that I like Laura Loomer, but where did she say they did all of that in THAT bill?
Sacrifice to save those behind them