>>2296789 (pb)
>>2297171 (pb)
>>2297201 (pb)
Round v Flat.
It doesn't fucking matter!
We are living in a simulation.
The math points to this as being truth.
Think about it like the video game, The Sims.
As far as the Sim is concerned, particles A and B are separated by distance D.
They observe in their reality, just as we do in ours, that A and B can be (are) entangled.
(Actually, EVERY particle in the Universe is connected to every other particle, but that's for another discussion at another time.)
They understand, just as we do, that the Universe has a "speed limit". The speed of LIGHT.
They also understand that it cannot be broken.
So, how are A and B breaking that speed limit?
In a simulation, you can make the particles appear to be anywhere you like.
They are NOT separated by ANY value of D. Not to the creators of the simulation, at least.
These particles are simply LOGIC gates in a CPU.
No distance or time need be accounted for.
I really cannot articulate just how DEEP and PROFOUND this line of thinking actually is!
Here's some Q drop to ponder when thinking about my statements above.
>What is information?
Reality.
>WHO HAS ALL OF THE INFORMATION?
The architects/users who sit OUTSIDE of our simulated reality.
>Disinformation is real.
>Disinformation is necessary.
Otherwise;
>The truth would put 99% of people in the hospital.
>The complete picture would put 99% of Americans (the World) in a hospital.
>Who has all the information?
>(Y) What does it mean to be covered in gold?
Again, the architects/users.
Gold is an excellent conductor.
>What is most valuable?
>Information
Information IS reality.
>Who made it public?
>Who really made it public?
>Who is making it all public?
>WE ARE THE GATEKEEPERS OF ALL [BY ALL WE MEAN ALL] INFORMATION.
Architect(s) much, Q?
>GLIMPSE.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GLIMPSE
>The basic algorithm is similar to other text indexing and retrieval engines, except that the text records in the index are huge, consisting of multiple files each. This index is searched using a boolean matching algorithm like most other text indexing and retrieval engines. After one or more of these large text records is matched, Agrep is used to actually scan for the exact text desired. While this is slower than traditional totally indexed approaches, the advantage of the smaller index is seen to be advantageous to the individual user. This approach would not work particularly well across websites, but it would work reasonably well for a single site, or a single workstation. In addition, the smaller index can be created more quickly than a full index.
Take note of the last two sentences.
Single site/workstation?
How about a single simulated reality?
>You cannot possibly imagine the size of this.
I'll say.
Our reality, and EVERYTHING in it, is the AI
Those OUTSIDE, the architects/users, are the true masters