Anonymous ID: f2fac1 July 26, 2018, 10:20 a.m. No.2297464   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7538

(repost from last bread)

]Sessions[ cleans DOJ

Wray cleans FBI

Kansas started cleaning CIA, now Haspel is continuing to clean CIA

Rex started cleaning State, now Kansas is continuing to clean State

Bolton cleans NSC

Other Department secretaries are cleaning their departments, POTUS’ appointments to the FED cleans the FED

HOROWITZ, reporting to Sessions, investigates people who are STILL in government, to be prosecuted by DOJ

HUBER, reporting to Sessions, investigates people who are OUT OF government, to be prosecuted by HUBER

MUELLER, reporting to RR, EXONERATES POTUS and goes after plants

ALL REPORT TO POTUS, WHO SET THIS PLAN INTO MOTION, AND HAS OVERSEEN ITS EXECUTION

TRUST THE FUCKING PLAN

 

hope it helps with the RR/RM debate

Anonymous ID: f2fac1 July 26, 2018, 10:59 a.m. No.2297902   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7954 >>8073 >>8103 >>8178

https://1zwchz1jbsr61f1c4mgf0abl-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Gohmert_Mueller_UNMASKED.pdf

>DOcs of Gohmert calling out Mueller

What was the point of filing impeachment art if Ryan was going to reject?

>to have the D's rally around RR (OPTICS)

Known beforehand?

>Yes, they know RR will not be impeached

Optics.

>THE D'S RALLY AROUND RR AND MUELLER

Think logically.

>TRUST THE PLAN

Could Sessions publicly challenge [RR] w/o creating a dilemma?

>NO

What events would immediately transpire if Sessions challenged [RR]?

>The D's would attack Sessions, say its a threat to Mueller, and demand sessions resign

Would it immediately demonstrate that Sessions must be aware of key Mueller facts?

>YES, CAN'T DO IT FOR THE OPTICS (D'S NEED TO THINK MUELLER AND RR ARE ON THEIR SIDE)

Facts (or failure of duty) that he cannot possibly ‘know’ if recused?

>YES

Facts (a case) he is suppose to be recused from?

>YES

Think logically.

>TRUST THE PLAN

One challenge to [RR] would immediately trigger attacks to remove Sessions given his clear involvement in receiving information re: a case he is fully recused from.

Who does Huber [directly] report to?

>SESSIONS

Is it normal [RR] is side-stepped re: Huber CoC?

>NO

Why is this important?

>RR OVERSEES MUELLER, SESSIONS OVERSEES HUBER; MUELLE EXONERATES POTUS, HUBER PROSECUTES ENEMIES

Why did Sessions recuse?

>OPTICS, so the D's would trust RR and not call for the end of the EXONERATION probe

Is the LEFT attacking Sessions?

>No, leaving him alone to WORK WITH HUBER

What advantage(s) exist based on this setup?

>the D's are focused on RR/Mueller thinking they are on their side so they will accept Mueller's findings EXONERATING POTUS; and so Sessions/Huber can silently work on building the case to PROSECUTE THE ENEMIES OF WE THE PEOPLE

POTUS publicly expresses his anger re: his recusal?

>OPTICS

Do you believe POTUS would allow a complete takeover of his DOJ if nothing was being done behind the scenes to hold people accountable?

>NO, NEVER, POTUS IS RUNNING THE SHOW

When POTUS states “the swamp is being drained” do you believe it?

>YES, we see it too

When POTUS states “it’s happening” do you believe it?

>YES, we see it too

Do you believe POTUS would allow Sessions & [RR] to run HIS DOJ if something wasn’t being done to his liking?

>NO, NEVER, HE APPOINTED SESSIONS, AND SESSIONS APPOINTED RR, AND RR APPOINTED MUELLER

LOGICAL THINKING.

>TRUST THE PLAN

Clickbait derails logical thought.

>for the left, KEK

Think for yourself.

Trust yourself.

Mueller investigating POTUS’ Tweets for obstruction?

>FAKE NEWS, CLICKBAIT!

You have a front row seat.

>YES WE DO

Enjoy the show.

>YES WE ARE, ITS A GREAT SHOW!

Q