>>22973613

(b) A person may not, with the intent to influence an

election, knowingly cause to be published, distributed, or

broadcast political advertising that includes an image, audio

recording, or video recording of an officeholder's or candidate's

appearance, speech, or conductthat did not occur in reality,

including an image, audio recording, or video recording that has

been altered using generative artificial intelligence technology,

unless the political advertising includes a disclosure from the

person or another person on whose behalf the political advertising

is published, distributed, or broadcast indicating that the image,

audio recording, or video recording did not occur in reality.

>>22973633

No it's not.

>>22973637

Go back to school and get some reading comprehension.

>>22973658

>Does NOT apply to memes.

EXACTLY

>>22973662

Go read it yourself, idiot.

https://legiscan.com/TX/text/HB366/2025

>>22973682

It does not effect the citizens, only political advertisements and so forth.

Slander is unlawful, AI is apparently being used to slander people and politicians.

Just like the Revenge Porn bill they passed yesterday in DC, people using AI generated videos to hurt others.

HB366 kills the AI generated bullshit from political ads, getting revenge on politicians for voting a certain way, but does nothing to hinder We the People from making political memes and so on.

In short, they restricted their own freedom of speech, not the people's freedom of speech.

>>22973706

>It's unconstitutional period.

Don't hear you bitching about the Revenge Porn bill that DC passed yesterday and is now headed to Trump's desk.

Go look it up.

>>22973719

It's the same principle, just different subject matter.

>>22973723

>IF you clearly state it's a deepfake and didn't really happen

That's the catch, right there.

DISCLAIMER has to be present.

millstone

Prime example of AI generated video.

If they had a little more power under the hood, it would have been life-like.

>>22973827

I'll have to admit, my first response to that law was, "WTF Texas!"

So I went to read the bill myself, that's when I noticed it was being misinformed here, but yeah, I was pissed seeing that.

>>22973852

>who decides what's real or not?

I take it you still have not read the bill.

Look who is screaming bullshit…she never read the bill.