Q
Enjoy the show.
You have a front row seat.
Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?
Trust yourself.
Think for yourself.
Clickbait derails logical thought.
LOGICAL THINKING.
Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?
When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?
When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?
Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?
POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?
What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?
Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?
Why did Sessions recuse?
Why is this important?
Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?
Who does Huber [directly] report to?
One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.
Think logically.
Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?
Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?
Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?
What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?
Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?
Think logically.
Optics.
Known beforehand?
What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?
https://1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf
▶Q !CbboFOtcZs 07/26/18 (Thu) 11:44:26 d74be4 (1) No.2296993